Multivariable Calculus Quiz: Limits And Continuity Multivariable
17 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Limits And Continuity MultivariableQuestion 1 of 17

Consider the function F(x,y)={x3y3x2+y2if (x,y)(0,0)Lif (x,y)=(0,0)F(x,y) = \begin{cases} \frac{x^3 - y^3}{x^2 + y^2} & \text{if } (x,y) \neq (0,0) \\ L & \text{if } (x,y) = (0,0) \end{cases} . For what value of LL is FF continuous at (0,0)(0,0), and what can be concluded about the partial derivatives Fx(0,0)F_x(0,0) and Fy(0,0)F_y(0,0)?

L=0L = 0; both Fx(0,0)F_x(0,0) and Fy(0,0)F_y(0,0) exist and equal 0 since the limit of FF exists
L=0L = 0; Fx(0,0)=1F_x(0,0) = 1 and Fy(0,0)=1F_y(0,0) = -1 based on the directional behavior of the numerator
No value of LL makes FF continuous because approaching along x=yx = y gives a different limit than along x=yx = -y
L=0L = 0; Fx(0,0)F_x(0,0) and Fy(0,0)F_y(0,0) do not exist because the directional derivatives along the coordinate axes are undefined
← Back to quizzes

Multivariable Calculus Quiz

Multivariable Calculus Quiz: Limits And Continuity Multivariable

Practice Limits And Continuity Multivariable in Multivariable Calculus with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Limits And Continuity Multivariable, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Multivariable Calculus.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Consider the function F(x,y)={x3y3x2+y2if (x,y)(0,0)Lif (x,y)=(0,0)F(x,y) = \begin{cases} \frac{x^3 - y^3}{x^2 + y^2} & \text{if } (x,y) \neq (0,0) \\ L & \text{if } (x,y) = (0,0) \end{cases} . For what value of LL is FF continuous at (0,0)(0,0), and what can be concluded about the partial derivatives Fx(0,0)F_x(0,0) and Fy(0,0)F_y(0,0)?

  1. L=0L = 0; both Fx(0,0)F_x(0,0) and Fy(0,0)F_y(0,0) exist and equal 0 since the limit of FF exists
  2. L=0L = 0; Fx(0,0)=1F_x(0,0) = 1 and Fy(0,0)=1F_y(0,0) = -1 based on the directional behavior of the numerator (correct answer)
  3. No value of LL makes FF continuous because approaching along x=yx = y gives a different limit than along x=yx = -y
  4. L=0L = 0; Fx(0,0)F_x(0,0) and Fy(0,0)F_y(0,0) do not exist because the directional derivatives along the coordinate axes are undefined
Explanation: For continuity, we need lim(x,y)(0,0)x3y3x2+y2=L\lim_{(x,y) \to (0,0)} \frac{x^3 - y^3}{x^2 + y^2} = L. Using polar coordinates: r3cos3θr3sin3θr2=r(cos3θsin3θ)0\frac{r^3\cos^3\theta - r^3\sin^3\theta}{r^2} = r(\cos^3\theta - \sin^3\theta) \to 0 as r0r \to 0, so L=0L = 0. For partial derivatives: Fx(0,0)=limh0F(h,0)F(0,0)h=limh0h3/h20h=limh0hh=1F_x(0,0) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{F(h,0) - F(0,0)}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{h^3/h^2 - 0}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{h}{h} = 1. Similarly, Fy(0,0)=limh0F(0,h)F(0,0)h=limh0h3/h20h=limh0hh=1F_y(0,0) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{F(0,h) - F(0,0)}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{-h^3/h^2 - 0}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{-h}{h} = -1. Choice A incorrectly assumes partial derivatives are 0. Choice C is wrong about continuity. Choice D incorrectly claims partial derivatives don't exist.

Question 2

Let the function ff be defined as f(x,y)=1f(x,y) = 1 if xx and yy are both rational numbers, and f(x,y)=0f(x,y) = 0 otherwise. Which of the following statements best describes the continuity of this function?

