All questions
Question 1
An OTR in an acute care setting is treating a 75-year-old client 2 days after a total knee arthroplasty. The intervention plan includes education on adaptive equipment for lower body dressing. During the session, the client's oxygen saturation drops from 96% to 88% while attempting to use a sock aid, and the client reports sudden, sharp chest pain. These symptoms resolve after 2 minutes of rest.
What is the OTR's MOST critical immediate response after ensuring the client is stable?
- Cease the activity, report the signs and symptoms of a potential pulmonary embolism immediately to the nursing and medical staff. (correct answer)
- Document the client's physiological response and defer the activity until the next scheduled therapy session.
- Modify the task by having the client perform the activity in a semi-reclined position to lower the physiological demand.
- Check the client's medical chart for any pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary conditions that would explain this response.
Explanation: When you encounter sudden onset of chest pain and oxygen desaturation in a post-surgical patient, you're dealing with a potential medical emergency that requires immediate clinical judgment about safety versus continuing therapy.
The combination of sharp chest pain and dropping oxygen saturation (96% to 88%) in a 75-year-old client two days post-knee surgery represents classic warning signs of pulmonary embolism (PE). Post-surgical patients, especially elderly ones with limited mobility, are at high risk for blood clots that can travel to the lungs. Even though symptoms resolved with rest, PE remains a life-threatening possibility that demands immediate medical evaluation.
Answer A is correct because patient safety always takes precedence over therapy goals. The OTR must immediately cease activity and alert medical staff to these concerning symptoms so they can evaluate for PE and initiate appropriate interventions if needed.
Answer B fails to recognize the urgency of potential PE symptoms - documentation alone is insufficient when a medical emergency may be occurring. Answer C is dangerous because it continues therapy despite red flag symptoms that could indicate a life-threatening condition. Any modification assumes the symptoms are benign exercise intolerance rather than a serious complication. Answer D delays critical communication while the OTR investigates, wasting precious time when immediate medical assessment is needed.
Remember: On the NBCOT, when you see acute onset chest pain with oxygen desaturation in post-surgical patients, think pulmonary embolism first. Patient safety always trumps therapy continuation - when in doubt, stop and communicate immediately with medical staff.
Question 2
A veteran with PTSD and a history of mild TBI is in a work-readiness program. The OTR uses work simulation tasks to address attention and task completion. Data shows the client completes the tasks with 98% accuracy. However, the client's self-rated Subjective Units of Distress Scale (SUDS) score consistently increases from 2/10 to 8/10 post-session, and they report experiencing flashbacks later in the day. The client has missed 3 of the last 6 sessions due to reported anxiety.
Given the conflicting data of high task performance and severe psychological distress, what is the OTR's BEST course of action?
- Continue with the current work simulation tasks but increase the complexity to improve the client's distress tolerance.
- Focus on the positive performance data and document that the client is meeting accuracy goals, attributing absences to a separate issue.
- Modify the intervention to integrate trauma-informed care, such as grounding techniques and pacing strategies, and track both accuracy and SUDS scores. (correct answer)
- Recommend discharge from the program, as the client's psychological response is a barrier to consistent participation and progress.
Explanation: The correct answer is C. Effective intervention monitoring requires looking beyond performance metrics to the client's holistic response. The high accuracy is misleading; the primary barrier is the psychological distress the task provokes. The best action is to modify the intervention using a trauma-informed approach. Integrating coping mechanisms like grounding techniques directly into the intervention addresses the root cause of the distress and poor attendance, demonstrating advanced clinical reasoning.
Question 3
A client with persistent mental illness is working on IADL goals in a community-based program. The goal is to create and follow a weekly budget. After 4 weeks of intervention using a digital budgeting app, the client can demonstrate how to use the app and correctly categorize expenses during OT sessions. However, the client reports they are still frequently running out of money and have had to borrow from family.
What is the MOST likely reason for this discrepancy, and how should the OTR modify the intervention?
- The client has deficits in executive function, specifically impulse control; the OTR should implement a concrete, external system like a cash envelope system. (correct answer)
- The budgeting app is too complex; the OTR should switch to a simpler paper-and-pencil worksheet.
