Physics 2 Quiz: Battery Emf And Internal Resistance
9 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Battery Emf And Internal ResistanceQuestion 1 of 9

A battery with emf E\mathcal{E} and internal resistance rr is connected to an external resistor RR. A student measures the terminal voltage VTV_T as a function of current II drawn from the battery and obtains a linear graph. The student extrapolates the graph to find the y-intercept and x-intercept.

Which of the following correctly identifies the physical meaning of the y-intercept and x-intercept of the VTV_T vs. II graph?

The y-intercept equals E\mathcal{E} (the open-circuit emf) and the x-intercept equals E/r\mathcal{E}/r (the short-circuit current), because VT=EIrV_T = \mathcal{E} - Ir predicts these values at I=0I = 0 and VT=0V_T = 0, respectively.
The y-intercept equals EIr\mathcal{E} - Ir evaluated at maximum load and the x-intercept equals rr, because at zero current the voltage drop across the internal resistance vanishes and rr sets the scale of the current axis.
The y-intercept equals the terminal voltage under full load and the x-intercept equals E/R\mathcal{E}/R, because the external resistance RR determines how much current flows at zero terminal voltage rather than the internal resistance rr.
The y-intercept equals E+Ir\mathcal{E} + Ir and the x-intercept equals r/Er/\mathcal{E}, because the terminal voltage rises above the emf when current flows due to back-emf effects inside the battery under charging conditions.
← Back to quizzes

Physics 2 Quiz

Physics 2 Quiz: Battery Emf And Internal Resistance

Practice Battery Emf And Internal Resistance in Physics 2 with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Battery Emf And Internal Resistance, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Physics 2.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A battery with emf E\mathcal{E} and internal resistance rr is connected to an external resistor RR. A student measures the terminal voltage VTV_T as a function of current II drawn from the battery and obtains a linear graph. The student extrapolates the graph to find the y-intercept and x-intercept.

Which of the following correctly identifies the physical meaning of the y-intercept and x-intercept of the VTV_T vs. II graph?

  1. The y-intercept equals E\mathcal{E} (the open-circuit emf) and the x-intercept equals E/r\mathcal{E}/r (the short-circuit current), because VT=EIrV_T = \mathcal{E} - Ir predicts these values at I=0I = 0 and VT=0V_T = 0, respectively. (correct answer)
  2. The y-intercept equals EIr\mathcal{E} - Ir evaluated at maximum load and the x-intercept equals rr, because at zero current the voltage drop across the internal resistance vanishes and rr sets the scale of the current axis.
  3. The y-intercept equals the terminal voltage under full load and the x-intercept equals E/R\mathcal{E}/R, because the external resistance RR determines how much current flows at zero terminal voltage rather than the internal resistance rr.
  4. The y-intercept equals E+Ir\mathcal{E} + Ir and the x-intercept equals r/Er/\mathcal{E}, because the terminal voltage rises above the emf when current flows due to back-emf effects inside the battery under charging conditions.
Explanation: Whenever you see a question about a battery's terminal voltage graph, your anchor equation should be VT=EIrV_T = \mathcal{E} - Ir. This is a linear equation in slope-intercept form, where VTV_T is on the y-axis and II is on the x-axis. Recognizing this structure immediately tells you everything about the intercepts. The slope is r-r (negative internal resistance), the y-intercept is E\mathcal{E} (set I=0I = 0, so VT=EV_T = \mathcal{E}), and the x-intercept is found by setting VT=0V_T = 0: 0=EIrI=E/r0 = \mathcal{E} - Ir \Rightarrow I = \mathcal{E}/r. This short-circuit current represents the maximum current the battery could theoretically deliver if the external resistance were zero. Answer A captures both intercepts correctly and explains the physical reasoning behind each — making it the right choice. Answer B incorrectly claims the x-intercept equals rr. The x-intercept has units of current (amperes), not ohms — this is a unit mismatch and a conceptual error. Answer C replaces rr with RR in the short-circuit current formula. But when VT=0V_T = 0, the external resistance is irrelevant — only internal resistance rr limits current. Answer D describes a charging battery (where VT=E+IrV_T = \mathcal{E} + Ir), which is the opposite scenario. A discharging battery loses terminal voltage as current increases, not gains it. Study tip: Memorize VT=EIrV_T = \mathcal{E} - Ir as your go-to battery equation and always treat it like y=mx+by = mx + b. Any graph question about terminal voltage is really just asking you to read the intercepts of this line.