  1. The function is continuous at all points (x,y)(x,y) where xx and yy are both rational.
  2. The function is continuous at all points (x,y)(x,y) where at least one of xx or yy is irrational.
  3. The function is continuous nowhere on the plane R2\mathbb{R}^2. (correct answer)
  4. The function is continuous only at the origin (0,0)(0,0).
Explanation: This function is a two-dimensional analogue of the Dirichlet function. To be continuous at a point (a,b)(a,b), the limit lim(x,y)(a,b)f(x,y)\lim_{(x,y) \to (a,b)} f(x,y) must exist and equal f(a,b)f(a,b). However, in any arbitrarily small neighborhood (an open disk) around any point (a,b)(a,b), there exist points where both coordinates are rational and points where at least one coordinate is irrational. This means that in any neighborhood of any point, the function takes on both values, 0 and 1. The function values do not approach a single value LL as (x,y)(x,y) approaches (a,b)(a,b). Therefore, the limit does not exist at any point in R2\mathbb{R}^2, and the function is continuous nowhere.

Question 3

Let a function be defined as: f(x,y)={0if y0 or yx21if 0<y<x2f(x,y) = \begin{cases} 0 & \text{if } y \le 0 \text{ or } y \ge x^2 \\ 1 & \text{if } 0 < y < x^2 \end{cases} Which of the following best describes the limit of this function as (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \to (0,0)?

  1. The limit does not exist, because paths can be chosen to approach the origin from within the region where f=1f=1 and from the region where f=0f=0. (correct answer)
  2. The limit is 1, because there exist paths to the origin along which the function maintains the value 1 throughout the approach.
  3. The limit is 0, because for any linear path y=mxy=mx with m>0m>0, the function values approach 0 as we get sufficiently close to the origin.
  4. The limit is 1/21/2, representing the weighted average of the function values in the different regions surrounding the origin.
Explanation: When evaluating limits of piecewise functions in multivariable calculus, you need to check whether the function approaches the same value along all possible paths to the point. If different paths yield different limiting values, the limit does not exist. Let's analyze this function's behavior near the origin. The key insight is understanding the geometry: the parabola y=x2y = x^2 passes through (0,0)(0,0), creating a boundary between regions where f=1f = 1 (below the parabola, above the x-axis) and f=0f = 0 (elsewhere). Now consider different approaches to (0,0)(0,0). If you approach along the x-axis where y=0y = 0, you're always in the region where f=0f = 0. However, if you approach along a path like y=x22y = \frac{x^2}{2} (which stays below the parabola y=x2y = x^2 near the origin), you're in the region where f=1f = 1. Since these paths give different limiting values, the limit doesn't exist. Answer A correctly identifies this reasoning. Answer B is wrong because the existence of paths where f=1f = 1 doesn't establish the limit—you need consistency across all paths. Answer C makes an error: linear paths y=mxy = mx with m>0m > 0 actually enter the region where f=0f = 0 only when mxx2mx \geq x^2, which happens when xmx \geq m, but near the origin when x<mx < m, we have mx<x2mx < x^2, so f=1f = 1. Answer D incorrectly suggests limits can be "averages"—limits are about consistency, not weighted values. Study tip: For piecewise function limits, always test multiple path types, especially along boundary curves, not just straight lines.

Question 4

Consider the function f(x,y)=x2yx4+y2f(x,y) = \frac{x^2 y}{x^4 + y^2}. A student calculates the limit of f(x,y)f(x,y) as (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \to (0,0) along any line y=mxy=mx and finds that limx0f(x,mx)=0\lim_{x \to 0} f(x, mx) = 0 for all real numbers mm. Based on this information, what can be concluded about lim(x,y)(0,0)f(x,y)\lim_{(x,y) \to (0,0)} f(x,y)?

  1. The limit is 0, because the limit is 0 along all linear paths of approach to the origin.
  2. The limit is 1/21/2, which can be found by approaching the origin along the path y=x2y=x^2.
  3. The limit does not exist, because the limit value depends on the path of approach to the origin. (correct answer)
  4. The limit cannot be determined without also checking all paths of the form x=kyx=ky.
Explanation: The fact that the limit is 0 along all straight-line paths y=mxy=mx is not sufficient to prove the existence of the overall limit. To show the limit does not exist, we must find two paths that yield different limit values. Along the path y=x2y=x^2, the function becomes f(x,x2)=x2(x2)x4+(x2)2=x42x4=12f(x, x^2) = \frac{x^2(x^2)}{x^4 + (x^2)^2} = \frac{x^4}{2x^4} = \frac{1}{2} for x0x \neq 0. The limit along this path is 1/21/2. Since the limit along linear paths is 0 and the limit along the parabolic path y=x2y=x^2 is 1/21/2, the overall limit does not exist.

Question 5

Consider the function f(x,y)=x2yx4+y2f(x,y) = \frac{x^2y}{x^4 + y^2} for (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \neq (0,0). Which statement best describes the behavior of f(x,y)f(x,y) as (x,y)(x,y) approaches (0,0)(0,0)?

