Physics 2 Quiz: Kirchhoffs Voltage Law
8 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Kirchhoffs Voltage LawQuestion 1 of 8

A circuit consists of a single loop: an ideal 18 V battery, a resistor RA=3 ΩR_A = 3\text{ }\Omega, a capacitor CC that is fully charged (steady-state DC condition), and a resistor RB=6 ΩR_B = 6\text{ }\Omega, all in series. The capacitor is connected between the two resistors.

At steady state, what does KVL predict for the voltage across the capacitor VCV_C?

VC=6 VV_C = 6\text{ V}, because in steady state the capacitor acts as an open circuit, and the 18 V divides proportionally between the two resistors; since RBR_B is twice RAR_A, the capacitor charges to the voltage across the smaller resistor.
VC=12 VV_C = 12\text{ V}, because in steady state the current is determined by the series resistance, and the capacitor voltage is found by applying the voltage-divider rule using only RBR_B out of the total resistance.
VC=9 VV_C = 9\text{ V}, because in steady state the capacitor blocks DC and the voltage divides equally between RAR_A and RBR_B due to equal energy storage in each element, leaving half the battery voltage for the capacitor.
VC=18 VV_C = 18\text{ V}, because in steady state no current flows through the series loop, so there are no resistive voltage drops, and KVL requires the capacitor to account for the entire EMF.
← Back to quizzes

Physics 2 Quiz

Physics 2 Quiz: Kirchhoffs Voltage Law

Practice Kirchhoffs Voltage Law in Physics 2 with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Kirchhoffs Voltage Law, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Physics 2.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A circuit consists of a single loop: an ideal 18 V battery, a resistor RA=3 ΩR_A = 3\text{ }\Omega, a capacitor CC that is fully charged (steady-state DC condition), and a resistor RB=6 ΩR_B = 6\text{ }\Omega, all in series. The capacitor is connected between the two resistors.

At steady state, what does KVL predict for the voltage across the capacitor VCV_C?

  1. VC=6 VV_C = 6\text{ V}, because in steady state the capacitor acts as an open circuit, and the 18 V divides proportionally between the two resistors; since RBR_B is twice RAR_A, the capacitor charges to the voltage across the smaller resistor.
  2. VC=12 VV_C = 12\text{ V}, because in steady state the current is determined by the series resistance, and the capacitor voltage is found by applying the voltage-divider rule using only RBR_B out of the total resistance.
  3. VC=9 VV_C = 9\text{ V}, because in steady state the capacitor blocks DC and the voltage divides equally between RAR_A and RBR_B due to equal energy storage in each element, leaving half the battery voltage for the capacitor.
  4. VC=18 VV_C = 18\text{ V}, because in steady state no current flows through the series loop, so there are no resistive voltage drops, and KVL requires the capacitor to account for the entire EMF. (correct answer)
Explanation: Whenever you see a capacitor in a DC circuit at steady state, the single most important fact to recall is that a fully charged capacitor acts as a perfect open circuit — zero current flows through it. Because the capacitor is in a single series loop with RAR_A and RBR_B, blocking the capacitor means blocking current through the entire loop. With I=0 AI = 0\text{ A}, Ohm's Law tells you the voltage drop across each resistor is V=IR=(0)(R)=0 VV = IR = (0)(R) = 0\text{ V}. Applying KVL around the loop: 18 VVRAVCVRB=018\text{ V} - V_{R_A} - V_C - V_{R_B} = 0, which simplifies to 180VC0=018 - 0 - V_C - 0 = 0, giving VC=18 VV_C = 18\text{ V}. Answer D is correct. Answer A is tempting but fatally flawed: it applies a voltage-divider formula assuming current flows, then assigns that divided voltage to the capacitor — a contradiction, since the capacitor is what stops the current. Answer B makes the same error, correctly identifying no current flows but then paradoxically using a current-dependent voltage-divider calculation anyway, arriving at RBRA+RB×18=12 V\frac{R_B}{R_A + R_B} \times 18 = 12\text{ V}. Answer C invents a fictitious "equal energy storage" principle that has no basis in circuit analysis; energy storage in a capacitor and resistors are entirely different quantities and cannot be equated this way. Study tip: In any steady-state DC problem, identify capacitors first and replace them with open circuits. This immediately zeroes out current in any branch containing a capacitor, which cascades through your KVL/KCL analysis.

