MPJE: Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination Quiz: Prescription Validity
20 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Prescription ValidityQuestion 1 of 20

On June 1st, a patient requests a refill of their enalapril prescription. The pharmacist sees the prescription has 5 remaining refills. The pharmacist is aware that the prescribing physician passed away on May 15th.

The pharmacist can dispense all remaining refills as the prescription was valid when originally issued.
The pharmacist may dispense a one-time 30-day supply in good faith to prevent interruption of therapy.
The pharmacist can continue to dispense refills for up to 6 months after the prescriber's death.
The pharmacist should not dispense further refills, as the prescriber-patient relationship and the prescription are legally void.
← Back to quizzes

MPJE: Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination Quiz

MPJE: Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination Quiz: Prescription Validity

Practice Prescription Validity in MPJE: Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Prescription Validity, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for MPJE: Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

On June 1st, a patient requests a refill of their enalapril prescription. The pharmacist sees the prescription has 5 remaining refills. The pharmacist is aware that the prescribing physician passed away on May 15th.

  1. The pharmacist can dispense all remaining refills as the prescription was valid when originally issued.
  2. The pharmacist may dispense a one-time 30-day supply in good faith to prevent interruption of therapy.
  3. The pharmacist can continue to dispense refills for up to 6 months after the prescriber's death.
  4. The pharmacist should not dispense further refills, as the prescriber-patient relationship and the prescription are legally void. (correct answer)
Explanation: A prescription's validity is predicated on a legitimate patient-prescriber relationship. This relationship terminates upon the death of the prescriber. Therefore, the original prescription and any remaining refills become void. While some states may have provisions for an emergency supply, the most accurate legal answer is that the prescription is no longer valid.

Question 2

A community pharmacy receives a faxed prescription for a fentanyl patch. The cover sheet indicates the patient is enrolled in a Medicare-certified hospice program and the prescription states it is for pain management.

  1. The faxed prescription is invalid; all C-II prescriptions for hospice patients must be hand-delivered to the pharmacy.
  2. The faxed prescription allows the pharmacy to prepare the medication, but the original written prescription must be obtained before dispensing.
  3. The faxed prescription can serve as the original, legal prescription for this patient. (correct answer)
  4. The faxed prescription can only be filled for an emergency 72-hour supply until the original prescription is received.
Explanation: Federal law provides specific exceptions allowing a faxed prescription for a Schedule II substance to serve as the original prescription. One of these exceptions is for a patient enrolled in a hospice care program certified and/or paid for by Medicare. The prescriber or agent must note on the prescription that the patient is a hospice patient.

Question 3

A tourist from Canada presents a prescription for insulin glargine written by their physician in Toronto. The patient is running out of medication and needs one vial to last until they return home.

  1. The prescription is valid for a one-time emergency fill since insulin is a life-sustaining medication.
  2. The prescription can be filled if the pharmacist co-signs it, creating a new order under their authority.
  3. The prescription is invalid because the prescriber is not licensed to practice within a state or territory of the United States. (correct answer)
  4. The prescription is valid as long as the pharmacist can verify the prescriber's identity and license in Canada.
Explanation: For a prescription to be valid in the United States, it must be issued by a practitioner licensed by a jurisdiction within the U.S. (a state, territory, or the District of Columbia). Prescriptions from foreign countries, including Canada and Mexico, are not valid and cannot be legally filled.

Question 4

A dentist writes a prescription for atorvastatin for a patient who mentions during a dental cleaning that they have high cholesterol and ran out of refills from their primary care physician. The prescription contains all required patient and prescriber information.