Question 2

A battery is being charged by an external source. The battery has emf E=12 V\mathcal{E} = 12 \text{ V} and internal resistance r=0.5 Ωr = 0.5 \text{ } \Omega. The charger forces a current of I=4 AI = 4 \text{ A} into the battery.

What is the terminal voltage of the battery during charging, and which expression correctly represents the power balance inside the battery?

  1. VT=10 VV_T = 10 \text{ V}; power stored chemically =EI=48 W= \mathcal{E}I = 48 \text{ W}, power dissipated in rr =I2r=8 W= I^2 r = 8 \text{ W}, and input power from charger =VTI=40 W= V_T I = 40 \text{ W}. Energy is conserved because the terminal voltage is lower than the emf during charging, so the charger supplies less power than what is stored.
  2. VT=14 VV_T = 14 \text{ V}; input power from charger =VTI=56 W= V_T I = 56 \text{ W}, power stored chemically =EI=48 W= \mathcal{E}I = 48 \text{ W}, and power dissipated in rr =I2r=8 W= I^2 r = 8 \text{ W}, satisfying conservation of energy: 56=48+856 = 48 + 8. (correct answer)
  3. VT=13 VV_T = 13 \text{ V}; input power from charger =VTI=52 W= V_T I = 52 \text{ W}, power stored chemically =EI=48 W= \mathcal{E}I = 48 \text{ W}, and power dissipated in rr =I2r=4 W= I^2 r = 4 \text{ W}, satisfying conservation of energy: 52=48+452 = 48 + 4. The terminal voltage exceeds the emf because the charger reverses the internal current direction, halving the resistive losses.
  4. VT=12 VV_T = 12 \text{ V}; the terminal voltage equals the emf during charging because the internal resistance only drops voltage during discharge. The charger supplies exactly EI=48 W\mathcal{E}I = 48 \text{ W}, all of which is stored chemically with no resistive losses in the internal resistance.
Explanation: When a battery is being charged, current is forced into it against its emf — this reverses the role of the internal resistance compared to discharging. Instead of the internal resistance reducing the terminal voltage below the emf, it now adds to it. The terminal voltage during charging is: VT=E+Ir=12+(4)(0.5)=14 VV_T = \mathcal{E} + Ir = 12 + (4)(0.5) = 14 \text{ V} The charger must push current through both the battery's emf and its internal resistance, so it supplies more voltage — and more power — than the emf alone. The power balance confirms this: input power =VTI=(14)(4)=56 W= V_T I = (14)(4) = 56 \text{ W}, which splits into chemical storage =EI=(12)(4)=48 W= \mathcal{E}I = (12)(4) = 48 \text{ W} and resistive loss =I2r=(16)(0.5)=8 W= I^2r = (16)(0.5) = 8 \text{ W}. Since 48+8=5648 + 8 = 56, energy is perfectly conserved. This is answer B. Answer A gets the direction exactly backwards — it treats charging like discharging, subtracting IrIr instead of adding it, giving VT=10 VV_T = 10 \text{ V}. The power accounting then breaks down entirely. Answer C uses the right logic (adding IrIr) but makes an arithmetic error: I2r=(16)(0.5)=8 WI^2r = (16)(0.5) = 8 \text{ W}, not 4 W4 \text{ W}, so its energy balance fails and the terminal voltage of 13 V is wrong. Answer D incorrectly claims internal resistance only matters during discharge. In reality, IrIr always creates a voltage drop across the internal resistance regardless of current direction. Study tip: Always ask yourself — is the battery charging or discharging? Discharging: VT=EIrV_T = \mathcal{E} - Ir. Charging: VT=E+IrV_T = \mathcal{E} + Ir. Getting this direction right is the entire key to these problems.

Question 3

A battery of emf E=6.0 V\mathcal{E} = 6.0 \text{ V} and unknown internal resistance rr is connected to two resistors: R1=4  ΩR_1 = 4 \text{ }\ \Omega and R2=6  ΩR_2 = 6 \text{ }\ \Omega in parallel with each other. The terminal voltage of the battery is measured to be VT=5.0 VV_T = 5.0 \text{ V}.

What is the internal resistance rr of the battery?