Question 2

A student measures the terminal voltage of a battery with internal resistance r=2 Ωr = 2\text{ }\Omega and EMF E=10 V\mathcal{E} = 10\text{ V} while the battery is connected to an external resistor RextR_{ext}. The terminal voltage is measured as 8 V.

Using KVL, the student wants to determine RextR_{ext}. Which of the following correctly applies KVL to find RextR_{ext}, and correctly identifies what the terminal voltage represents in the KVL equation?

  1. KVL gives VterminalIr=0V_{\text{terminal}} - Ir = 0, so I=Vterminal/r=4 AI = V_{\text{terminal}}/r = 4\text{ A}, and Rext=(EVterminal)/I=0.5 ΩR_{ext} = (\mathcal{E} - V_{\text{terminal}})/I = 0.5\text{ }\Omega. The terminal voltage serves as the effective source voltage driving current through the internal resistance once the external load is connected.
  2. KVL gives EI(r+Rext)=0\mathcal{E} - I(r + R_{ext}) = 0, so I=E/(r+Rext)I = \mathcal{E}/(r + R_{ext}). Setting Vterminal=IrV_{\text{terminal}} = Ir (the drop across the internal resistance) gives I=8/2=4 AI = 8/2 = 4\text{ A}, and Rext=(EIr)/I=4 ΩR_{ext} = (\mathcal{E} - Ir)/I = 4\text{ }\Omega. The terminal voltage represents the portion of the EMF dissipated internally.
  3. KVL gives EIrVterminal=0\mathcal{E} - Ir - V_{\text{terminal}} = 0, where Vterminal=IRextV_{\text{terminal}} = IR_{ext}. Solving: I=(EVterminal)/r=1 AI = (\mathcal{E} - V_{\text{terminal}})/r = 1\text{ A}, so Rext=Vterminal/I=8 ΩR_{ext} = V_{\text{terminal}}/I = 8\text{ }\Omega. The terminal voltage equals the voltage across the external resistor and equals the EMF minus the internal voltage drop. (correct answer)
  4. KVL gives E+IrVterminal=0\mathcal{E} + Ir - V_{\text{terminal}} = 0, so I=(VterminalE)/r=1 AI = (V_{\text{terminal}} - \mathcal{E})/r = -1\text{ A}, giving Rext=Vterminal/I=8 ΩR_{ext} = V_{\text{terminal}}/|I| = 8\text{ }\Omega. The terminal voltage being less than the EMF indicates the battery is being charged, and the internal drop is subtracted from the terminal voltage to recover the EMF.
Explanation: When analyzing a battery circuit with internal resistance, the key framework is Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL): the EMF must equal the sum of all voltage drops around the loop. The critical insight is understanding what "terminal voltage" physically means — it's the voltage measured at the battery's terminals, which equals the voltage drop across the external resistor, not the internal one. Starting from KVL: EIrIRext=0\mathcal{E} - Ir - IR_{ext} = 0, which you can rewrite as EIrVterminal=0\mathcal{E} - Ir - V_{\text{terminal}} = 0 since Vterminal=IRextV_{\text{terminal}} = IR_{ext}. Plugging in: I=(EVterminal)/r=(108)/2=1 AI = (\mathcal{E} - V_{\text{terminal}})/r = (10 - 8)/2 = 1\text{ A}, giving Rext=8/1=8 ΩR_{ext} = 8/1 = 8\text{ }\Omega. This is exactly what C does, and its conceptual description is correct — the terminal voltage equals the EMF minus the internal drop. A is wrong because it sets up KVL incorrectly with only two terms and misidentifies the terminal voltage as the driving source across the internal resistance — a fundamental conceptual reversal. B makes a critical error: it sets Vterminal=IrV_{\text{terminal}} = Ir, meaning it treats terminal voltage as the internal drop rather than the external drop. This is the most common misconception on this topic and leads to a nonsensical physical picture. D incorrectly adds IrIr to the EMF in the KVL equation (sign error), which would only apply if the battery were being charged. The negative current result is a red flag that the loop equation was set up wrong. Remember: terminal voltage always equals the voltage across what's outside the battery. When you see Vterminal<EV_{\text{terminal}} < \mathcal{E}, the battery is discharging — never confuse this with charging.

