Linear Algebra Quiz: Cramers Rule
18 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Cramers RuleQuestion 1 of 18

In applying Cramer's rule to a 3×33 \times 3 linear system Ax=bA\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{b}, it is found that the determinant of the coefficient matrix, det(A)\det(A), is zero. However, the determinant of the matrix A1A_1, formed by replacing the first column of AA with b\mathbf{b}, is non-zero. What can be concluded about the solution set of the system?

The system has a unique solution.
The system has no solution.
The system has infinitely many solutions.
The variable x1x_1 must be zero, but no conclusion can be drawn about other variables.
← Back to quizzes

Linear Algebra Quiz

Linear Algebra Quiz: Cramers Rule

Practice Cramers Rule in Linear Algebra with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Cramers Rule, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Linear Algebra.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

In applying Cramer's rule to a 3×33 \times 3 linear system Ax=bA\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{b}, it is found that the determinant of the coefficient matrix, det(A)\det(A), is zero. However, the determinant of the matrix A1A_1, formed by replacing the first column of AA with b\mathbf{b}, is non-zero. What can be concluded about the solution set of the system?

  1. The system has a unique solution.
  2. The system has no solution. (correct answer)
  3. The system has infinitely many solutions.
  4. The variable x1x_1 must be zero, but no conclusion can be drawn about other variables.
Explanation: Cramer's rule states that for a system Ax=bA\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{b}, the solution for a variable xix_i is given by xi=det(Ai)det(A)x_i = \frac{\det(A_i)}{\det(A)}. This rule is only applicable if det(A)0\det(A) \neq 0. If det(A)=0\det(A) = 0, the system does not have a unique solution. Furthermore, if det(A)=0\det(A) = 0 and at least one numerator determinant det(Ai)\det(A_i) is non-zero, the system is inconsistent, meaning it has no solution. This case corresponds to an undefined expression of the form (non-zero)/0.

Question 2

Consider the linear system:

{2x3y+z=5x+y2z=1x+2y+z=0\begin{cases} 2x - 3y + z = 5 \\ x + y - 2z = -1 \\ -x + 2y + z = 0 \end{cases}

Using Cramer's Rule, which of the following expressions correctly represents the solution for yy?

  1. y=det(531112021)det(231112121)y = \frac{\det \begin{pmatrix} 5 & -3 & 1 \\ -1 & 1 & -2 \\ 0 & 2 & 1 \end{pmatrix}}{\det \begin{pmatrix} 2 & -3 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & -2 \\ -1 & 2 & 1 \end{pmatrix}}
  2. y=det(251112101)det(231112121)y = \frac{\det \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 5 & 1 \\ 1 & -1 & -2 \\ -1 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}}{\det \begin{pmatrix} 2 & -3 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & -2 \\ -1 & 2 & 1 \end{pmatrix}} (correct answer)
  3. y=det(235111120)det(231112121)y = \frac{\det \begin{pmatrix} 2 & -3 & 5 \\ 1 & 1 & -1 \\ -1 & 2 & 0 \end{pmatrix}}{\det \begin{pmatrix} 2 & -3 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & -2 \\ -1 & 2 & 1 \end{pmatrix}}
  4. y=det(231112121)det(251112101)y = \frac{\det \begin{pmatrix} 2 & -3 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & -2 \\ -1 & 2 & 1 \end{pmatrix}}{\det \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 5 & 1 \\ 1 & -1 & -2 \\ -1 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}}
Explanation: To solve for the variable yy using Cramer's rule, the numerator is the determinant of the matrix formed by replacing the yy-coefficient column (the second column) with the constant vector b=(510)\mathbf{b} = \begin{pmatrix} 5 \\ -1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}. The denominator is the determinant of the original coefficient matrix. Choice B correctly shows the second column of the coefficient matrix replaced by the constant vector in the numerator's determinant.

Question 3

In solving a system of two linear equations for variables xx and yy using Cramer's rule, the following determinants are computed: D=det(2513)D = \det \begin{pmatrix} 2 & -5 \\ 1 & 3 \end{pmatrix}, Dx=det(8523)D_x = \det \begin{pmatrix} 8 & -5 \\ -2 & 3 \end{pmatrix}, and Dy=det(2812)D_y = \det \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 8 \\ 1 & -2 \end{pmatrix}. What is the solution (x,y)(x, y) to the system?