  1. The limit exists and equals 0 because the numerator has higher degree than the denominator along any path
  2. The limit does not exist because approaching along y=mx2y = mx^2 gives different values for different values of mm (correct answer)
  3. The limit exists and equals 0 because polar coordinate substitution shows f(rcosθ,rsinθ)Cr|f(r\cos\theta, r\sin\theta)| \leq Cr for some constant CC
  4. The limit does not exist because the function is undefined on both coordinate axes near the origin
Explanation: To check if the limit exists, we test different paths. Along y=mx2y = mx^2: f(x,mx2)=x2(mx2)x4+(mx2)2=mx4x4+m2x4=m1+m2f(x,mx^2) = \frac{x^2(mx^2)}{x^4 + (mx^2)^2} = \frac{mx^4}{x^4 + m^2x^4} = \frac{m}{1 + m^2}. This gives different values for different mm (e.g., m=1m=1 gives 12\frac{1}{2}, m=2m=2 gives 25\frac{2}{5}), so the limit doesn't exist. Choice A is wrong because degree comparison doesn't work here. Choice C is incorrect because the polar analysis would give frcosθ|f| \leq r|\cos\theta| which suggests the limit is 0, but this misses the problematic paths. Choice D is wrong because the function being undefined on axes doesn't prevent a limit from existing.

Question 6

Let h(x,y)={x2yx2+2y2if (x,y)(0,0)0if (x,y)=(0,0)h(x,y) = \begin{cases} \frac{x^2y}{x^2 + 2y^2} & \text{if } (x,y) \neq (0,0) \\ 0 & \text{if } (x,y) = (0,0) \end{cases} . Which statement correctly describes the continuity and differentiability of hh at (0,0)(0,0)?

  1. hh is continuous but not differentiable at (0,0)(0,0) because the partial derivatives exist but are not continuous there (correct answer)
  2. hh is continuous and differentiable at (0,0)(0,0) because all directional derivatives exist and the function approaches 0 uniformly
  3. hh is neither continuous nor differentiable at (0,0)(0,0) because the function has different limits along different parabolic paths
  4. hh is continuous and differentiable at (0,0)(0,0) because h(x,y)x2|h(x,y)| \leq \frac{|x|}{\sqrt{2}} which ensures both continuity and differentiability
Explanation: For continuity: h(x,y)=x2yx2+2y2x2y2y2=x22|h(x,y)| = |\frac{x^2y}{x^2 + 2y^2}| \leq |\frac{x^2y}{2y^2}| = \frac{|x|^2}{2} when y0y \neq 0. More precisely, h(x,y)x2yx2+2y2xy2x2+y2220|h(x,y)| \leq \frac{|x|^2|y|}{x^2 + 2y^2} \leq \frac{|x||y|}{\sqrt{2}} \leq \frac{x^2 + y^2}{2\sqrt{2}} \to 0, so hh is continuous. For partial derivatives: hx(0,0)=limt0h(t,0)0t=0h_x(0,0) = \lim_{t \to 0} \frac{h(t,0) - 0}{t} = 0 and hy(0,0)=limt0h(0,t)0t=0h_y(0,0) = \lim_{t \to 0} \frac{h(0,t) - 0}{t} = 0. However, hx(x,y)=4xy3(x2+2y2)2h_x(x,y) = \frac{4xy^3}{(x^2 + 2y^2)^2} for (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \neq (0,0). Along y=xy = x, hx(x,x)=4x4(3x2)2=49h_x(x,x) = \frac{4x^4}{(3x^2)^2} = \frac{4}{9}, which doesn't approach hx(0,0)=0h_x(0,0) = 0. So partial derivatives exist but aren't continuous, meaning hh is not differentiable. Choices B and D incorrectly conclude differentiability. Choice C is wrong about continuity.

Question 7

Consider the piecewise function G(x,y)={sin(x2+y2)x2+y2if x2+y20kif x2+y2=0G(x,y) = \begin{cases} \frac{\sin(x^2 + y^2)}{x^2 + y^2} & \text{if } x^2 + y^2 \neq 0 \\ k & \text{if } x^2 + y^2 = 0 \end{cases} . For GG to be continuous everywhere, what must kk equal, and what additional property does GG have at (0,0)(0,0)?