  1. r=2.0  Ωr = 2.0 \text{ }\ \Omega, found by noting that the voltage drop across rr is 1.0 V1.0 \text{ V} and the current is estimated using only one branch: IVT/R1=5.0/4=1.25 AI \approx V_T/R_1 = 5.0/4 = 1.25 \text{ A} (ignoring the second branch), giving r=1.0/1.25=0.80  Ωr = 1.0/1.25 = 0.80 \text{ }\ \Omega, but then corrected upward to 2.0  Ω2.0 \text{ }\ \Omega by the parallel branch factor.
  2. r=0.60  Ωr = 0.60 \text{ }\ \Omega, found by adding R1R_1 and R2R_2 in series to get Req=10  ΩR_{eq} = 10 \text{ }\ \Omega, computing I=E/(Req+r)I = \mathcal{E}/(R_{eq} + r) and solving with VT=EIrV_T = \mathcal{E} - Ir, which gives r=EReq(EVT)1Reqr = \mathcal{E} R_{eq}(\mathcal{E} - V_T)^{-1} - R_{eq}.
  3. r=0.48  Ωr = 0.48 \text{ }\ \Omega, found by computing the equivalent external resistance Req=(4×6)/(4+6)=2.4  ΩR_{eq} = (4 \times 6)/(4+6) = 2.4 \text{ }\ \Omega, the total current I=VT/Req=5.0/2.42.08 AI = V_T/R_{eq} = 5.0/2.4 \approx 2.08 \text{ A}, and then applying r=(EVT)/I=1.0/2.080.48  Ωr = (\mathcal{E} - V_T)/I = 1.0/2.08 \approx 0.48 \text{ }\ \Omega. (correct answer)
  4. r=0.48  Ωr = 0.48 \text{ }\ \Omega, but this result assumes the terminal voltage equals the voltage across R1R_1 only; the voltage across R2R_2 is different because the resistors are in parallel, requiring separate current calculations for each branch before summing.
Explanation: When a battery with internal resistance powers an external circuit, you can think of it as a voltage divider: the emf splits between the internal resistance rr and the external load. The key relationships are VT=EIrV_T = \mathcal{E} - Ir and I=VT/ReqI = V_T / R_{eq}, where ReqR_{eq} is the equivalent external resistance. Since R1R_1 and R2R_2 are in parallel, their equivalent resistance is Req=R1R2R1+R2=4×64+6=2.4 ΩR_{eq} = \frac{R_1 R_2}{R_1 + R_2} = \frac{4 \times 6}{4 + 6} = 2.4\ \Omega. Because the terminal voltage appears across both parallel branches equally, the total current drawn from the battery is I=VTReq=5.02.42.08 AI = \frac{V_T}{R_{eq}} = \frac{5.0}{2.4} \approx 2.08\ \text{A}. The voltage drop across the internal resistance is EVT=1.0 V\mathcal{E} - V_T = 1.0\ \text{V}, so r=1.02.080.48 Ωr = \frac{1.0}{2.08} \approx 0.48\ \Omega. This is choice C, the correct answer. Choice A is wrong because it uses only one branch current to find rr, ignoring the current through R2R_2 entirely — this underestimates the total current and produces a meaningless "correction factor" that isn't physically justified. Choice B treats the parallel resistors as if they were in series, giving Req=10 ΩR_{eq} = 10\ \Omega. This is a fundamental circuit-topology error — parallel resistors always produce an equivalent resistance smaller than either individual resistor. Choice D claims the terminal voltage applies only to R1R_1, not R2R_2. This contradicts the definition of parallel circuits: all branches share the same voltage, which is exactly the terminal voltage. Your strategy: always identify the circuit topology first. In parallel circuits, voltage is shared — use ReqR_{eq} for the whole parallel network to find total current before solving for rr.

Question 4

A circuit contains two batteries and one external resistor. Battery 1 has emf E1=12 V\mathcal{E}_1 = 12 \text{ V} and internal resistance r1=1  Ωr_1 = 1 \text{ }\ \Omega. Battery 2 has emf E2=8 V\mathcal{E}_2 = 8 \text{ V} and internal resistance r2=2  Ωr_2 = 2 \text{ }\ \Omega. The two batteries are connected in series but with opposing polarities (positive terminal of battery 1 connected to the positive terminal of battery 2), and this combination drives current through R=5  ΩR = 5 \text{ }\ \Omega.

What is the current through RR, and which battery is being charged?

