Conversational Japanese Quiz: Explaining Needs And Wants
8 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Explaining Needs And WantsQuestion 1 of 8

You are traveling in Japan and need to check into a hotel. You arrive at the front desk and want to explain that you have a reservation under your name, you need a non-smoking room on a high floor, and you would like to know if early check-in is available because your flight arrived several hours ahead of schedule.

Which Japanese expression most accurately and completely conveys your situation to the hotel staff in a natural, polite register?

「予約しているマイケルと申します。禁煙の高層階の部屋をお願いしたいのですが、便が予定より早く着いたため、早めにチェックインできるかどうかもお聞きしたいです。」
「マイケルという者ですが、禁煙室と高い部屋が欲しいです。チェックインは早いですか？フライトが早かったから来ました。」
「予約のマイケルです。タバコなしの部屋と上の階をください。早くチェックインしたいです。飛行機が早く来たので。」
「マイケルと申しますが、禁煙室と高層階をご希望します。早いチェックインをしてほしいし、フライトは予定より前に到着しました。」
← Back to quizzes

Conversational Japanese Quiz

Conversational Japanese Quiz: Explaining Needs And Wants

Practice Explaining Needs And Wants in Conversational Japanese with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Explaining Needs And Wants, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Conversational Japanese.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

You are traveling in Japan and need to check into a hotel. You arrive at the front desk and want to explain that you have a reservation under your name, you need a non-smoking room on a high floor, and you would like to know if early check-in is available because your flight arrived several hours ahead of schedule.

Which Japanese expression most accurately and completely conveys your situation to the hotel staff in a natural, polite register?

  1. 「予約しているマイケルと申します。禁煙の高層階の部屋をお願いしたいのですが、便が予定より早く着いたため、早めにチェックインできるかどうかもお聞きしたいです。」 (correct answer)
  2. 「マイケルという者ですが、禁煙室と高い部屋が欲しいです。チェックインは早いですか？フライトが早かったから来ました。」
  3. 「予約のマイケルです。タバコなしの部屋と上の階をください。早くチェックインしたいです。飛行機が早く来たので。」
  4. 「マイケルと申しますが、禁煙室と高層階をご希望します。早いチェックインをしてほしいし、フライトは予定より前に到着しました。」
Explanation: When communicating in a hotel setting in Japan, you need to evaluate three things simultaneously: politeness register, grammatical accuracy, and naturalness. Hotel interactions require keigo (敬語) or at minimum a polite, humble tone — casual phrasing sounds rude and unprofessional in this context. Option A succeeds on all fronts. 「予約しているマイケルと申します」uses 申す (humble form of 言う) to introduce yourself gracefully. 「禁煙の高層階の部屋をお願いしたいのですが」makes the room request politely using the softening conjunction が. Most importantly, 「便が予定より早く着いたため、早めにチェックインできるかどうかもお聞きしたいです」explains the flight situation with precise, natural reasoning (ため = "because/due to") and frames the early check-in as a polite inquiry rather than a demand. This is exactly how a considerate guest would speak. Option B fails on register and clarity. 「欲しいです」is too blunt for a service interaction, and 「チェックインは早いですか？」is ambiguous — it sounds like you're asking if check-in is fast, not if early check-in is available. The explanation for the flight is also fragmented and unnatural. Option C is overly simplified and childlike. 「タバコなしの部屋」and 「上の階をください」sound like a child ordering food, not a traveler making a polite hotel request. The final fragment 「飛行機が早く来たので。」trails off without completing the thought. Option D mixes registers incorrectly. 「ご希望します」is grammatically wrong — ご希望 requires する or いただく in proper keigo (e.g., ご希望いたします). Mixing humble vocabulary with incorrect grammar actually sounds worse than plain speech. As a study tip: watch for incomplete sentences and register mismatches in wrong answers — Japanese exams frequently test whether you can distinguish natural, complete polite expressions from ones that merely look formal.

Question 2

Emma is at a Japanese city hall and needs to explain to a staff member that she wants to register her change of address, that she has recently moved from Osaka to this city, that she does not have her residence card with her today but can bring it tomorrow, and that she wants to know if she can start the process today without it.

