All questions
Question 1
Your teacher says: '请和你的同伴练习对话。先问他的名字,再问他的年龄。' (Qǐng hé nǐ de tóngbàn liànxí duìhuà. Xiān wèn tā de míngzi, zài wèn tā de niánlíng.)
Based on the teacher's direction above, which sequence correctly describes what you should do during this partner task?
- Ask your partner's age first, then ask for their name, completing both questions before switching roles.
- Ask your partner's name first, then ask their age, following the order the teacher specified. (correct answer)
- Ask your partner's name and age at the same time in one sentence, since the teacher wants efficiency in the dialogue.
- Listen while your partner asks you questions first, then respond with your own name and age when it is your turn.
Explanation: When reading instructions in Mandarin, pay close attention to sequence words — they carry precise meaning and directly control what action you should take and in what order.
The teacher's sentence uses two key adverbs: 先 (xiān), meaning "first," and 再 (zài), meaning "then/next." The instruction breaks down as: 先问他的名字 — first ask their name — 再问他的年龄 — then ask their age. This gives you an explicit, ordered sequence: name before age. Answer B follows this exactly, making it correct.
Answer A reverses the order, asking for age first and name second. This directly contradicts the teacher's use of 先 and 再, which establish a specific priority. Getting the sequence backward shows a misreading of those critical time-order words.
Answer C suggests combining both questions into one sentence for efficiency. Nothing in the teacher's instruction implies simultaneous questioning — in fact, 先...再... specifically implies two separate, sequential steps. Merging them ignores the structure of the direction entirely.
Answer D has you listening to your partner first rather than asking questions. While partner dialogues do involve turn-taking, the teacher's instruction clearly begins with 你 (you) as the one asking — the instruction is directed at what you should initiate, not how your partner should start.
As a study tip, always underline or mentally flag time-sequence words like 先, 再, 然后 (ránhòu — "after that"), and 最后 (zuìhòu — "finally") when reading Mandarin instructions. These words are frequently tested because they define the order of actions precisely.
Question 2
Your teacher gives the following direction: '请你用中文问你的同伴三个问题,但是不能问关于家庭的问题。' (Qǐng nǐ yòng Zhōngwén wèn nǐ de tóngbàn sān gè wèntí, dànshì bù néng wèn guānyú jiātíng de wèntí.)
A student asks their partner: (1) 你喜欢什么运动?(2) 你有几个兄弟姐妹?(3) 你的生日是几月几号? Which statement best evaluates whether this student followed the teacher's direction?
- The student followed the direction correctly because all three questions are in Chinese and there are exactly three questions total.
- The student did not follow the direction because two of the three questions are about family topics, violating the restriction.
- The student did not follow the direction because question two asks about siblings, which is a family-related topic, breaking the rule. (correct answer)
- The student did not follow the direction because asking about birthdays is considered personal, and personal questions are restricted just like family questions.
Explanation: When evaluating whether a student followed a teacher's direction, you need to check every condition in the instruction against every action taken. The teacher's direction here has two requirements: ask three questions in Chinese, AND do not ask about family topics (家庭, jiātíng).
Let's examine each question the student asked. Question (1) 你喜欢什么运动?asks about favorite sports — perfectly fine. Question (2) 你有几个兄弟姐妹?asks "How many siblings do you have?" — 兄弟姐妹 (xiōngdì jiěmèi) literally means brothers and sisters, which is clearly a family-related topic. Question (3) 你的生日是几月几号?asks about a birthday — this is personal information, not a family topic. So the student broke the rule with exactly one question: question two.
This confirms C is correct. The student violated the restriction specifically because question two asks about siblings, a direct family topic.
Choice A is wrong because it only checks the first condition (three questions in Chinese) and completely ignores the second condition (no family topics). Always verify all parts of a multi-part instruction. Choice B is wrong because it claims two questions violate the family restriction — but only question two does. The birthday question (3) is not a family topic, so this count is inaccurate. Choice D is wrong because it invents a restriction that was never stated. The teacher only prohibited family questions, not personal questions generally — don't add rules that aren't there.
Your strategy: when a direction contains a restriction, systematically check each action against that restriction one by one, and never assume extra rules beyond what's explicitly stated.
