All questions
Question 1
A plant species grows in two habitats. Habitat W is windy and dry; Habitat S is sheltered and moist. In Habitat W, plants with waxy leaves produced 40 seeds per plant on average, while plants with thin leaves produced 15. In Habitat S, plants with thin leaves produced 38 seeds per plant, while plants with waxy leaves produced 20. Which explanation shows how environmental conditions affect which trait is advantageous, using the evidence?
- Waxy leaves are always better because they look tougher, so they should produce more seeds in both habitats.
- Plants in the windy habitat grew waxy leaves because they needed them, and plants in the moist habitat grew thin leaves because they wanted to absorb more water.
- The windy, dry habitat is linked to higher seed production for waxy-leaf plants (40 vs. 15), while the sheltered, moist habitat is linked to higher seed production for thin-leaf plants (38 vs. 20), so the environment influences which leaf trait is advantageous. (correct answer)
- Because both habitats have plants, leaf traits do not affect success; all plants should reproduce equally.
Explanation: The core skill is understanding how the environment shapes which traits are advantageous for survival and reproduction in a species. Environments differ in weather and moisture, like windy dry habitats versus sheltered moist ones. Evidence shows different trait success, with waxy-leaf plants producing more seeds in dry areas (40 per plant) and thin-leaf in moist (38 per plant). To check this, assess seed production metrics for traits in each habitat type. A common misconception is that plants grow specific leaves because they 'need' or 'want' them, but advantages come from inherited traits succeeding better. When environments change, such as a moist area drying out, waxy leaves might become favored. In this way, changing environments redefine trait advantages over generations.
Question 2
A scientist studies the same species of lizard on two islands. Island R has many hawks (predators) and rocky ground. Island L has few hawks and lots of leafy plants. After marking 200 lizards of each type on each island, the scientist finds:
- Island R: 70% of lizards with long legs survived 3 months; 35% of lizards with short legs survived.
- Island L: 60% of lizards with short legs survived 3 months; 40% of lizards with long legs survived.
Which claim about environment and traits is incorrect?
- The environment influences which leg-length trait is advantageous because survival patterns differ between Island R and Island L.
- Long legs may be advantageous on Island R, while short legs may be advantageous on Island L, based on the survival percentages.
- Because Island R has many hawks, the hawks caused individual lizards to grow longer legs during the 3 months so they could escape. (correct answer)
- Evidence links each island's conditions to different survival outcomes for long- and short-legged lizards.
Explanation: The core skill is understanding how the environment shapes which traits are advantageous for survival and reproduction in a species. Environments differ in factors like predator presence and terrain, such as hawk-filled rocky islands versus leafy ones with few predators. Evidence shows different trait success, with long-legged lizards surviving better on rocky islands (70%) and short-legged ones on leafy islands (60%). To check this, analyze survival percentages for traits in each environment to determine which confers an advantage. A common misconception is that environments cause individuals to alter their traits, like growing longer legs, but selection acts on existing variations. If environments change, such as more predators invading a leafy island, short legs might become less favored. Consequently, evolving environments can reverse which traits are most successful over time.
Question 3
A fish species lives in two lakes. Lake A has clear water; Lake B has muddy water. In Lake A, 90 out of 120 fish with bright stripes survived a season, while 50 out of 120 fish with dull coloring survived. In Lake B, 40 out of 120 bright-striped fish survived, while 85 out of 120 dull-colored fish survived. What evidence best links environment to trait success?
- Bright stripes are more attractive, so they must always lead to higher survival regardless of the lake.
- Clear water is better than muddy water, so fish in Lake A survive more because the lake is nicer.
- Fish survival depends on luck, so the color differences are not useful evidence.
