Physics 2 Quiz: Electric Dipoles
14 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Electric DipolesQuestion 1 of 14

A permanent electric dipole with dipole moment p\vec{p} is placed in a non-uniform external electric field. The field is stronger on one side of the dipole than the other. A student claims: 'Because the net torque on the dipole is zero when p\vec{p} is aligned with E\vec{E}, the dipole is in equilibrium and will remain stationary.'

Which of the following identifies the critical flaw in the student's reasoning?

The student correctly identifies the torque condition but ignores that a non-uniform field exerts a net force on the dipole even when p\vec{p} is aligned with E\vec{E}, so the dipole accelerates translationally and is not in static equilibrium.
The student is wrong because the torque on a dipole aligned with E\vec{E} is not zero; torque is zero only when p\vec{p} is anti-parallel to E\vec{E}, making the student's entire premise incorrect.
The student is wrong because in any non-uniform field the torque cannot be zero for any orientation of p\vec{p}, so the stated alignment condition is physically impossible.
The student correctly identifies both the torque and force conditions; the only flaw is that the student does not specify whether the equilibrium is stable or unstable, not whether equilibrium exists.
← Back to quizzes

Physics 2 Quiz

Physics 2 Quiz: Electric Dipoles

Practice Electric Dipoles in Physics 2 with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Electric Dipoles, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Physics 2.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A permanent electric dipole with dipole moment p\vec{p} is placed in a non-uniform external electric field. The field is stronger on one side of the dipole than the other. A student claims: 'Because the net torque on the dipole is zero when p\vec{p} is aligned with E\vec{E}, the dipole is in equilibrium and will remain stationary.'

Which of the following identifies the critical flaw in the student's reasoning?

  1. The student correctly identifies the torque condition but ignores that a non-uniform field exerts a net force on the dipole even when p\vec{p} is aligned with E\vec{E}, so the dipole accelerates translationally and is not in static equilibrium. (correct answer)
  2. The student is wrong because the torque on a dipole aligned with E\vec{E} is not zero; torque is zero only when p\vec{p} is anti-parallel to E\vec{E}, making the student's entire premise incorrect.
  3. The student is wrong because in any non-uniform field the torque cannot be zero for any orientation of p\vec{p}, so the stated alignment condition is physically impossible.
  4. The student correctly identifies both the torque and force conditions; the only flaw is that the student does not specify whether the equilibrium is stable or unstable, not whether equilibrium exists.
Explanation: When analyzing dipole behavior, you need to separately evaluate two conditions for true equilibrium: the torque condition (rotational) and the net force condition (translational). A common trap is assuming that zero torque alone means the dipole is stationary. The torque on a dipole is τ=p×E\vec{\tau} = \vec{p} \times \vec{E}, which is indeed zero when p\vec{p} is aligned with E\vec{E} — so the student's torque reasoning is correct. However, the net force on a dipole in a non-uniform field is F=(pE)\vec{F} = \nabla(\vec{p} \cdot \vec{E}), which is generally nonzero even when the dipole is perfectly aligned. The stronger field on one side pulls the positive charge more than it pushes the negative charge (or vice versa), creating a net translational force. True static equilibrium requires both τ=0\vec{\tau} = 0 and F=0\vec{F} = 0, and the student only checks one condition. This makes A correct. B is wrong because it reverses the torque physics. Torque is zero when p\vec{p} is parallel to E\vec{E} (not anti-parallel); the student's premise about torque is actually valid, so this distractor misidentifies the error. C is wrong because torque absolutely can be zero in a non-uniform field — field non-uniformity affects force, not the torque formula, which depends only on local alignment. D is wrong because equilibrium genuinely does not exist here. A net translational force means no static equilibrium at all, stable or unstable — so the flaw goes deeper than merely labeling the type of equilibrium. Study tip: Whenever a question mentions a non-uniform field and a dipole, immediately ask yourself two separate questions: Is torque zero? Is net force zero? Non-uniformity is almost always a signal that the force condition is the hidden piece being tested.

Question 2

A rigid electric dipole p=pz^\vec{p} = p\hat{z} is placed at the origin in an external electric field E=E0(1+αx)z^\vec{E} = E_0(1 + \alpha x)\hat{z}, where α\alpha is a small positive constant and E0>0E_0 > 0. The dipole is oriented along z^\hat{z} and is free to translate but not rotate. Which statement best describes the translational motion of the dipole?

