All questions
Question 1
A desert plant population has two inherited leaf traits: waxy leaves and non-waxy leaves. The environment stayed dry with the same low rainfall for the entire growing season. Researchers counted how many plants produced at least 10 seeds.
Data: Out of 80 waxy-leaf plants, 52 produced at least 10 seeds. Out of 80 non-waxy-leaf plants, 19 produced at least 10 seeds.
Which claim about traits and reproduction is best supported by the evidence?
- Non-waxy leaves are the best trait because plants with that trait are more noticeable.
- Waxy leaves are associated with higher reproduction (more plants reaching at least 10 seeds) in this dry environment. (correct answer)
- Because the environment was dry, all plants had the same reproduction regardless of leaf trait.
- Waxy leaves guarantee that every plant will produce at least 10 seeds.
Explanation: The core skill in life science is understanding how inherited traits can improve an organism's reproduction in specific environments. Some traits affect survival and reproduction by aiding resource retention, like waxy leaves in desert plants reducing water loss in dry conditions compared to non-waxy leaves. Evidence links traits to outcomes by comparing the number of plants producing seeds between groups, with waxy-leaf plants showing higher success (52 out of 80) than non-waxy (19 out of 80). To check this, compare the proportions achieving reproductive thresholds under identical environmental stresses. A common misconception is that advantageous traits ensure success for every individual, but not all waxy-leaf plants succeeded. Over time, reproduction differences lead to more waxy-leaf offspring, altering the population's trait distribution. This change in population composition reflects adaptation to dry environments through natural selection.
Question 2
In a forest with the same type of beetle-eating birds each season, a beetle population has two inherited shell-color traits: green and brown. After 10 days, researchers recorded survival.
Data: Out of 200 green beetles, 110 survived. Out of 200 brown beetles, 150 survived.
Which trait is associated with higher survival in this environment, based on the evidence?
- Green shell color, because green is a brighter color.
- Brown shell color, because a larger number survived in the brown group under the same conditions. (correct answer)
- Green shell color, because inherited traits guarantee success.
- Neither trait matters; survival is only controlled by the forest and not by traits.
Explanation: The core skill in life science is understanding how inherited traits can improve an organism's survival in specific environments. Some traits affect survival by better matching the surroundings, like brown shell color in beetles offering camouflage in forests compared to green. Evidence links traits to outcomes through survival counts, with brown beetles at 150 out of 200 surviving versus 110 out of 200 green ones. To check this, compare absolute numbers or percentages in the same environment to identify the associated trait. A common misconception is that brighter colors always aid survival, but data show context matters. Over time, higher survival of brown beetles leads to more offspring with that trait, changing the population's makeup. This gradual shift demonstrates how advantageous traits become more common through generations.
Question 3
A population of rabbits has two inherited ear-length traits: long ears and short ears. The environment stayed the same (same temperature range and same predators) for 3 months. Researchers recorded how many rabbits survived.
Data: Out of 60 long-eared rabbits, 39 survived. Out of 60 short-eared rabbits, 41 survived.
Which statement is supported by the evidence about traits and survival?
- Long ears are required for survival, because the long-eared group had many survivors.
- Short ears are associated with slightly higher survival than long ears under these conditions. (correct answer)
- Long ears are associated with higher survival because long ears look more impressive.
- The data prove ear length does not affect survival in any environment.
Explanation: The core skill in life science is understanding how inherited traits can improve an organism's survival in specific environments. Some traits affect survival by influencing factors like heat regulation, with short ears in rabbits providing a slight edge in stable conditions over long ears. Evidence links traits to outcomes by comparing survival, showing short-eared rabbits at 41 out of 60 versus 39 out of 60 long-eared. To check this, verify the slight difference in rates under unchanged conditions. A common misconception is that larger features always improve survival, but evidence can show otherwise. Over time, better survival of short-eared rabbits increases their proportion in the population through reproduction. This population change highlights natural selection's role in trait prevalence.
Question 4
Two populations of the same snail species live in separate tanks with the same water temperature and the same fish predator species. Each tank starts with 100 snails with inherited shell traits: thick shells and thin shells.
Tank 1 (high calcium): Thick-shell snails: 68 survived; Thin-shell snails: 52 survived.
Tank 2 (low calcium): Thick-shell snails: 40 survived; Thin-shell snails: 42 survived.
Which statement comparing outcomes is supported by the evidence?
