All questions
Question 1
Elena writes the fraction 85 as a decimal and gets 0.625. She then rounds this decimal to the nearest tenth to get 0.6, and converts 0.6 back to a fraction in lowest terms. What is the difference between her original fraction and her final fraction, expressed as a decimal?
- 0.025 (correct answer)
- 0.1
- 0.075
- 0.05
Explanation: Starting with 5/8 = 0.625. Rounding to the nearest tenth: 0.625 rounds to 0.6. Converting 0.6 back to a fraction: 0.6 = 6/10 = 3/5 in lowest terms. The difference between the original and final fractions: 5/8 - 3/5. To subtract, find a common denominator: 5/8 - 3/5 = 25/40 - 24/40 = 1/40 = 0.025. Choice A is correct. Choice B (0.1) might result from incorrectly calculating 0.625 - 0.6 without considering the fraction conversion. Choice C (0.075) could come from calculation errors. Choice D (0.05) might result from errors in finding the common denominator.
Question 2
A recipe calls for 2.75 cups of flour. Sarah only has a measuring cup marked in fractions. She needs to convert 2.75 to a mixed number. However, she wants the fractional part to have a denominator that is a power of 2. What mixed number should she use?
- 243 (correct answer)
- 2107
- 21611
- 22015
Explanation: First, convert 2.75 to a fraction: 2.75 = 2 + 0.75 = 2 + 75/100 = 2 + 3/4 (after reducing 75/100). So 2.75 = 2¾. We need to check which answer has a denominator that is a power of 2. Powers of 2 include: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32... Choice A: 2¾ has denominator 4 = 2², which is a power of 2. This is correct. Choice B: 2⁷⁄₁₀ has denominator 10, which is not a power of 2. Choice C: 2¹¹⁄₁₆ has denominator 16 = 2⁴, which is a power of 2, but 11/16 = 0.6875 ≠ 0.75. Choice D: 2¹⁵⁄₂₀ has denominator 20, which is not a power of 2.
Question 3
Jamie is comparing two fractions: 1611 and 0.6875. She converts the first fraction to a decimal and notices something interesting about the relationship between these two numbers. What is the value of 1611−0.6875?
- 0 (correct answer)
- 0.0625
- −0.0625
- 0.125
Explanation: First, convert 11/16 to a decimal. 11 ÷ 16 = 0.6875. So 11/16 = 0.6875. Therefore, 11/16 - 0.6875 = 0.6875 - 0.6875 = 0. The 'something interesting' Jamie notices is that the fraction and decimal are exactly equal. Choice A is correct. Choice B (0.0625) might result from a student who incorrectly converts 11/16 (perhaps getting 0.75 and then calculating 0.75 - 0.6875). Choice C (-0.0625) could result from calculation errors or switching the order of subtraction. Choice D (0.125) might come from various computational mistakes in the decimal conversion.
Question 4
A student claims that 0.45 is equivalent to 209. To verify this, she cross-multiplies and checks if 0.45×20=9×1. She calculates the left side as 9.0 and the right side as 9. Based on this verification method, what can she conclude?
- More information is needed to determine equivalence
- The fractions are not equivalent because 9.0 ≠ 9
- The verification method is invalid for decimal comparisons
- The fractions are equivalent because both sides equal 9 (correct answer)
Explanation: When comparing decimals and fractions, you can use cross-multiplication to check if they're equivalent. The student is testing whether 0.45=209 by treating the decimal as 10.45 and cross-multiplying: 0.45×20 versus 9×1.
Her calculation is correct: 0.45×20=9.0 and 9×1=9. Since 9.0 and 9 represent the same value (the decimal point and zero don't change the numerical value), the cross-products are equal, confirming that 0.45 and 209 are equivalent. This makes choice D correct.