  1. The dipole accelerates in the x^-\hat{x} direction because systems move to minimize potential energy, and the region of higher field strength has greater energy density, so the dipole is repelled from it.
  2. The dipole remains stationary because p\vec{p} is along z^\hat{z} while the field varies along x^\hat{x}; since there is no field gradient in the direction of p\vec{p}, the forces on +q+q and q-q are equal and opposite, yielding zero net force.
  3. The dipole accelerates in the +z^+\hat{z} direction because the positive charge at z>0z > 0 experiences a stronger field than the negative charge at z<0z < 0, producing a net upward force along the dipole axis.
  4. The dipole accelerates in the +x^+\hat{x} direction because the field gradient Ez/x=E0α\partial E_z/\partial x = E_0\alpha produces a net force Fx=pαE0F_x = p\alpha E_0 via F=(pE)\vec{F} = \nabla(\vec{p}\cdot\vec{E}). (correct answer)
Explanation: When a permanent dipole sits in a non-uniform electric field, the key formula to reach for is F=(pE)\vec{F} = \nabla(\vec{p} \cdot \vec{E}). This tells you the net force comes from how the field varies in space — not just its direction relative to p\vec{p}. Here, p=pz^\vec{p} = p\hat{z} and E=E0(1+αx)z^\vec{E} = E_0(1 + \alpha x)\hat{z}, so the dot product is pE=pE0(1+αx)\vec{p} \cdot \vec{E} = pE_0(1 + \alpha x). Taking the gradient gives F=[pE0(1+αx)]=pE0αx^\vec{F} = \nabla[pE_0(1+\alpha x)] = pE_0\alpha\,\hat{x}. The dipole feels a net force in the +x^+\hat{x} direction — toward the region of stronger field — confirming D is correct. A is wrong on two counts: dipoles in external fields are attracted toward stronger field regions (not repelled), and the energy-density argument here misapplies thermodynamic intuition to a mechanical force problem. B contains a subtle but critical error: it conflates "field varies along x^\hat{x}" with "no gradient relevant to p\vec{p}." In fact, Ez/x0\partial E_z/\partial x \neq 0 is exactly the gradient that drives the force — the gradient doesn't need to be along z^\hat{z} to matter. C sounds plausible but incorrectly imagines the +q+q and q-q charges displaced along z^\hat{z}, where the field is uniform (no zz-dependence in EE), so those forces cancel perfectly. A useful rule of thumb: the net force on a dipole points along the gradient of the field component parallel to p\vec{p}, regardless of which spatial direction that gradient points. Always check (pE)\nabla(\vec{p}\cdot\vec{E}) explicitly rather than relying on geometric intuition.

Question 3

A dipole in uniform EE is released from rest at 60°. Work done by EE before first reaching alignment?

  1. pE/2-pE/2
  2. +pE+pE
  3. pE-pE
  4. +pE/2+pE/2 (correct answer)
Explanation: The dipole's potential energy is U = -pE cos(theta). At 60 degrees, U = -pE/2; at alignment, U = -pE. Work done by the field equals the decrease in potential energy: (-pE/2) - (-pE) = +pE/2. The tempting wrong answer is -pE/2, which is the change in potential energy, not the work done by the field.

Question 4

For a dipole in uniform EE, torque is half its maximum when the acute angle between pp and EE is

  1. 30° (correct answer)
  2. 45°
  3. 60°
  4. 90°
Explanation: Torque equals pE sin(theta), with theta the angle between p and E. Maximum torque occurs at 90 degrees, so half maximum means sin(theta) = 1/2. The acute angle whose sine is 1/2 is 30 degrees. The tempting 60 degrees is wrong because half of 90 degrees is not the same as half the sine value.

Question 5

A dipole in uniform EE is slightly displaced and returns to its original orientation. That orientation was

  1. antiparallel to field
  2. parallel to field (correct answer)
  3. perpendicular to field
  4. 45 degrees to field
Explanation: A dipole's potential energy is lowest when its moment is parallel to the field, so that is the stable equilibrium. If you displace it slightly, the torque pushes it back to parallel. The tempting wrong answer is antiparallel, but that is unstable: the slightest displacement makes it rotate farther away, not back.