  1. I=2.5 AI = 2.5 \text{ A} and battery 2 is being charged, because the opposing polarity means the net emf is E1E2=4 V\mathcal{E}_1 - \mathcal{E}_2 = 4 \text{ V}, and current flows in the direction driven by the stronger battery (battery 1), which forces current backward through battery 2, charging it.
  2. I=0.50 AI = 0.50 \text{ A} and battery 1 is being charged, because the net emf in the loop is E1E2=4 V\mathcal{E}_1 - \mathcal{E}_2 = 4 \text{ V}, total resistance is r1+r2+R=8  Ωr_1 + r_2 + R = 8 \text{ }\ \Omega, and the current flows in the direction set by battery 2 (the larger emf determines direction), which pushes current backward through battery 1, charging it.
  3. I=2.5 AI = 2.5 \text{ A} and battery 1 is being charged, because the total emf is E1+E2=20 V\mathcal{E}_1 + \mathcal{E}_2 = 20 \text{ V} (opposing polarities add when batteries face each other), total resistance is r1+r2+R=8  Ωr_1 + r_2 + R = 8 \text{ }\ \Omega, but only R=5  ΩR = 5 \text{ }\ \Omega limits the current, giving I=20/8=2.5 AI = 20/8 = 2.5 \text{ A}.
  4. I=0.50 AI = 0.50 \text{ A} and battery 2 is being charged, because the net emf is E1E2=4 V\mathcal{E}_1 - \mathcal{E}_2 = 4 \text{ V} and the total resistance is r1+r2+R=8  Ωr_1 + r_2 + R = 8 \text{ }\ \Omega, giving I=4/8=0.50 AI = 4/8 = 0.50 \text{ A}, with current forced through battery 2 against its emf. (correct answer)
Explanation: When two batteries oppose each other in series, you must apply Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) carefully. The key insight is that opposing polarities mean the emfs subtract, not add — the stronger battery "wins" and determines the direction of current flow. Going around the loop, the net emf is E1E2=128=4 V\mathcal{E}_1 - \mathcal{E}_2 = 12 - 8 = 4 \text{ V}. All resistances are in series, so the total resistance is r1+r2+R=1+2+5=8 Ωr_1 + r_2 + R = 1 + 2 + 5 = 8 \text{ }\Omega. Applying Ohm's law gives I=4/8=0.50 AI = 4/8 = 0.50 \text{ A}. Since battery 1 is stronger, it drives current in its own preferred direction — but that means current enters battery 2 at its positive terminal and exits at its negative terminal, which is the signature of charging: current is forced against battery 2's natural discharge direction. That makes D correct. Choice A gets the current formula right (4 V/8 Ω4\text{ V}/8\text{ }\Omega) but then mysteriously reports 2.5 A2.5 \text{ A} — a arithmetic error — and incorrectly identifies which battery is charged; the logic about current direction is actually sound but paired with wrong numbers. Choice B correctly calculates I=0.50 AI = 0.50 \text{ A} but flips the charging identification: battery 1 is the stronger one driving the current, so it is not being charged — battery 2 is. Choice C makes a fundamental conceptual error by adding the emfs as if opposing batteries reinforce each other; they don't — opposing polarities subtract. A reliable strategy: always assign a current direction, write the KVL equation with a sign convention, and remember that a battery being charged has current entering its positive terminal.

Question 5

A real battery with emf E\mathcal{E} and internal resistance rr is connected to a variable external resistor RR. A student wishes to maximize the power delivered to RR.

Under the maximum-power-transfer condition, which of the following statements about the efficiency of power delivery from the battery to RR is correct?