  1. k=1k = 1; GG is differentiable at (0,0)(0,0) with G(0,0)=(0,0)\nabla G(0,0) = (0,0) because the sine function is smooth
  2. k=0k = 0; GG is not differentiable at (0,0)(0,0) because the limit defining Gx(0,0)\frac{\partial G}{\partial x}(0,0) does not exist
  3. k=1k = 1; GG is not differentiable at (0,0)(0,0) because partial derivatives exist but the function is not differentiable in all directions
  4. k=1k = 1; GG is differentiable at (0,0)(0,0) but G\nabla G is not continuous there because GxG_x and GyG_y are not continuous at (0,0)(0,0) (correct answer)
Explanation: For continuity at (0,0)(0,0): lim(x,y)(0,0)sin(x2+y2)x2+y2=limt0+sintt=1\lim_{(x,y) \to (0,0)} \frac{\sin(x^2 + y^2)}{x^2 + y^2} = \lim_{t \to 0^+} \frac{\sin t}{t} = 1, so k=1k = 1. For differentiability: Gx(0,0)=limh0G(h,0)1h=limh0sin(h2)h21h=limh0sin(h2)h2h3G_x(0,0) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{G(h,0) - 1}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{\frac{\sin(h^2)}{h^2} - 1}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{\sin(h^2) - h^2}{h^3}. Using sinu=uu36+O(u5)\sin u = u - \frac{u^3}{6} + O(u^5): sin(h2)=h2h66+O(h10)\sin(h^2) = h^2 - \frac{h^6}{6} + O(h^{10}), so Gx(0,0)=limh0h6/6h3=0G_x(0,0) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{-h^6/6}{h^3} = 0. Similarly Gy(0,0)=0G_y(0,0) = 0. For (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \neq (0,0): Gx=2xcos(x2+y2)(x2+y2)2xsin(x2+y2)(x2+y2)2G_x = \frac{2x\cos(x^2+y^2)(x^2+y^2) - 2x\sin(x^2+y^2)}{(x^2+y^2)^2}. As (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \to (0,0), this doesn't approach 0, so G\nabla G isn't continuous at (0,0)(0,0). Choices A and C have wrong conclusions about differentiability. Choice B has wrong value for kk.

Question 8

Let Λ(x,y,z)={xyzx2+y2+z2if (x,y,z)(0,0,0)0if (x,y,z)=(0,0,0)\Lambda(x,y,z) = \begin{cases} \frac{xyz}{x^2 + y^2 + z^2} & \text{if } (x,y,z) \neq (0,0,0) \\ 0 & \text{if } (x,y,z) = (0,0,0) \end{cases} . Which statement correctly analyzes the continuity of Λ\Lambda at the origin?

  1. Λ\Lambda is continuous at (0,0,0)(0,0,0) because Λ(x,y,z)x2+y2+z23|\Lambda(x,y,z)| \leq \frac{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2}}{3} by the AM-GM inequality
  2. Λ\Lambda is discontinuous at (0,0,0)(0,0,0) because along the curve (t,t,t)(t, t, t), the function approaches 13\frac{1}{3} as t0t \to 0
  3. Λ\Lambda is continuous at (0,0,0)(0,0,0) because in spherical coordinates, Λ(ρsinϕcosθ,ρsinϕsinθ,ρcosϕ)=ρf(ϕ,θ)\Lambda(\rho\sin\phi\cos\theta, \rho\sin\phi\sin\theta, \rho\cos\phi) = \rho f(\phi,\theta) where ff is bounded (correct answer)
  4. Λ\Lambda is discontinuous at (0,0,0)(0,0,0) because the function can approach different non-zero values along different straight line paths through the origin
Explanation: Using spherical coordinates x=ρsinϕcosθx = \rho\sin\phi\cos\theta, y=ρsinϕsinθy = \rho\sin\phi\sin\theta, z=ρcosϕz = \rho\cos\phi: Λ=ρ3sin2ϕcosϕcosθsinθρ2=ρsin2ϕcosϕcosθsinθ\Lambda = \frac{\rho^3\sin^2\phi\cos\phi\cos\theta\sin\theta}{\rho^2} = \rho\sin^2\phi\cos\phi\cos\theta\sin\theta. Since sin2ϕcosϕcosθsinθsin2ϕcosϕ229|\sin^2\phi\cos\phi\cos\theta\sin\theta| \leq |\sin^2\phi\cos\phi| \leq \frac{2\sqrt{2}}{9} (maximum when sinϕ=23\sin\phi = \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}), we have ΛCρ|\Lambda| \leq C\rho for some constant CC, so Λ0\Lambda \to 0 as ρ0\rho \to 0. Choice A uses wrong inequality (xyz(x2+y2+z2)3/233|xyz| \leq \frac{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}}{3\sqrt{3}} by AM-GM, but this doesn't give the stated bound). Choice B: along (t,t,t)(t,t,t), Λ=t33t2=t30\Lambda = \frac{t^3}{3t^2} = \frac{t}{3} \to 0. Choice D is incorrect; while different paths give different approach rates, they all approach 0.