- In Lake A, bright stripes have higher survival (90/120) than dull coloring (50/120), but in Lake B, dull coloring has higher survival (85/120) than bright stripes (40/120). (correct answer)
Explanation: The core skill is understanding how the environment shapes which traits are advantageous for survival and reproduction in a species. Environments differ in clarity, like clear lakes versus muddy ones affecting visibility. Evidence shows different trait success, with bright-striped fish surviving more in clear water (90/120) and dull-colored ones in muddy water (85/120). To check this, compare survival numbers across traits and environments to link conditions to advantages. A common misconception is that brighter traits are always superior due to attractiveness, but success varies by context. When environments change, such as a clear lake becoming muddy, dull coloring might gain the advantage. This illustrates how shifting environments redefine favorable traits in populations.
Question 4
A scientist compares the same species of snail in two streams. Stream F has fast-moving water; Stream S has slow-moving water. After a flood season, the scientist records:
- Stream F: 72% of snails with a low, flat shell stayed attached to rocks; 30% of snails with a tall shell stayed attached.
- Stream S: 65% of tall-shell snails stayed attached; 50% of flat-shell snails stayed attached.
Which claim about environment and traits is incorrect?
- Flat shells may provide an advantage in fast water, while tall shells may provide an advantage in slow water, based on the attachment data.
- Because the fast stream is dangerous, it created flat shells in the snails so they could survive the flood season. (correct answer)
- The evidence shows that trait success changes with environmental conditions, so the environment influences which trait is advantageous.
- Different shell shapes can have different success depending on the stream conditions, as shown by the different percentages.
Explanation: The core skill is understanding how the environment shapes which traits are advantageous for survival and reproduction in a species. Environments differ in water flow, like fast streams versus slow ones impacting attachment. Evidence shows different trait success, with flat-shell snails staying attached more in fast water (72%) and tall-shell in slow (65%). To check this, examine attachment percentages for shell types in varying stream conditions. A common misconception is that harsh environments create new traits in individuals, like flattening shells, but they select for pre-existing ones. When environments change, such as a slow stream speeding up, flat shells might become more advantageous. This demonstrates how altering environments can switch favored traits in species.
Question 5
A frog species lives in two ponds. Pond P has many fish predators; Pond N has no fish predators. In Pond P, 18 out of 60 tadpoles with a spotted pattern survived to become frogs, while 5 out of 60 plain-pattern tadpoles survived. In Pond N, 40 out of 60 plain-pattern tadpoles survived, while 22 out of 60 spotted-pattern tadpoles survived. Which statement about trait advantage is supported by the evidence?
- Spotted tadpoles survive more in Pond P, while plain tadpoles survive more in Pond N, so the environment (presence of predators) influences which pattern trait is advantageous. (correct answer)
- Spots are always better because they look more complex, so spotted tadpoles should survive the most in both ponds.
- All tadpoles will become spotted over time because predators make species improve by giving them the trait they need.
- Since Pond P and Pond N are both ponds, pattern cannot affect survival; only being a frog matters.
Explanation: The core skill is understanding how the environment shapes which traits are advantageous for survival and reproduction in a species. Environments differ in threats, like ponds with fish predators versus those without. Evidence shows different trait success, with spotted tadpoles surviving more in predator ponds (18/60) and plain in non-predator (40/60). To check this, evaluate transformation rates to frogs for patterns in each pond type. A common misconception is that predators cause species to develop needed traits over time, but they select among existing variations. When environments change, such as adding predators to a safe pond, spotted patterns might gain advantage. Hence, shifting environments can change which traits are most successful for survival.
Question 6
The same species of moth lives in two forests. Forest 1 has dark tree bark because of soot. Forest 2 has light tree bark. In Forest 1, 65% of dark-winged moths survived to reproduce, while 20% of light-winged moths survived. In Forest 2, 60% of light-winged moths survived to reproduce, while 25% of dark-winged moths survived. Which prediction about trait success is supported if Forest 2 becomes darker over many years due to soot?
- Dark-winged moths are likely to have higher survival in the darkened Forest 2 than they did before, because dark wings were more successful in the dark-bark forest. (correct answer)
- Light-winged moths will remain the most successful everywhere because being light is a universally best trait.
- Light-winged moths will automatically turn dark as soon as the bark darkens, because the environment creates the needed trait.
