Home

Tutoring

Subjects

Live Classes

Study Coach

Essay Review

On-Demand Courses

Colleges

Games


Sign up

Log in

Opening subject page...

Loading your content

Practice

  • All Subjects
  • Algebra Flashcards
  • SAT Math Practice Tests
  • Math Question of the Day
  • Live Classes
  • On-Demand Courses

Varsity Tutors

  • Find a Tutor
  • Test Prep
  • Online Classes
  • K-12 Learning
  • College Search
  • VarsityTutors.com

© 2026 Varsity Tutors. All rights reserved.

← Back to quizzes

MCAT Psychological Social Foundations Quiz

MCAT Psychological Social Foundations Quiz: 6a Sensory Receptors Neural Pathways

Practice 6a Sensory Receptors Neural Pathways in MCAT Psychological Social Foundations with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

Question 1 / 20

0 of 20 answered

Researchers examined auditory transduction by presenting tones of increasing intensity while recording from the auditory nerve. As intensity increased, the recorded neural response increased in firing rate and recruited additional fibers. Which of the following best explains the sensory process described?

Select an answer to continue

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on 6a Sensory Receptors Neural Pathways, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for MCAT Psychological Social Foundations.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Researchers examined auditory transduction by presenting tones of increasing intensity while recording from the auditory nerve. As intensity increased, the recorded neural response increased in firing rate and recruited additional fibers. Which of the following best explains the sensory process described?

  1. Sound intensity is encoded by graded potentials traveling along axons to the brainstem
  2. Sound intensity is encoded by changes in action potential frequency and population recruitment in auditory afferents (correct answer)
  3. Sound intensity is encoded when motor efferents stimulate hair cells to fire action potentials directly
  4. Sound intensity is encoded primarily by the wavelength of light entering the retina

Explanation: This question examines encoding of stimulus intensity in auditory neural pathways. Sound intensity is coded by increased firing rates and recruitment of more auditory nerve fibers as stimulus strength grows. In the study, louder tones elicit higher firing and more fiber involvement, reflecting population coding. Choice B is correct as it describes frequency and recruitment changes in afferents, matching the recorded responses. Choice A is incorrect because graded potentials do not travel along axons; action potentials do. In similar auditory questions, differentiate intensity from frequency coding. Check if the mechanism involves rate coding or place coding.

Question 2

Investigators evaluated adaptation in olfaction. Participants continuously inhaled a constant concentration of a vanilla odor for 60 seconds and rated perceived intensity every 10 seconds. Ratings dropped sharply after 20 seconds, but a brief (5-second) removal of the odor restored intensity ratings upon re-exposure. Which of the following best explains the sensory process described?

  1. Olfactory receptor neurons show decreased responsiveness during sustained stimulation, reducing afferent firing despite unchanged odor concentration (correct answer)
  2. The odorant molecules are converted into motor commands that fatigue respiratory muscles
  3. Adaptation occurs because the auditory pathway inhibits olfactory processing during continuous inhalation
  4. Perceived intensity drops because action potentials become smaller in amplitude with repeated firing

Explanation: This question assesses adaptation in olfactory sensory receptors and pathways. Olfactory receptor neurons exhibit sensory adaptation, decreasing responsiveness to sustained stimuli, which reduces perceived intensity over time. In the experiment, continuous vanilla odor leads to adaptation in receptors, causing ratings to drop, with brief removal allowing recovery. Choice A is correct as it describes decreased afferent firing due to adaptation despite constant odor, matching the restoration upon re-exposure. Choice D is incorrect because action potential amplitude does not change with repeated firing; frequency encodes intensity. In analogous questions, distinguish peripheral adaptation from central habituation. Verify if recovery occurs with stimulus interruption, indicating receptor-level processes.

Question 3

A study examined why rubbing the skin near a minor injury can reduce perceived pain. Participants received a brief pinprick to the forearm and rated pain intensity. In a second condition, they simultaneously rubbed the surrounding skin with a textured pad, producing strong touch sensation without changing the pinprick force. Pain ratings decreased during rubbing. Based on the scenario, which outcome is most consistent with the neural mechanism discussed?