Question 6

Dipole p=px^\mathbf{p}=p\hat{x} in E=Ey^\mathbf{E}=E\hat{y}. Torque direction?

  1. z^-\hat{z}
  2. +z^+\hat{z} (correct answer)
  3. +y^+\hat{y}
  4. x^-\hat{x}
Explanation: Torque is p x E. With p along +x and E along +y, x cross y is +z, so the torque points toward +z. The tempting wrong pick is -z, which comes from reversing the cross-product order or flipping the right-hand rule; dipole torque is defined as p x E, not E x p.

Question 7

Far from a dipole, on its perpendicular bisector, the field is

  1. parallel to pp; r2r^{-2}
  2. opposite to pp; r2r^{-2}
  3. opposite to pp; r3r^{-3} (correct answer)
  4. parallel to pp; r3r^{-3}
Explanation: At any point on the perpendicular bisector, the two charges' horizontal field components cancel, leaving a resultant pointing opposite to the dipole moment p. The far-field dipole strength falls as 1/r^3, not 1/r^2. The tempting mistake is thinking the field points parallel to p or that it follows the point-charge 1/r^2 law; both miss the dipole nature.

Question 8

An electric dipole consists of charges +q+q and q-q separated by distance dd, with the dipole moment p\vec{p} pointing from q-q to +q+q. A point P lies on the perpendicular bisector of the dipole at distance rdr \gg d from the center. Which of the following correctly describes the direction of the electric field at P due to the dipole?

  1. The field at P points in the same direction as p\vec{p}, because the positive charge dominates along the bisector axis at large distances.
  2. The field at P points antiparallel to p\vec{p}, because both charges contribute field components along the bisector that partially cancel, leaving a net component opposing p\vec{p}. (correct answer)
  3. The field at P points radially outward from the center of the dipole, because the bisector is equidistant from both charges and their tangential contributions vanish.
  4. The field at P points parallel to p\vec{p} because at large distances the dipole looks like a single positive charge located at the center of mass of the charge distribution.
Explanation: When analyzing the electric field of a dipole at a point on its perpendicular bisector, you need to carefully track the vector contributions from each charge separately before combining them. Place the dipole vertically, with +q+q on top and q-q on bottom, so p\vec{p} points upward. Point P lies horizontally to the side. The field from +q+q points away from +q+q (diagonally up-and-away from P's perspective), while the field from q-q points toward q-q (diagonally down-and-away). Because P is equidistant from both charges, the magnitudes are equal. When you decompose these into components, the horizontal components (pointing away from the dipole center) cancel each other exactly. The surviving vertical components both point downward — that is, antiparallel to p\vec{p}. This confirms B is correct: the net field at P opposes p\vec{p}, with magnitude proportional to p/r3p/r^3 at large distances. A is wrong because it assumes the positive charge "dominates," ignoring that both charges contribute equally at equal distance — the direction, not magnitude, is what matters here. D makes the same conceptual error: a dipole never reduces to a single charge at large distances; it remains a dipole whose field falls off as 1/r31/r^3, not 1/r21/r^2. C is wrong because the field does not point radially outward — that would require the tangential components to cancel, but it's actually the radial components that cancel, leaving a tangential (antiparallel to p\vec{p}) net field. As a study tip, always decompose dipole fields into components at the point of interest — direction questions are almost never answerable by intuition alone.

Question 9

An electric dipole with moment p\vec{p} is in a uniform electric field of magnitude EE. The dipole is initially at θ=180°\theta = 180° (anti-parallel to the field) and is given an infinitesimally small angular perturbation. The dipole is free to rotate about its center with moment of inertia II.

Which of the following correctly characterizes the equilibrium at θ=180°\theta = 180° and predicts what happens after the perturbation?