Question 3
The teacher says: '现在请听你的同伴介绍自己,然后用中文重复他说的两件事。' (Xiànzài qǐng tīng nǐ de tóngbàn jièshào zìjǐ, rán hòu yòng Zhōngwén chóngfù tā shuō de liǎng jiàn shì.)
Your partner says: '我叫王芳。我是北京人。我喜欢音乐。我有一只猫。' After listening, which response correctly fulfills the teacher's direction?
- Saying '她叫王芳,她是北京人,她喜欢音乐,她有一只猫' to report everything your partner said as completely as possible.
- Saying '她叫王芳,她喜欢音乐' or any other two facts your partner mentioned, stated in Chinese with the correct pronoun shift. (correct answer)
- Saying '我叫王芳,我是北京人' using the exact words your partner used without shifting pronouns, in order to repeat accurately.
- Asking your partner to repeat themselves once more so you can memorize all four facts before responding in Chinese.
Explanation: When you see a question involving following spoken instructions in Mandarin, always break it into two layers: what the instruction says to do, and how to do it correctly in Chinese. The teacher's direction, '用中文重复他说的两件事' (repeat two things he said in Chinese), is the key phrase — liǎng jiàn shì means exactly two facts, not all of them.
Answer B is correct because it fulfills both requirements precisely. It selects any two facts from what your partner said, states them in Chinese, and correctly shifts the pronoun from 我 (wǒ, "I") to 她 (tā, "she"), since you are now reporting what someone else said. This pronoun shift is essential in reported speech — you are no longer the speaker, so the first-person pronoun must change.
Answer A fails because it reports all four facts your partner mentioned, directly violating the instruction to repeat only two things. Even though the Chinese is grammatically correct, following instructions is part of the task.
Answer C is a classic trap: it repeats the partner's exact words, including 我, without shifting the pronoun to 她. In Mandarin reported speech, keeping 我 makes it sound like you are making those claims about yourself — a significant error in meaning and pragmatic accuracy.
Answer D fails entirely because the task requires you to listen and respond, not request a repetition. Asking your partner to repeat themselves shows you didn't complete the listening task as directed.
Strategy tip: On language exams, always read instructions carefully for quantity words like 两件 ("two things") — they're often the deciding factor between a correct and incorrect response.
Question 4
During class, the teacher says: '请你们用中文互相问今天的日期和天气。每人问一个问题。' (Qǐng nǐmen yòng Zhōngwén hùxiāng wèn jīntiān de rìqī hé tiānqì. Měi rén wèn yī gè wèntí.)
Student A asks: '今天是几月几号?' Student B then asks: '今天天气怎么样?然后,今天几号?' Which best describes whether both students followed the teacher's direction?
- Both students followed the direction correctly because together they covered both the date and weather topics the teacher specified.
- Only Student A followed the direction; Student B asked two questions instead of the required one question per person. (correct answer)
- Neither student followed the direction because the teacher wanted them to ask about both date and weather in a single question.
- Only Student B followed the direction because Student B covered both topics, while Student A only asked about one topic.
Explanation: When a teacher gives instructions with specific requirements, every word matters — especially quantifiers like 每人 (měi rén, "each person") and 一个 (yī gè, "one"). This question tests whether you can carefully match each student's behavior against the teacher's exact directions.
The teacher said: ask each other questions about today's date AND weather, with each person asking one question. Student A asked '今天是几月几号?' — one question about the date. That's perfectly compliant: one question per the rule. Student B, however, asked '今天天气怎么样?然后,今天几号?' — that's two separate questions joined by 然后 (then). Student B violated the 每人问一个问题 rule by asking two questions. So B is correct: only Student A followed the direction.
Choice A is tempting because together the students did cover both topics, but the teacher's instruction wasn't just about covering topics — it was also about each person asking only one question. Reading instructions carelessly is exactly the trap A sets.
Choice C is wrong because it misreads the instruction. The teacher never said each person must cover both topics in one question — she said the group should discuss both topics, with each person contributing one question. Student A's single-topic question is perfectly fine.
Choice D is backwards. Student B asked two questions, directly breaking the one-question rule, so B did not follow the direction regardless of topic coverage.
Study tip: In listening/reading comprehension, always identify every condition in an instruction (topic + quantity + format) and check each student's response against all conditions, not just one.