- Thick shells guarantee higher survival in every environment because shell thickness is inherited.
- Thick shells are associated with higher survival in the high-calcium tank, but not in the low-calcium tank, showing that a trait's effect can depend on conditions. (correct answer)
- Thin shells are always best because they are lighter.
- Because predators were the same in both tanks, shell traits cannot be linked to survival differences.
Explanation: The core skill in life science is understanding how inherited traits can improve an organism's survival in specific environments. Some traits affect survival differently based on conditions, like thick shells in snails aiding in high-calcium tanks but not low-calcium ones compared to thin shells. Evidence links traits to outcomes by comparing survival across environments, showing context dependency (e.g., thick better in high calcium, similar in low). To check this, analyze data per condition to see varying trait effects. A common misconception is that traits have fixed benefits everywhere, but evidence shows environmental influence. Over time, survival differences in each tank would shift population traits accordingly. This variable composition highlights how adaptation depends on specific conditions over generations.
Question 5
In a grassland with the same hawk predators each year, a population of mice has two inherited coat-color traits: light tan and dark brown. After 1 month, researchers recorded survival.
Data: Out of 100 light tan mice, 62 survived. Out of 100 dark brown mice, 28 survived.
Which statement is supported by the evidence about traits and survival in this environment?
- All mice survived or died mainly because hawks were present, so coat color does not matter.
- Dark brown coat color guarantees survival because it is an inherited trait.
- Light tan coat color is associated with higher survival than dark brown coat color in this grassland. (correct answer)
- The mice with dark brown coats survived more because they were stronger.
Explanation: The core skill in life science is understanding how inherited traits can improve an organism's survival in specific environments. Some traits affect survival by providing advantages like better camouflage against predators, as seen in mice with light tan coats blending into grasslands compared to dark brown ones. Evidence links traits to outcomes by comparing survival rates between groups with different traits under the same conditions, showing higher survival for light tan mice (62 out of 100) versus dark brown (28 out of 100). To check this, calculate the percentage survived for each trait and see which is higher in the given environment. A common misconception is that a trait guarantees survival for all individuals, but data show variation even within advantageous trait groups. Over time, survival differences mean more light tan mice reproduce, increasing that trait in the population. This shift in population composition demonstrates natural selection favoring adaptive traits.
Question 6
In a coastal bird population, individuals have different inherited beak shapes: narrow beaks and thick beaks. The environment stayed the same for one breeding season (same available foods and same weather). Data collected: Narrow beaks—120 adults started the season, 30 produced at least 1 chick. Thick beaks—120 adults started the season, 60 produced at least 1 chick. Which trait is associated with higher reproduction based on the evidence?
- Thick beaks, because a higher number of thick-beaked adults produced chicks under the same conditions. (correct answer)
- Neither beak shape is related to reproduction because reproduction depends only on luck, not inherited traits.
- Narrow beaks, because all individuals that reproduce must have the same trait, so variation is not needed.
- Narrow beaks, because narrow beaks look more pointed and pointed traits lead to more reproduction.
Explanation: This question examines how traits can affect reproductive success in populations. Some inherited traits, like beak shape in birds, can influence reproduction rates in a given environment. Evidence comes from comparing reproductive outcomes between groups—here, 25% of narrow-beaked birds reproduced (30/120) while 50% of thick-beaked birds reproduced (60/120) under identical conditions. To verify the answer, calculate what fraction of each group successfully reproduced and compare. A misconception is thinking that physical appearance alone (like "pointed" beaks) determines success without considering actual data. When certain traits lead to higher reproduction, those traits tend to increase in frequency over generations, gradually shifting the population's characteristics.
Question 7
A population of insects shows two inherited traits for antenna length: long antennae and short antennae. The environment stayed the same for 3 generations (same habitat, same predators, same food). Reproduction data per generation (average offspring per adult): Gen 1—Long 6, Short 6; Gen 2—Long 6, Short 3; Gen 3—Long 6, Short 3. Which statement is supported by this evidence?
- No trait is linked to reproduction because the data are averages and averages cannot be used as evidence.
- Short antennae are associated with higher reproduction because they are shorter and shorter traits are always more efficient.
- Long antennae will appear in every single insect in the next generation because the trait caused higher reproduction.
