Latin 2 Quiz: Deponent Verbs
14 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Deponent VerbsQuestion 1 of 14

Puer patrem sequebatur. Translate 'sequebatur.'

he was followed
he was following
he had followed
he has followed
← Back to quizzes

Latin 2 Quiz

Latin 2 Quiz: Deponent Verbs

Practice Deponent Verbs in Latin 2 with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Deponent Verbs, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Latin 2.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Puer patrem sequebatur. Translate 'sequebatur.'

  1. he was followed
  2. he was following (correct answer)
  3. he had followed
  4. he has followed
Explanation: Sequebatur is the imperfect tense of the deponent verb sequor, 'follow.' Deponent verbs have passive-looking endings but active meanings, so sequebatur means 'he was following.' The tempting error is 'he was followed,' which treats the passive ending as passive; with sequor, that ending still expresses active following.

Question 2

Rex cum civibus loquitur. Translate 'loquitur.'

  1. he is spoken
  2. he has spoken
  3. he will speak
  4. he is speaking (correct answer)
Explanation: Loquitur is the present tense third-person singular of the deponent verb loquor, so its -tur ending is passive in form but active in meaning. That gives 'he is speaking' (or 'he speaks'). The tempting error is 'he is spoken,' treating -tur as a true passive; deponent verbs don't work that way.

Question 3

Milites ex oppido profecti sunt. Translate 'profecti sunt.'

  1. they were sent out
  2. they had set out
  3. they have set out (correct answer)
  4. they were setting out
Explanation: Profecti sunt is the perfect tense of the deponent verb proficiscor, so the passive-looking form still means an active action: setting out. The perfect gives 'they have set out.' The tempting error is 'they were sent out,' but that confuses proficiscor with mitto: sent out would be missi sunt.

Question 4

Milites gladiis utentur. Translate 'utentur.'

  1. they will employ (correct answer)
  2. they will be used
  3. they are using
  4. they have used
Explanation: Utentur is the future tense of the deponent verb utor, which takes an ablative object (gladiis = with swords). Deponent verbs have passive-looking endings but active meaning, so utentur means 'they will employ/use.' The tempting mistake is reading it as passive 'they will be used,' but utor is active in sense.

Question 5

Mater filium hortatur. Translate 'hortatur.'

  1. she is urged
  2. she is urging (correct answer)
  3. she was urging
  4. she will urge
Explanation: Hortatur comes from hortor, a deponent verb, so it has a passive-looking ending but an active meaning: present tense, 'she urges / she is urging.' The tempting mistake is 'she is urged,' which treats the -tur ending as passive, but deponent verbs are active in sense.

Question 6

Milites per silvas iter faciebant cum subito ducem suum loquentem audiverunt.

In the sentence above, which word is a deponent verb, and what is its correct translation?

  1. "faciebant" — it is a deponent verb meaning "they were making," since facio uses passive morphology in certain tenses to express active meaning
  2. "loquentem" — it is a deponent verb form meaning "speaking," the present active participle of loquor, loqui, a 3rd-conjugation deponent (correct answer)
  3. "audiverunt" — it is a deponent verb meaning "they heard," because its perfect -erunt ending resembles the ending of passive deponent perfects
  4. "iter" — it is a deponent verbal noun meaning "journey," functioning here in place of a finite deponent verb form
Explanation: When a question asks you to identify a deponent verb, your first move should be to recall the defining feature: deponent verbs have passive forms but active meanings. They have no active voice forms in their principal parts, yet they translate actively. Recognizing them requires knowing your vocabulary and principal parts. In this sentence, the word "loquentem" is the form to examine. Its dictionary entry is loquor, loqui, locutus sum — a 3rd-conjugation deponent. The form loquentem is the present active participle in the accusative singular, meaning "speaking." Even though deponents are built on passive morphology, their participles — including the present participle — carry active meaning. Here, it tells you what the soldiers heard the leader doing: they heard him speaking. Choice A is tempting but wrong. Faciebant comes from facio, facere, a perfectly regular active verb. It is not deponent at all — it simply uses standard imperfect active endings. The claim that facio uses passive morphology is false. Choice C misidentifies audiverunt. The -erunt ending is the standard 3rd-person plural perfect active ending for regular verbs. Audio is a regular 4th-conjugation verb, not a deponent, and this form is entirely active in morphology. Choice D is a creative distractor, but iter is simply a neuter noun meaning "journey" — a noun, not a verbal form of any kind. Verbal nouns exist in Latin (like gerunds), but iter is not one of them. Your study tip: always verify deponents by checking their principal parts — if the first form ends in -or and the infinitive in -i, you have a deponent.