  1. Pain decreases because touch information bypasses the central nervous system and directly relaxes muscles
  2. Nociceptors inhibit mechanoreceptors at the skin surface, reducing touch perception and therefore pain
  3. Pain decreases because rubbing converts nociceptive action potentials into graded potentials in the cortex
  4. Enhanced activity in touch afferents reduces transmission of nociceptive signals at an early relay by engaging inhibitory interneurons (correct answer)

Explanation: This question tests knowledge of neural pathways modulating pain through sensory interactions. Gate control theory posits that non-painful touch inputs can inhibit nociceptive signals via spinal interneurons, reducing pain perception. Here, rubbing activates touch afferents that engage inhibitory mechanisms at the spinal level, decreasing pain from the pinprick. Choice D is correct as it explains enhanced touch reducing nociception through inhibitory interneurons, consistent with lower pain ratings. Choice B is incorrect because nociceptors do not inhibit mechanoreceptors at the skin; inhibition occurs centrally. For similar scenarios, consider how multisensory inputs interact via central gating. Check if the mechanism involves peripheral transduction or central modulation.

Question 4

A study assessed temperature perception. A metal probe was applied to the skin at 20°C, 30°C, and 40°C. Participants reported “cold” at 20°C and “warm” at 40°C. At 30°C, reports depended strongly on the skin’s starting temperature: after pre-warming the skin, 30°C felt cool; after pre-cooling the skin, 30°C felt warm. Which of the following best explains the sensory process described?

  1. The effect occurs because sensory afferents carry signals from the brain to the skin to set perceived temperature
  2. Temperature is encoded only by absolute probe temperature because receptors cannot adapt
  3. The effect occurs because mechanoreceptors release hormones that alter skin temperature
  4. Thermal perception depends partly on relative change from baseline due to receptor adaptation and central comparison (correct answer)

Explanation: This question examines adaptation and relative coding in thermoreceptors and pathways. Temperature perception involves adaptation to baseline, making judgments relative to recent skin temperature rather than absolute. Pre-warming or cooling shifts adaptation, altering 30°C perception to cool or warm. Choice D is correct as it describes relative change detection via adaptation, explaining context-dependent reports. Choice B is incorrect because receptors do adapt, enabling relative perception. For thermal questions, consider adaptation's role in contrast. Verify if baseline shifts influence perception.

Question 5

A research vignette examines audition and neural transmission. Participants wear headphones that deliver a pure tone. When the tone’s intensity increases, participants report it as louder, but pitch is unchanged. The investigators emphasize that different perceptual qualities can be encoded by different features of the neural signal.

Which statement best supports the role of cochlear receptor transduction in this scenario?

  1. Loudness can be represented by increased firing rate and/or recruitment of more auditory nerve fibers as stimulus intensity increases, without changing frequency coding for pitch. (correct answer)
  2. Loudness increases because the auditory cortex sends stronger efferent action potentials into the cochlea that directly create larger sound waves.
  3. Pitch remains constant because olfactory receptors adapt slowly, preventing changes in frequency perception during sustained tones.
  4. Loudness increases because receptor potentials are transmitted chemically down the axon without action potentials, which preserves amplitude information.

Explanation: This question tests understanding of how different aspects of sound are encoded in the auditory system. Loudness perception corresponds to sound intensity and is encoded by increased firing rates in auditory nerve fibers and/or recruitment of additional fibers as basilar membrane displacement increases. Pitch perception corresponds to frequency and is encoded by which location along the basilar membrane vibrates most (place coding) and the timing of neural firing (temporal coding). These coding mechanisms are independent, allowing loudness to change without affecting pitch. The correct answer (A) accurately describes this rate/recruitment coding for intensity. Option B impossibly suggests efferent signals create sound waves, option C irrelevantly invokes olfactory receptors, and option D incorrectly describes chemical transmission replacing action potentials. When analyzing auditory coding, remember that frequency (pitch) and intensity (loudness) use different neural coding strategies.

Question 6

To examine sensory pathway directionality, a researcher electrically stimulated a sensory nerve in the wrist and recorded activity at a more proximal site along the same nerve. The participant reported a tingling sensation in the hand, not in the elbow. Which of the following best explains the sensory process described?