  1. (14/1114/11, 12/11-12/11) (correct answer)
  2. (12/11-12/11, 14/1114/11)
  3. (1414, 12-12)
  4. (11/1411/14, 11/12-11/12)
Explanation: First, we evaluate each determinant: D=(2)(3)(5)(1)=6+5=11D = (2)(3) - (-5)(1) = 6 + 5 = 11. Dx=(8)(3)(5)(2)=2410=14D_x = (8)(3) - (-5)(-2) = 24 - 10 = 14. Dy=(2)(2)(8)(1)=48=12D_y = (2)(-2) - (8)(1) = -4 - 8 = -12. According to Cramer's rule, x=DxDx = \frac{D_x}{D} and y=DyDy = \frac{D_y}{D}. Thus, x=1411x = \frac{14}{11} and y=1211y = \frac{-12}{11}. The solution is (14/11,12/11)(14/11, -12/11).

Question 4

A system of two linear equations, a1x+b1y=c1a_1x + b_1y = c_1 and a2x+b2y=c2a_2x + b_2y = c_2, is represented graphically by two distinct lines. If the determinant of the coefficient matrix (a1b1a2b2)\begin{pmatrix} a_1 & b_1 \\ a_2 & b_2 \end{pmatrix} is zero, what must be true about the two lines?

  1. The lines are parallel. (correct answer)
  2. The lines are coincident.
  3. The lines are perpendicular.
  4. The lines intersect at the origin.
Explanation: If the determinant of the coefficient matrix is zero, the system does not have a unique solution. Geometrically, for a system of two linear equations in two variables, this means the lines are either parallel or coincident. Since the problem states that the lines are 'distinct', they cannot be coincident. Therefore, the lines must be parallel.

Question 5

When attempting to solve a linear system Ax=bA\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{b} using Cramer's rule, a student finds that det(A)=0\det(A) = 0 and also that det(Ai)=0\det(A_i) = 0 for every variable xix_i. What is the correct conclusion to draw about the system?

  1. The system has no solution.
  2. The only solution is the trivial solution x=0\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{0}.
  3. The system has infinitely many solutions. (correct answer)
  4. Cramer's rule is inapplicable, so no conclusion can be drawn from these results.
Explanation: The case where det(A)=0\det(A) = 0 and all det(Ai)=0\det(A_i) = 0 corresponds to the indeterminate form 0/00/0 for each variable. This indicates that the system is dependent, meaning there are infinitely many solutions. While Cramer's rule itself cannot produce a specific solution in this case, the values of the determinants allow us to conclude that the system is dependent.

Question 6

When using Cramer's rule to solve the system below for yy, what is the value of the numerator determinant, det(Ay)\det(A_y)?

{3x+y2z=4x5z=02xy+z=1\begin{cases} 3x + y - 2z = 4 \\ x - 5z = 0 \\ 2x - y + z = -1 \end{cases}
  1. 57
  2. 31
  3. -31
  4. -57 (correct answer)
Explanation: First, write the system with all coefficients, including the zero for the missing yy term in the second equation: x+0y5z=0x + 0y - 5z = 0. The coefficient matrix is A=(312105211)A = \begin{pmatrix} 3 & 1 & -2 \\ 1 & 0 & -5 \\ 2 & -1 & 1 \end{pmatrix} and the constant vector is b=(401)\mathbf{b} = \begin{pmatrix} 4 \\ 0 \\ -1 \end{pmatrix}. To find det(Ay)\det(A_y), we replace the second (y-coefficient) column of AA with b\mathbf{b}: Ay=(342105211)A_y = \begin{pmatrix} 3 & 4 & -2 \\ 1 & 0 & -5 \\ 2 & -1 & 1 \end{pmatrix}. We calculate its determinant, for instance by cofactor expansion along the second row: det(Ay)=1det(4211)+0(5)det(3421)\det(A_y) = -1 \cdot \det\begin{pmatrix} 4 & -2 \\ -1 & 1 \end{pmatrix} + 0 - (-5) \cdot \det\begin{pmatrix} 3 & 4 \\ 2 & -1 \end{pmatrix} =1(4(1)(2)(1))+5(3(1)4(2))= -1(4(1) - (-2)(-1)) + 5(3(-1) - 4(2)) =1(42)+5(38)=1(2)+5(11)=255=57= -1(4 - 2) + 5(-3 - 8) = -1(2) + 5(-11) = -2 - 55 = -57.