Question 7

A student translates the Latin sentence "Puella in horto moratur" as "The girl is being delayed in the garden." What error has the student made?

  1. The student correctly identified the passive form but failed to note that morari is a deponent verb, so the translation should be active: "The girl lingers/stays in the garden." (correct answer)
  2. The student used the wrong tense; "moratur" is a perfect passive form and should be translated as "the girl had been delayed in the garden."
  3. The student correctly translated the verb because "moratur" is a true passive form of the regular verb moro, morare, meaning "to cause delay."
  4. The student mistranslated the subject; "puella" is nominative plural, so the correct translation is "the girls are being delayed in the garden."
Explanation: When you encounter a Latin verb that looks passive but feels off, your first instinct should be to check whether it's a deponent verb — one that wears passive clothing but carries an active meaning. That's exactly what's happening here. Morari (to linger, to stay, to delay oneself) is a deponent verb, meaning it exists only in passive forms but is always translated actively. So moratur — third-person singular present passive indicative — looks like "is being delayed" but actually means "lingers" or "stays." The full sentence "Puella in horto moratur" correctly translates as "The girl lingers/stays in the garden." Answer A captures this perfectly: the student recognized the passive form but forgot the deponent rule that strips away the passive meaning in translation. Answer B is wrong on two counts: moratur is present tense, not perfect, and the perfect passive of a deponent verb would be formed differently (using a perfect participle). Answer C is tempting but false — moro as a regular transitive verb ("to cause delay") is not the standard dictionary entry here, and even if it were, deponent status would still need to be addressed. Answer D is simply a grammar error on your part as a reader: puella is nominative singular, not plural (the plural would be puellae). Study tip: Keep a running list of common deponent verbs — loqui, sequi, morari, mirari — and drill their forms. On Latin exams, deponents are a favorite trap precisely because their passive forms look so convincing.

Question 8

Which of the following Latin verb forms, if encountered in a text, would MOST require a reader to recognize the deponent nature of the verb in order to avoid mistranslation?

  1. "amant" — third-person plural present of amo, amare, meaning "they love," which has an identical active form whether deponent or not
  2. "sequuntur" — third-person plural present of sequor, sequi, meaning "they follow," whose passive-looking form would mislead a reader into translating it as "they are being followed" (correct answer)
  3. "portabantur" — third-person plural imperfect passive of porto, portare, meaning "they were being carried," a regular passive that requires no special knowledge of deponents
  4. "scripserunt" — third-person plural perfect active of scribo, scribere, meaning "they wrote," whose active ending clearly signals active meaning without any ambiguity
Explanation: When you encounter a Latin verb, your job is to match form to meaning — and deponent verbs are the classic trap, because they wear passive clothing but carry active meaning. This question asks you to identify which form would most dangerously mislead a reader who doesn't recognize the deponent. The answer is B, "sequuntur." The verb sequor, sequi is deponent, meaning it exists only in passive forms but is translated actively. If you see "sequuntur" and don't know it's deponent, the "-untur" ending screams passive: "they are being followed." That mistranslation completely inverts the sentence's meaning. Recognizing the deponent nature is the only thing standing between you and a wrong translation — which is precisely what the question asks. Choice A is a trap because "amant" is a standard active form of a non-deponent verb. No passive-looking ending, no deponent issue — nothing requires special knowledge here. Choice C describes "portabantur," a perfectly regular passive of porto — a non-deponent verb used in genuine passive voice. The passive translation ("they were being carried") is correct, so no deponent knowledge is needed. Choice D, "scripserunt," is a straightforward perfect active form with a clear "-erunt" ending; it signals active meaning directly and involves no deponent ambiguity. The key pattern to remember: deponents are dangerous precisely because their passive forms demand active translations. Whenever you see a passive-looking ending, ask yourself — is this verb deponent? Keep a short list of common deponents (sequor, loquor, utor, patior, morior) memorized so this trap doesn't catch you on exam day.

Question 9

Rex, postquam hostes conspicatus est, milites suos hortatus est ut fortiter pugnarent.

The sentence above contains two deponent verb forms. Which answer correctly identifies BOTH forms and gives their accurate active translations?