Question 9

Define Ξ(x,y)={ex2+y21x2+y2if (x,y)(0,0)αif (x,y)=(0,0)\Xi(x,y) = \begin{cases} \frac{e^{x^2 + y^2} - 1}{x^2 + y^2} & \text{if } (x,y) \neq (0,0) \\ \alpha & \text{if } (x,y) = (0,0) \end{cases} . For Ξ\Xi to be continuous at (0,0)(0,0), what must α\alpha equal, and what can be said about the differentiability of Ξ\Xi there?

  1. α=1\alpha = 1; Ξ\Xi is differentiable at (0,0)(0,0) with both partial derivatives equal to 0 because of the exponential's smoothness
  2. α=0\alpha = 0; Ξ\Xi is not differentiable at (0,0)(0,0) because the exponential function grows too rapidly near the origin
  3. α=1\alpha = 1; Ξ\Xi is not differentiable at (0,0)(0,0) because the partial derivatives exist but are not continuous there (correct answer)
  4. α=1\alpha = 1; Ξ\Xi is differentiable at (0,0)(0,0) with Ξx(0,0)=Ξy(0,0)=0\Xi_x(0,0) = \Xi_y(0,0) = 0, and Ξ\nabla \Xi is continuous at (0,0)(0,0)
Explanation: For continuity: lim(x,y)(0,0)ex2+y21x2+y2=limt0+et1t=1\lim_{(x,y) \to (0,0)} \frac{e^{x^2 + y^2} - 1}{x^2 + y^2} = \lim_{t \to 0^+} \frac{e^t - 1}{t} = 1, so α=1\alpha = 1. For partial derivatives: Ξx(0,0)=limh0Ξ(h,0)1h=limh0eh21h21h=limh0eh21h2h3\Xi_x(0,0) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{\Xi(h,0) - 1}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{\frac{e^{h^2} - 1}{h^2} - 1}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{e^{h^2} - 1 - h^2}{h^3}. Using eu=1+u+u22+u36+O(u4)e^u = 1 + u + \frac{u^2}{2} + \frac{u^3}{6} + O(u^4): eh2=1+h2+h42+O(h6)e^{h^2} = 1 + h^2 + \frac{h^4}{2} + O(h^6), so Ξx(0,0)=limh0h4/2h3=0\Xi_x(0,0) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{h^4/2}{h^3} = 0. Similarly Ξy(0,0)=0\Xi_y(0,0) = 0. For (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \neq (0,0): Ξx=2xex2+y2(x2+y2)2x(ex2+y21)(x2+y2)2\Xi_x = \frac{2xe^{x^2+y^2}(x^2+y^2) - 2x(e^{x^2+y^2}-1)}{(x^2+y^2)^2}. As (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \to (0,0), this approaches lim2x102x00\lim \frac{2x \cdot 1 \cdot 0 - 2x \cdot 0}{0}, which requires L'Hôpital's rule analysis and doesn't simply approach 0. The partial derivatives are not continuous at (0,0)(0,0). Choices A and D incorrectly conclude about continuity of Ξ\nabla \Xi. Choice B has wrong α\alpha.

Question 10

Define ϕ(x,y)={x4+y4(x2+y2)3/2if (x,y)(0,0)0if (x,y)=(0,0)\phi(x,y) = \begin{cases} \frac{x^4 + y^4}{(x^2 + y^2)^{3/2}} & \text{if } (x,y) \neq (0,0) \\ 0 & \text{if } (x,y) = (0,0) \end{cases} . What is the correct analysis of ϕ\phi near (0,0)(0,0)?

