All questions
Question 1
Which step in a plant model best shows water returning to nonliving parts?
- Root absorbs water from soil
- Leaf releases water to air (correct answer)
- Stem moves water to leaves
- Leaf uses water to make sugar
Explanation: Water returns to the nonliving environment when leaves release it into the air as vapor, since air is nonliving. The root absorbing water moves water into the living plant instead of returning it. The leaf using water to make sugar keeps water in the living system, so transpiration is the best answer.
Question 2
In a forest model, a fungus decays a fallen log. Which path best traces carbon?
- log → fungus → air and soil (correct answer)
- air → fungus → log → soil
- soil → log → fungus → air
- log → soil → fungus → air
Explanation: A fungus is a decomposer that takes in carbon directly from the fallen log. As it breaks down the log, carbon moves into the fungus and is released as carbon dioxide into the air and as organic matter into the soil. The tempting wrong path puts soil before fungus, but the fungus must consume the log before carbon can enter the soil.
Question 3
A grassland model shows carbon in air. Which arrow best moves it into a producer?
- energy from sunlight → grass
- nutrients from soil → grass
- carbon dioxide in air → grass (correct answer)
- oxygen gas from air → grass
Explanation: Carbon in the air is in the form of carbon dioxide gas, and producers like grass take it in and use it to build sugars during photosynthesis. Energy from sunlight powers that process but does not itself move carbon into the grass, so it is not the arrow that moves carbon.
Question 4
Rabbit waste decays in a model. Which path best traces nitrogen?
- waste → soil → plant roots (correct answer)
- waste → air → plant roots
- nitrogen gas → waste → soil
- plant roots → waste → soil
Explanation: Rabbit waste contains nitrogen compounds. Decomposers in soil break the waste down into forms like nitrates, which plant roots absorb. The tempting wrong path is waste → air → plant roots because nitrogen gas is in air, but roots take up nitrogen from soil, not from air.
Question 5
In a pond model, which arrow best traces matter from a producer to the air?
- fish → oxygen gas
- oxygen gas → algae
- sunlight → algae
- algae → oxygen gas (correct answer)
Explanation: Algae are producers that make food through photosynthesis and release oxygen gas as a byproduct. The arrow from algae to oxygen gas shows matter moving from the producer into the air. The tempting reverse arrow, oxygen gas to algae, shows matter moving from the air into the producer, which is the wrong direction.
Question 6
Use the ecosystem model below. Arrows show matter moving and labels identify the matter: CO2 in air → shrub; shrub matter → rabbit → hawk; dead organisms/waste → decomposers → nutrients in soil → shrub; decomposers → CO2 in air. The model shows matter cycling through ecosystems.
Which statement is supported by the model as evidence that matter cycles (rather than moving one-way and stopping)?
- Matter moves from shrub to rabbit to hawk, so it must be used up at the top consumer.
- Matter can return to nonliving parts of the ecosystem (air and soil) and later become part of plants again. (correct answer)
- Matter is created when shrubs grow larger, because their mass increases.
- Because the model is a drawing, the arrows show where animals prefer to travel, not where matter moves.
Explanation: The core skill is using models to trace matter and support claims about cycling over one-way flow. Matter moves through ecosystems in loops, returning to nonliving parts for reuse. Models illustrate this with arrows showing returns to air and soil, evidencing cycles. A strategy is to look for evidence against use-up or creation, confirming recirculation. Misconception: matter is created by growth, but it's incorporated from the environment. Tracing matter proves sustainable recycling. It explains ecosystem functioning by showing perpetual matter availability for life.
Question 7
Use the ecosystem model below to trace matter. The arrows show matter moving between living and nonliving parts of the ecosystem, and the labels name the matter being moved. This model provides evidence that matter cycles through ecosystems.
Which path correctly traces the movement of the same matter through both the environment and organisms?
Model (described): CO2 in air → (photosynthesis) grass → rabbit → fox → decomposers → CO2 in air; and dead organisms/waste → decomposers → nutrients in soil → grass.