- The client lacks motivation; the OTR should explore this with the client before changing the intervention.
- The client's family is enabling them; the OTR should hold a family meeting to discuss boundaries.
Explanation: When evaluating IADL interventions, you need to distinguish between demonstration of skills versus functional performance in real-world contexts. This client shows a classic pattern: they can perform the task in a controlled therapy setting but struggle with actual implementation, suggesting an underlying executive function deficit rather than a learning or knowledge problem.
Answer A is correct because the client's ability to use the app correctly during sessions, combined with continued overspending, points to impulse control deficits. They understand budgeting conceptually but can't regulate their spending behavior in real-time. A cash envelope system provides external structure that compensates for internal executive dysfunction by making spending limits physically concrete and immediately visible.
Answer B is wrong because the client already demonstrates competency with the app during sessions - complexity isn't the issue since they can use it successfully in therapy.
Answer C is wrong because lack of motivation would typically manifest as poor engagement or performance during therapy sessions, not selective success in therapy with failure in real-world application.
Answer D is wrong because while family dynamics might be contributing, the primary issue is the client's inability to translate learned skills into functional behavior - addressing family enabling wouldn't solve the core executive function deficit.
Key strategy: On NBCOT questions about persistent mental illness and IADL performance, always consider whether the client can demonstrate the skill versus actually perform it functionally. When someone "knows" but "can't do," think executive function deficits and external compensatory strategies.
Question 4
A premature infant in the NICU, born at 28 weeks gestation, is now 34 weeks post-conceptional age. During initial oral feeding trials with the OTR, the infant takes 5-10 mL of milk before exhibiting signs of disorganization, including repeated oxygen desaturations to 86%, perioral cyanosis, and bradycardia. This pattern has been consistent over three sessions.
What is the OTR's BEST action based on this consistent physiological response?
- Continue with the current trial protocol, as these stress signs are common in premature infants and tolerance will build over time.
- Recommend a swallow study to rule out aspiration before continuing any further oral feeding trials.
- Switch to a faster flow nipple to allow the infant to finish the feeding more quickly, reducing the duration of the stressful event.
- Modify the intervention to focus on non-nutritive sucking for oral motor organization and limit nutritive trials to very small, paced volumes. (correct answer)
Explanation: When working with premature infants in the NICU, you must prioritize physiological stability over feeding advancement. The consistent pattern of oxygen desaturations, perioral cyanosis, and bradycardia indicates this infant is experiencing significant physiological stress during oral feeding that compromises their cardiorespiratory system.
Option D is correct because it addresses the core issue: the infant needs oral motor organization before progressing to nutritive feeding. Non-nutritive sucking helps develop coordination between sucking, swallowing, and breathing without the added stress of managing milk flow. When nutritive trials do occur, they should be very small volumes with external pacing to prevent overwhelming the infant's immature systems.
Option A is dangerous because it ignores clear signs of physiological instability. While stress signs are common in preemies, consistent oxygen desaturations and bradycardia during feeding are serious red flags that require intervention, not persistence.
Option B addresses aspiration concerns, but the described signs (desaturations, cyanosis, bradycardia) are more indicative of cardiorespiratory disorganization from feeding demands rather than aspiration. A swallow study might be considered later, but immediate intervention should focus on reducing feeding stress.
Option C would worsen the problem by increasing milk flow rate, making it even harder for the infant to coordinate their immature suck-swallow-breathe pattern and likely causing more severe physiological instability.
Remember: with NICU feeding interventions, always step back and build foundational skills when you see consistent physiological stress signs. Premature infants' safety depends on respecting their developmental readiness.
Question 5
A 7-year-old child with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and sensory processing challenges is receiving school-based OT. A key IEP goal is to participate in a 15-minute cooperative group activity with peers, measured using Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). After six weeks of intervention focusing on social stories and structured turn-taking, the child achieves a GAS score of +1 (participates for 10 minutes with 1-2 verbal cues). However, the teacher reports that following these group activities, the child engages in a high frequency of self-stimulatory behaviors (hand-flapping, rocking) for the next hour.