- Long antennae are associated with higher reproduction in generations 2 and 3 because adults with long antennae had more offspring per adult under the same conditions. (correct answer)
Explanation: This question examines multigenerational data to identify trait-reproduction relationships. Some inherited traits consistently affect reproductive success across generations, as shown by comparing offspring production. The evidence shows long-antennae insects maintained 6 offspring per adult across all generations, while short-antennae insects dropped from 6 to 3 offspring per adult in generations 2 and 3. To verify patterns, examine whether differences persist across multiple generations under constant conditions. A misconception is thinking successful traits will immediately dominate or that average data cannot serve as evidence. Over generations, traits associated with higher reproduction gradually increase in frequency, as these individuals contribute more offspring, slowly shifting the population's trait distribution.
Question 8
A plant population includes individuals with two inherited traits for leaf surface: waxy leaves and non-waxy leaves. The environment stayed consistent for 10 weeks (same sunlight, same soil type, same watering schedule, same herbivores). Survival data: Waxy leaves—200 seedlings started, 140 survived. Non-waxy leaves—200 seedlings started, 80 survived. Which evidence best links a trait to survival?
- Waxy leaves are a good trait because wax is useful, so waxy plants must survive more.
- The environment stayed consistent, so traits cannot be linked to survival differences.
- The plants with waxy leaves had a higher survival fraction (140/200) than plants with non-waxy leaves (80/200) under the same conditions. (correct answer)
- Non-waxy leaves survived less because smaller plants always die first, regardless of leaf trait.
Explanation: This question focuses on using quantitative evidence to link traits to survival outcomes. Some traits, like waxy leaf surfaces, can affect plant survival in certain environments. Scientists compare survival rates using fractions or percentages—here, 70% of waxy-leaved plants survived (140/200) versus 40% of non-waxy plants (80/200) under identical conditions. To verify conclusions, calculate survival fractions and ensure environmental conditions were controlled. A common error is making assumptions about traits being "good" without examining actual data or attributing differences to unrelated factors like plant size. When traits consistently show different survival rates, those with advantages tend to increase in the population over multiple generations, demonstrating natural selection.
Question 9
A fish population has two inherited traits for body pattern: striped and plain. The river conditions were consistent for 12 weeks (same water clarity, same predators, same temperature). Start: 100 striped and 100 plain fish. End: 70 striped and 40 plain fish. Which prediction about survival is supported if the same conditions continue for another 12 weeks?
- Both traits will have exactly the same survival because survival depends only on the river, not traits.
- Striped fish are likely to have a higher survival rate than plain fish under the same conditions because striped fish had higher survival in the first 12 weeks. (correct answer)
- Plain fish will have higher survival because the model must alternate outcomes each time period.
- Plain fish will all die because the trait caused lower survival in the first 12 weeks.
Explanation: This question tests prediction-making based on observed trait-survival relationships. Some inherited traits affect survival rates, and these patterns often continue under consistent conditions. The evidence shows 70% of striped fish survived (70/100) compared to 40% of plain fish (40/100) over 12 weeks. To make predictions, assume similar survival rates will continue if conditions remain unchanged—striped fish will likely maintain higher survival. A misconception is thinking all individuals with disadvantageous traits will die or that outcomes must alternate between periods. Over generations, traits associated with higher survival become more common, but both trait variations typically persist in populations, with proportions shifting based on differential survival rates.
Question 10
In a snail population, individuals have different inherited shell traits: thick shells and thin shells. The shoreline conditions were consistent for 4 months (same wave strength, same crab predators, same salinity). Start: 250 thick-shelled and 250 thin-shelled snails. End: 200 thick-shelled and 100 thin-shelled snails. A student makes a claim: "Thick shells caused every thick-shelled snail to survive." Which evaluation is best supported by the evidence?
- The claim cannot be evaluated using the data because trait labels do not provide any evidence about survival.
- The claim is not supported because thick shells are associated with higher survival, but the data show that not all thick-shelled snails survived. (correct answer)
- The claim is supported because thick shells had more survivors, so the trait guarantees survival.
- The claim is supported because thin shells are a harmful trait, and harmful traits always disappear immediately.
Explanation: This question tests understanding of evidence interpretation and avoiding overgeneralization about traits. Some traits increase survival chances, but no trait guarantees 100% survival for all individuals. The data show 80% of thick-shelled snails survived (200/250) versus 40% of thin-shelled snails (100/250), indicating thick shells are associated with higher survival. To evaluate claims, check if the data support absolute statements—since 50 thick-shelled snails died, the trait doesn't guarantee survival. A misconception is confusing "higher survival rate" with "guaranteed survival" or thinking disadvantageous traits disappear immediately. Over time, advantageous traits become more common through differential survival, but populations maintain variation as no trait ensures complete success.