  1. The elbow was not perceived because sensory perception requires chemical diffusion of ions through blood vessels
  2. Stimulation caused motor efferents to send signals to the wrist, which were perceived as tingling in the hand
  3. Tingling was felt in the hand because sensory signals travel only from brain to periphery
  4. Perceived location reflects the brain’s interpretation of which peripheral receptors are normally served by the stimulated afferent pathway (correct answer)

Explanation: This question assesses labeled line theory in sensory pathways. Perception depends on the brain's interpretation of activated pathways' typical origins, not stimulation site. Wrist stimulation activates hand-serving afferents, perceived as hand tingling despite proximal recording. Choice D is correct as it explains interpretation based on pathway labeling. Choice C is incorrect because signals travel from periphery to brain. For pathway questions, consider central interpretation. Verify if sensation location matches pathway endpoint.

Question 7

Researchers examined why a steady, light touch becomes less noticeable over time. A small foam pad was placed on participants’ forearms with constant pressure. Initial reports described clear touch sensation, but after 2 minutes many participants reported that the pad felt much less salient, despite still being present. Which of the following best explains the sensory process described?

  1. Touch fades because synaptic transmission is unnecessary for sensation and therefore stops
  2. Touch fades because action potentials become chemically converted into hormones over time
  3. Touch fades because sensory neurons begin conducting signals from the brain to the skin
  4. Some touch receptors reduce firing during sustained stimulation, decreasing perceived intensity despite constant pressure (correct answer)

Explanation: This question tests adaptation in touch mechanoreceptors and pathways. Rapidly adapting receptors decrease firing to sustained stimuli, fading perception over time. Constant pad pressure leads to adaptation, reducing salience despite presence. Choice D is correct as it explains reduced firing in adapting receptors, matching reports. Choice C is incorrect because neurons conduct to, not from, the brain. For adaptation questions, identify phasic versus tonic receptors. Verify if sensation fades with constancy.

Question 8

A research team tested photoreceptor adaptation. Participants sat in a dim room for 20 minutes, then a faint light was flashed. Detection improved over time in the dark. In a separate condition, participants remained in bright light and detection of the same faint flash was poor. Which statement best supports the role of the sensory mechanism responsible for these results?

  1. Detection depends on olfactory receptor turnover, which is faster in dim conditions
  2. Dark adaptation occurs because motor neurons increase pupil size by releasing acetylcholine onto the retina
  3. Bright light improves detection by saturating photoreceptors, which increases firing variability and sensitivity
  4. Visual sensitivity increases in darkness due to receptor-level adaptation that increases responsiveness to low light (correct answer)

Explanation: This question assesses adaptation in visual photoreceptors and pathways. Dark adaptation enhances rod sensitivity to low light via biochemical changes, improving detection after bright exposure. Prolonged darkness allows adaptation, boosting faint flash detection, unlike bright conditions where saturation hinders it. Choice D is correct as it links receptor adaptation to increased low-light responsiveness, matching improved detection. Choice C is incorrect because saturation decreases, not increases, sensitivity. For visual adaptation questions, recall rod versus cone roles. Verify if time in darkness correlates with sensitivity gain.

Question 9

A study tested whether visual perception of motion can bias vestibular-based judgments. Participants sat still while viewing a large-screen video of forward motion (optic flow). Many reported a mild sensation of self-motion despite no actual movement. When the video was replaced with a static image, the sensation stopped. Which of the following best explains the sensory process described?

  1. The brain integrates visual cues with balance-related signals; strong visual motion cues can bias perceived self-motion (correct answer)
  2. Visual motion directly activates cochlear hair cells, producing a false sense of motion
  3. Perceived self-motion occurs because photoreceptors generate motor commands to the legs
  4. The sensation stops with a static image because action potentials cannot occur without physical body movement

Explanation: This question tests multisensory integration in vestibular and visual pathways. Visual optic flow can mimic self-motion, overriding vestibular cues when congruent. Video induces perceived motion via visual-vestibular integration, ceasing with static image. Choice A is correct as it describes integration biasing self-motion sense. Choice D is incorrect because potentials occur without movement. In vestibular questions, consider sensory conflicts. Check if cues align or conflict.

Question 10

A lab investigated lateral inhibition in touch perception. Two adjacent points on the fingertip were stimulated simultaneously with equal force. When the points were very close, participants often reported a single point; when slightly farther apart, they reliably reported two distinct points. The researchers proposed that inhibitory interactions sharpen spatial contrast. Which statement best supports the role of the proposed mechanism?

