Physics 2 Quiz: Magnetic Force On Wire
5 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Magnetic Force On WireQuestion 1 of 5

A straight wire of length L=0.50 mL = 0.50 \text{ m} carries a current of I=4.0 AI = 4.0 \text{ A} in the +x+x-direction. It is immersed in a uniform magnetic field B=(0.30x^0.40z^) T\vec{B} = (0.30\hat{x} - 0.40\hat{z}) \text{ T}.

What is the magnitude of the magnetic force on this wire?

0.80 N0.80 \text{ N}, directed in the +y+y-direction, because only the zz-component of B\vec{B} contributes to the cross product x^×z^\hat{x} \times \hat{z}, yielding F=ILBz=(4.0)(0.50)(0.40)F = ILB_z = (4.0)(0.50)(0.40).
0.70 N0.70 \text{ N}, because both field components contribute equally and the net force magnitude is ILBtotal=(4.0)(0.50)(0.50)ILB_{\text{total}} = (4.0)(0.50)(0.50), where Btotal=0.302+0.402B_{\text{total}} = \sqrt{0.30^2 + 0.40^2}.
0.60 N0.60 \text{ N}, because the xx-component of B\vec{B} is parallel to the current and therefore contributes a force ILBx=(4.0)(0.50)(0.30)ILB_x = (4.0)(0.50)(0.30), which must be added to the force from the zz-component.
0.28 N0.28 \text{ N}, because the xx-component of B\vec{B} is parallel to the current and contributes nothing, while the zz-component contributes ILBxsin(θ)ILB_x\sin(\theta) where θ\theta is the angle between the two non-zero components.
← Back to quizzes

Physics 2 Quiz

Physics 2 Quiz: Magnetic Force On Wire

Practice Magnetic Force On Wire in Physics 2 with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Magnetic Force On Wire, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Physics 2.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A straight wire of length L=0.50 mL = 0.50 \text{ m} carries a current of I=4.0 AI = 4.0 \text{ A} in the +x+x-direction. It is immersed in a uniform magnetic field B=(0.30x^0.40z^) T\vec{B} = (0.30\hat{x} - 0.40\hat{z}) \text{ T}.

What is the magnitude of the magnetic force on this wire?

  1. 0.80 N0.80 \text{ N}, directed in the +y+y-direction, because only the zz-component of B\vec{B} contributes to the cross product x^×z^\hat{x} \times \hat{z}, yielding F=ILBz=(4.0)(0.50)(0.40)F = ILB_z = (4.0)(0.50)(0.40). (correct answer)
  2. 0.70 N0.70 \text{ N}, because both field components contribute equally and the net force magnitude is ILBtotal=(4.0)(0.50)(0.50)ILB_{\text{total}} = (4.0)(0.50)(0.50), where Btotal=0.302+0.402B_{\text{total}} = \sqrt{0.30^2 + 0.40^2}.
  3. 0.60 N0.60 \text{ N}, because the xx-component of B\vec{B} is parallel to the current and therefore contributes a force ILBx=(4.0)(0.50)(0.30)ILB_x = (4.0)(0.50)(0.30), which must be added to the force from the zz-component.
  4. 0.28 N0.28 \text{ N}, because the xx-component of B\vec{B} is parallel to the current and contributes nothing, while the zz-component contributes ILBxsin(θ)ILB_x\sin(\theta) where θ\theta is the angle between the two non-zero components.
Explanation: When a current-carrying wire sits in a magnetic field, the force on it comes from F=IL×B\vec{F} = I\vec{L} \times \vec{B}. The critical insight is that only the component of B\vec{B} perpendicular to the current contributes — a field component parallel to the current produces zero force, since x^×x^=0\hat{x} \times \hat{x} = 0. Here, the current flows in the +x+x-direction, so L=Lx^=0.50x^\vec{L} = L\hat{x} = 0.50\hat{x}. Expanding the cross product: F=IL×B=I(Lx^)×(0.30x^0.40z^)\vec{F} = I\vec{L} \times \vec{B} = I(L\hat{x}) \times (0.30\hat{x} - 0.40\hat{z}) =IL[0.30(x^×x^)0.40(x^×z^)]= IL\bigl[0.30(\hat{x}\times\hat{x}) - 0.40(\hat{x}\times\hat{z})\bigr] Since x^×x^=0\hat{x}\times\hat{x} = 0 and x^×z^=y^\hat{x}\times\hat{z} = -\hat{y}: F=IL(0.40)y^=(4.0)(0.50)(0.40)y^=0.80y^ N\vec{F} = IL(0.40)\hat{y} = (4.0)(0.50)(0.40)\hat{y} = 0.80\hat{y} \text{ N} This confirms A is correct: the magnitude is 0.80 N0.80 \text{ N} in the +y+y-direction, driven entirely by the zz-component of B\vec{B}. B is wrong because you cannot simply use BtotalB_{\text{total}} in the force formula — the parallel component (BxB_x) is physically incapable of exerting a force on the wire, so lumping both components together overstates the result. C compounds that same error by adding a force from BxB_x, which produces no force at all. D introduces an unnecessary angle calculation and arrives at a value that matches neither the correct cross product nor the geometry. Your study tip: always decompose B\vec{B} and ask yourself which components are parallel vs. perpendicular to L\vec{L} before calculating. Parallel components vanish — only perpendicular components do work in the cross product.