Emma says the following to the staff member. Identify which version correctly communicates all four elements of her situation in natural, appropriately polite spoken Japanese:

  1. 「住所変更をお願いしたいのですが、最近大阪からこちらに引っ越してきたところです。在留カードは今日持っていないため、明日でも持参することが可能でして、本日手続きを開始できるかどうかお聞きしてもよろしいでしょうか。」
  2. 「住所変更の手続きがしたいです。大阪から来ました。在留カードは今日ありませんが、明日持ってきます。今日できますか？」
  3. 「転居届を出したいと思っておりますが、大阪より引っ越してまいりました。在留カードは明日持参予定ですが、本日はお持ちでないため、今日から手続き可能かどうかをお伺いしたいと思います。」
  4. 「転居の届け出をしたいのですが、大阪からこちらに引っ越してきました。今日は在留カードを持ってきていないのですが、明日持参できます。カードなしで今日手続きを始めることはできますでしょうか。」 (correct answer)
Explanation: When evaluating Japanese for formal situations like a city hall visit, you need to assess three things simultaneously: accuracy of content (are all four points communicated?), register (is the politeness level appropriate for a bureaucratic setting?), and naturalness (does it sound like something a real person would actually say?). Choice D hits all three targets. It uses 「転居の届け出をしたいのですが」 — the natural, everyday term for submitting a change-of-address form — and flows through each point cleanly: the move from Osaka, today's missing residence card, tomorrow's plan to bring it, and the polite closing question 「カードなしで今日手続きを始めることはできますでしょうか」. The register is respectfully polite without being stiff or unnatural. Choice A is over-formalized to the point of awkwardness. Phrases like 「持参することが可能でして」 sound bureaucratic and stilted — nobody actually speaks this way at a counter, even formally. It reads more like written administrative language than natural spoken Japanese. Choice B swings to the opposite extreme. 「今日できますか？」 and 「大阪から来ました」 are far too casual and incomplete for a formal government office interaction. This register would feel abrupt and slightly rude to a staff member. Choice C contains a subtle but important error: 「本日はお持ちでないため」 uses 「お持ち」, which is honorific language directed at the listener — but Emma is talking about herself not having the card. This is a keigo (敬語) misapplication that reverses who is being respected. A useful study rule: in Japanese formal speech, watch carefully whether honorific forms refer to the speaker or the listener — mixing them up is a classic and easy-to-miss error.

Question 3

Hiroshi is calling a Japanese restaurant to make a reservation. He wants a table for six people this Saturday at 7 PM, he needs to mention that one guest has a severe shellfish allergy, and he wants to ask whether the restaurant can accommodate a birthday cake that the group plans to bring from outside.

Hiroshi successfully books the table, but then needs to communicate the allergy and the cake question. Which response best represents how he should continue the conversation in natural, polite spoken Japanese?

  1. 「あと、一人が甲殻類アレルギーで、ひどいやつなんですよね。気をつけてもらえますか？ケーキを外から持ってきていいですか？」
  2. 「それから、一名が甲殻類の重いアレルギーを持っておりまして、十分にご注意いただければと存じます。また、外からバースデーケーキを持ち込んでもよろしいでしょうか。」 (correct answer)
  3. 「それと、甲殻類アレルギーのお客様がいらっしゃいますので、アレルギー対応をお願いします。バースデーケーキの持ち込みはいかがでしょうか。」
  4. 「なお、甲殻類に対する重篤なアレルギーをお持ちの方が一名おられますため、細心のご注意をお願い申し上げます。また、外部からバースデーケーキを持参する予定ですが、持ち込みは可能かどうかお伺いできますでしょうか。」
Explanation: When making requests over the phone in Japanese, register calibration is everything. You're not just choosing polite words — you're choosing a level of formality appropriate to the social context. Calling a restaurant puts you in the role of a customer speaking to service staff, which calls for teineigo (丁寧語) or moderate keigo, not casual speech and not hyper-formal bureaucratic language. Option B hits this balance precisely. 「おりまして」 is humble speech (謙譲語) appropriate for referring to someone in your own group, 「十分にご注意いただければと存じます」 is a polished but natural request, and 「よろしいでしょうか」 is the standard phone-appropriate way to ask permission. The word 「重い」 for a severe allergy is also natural spoken Japanese. Critically, the phrasing sounds like something a real person would say on the phone — not a legal document. Option A is too casual. 「ひどいやつなんですよね」 is slangy and informal — completely inappropriate when calling a restaurant. The register mismatch makes this the obvious wrong choice. Option C sounds like instructions rather than a polite request. 「アレルギー対応をお願いします」 is abrupt, and 「バースデーケーキの持ち込みはいかがでしょうか」 is oddly phrased — 「いかが」 here sounds like you're offering the cake, not asking permission. Option D overcorrects into stiff, written-style formality. Phrases like 「お伺いできますでしょうか」 (double-humble) and 「重篤な」 (a clinical/written term) would feel unnatural in a phone call — this reads like formal correspondence, not spoken Japanese. Remember: For phone Japanese, aim for 丁寧語 with selective 謙譲語 — polished but conversational. If a phrase sounds like it belongs in a business letter, it's probably too stiff.

Question 4

Kenji is writing an email to a travel agency in Japan. He wants to book a tour but needs to explain that he requires a wheelchair-accessible vehicle, that his group consists of four adults and one child under age six, and that they want to depart in the morning rather than the afternoon.

Kenji drafts the following sentence to explain his group's transportation need: 「車椅子が 車をご用意 いただけますでしょうか。」 Which pair of words correctly fills both blanks to produce a natural, polite written request?