- Trait differences do not matter; only the amount of soot determines which moths survive.
Explanation: The core skill is understanding how the environment shapes which traits are advantageous for survival and reproduction in a species. Environments differ in elements like bark color due to soot, such as dark forests versus light ones. Evidence shows different trait success, with dark-winged moths surviving better in sooty forests (65%) and light-winged in clean ones (60%). To check this, evaluate reproduction survival rates for traits in varying conditions. A common misconception is that traits automatically change to match new environments, but selection favors existing traits. If environments change, like a light forest darkening with soot, dark wings could become more advantageous. Therefore, environmental shifts can alter which traits promote the most success.
Question 7
The same species of mouse lives in two regions. Region C has cold winters; Region H has hot summers. In Region C, 68 out of 100 mice with thick fur survived the winter, while 35 out of 100 mice with thin fur survived. In Region H, 70 out of 100 thin-fur mice survived the summer, while 40 out of 100 thick-fur mice survived. Which explanation shows how the environment affects which trait has an advantage, using the evidence?
- The cold region is linked to higher survival for thick-fur mice (68/100), while the hot region is linked to higher survival for thin-fur mice (70/100), showing that the environment influences which fur trait is advantageous. (correct answer)
- Mice grew thicker or thinner fur during the season because they needed to match the temperature in their region.
- Thick fur is a universal best trait because it provides more protection, so it should be advantageous in both regions.
- Temperature alone determines survival, so fur traits are not relevant evidence.
Explanation: The core skill is understanding how the environment shapes which traits are advantageous for survival and reproduction in a species. Environments differ in temperature, such as cold winter regions versus hot summer ones. Evidence shows different trait success, with thick-fur mice surviving better in cold (68/100) and thin-fur in hot (70/100). To check this, compare seasonal survival rates for fur types in each climate. A common misconception is that animals grow fur thickness in response to needs, but environmental selection acts on inherited traits. If environments change, like a hot region cooling, thick fur could become more favored. Accordingly, environmental changes reshape which traits offer the greatest advantages.
Question 8
A rabbit species has two fur thicknesses: thick fur and thin fur. Scientists tracked winter survival in two regions.
Region 1: Long, cold winters
- Survival rate: 78% thick fur, 35% thin fur
Region 2: Mild winters
- Survival rate: 60% thick fur, 62% thin fur
Which statement about trait advantage is supported by the evidence?
- Thick fur is always advantageous because it is warmer, so thick-fur rabbits should survive best in both regions.
- Rabbits grow thick fur only when they decide they need it, so survival differences are not related to traits.
- Thick fur is more advantageous in the colder region, but in the mild region neither fur type shows a clear survival advantage. (correct answer)
- The cold region created thick-fur rabbits, while the mild region created thin-fur rabbits.
Explanation: The core skill is analyzing evidence to determine environment-specific trait advantages. Environments differ in climate, with cold winters versus mild ones affecting insulation needs. Survival rates show thick-fur rabbits have a clear advantage in cold regions, but neither fur type dominates in mild areas. To confirm, review data for significant differences in success metrics across environments. One misconception is that traits are always universally beneficial, but their advantages depend on specific conditions. If an environment changes, like warming trends, thick fur might lose its edge. Thus, changing environments can redefine which traits promote better survival and population shifts.
Question 9
A bird species has two beak shapes: thick beaks and thin beaks. In two different habitats, scientists measured how many chicks fledged (successfully left the nest) per 10 nesting pairs.
Habitat A: Mostly hard seeds
- Thick beak: 18 chicks per 10 pairs
- Thin beak: 7 chicks per 10 pairs
Habitat B: Mostly soft insects
- Thick beak: 6 chicks per 10 pairs
- Thin beak: 17 chicks per 10 pairs
Which statement about trait advantage is supported by the evidence?
- The habitat determines survival so strongly that beak shape does not matter.
- Thick beaks are always advantageous because they can crush more foods in any habitat.
- Because the birds live in different habitats, they will all develop the same beak shape within one generation.