Question 2

A rigid wire segment of length L=0.40 mL = 0.40 \text{ m} is oriented along the direction u^=12x^+12y^\hat{u} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\hat{x} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\hat{y} and carries current I=5.0 AI = 5.0 \text{ A} in the +u^+\hat{u} direction. It is placed in a uniform field B=B0y^\vec{B} = B_0\hat{y} where B0=0.60 TB_0 = 0.60 \text{ T}.

What is the magnitude and direction of the magnetic force on this wire segment?

  1. F=ILB0/20.85 N|\vec{F}| = ILB_0/\sqrt{2} \approx 0.85 \text{ N}, directed in the z^-\hat{z}-direction, because the y^\hat{y}-component of the wire is parallel to B\vec{B} and produces no force, and the x^\hat{x}-component gives x^×y^\hat{x}\times\hat{y}; applying the right-hand rule with the fingers curling from x^\hat{x} toward y^\hat{y} yields a force in z^-\hat{z}.
  2. F=ILB0/20.85 N|\vec{F}| = ILB_0/\sqrt{2} \approx 0.85 \text{ N}, directed in the +z^+\hat{z}-direction, because F=IL(u^×B)=IL(12x^+12y^)×(B0y^)=ILB02(x^×y^)=ILB02z^\vec{F} = IL(\hat{u}\times\vec{B}) = IL\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\hat{x}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\hat{y}\right)\times(B_0\hat{y}) = \frac{ILB_0}{\sqrt{2}}(\hat{x}\times\hat{y}) = \frac{ILB_0}{\sqrt{2}}\hat{z}, since y^×y^=0\hat{y}\times\hat{y}=0. (correct answer)
  3. F=ILB0=(5.0)(0.40)(0.60)=1.2 N|\vec{F}| = ILB_0 = (5.0)(0.40)(0.60) = 1.2 \text{ N}, directed in the +z^+\hat{z}-direction, because the magnetic force formula F=ILBF=ILB uses the full length of the wire and the full field magnitude regardless of the wire's orientation, since every element of the wire is immersed in the field B\vec{B}.
  4. F=ILB0cos45°0.85 N|\vec{F}| = ILB_0\cos45° \approx 0.85 \text{ N}, directed in the +y^+\hat{y}-direction, because the component of the wire along y^\hat{y} (equal to L/2L/\sqrt{2}) is parallel to B\vec{B} and therefore experiences the strongest interaction, producing a force in the +y^+\hat{y}-direction, while the perpendicular component's contribution is negligible.
Explanation: When a current-carrying wire sits in a magnetic field, the force on it is F=IL×B\vec{F} = I\vec{L} \times \vec{B}, where L\vec{L} is the length vector pointing in the direction of current flow. The key insight is that only the component of the wire perpendicular to B\vec{B} contributes to the force — parallel components produce zero force because y^×y^=0\hat{y} \times \hat{y} = 0. Here, L=Lu^=L(12x^+12y^)\vec{L} = L\hat{u} = L\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\hat{x} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\hat{y}\right) and B=B0y^\vec{B} = B_0\hat{y}. Computing the cross product: F=IL(12x^+12y^)×B0y^=ILB02(x^×y^)+ILB02(y^×y^)\vec{F} = IL\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\hat{x} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\hat{y}\right) \times B_0\hat{y} = \frac{ILB_0}{\sqrt{2}}(\hat{x}\times\hat{y}) + \frac{ILB_0}{\sqrt{2}}(\hat{y}\times\hat{y}). Since x^×y^=+z^\hat{x}\times\hat{y} = +\hat{z} and y^×y^=0\hat{y}\times\hat{y} = 0, the result is ILB02z^0.85 N\frac{ILB_0}{\sqrt{2}}\hat{z} \approx 0.85\ \text{N} in the +z^+\hat{z}-direction. That confirms B. A is wrong not in magnitude but in direction — it claims x^×y^=z^\hat{x}\times\hat{y} = -\hat{z}, which is a right-hand rule error. Using the right-hand rule correctly, fingers curl from x^\hat{x} toward y^\hat{y} and the thumb points in +z^+\hat{z}, not z^-\hat{z}. C ignores the wire's orientation entirely and incorrectly applies F=ILBF = ILB as if the wire were perpendicular to B\vec{B}, overstating the force. D confuses which component matters — the parallel component (along y^\hat{y}) contributes nothing, and the direction of force must be perpendicular to both the wire and the field, never along y^\hat{y}. Your go-to strategy: always distribute the cross product term by term. Parallel terms vanish instantly, and perpendicular terms give you both the magnitude and direction cleanly — no guessing required.