Question 7

A student is solving for xx in the system {3x+y=52x4y=1\begin{cases} 3x + y = 5 \\ 2x - 4y = 1 \end{cases} using Cramer's rule. Their work is shown below. Step 1: D=det(3124)=122=14D = \det \begin{pmatrix} 3 & 1 \\ 2 & -4 \end{pmatrix} = -12 - 2 = -14. Step 2: Dx=det(3521)=310=7D_x = \det \begin{pmatrix} 3 & 5 \\ 2 & 1 \end{pmatrix} = 3 - 10 = -7. Step 3: x=DxD=714=12x = \frac{D_x}{D} = \frac{-7}{-14} = \frac{1}{2}. In which step did the student make their first mistake?

  1. Step 1
  2. Step 2 (correct answer)
  3. Step 3
  4. The student made no mistake.
Explanation: The student's calculation of the main determinant DD in Step 1 is correct. However, in Step 2, the student makes an error in setting up the determinant DxD_x. To find DxD_x, the column of x-coefficients (the first column) should be replaced by the constant vector (51)\begin{pmatrix} 5 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}. The student incorrectly replaced the y-coefficient column. The correct setup for DxD_x is det(5114)=201=21\det \begin{pmatrix} 5 & 1 \\ 1 & -4 \end{pmatrix} = -20 - 1 = -21. The matrix the student used in Step 2 is actually the correct setup for DyD_y.

Question 8

The linear system

{x2y+4z=02x+yz=0x8y+kz=0\begin{cases} x - 2y + 4z = 0 \\ 2x + y - z = 0 \\ -x - 8y + kz = 0 \end{cases}

is known to have non-trivial solutions. According to Cramer's Rule, what condition must be met, and what is the value of kk?

  1. det(A)0\det(A) \neq 0, which implies k14k \neq 14.
  2. det(A)=0\det(A) = 0, which implies k=18k = 18.
  3. det(A)=0\det(A) = 0, which implies k=14k = 14. (correct answer)
  4. The system must be inconsistent, which implies k=22k = -22.
Explanation: When you encounter a homogeneous linear system (where all constants equal zero) that has non-trivial solutions, you're dealing with a fundamental concept about matrix determinants and solution existence. For any homogeneous system Ax=0A\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{0}, non-trivial solutions exist if and only if the coefficient matrix is singular, meaning det(A)=0\det(A) = 0. This occurs because when the determinant is zero, the matrix lacks full rank, creating a non-trivial null space. Let's find the determinant of the coefficient matrix: Expanding along the first row: det(A)=1(k8)(2)(2k1)+4(16+1)\det(A) = 1(k - 8) - (-2)(-2k - 1) + 4(-16 + 1) =k84k260=3k70= k - 8 - 4k - 2 - 60 = -3k - 70 For non-trivial solutions, we need det(A)=0\det(A) = 0: 3k70=0-3k - 70 = 0 k=703=14k = -\frac{70}{3} = 14 Therefore, answer C is correct: det(A)=0\det(A) = 0 and k=14k = 14. Answer A incorrectly states that det(A)0\det(A) \neq 0, which would mean only the trivial solution exists. Answer B has the right determinant condition but calculates kk incorrectly. Answer D confuses "inconsistent" with "having non-trivial solutions" — homogeneous systems are always consistent since x=0\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{0} is always a solution. Study tip: Remember that for homogeneous systems, "non-trivial solutions" always means det(A)=0\det(A) = 0. This is a direct application of the fundamental theorem connecting determinants to solution uniqueness.

Question 9

Let the linear system Ax=bA\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{b} have a unique solution given by xi=det(Ai)det(A)x_i = \frac{\det(A_i)}{\det(A)}. If the system is changed to Ax=kbA\mathbf{x} = k\mathbf{b} where kk is a non-zero scalar, how does the new solution for xix_i, denoted xix_i', relate to the original solution xix_i?