  1. "conspicatus est" means "he was spotted" and "hortatus est" means "he was encouraged" — both are perfect passive constructions of regular active verbs
  2. "conspicatus est" means "he spotted" and "hortatus est" means "he urged" — both carry active meaning as perfect forms of the deponents conspicor and hortor (correct answer)
  3. "conspicatus est" means "he spotted" and "pugnarent" means "they fought" — these are the two deponents, since pugnarent has an unusual subjunctive ending marking deponency
  4. "hortatus est" means "he urged" and "pugnarent" means "they were being fought" — hortatus est is deponent while pugnarent is a passive subjunctive of a separate deponent verb
Explanation: When you encounter a question about deponent verbs, your first move should be to recall their defining quirk: deponents have passive forms but active meanings. They look passive on the surface but translate as active. This is especially visible in the perfect tense, where deponents use esse + a perfect passive participle — the same construction as a true passive — but mean something entirely active. In this sentence, conspicatus est comes from conspicor (to spot, observe) and hortatus est comes from hortor (to urge, encourage) — both classic deponent verbs. Even though they look like "he was spotted" and "he was encouraged," they correctly translate as "he spotted" and "he urged." That's the essence of answer B, which is correct. Answer A makes the most common deponent mistake: treating these forms as regular passive constructions and translating them passively ("he was spotted," "he was encouraged"). If conspicor and hortor were regular verbs, that translation would work — but they're deponents, so it doesn't. Answer C wrongly identifies pugnarent as a deponent form. Pugnarent is simply the imperfect subjunctive of pugno (to fight), a perfectly ordinary active verb appearing here in an indirect command (ut + subjunctive). Its ending does not signal deponency — that's a fabricated rule. Answer D also misidentifies pugnarent as relevant, then compounds the error by calling it a "passive subjunctive," which misunderstands both the verb and the grammar of the ut-clause entirely. Your study tip: memorize high-frequency deponents like hortor, conspicor, loquor, sequor, and patior. On the exam, if you see esse + participle and know the verb is deponent, always translate it actively.

Question 10

A student learning Latin encounters the verb "loquor" in a dictionary and notices that its principal parts are listed as: loquor, loqui, locutus sum. The student concludes: "Since the first principal part ends in -or, this verb can also be used in active voice forms like loquo or loquis to express the same meaning." What is wrong with the student's conclusion?

  1. The student is correct that deponent verbs can appear in active forms; however, loquor specifically lacks active forms because it belongs to the 3rd conjugation rather than the 1st or 2nd, which permit active alternates.
  2. The student is partially correct: deponent verbs have active forms in the present tense only, such as loquo and loquis, but revert to passive forms in the perfect tense like locutus sum.
  3. Deponent verbs have no active voice forms in classical Latin. Forms like loquo and loquis do not exist; the -or ending signals that the verb uses passive morphology exclusively to express active meaning. (correct answer)
  4. The student's error is in the principal parts: a deponent verb requires four principal parts, and the absence of a 4th principal part for loquor proves it is defective rather than truly deponent.
Explanation: When you see a verb whose first principal part ends in -or rather than -o, you're looking at a deponent verb — and understanding what that means is everything for this question. Deponent verbs are a special category in Latin: they look passive (passive endings throughout) but carry active meaning. The "-or" is not a stylistic option; it is the only form the verb takes. This is exactly why C is correct. Loquor ("I speak") uses passive morphology exclusively — forms like loquo or loquis simply do not exist in classical Latin. There is no active-voice equivalent hiding behind the passive forms. The passive endings are the verb. The student's mistake is treating "-or" as a signal that a parallel active form exists, when in reality deponent verbs have abandoned active morphology entirely. A is wrong because the claim that 1st/2nd conjugation deponents permit active alternates is invented — no conjugation class unlocks active forms for deponent verbs. Conjugation affects spelling patterns, not the deponent rule itself. B is wrong because it fabricates a "present-tense only" exception. Deponents never use active forms in any tense; the perfect locutus sum looks passive in form but is entirely active in meaning, which is exactly what deponents do throughout. D is wrong because it misidentifies the problem entirely — the principal parts given (loquor, loqui, locutus sum) are standard and correct for a deponent verb, which typically has three principal parts, not four. A reliable study tip: when you encounter a verb listed with -or as its first principal part and a perfect in -us sum, flag it immediately as deponent — passive form, active meaning, no exceptions.

Question 11

Omnes cives in forum progressi sunt ut orationem ducis audirent.

In the passage above, "progressi sunt" is a perfect indicative form. Which of the following best explains why it must be translated with active meaning despite its passive-looking morphology?