Question 3

A student analyzes a two-loop network. Loop 1 contains a 9 V battery (internal resistance r=1 Ωr = 1\text{ }\Omega) and a resistor R1=5 ΩR_1 = 5\text{ }\Omega. Loop 2 shares R1R_1 with Loop 1 and also contains resistors R2=3 ΩR_2 = 3\text{ }\Omega and R3=6 ΩR_3 = 6\text{ }\Omega in series. The two loops share the branch containing R1R_1, and the student assigns mesh currents I1I_1 (clockwise in Loop 1) and I2I_2 (clockwise in Loop 2). No other EMF sources are present.

When the student writes the KVL equation for Loop 2 only, which expression is correct?

  1. (R1+R2+R3)I2R1I1=0(R_1 + R_2 + R_3)I_2 - R_1 I_1 = 0, because the shared branch carries net current (I2I1)(I_2 - I_1) and the voltage across R1R_1 due to I1I_1 opposes the I2I_2 contribution, while no EMF appears in Loop 2. (correct answer)
  2. (R2+R3)I2+R1(I1+I2)=0(R_2 + R_3)I_2 + R_1(I_1 + I_2) = 0, because mesh currents flowing through a shared resistor always add regardless of their relative directions, and no EMF source is present in Loop 2.
  3. (R1+R2+R3)I2+R1I1=0(R_1 + R_2 + R_3)I_2 + R_1 I_1 = 0, because the two mesh currents flow in opposite directions through R1R_1, so their contributions to the voltage drop across R1R_1 must be summed to get the total drop in Loop 2.
  4. (R2+R3)I2R1I1=0(R_2 + R_3)I_2 - R_1 I_1 = 0, because R1R_1 is a shared element and its voltage drop in Loop 2 is determined solely by I1I_1, the current from the adjacent loop, while I2I_2 does not pass through R1R_1 in the mesh formulation.
Explanation: Whenever you tackle mesh analysis (KVL with assigned loop currents), your job is to track every voltage drop around a given loop, paying close attention to how mesh currents interact on shared branches. For Loop 2, the resistors present are R1R_1 (shared with Loop 1), R2R_2, and R3R_3. Since both I1I_1 and I2I_2 are clockwise, they flow in opposite directions through the shared branch containing R1R_1. The net current through R1R_1 is therefore (I2I1)(I_2 - I_1), making the voltage drop across it R1(I2I1)R_1(I_2 - I_1). Adding the drops across R2R_2 and R3R_3, which carry only I2I_2, and setting the total equal to zero (no EMF in Loop 2) gives: R1(I2I1)+R2I2+R3I2=0    (R1+R2+R3)I2R1I1=0R_1(I_2 - I_1) + R_2 I_2 + R_3 I_2 = 0 \implies (R_1 + R_2 + R_3)I_2 - R_1 I_1 = 0 This is exactly answer A, and the reasoning is sound: the R1I1-R_1 I_1 term reflects the opposing contribution of the adjacent mesh current. B is wrong because it adds I1I_1 and I2I_2 through R1R_1, which would only be correct if the currents flowed in the same direction through that branch — they don't. C incorrectly writes +R1I1+R_1 I_1, implying the currents add through R1R_1, when they actually subtract because the mesh currents oppose each other in that branch. D is wrong because it excludes I2I_2 from the R1R_1 term entirely — I2I_2 absolutely passes through R1R_1 in the mesh formulation; that's the whole point of the shared branch. Your study tip: always draw arrows for each mesh current on the shared branch first. If arrows point opposite, subtract; if they point the same way, add. This single check prevents the most common mesh analysis mistakes.

Question 4

A circuit loop contains three EMF sources and three resistors arranged in series. Traversing the loop clockwise, the elements are encountered in this order: EMF source E1=12 V\mathcal{E}_1 = 12\text{ V} (positive terminal first), resistor R1=4 ΩR_1 = 4\text{ }\Omega, EMF source E2=6 V\mathcal{E}_2 = 6\text{ V} (negative terminal first), resistor R2=2 ΩR_2 = 2\text{ }\Omega, EMF source E3=3 V\mathcal{E}_3 = 3\text{ V} (positive terminal first), and resistor R3=3 ΩR_3 = 3\text{ }\Omega.