Question 3

A rigid rectangular loop of wire has dimensions a=0.20 ma = 0.20 \text{ m} (width, along xx) and b=0.40 mb = 0.40 \text{ m} (height, along yy). It carries a clockwise current I=5.0 AI = 5.0 \text{ A} when viewed from the +z+z-direction. A uniform magnetic field B=0.60x^ T\vec{B} = 0.60\hat{x} \text{ T} permeates the region. The loop lies entirely in the xyxy-plane.

What is the net magnetic force on the entire rectangular loop?

  1. Fnet=1.2y^ N\vec{F}_{\text{net}} = 1.2\hat{y} \text{ N}, because the horizontal segments of the loop carry current along x^\hat{x}, which is parallel to the field, while the vertical segments produce forces that partially cancel, leaving a net force in y^\hat{y}.
  2. Fnet=1.2z^ N\vec{F}_{\text{net}} = 1.2\hat{z} \text{ N}, because the two vertical sides of the loop both carry current with a yy-component, and y^×x^=z^\hat{y} \times \hat{x} = -\hat{z} for one side and (y^)×x^=+z^(-\hat{y}) \times \hat{x} = +\hat{z} for the other, but these forces act on the same side and do not cancel.
  3. Fnet=2.4z^ N\vec{F}_{\text{net}} = 2.4\hat{z} \text{ N}, because the net force is computed by summing only the forces on the two sides parallel to y^\hat{y}, each contributing IbB=(5.0)(0.40)(0.60)=1.2 NIbB = (5.0)(0.40)(0.60) = 1.2 \text{ N} in the same z^\hat{z}-direction.
  4. Fnet=0\vec{F}_{\text{net}} = 0, because for any closed current loop in a uniform magnetic field, the forces on opposite sides are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, so all contributions cancel regardless of the current direction or loop orientation. (correct answer)
Explanation: Whenever you see a question about the net force on a current loop in a uniform magnetic field, the single most important principle to recall is this: the net magnetic force on any closed current loop in a uniform field is always zero. Here's why. The net force on a current-carrying conductor is F=Id×B\vec{F} = I\int d\vec{\ell} \times \vec{B}. For a closed loop, you're integrating dd\vec{\ell} around a complete circuit. Since B\vec{B} is uniform (constant), it factors out: Fnet=I(d)×B\vec{F}_{\text{net}} = I\left(\oint d\vec{\ell}\right) \times \vec{B}. The closed-loop integral d=0\oint d\vec{\ell} = \vec{0} because every displacement around the loop brings you back to the starting point — the vector sum of all path segments is zero. Therefore Fnet=0\vec{F}_{\text{net}} = \vec{0}, confirming D is correct. This holds regardless of loop shape, current direction, or orientation. Choice A is wrong because it claims forces on vertical segments only "partially cancel" — they cancel completely, and horizontal segments (parallel to B\vec{B}) contribute zero force, not some net y^\hat{y} force. Choice B is wrong because while y^×x^=z^\hat{y} \times \hat{x} = -\hat{z} and (y^)×x^=+z^(-\hat{y}) \times \hat{x} = +\hat{z} are correct cross products, these forces occur on opposite sides of the loop and are equal and opposite — they cancel exactly. Choice C doubles down on B's error, incorrectly adding both vertical-side forces in the same direction rather than recognizing they oppose each other. Study tip: Always distinguish between net force (zero in a uniform field) and net torque (which can be nonzero). Exam questions often test whether you conflate these two — a uniform field can rotate a loop without translating it.