- CO2 in air → grass → rabbit → fox → decomposers → CO2 in air (correct answer)
- Grass → rabbit → fox → energy in air → CO2 in air
- Nutrients in soil → decomposers → dead organisms/waste → rabbit
- CO2 in air → grass → rabbit → fox, and then the matter disappears
Explanation: The core skill in life science is tracing how matter moves and cycles through ecosystems to understand sustainability. Matter moves through ecosystems by transferring from nonliving components like air and soil into producers, then to consumers, and back via decomposers. Models show this cycling with arrows indicating paths, such as CO2 from air entering plants, moving to animals, and returning through decomposition. To check understanding, follow the arrows in a model to ensure matter loops back without disappearing or being created anew. A common misconception is that matter vanishes after consumption, but it actually transforms and recirculates. Tracing matter reveals how ecosystems recycle resources efficiently. This process explains why ecosystems can support diverse life forms over time without depleting matter.
Question 8
Ecosystem model (described): In a grassland, grass (living) takes in matter from soil (nonliving) and air (nonliving). A mouse (living) eats grass seeds and leaves. A snake (living) eats mice. A hawk (living) eats snakes. Decomposers (living) break down dead matter from grass, mice, snakes, and hawks. Matter from decomposers becomes part of the soil. Arrows are labeled with the matter moving along each arrow. The model states: Matter cycles through ecosystems.
What evidence from the ecosystem model best shows that matter cycles (moves and can return) through the ecosystem?
- There is an arrow from grass to mouse labeled grass matter
- There are arrows showing matter moving from decomposers to soil and from soil to grass, linking living and nonliving parts (correct answer)
- The hawk is at the top of the food chain, so matter must stop moving when it reaches the hawk
- The arrows show how much energy each organism has, so they do not provide evidence about matter movement
Explanation: The core skill in tracing matter in ecosystems is identifying evidence that demonstrates matter's cyclic movement. Matter moves through ecosystems from nonliving sources to producers, consumers, and back through decomposers to the environment. Models show cycling with interconnected arrows, like from soil to grass and decomposers back to soil, illustrating return paths. A checking strategy is to look for arrows linking living and nonliving parts to confirm cycling. People often misconceive that matter stops at top predators, but it continues via decomposition. Tracing matter helps explain nutrient availability for ongoing growth. In general, this cycling underpins ecosystem stability and functioning.
Question 9
Ecosystem model (described): A forest ecosystem model shows: tree (living) caterpillar (living) bird (living). Dead leaves and dead animals become dead matter (nonliving). Decomposers (living) take in dead matter. Matter from decomposers becomes part of the soil (nonliving). The tree takes in matter from the soil and from the air (nonliving). Arrows are labeled with the type of matter moving (tree matter, caterpillar matter, bird matter, dead matter, decomposer matter, soil matter, air matter). The model states: Matter cycles through ecosystems.
A student makes four claims about the model. Which claim about matter is incorrect?
- Matter can move from dead organisms to decomposers and then into the soil, as shown by the arrows
- Once matter moves into the bird, it turns into energy, so that matter no longer exists in the ecosystem (correct answer)
- The arrows show that matter can move from the tree to the caterpillar and from the caterpillar to the bird
- Some matter moves from the environment (soil and air) into the tree, as shown by labeled arrows
Explanation: The core skill in tracing matter in ecosystems is evaluating claims about matter movement using model evidence. Matter moves through ecosystems from nonliving elements like soil and air into living organisms and back via decomposition. Models depict cycling through arrows showing paths like from dead matter to decomposers and soil, emphasizing return flows. To check, compare each claim to the model's labeled arrows and identify any contradiction with cycling. A misconception is that matter converts to energy and disappears, but matter remains in different forms. Tracing matter clarifies how ecosystems recycle resources efficiently. Ultimately, this explains the sustained functioning of ecosystems over time.
Question 10
Ecosystem model (described): A city park ecosystem model shows: oak tree (living) takes in air matter (nonliving) and soil matter (nonliving). A squirrel (living) eats acorns (oak tree matter). A fox (living) eats squirrels. Decomposers (living) take in dead matter from all organisms. Decomposer matter becomes part of the soil (nonliving). Arrows are labeled with the matter moving, and the model states: Matter cycles through ecosystems.
Claim evaluation: Which claim is NOT supported by evidence from the ecosystem model?
- Matter can move from dead organisms to decomposers and then into the soil, helping explain how matter can cycle
- Matter from the oak tree can move into squirrels when squirrels eat acorns
- Some matter moves from the nonliving environment into the oak tree, shown by arrows from air and soil to the tree
- Matter moves through the ecosystem only one time; once it enters the fox, it cannot ever return to the environment (correct answer)
Explanation: The core skill in tracing matter in ecosystems is evaluating which claims are unsupported by model evidence. Matter moves through ecosystems in cycles, from environment to organisms and back, not stopping at consumers. Models show this with arrows indicating returns, like from decomposers to soil. A checking strategy is to cross-reference claims with arrow labels for contradictions. One misconception is that matter flows once without recycling, but models prove otherwise. Tracing matter highlights recycling's role in sustainability. This process generally explains how ecosystems maintain functional balance.