  1. Efficiency is exactly 75%, because at R=rR = r the power delivered to RR is E2/(4r)\mathcal{E}^2/(4r) and the total power from the emf is E2/(2r)\mathcal{E}^2/(2r), so the fraction delivered to RR is 1/2=50%1/2 = 50\%, and the remaining 25% accounts for impedance matching overhead that reduces apparent losses.
  2. Efficiency is exactly 50%, because at maximum power transfer (R=rR = r), the current is E/(2r)\mathcal{E}/(2r), the power in RR is E2/(4r)\mathcal{E}^2/(4r), and the total power supplied by the emf is EI=E2/(2r)\mathcal{E}I = \mathcal{E}^2/(2r), so exactly half the source power is lost in the internal resistance. (correct answer)
  3. Efficiency is exactly 50%, but only when the battery is fully charged; as the battery ages and rr increases while E\mathcal{E} decreases, the optimal RR shifts upward while efficiency rises above 50%, meaning older batteries are paradoxically more efficient at maximum power transfer.
  4. Efficiency approaches 100% at maximum power transfer because the condition R=rR = r minimizes the voltage drop across the internal resistance, and as RR is tuned to match rr, nearly all the emf appears across the external load with negligible internal dissipation.
Explanation: When a real battery powers an external resistor, you're always dealing with a voltage divider between the internal resistance rr and the load RR. The key insight is that maximizing power to RR and maximizing efficiency are two different — and competing — goals. The maximum power transfer theorem tells you that power delivered to RR is greatest when R=rR = r. At that condition, the current is I=E/(R+r)=E/(2r)I = \mathcal{E}/(R + r) = \mathcal{E}/(2r). The power delivered to the external resistor is PR=I2R=(E2/4r2)r=E2/(4r)P_R = I^2 R = (\mathcal{E}^2/4r^2)\cdot r = \mathcal{E}^2/(4r). The total power supplied by the emf is Ptotal=EI=E2/(2r)P_{total} = \mathcal{E}I = \mathcal{E}^2/(2r). Efficiency is therefore η=PR/Ptotal=12=50%\eta = P_R/P_{total} = \tfrac{1}{2} = 50\%. Answer B captures this exactly — half the source power is dissipated inside the battery as heat in rr, and half reaches the load. Answer A is internally contradictory: it correctly computes 50% but then invents a fictional "25% impedance matching overhead," which has no physical basis. There are only two resistors sharing power here. Answer C contains a correct efficiency figure but builds a false conclusion around it. As rr increases with battery age, RoptimalR_{optimal} does shift to match the new rr, but the efficiency at maximum power transfer is always 50%, regardless of the specific values of E\mathcal{E} or rr. Answer D is backwards. Setting R=rR = r actually maximizes — not minimizes — the internal voltage drop, since a large fraction of E\mathcal{E} appears across rr. Study tip: Remember the trade-off: to push efficiency above 50%, you need RrR \gg r, but then power delivered to RR drops. Maximum power and maximum efficiency are mutually exclusive — a classic trap on circuit problems.

Question 6

A student connects a voltmeter (very high resistance) directly across the terminals of a battery and reads V1=9.0 VV_1 = 9.0 \text{ V}. She then connects a 10 Ω10 \text{ } \Omega resistor across the battery terminals and reads V2=8.0 VV_2 = 8.0 \text{ V} on the same voltmeter.

From these two measurements alone, what is the internal resistance rr of the battery, and what current does the 10 Ω10 \text{ } \Omega resistor draw?

  1. r=1.25 Ωr = 1.25 \text{ } \Omega and I=0.80 AI = 0.80 \text{ A}, found by recognizing that the open-circuit voltmeter reading gives E=9.0 V\mathcal{E} = 9.0 \text{ V}, the current under load is I=V2/R=8.0/10=0.80 AI = V_2/R = 8.0/10 = 0.80 \text{ A}, and the voltage drop across the internal resistance is EV2=1.0 V\mathcal{E} - V_2 = 1.0 \text{ V}, so r=1.0/0.80=1.25 Ωr = 1.0/0.80 = 1.25 \text{ } \Omega. (correct answer)
  2. r=1.11 Ωr = 1.11 \text{ } \Omega and I=0.90 AI = 0.90 \text{ A}, found by treating V1=9.0 VV_1 = 9.0 \text{ V} as the terminal voltage under load rather than the open-circuit emf, computing current as I=V1/R=9.0/10=0.90 AI = V_1/R = 9.0/10 = 0.90 \text{ A}, and then using r=(V1V2)/I=1.0/0.901.11 Ωr = (V_1 - V_2)/I = 1.0/0.90 \approx 1.11 \text{ } \Omega.
  3. r=0.125 Ωr = 0.125 \text{ } \Omega and I=0.80 AI = 0.80 \text{ A}, found by computing the current correctly as I=V2/R=0.80 AI = V_2/R = 0.80 \text{ A} but using the loaded terminal voltage V2=8.0 VV_2 = 8.0 \text{ V} as the emf, so r=(V2V2)/I=0r = (V_2 - V_2)/I = 0, then approximating from the ratio ΔV/V1=1/90.111\Delta V/V_1 = 1/9 \approx 0.111 times RR to get r0.125 Ωr \approx 0.125 \text{ } \Omega.
  4. r=1.25 Ωr = 1.25 \text{ } \Omega and I=0.80 AI = 0.80 \text{ A}, but the emf cannot be determined from these two measurements alone because V1V_1 was measured with a non-ideal voltmeter that draws a small current, so the true open-circuit voltage is slightly higher than 9.0 V and additional information about the voltmeter resistance is needed.
Explanation: Whenever you see a battery circuit problem, your first instinct should be to identify the EMF and terminal voltage separately. The EMF (E\mathcal{E}) is the battery's true voltage with no current flowing; the terminal voltage drops once current flows because of the internal resistance rr. Here's the key insight: a voltmeter has extremely high resistance, so connecting it alone draws essentially zero current. That first reading, V1=9.0 VV_1 = 9.0 \text{ V}, is your open-circuit measurement — meaning E=9.0 V\mathcal{E} = 9.0 \text{ V}. Once you attach the 10 Ω10\ \Omega resistor, real current flows and the terminal voltage drops to V2=8.0 VV_2 = 8.0 \text{ V}. The current through the external resistor is I=V2/R=8.0/10=0.80 AI = V_2/R = 8.0/10 = 0.80 \text{ A}. The voltage "lost" inside the battery is EV2=1.0 V\mathcal{E} - V_2 = 1.0 \text{ V}, so the internal resistance is r=1.0/0.80=1.25 Ωr = 1.0/0.80 = 1.25\ \Omega. That's exactly what answer A describes — it's correct. Answer B makes a conceptual error by treating V1V_1 as a loaded terminal voltage rather than the EMF, computing current as 9.0/10=0.90 A9.0/10 = 0.90 \text{ A}. This misidentifies what the open-circuit reading actually represents. Answer C attempts a nonsensical hybrid calculation — correctly finding I=0.80 AI = 0.80 \text{ A} but then confusing V2V_2 with the EMF, which forces ΔV=0\Delta V = 0, and the final value of rr is fabricated. Answer D raises a technically real concern about voltmeter loading, but the problem explicitly states the voltmeter has very high resistance — a standard idealization that makes this objection irrelevant here. Your study tip: always ask yourself "Is this an open-circuit or loaded measurement?" before writing any equation. That single distinction separates E\mathcal{E} from terminal voltage and unlocks every internal resistance problem.