  1. The equilibrium at 180°180° is stable because the torque at θ\theta slightly less than 180°180° acts to restore the dipole back toward 180°180°, so it oscillates about that angle indefinitely.
  2. The equilibrium at 180°180° is unstable because U=pEcosθU = -pE\cos\theta is at a maximum there; after the perturbation the dipole will undergo simple harmonic oscillations about θ=0°\theta = 0° with angular frequency ω=pE/I\omega = \sqrt{pE/I}.
  3. The equilibrium at 180°180° is unstable because UU is at a maximum there; after the perturbation the dipole accelerates away from 180°180° and, with no damping, overshoots and oscillates about θ=0°\theta = 0° with large amplitude—not simple harmonic motion. (correct answer)
  4. The equilibrium at 180°180° is neutrally stable because the torque magnitude τ=pEsinθ|\tau| = pE|\sin\theta| is symmetric about both 0° and 180°180°, so the dipole has no preferred rotational direction after the perturbation.
Explanation: When analyzing equilibrium stability in rotational systems, ask yourself two things: where is the potential energy extremum, and what happens to the motion after equilibrium is broken? The dipole's potential energy is U=pEcosθU = -pE\cos\theta. At θ=180°\theta = 180°, cos(180°)=1\cos(180°) = -1, so U=+pEU = +pE—a maximum. This immediately tells you the equilibrium is unstable: any perturbation causes the system to roll away from that configuration, like a ball balanced on a hilltop. The restoring torque τ=pEsinθ\tau = -pE\sin\theta actually pushes the dipole away from 180°180° rather than back toward it. After the perturbation, the dipole accelerates toward θ=0°\theta = 0°, gaining kinetic energy. With no damping, energy is conserved—the dipole overshoots 0° and swings to large angles on the other side. This is large-amplitude oscillation, not simple harmonic motion. SHM only applies when oscillations are small enough that sinθθ\sin\theta \approx \theta, which requires proximity to a stable equilibrium (like θ=0°\theta = 0°) with small initial displacement. The frequency ω=pE/I\omega = \sqrt{pE/I} only describes small oscillations near 0°. This makes C correct. A is wrong because 180°180° is unstable, not stable—the torque pushes the dipole away from 180°180°, not back toward it. B correctly identifies the instability but incorrectly applies the SHM formula; after launching from near 180°180°, the dipole arrives at 0° with substantial kinetic energy, so oscillations are large-amplitude. D is wrong because torque symmetry doesn't imply neutral stability—the energy landscape clearly has a maximum at 180°180° and a minimum at 0°. Study tip: Always check which extremum you're at—stable equilibria sit at potential energy minima, and the SHM formula only applies for small oscillations near those minima.

Question 10

A molecule is modeled as an electric dipole with moment p\vec{p} in a uniform external electric field E\vec{E}. The dipole starts at angle θ0=90°\theta_0 = 90° from the field direction (perpendicular to E\vec{E}) and is released from rest. The dipole can rotate freely about its center.

Which of the following correctly describes the kinetic energy of the dipole when it reaches θ=0°\theta = 0° (aligned with the field), assuming no energy dissipation?

  1. K=0K = 0, because at θ=0°\theta = 0° the dipole is aligned with the field and the torque is zero; with no torque acting at the final position, the dipole must be instantaneously at rest.
  2. K=2pEK = 2pE, because the potential energy at 90°90° is +pE+pE and at 0° is pE-pE, giving a total decrease of 2pE2pE that converts entirely to kinetic energy.
  3. K=12pEK = \tfrac{1}{2}pE, because only the component of the torque aligned with the angular velocity does work, and averaging τ=pEsinθ\tau = pE\sin\theta over the rotation from 90°90° to 0° gives an effective work of 12pE\tfrac{1}{2}pE.
  4. K=pEK = pE, because the potential energy decreases from U(90°)=0U(90°) = 0 to U(0°)=pEU(0°) = -pE, and energy conservation requires this decrease to appear entirely as kinetic energy. (correct answer)
Explanation: When a dipole rotates in an electric field, treat it like any other energy conservation problem: the work done on the system equals the change in kinetic energy, and potential energy "lost" becomes kinetic energy "gained." The potential energy of a dipole in a uniform field is U=pEcosθU = -pE\cos\theta. At θ0=90°\theta_0 = 90°, U=pEcos(90°)=0U = -pE\cos(90°) = 0. At θ=0°\theta = 0°, U=pEcos(0°)=pEU = -pE\cos(0°) = -pE. The potential energy decreases by pEpE, so by conservation of energy, the kinetic energy gained is exactly K=pEK = pE. That makes D correct. A confuses the torque at the final position with the work done during the entire journey. Yes, torque is zero at θ=0°\theta = 0°, but that just means the dipole stops accelerating there — it doesn't mean the dipole is at rest. The dipole has been accelerating the entire way from 90°90° to 0°, accumulating kinetic energy. B uses U(90°)=+pEU(90°) = +pE, which is wrong. Plugging θ=90°\theta = 90° into U=pEcosθU = -pE\cos\theta gives zero, not +pE+pE. This error doubles the actual energy change, inflating the answer to 2pE2pE. C invents a shortcut that doesn't exist. Averaging torque over angle is not a valid method for calculating work in rotational systems. The correct approach is W=τdθW = \int \tau\, d\theta, which is equivalent to using ΔU\Delta U — and that integral yields pEpE, not 12pE\tfrac{1}{2}pE. Study tip: Always write out U=pEcosθU = -pE\cos\theta explicitly and plug in your angles carefully. The negative sign is the most common source of errors on dipole energy questions.