  1. ϕ\phi is discontinuous at (0,0)(0,0) because the limit as (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \to (0,0) equals 2\sqrt{2}, not 0
  2. ϕ\phi is continuous at (0,0)(0,0) because in polar coordinates, ϕ(rcosθ,rsinθ)=r(cos4θ+sin4θ)0\phi(r\cos\theta, r\sin\theta) = r(\cos^4\theta + \sin^4\theta) \to 0 as r0r \to 0 (correct answer)
  3. ϕ\phi is discontinuous at (0,0)(0,0) because along the line x=yx = y, the function approaches a non-zero constant
  4. ϕ\phi is continuous at (0,0)(0,0) because the numerator has degree 4 while the denominator has degree 3, ensuring the limit is 0
Explanation: Converting to polar coordinates: ϕ(rcosθ,rsinθ)=r4(cos4θ+sin4θ)(r2)3/2=r4(cos4θ+sin4θ)r3=r(cos4θ+sin4θ)\phi(r\cos\theta, r\sin\theta) = \frac{r^4(\cos^4\theta + \sin^4\theta)}{(r^2)^{3/2}} = \frac{r^4(\cos^4\theta + \sin^4\theta)}{r^3} = r(\cos^4\theta + \sin^4\theta). Since cos4θ+sin4θ\cos^4\theta + \sin^4\theta is bounded (actually between 12\frac{1}{2} and 1), we have ϕ(x,y)r0|\phi(x,y)| \leq r \to 0 as r0r \to 0. So ϕ\phi is continuous at (0,0)(0,0). Choice A is wrong about the limit value. Choice C: along x=yx = y, ϕ(t,t)=2t4(2t2)3/2=2t423/2t3=t20\phi(t,t) = \frac{2t^4}{(2t^2)^{3/2}} = \frac{2t^4}{2^{3/2}t^3} = \frac{t}{\sqrt{2}} \to 0. Choice D gives wrong reasoning (degree comparison doesn't directly apply with fractional exponents).

Question 11

Let f(x,y)=x2+y21f(x,y) = x^2 + y^2 - 1 and g(t)=tg(t) = \sqrt{t}. The composite function h(x,y)=g(f(x,y))h(x,y) = g(f(x,y)) is continuous on which of the following sets?

  1. The set of all points (x,y)(x,y) in R2\mathbb{R}^2 such that x2+y2>1x^2+y^2 > 1.
  2. The set of all points (x,y)(x,y) in R2\mathbb{R}^2 such that x2+y21x^2+y^2 \ge 1. (correct answer)
  3. The set of all points (x,y)(x,y) in R2\mathbb{R}^2 such that x2+y21x^2+y^2 \neq 1.
  4. The set of all points (x,y)(x,y) in R2\mathbb{R}^2.
Explanation: The function f(x,y)f(x,y) is a polynomial and is continuous everywhere on R2\mathbb{R}^2. The function g(t)=tg(t) = \sqrt{t} is continuous on its domain, which is t0t \ge 0. The composite function h(x,y)=g(f(x,y))h(x,y) = g(f(x,y)) is continuous wherever f(x,y)f(x,y) is in the domain of gg. This requires the argument of the square root to be non-negative, so we must have f(x,y)0f(x,y) \ge 0. This implies x2+y210x^2+y^2-1 \ge 0, which simplifies to x2+y21x^2+y^2 \ge 1. This set represents all points on or outside the unit circle centered at the origin.

Question 12

Consider the function defined by f(x,y)=x2y2x2+y2f(x,y) = \frac{x^2-y^2}{x^2+y^2}. Which of the following statements provides the most accurate description of the limit of f(x,y)f(x,y) as (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \to (0,0)?

  1. The limit is 0, as can be shown by converting to polar coordinates.
  2. The limit is 1, as shown by approaching the origin along the x-axis.
  3. The limit does not exist because the limit value depends on the angle of approach θ\theta. (correct answer)
  4. The limit does not exist because the function is undefined at the origin.
Explanation: To analyze this limit, we convert to polar coordinates by setting x=rcosθx = r\cos\theta and y=rsinθy = r\sin\theta. The expression becomes f(r,θ)=r2cos2θr2sin2θr2cos2θ+r2sin2θ=r2(cos2θsin2θ)r2(cos2θ+sin2θ)=cos(2θ)f(r, \theta) = \frac{r^2\cos^2\theta - r^2\sin^2\theta}{r^2\cos^2\theta + r^2\sin^2\theta} = \frac{r^2(\cos^2\theta - \sin^2\theta)}{r^2(\cos^2\theta + \sin^2\theta)} = \cos(2\theta). The value of the function depends only on the angle θ\theta and not on the radius rr. As we approach the origin (r0)(r \to 0), the value of the function can be any value in [1,1][-1, 1] depending on the path's angle. For example, along the x-axis (θ=0\theta=0), the limit is cos(0)=1\cos(0)=1. Along the y-axis (θ=π/2\theta=\pi/2), the limit is cos(π)=1\cos(\pi)=-1. Since the limit value is path-dependent, the limit does not exist.