Question 5
Your teacher says: '请和你的同伴角色扮演:一个人是老师,一个人是学生。学生要问老师两个关于作业的问题。' (Qǐng hé nǐ de tóngbàn juésè bànyǎn: yī gè rén shì lǎoshī, yī gè rén shì xuésheng. Xuésheng yào wèn lǎoshī liǎng gè guānyú zuòyè de wèntí.)
In the role-play, the student asks: '老师,作业什么时候交?' The teacher responds: '明天交。' The student then says: '好的,谢谢老师!' and the pair stops. What is the most accurate assessment of their performance?
- They did not complete the task because the student only asked one homework question instead of the required two questions. (correct answer)
- They completed the task correctly because the student asked a question about homework and the teacher answered appropriately in the role-play.
- They did not complete the task because the student should have been the teacher and the classmate should have been the student.
- They completed the task correctly because both partners spoke during the role-play and used Chinese throughout the activity.
Explanation: When evaluating a role-play task, your first job is to check whether the specific instructions were fully followed — not just whether the participants did something related to the task.
The teacher's instructions were clear: '学生要问老师两个关于作业的问题' — the student must ask two questions about homework. In the role-play, the student only asked one question ('作业什么时候交?') before saying goodbye and stopping. Since only one of the two required questions was asked, the task was incomplete. This makes A the correct assessment.
B is tempting because the exchange feels natural and polite — the student asked a homework question, the teacher answered, and they used appropriate Chinese. However, "completing a task" means meeting all stated requirements, not just some of them. Missing the second question is a meaningful gap, not a minor detail.
C is simply factually wrong. The instructions said one person plays the teacher and one plays the student — there's no indication the roles were assigned incorrectly. Nothing in the scenario suggests the students switched who should be who.
D focuses on surface-level participation: both students spoke and used Chinese. While those are positive signs, they don't address task completion. You can speak fluently in Chinese and still fail to meet the task's specific requirements.
A useful strategy: when a task prompt contains a specific number (两个问题, 三个原因, etc.), always count whether that number was actually reached before judging if the task was completed successfully.
Question 6
Your teacher says: '请你和同伴用中文讨论你们最喜欢的食物。每个人说两句话,不能用英文。' (Qǐng nǐ hé tóngbàn yòng Zhōngwén tǎolùn nǐmen zuì xǐhuān de shíwù. Měi gè rén shuō liǎng jù huà, bù néng yòng Yīngwén.)
Student A says: '我最喜欢吃饺子。饺子很好吃!' Student B says: '我喜欢pizza,因为 it is very cheesy and delicious.' Which evaluation is most accurate?
- Both students followed the direction correctly because each person spoke two sentences and discussed their favorite food as instructed.
- Neither student followed the direction because discussing pizza is not appropriate since it is not a Chinese food item.
- Only Student B followed the direction fully; Student A's sentences were too simple and did not constitute a real discussion of food.
- Only Student A followed the direction fully; Student B violated the no-English rule by mixing English words and phrases into their response. (correct answer)
Explanation: When evaluating whether students followed a teacher's directions, you need to check every requirement listed — not just some of them. Here, the teacher gave three clear rules: use Chinese (中文), discuss your favorite food, and each person says two sentences. A response fails if it breaks any of these rules, even if it meets the others.
Student A says "我最喜欢吃饺子。饺子很好吃!" — two complete sentences, entirely in Chinese, about their favorite food. That's a perfect match with all three requirements. Student B, however, says "我喜欢pizza,因为 it is very cheesy and delicious." The teacher explicitly said 不能用英文 (bù néng yòng Yīngwén — "cannot use English"), yet Student B mixes in English words ("pizza," "it is very cheesy and delicious"). This is a clear violation, making D the correct answer: only Student A followed all directions fully.
Looking at the wrong choices: A is tempting because both students did speak two sentences about food, but it ignores Student B's English — you must check all conditions, not just some. B is incorrect because the directions say nothing about food needing to be Chinese cuisine; pizza is a valid food topic, so discussing it is perfectly fine. C is wrong because simplicity isn't a stated requirement — Student A's sentences are grammatically appropriate and fulfill everything asked. Penalizing someone for being concise when the directions don't require complexity is a trap.
Your strategy: always make a checklist of every requirement in the instructions and verify each student's response against all of them before choosing your answer.