  1. "Progressi sunt" is a genuine perfect passive, but Latin grammar permits passive constructions to carry active meaning when the subject is animate and performing a purposeful civic action, making an active translation appropriate here.
  2. "Progressi sunt" must be translated actively because any Latin perfect passive participle combined with a form of esse automatically signals active meaning whenever the subject is animate, regardless of whether the verb is deponent.
  3. "Progressi sunt" is the perfect indicative of progredior, progredi, progressus sum, a deponent verb. Since deponents use passive morphology to express active meaning, the correct translation is "they advanced," not "they were advanced." (correct answer)
  4. "Progressi sunt" is active in meaning because progredior is a semi-deponent verb that uses active forms in the present system and passive forms in the perfect system, so the perfect form naturally reverts to active meaning.
Explanation: When you encounter a Latin verb form that looks passive but is translated actively, your first instinct should be to check whether the verb is deponent. Deponent verbs are a distinct class in Latin that borrow passive morphology while expressing entirely active meaning — they are not passive verbs that happen to sound active; they simply use a different set of endings by convention. Progredior, progredi, progressus sum is a classic deponent verb meaning "to advance" or "to proceed." Its principal parts already signal this: the infinitive ends in -i (passive) and the first person perfect is progressus sum (passive form, active meaning). So progressi sunt — "they advanced" — is the perfect indicative of this deponent verb, and C correctly identifies exactly this logic. Answer A is built on a fabricated rule. Latin has no grammatical principle allowing passive constructions to shift to active meaning simply because the subject is animate or performing a civic action. That explanation is invented and should be rejected immediately. Answer B overgeneralizes. A perfect passive participle combined with esse does not automatically signal active meaning for all animate subjects. That combination is the standard perfect passive construction for non-deponent verbs (laudati sunt = "they were praised"), so animacy alone changes nothing. Answer D misidentifies progredior as semi-deponent. Semi-deponent verbs (like audeo) use active forms in the present system and passive forms only in the perfect. Progredior, however, is fully deponent — it uses passive morphology throughout all tenses. Your study tip: memorize common deponent verbs and their principal parts (loquor, sequor, progredior, morior). On the exam, spotting a passive-looking form with active context is your cue to ask, "Is this deponent?"

Question 12

Dux, cum in castra rediisset, de rebus gestis loquebatur. Milites eum admirati sunt.

In the passage above, "admirati sunt" and "loquebatur" are both deponent verb forms. A student translates the passage as: "The leader, when he had returned to camp, was being spoken about regarding the things done. The soldiers had been admired by him." How many translation errors involving deponents has the student made, and what are they?

  1. One error: "loquebatur" is correctly translated as a passive when the subject is being discussed, but "admirati sunt" should be "they admired" rather than "they had been admired," since admiror is deponent.
  2. One error: "admirati sunt" should be "they admired" since admiror is deponent, but "loquebatur" is the imperfect passive of the regular verb loquo, loquare and is therefore correctly translated as "was being spoken about."
  3. Two errors: "loquebatur" requires a passive translation because context shows the leader is being discussed, and "admirati sunt" requires changing the subject of the clause entirely since admiror reverses the agent in perfect constructions.
  4. Two errors: "loquebatur" should be translated actively as "was speaking" (from the deponent loquor), and "admirati sunt" should be translated actively as "they admired" (from the deponent admiror) — neither should be rendered as a passive. (correct answer)
Explanation: Whenever you encounter deponent verbs in Latin, the golden rule is this: deponent verbs have passive forms but active meanings. They look passive, but you must always translate them actively. Never render a deponent as a true passive in English. In this passage, both loquebatur (from loquor, "to speak") and admirati sunt (from admiror, "to admire") are deponent. Loquebatur is imperfect, so it translates as "he was speaking." Admirati sunt is perfect, so despite its passive-looking participial form, it translates as "they admired." The correct reading of the whole passage is: "The leader, when he had returned to camp, was speaking about the things done. The soldiers admired him." The student made two errors — mistranslating both deponents as genuine passives — making D the correct answer. Answer A is wrong because it accepts the student's passive translation of loquebatur as correct, claiming context justifies it. Context never overrides deponent grammar; loquor is always active in meaning. Answer B compounds the error further by inventing a non-existent regular verb loquo, loquare. No such verb exists — loquor is deponent only, with no active form. Answer C is wrong on both counts: it wrongly claims loquebatur requires passive translation, and it fabricates a rule that admiror "reverses the agent" in perfect constructions, which is not a feature of Latin grammar. Study tip: When you spot a verb in your deponent vocabulary list, mentally flag it: "passive form, active meaning — always." If you translate it passively on an exam, it's an automatic error, regardless of context.