Question 11
Ecosystem model (described): A meadow ecosystem model has clover (living) deer (living) wolf (living). Dead matter from clover, deer, and wolves moves to decomposers (living). Decomposer matter moves into the soil (nonliving). Clover takes in soil matter and air matter (nonliving). Arrows are labeled with the type of matter moving. The model states: Matter cycles through ecosystems.
Error detection: A student redraws the model and makes one change: they remove the arrow from decomposers to soil because they think decomposers use up dead matter so nothing is left. Which statement best explains why this change is an error, using evidence from the model?
- Removing the arrow is correct because matter is destroyed when decomposers get energy from dead matter
- Removing the arrow breaks the evidence that matter can move from living decomposers into a nonliving part (soil), which helps show matter cycling (correct answer)
- Removing the arrow is fine because arrows represent energy, not matter, so the labels do not matter
- The arrow is unnecessary because matter only moves between clover, deer, and wolves
Explanation: The core skill in tracing matter in ecosystems is detecting errors in models that misrepresent cycling. Matter moves through ecosystems by cycling from living to nonliving parts, including decomposer contributions to soil. Models show this with arrows from decomposers to nonliving components, evidencing return flows. To check for errors, verify if changes align with the model's cycling statement. A misconception is that decomposers destroy matter, but they transform and release it. Tracing matter shows how accurate models depict sustainability. This generalization explains ecosystem functioning through balanced matter flows.
Question 12
Ecosystem model (described): A tundra ecosystem model includes moss (living), lemming (living), owl (living), decomposers (living), and nonliving components: soil and air. Labeled arrows show: soil matter moss; air matter moss; moss matter lemming; lemming matter owl; dead matter decomposers; decomposer matter soil. The model states: Matter cycles through ecosystems.
Which path shows matter moving from a nonliving component into living organisms and then back to a nonliving component?
- Moss matter lemming matter owl matter, and then the matter becomes energy and leaves the ecosystem
- Soil matter moss lemming owl dead matter decomposers soil (correct answer)
- Air matter moss, and then matter cannot move to lemmings because lemmings only get energy from moss
- Soil matter decomposers dead matter owl, because matter can move backward along arrows if needed
Explanation: The core skill in tracing matter in ecosystems is mapping complete paths that show cycling between living and nonliving. Matter moves through ecosystems starting from nonliving sources, through organisms, and back via decomposers. Models depict this with looped arrows, like from soil to producers and decomposers back to soil. To check paths, ensure they form a cycle without matter loss. A misconception is that matter turns to energy and exits, but it remains cycled. Tracing such paths illustrates nutrient continuity. Overall, this explains ecosystem functioning through matter conservation.
Question 13
Refer to the ecosystem model. Which statement about matter movement is supported by evidence in the model and shows that matter cycles through ecosystems?
Model: Plant → Grasshopper → Frog; dead organisms/waste → Decomposers; decomposers → Soil nutrients; soil nutrients → Plant; Plant ↔ Air (matter taken in and released).
- The arrows show energy only, so the model does not provide evidence about matter movement.
- Matter from dead organisms and waste can become soil nutrients that plants take in, helping matter move from organisms to the environment and back to organisms. (correct answer)
- Matter only moves within living organisms; nonliving parts like air and soil do not contain matter in this model.
- Matter moves one way from plants to animals and then stays in the environment forever once organisms die.
Explanation: Tracing matter in ecosystems involves following atoms and molecules as they move between organisms and the environment. Matter moves through ecosystems by cycling between living things and nonliving components like air, water, and soil. Models show this cycling using arrows that indicate the direction of matter movement from one component to another. To verify matter cycling, look for pathways where matter returns to its starting point through decomposition and nutrient uptake. A common misconception is that matter only moves in one direction, but it actually cycles continuously. Option C correctly identifies that decomposers break down dead matter into soil nutrients that plants can absorb, completing the cycle. This cycling of matter explains how ecosystems can continue functioning without running out of essential materials.
Question 14
Use the ecosystem model to trace matter and evaluate a claim. Which claim about matter is incorrect based on the evidence in the model?