Question 7
The teacher says: '请大家站起来,在教室里走动,找三个不同的同学,问他们今天心情怎么样,然后坐下来。' (Qǐng dàjiā zhànqǐlái, zài jiàoshì lǐ zǒudòng, zhǎo sān gè bùtóng de tóngxué, wèn tāmen jīntiān xīnqíng zěnmeyàng, rán hòu zuò xiàlái.)
A student stands up, asks two classmates '你今天心情怎么样?', receives their answers, and then sits back down. What should this student do to correctly complete the teacher's direction?
- The student should stand up again, find one more classmate, ask them the same question about their mood, and then sit down again. (correct answer)
- The student should remain seated and report the two classmates' moods to the teacher, since sitting down means the activity has ended.
- The student should stand up again and ask the same two classmates a follow-up question about why they feel that way today.
- The student should stand up again and ask one of the same two classmates two additional mood questions to compensate for missing the third person.
Explanation: When following multi-step instructions in Mandarin, you need to track each specific requirement carefully — this question tests whether you can parse a sequential command and identify what remains incomplete.
The teacher's instruction breaks into clear steps: (1) stand up, (2) walk around the classroom, (3) find three different classmates (三个不同的同学), (4) ask each one about their mood today, and (5) sit down. The critical word is 三个 — three. The student only completed two of the three required conversations before sitting down, meaning the task is unfinished.
Answer A is correct because the student must stand up again, find one more classmate (the missing third person), ask the mood question, and then sit down properly. This satisfies all conditions of the original instruction.
Answer B is wrong because sitting down early doesn't end the activity — it just means the student stopped prematurely. Reporting back to the teacher was never part of the instruction.
Answer C is wrong because the instruction only asks about mood (心情怎么样), not follow-up questions about why they feel that way. Asking the same two classmates again also fails to meet the "three different classmates" requirement.
Answer D is wrong because asking one classmate two additional questions doesn't fulfill 三个不同的同学 — the instruction requires three different people, not three questions to fewer people. Quantity of questions cannot substitute for quantity of classmates.
When reading Mandarin instructions on this exam, always underline quantity words like 三个, 两次, or 几个 — they almost always hold the key to what's complete versus incomplete.
Question 8
Your teacher says: '请你用中文告诉你的同伴你明天的计划。说三件事,但是不要说去哪里,只说做什么。' (Qǐng nǐ yòng Zhōngwén gàosù nǐ de tóngbàn nǐ míngtiān de jìhuà. Shuō sān jiàn shì, dànshì bù yào shuō qù nǎlǐ, zhǐ shuō zuò shénme.)
A student says to their partner: '明天我要去图书馆学习,去健身房锻炼,还有做饭。' Which is the most accurate assessment of whether this student followed the teacher's direction?
- The student followed the direction correctly because three plans were mentioned and all of them are stated in Chinese as required.
- The student followed the direction correctly because mentioning locations like 图书馆 and 健身房 simply provides helpful context and does not break the rule about activities.
- The student did not follow the direction because only two activities were described — studying and exercising — and cooking is not a real plan.
- The student did not fully follow the direction because two of the three plans include a location, which the teacher said not to mention. (correct answer)
Explanation: When a teacher gives instructions in Chinese, you need to listen carefully for both what to do and what NOT to do. Here, the teacher said zhǐ shuō zuò shénme (只说做什么) — "only say what you're doing" — and explicitly prohibited mentioning locations (bù yào shuō qù nǎlǐ, 不要说去哪里).
Now look at the student's response: '明天我要去图书馆学习,去健身房锻炼,还有做饭。' Two of the three plans begin with qù + location (去图书馆, 去健身房), which directly violates the teacher's rule. The student should have said something like '明天我要学习,锻炼,还有做饭。' The third activity, 做饭, actually follows the instruction correctly — it states only the action. So the student partially followed the direction but not fully, making D the correct answer.
A is wrong because it only checks that three plans were mentioned in Chinese — it ignores the specific restriction about locations, which the student clearly violated. B is a tempting trap: it sounds reasonable to think locations are "just context," but the teacher's instruction was explicit. Rationalizing away a direct rule is a comprehension error, not a valid interpretation. C is wrong because it misreads the student's response — three activities were mentioned (studying, exercising, cooking), and there's no basis for saying cooking isn't a "real" plan.
A useful habit: when answering comprehension questions about instructions, mentally checklist every condition the speaker sets — not just the main task, but any restrictions or limitations stated alongside it.