  1. Spatial contrast depends on endocrine signaling from sweat glands rather than neural processing
  2. Inhibition among sensory pathways reduces all touch signals equally, eliminating spatial information
  3. Two-point discrimination improves because motor neurons increase fingertip blood flow during stimulation
  4. Inhibitory interactions among neighboring sensory pathways can enhance contrast, making nearby stimuli more distinguishable (correct answer)

Explanation: This question evaluates lateral inhibition in somatosensory pathways. Lateral inhibition sharpens spatial contrast by suppressing adjacent neural activity, enhancing distinction between close stimuli. Close points feel as one due to overlapping fields, but inhibition aids separation at farther distances. Choice D is correct as it describes inhibition enhancing contrast, supporting better discrimination. Choice B is incorrect because inhibition sharpens, not eliminates, spatial info. For tactile questions, consider inhibitory networks. Verify if proximity affects perception via sharpening.

Question 11

To test taste transduction, participants sampled solutions that were identical except for sodium concentration. As sodium increased, perceived saltiness increased but eventually plateaued. When a sodium channel blocker was applied to the tongue surface, saltiness ratings decreased at low-to-moderate concentrations. Which of the following best explains the sensory process described?

  1. Salt taste depends on ion movement at receptor membranes that changes receptor potential and downstream afferent signaling (correct answer)
  2. Saltiness is encoded by photoreceptors that respond to ionic strength in the mouth
  3. The blocker decreases saltiness by preventing action potentials from forming in taste molecules themselves
  4. Saltiness decreases because blocking sodium channels increases neurotransmitter release onto taste receptors

Explanation: This question tests transduction in gustatory receptors and pathways. Salt taste involves sodium ions depolarizing receptors via channels, with blockers reducing this, lowering perceived saltiness. Increasing sodium boosts intensity until saturation; blocker impairs low/moderate detection. Choice A is correct as it explains ion-based receptor potential changes, matching plateau and reduction. Choice C is incorrect because molecules do not fire potentials; receptors do. In taste questions, identify ion or molecular transduction. Check if blockers target specific channels.

Question 12

Investigators examined why pressing on the side of the eye produces the perception of a moving light spot even in darkness. Participants gently pressed the outer corner of one closed eye and reported a brief “flash” in the opposite visual field. Which of the following best explains the sensory process described?

  1. Mechanical deformation of retinal receptors can trigger neural signaling that the brain interprets as light, even without photons (correct answer)
  2. Pressing the eye activates auditory hair cells, which are misrouted to visual cortex
  3. The flash occurs because motor commands to the eyelid are perceived as vision
  4. The flash occurs because action potentials in sensory neurons decrease in amplitude, producing a visual afterimage

Explanation: This question explores mechanotransduction in visual receptors and pathways. Mechanical pressure on the retina can depolarize photoreceptors, generating signals interpreted as light (phosphenes) without actual photons. Pressing the eye deforms receptors, triggering neural activity perceived as a flash in the opposite field. Choice A is correct as it explains mechanical triggering of signaling, consistent with darkness reports. Choice B is incorrect because it involves auditory, not visual, receptors. In related questions, identify if perception arises from receptor activation mode. Check if stimulus bypasses typical transduction (e.g., light).

Question 13

Researchers tested how mechanoreceptors transduce vibration into neural signals. Participants placed an index finger on a plate delivering either low-frequency flutter (30 Hz) or high-frequency vibration (250 Hz) at equal skin displacement. After a topical anesthetic that reduces action potential generation in peripheral afferents, detection thresholds increased more for 30 Hz than for 250 Hz, even though participants reported intact temperature sensation. Which of the following best explains the sensory process described?