Question 11
Two inherited traits occur in a rabbit population: long ears and short ears. The environment remained the same for one winter (same snowfall, same food supply, same predators). Data: Long ears—300 rabbits at start, 120 survived. Short ears—300 rabbits at start, 180 survived. Which statement is supported by the evidence?
- Ear length does not matter because some of both types survived, so the trait cannot affect survival.
- Short ears guarantee survival because they had the higher number of survivors.
- Long ears are associated with higher survival because long ears are larger and survival equals size.
- Short ears are associated with higher survival in this winter environment because more short-eared rabbits survived out of the same starting number. (correct answer)
Explanation: This question examines how physical traits can influence survival in specific environments. Some inherited traits, like ear length in rabbits, affect survival rates under certain conditions. Evidence shows 40% of long-eared rabbits survived winter (120/300) while 60% of short-eared rabbits survived (180/300), suggesting short ears provide a survival advantage. To verify conclusions, calculate survival percentages and compare them directly. A misconception is assuming larger traits always mean better survival or that having more survivors guarantees survival for all individuals with that trait. Over time, traits that improve survival in the current environment become more common, gradually changing the population's characteristics through differential survival.
Question 12
A population of beetles has two inherited shell-color traits: green shells and brown shells. The environment stayed the same for 6 months (same soil color, same predators, same rainfall). At the start, there were 200 green and 200 brown beetles. After 6 months, 80 green and 160 brown beetles were alive. Based on this evidence, which statement about trait and survival is supported?
- Brown shell color is associated with higher survival in this environment because a larger fraction of brown beetles remained alive. (correct answer)
- Green shell color guarantees survival because some green beetles were still alive after 6 months.
- Survival was caused only by the environment, so shell color traits did not affect survival outcomes.
- The beetles that were strongest survived, so shell color is not linked to survival.
Explanation: This question tests understanding of how inherited traits can affect survival in a population. Some traits, like shell color in beetles, can influence how well organisms survive in their environment. Scientists gather evidence by comparing survival rates between groups with different traits under the same conditions—here, 40% of green beetles survived (80/200) while 80% of brown beetles survived (160/200). To check your answer, calculate the survival fraction for each trait and compare them. A common misconception is that survival guarantees or that all survivors must have the same trait, but variation persists even when one trait has higher survival. Over time, traits associated with higher survival tend to become more common in populations, gradually changing the population's composition.
Question 13
A lizard population includes individuals with two inherited traits for leg length: long legs and short legs. The environment stayed consistent for 5 months (same temperature range, same habitat structure, same predators). Reproductive outcome data: Long legs—90 adults, 36 produced offspring. Short legs—90 adults, 18 produced offspring. Which statement about traits and reproduction is supported by the evidence?
- Long legs are associated with higher reproduction because a greater fraction of long-legged adults produced offspring under the same conditions. (correct answer)
- Short legs are associated with higher reproduction because short legs require less energy, so they must reproduce more.
- All long-legged lizards reproduced because long legs are a successful trait.
- Reproduction depends only on the season, so inherited traits cannot be linked to reproductive outcomes.
Explanation: This question focuses on how traits can affect reproductive success in populations. Some inherited traits influence reproduction rates, as shown when comparing offspring production between groups. The data reveal 40% of long-legged lizards reproduced (36/90) versus 20% of short-legged lizards (18/90) under identical conditions. To verify answers, calculate the fraction of each group that successfully reproduced. A common error is making assumptions about energy efficiency without data or thinking all individuals with a "successful" trait must reproduce. Over generations, traits associated with higher reproduction tend to increase in frequency, as individuals with these traits contribute more offspring to future generations, gradually shifting population characteristics.
Question 14
A bird population has two inherited beak-shape traits: narrow beaks and deep beaks. For one year, the environment stayed consistent (same types of seeds available, same drought level, same predators). Reproductive success was measured by the average number of chicks per pair.
Which prediction about reproduction is supported by the evidence?
- Pairs with deep beaks will, on average, produce more chicks than pairs with narrow beaks in the same environment. (correct answer)
- Pairs with narrow beaks will always produce more chicks because smaller traits reproduce faster.