- Beak shape advantage depends on the environment: thick beaks have higher success with hard seeds, while thin beaks have higher success with soft insects. (correct answer)
Explanation: The core skill is recognizing that the environment determines which traits are advantageous by influencing success in survival and reproduction. Environments differ in resources like food types, where hard seeds or soft insects can make certain traits more effective. Evidence from chick fledging rates demonstrates that thick-beaked birds have higher success in habitats with hard seeds, while thin-beaked ones excel in insect-rich areas. To verify, examine reproductive success data and identify which trait correlates with better outcomes in specific environments. One misconception is that a single trait is universally best, but advantages actually vary by environmental conditions. If an environment changes, such as a shift in available food, the favored beak shape may switch accordingly. Over time, this dynamic can alter the prevalence of traits within the population.
Question 10
A plant species has two leaf types: waxy leaves and non-waxy leaves. Researchers grew equal numbers of each type in two environments for 8 weeks.
Environment 1: Dry, windy hillside
- Plants that produced seeds: 42 waxy, 18 non-waxy
Environment 2: Humid, shaded forest
- Plants that produced seeds: 20 waxy, 40 non-waxy
What evidence best links environment to trait advantage in this species?
- Waxy leaves look shinier than non-waxy leaves, so waxy leaves must be the advantageous trait in both environments.
- Seed production differs by environment and leaf type: waxy leaves are associated with higher seed production on the dry hillside, while non-waxy leaves are associated with higher seed production in the humid forest. (correct answer)
- Plants in dry environments choose to grow waxy leaves because they want to keep water from evaporating.
- Because the hillside is windy, all plants there will become waxy-leaved during the 8 weeks, regardless of starting type.
Explanation: The core skill is using evidence to link environments to trait advantages in terms of reproductive success. Environments differ in conditions like humidity or wind, which can influence how well traits retain water or resources. Seed production data shows that waxy-leaved plants have higher success in dry, windy areas, while non-waxy ones do better in humid forests. To check, compare success indicators like seed counts between traits in each environment for patterns. A common misconception is that plants choose or alter traits intentionally, but advantages stem from natural variation and selection. If environments change, such as increased dryness, waxy leaves might become more favored. Ultimately, this process highlights how shifting conditions redefine which traits enhance survival and reproduction.
Question 11
A mouse species includes individuals with large ears and individuals with small ears. In two environments, scientists measured average water loss per hour (lower water loss means higher success in dry conditions).
Environment 1: Hot, dry desert
- Large ears: 3.0 mL/hour
- Small ears: 1.5 mL/hour
Environment 2: Cool, moist grassland
- Large ears: 1.0 mL/hour
- Small ears: 1.1 mL/hour
Which statement is best supported by the evidence about how the environment influences which trait is advantageous?
- Large ears are always the advantageous trait because they look bigger and stronger.
- In the desert, small ears are advantageous because they are linked to lower water loss; in the grassland, neither ear size shows a strong advantage because the values are very similar. (correct answer)
- The desert environment will make all mice grow small ears immediately, even if they were born with large ears.
- Only the environment matters, so ear size cannot be connected to differences in water loss.
Explanation: The core skill is evaluating how environments influence trait advantages through metrics like resource conservation. Environments differ in aridity, with deserts requiring better water retention than moist grasslands. Water loss data links small ears to lower loss in deserts, but shows no strong advantage in grasslands. To assess, compare quantitative measures and identify environment-specific benefits. A misconception is that environments immediately reshape traits, but they act on existing variations. If an environment changes, like increasing dryness, small ears might gain favor. Overall, this highlights that trait advantages are fluid, adapting to environmental shifts.
Question 12
In the same species of beetle, some individuals have dark shells and some have light shells. Researchers released equal numbers of dark and light beetles into two environments for one month.
Environment 1: Dark soil after a wildfire
- Survivors after 1 month: 80 dark, 20 light
Environment 2: Pale sandy soil near a beach
- Survivors after 1 month: 25 dark, 75 light
Which explanation best uses evidence to show how the environment influences which trait is advantageous?