Question 4

A current-carrying wire is shaped into an irregular closed loop lying in the xyxy-plane and carries a steady current II. The loop is placed in a non-uniform magnetic field B(x,y)=B0(1+αx)z^\vec{B}(x,y) = B_0(1 + \alpha x)\hat{z}, where B0B_0 and α\alpha are positive constants and xx is the horizontal coordinate.

Which of the following statements best describes the net magnetic force on the closed loop?

  1. The net force is zero, because the magnetic force on any closed current loop is always zero regardless of whether the field is uniform or non-uniform, as a direct consequence of the closed-path integral d=0\oint d\vec{\ell} = 0.
  2. The net force is generally nonzero and directed in the ±x\pm x-direction, because the field strength increases with xx, so portions of the loop at larger xx experience a stronger force than portions at smaller xx, and these unequal forces do not cancel for a non-uniform field. (correct answer)
  3. The net force is nonzero and directed in the +z+z-direction, because the curl of B\vec{B} is nonzero (Bz/x=B0α0\partial B_z/\partial x = B_0\alpha \neq 0), and the net force on a magnetic dipole in a non-uniform field is always directed along the field vector B\vec{B}, which points in +z^+\hat{z}.
  4. The net force is zero, because although the field is non-uniform, every infinitesimal force element Id×BId\vec{\ell}\times\vec{B} lies in the xyxy-plane, and integrating these in-plane forces around any closed loop always yields zero by Green's theorem applied to planar vector fields.
Explanation: When a current loop sits in a non-uniform magnetic field, the key question is whether forces on opposite segments cancel. Start by writing the infinitesimal force element: dF=Id×Bd\vec{F} = I\,d\vec{\ell} \times \vec{B}. For this field, B=B0(1+αx)z^\vec{B} = B_0(1+\alpha x)\hat{z}, and since the loop lies in the xyxy-plane, every dd\vec{\ell} has only x^\hat{x} and y^\hat{y} components. Crossing those with z^\hat{z} produces forces in the xyxy-plane — specifically, segments with x^\hat{x} components produce y^\hat{y} forces and vice versa. Crucially, because the field magnitude grows with xx, segments on the right side of the loop are pulled with greater force than corresponding segments on the left. These forces don't cancel, producing a net force in the +x+x-direction, confirming B is correct. A is wrong because the identity d=0\oint d\vec{\ell} = 0 only guarantees zero net force in a uniform field (where you can factor B\vec{B} outside the integral). When B\vec{B} varies with position, you cannot factor it out, so the integral does not simplify to zero. C is wrong on two counts: the net force on a planar loop in this field lies in the xyxy-plane, not z^\hat{z}, and the dipole-force formula F=(mB)\vec{F} = \nabla(\vec{m}\cdot\vec{B}) does not say the force is always along B\vec{B} itself. D is wrong because Green's theorem does not guarantee cancellation of force integrals — that theorem relates line integrals to area integrals of curls of scalar/vector functions, not to force balance in a position-dependent field. Study tip: On non-uniform field problems, immediately ask yourself: can I factor B\vec{B} outside the integral? If not, forces on opposite segments won't cancel, and you should expect a net force directed along the gradient of field strength.