Question 7

A battery is being charged by an external source and then discharged through a separate external circuit. The battery has emf E\mathcal{E} and internal resistance rr. A student measures: terminal voltage VT=11.4 VV_T = 11.4 \text{ V} during discharge at I=3 AI = 3 \text{ A}, and terminal voltage VT=12.9 VV_T = 12.9 \text{ V} during charging at I=3 AI = 3 \text{ A}.

Using both measurements, what are the emf E\mathcal{E} and internal resistance rr of the battery?

  1. E=12.15 V\mathcal{E} = 12.15 \text{ V} and r=0.25 Ωr = 0.25 \text{ } \Omega, but this result is only valid if the battery's emf remains constant between discharge and charge. In practice, E\mathcal{E} shifts with state of charge, so the true internal resistance requires a correction factor and cannot be determined from just two measurements at a single current.
  2. E=12.15 V\mathcal{E} = 12.15 \text{ V} and r=0.50 Ωr = 0.50 \text{ } \Omega, obtained by applying VT=EIrV_T = \mathcal{E} - Ir to both measurements (treating both as discharge): 11.4=E3r11.4 = \mathcal{E} - 3r and 12.9=E3r12.9 = \mathcal{E} - 3r. Since these two equations are inconsistent, the student averages the right-hand sides to get E=12.15 V\mathcal{E} = 12.15 \text{ V} and estimates r=(12.911.4)/(2×3)=0.25 Ωr = (12.9 - 11.4)/(2 \times 3) = 0.25 \text{ } \Omega, then doubles rr to 0.50 Ω0.50 \text{ } \Omega to account for the sign reversal during charging.
  3. E=12.15 V\mathcal{E} = 12.15 \text{ V} and r=0.25 Ωr = 0.25 \text{ } \Omega, obtained by writing EIr=11.4\mathcal{E} - Ir = 11.4 for discharge and E+Ir=12.9\mathcal{E} + Ir = 12.9 for charging, then adding to get 2E=24.3 V2\mathcal{E} = 24.3 \text{ V} (so E=12.15 V\mathcal{E} = 12.15 \text{ V}) and subtracting to get 2Ir=1.5 V2Ir = 1.5 \text{ V} (so r=1.5/6=0.25 Ωr = 1.5/6 = 0.25 \text{ } \Omega). (correct answer)
  4. E=11.4 V\mathcal{E} = 11.4 \text{ V} and r=0.50 Ωr = 0.50 \text{ } \Omega, obtained by identifying the discharge terminal voltage as the emf (since the battery acts as a source during discharge), then using the difference between the two readings: r=(12.911.4)/(2×3)=0.25 Ωr = (12.9 - 11.4)/(2 \times 3) = 0.25 \text{ } \Omega, doubled to 0.50 Ω0.50 \text{ } \Omega because current flows in opposite directions in the two scenarios.
Explanation: When a battery is discharging, it drives current outward, so its terminal voltage is reduced by the internal resistance drop: VT=EIrV_T = \mathcal{E} - Ir. When a battery is charging, an external source forces current inward (opposing the battery's own current direction), so the terminal voltage is raised above the emf: VT=E+IrV_T = \mathcal{E} + Ir. Keeping these signs straight is the entire key to this problem. Setting up the two equations correctly gives you E3r=11.4\mathcal{E} - 3r = 11.4 (discharge) and E+3r=12.9\mathcal{E} + 3r = 12.9 (charging). Adding them eliminates rr: 2E=24.32\mathcal{E} = 24.3, so E=12.15 V\mathcal{E} = 12.15 \text{ V}. Subtracting the first from the second eliminates E\mathcal{E}: 6r=1.56r = 1.5, so r=0.25 Ωr = 0.25\ \Omega. This is exactly what C does — clean, systematic, and correct. A reaches the right numerical values but then undermines them with a fabricated caveat about needing a "correction factor." No such correction is required under the standard battery model; this caveat is a distractor designed to make you doubt a perfectly valid result. B misapplies the discharge formula to both scenarios, treating the charging measurement as if it also follows EIr\mathcal{E} - Ir. This produces two contradictory equations, and the "fix" of averaging and doubling is entirely made up — not a real physics technique. D incorrectly identifies the discharge terminal voltage as the emf itself, confusing VTV_T with E\mathcal{E}. The terminal voltage and emf are only equal when current is zero. Study tip: Whenever a battery problem involves both charging and discharging, immediately write two separate equations with opposite signs on the IrIr term, then solve the system — this two-equation approach always works cleanly.