Question 11

An ideal electric dipole p\vec{p} is located at the origin. Point A is on the dipole axis at distance rr from the center. Point B is on the perpendicular bisector at the same distance rr. Let EAE_A and EBE_B be the magnitudes of the electric field at points A and B, respectively. Which of the following is correct?

  1. EA=EBE_A = E_B because both points are at the same distance rr from the dipole, and the field magnitude of a dipole depends only on rr at large distances.
  2. EA=2EBE_A = 2E_B because the axial field is 2p4πϵ0r3\frac{2p}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^3} and the equatorial field is p4πϵ0r3\frac{p}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^3}, giving a ratio of exactly 2. (correct answer)
  3. EA=2EBE_A = \sqrt{2}\, E_B because the axial and equatorial fields differ by a factor related to the angular dependence 1+3cos2θ\sqrt{1+3\cos^2\theta} evaluated at θ=0°\theta = 0° and θ=90°\theta = 90°.
  4. EA=4EBE_A = 4E_B because the axial field is proportional to 2p/r32p/r^3 and the equatorial field is proportional to p/(2r3)p/(2r^3), so the ratio is 4p/p=44p/p = 4.
Explanation: When you encounter a dipole field problem, your first instinct should be to recall the two key formulas — one for points on the axis and one for the perpendicular bisector (the equatorial plane). For an ideal dipole of moment pp, the axial field (along the dipole axis, θ=0°\theta = 0°) is: EA=14πϵ02pr3E_A = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{2p}{r^3} The equatorial field (on the perpendicular bisector, θ=90°\theta = 90°) is: EB=14πϵ0pr3E_B = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p}{r^3} Dividing these directly gives EA/EB=2E_A / E_B = 2, confirming that B is correct: EA=2EBE_A = 2E_B. This factor of 2 comes from the geometry of how the two charge contributions add along the axis versus partially cancel on the equator. A is wrong because it assumes dipole field strength depends only on distance — it doesn't. The angular position matters fundamentally; a dipole is inherently anisotropic. Spherical symmetry applies to monopoles, not dipoles. C is wrong but subtly so. The general dipole field magnitude is E=p4πϵ0r31+3cos2θE = \frac{p}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^3}\sqrt{1+3\cos^2\theta}. At θ=0°\theta = 0°, this gives 4=2\sqrt{4} = 2; at θ=90°\theta = 90°, it gives 1=1\sqrt{1} = 1. The ratio is still exactly 2 — not 2\sqrt{2}. Choice C misapplies the formula by forgetting to evaluate the square root fully. D is wrong because it incorrectly states the equatorial field as p/(2r3)p/(2r^3) — that's a fabricated expression with no physical basis. Your takeaway: memorize both dipole field formulas and the factor-of-2 ratio between them. It appears on exams more often than students expect.

Question 12

Two identical electric dipoles, each with dipole moment magnitude pp, are placed along the same axis (the x-axis). Dipole 1 is at the origin with p1=px^\vec{p}_1 = p\hat{x}. Dipole 2 is at position x=Rx = R with p2=px^\vec{p}_2 = p\hat{x}. Both dipoles are free to rotate but are held at fixed positions. The separation RR is much larger than the charge separation within each dipole.