- The beach environment created the light-shell trait in beetles so they could survive better there.
- Dark shells are the best trait for beetles in all environments, so the dark beetles should eventually outcompete light beetles everywhere.
- Different environments favor different shell colors: dark shells have an advantage on dark soil, while light shells have an advantage on pale sand, as shown by the survivor counts. (correct answer)
- Beetles changed their shell color during the month because they needed to match the ground to avoid predators.
Explanation: The core skill is understanding how the environment shapes which traits provide an advantage for survival and reproduction in a species. Environments differ in features like soil color or predator presence, making some traits more helpful in one setting than another. Evidence from survivor counts shows that dark-shelled beetles succeed more in dark soil environments, while light-shelled ones do better in pale sandy areas due to better camouflage. To check trait advantages, compare metrics like survival rates across environments and note which trait has higher success in each. A common misconception is that environments create new traits on demand, but they actually favor existing variations already present in the population. When environments change, such as through habitat alteration, the previously advantageous traits may lose their edge. Consequently, different traits can become favored, leading to shifts in population characteristics over generations.
Question 13
A snail species has two shell patterns: striped and solid. Predatory fish hunt by sight. Scientists counted how many snails were eaten in two environments over 2 days (starting with 100 of each type).
Environment A: Rocky bottom with light-and-dark patches
- Eaten: 30 striped, 70 solid
Environment B: Smooth, uniform dark mud
- Eaten: 75 striped, 25 solid
Which prediction is supported if the environments stay the same for many generations?
- Striped shells will become more common in Environment A, and solid shells will become more common in Environment B, because each has higher survival in that environment. (correct answer)
- Both environments will eventually produce the same shell pattern because the best trait is universal.
- Snails will change their shell pattern during their lifetime to match whichever bottom they live on.
- Shell pattern cannot affect survival because predators eat the same number of snails in every environment.
Explanation: The core skill is predicting trait frequency changes based on environmental influences on advantage. Environments differ in substrate patterns, like patchy rocks versus uniform mud, affecting visibility to predators. Predation data shows striped snails are less eaten in patchy environments, while solid ones fare better in uniform dark mud. To predict, analyze survival differences and project which trait will increase over generations. A misconception is that individuals alter traits during their lifetime, but changes occur through generational selection. When environments change, such as substrate alterations, the favored pattern may switch. This process underscores how evolving conditions favor different traits, altering population compositions.
Question 14
A frog species has two skin types: more bumpy skin and smoother skin. Scientists compared how many frogs were infected by a fungus after 6 weeks (lower infection rate means higher success).
Environment A: Cool pond
- Infected: 40% bumpy, 70% smooth
Environment B: Warm pond
- Infected: 65% bumpy, 35% smooth
Which explanation best evaluates the claim: "Bumpy skin is the best trait for frogs everywhere"?
- The claim is supported because bumpy skin is always better protection, even if the data sometimes looks different.
- The claim cannot be evaluated because traits do not affect infection; only the fungus decides who gets sick.
- The claim is not supported because the environment influences advantage: bumpy skin is linked to lower infection in the cool pond, but smooth skin is linked to lower infection in the warm pond. (correct answer)
- The claim is supported because frogs can choose to grow bumps when they want to avoid infection.
Explanation: The core skill is using evidence to evaluate claims about universal trait advantages across environments. Environments differ in temperature, affecting infection risks for traits like skin texture. Infection rates show bumpy skin has lower infections in cool ponds, but smooth skin does better in warm ones. To evaluate, check if data supports universality or reveals environment-dependent advantages. A misconception is that organisms choose traits to avoid threats, but selection operates on variations. When environments change, such as temperature fluctuations, the beneficial skin type may alter. This illustrates that no trait is always best; advantages shift with conditions.
Question 15
A fish species has two body colors: silver and mottled brown. Equal numbers were placed into two tanks with different backgrounds for 3 weeks.