Question 9
During a group activity, your teacher says: '请三个人一组,每个人说一个爱好。说完以后,告诉全班你们组的爱好。' (Qǐng sān gè rén yī zǔ, měi gè rén shuō yī gè àihào. Shuō wán yǐhòu, gàosù quán bān nǐmen zǔ de àihào.)
A student named Li Ming is in a group with two classmates. After everyone in the group has shared, what is Li Ming's group expected to do next according to the teacher's direction?
- Each member of the group takes turns walking to the front and individually tells the class their own personal hobby.
- The group selects one hobby that everyone agrees on and reports only that single hobby to the class.
- The group reports all three hobbies that were shared within the group to the entire class. (correct answer)
- The group writes down each person's hobby on paper and submits it to the teacher instead of speaking aloud.
Explanation: When reading Chinese instructions in a classroom setting, pay close attention to the sequence of actions signaled by time-order phrases like 说完以后 (shuō wán yǐhòu, "after finishing speaking"). These phrases tell you that one action must be completed before the next begins, and they're key to understanding multi-step directions.
The teacher's instruction breaks into two clear parts: first, each person in the group shares one hobby ("每个人说一个爱好"), meaning three hobbies are shared in total within the group. Then, after that is done ("说完以后"), the group reports those hobbies to the whole class ("告诉全班你们组的爱好"). The phrase 你们组的爱好 means "your group's hobbies" — plural, belonging to the whole group. This confirms that C is correct: the group reports all three hobbies that were shared.
A is wrong because the instruction calls for the group to report together ("告诉全班"), not for each individual to walk up separately and speak independently. B is a tempting trap — it assumes the group must narrow down to one agreed-upon hobby, but nothing in the Chinese text says to choose or eliminate any hobbies. D is entirely unsupported; there is no mention of writing anything down or submitting anything to the teacher.
As a study tip, watch for the difference between 每个人 ("each person") and 你们组 ("your group") in Chinese directions — this shift in subject signals a change in who is performing the next action, which often determines the correct answer.
Question 10
The teacher gives this direction: '请你找一个没有说过话的同学,用中文自我介绍。说你的名字、你来自哪里,还有你学中文多久了。' (Qǐng nǐ zhǎo yī gè méiyǒu shuōguò huà de tóngxué, yòng Zhōngwén zìwǒ jièshào. Shuō nǐ de míngzi, nǐ lái zì nǎlǐ, hái yǒu nǐ xué Zhōngwén duō jiǔ le.)
A student walks up to a classmate they already spoke with earlier in class and says: '你好!我叫李明。我来自上海。我学中文学了一年了。' Which part of the teacher's direction did this student fail to follow?
- The student failed to follow the direction because the self-introduction did not include where they are from, which was one of the required elements.
- The student failed to follow the direction because the self-introduction was too short and did not use enough Chinese vocabulary.
- The student failed to follow the direction because they approached a classmate they had already spoken with, rather than finding a new partner. (correct answer)
- The student failed to follow the direction because they should have asked the classmate questions rather than only introducing themselves.
Explanation: When reading comprehension questions involve following directions in Mandarin, your job is to check every condition in the instruction — not just whether the content of the response is correct, but also whether the student followed the procedural rules.
The teacher's direction contains a critical condition right at the start: 找一个没有说过话的同学 — "find a classmate you have not spoken with before." This means the student must seek out someone new. The student in the scenario then produces a perfectly formed self-introduction: they give their name (我叫李明), their hometown (我来自上海), and how long they've studied Chinese (我学中文学了一年了). The content is flawless. The failure is that they approached someone they had already spoken with, directly violating that opening condition. That makes C the correct answer.
A is incorrect because the student did include where they are from — 我来自上海 clearly satisfies that requirement. This choice tries to trick you into second-guessing the content when the content was actually fine.
B is a distractor with no basis in the directions. The teacher never specified a minimum length or vocabulary count, so "too short" is irrelevant here.
D is incorrect because the teacher explicitly asked for a 自我介绍 (self-introduction), not an interview or conversation. The student was right to introduce themselves rather than ask questions.
Strategy tip: On directions-based questions, annotate every condition in the instructions before evaluating the student's response — content, form, and procedural rules. Exam writers often make the content correct precisely to distract you from a violated procedural step.