Model: Tree → Caterpillar → Bird; dead organisms/waste → Decomposers; decomposers → Soil nutrients; soil nutrients → Tree; Tree ↔ Air (matter taken in and released). Statement included: Matter cycles through ecosystems.
- Matter can move from soil nutrients into a tree, and then into a caterpillar that eats the tree's leaves.
- Some matter in a bird's body can later become part of decomposers after the bird dies or makes waste.
- Matter is created when decomposers break down dead organisms, so there is more matter in the ecosystem after decomposition. (correct answer)
- The model includes both living parts (tree, caterpillar, bird, decomposers) and nonliving parts (air, soil nutrients) that matter moves through.
Explanation: Tracing matter in ecosystems means tracking atoms and molecules as they move through food webs and environmental components. Matter moves through ecosystems by passing from one organism to another and cycling between living and nonliving parts. Models show this cycling with arrows connecting producers, consumers, decomposers, and environmental components like soil and air. To identify incorrect claims, check if they violate the law of conservation of matter, which states matter cannot be created or destroyed. The misconception in option C is that decomposers create new matter, when they actually just break down existing matter into simpler forms. Options A, B, and D correctly describe matter movement and cycling shown in the model. Understanding that matter is conserved helps explain how ecosystems maintain balance over long periods.
Question 15
Refer to the ecosystem model. What evidence in the model shows that matter cycles through ecosystems (moves between organisms and the environment and can return to organisms)?
Model: Algae → Snail → Fish; dead organisms/waste → Decomposers; decomposers → Water nutrients; water nutrients → Algae; Fish → Water (waste matter).
- Arrows show that matter can move from organisms to decomposers, into water nutrients, and back into algae. (correct answer)
- There is an arrow from algae to snail, so matter moves only from producers to consumers and stops there.
- Because water is nonliving, it cannot contain matter that organisms can use.
- The fish is larger than the snail, proving matter increases as it moves through the ecosystem.
Explanation: Tracing matter in ecosystems involves following the movement of atoms and molecules through different organisms and environmental components. Matter moves through ecosystems in continuous cycles, passing from producers to consumers to decomposers and back to the environment. Models show this cycling using arrows that indicate how matter flows between living and nonliving parts of the ecosystem. To find evidence of cycling, look for pathways where matter returns to organisms after passing through the environment. A common misconception is that matter stops moving or disappears, but it actually continues cycling. Option B correctly identifies the complete cycle: algae to snail to fish to decomposers to water nutrients and back to algae. This cycling of matter explains how aquatic ecosystems can sustain life indefinitely.
Question 16
Use the ecosystem model to trace matter. Which statement about matter movement is supported by evidence in the model?
Model: Cactus → Insect → Roadrunner; dead organisms/waste → Decomposers; decomposers → Soil nutrients; soil nutrients → Cactus; Cactus ↔ Air (matter taken in and released).
- Matter that leaves a cactus into the air is gone from the ecosystem forever.
- Matter can move from air into the cactus and can also move from organisms to decomposers and then to soil nutrients that the cactus can take in again. (correct answer)
- Because the cactus is living, it can create matter from nothing whenever it needs to grow.
- The arrows show the direction of energy only, so they cannot be used to trace matter.
Explanation: Tracing matter in ecosystems means tracking how atoms and molecules move between organisms and environmental components. Matter moves through ecosystems in cycles, including exchange between organisms and the atmosphere through processes like photosynthesis and respiration. Models show this cycling with bidirectional arrows for air exchange and unidirectional arrows for feeding and decomposition. To trace matter accurately, follow all arrows including those showing matter exchange with air. A common misconception is that matter leaving organisms is lost forever, but it remains in the ecosystem. Option B correctly describes that matter moves between air and cactus, and also cycles through decomposers and soil nutrients back to the cactus. Understanding these multiple pathways explains how desert ecosystems conserve and recycle limited resources.
Question 17
Refer to the ecosystem model. Which path correctly traces matter moving between organisms and the environment and supports the idea that matter cycles through ecosystems?
Model: Shrub → Deer; Deer → Mountain lion; dead organisms/waste → Decomposers; decomposers → Soil nutrients; soil nutrients → Shrub; Shrub ↔ Air (matter taken in and released).