  1. The prescription is valid, as a dentist's prescribing authority is not limited to any specific formulary.
  2. The prescription is valid, but only if the pharmacist contacts the patient's primary care physician to confirm the diagnosis.
  3. The prescription is invalid because treatment for hyperlipidemia is outside a dentist's scope of practice. (correct answer)
  4. The prescription is invalid, unless the dentist also holds a valid Medical Doctor (MD) license.
Explanation: A prescription must be for a legitimate medical purpose within the prescriber's usual course of professional practice. A dentist's scope of practice is generally limited to the mouth, jaw, and associated structures. Prescribing for a systemic condition like high cholesterol is outside this scope, making the prescription invalid.

Question 5

A pharmacist receives an e-prescription for oxycodone 5 mg, quantity #40, from a Physician Assistant (PA). The prescription includes the PA's name, electronic signature, and individual DEA number, but omits the supervising physician's name.

  1. It is valid because the PA has their own DEA number, making supervising physician information unnecessary.
  2. The validity depends on state-specific laws regarding requirements for supervising physician information on a PA's prescription. (correct answer)
  3. It is invalid because PAs are federally prohibited from prescribing Schedule II medications under any circumstances.
  4. It is valid only if the pharmacist calls the supervising physician to convert it to a verbal order under the physician's DEA number.
Explanation: Federal law allows mid-level practitioners to prescribe controlled substances if authorized by their state. However, states have varying requirements regarding the inclusion of the supervising physician's name and/or DEA number on the prescription. Therefore, the validity of this prescription is contingent upon the laws of the specific state where the pharmacy is located.

Question 6

A pharmacy receives an electronically prescribed order for zolpidem (C-IV) for a new patient. The patient states they had a video consultation with a prescriber from a telehealth service. The prescriber is in another state and has never physically examined the patient.

  1. The prescription is invalid because the Ryan Haight Act requires at least one in-person medical evaluation to prescribe any controlled substance.
  2. The prescription is valid if the telehealth consultation was conducted using real-time, two-way audio-visual communication. (correct answer)
  3. The prescription is invalid because the prescriber is located out-of-state and cannot establish a valid relationship via telehealth.
  4. The prescription is valid only if the patient was referred to the telehealth service by a provider who has conducted an in-person exam.
Explanation: The Ryan Haight Act generally requires an in-person medical evaluation before prescribing controlled substances. However, a key exception exists for telemedicine practices where the consultation is conducted via a real-time, two-way, audio-visual communication system. This technology is considered a legitimate way to establish a prescriber-patient relationship for the purpose of prescribing.

Question 7

A pharmacist receives an otherwise valid written prescription for fentanyl patches, but the prescriber omitted the quantity to be dispensed. The pharmacist calls and speaks directly with the prescriber, who clarifies the intended quantity.

  1. The pharmacist may add the quantity to the prescription after documenting the conversation on the original hard copy.
  2. The pharmacist must require the prescriber to send a new, complete written or electronic prescription. (correct answer)
  3. The pharmacist may take the clarification as an emergency verbal order and dispense a limited supply.
  4. The pharmacist may dispense a minimal quantity, such as one box, and document this on the prescription.
Explanation: According to DEA policy, the essential elements of a C-II prescription that cannot be changed or added by a pharmacist (even after consultation) are the patient's name, the controlled substance prescribed (except for generic substitution), and the prescriber's signature. Many states and the DEA consider drug strength and quantity to be among these essential elements. Therefore, the pharmacist cannot add the quantity; a new, valid prescription is required.

Question 8

A physician, who is a regular patient at the pharmacy, presents a prescription for zolpidem (C-IV) that she has written for herself. The prescription is otherwise complete and appears to be for a legitimate medical purpose.

  1. The pharmacist can fill the prescription as there is no federal law specifically prohibiting self-prescribing of a C-IV substance.
  2. The pharmacist can fill the prescription for a non-refillable, 30-day supply only, due to its controlled status.
  3. The pharmacist can fill the prescription but must get verification from another physician to confirm the medical need.
  4. The pharmacist should not fill the prescription, as self-prescribing controlled substances is generally considered unprofessional conduct. (correct answer)
Explanation: While federal law may not explicitly forbid self-prescribing controlled substances, it is widely viewed as unprofessional conduct by medical boards and the American Medical Association. A valid prescription requires a legitimate patient-prescriber relationship, which is compromised in self-prescribing. Many states have specific regulations prohibiting it, making such a prescription invalid.