What is the OTR's MOST appropriate action in response to this monitoring data?
- Modify the intervention plan to integrate a sensory diet, including proprioceptive input, immediately before and after the group activity. (correct answer)
- Increase the difficulty of the GAS goal to +2 (participation for 15 minutes) to encourage further progress on the social goal.
- Recommend the child be moved to a 1:1 instructional setting for social skills to prevent overstimulation and behavioral escalation.
- Inform the IEP team that the goal has been successfully met at the +1 level and suggest no changes to the OT services.
Explanation: The correct answer is A. This response requires the OTR to synthesize two conflicting pieces of data: success on the social participation goal (GAS score) and a negative sensory/behavioral response. The most appropriate action is to address the underlying sensory needs that are likely being taxed by the social activity. Modifying the plan to include preventative sensory strategies addresses the whole child and supports sustained participation, rather than ignoring the negative consequence.
Question 6
A client is 8 weeks post-flexor tendon repair in zone 2 of the little finger and is following a specific therapy protocol. Monitoring reveals active range of motion (AROM) at the PIP joint is 0-60 degrees, while passive range of motion (PROM) is 0-90 degrees. This 30-degree AROM lag indicates a significant adhesion.
Based on this specific clinical finding, what is the MOST appropriate modification to the intervention plan?
- Fabricate a dynamic flexion splint to be worn 4-6 hours per day to increase passive range of motion.
- Focus on composite active fist making against light resistance to improve overall grip strength.
- Implement isolated active PIP flexion exercises with the MCP joint blocked in extension to facilitate differential tendon gliding. (correct answer)
- Discontinue active motion and return to passive motion only, as the adhesion indicates the repair is not tolerating activity.
Explanation: The correct answer is C. An AROM lag with greater PROM is the classic sign of tendon adhesion. The intervention must be modified to specifically target this problem. Blocking exercises isolate the glide of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and profundus (FDP) tendons relative to each other and surrounding tissues, which is the most direct and appropriate treatment for adhesions. The other options are incorrect: (A) addresses passive motion, which is not the primary problem; (B) is too aggressive and non-specific; (D) would worsen the adhesion.
Question 7
A client with a C6 spinal cord injury has been trained to use a tenodesis grasp and can successfully pick up 1-inch blocks. During an observation in the cafeteria, the OTR notes the client uses their teeth to pick up a plastic fork. When asked, the client states, "Using my wrist to grab things is too much work and I'm afraid I'll drop it."
Based on this observation and client feedback, how should the OTR modify the intervention?
- Insist the client practice with the tenodesis grasp during all meals to promote skill generalization.
- Provide a universal cuff with a built-up handle for eating and re-focus tenodesis training on a different, client-preferred task. (correct answer)
- Discontinue tenodesis training altogether, as the client is demonstrating non-adherence for functional tasks.
- Implement a strengthening program for the wrist extensors to make the tenodesis grasp more powerful and effective.
Explanation: The correct answer is B. This scenario highlights a classic gap between clinical skill and functional use. The client's feedback reveals that the tenodesis grasp, in its current state, does not meet the demands of the mealtime activity. A client-centered approach involves providing an appropriate adaptation (universal cuff) for the immediate need (eating) while continuing to develop the tenodesis skill for other tasks that the client may find more suitable. This respects the client's experience while still working on the broader functional goal.
Question 8
An outpatient client with cubital tunnel syndrome has been treated for 4 weeks with an elbow orthosis for nighttime wear, activity modification, and nerve gliding exercises. At re-assessment, Tinel's sign at the elbow is still positive and 2-point discrimination on the small finger is unchanged. However, the client reports they are no longer waking up at night due to numbness.
Based on these mixed results, what is the MOST prudent course of action?
- Refer the client immediately back to the surgeon for consideration of surgical decompression due to the lack of objective sensory improvement.
- Discharge the client from therapy, as their primary symptom of night paresthesia has been resolved.
- Discontinue the nerve gliding exercises as they have not resulted in objective change and may be irritating the nerve.