- Soil nutrients → Shrub → Deer → Mountain lion → Dead/waste → Decomposers → Soil nutrients (correct answer)
- Shrub → Deer → Mountain lion → (matter turns into energy and is gone)
- Air → Shrub → Deer → Mountain lion, and then matter stays only inside the mountain lion forever
- Shrub → Deer → Shrub (because a model means deer directly become shrubs)
Explanation: Tracing matter in ecosystems involves tracking atoms and molecules as they move through organisms and between living and nonliving components. Matter moves through ecosystems in cycles, passing from the environment to producers to consumers and back to the environment through decomposition. Models show this cycling with arrows that create complete loops, demonstrating that matter is reused rather than lost. To verify a complete cycle, start at any point and follow arrows to see if you can return to the starting point. A common misconception is that matter disappears or turns into energy, but matter is conserved and only changes form. Option A correctly traces a complete cycle from soil nutrients through organisms and decomposers back to soil nutrients. This cycling of matter explains how ecosystems can function continuously without depleting resources.
Question 18
Use the ecosystem model to detect an error. A student says: "Because the arrows go from plants to animals, matter only moves in one direction and does not return to the environment." Which evidence from the model best shows the student's statement is wrong and that matter cycles through ecosystems?
Model: Flowers → Beetle → Lizard; dead organisms/waste → Decomposers; decomposers → Soil nutrients; soil nutrients → Flowers; Flowers ↔ Air (matter taken in and released).
- The model shows decomposers and soil nutrients with arrows from dead matter & waste to decomposers and from soil nutrients back to flowers. (correct answer)
- The model shows that lizards are at the top of the chain, so matter must stop with lizards.
- The model's arrows are just drawings, so they do not count as evidence of matter movement.
- The model shows sunlight is the source of matter for flowers.
Explanation: Tracing matter in ecosystems means following how atoms and molecules move through food webs and environmental components. Matter moves through ecosystems by cycling between organisms and nonliving parts like air, water, and soil nutrients. Models show this cycling using arrows that indicate matter movement in specific directions, creating complete cycles. To identify errors in understanding, look for evidence of matter returning to the environment through decomposition pathways. A common misconception is that matter only moves from plants to animals in one direction, ignoring decomposition. Option A correctly identifies that the model shows decomposers and the pathway from dead matter back to soil nutrients and then to flowers, proving matter cycles. Understanding complete cycles explains how ecosystems sustain themselves without running out of essential materials.
Question 19
Use the ecosystem model to make a prediction. If decomposers greatly decrease in this ecosystem, which prediction about matter movement is supported by the model?
Model: Grass → Mouse → Owl; dead organisms/waste → Decomposers; decomposers → Soil nutrients; soil nutrients → Grass. Statement included: Matter cycles through ecosystems.
- More soil nutrients will be available because fewer decomposers means less matter is broken down.
- Less matter will move from dead organisms and waste into soil nutrients, so less matter will return to grass over time. (correct answer)
- Matter will stop moving because only living organisms can move matter, and decomposers are not important.
- Owls will create new matter to replace what is missing from the soil.
Explanation: Tracing matter in ecosystems means following how atoms and molecules move through food chains and decomposition processes. Matter moves through ecosystems by cycling between organisms and environmental components like soil, water, and air. Models show this cycling with arrows indicating matter flow, including the crucial role of decomposers in returning matter to the environment. To make predictions, trace what happens when one component changes and follow the arrows to see downstream effects. A common misconception is that decomposers are unimportant, but they are essential for recycling matter back to producers. Option B correctly predicts that fewer decomposers means less matter will be broken down and returned to soil nutrients, reducing matter available to grass. Understanding decomposer roles explains how ecosystems maintain nutrient availability over time.
Question 20
Use the ecosystem model to trace matter. Which prediction about matter movement is supported by the model if the decomposers decreased a lot in number? Use evidence from the model and the idea that matter cycles through ecosystems.
- More matter would be returned to the soil nutrients because fewer decomposers means less competition.
- Less matter would move from dead organisms to soil nutrients, so less matter would be available to move into plants. (correct answer)
- Matter would stop moving between organisms because decomposers are the only organisms that eat.
- Energy would stop entering the ecosystem, so matter would disappear from all organisms.
Explanation: This question tests predicting changes in matter movement when ecosystem components change. Matter moves through ecosystems in interconnected pathways, with each organism playing a specific role in the cycle. Models show these connections through labeled arrows, revealing how disrupting one component affects the entire system. To make predictions, trace the normal matter flow, then consider what happens when a key component decreases. Students often think fewer organisms means less competition and more resources, but decomposers are essential for returning matter to usable forms. Tracing matter helps predict that reducing decomposers would create a bottleneck, limiting nutrient availability for plants and ultimately affecting the entire ecosystem.