Question 9

A pharmacist receives a prescription from a veterinarian for 'Fido Smith' for phenobarbital 30 mg #60. The prescription includes the veterinarian's information but is missing the owner's full name and address.

  1. The prescription is valid as written, since the animal's name is sufficient for identification.
  2. The prescription is invalid until the pharmacist clarifies and documents the full name and address of the animal's owner. (correct answer)
  3. The prescription is invalid because phenobarbital requires the owner's DEA number in addition to the veterinarian's.
  4. The prescription can be filled, but the pharmacist must label it with both the animal's name and the species.
Explanation: For a veterinary prescription, especially for a controlled substance, federal law requires the prescription to contain the full name and address of the animal's owner, as well as the species of the animal. Dispensing the prescription without the owner's information would render it invalid.

Question 10

A pharmacist receives a new e-prescription for amlodipine 10mg with the directions 'Use as directed.' The patient has never taken this medication before and is unsure how the doctor wanted them to take it.

  1. The prescription is not valid for dispensing until the pharmacist contacts the prescriber to obtain specific directions for use. (correct answer)
  2. The prescription is valid, and the pharmacist should counsel the patient to follow the verbal instructions given by their doctor.
  3. The prescription is valid, and the pharmacist should use their professional judgment to apply standard dosing directions.
  4. The prescription is valid only because it is for a non-controlled substance; 'Use as directed' is only prohibited for controlled substances.
Explanation: Directions for use are a required component of a prescription. Vague instructions like 'use as directed' are considered ambiguous and unsafe, especially for a new medication, as they can lead to patient confusion and dosing errors. The pharmacist has a professional obligation to clarify the instructions with the prescriber before dispensing to ensure patient safety and create an accurate prescription label.

Question 11

A patient drops off a written prescription for hydrochlorothiazide. The prescription is on the provider's official pad and contains all required information, but the prescriber forgot to sign the signature line.

  1. The prescription is invalid until it is signed by the prescriber, and it cannot be dispensed. (correct answer)
  2. The pharmacist can fill the prescription after calling the prescriber's office to confirm it was authorized and documenting the call.
  3. The prescription is valid for a non-controlled substance as long as the prescriber's name is clearly printed on it.
  4. The pharmacist can sign the prescriber's name with permission after verbally confirming the order with the prescriber.
Explanation: A prescriber's signature is a fundamental legal requirement for a written prescription to be valid. An unsigned prescription is not a legal order. The pharmacist cannot 'fix' this by documenting a phone call or signing on behalf of the prescriber. The prescription must be properly signed by the prescriber, or a new valid prescription must be obtained.

Question 12

A pharmacist receives a new prescription for alprazolam 1 mg #60 with 2 refills for a patient from a dentist. The dentist's office states it is for the patient's 'dental anxiety.' The patient's profile shows no history of anxiety medications.

  1. The pharmacist must fill the prescription because treating dental anxiety is within a dentist's scope of practice.
  2. The pharmacist should refuse to fill the prescription as the quantity and refills are inconsistent with legitimate use for short-term dental procedures. (correct answer)
  3. The pharmacist should change the quantity to a more appropriate amount (e.g., #4 tablets) after consulting the dentist.
  4. The pharmacist must report the dentist to the state board of dentistry before taking any further action on the prescription.
Explanation: While prescribing a small quantity of an anxiolytic for use immediately prior to a procedure is within a dentist's scope, a prescription for 60 tablets with 2 refills is excessive and raises a red flag regarding legitimate medical purpose. Under their corresponding responsibility, the pharmacist should recognize this as potentially illegitimate and refuse to fill it.