Question 13

"Audeo, audere, ausus sum" is classified as a semi-deponent verb. Which statement most accurately distinguishes how a semi-deponent verb like audeo differs from a fully deponent verb like loquor, and what implication does this have for translating the form "ausus est"?

  1. Semi-deponent verbs use passive forms throughout all tenses with active meaning, just like fully deponent verbs, but audeo is called semi-deponent only because it belongs to a mixed conjugation. "Ausus est" therefore means "he was dared," following standard passive rules.
  2. Semi-deponent verbs are simply deponent verbs that have lost their deponent classification over time, so audeo can be freely translated either actively or passively depending on context. "Ausus est" would thus mean "he dared" or "he was dared" interchangeably.
  3. Semi-deponent verbs use passive forms in the present system and active forms in the perfect system, which is the reverse of fully deponent verbs. Therefore "ausus est" is a genuine perfect passive meaning "he was dared" and should be translated accordingly.
  4. Semi-deponent verbs use active forms in the present system and passive forms (with active meaning) in the perfect system. Therefore "ausus est," the perfect form of audeo, looks passive but means "he dared," not "he was dared." (correct answer)
Explanation: When you encounter a verb labeled "semi-deponent," the key question to ask is: which tenses behave deponently? That distinction is exactly what this question tests. A fully deponent verb like loquor uses passive forms throughout all tenses, yet always carries active meaning ("to speak"). A semi-deponent verb splits the job: audeo uses normal active forms in the present system (present, imperfect, future), but switches to passive forms in the perfect system (perfect, pluperfect, future perfect) — again with active meaning. So ausus est looks like a perfect passive construction ("he was dared"), but because audeo is semi-deponent, it actually means "he dared." That's why D is correct. A is wrong because it falsely claims semi-deponents use passive forms throughout all tenses — that describes a fully deponent verb, not a semi-deponent one. The claim that audeo earns its label merely from conjugation class is also invented. B is wrong because semi-deponents are not simply "faded" deponents, and the translation is not freely interchangeable. The active meaning is fixed, not context-dependent — ausus est can only mean "he dared." C has the pattern exactly backwards. It says semi-deponents use passive forms in the present system and active forms in the perfect system. That's the opposite of reality for audeo. Study tip: Memorize this shorthand — semi-deponents are "active first, passive-looking later." If you see a perfect passive form of audeo, fido, or gaudeo, translate it actively without hesitation.

Question 14

Which of the following pairs correctly matches a deponent verb with its conjugation class AND an accurate translation of the given form?

  1. vereor, vereri, veritus sum (2nd conjugation) — "veretur" translates as "he/she fears" because vereor is deponent and its passive form carries active meaning (correct answer)
  2. patior, pati, passus sum (3rd-io conjugation) — "patitur" translates as "he/she is suffered" because the -tur ending marks a genuine passive of this regular verb
  3. loquor, loqui, locutus sum (3rd conjugation) — "loquitur" translates as "he/she is spoken to" because the -itur ending signals a passive action directed at the subject
  4. hortor, hortari, hortatus sum (1st conjugation) — "hortatur" translates as "he/she is being urged" since the -atur ending is a standard passive marker in Latin
Explanation: When you encounter a question about deponent verbs, your job is twofold: identify the conjugation class correctly, and remember the golden rule — deponent verbs have passive forms but active meanings. They are not truly passive, even though they look it. Choice A gets both things right. Vereor, vereri belongs to the 2nd conjugation (infinitive ending -ēri confirms this). The form veretur uses the 3rd person singular present passive ending -tur, but because vereor is deponent, that passive-looking form carries the active meaning "he/she fears." This is exactly how deponent verbs work, making A the correct answer. Choice B contains a critical error in translation. Patior, pati is indeed 3rd-io conjugation, and patitur is its deponent form — but the translation "he/she is suffered" treats it as a genuine passive. Because patior is deponent, patitur means "he/she suffers/endures," not a passive construction. The form looks passive; the meaning is active. Choice C misidentifies loquitur similarly. Loquor is 3rd conjugation (correct), but translating loquitur as "he/she is spoken to" invents a passive meaning. Deponent verbs cannot mean a passive action done to the subject — loquitur simply means "he/she speaks." Choice D makes the same translation mistake with hortatur. Hortor is 1st conjugation (correct), but "he/she is being urged" is wrong. As a deponent, hortatur means "he/she urges." Your study tip: when you see a deponent verb, mentally block out the passive ending and translate actively — the passive appearance is just a disguise.