Applying Kirchhoff's voltage law to this loop with an assumed clockwise current direction, which of the following equations correctly represents the loop, and what is the resulting current magnitude?

  1. 124I62I+33I=012 - 4I - 6 - 2I + 3 - 3I = 0, giving I=1 AI = 1\text{ A} clockwise, because each EMF traversed positive-terminal-first contributes a positive term and each resistor drop opposes the assumed current direction. (correct answer)
  2. 12+4I6+2I+3+3I=012 + 4I - 6 + 2I + 3 + 3I = 0, giving I=99=1 AI = -\frac{9}{9} = -1\text{ A}, because resistor voltage drops are added when traversing in the direction of assumed current and EMFs are treated as fixed positive quantities.
  3. 124I+62I+33I=012 - 4I + 6 - 2I + 3 - 3I = 0, giving I=2192.3 AI = \frac{21}{9} \approx 2.3\text{ A} clockwise, because the second EMF, though encountered negative-terminal-first, still supplies energy to the loop and must be added.
  4. 124I62I33I=012 - 4I - 6 - 2I - 3 - 3I = 0, giving I=39=0.33 AI = \frac{3}{9} = 0.33\text{ A} clockwise, because all EMF sources encountered while traversing the loop in the current direction produce voltage drops regardless of terminal orientation.
Explanation: Whenever you see a Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) problem, your job is to apply a consistent sign convention as you traverse the loop. The standard rule: if you cross an EMF source from negative to positive terminal (i.e., positive terminal first in your traversal direction), you gain voltage — write . If you cross it from positive to negative terminal, you lose voltage — write −ε. For resistors, if you traverse in the same direction as assumed current, you lose voltage — write −IR. Answer A applies these rules correctly. Traversing clockwise: E1\mathcal{E}_1 is entered at its positive terminal, giving +12+12. Then R1R_1 opposes the assumed current: 4I-4I. E2\mathcal{E}_2 is entered at its negative terminal (a drop): 6-6. Then 2I-2I. E3\mathcal{E}_3 is entered at its positive terminal: +3+3. Then 3I-3I. This yields 124I62I+33I=012 - 4I - 6 - 2I + 3 - 3I = 0, so 99I=09 - 9I = 0, giving I=1 AI = 1\text{ A} clockwise. ✓ Answer B is wrong because it adds resistor drops instead of subtracting them — the opposite of the correct sign convention for resistors traversed in the current direction. Answer C incorrectly treats E2\mathcal{E}_2 as +6+6 despite it being entered negative-terminal-first. The terminal orientation determines the sign, not whether the source "supplies energy." Answer D makes the opposite error with E3\mathcal{E}_3, treating it as 3-3 even though it's entered positive-terminal-first, which should give a voltage gain. Study tip: Draw a small +/+/- label on each EMF as you traverse — the terminal you enter determines the sign. Positive terminal entry = voltage rise; negative terminal entry = voltage drop.

Question 5

A circuit has the following topology (described textually): Node A and Node B are connected by three parallel branches. Branch 1 contains only a 12 V battery (positive terminal at A). Branch 2 contains a 6 V battery (positive terminal at B) in series with a 4 Ω4\text{ }\Omega resistor. Branch 3 contains only an 8 Ω8\text{ }\Omega resistor. A student defines mesh current I1I_1 clockwise in the loop formed by Branches 1 and 2, and mesh current I2I_2 clockwise in the loop formed by Branches 2 and 3.

What is the KVL equation for the loop containing Branches 1 and 2 (the loop with I1I_1 and I2I_2)?