Question 8

Two identical batteries, each with emf E=9 V\mathcal{E} = 9 \text{ V} and internal resistance r=1  Ωr = 1 \text{ }\ \Omega, are connected in series to an external resistance R=8  ΩR = 8 \text{ }\ \Omega. A student then reconfigures the same two batteries in parallel (positive terminals together) and connects the same R=8  ΩR = 8 \text{ }\ \Omega externally.

Comparing the two configurations, which statement correctly describes the current delivered to RR and the terminal voltage across RR in each case?

  1. Series: IR=1.8 AI_R = 1.8 \text{ A}, VR=14.4 VV_R = 14.4 \text{ V}; Parallel: IR=1.06 AI_R = 1.06 \text{ A}, VR=8.47 VV_R = 8.47 \text{ V}. The series configuration delivers more current and higher terminal voltage to RR because the emfs add while the internal resistances also add, yielding a net gain in driving voltage.
  2. Series: IR=1.8 AI_R = 1.8 \text{ A}, VR=14.4 VV_R = 14.4 \text{ V}; Parallel: IR=1.06 AI_R = 1.06 \text{ A}, VR=8.47 VV_R = 8.47 \text{ V}. The parallel configuration delivers less current to RR but is preferable when longevity matters, since each battery supplies only half the total current, reducing internal losses per cell. (correct answer)
  3. Series: IR=2.0 AI_R = 2.0 \text{ A}, VR=16.0 VV_R = 16.0 \text{ V}; Parallel: IR=1.06 AI_R = 1.06 \text{ A}, VR=8.47 VV_R = 8.47 \text{ V}. The series configuration doubles both the emf and the terminal voltage because internal resistance is negligible compared to RR, so the full 18 V18 \text{ V} appears across RR.
  4. Series: IR=1.8 AI_R = 1.8 \text{ A}, VR=14.4 VV_R = 14.4 \text{ V}; Parallel: IR=1.13 AI_R = 1.13 \text{ A}, VR=9.0 VV_R = 9.0 \text{ V}. The parallel configuration maintains the full 9 V9 \text{ V} emf across RR with no internal resistance losses, because the two internal resistances cancel when placed in parallel, making the combination an ideal voltage source.
Explanation: When analyzing battery configurations, always start by finding the equivalent EMF and equivalent internal resistance for each setup — then apply Ohm's law to the full circuit. Series configuration: Two batteries in series add their EMFs and internal resistances: Etotal=18 V\mathcal{E}_{total} = 18\text{ V}, rtotal=2 Ωr_{total} = 2\ \Omega. The current through the circuit is I=188+2=1.8 AI = \frac{18}{8+2} = 1.8\text{ A}. The terminal voltage across RR is VR=1.8×8=14.4 VV_R = 1.8 \times 8 = 14.4\text{ V}. Parallel configuration: Identical batteries in parallel keep the same EMF (E=9 V\mathcal{E} = 9\text{ V}) but halve the internal resistance: req=0.5 Ωr_{eq} = 0.5\ \Omega. The circuit current is I=98+0.51.06 AI = \frac{9}{8+0.5} \approx 1.06\text{ A}, giving VR=1.06×88.47 VV_R = 1.06 \times 8 \approx 8.47\text{ V}. Each battery only supplies half this current (0.53 A\approx 0.53\text{ A}), meaning lower internal dissipation per cell and longer battery life. This confirms B is correct. A has the right numbers but gives the wrong reasoning — it implies series is simply "better," ignoring the practical advantage of parallel for longevity. C incorrectly states I=2.0 AI = 2.0\text{ A} and VR=16.0 VV_R = 16.0\text{ V}, which would only be true if internal resistance were zero (it isn't — the 2 Ω2\ \Omega drop is real). D claims the parallel combination has zero internal resistance, which is false; req=r/2=0.5 Ωr_{eq} = r/2 = 0.5\ \Omega, not zero. Study tip: Memorize the two parallel-battery rules — same EMF, halved internal resistance — and always account for internal resistance in your voltage calculations; exams frequently trap students who forget that VREtotalV_R \neq \mathcal{E}_{total}.