Tank A: Clear water with light-colored gravel
- Surviving fish: 70 silver, 30 mottled
Tank B: Murky water with dark plants and logs
- Surviving fish: 28 silver, 72 mottled
Which explanation shows how environment affects trait success without claiming the environment creates traits?
- The environment influences which color is advantageous: silver fish had higher survival in Tank A, while mottled fish had higher survival in Tank B. (correct answer)
- Silver is the best color for fish, but the murky tank prevented silver fish from using their color advantage.
- Survival was based only on luck, so color cannot be related to advantage in either tank.
- The tank background changed the fish bodies from silver to mottled or from mottled to silver so they could blend in.
Explanation: The core skill is explaining how environments affect trait success without implying they create or alter traits. Environments differ in visibility factors, like water clarity or background color, impacting camouflage effectiveness. Survival data indicates silver fish thrive in clear, light-gravel tanks, while mottled ones survive better in murky, dark settings. To evaluate explanations, ensure they focus on selection of existing traits rather than trait creation. A misconception is that individuals change traits to match environments, but success differences arise from pre-existing variations. When environments change, such as water becoming murkier, the advantageous color may shift. This demonstrates that trait favorability evolves with environmental conditions over generations.
Question 16
A lizard species includes individuals with long legs and individuals with short legs. Scientists compared the average number of insects caught in 10 minutes in two environments.
Environment X: Open, flat ground
- Long legs: 12 insects
- Short legs: 6 insects
Environment Y: Dense shrubs with many branches
- Long legs: 5 insects
- Short legs: 11 insects
Which claim about environment and traits is incorrect based on the evidence?
- Short legs are advantageous in dense shrubs because those lizards caught more insects there.
- Long legs are advantageous in open, flat ground because those lizards caught more insects there.
- Different environments can favor different traits within the same species, based on differences in success.
- The environment created long legs in Environment X and created short legs in Environment Y. (correct answer)
Explanation: The core skill involves identifying how environments shape trait advantages without creating traits themselves. Environments differ in structure, such as open flats versus dense shrubs, affecting how traits aid in tasks like hunting. Evidence from insect-catching rates reveals that long-legged lizards perform better in open areas, while short-legged ones succeed in shrubby environments. To assess claims, evaluate if they align with data showing differential success rather than assuming environments generate traits. A misconception is that environments directly create or change traits, but they select among existing variations. When environments change, like through vegetation growth, the advantageous leg length may shift. This illustrates that trait favorability is not fixed but adapts to environmental variations over time.
Question 17
A grasshopper species has two body colors: green and tan. In two fields, scientists counted how many grasshoppers survived after predators hunted for one week.
Field 1: Green grass (summer)
- Survivors: 85 green, 15 tan
Field 2: Brown, dry grass (late fall)
- Survivors: 20 green, 80 tan
If Field 1 changes over the season and becomes brown and dry like Field 2, which prediction about trait success is supported by the evidence?
- Color will not matter after the change because the environment alone determines survival, not traits.
- Tan grasshoppers will likely have higher survival in the changed field, because tan had higher survival in the brown, dry environment. (correct answer)
- Green grasshoppers will still have the advantage because green is the best color in all seasons.
- All grasshoppers will turn tan during the week because they need to match the dry grass to survive.
Explanation: The core skill is predicting shifts in trait advantages when environments change. Environments differ seasonally, like green summer grass versus brown fall dryness, influencing camouflage. Survival data shows green grasshoppers thrive in green fields, while tan ones do in brown, dry ones. To predict, use existing data to infer outcomes in similar changed conditions. A misconception is that individuals change color to adapt quickly, but advantages affect reproduction over generations. If an environment changes, such as drying out, tan might become more advantageous. This shows how environmental variations continually reshape which traits are favored in populations.
Question 18
A bird species lives in two places. City parks have many hard seeds; coastal wetlands have mostly soft insects. In the city parks, birds with thick beaks ate enough food to raise chicks in 55 out of 70 nests, while birds with thin beaks succeeded in 20 out of 70 nests. In the wetlands, thin-beaked birds succeeded in 50 out of 70 nests, while thick-beaked birds succeeded in 25 out of 70 nests. Which statement about trait advantage is supported by the evidence?