- Continue the current conservative intervention for another 2-4 weeks, documenting the subjective improvement as a key positive indicator. (correct answer)
Explanation: The correct answer is D. In nerve compression syndromes, subjective symptomatic relief (especially reduction of night symptoms) is often the first sign of improvement and is a positive prognostic indicator. Objective measures like 2-point discrimination can take much longer to show change. It is premature to refer for surgery (A) when the client is subjectively improving with conservative care. Discharging (B) is also premature as objective signs persist. Continuing the proven conservative plan is the most appropriate action.
Question 9
A 58-year-old client with chronic rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is being seen for joint protection and energy conservation. At the 4-week re-evaluation, the client reports consistent use of the taught techniques. However, their Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score has increased by 11 points, indicating a decline in function. The client also reports a new flare-up, with morning stiffness lasting 90 minutes compared to 30 minutes at the initial evaluation.
Which action should the OTR take FIRST in response to these findings?
- Discontinue the current intervention as it is ineffective and focus solely on providing adaptive equipment to compensate for the functional decline.
- Collaborate with the client to complete an activity diary to identify potential triggers and consult with their rheumatologist regarding a possible medication review. (correct answer)
- Increase the intensity of therapeutic exercises to strengthen the muscles around the affected joints and improve their DASH score.
- Re-educate the client on the same joint protection principles, assuming they have not been adhering to the program correctly despite their report.
Explanation: The correct answer is B. The worsening DASH score and report of a flare-up despite adherence to the program suggest that the client's underlying disease process may be active. The OTR's role includes analyzing the context (activity diary) and collaborating with the interprofessional team. Consulting the rheumatologist is crucial, as a medical change (e.g., medication adjustment) may be required before OT interventions can be fully effective. This action addresses the problem holistically and recognizes the boundaries of OT practice.
Question 10
A client with Parkinson's disease has been participating in OT for 6 weeks, focusing on energy conservation for meal preparation. Pre- and post-intervention scores on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) for the goal of "preparing a simple hot meal" are as follows: Performance score changed from 2/10 to 6/10. Satisfaction score changed from 3/10 to 3/10. The client states, "I can do it now with all the equipment, but I'm so slow and tired afterwards that it's not worth it."
How should the OTR interpret these results and modify the plan?
- Discontinue the goal, as the significant improvement in performance indicates success, and the satisfaction score is subjective.
- Continue the current plan, as the client needs more time to adapt to the new methods and improve their satisfaction.
- Acknowledge the performance gain but modify the intervention to specifically address the components of speed and perceived exertion. (correct answer)
- Shift the focus to a different occupation, as the client's feedback indicates meal preparation is no longer a meaningful goal.
Explanation: The correct answer is C. Effective monitoring requires valuing both the performance and satisfaction scores of the COPM, as well as the client's qualitative feedback. The data shows that while the client can perform the task, the occupational experience is still poor (no change in satisfaction, negative comments). The OTR must analyze why satisfaction is low (speed, fatigue) and modify the intervention to target those specific components, perhaps by further breaking down the task or introducing different pacing strategies.
Question 11
A child with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) has been receiving OT for 8 weeks with a focus on improving ball skills using a motor learning approach. Progress monitoring shows the child's score on the Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD-2) for ball skills has improved by only one standard score point, which is within the standard error of measurement. The child continues to avoid playground games involving balls.
What is the OTR's MOST clinically sound next step?
- Continue the current motor learning approach for another 8 weeks, as progress with DCD is often slow.
- Shift the intervention to a Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) approach, focusing on client-chosen goals and strategy development. (correct answer)
- Increase the frequency of OT from one to three times per week to provide more intensive practice with the same intervention.
- Recommend the child participate in non-ball-related activities for physical education to ensure a positive experience.
Explanation: The correct answer is B. The monitoring data (minimal objective change on TGMD-2, no change in participation) indicates that the current intervention approach is not effective. Simply continuing or intensifying an ineffective approach is poor practice. The CO-OP approach is a top-down, evidence-based intervention for DCD that may be more effective than a purely motor-based approach when motor learning has stalled. This demonstrates the ability to change the entire frame of reference based on monitoring data.