  1. High-frequency vibration is detected primarily by nociceptors that are resistant to local anesthetics
  2. Low-frequency flutter relies more on rapidly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptors whose afferent firing is reduced by impaired action potential generation (correct answer)
  3. The anesthetic increases neurotransmitter release at the neuromuscular junction, masking 250 Hz vibration
  4. Vibration detection occurs when motor efferents stimulate skin receptors to depolarize

Explanation: This question tests understanding of sensory receptors and neural pathways involved in vibration detection. Cutaneous mechanoreceptors vary in adaptation rates and depth, with rapidly adapting types like Meissner's corpuscles sensitive to low-frequency flutter and Pacinian corpuscles to high-frequency vibration. In this study, the topical anesthetic impairs action potential generation in superficial afferents, disproportionately affecting low-frequency detection reliant on rapidly adapting receptors. Choice B is correct because it accurately describes how impaired action potentials reduce firing in these receptors for 30 Hz stimuli more than for 250 Hz. Choice A is incorrect as high-frequency vibration is detected by Pacinian corpuscles, not nociceptors, which are for pain and temperature. To reason through similar questions, identify the specific receptor type linked to the stimulus frequency. Always verify if the intervention targets superficial versus deep receptors or adaptation properties.

Question 14

A clinical study compared patients with peripheral neuropathy affecting large-diameter sensory fibers to matched controls. Patients showed reduced ability to detect light touch and vibration in the feet but could still detect painful pinprick. Based on the scenario, which outcome is most consistent with the neural mechanism discussed?

  1. Vibration is preserved because it is carried mainly by autonomic efferents rather than sensory afferents
  2. Loss of large fibers would primarily eliminate motor output, preventing pain perception
  3. Pinprick remains detectable because mechanoreceptors transduce pain more efficiently than nociceptors
  4. Selective impairment of large, myelinated afferents would reduce mechanosensory input while sparing many small-fiber nociceptive inputs (correct answer)

Explanation: This question probes selective impairment in sensory fiber types and pathways. Large myelinated fibers carry touch and vibration, while small unmyelinated fibers handle pain and temperature, with neuropathy often affecting large fibers first. Patients lose touch/vibration detection but retain pinprick sensation due to spared small-fiber nociceptors. Choice D is correct as it explains reduced mechanosensory input with preserved nociception, aligning with the findings. Choice C is incorrect because mechanoreceptors do not transduce pain; nociceptors do. For comparable clinical scenarios, identify fiber types by modality. Verify if symptoms match diameter-based vulnerabilities.

Question 15

A lab tested the effect of expectation on pain perception. Participants received identical mild heat stimuli on the forearm. When told the stimulus would be “very painful,” participants rated it as more painful than when told it would be “barely noticeable,” despite identical temperatures. Which of the following best explains the sensory process described?

  1. Top-down cognitive factors can modulate sensory processing and subjective perception without changing peripheral stimulus intensity (correct answer)
  2. Expectations change the physical temperature of the stimulus at the skin through endocrine release
  3. Expectations prevent nociceptors from transducing heat, so the brain invents pain ratings
  4. The effect occurs because heat information travels from the brain to the skin via sensory afferents

Explanation: This question explores top-down modulation in pain pathways. Expectations influence central processing, altering subjective pain without changing peripheral input. 'Painful' labeling increases ratings via cognitive modulation, despite identical heat. Choice A is correct as it describes modulation of perception, explaining rating differences. Choice C is incorrect because expectations do not prevent transduction. In perception questions, consider cognitive influences. Check if physical stimulus is constant.

Question 16

In a study of sensory thresholds, participants received increasing pressure on the skin until they reported discomfort. After applying a topical capsaicin cream that produces burning sensation, the pressure required to report discomfort decreased, even though the applied pressure was unchanged across trials. Which of the following best explains the sensory process described?

  1. Capsaicin increases motor neuron firing, which is interpreted as pressure discomfort
  2. Capsaicin blocks mechanoreceptors, so pressure signals cannot reach the brain and are felt as pain
  3. Sensitization of pain pathways can lower the threshold for perceiving discomfort from additional stimuli (correct answer)
  4. Pressure discomfort decreases because capsaicin reduces synaptic transmission by eliminating neurotransmitters

Explanation: This question examines sensitization in nociceptive pathways. Capsaicin activates and sensitizes pain fibers, lowering thresholds for other stimuli like pressure. Post-capsaicin, discomfort occurs at lower pressure due to heightened pathway sensitivity. Choice C is correct as it describes lowered thresholds, explaining decreased pressure needed. Choice D is incorrect because capsaicin sensitizes, not reduces, transmission. In pain questions, consider hyperalgesia mechanisms. Check if prior stimuli alter thresholds.