Question 13

Consider the function f(x,y)=2xyx2+y2f(x,y) = \frac{2xy}{x^2+y^2} for (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \neq (0,0) and f(0,0)=0f(0,0)=0. Which of the following statements accurately describes the function at the origin (0,0)(0,0)?

  1. The function is continuous at (0,0)(0,0) because its partial derivatives fx(0,0)f_x(0,0) and fy(0,0)f_y(0,0) both exist.
  2. The function is not continuous at (0,0)(0,0), and its partial derivatives fx(0,0)f_x(0,0) and fy(0,0)f_y(0,0) do not exist.
  3. The function is continuous at (0,0)(0,0), but its partial derivatives fx(0,0)f_x(0,0) and fy(0,0)f_y(0,0) do not exist.
  4. The function is not continuous at (0,0)(0,0), but its partial derivatives fx(0,0)f_x(0,0) and fy(0,0)f_y(0,0) both exist. (correct answer)
Explanation: When analyzing continuity and differentiability at a point in multivariable calculus, you need to check these properties independently—one doesn't guarantee the other. Let's first check continuity at (0,0)(0,0). For continuity, we need lim(x,y)(0,0)f(x,y)=f(0,0)=0\lim_{(x,y) \to (0,0)} f(x,y) = f(0,0) = 0. Let's approach along the line y=mxy = mx: limx02x(mx)x2+(mx)2=limx02mx2x2(1+m2)=2m1+m2\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{2x(mx)}{x^2 + (mx)^2} = \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{2mx^2}{x^2(1+m^2)} = \frac{2m}{1+m^2} This limit depends on mm, meaning different paths give different limits. Since the limit doesn't exist, the function is not continuous at (0,0)(0,0). Now for partial derivatives. Using the definition: fx(0,0)=limh0f(h,0)f(0,0)h=limh000h=0f_x(0,0) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(h,0) - f(0,0)}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{0 - 0}{h} = 0 Similarly, fy(0,0)=0f_y(0,0) = 0. Both partial derivatives exist. Answer D is correct: the function is not continuous but has existing partial derivatives at (0,0)(0,0). Answer A incorrectly assumes that existing partial derivatives imply continuity—this is false in multivariable calculus. Answer B incorrectly claims the partial derivatives don't exist when they clearly do. Answer C incorrectly states the function is continuous when we showed it's not. Remember: In multivariable calculus, partial derivatives can exist even when the function isn't continuous. Always test continuity using limits along different paths, and compute partial derivatives using the definition when working at potentially problematic points.

Question 14

On what set SS is the function f(x,y)=ln(x2+y21)xf(x,y) = \frac{\ln(x^2+y^2-1)}{x} continuous?

  1. S={(x,y)R2x2+y2>1 and x0}S = \{(x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \mid x^2+y^2 > 1 \text{ and } x \neq 0 \}. (correct answer)
  2. S={(x,y)R2x2+y21 and x0}S = \{(x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \mid x^2+y^2 \ge 1 \text{ and } x \neq 0 \}.
  3. S={(x,y)R2x2+y2>1}S = \{(x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \mid x^2+y^2 > 1 \}.
  4. S={(x,y)R2x>0}S = \{(x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \mid x > 0 \}.
Explanation: A function is continuous on its domain. We need to find the domain of f(x,y)f(x,y). There are two conditions for f(x,y)f(x,y) to be defined. First, the argument of the natural logarithm must be strictly positive: x2+y21>0x^2+y^2-1 > 0, which means x2+y2>1x^2+y^2 > 1. This is the set of points outside the unit circle. Second, the denominator cannot be zero, so x0x \neq 0. The function is continuous on the set of points satisfying both conditions simultaneously, which is the region outside the unit circle, excluding the y-axis.

Question 15

Suppose f:R2Rf: \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R} is a function for which lim(x,y)(a,b)f(x,y)=L\lim_{(x,y) \to (a,b)} f(x,y) = L. Which of the following statements must be true as a consequence?