Question 13

A nurse from a physician's office calls in a new prescription for metformin for a patient. The nurse states the physician has authorized the prescription, but the physician is currently with another patient and cannot speak on the phone.

  1. The prescription is invalid because only the prescriber can personally communicate a new prescription to the pharmacy.
  2. The prescription can be prepared, but is not valid for dispensing until the pharmacist receives a call back directly from the physician.
  3. The prescription is valid, as a nurse or other office staff can act as the prescriber's designated agent to communicate an order. (correct answer)
  4. The prescription is invalid unless the pharmacy has a written authorization on file designating that specific nurse as an agent.
Explanation: Prescribers may authorize an agent (such as a nurse or medical assistant) to communicate a prescription to a pharmacy on their behalf. This is permissible for non-controlled substances. The agent is not prescribing, but rather transmitting the prescriber's order. For controlled substances, the rules are more restrictive.

Question 14

An optometrist with therapeutic prescriptive authority writes a prescription for latanoprost ophthalmic solution for a patient with glaucoma. On the same prescription blank, they add a prescription for oral hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/325 for severe eye pain.

  1. The validity of the hydrocodone/acetaminophen prescription depends on state law defining the optometrist's authority to prescribe controlled substances. (correct answer)
  2. Both prescriptions are valid because pain management is within the scope of treating eye conditions.
  3. The latanoprost is valid, but the hydrocodone/acetaminophen is invalid because optometrists are federally prohibited from prescribing C-II or C-III narcotics.
  4. Both prescriptions are invalid because a controlled and non-controlled substance cannot be written on the same prescription blank.
Explanation: The authority of optometrists to prescribe medications, especially controlled substances, is determined by state law, not federal law. While all states grant some level of therapeutic authority, the scope varies significantly. Some states allow optometrists to prescribe a limited formulary of oral medications, including certain controlled substances for pain, while others do not. Therefore, the validity of the hydrocodone prescription is entirely dependent on the specific state's laws and regulations.

Question 15

On April 10th, a prescriber issues a patient three separate prescriptions for methylphenidate ER, each for a 30-day supply. Prescription #1 is dated April 10th. Prescription #2 is also dated April 10th with a note 'Do not fill before May 10th.' Prescription #3 has an issue date written as June 10th.

  1. All three prescriptions are valid as they represent a legitimate 90-day supply issued at one time.
  2. Only Prescription #1 is valid; federal law prohibits issuing multiple prescriptions for a C-II medication at the same time.
  3. Prescriptions #1 and #2 are valid, but Prescription #3 is an invalid post-dated prescription. (correct answer)
  4. All three prescriptions are invalid because a 'do not fill before' date cannot be used for a C-II medication.
Explanation: Federal law allows practitioners to issue multiple prescriptions for a Schedule II controlled substance on the same day, authorizing up to a 90-day supply. Each prescription must be dated with the actual date of issue. The prescriber may write 'do not fill until' instructions on subsequent prescriptions. A prescription dated with a future date (post-dated) is not a valid prescription.

Question 16

A pharmacist at a community pharmacy receives a written prescription for oxycodone/acetaminophen from a medical resident for a patient being discharged from a hospital. The prescription contains the hospital's DEA number followed by the resident's unique suffix.

  1. The prescription is invalid because a hospital's DEA number is only for medications dispensed and administered within the institution.
  2. The prescription is invalid because the resident must have their own individual DEA registration to prescribe controlled substances.
  3. The prescription is valid, as residents are authorized to use their hospital's DEA registration with an assigned internal code. (correct answer)
  4. The prescription is valid only if the attending physician who supervised the resident co-signs the prescription.
Explanation: Federal regulations (21 CFR § 1301.22(c)) allow institutional practitioners (like hospitals) to permit unlicensed interns, residents, or foreign-trained physicians to dispense and prescribe controlled substances under the hospital's DEA registration. The practitioner must be assigned a specific internal code as a suffix to the hospital's DEA number.