- Beak shape cannot be linked to reproduction because only short-term survival counts as evidence.
- If one deep-beak pair produced 0 chicks, then deep beaks do not affect reproduction at all.
Explanation: This question examines how traits affect reproductive success, measured here as average chicks per breeding pair. Some traits, like beak shape in birds, can influence feeding efficiency and thus the ability to raise offspring successfully. Evidence for trait-reproduction links comes from comparing average reproductive output between groups—deep-beak pairs produced more chicks on average than narrow-beak pairs under the same conditions. To evaluate predictions, look for statements about averages or trends rather than absolutes, since individual variation always exists within trait groups. A common misconception is thinking one counterexample (like one unsuccessful deep-beak pair) negates the overall pattern, when scientists focus on average differences between groups. Over time, traits associated with higher reproductive success become more common because those individuals contribute more offspring to future generations.
Question 15
A group of mice lives in a grassy field that stays the same across seasons (same plant cover, same predators, same weather pattern). The mice have two inherited fur-color traits: brown fur or white fur. After 6 months, the number of offspring produced by each group was counted.
Which trait is associated with higher reproduction based on the evidence?
- Brown fur, because mice with brown fur produced more total offspring in the same environment. (correct answer)
- White fur, because the model means every white-fur mouse will produce more offspring than every brown-fur mouse.
- White fur, because fur color is only an appearance and cannot affect reproduction.
- Either fur color, because no variation in traits is needed for reproduction differences.
Explanation: This question examines how traits affect reproduction, another key component of survival and population change. Some traits can influence not just survival but also reproductive success—the number of offspring an organism produces. Evidence for linking traits to reproduction comes from comparing offspring counts between groups with different traits in the same environment, as shown here where brown-fur mice produced more offspring than white-fur mice. To evaluate this evidence, look at the total or average offspring produced by each trait group under identical conditions. A misconception is thinking appearance traits like fur color cannot affect reproduction, but these traits can influence mate selection, energy efficiency, or survival to reproductive age. When certain traits lead to more offspring, those traits become more common in future generations, gradually changing the population's composition.
Question 16
A population of insects has two inherited traits for body size: large and small. The environment stayed constant (same pesticide exposure level and same food supply) for 2 weeks. Researchers recorded survival.
Data: Out of 150 large insects, 45 survived. Out of 150 small insects, 75 survived.
Which statement about survival is supported by the evidence?
- Large insects survived more because survival mainly depends on being bigger.
- Small insects are associated with higher survival than large insects under these constant conditions. (correct answer)
- Because both groups were exposed to pesticide, traits do not affect survival.
- The data show that size determines survival for every individual insect.
Explanation: The core skill in life science is understanding how inherited traits can improve an organism's survival in specific environments. Some traits affect survival by influencing resistance or evasion, like small body size in insects offering advantages under pesticide exposure compared to large size. Evidence links traits to outcomes through survival data, showing small insects at 75 out of 150 versus 45 out of 150 large ones. To check this, calculate and compare survival proportions in constant conditions. A common misconception is that larger size always enhances survival, but context like pesticides can reverse this. Over time, higher survival of small insects leads to more small offspring, altering population traits. This change demonstrates natural selection favoring adaptive sizes in challenging environments.
Question 17
A student reads the following study about lizards living on the same rocky hillside for 2 months (same temperature pattern and same predators).
Inherited traits: rough toe pads vs smooth toe pads.
Data: Out of 90 rough-toe-pad lizards, 63 survived. Out of 90 smooth-toe-pad lizards, 36 survived.
Which claim about traits and survival is incorrect based on the evidence?
- Some inherited traits can increase survival in a particular environment, as shown by the different survival numbers.
- The rough-toe-pad trait increased survival for every single lizard in the rough-toe-pad group. (correct answer)
- The evidence compares groups under the same conditions, which helps link the trait to survival outcomes.
- Rough toe pads are associated with higher survival than smooth toe pads on this rocky hillside.
Explanation: The core skill in life science is understanding how inherited traits can improve an organism's survival in specific environments. Some traits affect survival by providing physical advantages, such as rough toe pads in lizards aiding grip on rocky hillsides compared to smooth ones. Evidence links traits to outcomes by comparing group survival, but claims must avoid overgeneralizing, as not every rough-toe-pad lizard survived (63 out of 90 versus 36 out of 90). To check this, evaluate statements against data for accuracy, identifying incorrect absolutes like guarantees for every individual. A common misconception is that group advantages mean universal success, but variation exists within groups. Over time, survival differences favor rough toe pads, increasing their frequency in the population. This shift in composition underscores how evidence-based claims reveal evolutionary processes.