Question 9

A battery with emf E\mathcal{E} and internal resistance rr is connected to an external circuit. As the battery discharges over time, its internal resistance rr increases while its emf E\mathcal{E} remains approximately constant. The external load resistance RR is fixed.

As the battery ages and rr increases with RR and E\mathcal{E} held constant, which of the following correctly describes the simultaneous changes in terminal voltage VTV_T, current II, and power dissipated internally PintP_{int}?

  1. VTV_T increases, II decreases, and PintP_{int} may increase or decrease depending on whether r<Rr < R or r>Rr > R. At r=Rr = R, PintP_{int} is maximized (by the maximum power transfer theorem applied to the internal resistance), and beyond this point PintP_{int} decreases even as rr continues to rise.
  2. VTV_T decreases, II decreases, and PintP_{int} increases monotonically as rr grows, because the larger internal resistance always dissipates more power regardless of the ratio r/Rr/R, since Pint=I2rP_{int} = I^2 r and rr is increasing even as II falls.
  3. VTV_T increases, II decreases, and PintP_{int} decreases monotonically as rr grows, because the terminal voltage recovering toward E\mathcal{E} means less voltage is dropped internally, so both the current and the internal dissipation fall together as the battery approaches open-circuit conditions.
  4. VTV_T decreases, II decreases, and PintP_{int} may increase or decrease depending on whether r<Rr < R or r>Rr > R. At r=Rr = R, PintP_{int} reaches a maximum value of E2/(4R)\mathcal{E}^2/(4R), and for r>Rr > R, PintP_{int} decreases back toward zero as rr \to \infty. (correct answer)
Explanation: When a battery with fixed emf E\mathcal{E} drives current through a fixed external resistance RR plus an aging internal resistance rr, every quantity you care about flows from one master equation: I=ER+rI = \frac{\mathcal{E}}{R + r}. Use this as your anchor. As rr increases, the denominator grows, so II decreases — straightforward. Terminal voltage follows from VT=EIr=ERR+rV_T = \mathcal{E} - Ir = \frac{\mathcal{E} R}{R+r}, which also decreases as rr grows (larger rr in the denominator, smaller numerator contribution). So VTV_T falls and II falls — both together. Now for internal power: Pint=I2r=E2r(R+r)2P_{int} = I^2 r = \frac{\mathcal{E}^2 r}{(R+r)^2}. This is not monotonic. Taking the derivative and setting it to zero reveals a maximum at r=Rr = R, giving Pint,max=E24RP_{int,max} = \frac{\mathcal{E}^2}{4R}. Below r=Rr = R, increasing rr raises PintP_{int}; above r=Rr = R, the shrinking current wins and PintP_{int} falls back toward zero. This is exactly what D describes — the correct answer. A is wrong because it correctly identifies the r=Rr = R maximum but incorrectly states VTV_T increases. The terminal voltage drops as rr grows, not recovers. B is wrong because it claims PintP_{int} increases monotonically — ignoring that beyond r=Rr = R, the current collapse dominates and PintP_{int} actually decreases. C is doubly wrong: VTV_T decreases (not increases toward E\mathcal{E}), and PintP_{int} is non-monotonic, not uniformly falling. When you see competing effects — one quantity rising, another falling — always write out the explicit formula and check for a maximum analytically rather than reasoning qualitatively alone.