  1. 1264I18I2=012 - 6 - 4I_1 - 8I_2 = 0, because the loop traversal must account for the voltage drop across the 8 Ω8\text{ }\Omega resistor in Branch 3, which is shared between both mesh loops and therefore appears in both KVL equations.
  2. 12+64I1=012 + 6 - 4I_1 = 0, because both batteries drive current in the same direction around the Loop 1 mesh when the clockwise direction is defined consistently, and only I1I_1 flows through the resistor in Branch 2.
  3. 1264(I1I2)=012 - 6 - 4(I_1 - I_2) = 0, because traversing from A to B through Branch 1 gives +12 V, and returning B to A through Branch 2 gives −6 V (opposing EMF) and a resistor drop that accounts for both mesh currents sharing that branch. (correct answer)
  4. 12+64(I1I2)=012 + 6 - 4(I_1 - I_2) = 0, because the 6 V battery in Branch 2 is oriented with its positive terminal at B, and traversing B to A through Branch 2 in the clockwise direction means entering the positive terminal, which registers as a voltage rise in the mesh equation.
Explanation: When applying mesh analysis, your job is to write KVL equations by tracing each loop and carefully accounting for every voltage source and resistor — including how shared branches carry contributions from multiple mesh currents. For Loop 1 (Branches 1 and 2), trace clockwise starting at Node A. Traveling through Branch 1 (A→B), you cross the 12 V battery from negative to positive terminal, giving +12 V. Returning through Branch 2 (B→A), you first cross the 6 V battery — its positive terminal is at B, so traveling B→A means entering the positive terminal and exiting the negative terminal, which is a voltage drop: −6 V. Then you cross the 4 Ω resistor. Since I1I_1 flows through Branch 2 in the same direction as your traversal, and I2I_2 flows opposite to your traversal through that shared branch, the net current is (I1I2)(I_1 - I_2), giving a drop of 4(I1I2)-4(I_1 - I_2). This yields: 1264(I1I2)=012 - 6 - 4(I_1 - I_2) = 0, confirming C is correct. A is wrong because the 8 Ω resistor in Branch 3 is not part of Loop 1 — it only appears in Loop 1's equation if the branch is shared by that loop, which it isn't. B fails on two counts: the batteries don't add (they oppose each other in this loop), and it ignores I2I_2's contribution to the shared Branch 2 resistor. D incorrectly treats the 6 V battery as a rise rather than a drop. Entering the positive terminal during traversal is always a drop in KVL. A reliable strategy: always note which terminal you enter when crossing a battery — entering the positive terminal = voltage drop (−), entering the negative terminal = voltage rise (+). This single rule prevents most KVL sign errors.

Question 6

In a single-loop circuit, a student applies KVL and obtains I=0.5 AI = -0.5\text{ A}. The assumed current direction was clockwise. The circuit contains a 9 V battery (positive terminal on the left side), a 10 Ω10\text{ }\Omega resistor, and a second 4 V battery (positive terminal on the right side), all in series. The student is now asked to determine the voltage across the 10 Ω10\text{ }\Omega resistor and its polarity.

What is the correct voltage across the 10 Ω10\text{ }\Omega resistor and the correct polarity of its terminals?

  1. The magnitude is 5 V5\text{ V}, and the left terminal is at higher potential, because KVL polarity assignments are locked to the assumed current direction; a negative result changes only the current's magnitude interpretation, not the polarity labels assigned during the initial traversal.
  2. The magnitude is 5 V5\text{ V}, and the right terminal is at higher potential, because the negative current result means actual current flows counter-clockwise, entering the resistor from the right side, and current enters a resistor at its high-potential terminal. (correct answer)
  3. The magnitude is 5 V5\text{ V}, and neither terminal is definitively at higher potential, because a negative KVL current indicates the two batteries oppose each other with equal effect, leaving the resistor in an indeterminate voltage state that requires additional information to resolve.
  4. The magnitude is 5 V5\text{ V}, and the left terminal is at higher potential, because the 9 V battery is larger than the 4 V battery and dominates the loop, driving current clockwise from its positive terminal on the left side through the resistor, making the left terminal the entry point for conventional current.
Explanation: Whenever KVL gives you a negative current, that result is actually telling you something physically meaningful — don't just discard the sign. The negative sign means the actual current flows opposite to your assumed direction. If you assumed clockwise and got I=0.5 AI = -0.5\text{ A}, the real current is 0.5 A0.5\text{ A} counter-clockwise. This matters enormously for resistor polarity. The voltage magnitude across the 10 Ω10\text{ }\Omega resistor is I×R=0.5×10=5 V|I| \times R = 0.5 \times 10 = 5\text{ V}. But the high-potential terminal is determined by which side the actual current enters. Since actual current flows counter-clockwise, it enters the resistor from the right side — and by Ohm's law, current always enters a resistor at its higher-potential terminal. Therefore, the right terminal is at higher potential. That confirms B. Choice A is a classic trap: it treats polarity labels as permanently fixed to the assumed direction, ignoring what the negative sign physically reveals. Once you know current is actually counter-clockwise, the original polarity labels flip. Choice D makes the reasonable-sounding argument that the larger battery "wins" and drives clockwise current — but this is wrong because you must account for battery orientation, not just magnitude. The 4 V battery opposes the 9 V battery, and KVL already encoded all of that; the result is counter-clockwise current. Choice C incorrectly concludes the voltage is indeterminate. Two opposing batteries don't cancel to zero here — they produce a net 5 V5\text{ V} drop across the resistor with a perfectly definite polarity. Study tip: Treat a negative KVL current as a direction correction, not an error. Flip the assumed direction, then re-assign all resistor polarities accordingly before interpreting the circuit.