Question 18
In the same desert habitat for 3 months (same temperature range and same predators), a lizard population has two inherited traits: light-colored skin and dark-colored skin. At the start, there are 100 light-skin lizards and 100 dark-skin lizards. After 3 months, 70 light-skin lizards and 35 dark-skin lizards remain. Which statement is supported by the evidence?
- Light-colored skin is associated with higher survival in this desert habitat. (correct answer)
- Dark-colored skin is associated with higher survival because darker colors are stronger.
- The habitat alone caused survival outcomes, so inherited traits cannot affect survival.
- Because 35 dark-skin lizards survived, the dark-skin trait guarantees survival.
Explanation: The core skill is drawing supported conclusions from survival data about how traits influence outcomes in a habitat. Some traits affect survival by providing camouflage, such as light-colored skin blending with desert sands to avoid predators. Evidence links traits to outcomes through population changes, with 70% of light-skin lizards surviving versus 35% of dark-skin ones. A checking strategy is to compute survival rates for each trait and compare them to see which is higher in the given conditions. A common misconception is that higher survival for a trait guarantees no deaths, but it only boosts overall likelihood. Survival differences result in more individuals with light skin reproducing over time. This changes the population's trait distribution, increasing advantageous features in subsequent generations.
Question 19
A farmer planted two inherited varieties of the same crop in the same field with the same watering schedule and soil type for the entire season: Variety R (disease-resistant) and Variety N (not disease-resistant). A plant is counted as successful if it produces at least 20 seeds.
Data: Out of 100 Variety R plants, 70 produced at least 20 seeds. Out of 100 Variety N plants, 40 produced at least 20 seeds.
Which prediction about survival or reproduction is supported by the evidence if the same disease remains present next season?
- Both varieties will produce the same number of seeds because the field conditions are the only cause of reproduction.
- Variety R will likely have a higher proportion of plants producing at least 20 seeds than Variety N under the same disease conditions. (correct answer)
- All Variety R plants will produce at least 20 seeds because disease resistance guarantees reproduction.
- Variety N will produce more seeds because it looks healthier at the start of the season.
Explanation: The core skill in life science is understanding how inherited traits can improve an organism's reproduction in specific environments. Some traits affect survival and reproduction by conferring resistance, like disease-resistant varieties in crops yielding more seeds than non-resistant ones in diseased fields. Evidence links traits to outcomes by comparing seed production, predicting Variety R's higher success (70 out of 100) over Variety N (40 out of 100) if conditions persist. To check this, project based on proportions under similar future scenarios. A common misconception is that traits guarantee outcomes for all, but not every resistant plant succeeded. Over time, better reproduction of resistant plants increases their presence in populations. This shift illustrates how traits drive evolutionary changes in agriculture.
Question 20
A frog population includes individuals with two inherited skin traits: rough skin and smooth skin. The pond conditions were consistent for 9 weeks (same water temperature, same predator species, same plant cover). Survival data: Rough skin—160 frogs at start, 64 survived. Smooth skin—160 frogs at start, 96 survived. Which statement about survival is supported by the evidence?
- Both traits have the same survival because frogs live in the same pond, so trait differences cannot affect outcomes.
- Smooth skin is associated with higher survival because more smooth-skinned frogs survived from the same starting number under the same conditions. (correct answer)
- Rough skin is associated with higher survival because rough skin looks tougher and toughness determines survival.
- Smooth skin guarantees survival because it had the higher number of survivors.
Explanation: This question tests understanding of how traits affect survival in aquatic environments. Some inherited traits, like skin texture in frogs, can influence survival rates in specific habitats. The evidence shows 40% of rough-skinned frogs survived (64/160) while 60% of smooth-skinned frogs survived (96/160) under identical pond conditions. To verify conclusions, calculate survival percentages for each trait and compare them directly. A common error is judging traits by appearance ("tougher-looking") rather than actual survival data or thinking environmental uniformity prevents trait-based differences. Over time, traits with survival advantages become more prevalent in populations, as individuals with these traits are more likely to survive and reproduce, gradually altering the population's composition.