Question 12
A client is 3 days post-op from a complex hand surgery and has been provided with a custom thermoplastic dorsal blocking orthosis. The OTR instructed the client and nursing staff on a strict wearing schedule. At a follow-up, the OTR observes deep red marks on the dorsum of the hand and the client has new complaints of numbness in the thumb. The client reports wearing the orthosis continuously, stating, "I didn't want to take any chances."
What is the OTR's IMMEDIATE priority?
- Document the client's non-compliance with the prescribed wearing schedule.
- Re-mold the orthosis to relieve pressure and re-educate the client on the specific schedule, including skin checks. (correct answer)
- Contact the surgeon to report potential nerve compression before making any changes to the orthosis.
- Provide additional padding inside the orthosis to cushion the red areas and relieve the discomfort.
Explanation: The correct answer is B. The clinical signs (deep red marks, new numbness) indicate the orthosis is ill-fitting and potentially causing nerve compression. The immediate priority is to correct the source of the problem. This involves adjusting the orthosis and ensuring the client understands the correct protocol. While contacting the surgeon (C) might be necessary if symptoms don't resolve, the OTR's primary responsibility is to manage the orthotic intervention. Adding padding (D) without adjusting the fit is incorrect as it would likely increase pressure. Documenting non-compliance (A) is secondary to ensuring client safety.
Question 13
A client in a work conditioning program for chronic low back pain has increased their floor-to-waist lifting capacity from 15 lbs to 30 lbs over 3 weeks. However, their score on the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) has also increased, and they report being "more guarded" and "anxious about re-injury" during daily activities at home.
How should the OTR interpret these conflicting outcomes and adjust the plan?
- Focus on the objective lifting gains and continue to increase the weight, as this is the primary goal of the program.
- Pause the progressive lifting and pivot to pain science education, addressing the client's unhelpful beliefs about pain and activity.
- Integrate graded exposure to feared movements and pain science education alongside the continued, gradual progression of lifting. (correct answer)
- Decrease the lifting weight back to a level where the client reports no anxiety, and maintain that level indefinitely.
Explanation: The correct answer is C. This is a complex case where physical capacity is improving but the psychosocial aspect (fear-avoidance) is worsening. Ignoring the FABQ score (A) is unsafe and not client-centered. Stopping the physical progression entirely (B) is not ideal, as the client is making gains. The most sophisticated approach is to integrate psychosocial interventions (pain science education, graded exposure) with the physical conditioning. This addresses the client's beliefs and emotions about movement while still progressing toward their work-related goals.
Question 14
A high school student with an emotional disturbance has an IEP goal to use coping strategies to reduce elopement from the classroom. The intervention involves teaching deep breathing and allowing the student to request a break in a resource room. Data collected by the teacher shows that requests for breaks have increased to an average of 6 times per class period, and elopement incidents have not decreased. The requests primarily occur during non-preferred academic tasks.
How should the OTR interpret this data and modify the intervention?
- Conclude that the coping strategies are ineffective and recommend a more restrictive behavior plan be developed by the school psychologist.
- Analyze the function of the break-requesting behavior as task avoidance and modify the plan to teach strategies for managing academic frustration. (correct answer)
- Continue with the current plan but instruct the teacher to deny some of the break requests to reduce the frequency of the behavior.
- Increase the student's time in the resource room, as the high number of requests indicates a significant need for a calming space.
Explanation: The correct answer is B. Effective intervention monitoring requires looking at the function of a behavior, not just its form. The data strongly suggests the student is using the break request strategy to avoid work, rather than to manage emotional dysregulation. Therefore, the intervention is not targeting the correct antecedent. The OTR should modify the plan to build skills for tolerating frustration and engaging in non-preferred tasks, which is a more direct solution than simply managing the outcome behavior (elopement).
Question 15
A client is 3 months into their rehabilitation following a transhumeral amputation and has been fitted with a myoelectric prosthesis. During clinical sessions, the client can consistently open and close the terminal device and demonstrates a functional grasp and release of various objects. However, the client's self-report on the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) reveals very low scores on the Psychosocial Adjustment scale, and the client admits to only wearing the device during therapy.