- Birds can decide to grow thicker or thinner beaks during the nesting season depending on what food is available.
- The environment influences which beak trait is advantageous: thick beaks have higher nesting success in city parks, while thin beaks have higher nesting success in wetlands. (correct answer)
- Thin beaks are morally better because they do not harm insects as much, so thin-beaked birds should succeed more in all places.
- Only the type of place (city or wetland) determines success, so beak traits are not evidence for differences in survival or reproduction.
Explanation: The core skill is understanding how the environment shapes which traits are advantageous for survival and reproduction in a species. Environments differ in food sources, such as hard seeds in city parks versus soft insects in wetlands. Evidence shows different trait success, with thick-beaked birds raising more chicks in parks (55/70 nests) and thin-beaked in wetlands (50/70). To check this, review nesting success rates tied to traits across locations. A common misconception is that birds can choose to change beak thickness seasonally, but traits are fixed and selected by environmental fit. If environments change, like wetlands gaining hard seeds, thick beaks could gain advantage. Thus, environmental variations continually influence which traits are most beneficial.
Question 19
The same species of rabbit lives in two areas. In a snowy field, rabbits with white fur produced an average of 6 offspring per adult each season, while rabbits with brown fur produced 2. In a brown grassland, rabbits with brown fur produced 5 offspring per adult, while rabbits with white fur produced 2. Which statement about trait advantage is supported by the evidence?
- Fur color advantage depends on the environment: white fur has higher success in snow, and brown fur has higher success in grassland. (correct answer)
- All rabbits will eventually become white because snow is a harder environment and forces the species to improve.
- White fur is always more advantageous because it looks cleaner and healthier than brown fur.
- Rabbits choose their fur color each season depending on what they want to blend into.
Explanation: The core skill is understanding how the environment shapes which traits are advantageous for survival and reproduction in a species. Environments differ in conditions like snowfall in fields versus brown grass in plains. Evidence shows different trait success, such as white-furred rabbits producing more offspring in snowy areas (6 per adult) while brown-furred ones do better in grasslands (5 per adult). To check this, examine reproduction rates for each trait in different settings to identify patterns of advantage. A common misconception is that animals choose or change their traits to match the environment, but traits are inherited and selected by success. When environments change, like a grassland becoming snowy, the advantageous traits may shift to favor white fur. Thus, changing environments continually reshape which traits provide the best survival and reproductive edge.
Question 20
A species of beetle lives in two environments. In a dark forest, 80 out of 100 dark-colored beetles survived one month, while 30 out of 100 light-colored beetles survived. On a pale sandy beach, 25 out of 100 dark-colored beetles survived, while 75 out of 100 light-colored beetles survived. Which explanation shows how the environment affects which trait has an advantage, using the evidence?
- Dark color is the best trait for beetles in every environment because it is stronger, so it should have the highest survival everywhere.
- Beetles changed their color during the month because each environment demanded the color they needed to survive.
- The forest environment is linked to higher survival for dark beetles (80/100), while the beach environment is linked to higher survival for light beetles (75/100), so the environment influences which color trait is advantageous. (correct answer)
- Survival is determined only by the environment, not by traits, so the color differences do not matter.
Explanation: The core skill is understanding how the environment shapes which traits are advantageous for survival and reproduction in a species. Environments differ in features like color and texture, such as dark forests versus pale sandy beaches. Evidence shows different trait success, for example, dark-colored beetles have higher survival in forests (80/100) while light-colored ones succeed more on beaches (75/100). To check this, compare survival rates of traits across environments to see which trait links to higher success in each. A common misconception is that one trait is always best everywhere, but advantage depends on the specific environment. When environments change, such as a beach becoming darker, the favored traits may shift accordingly. Overall, this means that as conditions vary or evolve, different traits become advantageous for the population.