Question 17

A clinical trial assessed patients taking an antihistamine that commonly causes drowsiness. Participants showed slower reaction times to sudden visual flashes but unchanged ability to detect the flashes when asked without time pressure. The investigators suggested slowed central processing rather than impaired retinal transduction. Based on the scenario, which outcome is most consistent with the neural mechanism discussed?

  1. Slower reaction time indicates that photoreceptors are generating smaller action potentials
  2. If retinal transduction is impaired, reaction time should improve because fewer signals reach the brain
  3. Unchanged detection implies that no neural signaling occurs; perception must be hormonal
  4. If central processing is slowed, detection accuracy can remain intact while response initiation is delayed (correct answer)

Explanation: This question probes central versus peripheral processing in visual pathways. Central slowing delays responses but spares detection if transduction is intact. Antihistamine affects CNS, slowing reactions without impairing retinal accuracy. Choice D is correct as it explains intact detection with delayed response, consistent with central mechanism. Choice B is incorrect because impaired transduction would worsen, not improve, time. For drug effect questions, distinguish sensory stages. Verify if accuracy holds without time pressure.

Question 18

Researchers studied auditory localization using brief clicks presented through headphones with controlled timing differences between ears. When the click arrived slightly earlier to the right ear, participants perceived the sound as coming from the right. Which of the following best explains the sensory process described?

  1. Localization occurs because motor efferents send commands to the cochlea indicating where the sound is located
  2. Sound direction is determined primarily by taste receptor activation on the tongue
  3. Earlier arrival to one ear causes higher action potential amplitude, which encodes direction
  4. Small interaural timing differences provide a cue used by the nervous system to infer sound source direction (correct answer)

Explanation: This question assesses binaural cues in auditory localization pathways. Interaural time differences allow the brain to compute sound direction based on arrival timing. Earlier right-ear arrival signals right-side source via neural comparators. Choice D is correct as it explains timing cues inferring direction. Choice C is incorrect because timing, not amplitude, primarily encodes for low frequencies. For localization questions, recall time and level differences. Verify if cues are interaural.

Question 19

A study examined how attention modulates sensory processing. Participants performed a difficult visual search task while faint tones were played in the background. Compared with a condition where participants passively viewed a fixation point, participants in the visual search condition later reported noticing fewer tones. Which of the following best explains the sensory process described?

  1. Reduced tone noticing occurs because action potentials cannot be generated when two senses are stimulated simultaneously
  2. Visual attention prevents the cochlea from transducing sound waves into neural signals
  3. Tones are not noticed because auditory efferents carry sound information away from the brain
  4. Limited attentional resources can reduce conscious access to concurrent sensory inputs despite ongoing receptor transduction (correct answer)

Explanation: This question assesses attention's modulation of sensory processing in neural pathways. Attention filters inputs, reducing awareness of unattended stimuli despite intact transduction. Visual task diverts resources, decreasing tone noticing without stopping cochlear processing. Choice D is correct as it describes limited resources reducing access, explaining fewer reports. Choice B is incorrect because attention does not prevent transduction. For attention questions, differentiate peripheral from central effects. Verify if detection changes with task demand.

Question 20

A lab compared perception of pitch for two tones: 200 Hz and 2000 Hz. Participants could easily distinguish them. The investigators emphasized that pitch perception depends on how auditory receptors represent frequency, not intensity. Which statement best supports the role of the sensory mechanism responsible for pitch discrimination?

  1. Different sound frequencies produce distinct patterns of activation in auditory receptors and afferents that the brain interprets as pitch (correct answer)
  2. Pitch is determined by the number of photons hitting the retina during sound presentation
  3. Pitch is encoded only by action potential amplitude, which varies with frequency
  4. Pitch discrimination requires motor efferents to contract middle-ear muscles in a frequency-specific way

Explanation: This question evaluates frequency coding in auditory receptors and pathways. Place theory holds that different frequencies activate specific basilar membrane regions, enabling pitch discrimination. 200 Hz and 2000 Hz stimulate distinct areas, allowing easy distinction independent of intensity. Choice A is correct as it describes frequency-specific activation patterns interpreted as pitch. Choice C is incorrect because amplitude does not encode frequency; place and timing do. In auditory questions, recall tonotopic organization. Check if discrimination relies on frequency versus intensity.