Question 17

A patient on vacation from another state presents a valid, written prescription for morphine sulfate ER from a prescriber licensed and practicing in their home state. The prescription meets all federal requirements. The pharmacist is not familiar with the prescriber.

  1. The pharmacist cannot fill the prescription because federal law requires C-II prescriptions to be filled only in the state where they were written.
  2. The pharmacist may fill the prescription after exercising due diligence to verify the prescriber's credentials and the prescription's legitimacy. (correct answer)
  3. The pharmacist can only dispense a 72-hour emergency supply until the prescription's validity can be confirmed with the out-of-state board.
  4. The pharmacist must refuse to fill the prescription unless the patient can provide a medical record demonstrating the need for the medication.
Explanation: There is no federal prohibition on filling an out-of-state C-II prescription. While state laws may vary, it is generally permissible if the prescription is valid and the pharmacist fulfills their corresponding responsibility. This includes verifying the prescriber is licensed and registered with the DEA and ensuring the prescription is for a legitimate medical purpose. It does not require a call to the out-of-state board or demand for medical records.

Question 18

A pharmacist receives an e-prescription for phentermine (C-IV) from an out-of-state 'weight-loss clinic.' Upon calling the patient for counseling, the patient confirms they only filled out an online health questionnaire and never had a real-time conversation with the prescriber.

  1. The prescription is invalid as it was not issued for a legitimate medical purpose pursuant to a valid patient-prescriber relationship. (correct answer)
  2. The prescription is valid as long as the prescriber is licensed and the e-prescription passes all software security checks.
  3. The prescription is valid because the Ryan Haight Act's in-person exam requirement does not apply to C-IV medications.
  4. The pharmacist must fill the prescription to avoid patient abandonment, but should then report the clinic to the DEA.
Explanation: The Ryan Haight Act requires that the prescribing of a controlled substance be preceded by at least one in-person medical evaluation of the patient (with some exceptions, like specific telemedicine encounters). A prescription based solely on an online questionnaire does not establish a valid patient-prescriber relationship, rendering the prescription illegitimate and invalid. The pharmacist's corresponding responsibility requires them to refuse to fill it.

Question 19

A patient who is a regular customer presents a new, validly written paper prescription for lisinopril. The pharmacist notices that the patient's address is not written on the prescription form.

  1. The pharmacist must return the prescription to the patient to have the prescriber add the address before it can be filled.
  2. The prescription is invalid because the patient address is a mandatory federal requirement for all new prescriptions.
  3. The pharmacist can fill the prescription, as the patient's address can be readily obtained from pharmacy records and added. (correct answer)
  4. The pharmacist can dispense the medication but must document the reason for the missing address on the back of the prescription.
Explanation: Under federal law (21 CFR § 1306.05), the patient's full address is a required element on prescriptions for controlled substances. For non-controlled substances, state laws govern, and most states permit the pharmacist to add or confirm the address if it is missing, especially if the patient is established and the information is available in the pharmacy's records.

Question 20

A local dermatology clinic sends a written prescription to a community pharmacy for 'Compounded Magic Mouthwash, 1000 mL. For office use.' The prescription is signed by a physician at the clinic.

  1. The prescription is valid, but the pharmacy must label it with 'For Office Use Only by a Practitioner'.
  2. The prescription is invalid for a compounded product but would be valid for a commercially available legend drug.
  3. The prescription is valid if the physician provides the DEA number for the clinic, even if the medication is not a controlled substance.
  4. The prescription is invalid; pharmacies should sell medications for office use to a clinic via an invoice or other direct sale record. (correct answer)
Explanation: A prescription is a patient-specific order. Medications intended for administration in a prescriber's office (office use) cannot be dispensed pursuant to a prescription. The proper mechanism for a pharmacy to provide drugs to a practitioner for office use is through a direct sale documented by an invoice, not a prescription.