Choice A is wrong because the cross-multiplication provides sufficient information to determine equivalence. Choice B represents a common misconception about decimal notation—9.0 and 9 are mathematically identical values, just written in different forms. The presence of a decimal point and trailing zero doesn't make the numbers unequal. Choice C is incorrect because cross-multiplication is a valid method for comparing any two fractions, including when one is written in decimal form. The verification method works perfectly fine for decimal comparisons.
Remember that 9, 9.0, 9.00, and 19 all represent the exact same number. When checking your work with cross-multiplication, focus on the numerical value, not the format. Trailing zeros after a decimal point don't change a number's value—they're just different ways of writing the same thing. Question 5
When converting 113 to a decimal, the result is 0.272. If someone mistakenly writes this as the non-repeating decimal 0.272 and then converts it back to a fraction in lowest terms, what fraction do they get?
- 1000272
- 12534 (correct answer)
- 500136
- 25068
Explanation: The person incorrectly treats 0.272̄ as 0.272 (non-repeating). Converting 0.272 to a fraction: 0.272 = 272/1000. To reduce to lowest terms, find GCD(272, 1000). 272 = 8 × 34 = 2³ × 34, and 1000 = 8 × 125 = 2³ × 125. The GCD is 8. Dividing both by 8: 272 ÷ 8 = 34 and 1000 ÷ 8 = 125. So 272/1000 = 34/125 in lowest terms. Choice B is correct. Choice A gives the unreduced fraction. Choice C (136/500) is what you get if you divide by 2 instead of 8. Choice D (68/250) is what you get if you divide by 4 instead of 8. Both C and D are not in lowest terms.
Question 6
A decimal 0.875 needs to be written as a fraction. After converting to 1000875, the next step is to reduce to lowest terms. How many times must you divide both the numerator and denominator by their greatest common factor to reach the fraction in lowest terms?
- You must divide once by 25, giving 4035, which is already in lowest terms
- You must divide twice: first by 25, then by 5
- You must divide three times: by 5, then 5 again, then 5 again
- You must divide once by 125 (correct answer)
Explanation: When you need to reduce a fraction to lowest terms, you're looking for the greatest common factor (GCF) of the numerator and denominator, then dividing both by that number in one step.
To find the GCF of 875 and 1000, let's find their prime factorizations:
- 875=53×7=125×7
- 1000=23×53=8×125
The GCF is 53=125 since that's the highest power of the common factor 5. Dividing both numerator and denominator by 125 gives us 1000÷125875÷125=87, which is in lowest terms since 7 and 8 share no common factors.
Answer choice A incorrectly divides by 25 instead of 125, giving 4035, which isn't fully reduced since both 35 and 40 are divisible by 5. Answer choice B suggests dividing twice (by 25, then by 5), which would work mathematically but isn't the most efficient approach since you're not using the greatest common factor in one step. Answer choice C suggests dividing by 5 three separate times, which again works but misses the point of finding the GCF.
The key insight is that reducing to lowest terms means finding the greatest common factor and dividing once, not repeatedly dividing by smaller common factors. Always look for the largest number that divides evenly into both parts of your fraction. Question 7
Three students convert 157 to a decimal. Alex gets 0.4666..., Bella gets 0.47, and Carlos gets 0.46. Which student(s) correctly converted the fraction?
- Only Alex correctly converted the fraction
- Only Carlos correctly converted the fraction
- Both Alex and Carlos correctly converted the fraction (correct answer)
- All three students correctly converted the fraction
Explanation: To convert 7/15 to a decimal, we perform long division: 7 ÷ 15 = 0.4666... where the 6 repeats infinitely. Alex wrote 0.4666..., which correctly shows the repeating pattern using ellipsis notation. Carlos wrote 0.4̄6̄, which correctly shows the repeating 6 using bar notation. Both representations are mathematically correct ways to express the same repeating decimal. Bella wrote 0.47, which is a rounded approximation but not the exact decimal equivalent of 7/15. Choice C is correct because both Alex and Carlos gave exact representations of the decimal, just using different notation conventions.