What is the potential energy of interaction between the two dipoles, and is their parallel alignment (both pointing in the +x^+\hat{x} direction) stable or unstable?

  1. U=2p24πϵ0R3U = -\frac{2p^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R^3}; the configuration is unstable because any perturbation causes the dipoles to rotate toward an anti-parallel arrangement, which would lower the energy even further below this value.
  2. U=+p24πϵ0R3U = +\frac{p^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R^3}; the configuration is unstable because the positive energy means the dipoles repel rotationally, and any perturbation drives them toward anti-parallel alignment to lower the energy.
  3. U=2p24πϵ0R3U = -\frac{2p^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R^3}; the configuration is stable because this energy is a minimum—a small angular perturbation increases UU, and the resulting restoring torque returns the dipoles to alignment. (correct answer)
  4. U=p24πϵ0R3U = -\frac{p^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R^3}; the configuration is stable because the axial field of dipole 1 is parallel to p2\vec{p}_2, the torque on dipole 2 is zero, and small perturbations produce a restoring torque.
Explanation: When two dipoles sit end-to-end along the same axis, you need two tools: the formula for the electric field of a dipole along its axis, and the formula for the potential energy of a dipole in an external field. The axial field of dipole 1 at distance RR points in the +x^+\hat{x} direction with magnitude E=2p4πϵ0R3E = \frac{2p}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R^3}. The potential energy of dipole 2 in this field is U=p2E=p2p4πϵ0R3=2p24πϵ0R3U = -\vec{p}_2 \cdot \vec{E} = -p \cdot \frac{2p}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R^3} = -\frac{2p^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R^3}. This is a negative (minimum) energy for parallel alignment, which confirms answer C. Stability follows from the energy landscape: if you perturb either dipole by a small angle θ\theta, the dot product p2E\vec{p}_2 \cdot \vec{E} decreases, so UU rises above the minimum, and the resulting torque τ=p×E\vec{\tau} = \vec{p} \times \vec{E} acts to restore alignment. That is the textbook definition of a stable equilibrium. Answer A gets the energy right but inverts the stability logic. Negative energy does not imply instability — it means you are at a minimum, which is precisely why the configuration is stable. Answer B states a positive energy, which would correspond to anti-parallel alignment on axis, not parallel. It also misidentifies that configuration's stability. Answer D uses the correct sign and correctly notes zero torque at equilibrium, but it drops a factor of 2, writing p24πϵ0R3-\frac{p^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R^3} instead of 2p24πϵ0R3-\frac{2p^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R^3}. That factor of 2 is the signature of the axial field versus the equatorial field — memorize both. Study tip: For dipole–dipole problems, always identify whether you're on the axis or the equatorial plane first; the field magnitude differs by exactly a factor of 2, and forgetting this is the most common calculation error on this topic.

Question 13

Two point charges +2q+2q and q-q are separated by a distance dd. An observer at a very large distance rdr \gg d measures the electric field. Which of the following best describes how the field falls off with distance rr at leading order?

  1. The field falls off as r2r^{-2} at leading order because the net charge is +q0+q \neq 0, and at large distances the system appears as a point charge regardless of the dipole contribution. (correct answer)
  2. The field falls off as r3r^{-3} at leading order because the net charge is zero when properly decomposed: the +2q+2q and q-q form a net dipole, and the monopole term vanishes.
  3. The field falls off as r3r^{-3} at leading order because the two charges form a pure dipole with moment p=qdp = qd, and the monopole term is always zero for any two-charge system.
  4. The field falls off as r4r^{-4} at leading order because the system has both a nonzero monopole and a nonzero dipole moment, and the dominant term at large distances arises from their interference, which decays faster than either alone.
Explanation: When analyzing the electric field from a charge distribution at large distances, the key tool is the multipole expansion. This framework decomposes the field into contributions ordered by how fast they decay: monopole (r2\sim r^{-2}), dipole (r3\sim r^{-3}), quadrupole (r4\sim r^{-4}), and so on. The dominant term at large distances is always the lowest-order nonzero term. For the system +2q+2q and q-q, first check the net charge: Qnet=+2q+(q)=+q0Q_{net} = +2q + (-q) = +q \neq 0. A nonzero net charge means the monopole term survives. Since the monopole field falls off as r2r^{-2} and the dipole falls off as r3r^{-3}, the monopole term completely dominates at large rr. The field therefore falls off as r2r^{-2}, making A correct. Choice B claims the net charge is "zero when properly decomposed," which is simply false — decomposing into a dipole doesn't erase the physical net charge of +q+q. Choice C makes the same error while adding a further misconception: a two-charge system is only a pure dipole when the charges are equal and opposite (e.g., +q+q and q-q). Here, the charges are unequal, so there is no cancellation of the monopole. Choice D describes a scenario involving interference between monopole and dipole terms producing r4r^{-4} decay — this doesn't reflect how multipole expansions work; terms don't "interfere" to create faster decay, they simply add independently. Study tip: Always check QnetQ_{net} first. If it's nonzero, the answer is r2r^{-2} — no further analysis needed.