What is the OTR's BEST response to this discrepancy between clinical performance and functional use?
- Focus clinic sessions on more complex motor skills with the prosthesis to increase the client's confidence in their ability to control it.
- Shift the focus of intervention to address body image, self-efficacy, and the integration of the prosthesis into valued life roles and routines. (correct answer)
- Refer the client back to the prosthetist, as the low wear-time suggests there may be an issue with the fit or weight of the device.
- Educate the client on the risk of learned non-use and provide a strict wearing schedule to follow at home to promote habit formation.
Explanation: The correct answer is B. The TAPES scores and client report are critical pieces of monitoring data that indicate the primary barriers to use are psychosocial, not motor control. The client can physically operate the device but has not integrated it into their self-identity or daily life. Therefore, continuing to focus only on motor skills (A) will be ineffective. The OTR must shift the intervention to address the client's psychosocial experience of amputation and prosthesis use.
Question 16
A 65-year-old client is 12 weeks post-CVA with moderate right hemiparesis and is attending outpatient OT. For the past four weeks, the client's FIM scores for UE dressing and grooming have plateaued at a level 4 (Minimal Assistance). The client reports feeling stronger and is highly motivated, but expresses significant frustration with their continued need for help with buttoning and managing toothpaste. The current intervention focuses on repetitive, task-specific practice of dressing and grooming.
Based on this information, which of the following actions BEST demonstrates effective intervention monitoring and planning?
- Continue the current plan for four more weeks, as neurological recovery can be slow and motivation is high.
- Discharge the client with a home program for dressing and grooming, as they have reached a functional plateau.
- Administer the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) to re-evaluate priorities and identify specific barriers to performance. (correct answer)
- Shift the intervention focus entirely to neuromuscular re-education using e-stim to increase motor return.
Explanation: The correct answer is C. A plateau in a standardized measure (FIM) coupled with client-reported frustration indicates a need to re-evaluate the intervention plan. The current approach is not yielding further gains. Using a client-centered tool like the COPM is the best next step to collaboratively identify the specific performance barriers (e.g., fine motor control, sequencing, frustration tolerance) and re-prioritize goals, which will then guide the modification of the intervention plan. This demonstrates a systematic process of monitoring, re-evaluating, and then planning the next steps.
Question 17
An 82-year-old client in a skilled nursing facility is recovering from a hip fracture. After 3 weeks of OT, the client has met the goal of ambulating 100 feet with a rolling walker and is now at a FIM level 5 (Supervision) for mobility. However, the client reports a significant fear of falling and refuses to ambulate outside the therapy gym. The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) score is 52/64, indicating a very high concern about falling.
Which modification to the intervention plan is MOST appropriate?
- Discharge the client from OT for mobility goals since the ambulation distance goal has been achieved and documented.
- Increase the ambulation distance goal to 200 feet within the therapy gym to build physical endurance and confidence.
- Grade the environment by practicing ambulation in the client's room and hallway, while integrating cognitive-behavioral strategies to address fear of falling. (correct answer)
- Recommend a wheelchair for all out-of-gym mobility to ensure safety and prevent falls until the client reports feeling more confident.
Explanation: The correct answer is C. The monitoring data (observation, FES-I score) clearly indicates that the primary barrier is psychosocial (fear of falling), not physical capacity. Simply meeting a distance goal in a controlled environment is insufficient. The best plan modification involves grading the task into a more realistic context (room, hallway) and directly addressing the fear of falling using evidence-based approaches. This demonstrates a holistic approach that links psychological factors to functional performance.
Question 18
An older adult client with low vision secondary to age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) has been taught eccentric viewing techniques. The client can now successfully use their preferred retinal locus to view static, high-contrast letters on a screen. However, during a functional trial of reading a newspaper, the client loses their place and complains that the words "jump around."
Based on this functional observation, what is the MOST appropriate modification to the intervention?