Question 7

Three identical batteries, each with EMF E=6 V\mathcal{E} = 6\text{ V} and internal resistance r=1 Ωr = 1\text{ }\Omega, are connected in a series-opposing configuration within a single loop: two batteries have their positive terminals pointing clockwise and one battery has its positive terminal pointing counter-clockwise. The loop also contains a single external resistor R=3 ΩR = 3\text{ }\Omega.

Applying KVL to find the current in this loop, which analysis is correct?

  1. The net EMF is 6+66=6 V6 + 6 - 6 = 6\text{ V} but internal resistances cancel for the opposing battery, giving total resistance 3+2(1)=5 Ω3 + 2(1) = 5\text{ }\Omega and I=1.2 AI = 1.2\text{ A}, because the reversed battery's internal resistance subtracts from the circuit resistance rather than adding to it.
  2. The net EMF driving the loop is 6+6+6=18 V6 + 6 + 6 = 18\text{ V} and the total resistance is 3+1=4 Ω3 + 1 = 4\text{ }\Omega, giving I=4.5 AI = 4.5\text{ A}, because all three EMF sources contribute positively to current flow regardless of orientation.
  3. The net EMF driving the loop is 666=6 V6 - 6 - 6 = -6\text{ V}, meaning I=1 AI = -1\text{ A}; the negative sign means the assumed direction was wrong, so the magnitude is 1 A1\text{ A} but all three batteries are discharging equally in the corrected direction.
  4. The net EMF driving the loop is 6+66=6 V6 + 6 - 6 = 6\text{ V} and the total resistance is 3+3(1)=6 Ω3 + 3(1) = 6\text{ }\Omega, giving I=1 AI = 1\text{ A}. The opposing battery is being charged by the current from the other two. (correct answer)
Explanation: When analyzing circuits with batteries in series, Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) requires you to track each EMF's sign based on direction, while every internal resistance always adds to the total resistance — regardless of battery orientation. This is the core concept being tested here. Walking through the correct analysis: assume current flows clockwise. The two clockwise batteries each contribute +6 V+6\text{ V}, while the counter-clockwise battery opposes the assumed direction, contributing 6 V-6\text{ V}. The net EMF is 6+66=6 V6 + 6 - 6 = 6\text{ V}. Crucially, all three internal resistances resist current flow regardless of orientation, so total resistance is R+3r=3+3(1)=6 ΩR + 3r = 3 + 3(1) = 6\text{ }\Omega. This gives I=6/6=1 AI = 6/6 = 1\text{ A}. Because current flows through the opposing battery in the direction that pushes charge against its EMF, that battery is being charged — not discharging. This confirms D. Choice A makes a critical error: it subtracts the opposing battery's internal resistance, as if orientation flips its contribution to resistance. It doesn't — internal resistance always dissipates energy. B ignores the opposing sign entirely, treating all three EMFs as aiding and dropping two internal resistances, producing a wildly inflated current. C gets the resistance right (implicitly 6 Ω6\text{ }\Omega) but miscounts the EMF signs, suggesting two batteries oppose the assumed direction when only one does, yielding the wrong magnitude and an incorrect claim about discharging. Your study tip: in any KVL problem, handle EMF signs and resistance separately. Signs depend on traversal direction; resistance is always positive and always sums.