Question 14

The electric potential at a point P located at distance rr from the center of an ideal electric dipole p\vec{p} is given by V=pcosθ4πϵ0r2V = \frac{p\cos\theta}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2}, where θ\theta is the angle between p\vec{p} and the position vector r\vec{r} to P. A student wants to find the component of the electric field in the θ^\hat{\theta} direction (the polar direction). Which of the following is correct?

  1. Eθ=Vθ=psinθ4πϵ0r2E_\theta = -\frac{\partial V}{\partial \theta} = \frac{p\sin\theta}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2}, obtained by differentiating VV with respect to θ\theta and negating.
  2. Eθ=1rVθ=psinθ4πϵ0r3E_\theta = -\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial V}{\partial \theta} = \frac{p\sin\theta}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^3}, obtained using the correct spherical-coordinate gradient and negating. (correct answer)
  3. Eθ=+1rVθ=psinθ4πϵ0r3E_\theta = +\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial V}{\partial \theta} = -\frac{p\sin\theta}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^3}, because the field component in the polar direction is co-directional with the potential gradient.
  4. Eθ=Vrsinθ=2psinθcosθ4πϵ0r3E_\theta = -\frac{\partial V}{\partial r}\sin\theta = \frac{2p\sin\theta\cos\theta}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^3}, obtained by projecting the radial derivative of VV onto the polar direction.
Explanation: Whenever you encounter electric field problems in spherical coordinates, your first instinct should be to recall the full gradient formula — not the Cartesian one. The electric field relates to potential via E=V\vec{E} = -\nabla V, and in spherical coordinates, the gradient has a critical scaling factor: the θ^\hat{\theta} component is 1rVθ-\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial V}{\partial \theta}, not simply Vθ-\frac{\partial V}{\partial \theta}. That factor of 1r\frac{1}{r} exists because θ\theta is an angular coordinate — a change in angle corresponds to a physical arc length of rdθr\,d\theta, so the spatial rate of change must be divided by rr to have the correct units of V/m. Applying this to the dipole potential V=pcosθ4πϵ0r2V = \frac{p\cos\theta}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2}, you differentiate with respect to θ\theta: Vθ=psinθ4πϵ0r2\frac{\partial V}{\partial \theta} = -\frac{p\sin\theta}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2}. Dividing by rr and negating gives Eθ=1rVθ=psinθ4πϵ0r3E_\theta = -\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial V}{\partial \theta} = \frac{p\sin\theta}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^3}, confirming B is correct. Choice A forgets the 1r\frac{1}{r} factor entirely, leaving the answer with the wrong rr-dependence (r2r^{-2} instead of r3r^{-3}) and wrong units. Choice C drops the negative sign — the field points opposite to the potential gradient, always. Choice D incorrectly projects the radial derivative onto the polar direction using a sinθ\sin\theta factor, which has no justification from the gradient formula. A reliable study tip: memorize the spherical gradient in full — V=Vrr^+1rVθθ^+1rsinθVϕϕ^\nabla V = \frac{\partial V}{\partial r}\hat{r} + \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial V}{\partial \theta}\hat{\theta} + \frac{1}{r\sin\theta}\frac{\partial V}{\partial \phi}\hat{\phi} — and always check that each term has units of V/m before proceeding.