  1. xi=kxix_i' = kx_i (correct answer)
  2. xi=1kxix_i' = \frac{1}{k} x_i
  3. xi=knxix_i' = k^n x_i, where nn is the dimension of the matrix AA
  4. xi=xi+kx_i' = x_i + k
Explanation: In the new system Ax=kbA\mathbf{x} = k\mathbf{b}, the coefficient matrix AA remains the same, so det(A)\det(A) is unchanged. The new numerator determinant, det(Ai)\det(A_i'), is calculated from the matrix AiA_i' formed by replacing the ii-th column of AA with the vector kbk\mathbf{b}. A property of determinants states that if a single column of a matrix is multiplied by a scalar kk, the determinant of the new matrix is kk times the determinant of the original. Thus, det(Ai)=kdet(Ai)\det(A_i') = k \cdot \det(A_i). The new solution is xi=det(Ai)det(A)=kdet(Ai)det(A)=kxix_i' = \frac{\det(A_i')}{\det(A)} = \frac{k \cdot \det(A_i)}{\det(A)} = k \cdot x_i.

Question 10

Consider the system of equations:

{2x3y+7z=95y2z=13z=6\begin{cases} 2x - 3y + 7z = 9 \\ 5y - 2z = -1 \\ 3z = 6 \end{cases}

If one were to use Cramer's rule to find xx, what would be the value of the determinant of the coefficient matrix, det(A)\det(A)?

  1. 0
  2. -30
  3. 30 (correct answer)
  4. 108
Explanation: When you encounter Cramer's rule problems, you need to find the determinant of the coefficient matrix — the matrix formed by the coefficients of the variables on the left side of your system. From this system, the coefficient matrix AA is: Notice this is an upper triangular matrix (all entries below the main diagonal are zero). For triangular matrices, the determinant equals the product of the diagonal entries: det(A)=2×5×3=30\det(A) = 2 \times 5 \times 3 = 30. Let's examine why the other answers are incorrect: A) 0 — This would occur if the matrix were singular (non-invertible), meaning the system has either no solution or infinitely many solutions. Since we have a triangular system with non-zero diagonal entries, the system has a unique solution. B) -30 — This might result from incorrectly handling signs when expanding the determinant or miscalculating the product of diagonal elements. The diagonal entries are clearly positive: 2×5×3=302 \times 5 \times 3 = 30, not 30-30. D) 108 — This could come from incorrectly including the constants from the right side of the equations (9, -1, 6) in your calculation, but remember that the coefficient matrix AA only contains the coefficients of xx, yy, and zz. Study tip: Always identify the structure of your matrix first. Upper or lower triangular matrices make determinant calculations much easier — just multiply the diagonal entries. Don't let the constants on the right side distract you from isolating the coefficient matrix.

Question 11

A student applies Cramer's rule to solve 3x+2y=83x + 2y = 8 and 6x+4y=166x + 4y = 16. The student calculates D=3264=0D = \begin{vmatrix} 3 & 2 \\ 6 & 4 \end{vmatrix} = 0 but continues with Dx=82164=0D_x = \begin{vmatrix} 8 & 2 \\ 16 & 4 \end{vmatrix} = 0 and concludes x=00=0x = \frac{0}{0} = 0. What is wrong with this reasoning?

  1. The calculation of DxD_x is incorrect; it should equal 8, making the system inconsistent rather than having x=0x = 0
  2. While both determinants are correctly calculated as zero, 00\frac{0}{0} is indeterminate, not zero, and Cramer's rule doesn't apply here (correct answer)
  3. The student should recognize that D=0D = 0 means infinite solutions exist, so xx can be any value satisfying the original equation
  4. The error is assuming the system has solutions; since D=0D = 0, the system is inconsistent and has no solutions at all
Explanation: The student correctly calculated both determinants as zero: D=3(4)2(6)=0D = 3(4) - 2(6) = 0 and Dx=8(4)2(16)=0D_x = 8(4) - 2(16) = 0. However, 00\frac{0}{0} is mathematically indeterminate, not equal to zero. When D=0D = 0, Cramer's rule cannot be applied regardless of what DxD_x equals. Choice A is wrong because Dx=0D_x = 0 is correct. Choice C is partially correct about infinite solutions but wrong about using Cramer's rule. Choice D is wrong because this system actually has infinite solutions (the second equation is twice the first), not no solutions.