- Return to practicing with static, single letters until 100% accuracy is achieved, as the foundational skill is not yet mastered.
- Introduce steady-eye strategy training and the use of a typoscope to help with tracking across a line of continuous text. (correct answer)
- Conclude that eccentric viewing is not a viable strategy for this client and switch focus to auditory solutions like text-to-speech software.
- Refer the client for a new eyeglass prescription, as the difficulty with text suggests a magnification issue.
Explanation: The correct answer is B. The client has mastered the basic skill of eccentric viewing but is struggling with the more complex demands of reading continuous text. This requires additional skills like smooth tracking and maintaining fixation while moving across a line. The steady-eye strategy combined with a low-tech tool like a typoscope directly addresses the observed functional problem of losing one's place. This demonstrates the OTR's ability to analyze the activity demands and grade the intervention appropriately.
Question 19
A client with idiopathic Parkinson's disease completed 4 weeks of LSVT BIG therapy. At reassessment, their Timed Up and Go (TUG) score improved from 17 seconds to 14 seconds (a clinically significant change). The client reports feeling more confident. However, their spouse reports the client has started having significant freezing of gait episodes when turning in the kitchen.
Which plan modification BEST addresses the full clinical picture?
- Maintain the LSVT BIG exercises for amplitude but add specific training with external cues (e.g., visual lines on floor, rhythmic auditory cues) for turning. (correct answer)
- Continue with the standard LSVT BIG protocol for another 4 weeks to achieve an even greater effect on movement amplitude.
- Discharge the client with a home exercise program for LSVT BIG, as they have met goals for functional mobility shown by the TUG.
- Focus solely on caregiver training for how to manage freezing episodes, as the client's mobility has otherwise improved.
Explanation: When you encounter Parkinson's disease cases involving movement interventions, always consider both the quantitative improvements AND new functional challenges that emerge. This question tests your ability to modify treatment plans based on the complete clinical picture, not just isolated improvements.
The correct answer is A because it demonstrates comprehensive clinical reasoning. While the client showed measurable improvement in the TUG test and increased confidence from LSVT BIG therapy, a new significant problem emerged—freezing of gait during turns. The best approach maintains the proven amplitude training while specifically addressing the new deficit with evidence-based external cueing strategies. Visual floor cues and rhythmic auditory cues are well-established interventions for freezing episodes in Parkinson's disease.
Option B ignores the new freezing episodes entirely, focusing only on the positive TUG results. Continuing standard protocol without modification fails to address the spouse's safety concerns about kitchen turning.
Option C represents premature discharge based on a single outcome measure while overlooking a significant new functional limitation that could lead to falls.
Option D abandons the successful motor intervention and shifts entirely to caregiver training, which doesn't address the client's motor learning needs or capitalize on their demonstrated ability to improve with direct intervention.
Remember for the NBCOT: Treatment modification questions often present mixed outcomes—some improvements alongside new challenges. The best answers integrate successful elements while directly targeting emerging deficits, rather than continuing unchanged protocols or prematurely shifting to compensatory-only approaches.
Question 20
An OTR provided caregiver training on using task segmentation and the "hand-under-hand" technique for dressing a client with moderate dementia. After two weeks, the caregiver reports that dressing times have doubled and the client has become increasingly agitated, frequently yelling "Leave me alone!" during the process.
Based on this feedback, what is the MOST appropriate modification to the intervention strategy?
- Advise the caregiver to be more firm and consistent, as the client needs to adjust to the new routine.
- Re-train the caregiver on the same techniques, assuming they were implemented incorrectly.
- Recommend the caregiver dress the client completely to minimize agitation and ensure task completion.
- Shift the strategy to environmental modification, such as laying out clothes in sequence and using simplified, adaptive clothing. (correct answer)
Explanation: The correct answer is D. The client's behavioral response (agitation, yelling) is critical monitoring data indicating the current hands-on approach is perceived as threatening or confusing. The best modification is to switch to a less invasive, more compensatory strategy. Environmental modifications reduce the cognitive load on the client and promote independence without the need for constant physical and verbal cueing, which can be a source of agitation in dementia care.