Question 5

A wire segment of length L=0.30 mL = 0.30 \text{ m} carries current I=8.0 AI = 8.0 \text{ A}. The wire makes an angle of 30°30° with a uniform magnetic field of magnitude B=0.25 TB = 0.25 \text{ T}. A student claims that doubling the current while simultaneously halving the length of the wire will leave the magnetic force on the wire unchanged.

Is the student's claim correct, and what is the magnetic force on the original wire?

  1. The claim is incorrect, and the original force is F=ILBsin30°=0.30 NF = ILB\sin30° = 0.30 \text{ N}, because doubling II and halving LL preserves ILIL only if both changes are exact, but the resulting wire geometry changes the effective angle of force, altering sinθ\sin\theta and therefore the net force.
  2. The claim is correct, and the original force is F=ILB=(8.0)(0.30)(0.25)=0.60 NF = ILB = (8.0)(0.30)(0.25) = 0.60 \text{ N}, because the 30°30° angle does not modify the force formula when the wire is not perpendicular to the field, and ILIL is preserved under the proposed changes.
  3. The claim is correct, and the original force is F=ILBsin30°=(8.0)(0.30)(0.25)(0.50)=0.30 NF = ILB\sin30° = (8.0)(0.30)(0.25)(0.50) = 0.30 \text{ N}, because FILF \propto IL and doubling II while halving LL keeps the product ILIL constant at 2.4 Am2.4 \text{ A}\cdot\text{m}. (correct answer)
  4. The claim is incorrect, and the original force is F=ILBcos30°=(8.0)(0.30)(0.25)(0.866)=0.52 NF = ILB\cos30° = (8.0)(0.30)(0.25)(0.866) = 0.52 \text{ N}, because the relevant projection of the wire onto the field direction uses cos30°\cos30°, and shortening the wire changes this projection in a way that does not preserve the force.
Explanation: When a current-carrying wire sits in a magnetic field at an angle, the force on it follows F=ILBsinθF = ILB\sin\theta. The sine function appears because only the component of the wire perpendicular to the field contributes to the force — this is a direct consequence of the cross product in the Lorentz force law. For the original wire: F=(8.0)(0.30)(0.25)sin30°=(8.0)(0.30)(0.25)(0.50)=0.30 NF = (8.0)(0.30)(0.25)\sin30° = (8.0)(0.30)(0.25)(0.50) = 0.30 \text{ N}. Now consider the student's modification: double II to 16.0 A16.0 \text{ A}, halve LL to 0.15 m0.15 \text{ m}. The new force is F=(16.0)(0.15)(0.25)sin30°=(2.4)(0.25)(0.50)=0.30 NF' = (16.0)(0.15)(0.25)\sin30° = (2.4)(0.25)(0.50) = 0.30 \text{ N}. Since ILIL stays at 2.4 Am2.4 \text{ A}\cdot\text{m} and BB and θ\theta are unchanged, the force is indeed preserved. C is correct. Choice A contains a subtle trap — it claims that shortening the wire somehow changes the effective angle θ\theta. It doesn't. The angle between the wire's orientation and the field is a geometric property you control independently of II or LL. There's no mechanism here that rotates the wire. Choice B drops the sin30°\sin30° factor entirely, as if the angle doesn't matter. This is a classic mistake — the angle always matters unless the wire is perpendicular to the field (sin90°=1\sin90° = 1). Choice D substitutes cos30°\cos30° for sin30°\sin30°, confusing which component is relevant. The cosine would give the component parallel to the field, which contributes zero force. Study tip: Whenever you see F=ILBF = ILB, immediately ask yourself, "where's the sinθ\sin\theta?" Its absence is almost always a trap.