Question 12

For a 3×33 \times 3 system where Cramer's rule applies, suppose det(A)=12\det(A) = 12 and the determinant obtained by replacing the third column with the constants vector is 36-36. If the system is modified by doubling all coefficients in the third equation only, how does this affect the value of zz?

  1. The new value of zz becomes 7224=3\frac{-72}{24} = -3, exactly half the original value of z=6z = -6
  2. The new value of zz becomes 3624=32\frac{-36}{24} = -\frac{3}{2}, which is half the original value of z=3z = -3
  3. The new value of zz remains 3624=32\frac{-36}{24} = -\frac{3}{2}, unchanged from the original value despite coefficient changes (correct answer)
  4. The new value of zz becomes 7212=6\frac{-72}{12} = -6, which is double the original value of z=3z = -3
Explanation: Originally, z=3612=3z = \frac{-36}{12} = -3. When we double all coefficients in the third equation, both det(A)\det(A) and DzD_z are affected. Doubling the third row doubles the determinant of the coefficient matrix, so the new det(A)=24\det(A) = 24. Similarly, doubling the third row in DzD_z doubles that determinant, so the new Dz=72D_z = -72. Therefore, the new z=7224=3z = \frac{-72}{24} = -3, which is the same as the original value. The doubling effect cancels out in the ratio. Choice A gives the wrong original value. Choice B miscalculates both values. Choice D incorrectly suggests the value doubles.

Question 13

Consider solving the system x+2y+z=6x + 2y + z = 6, 2xy+3z=142x - y + 3z = 14, 3x+yz=23x + y - z = 2 using Cramer's rule. If a computational error results in calculating Dy=28D_y = 28 instead of the correct value Dy=28D_y = -28, and D=14D = 14, what would be the incorrect value obtained for yy, and how does it relate to the correct answer?

  1. The incorrect value is y=2y = 2, which is the negative of the correct value y=2y = -2 (correct answer)
  2. The incorrect value is y=12y = \frac{1}{2}, which is the reciprocal of the correct value y=2y = 2
  3. The incorrect value is y=4y = 4, which is twice the magnitude of the correct value y=2y = -2
  4. The incorrect value is y=4y = -4, which has twice the magnitude of the correct value y=2y = -2
Explanation: With the computational error, y=DyD=2814=2y = \frac{D_y}{D} = \frac{28}{14} = 2. With the correct calculation, y=2814=2y = \frac{-28}{14} = -2. The error in sign of DyD_y leads to an answer that is the negative of the correct value. This demonstrates how sign errors in determinant calculations directly propagate to the final answer in Cramer's rule. Choices B, C, and D all give incorrect relationships between the erroneous and correct values.

Question 14

When applying Cramer's rule to a 2×22 \times 2 system, a student finds that swapping two equations changes DD from 1515 to 15-15 and DxD_x from 3030 to 30-30. The student concludes that xx remains unchanged at x=2x = 2. Is this reasoning correct?

  1. Yes, but only because this particular system has the special property that Dx=2DD_x = 2D, which is not generally true
  2. No, swapping equations should not affect DxD_x since it involves replacing columns, not rows, so the calculation is wrong
  3. No, while DD changes sign when equations are swapped, DxD_x should remain the same, giving x=3015=2x = \frac{30}{-15} = -2
  4. Yes, swapping equations changes signs of both numerator and denominator equally, leaving x=3015=3015=2x = \frac{30}{15} = \frac{-30}{-15} = 2 unchanged (correct answer)
Explanation: This question tests your understanding of how row operations affect determinants in Cramer's rule. When you swap two rows in a matrix, the determinant changes sign - this is a fundamental property of determinants. In Cramer's rule for a 2×22 \times 2 system, x=DxDx = \frac{D_x}{D} where DD is the determinant of the coefficient matrix and DxD_x is the determinant when the first column is replaced by the constants. When you swap two equations in the system, you're effectively swapping rows in both the coefficient matrix and the augmented matrix used to find DxD_x. Since swapping rows changes the sign of any determinant, both DD and DxD_x will have their signs flipped. The student's reasoning is correct: x=3015=2x = \frac{30}{15} = 2 originally, and x=3015=2x = \frac{-30}{-15} = 2 after swapping. The negative signs cancel out, leaving xx unchanged. Option A is wrong because this result doesn't depend on the special relationship Dx=2DD_x = 2D - it's true for any system where you swap equations. Option B misunderstands what happens when you swap equations: you're changing the entire system, which affects both the coefficient matrix and the constants vector. Option C incorrectly assumes that only DD changes sign while DxD_x stays the same, but swapping equations affects both determinants equally. Remember: swapping rows in any matrix changes the determinant's sign. In Cramer's rule, this affects both numerator and denominator equally, so the solution remains unchanged.