  1. The function f(x,y)f(x,y) must be defined at (a,b)(a,b) and f(a,b)=Lf(a,b)=L.
  2. For any real number mm, the limit limxaf(x,b+m(xa))\lim_{x \to a} f(x, b+m(x-a)) exists and is equal to LL. (correct answer)
  3. If limxaf(x,g(x))=L\lim_{x \to a} f(x, g(x)) = L for several different path functions y=g(x)y=g(x), then the overall limit must be LL.
  4. The partial derivatives fx(a,b)f_x(a,b) and fy(a,b)f_y(a,b) must exist.
Explanation: The definition of the limit lim(x,y)(a,b)f(x,y)=L\lim_{(x,y) \to (a,b)} f(x,y) = L means that f(x,y)f(x,y) approaches LL as (x,y)(x,y) approaches (a,b)(a,b) along any path. Statement B describes the limit along any straight-line path through (a,b)(a,b), which is a specific subset of all possible paths. If the general limit exists, the limit along any specific path must also exist and be equal to the general limit. Statement A is the definition of continuity, which is a stronger condition than the existence of a limit. Statement C is the converse, which is false; checking a finite number of paths (or even all linear paths) is not sufficient. Statement D is also not necessarily true; a function can have a limit at a point without being differentiable there.

Question 16

For the function f(x,y)=ex2+y21x2+y2f(x,y) = \frac{e^{x^2+y^2} - 1}{x^2+y^2}, the limit as (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \to (0,0) exists. What value should be assigned to f(0,0)f(0,0) to make the function continuous at the origin?

  1. 00
  2. It is impossible to make the function continuous at the origin.
  3. ee
  4. 11 (correct answer)
Explanation: When you encounter a function that's undefined at a point but need to determine continuity, you're dealing with removable discontinuities. The key is finding the limit as you approach that point and seeing if assigning that limit value makes the function continuous. Here, f(x,y)=ex2+y21x2+y2f(x,y) = \frac{e^{x^2+y^2} - 1}{x^2+y^2} is undefined at (0,0)(0,0) because both numerator and denominator equal zero. To find lim(x,y)(0,0)f(x,y)\lim_{(x,y) \to (0,0)} f(x,y), let u=x2+y2u = x^2 + y^2. As (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \to (0,0), we have u0u \to 0, so: lim(x,y)(0,0)ex2+y21x2+y2=limu0eu1u\lim_{(x,y) \to (0,0)} \frac{e^{x^2+y^2} - 1}{x^2+y^2} = \lim_{u \to 0} \frac{e^u - 1}{u} This is the standard limit definition of the derivative of eue^u at u=0u = 0. Since ddueu=eu\frac{d}{du}e^u = e^u, we get e0=1e^0 = 1. Therefore, defining f(0,0)=1f(0,0) = 1 makes the function continuous. Choice A (00) would create a jump discontinuity since the limit is 11, not 00. Choice B is incorrect because we just showed the limit exists and equals 11, so continuity is achievable by proper definition. Choice C (ee) confuses the general derivative formula ddxex=ex\frac{d}{dx}e^x = e^x with this specific limit where the exponent approaches 00. Study tip: When you see indeterminate forms like 00\frac{0}{0} in multivariable limits, look for connections to single-variable derivative definitions, especially with exponential and trigonometric functions. The limit limh0eh1h=1\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{e^h - 1}{h} = 1 is fundamental and appears frequently.

Question 17

Let f(x,y)=(x2+y2)cos(1x2+y2)f(x,y) = (x^2+y^2) \cos(\frac{1}{x^2+y^2}) for (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \neq (0,0). Which statement correctly describes the limit of f(x,y)f(x,y) as (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \to (0,0)?

  1. The limit does not exist because cos(1x2+y2)\cos(\frac{1}{x^2+y^2}) oscillates infinitely as (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \to (0,0).
  2. The limit is 0, which can be established by applying the Squeeze Theorem with appropriate bounding functions. (correct answer)
  3. The limit is 1, because the cosine term approaches cos(0)=1\cos(0)=1 as (x,y)(x,y) approaches the origin.
  4. The limit depends on the path of approach, equaling 1 along the x-axis and -1 along the y-axis.
Explanation: We can use the Squeeze Theorem to evaluate this limit. We know that for any non-zero argument, 1cos(1x2+y2)1-1 \le \cos(\frac{1}{x^2+y^2}) \le 1. Multiplying all parts of this inequality by the non-negative term x2+y2x^2+y^2 gives (x2+y2)(x2+y2)cos(1x2+y2)(x2+y2)-(x^2+y^2) \le (x^2+y^2) \cos(\frac{1}{x^2+y^2}) \le (x^2+y^2). As (x,y)(0,0)(x,y) \to (0,0), both (x2+y2)-(x^2+y^2) and (x2+y2)(x^2+y^2) approach 0. Therefore, by the Squeeze Theorem, lim(x,y)(0,0)f(x,y)=0\lim_{(x,y) \to (0,0)} f(x,y) = 0.