Question 8

A Wheatstone bridge circuit is described as follows: a battery of EMF E=20 V\mathcal{E} = 20\text{ V} (ideal) connects nodes A (positive) and B (negative). From A, two parallel branches lead to node C and node D respectively. From C and D, two branches converge back to B. The four bridge resistors are: R1=5 ΩR_1 = 5\text{ }\Omega (A to C), R2=15 ΩR_2 = 15\text{ }\Omega (A to D), R3=10 ΩR_3 = 10\text{ }\Omega (C to B), R4=30 ΩR_4 = 30\text{ }\Omega (D to B). A galvanometer of resistance Rg=20 ΩR_g = 20\text{ }\Omega connects C to D. The student wants to determine whether the bridge is balanced and, if not, to apply KVL.

Is the bridge balanced, and what does this imply for the galvanometer current and the application of KVL?

  1. The bridge is unbalanced: although the cross-product check gives R1R4=5×30=150R_1 R_4 = 5 \times 30 = 150 and R2R3=15×10=150R_2 R_3 = 15 \times 10 = 150, these values being equal is a necessary but not sufficient condition for balance — the galvanometer resistance RgR_g must also equal the geometric mean of the bridge resistors for zero galvanometer current, which is not satisfied here.
  2. The bridge is balanced because R1/R3=R2/R4R_1/R_3 = R_2/R_4 (both equal 1/21/2), so no current flows through the galvanometer; the galvanometer branch can be removed, and KVL applied to each outer loop yields a consistent current in each branch without needing to account for the C–D branch. (correct answer)
  3. The bridge is balanced because R1/R3=5/10=0.5R_1/R_3 = 5/10 = 0.5 and R2/R4=15/30=0.5R_2/R_4 = 15/30 = 0.5, confirming VC=VDV_C = V_D; however, the galvanometer current is nonzero because current always flows through any resistive path that exists between two nodes, regardless of the potential difference across it.
  4. The bridge is unbalanced because the correct balance condition requires equal total resistance in each parallel branch: since R1+R3=15 ΩR2+R4=45 ΩR_1 + R_3 = 15\text{ }\Omega \neq R_2 + R_4 = 45\text{ }\Omega, the potentials at C and D differ, driving a nonzero galvanometer current that must be included in all KVL loop equations.
Explanation: Whenever you encounter a Wheatstone bridge problem, your first move should always be to check the balance condition: R1R3=R2R4\frac{R_1}{R_3} = \frac{R_2}{R_4}. If this ratio holds, the potentials at the two middle nodes are equal, and no current flows through the galvanometer — regardless of its resistance. Here, R1R3=510=0.5\frac{R_1}{R_3} = \frac{5}{10} = 0.5 and R2R4=1530=0.5\frac{R_2}{R_4} = \frac{15}{30} = 0.5. The ratios match, confirming the bridge is balanced and VC=VDV_C = V_D. With zero potential difference across the galvanometer, no current flows through it. You can therefore remove the galvanometer branch entirely and treat the circuit as two independent series combinations: the ACB branch (5+10=15 Ω5 + 10 = 15\ \Omega) and the ADB branch (15+30=45 Ω15 + 30 = 45\ \Omega) in parallel across the 20 V source. KVL on each outer loop is straightforward with no C–D branch to worry about. This is answer B. A introduces a fabricated condition — that RgR_g must equal some geometric mean for balance. This is simply not a real requirement. The standard cross-product R1R4=R2R3R_1 R_4 = R_2 R_3 (equivalent to the ratio condition) is both necessary and sufficient for balance; RgR_g is irrelevant. C correctly identifies the balance condition but then contradicts itself by claiming current flows anyway. Current requires a potential difference — if VC=VDV_C = V_D, then ΔV=0\Delta V = 0 and Ohm's law gives Ig=0I_g = 0. D confuses branch resistance equality (R1+R3=R2+R4R_1 + R_3 = R_2 + R_4) with the actual balance condition. Equal total branch resistances are not required; equal ratios within each branch are. Strategy tip: Memorize the ratio form R1/R3=R2/R4R_1/R_3 = R_2/R_4 — it's faster than the cross-product and directly shows you why the middle potentials equalize.