Question 15

A system of equations Ax=bAx = b has the property that when Cramer's rule is applied, Dx=2DD_x = 2D, Dy=DD_y = -D, and Dz=D2D_z = \frac{D}{2} where D=det(A)0D = \det(A) \neq 0. What can be concluded about the solution?

  1. The solution cannot be determined without knowing the actual value of DD, only the ratios between variables
  2. The solution is (x,y,z)=(12,12,14)(x, y, z) = (\frac{1}{2}, -\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{4}) obtained by careful application of Cramer's rule ratios
  3. The relationships given are impossible since Dx+Dy+DzD_x + D_y + D_z must equal DD for any valid system
  4. The solution is (x,y,z)=(2,1,12)(x, y, z) = (2, -1, \frac{1}{2}) and represents the unique solution to the system (correct answer)
Explanation: When you encounter Cramer's rule problems, remember that this method provides a direct way to solve systems of linear equations by using determinants. For a 3×3 system Ax=bAx = b, each variable is found using the formula: variable = (corresponding numerator determinant) ÷ (coefficient matrix determinant). Given the relationships Dx=2DD_x = 2D, Dy=DD_y = -D, and Dz=D2D_z = \frac{D}{2} where D=det(A)0D = \det(A) \neq 0, you can apply Cramer's rule directly: x=DxD=2DD=2x = \frac{D_x}{D} = \frac{2D}{D} = 2 y=DyD=DD=1y = \frac{D_y}{D} = \frac{-D}{D} = -1 z=DzD=D/2D=12z = \frac{D_z}{D} = \frac{D/2}{D} = \frac{1}{2} This gives the solution (x,y,z)=(2,1,12)(x, y, z) = (2, -1, \frac{1}{2}), confirming answer D. Let's examine why the other options fail: A is incorrect because Cramer's rule gives you exact values, not just ratios—you divide each numerator determinant by the coefficient determinant to get precise solutions. B contains a calculation error; the student likely confused the determinant ratios with the actual variable values. C reflects a fundamental misunderstanding—there's no mathematical requirement that Dx+Dy+Dz=DD_x + D_y + D_z = D; these determinants are formed by replacing different columns of the coefficient matrix and have no such additive relationship. Study tip: With Cramer's rule, always remember the formula is simply "variable = numerator determinant ÷ coefficient determinant." Don't overthink the relationships between different determinants—focus on the straightforward division for each variable.

Question 16

Use Cramer's rule to find the value of yy for the following system of linear equations:

{x+y+z=62xy+z=3x+2yz=2\begin{cases} x + y + z = 6 \\ 2x - y + z = 3 \\ x + 2y - z = 2 \end{cases}
  1. 1
  2. 1/21/2
  3. 3
  4. 2 (correct answer)
Explanation: When you encounter a system of linear equations and need to find a specific variable using Cramer's rule, you're applying a powerful method that uses determinants to solve for individual variables without finding the entire solution set. Cramer's rule states that for a system Ax=bAx = b, the value of variable yy equals det(Ay)det(A)\frac{\det(A_y)}{\det(A)}, where AyA_y is the coefficient matrix with the yy-column replaced by the constants vector. First, find the determinant of the coefficient matrix: det(A)=1(1(1)12)1(2(1)11)+1(22(1)1)=1(12)1(21)+1(4+1)=1+3+5=7\det(A) = 1(-1 \cdot (-1) - 1 \cdot 2) - 1(2 \cdot (-1) - 1 \cdot 1) + 1(2 \cdot 2 - (-1) \cdot 1) = 1(1-2) - 1(-2-1) + 1(4+1) = -1 + 3 + 5 = 7 Next, replace the second column (yy-coefficients) with the constants vector: det(Ay)=1(3(1)12)6(2(1)11)+1(2231)=1(5)6(3)+1(1)=5+18+1=14\det(A_y) = 1(3 \cdot (-1) - 1 \cdot 2) - 6(2 \cdot (-1) - 1 \cdot 1) + 1(2 \cdot 2 - 3 \cdot 1) = 1(-5) - 6(-3) + 1(1) = -5 + 18 + 1 = 14 Therefore: y=det(Ay)det(A)=147=2y = \frac{\det(A_y)}{\det(A)} = \frac{14}{7} = 2 Choice A (1), B (1/2), and C (3) result from computational errors in calculating determinants or incorrectly applying Cramer's rule—perhaps confusing which column to replace or making arithmetic mistakes. Study tip: Always double-check your determinant calculations by expanding along different rows or columns. The most common errors in Cramer's rule stem from determinant computation mistakes, not conceptual misunderstandings.

Question 17

The system of equations kx+3y=1kx + 3y = -1 and 4x+2y=54x + 2y = 5 has a unique solution for all values of kk except one. What is this exceptional value of kk?

  1. -6
  2. 12
  3. 2/32/3
  4. 6 (correct answer)
Explanation: When you encounter a system of linear equations and need to find when it lacks a unique solution, you're dealing with the fundamental concept of linear dependence. A system has a unique solution except when the equations become linearly dependent (proportional to each other) but have different constant terms, creating an inconsistent system. For the system kx+3y=1kx + 3y = -1 and 4x+2y=54x + 2y = 5 to lack a unique solution, the left sides must be proportional while the right sides are not. This means the coefficients must satisfy: k4=32\frac{k}{4} = \frac{3}{2} Solving for kk: k=432=6k = 4 \cdot \frac{3}{2} = 6 When k=6k = 6, the first equation becomes 6x+3y=16x + 3y = -1, which is equivalent to 2x+y=132x + y = -\frac{1}{3}. The second equation 4x+2y=54x + 2y = 5 is equivalent to 2x+y=522x + y = \frac{5}{2}. These equations demand the same expression (2x+y2x + y) equal two different values, making the system inconsistent with no solution. Choice A) k=6k = -6 would make the coefficients 64=32\frac{-6}{4} = -\frac{3}{2}, which doesn't equal 32\frac{3}{2}. Choice B) k=12k = 12 gives 124=332\frac{12}{4} = 3 \neq \frac{3}{2}. Choice C) k=23k = \frac{2}{3} yields 2/34=1632\frac{2/3}{4} = \frac{1}{6} \neq \frac{3}{2}. All these values preserve the system's unique solution. Remember: A system loses its unique solution when coefficient ratios match but constant term ratios don't. Set up the proportion a1a2=b1b2\frac{a_1}{a_2} = \frac{b_1}{b_2} and solve for the parameter.

Question 18

A system of linear equations has coefficient matrix AA with det(A)=0\det(A) = 0. Which statement about using Cramer's rule for this system is most accurate?

  1. Cramer's rule can be applied, but will yield infinite solutions for each variable when the system is consistent
  2. Cramer's rule cannot be applied because division by zero would occur, regardless of system consistency (correct answer)
  3. Cramer's rule can be applied only if all numerator determinants are also zero, indicating infinite solutions
  4. Cramer's rule yields zero for all variables, which represents the trivial solution when it exists
Explanation: Cramer's rule requires det(A)0\det(A) \neq 0 to be applicable. When det(A)=0\det(A) = 0, the formula xi=det(Ai)det(A)x_i = \frac{\det(A_i)}{\det(A)} involves division by zero, making Cramer's rule undefined regardless of whether the system has no solutions, infinitely many solutions, or is inconsistent. Choice A is wrong because Cramer's rule cannot be applied at all when det(A)=0\det(A) = 0. Choice C is wrong because even if numerator determinants are zero, we still have 00\frac{0}{0} which is indeterminate. Choice D is wrong because we cannot conclude that variables equal zero when the rule is inapplicable.