  1. 利用できる ／ して
  2. 対応している ／ して (correct answer)
  3. 使える ／ に
  4. 乗れる ／ して
Explanation: When writing formal requests in Japanese, two things must work together: the verb modifying the noun must accurately describe the vehicle's capability, and the grammar connecting ご用意 to いただけますでしょうか must be correct. This question tests both at once. The sentence means "Could you please prepare a vehicle that   wheelchairs?" The blank before 車 needs a verb phrase that naturally describes a vehicle as wheelchair-compatible. 対応している ("is compatible with / accommodates") is the standard, professional expression used in travel and service contexts — you'll commonly see 車椅子対応 on signage and in business writing. Combined with して, the full phrase ご用意していただけますでしょうか forms a polished keigo request: "Could you kindly prepare [one] for us?" Here's why the other options fall short. A) 利用できる means "can use," so 車椅子が利用できる車 would mean "a car where wheelchairs can be used" — grammatically awkward and unnatural in this context. The phrasing also blurs who is doing the using. C) 使える has a similar problem — 車椅子が使える車 sounds casual and vague, and the particle に doesn't connect ご用意 to いただけますでしょうか correctly; you need して, not に, to form the te-form connection. D) 乗れる means "can ride/board," so 車椅子が乗れる車 implies the wheelchair itself is riding — a strange image. The correct subject should be the person, not the wheelchair. As a study tip: in formal Japanese requests, match the register of your verb choice to your context. 対応している is the go-to professional term for "accommodation/compatibility," and memorizing it as a set phrase will help you across many service-related scenarios.

Question 5

Yuna is at a Japanese pharmacy and needs to ask for medicine for a headache. She also wants to explain that she is pregnant and therefore needs something safe for pregnancy, and that she prefers tablets over liquid medicine.

Which sentence most accurately and completely communicates all of Yuna's needs to the pharmacist in appropriate, natural Japanese?

  1. 「頭痛薬をいただきたいのですが、妊娠中でも服用できるものをご希望します。錠剤タイプをお願いいたします。」
  2. 「頭が痛いので薬をください。妊娠しているから、大丈夫な薬がいいです。錠剤のほうが液体よりいいです。」
  3. 「頭痛の薬が必要なのですが、妊娠中なので安全なものをお願いしたいです。また、液体より錠剤のほうが好ましいです。」 (correct answer)
  4. 「頭痛に効く薬をお探しですが、妊娠中のため適切なものをご案内ください。液体ではなく錠剤をご所望です。」
Explanation: When communicating needs at a Japanese pharmacy, you need to evaluate three things simultaneously: accuracy of meaning, natural phrasing, and appropriate politeness level. A sentence can be grammatically correct but still sound unnatural or use the wrong register for a customer-pharmacist interaction. Option C — 「頭痛の薬が必要なのですが、妊娠中なので安全なものをお願いしたいです。また、液体より錠剤のほうが好ましいです。」— hits all three targets. It clearly states the headache need, logically links the pregnancy as a reason (〜なので) for requesting something safe, and expresses the tablet preference naturally using 〜のほうが好ましい, a polished but accessible expression. The tone is appropriately polite without being stiff or overly formal. Option A sounds unnatural because 「ご希望します」is incorrect — you cannot attach ご〜します to your own desires when speaking to someone else; the correct form would be 「希望いたします」or simply 「お願いしたいです」. The phrasing also feels fragmented and awkward in flow. Option B is too casual. 「〜ください」and 「〜いいです」work in everyday conversation, but for a pharmacy setting where you're discussing pregnancy and medication safety, this register feels slightly careless and may not convey the seriousness of the situation. Option D contains a critical grammatical error: 「お探しですが」implies you (the pharmacist) are searching for something, which completely misrepresents who needs the medicine. The subject is confused, making the sentence logically incoherent. As a study strategy, always check who is the grammatical subject in Japanese sentences — unclear or misplaced subjects are one of the most common traps in complex Japanese communication questions.

Question 6

A traveler is at a Japanese train station information window. She needs to explain that she wants to travel to Kyoto on a specific date, that she has a Japan Rail Pass and wants to know which trains are covered, and that she needs a seat reservation because she will be traveling with an infant. Which of the following correctly uses Japanese grammar to link these three pieces of information as a coherent, natural spoken explanation?

  1. 「来週月曜日に京都に行く予定ですが、ジャパンレールパスで乗れる電車を知りたいです。指定席が必要で、赤ちゃん連れのためです。」
  2. 「月曜日に京都へ行きます。ジャパンレールパスがありますが、どの電車ですか？赤ちゃんがいるので座席を指定したいです。」
  3. 「ジャパンレールパスを持っているので、来週月曜日に京都へ行けますか？赤ちゃんがいるし、どの指定席が対象の電車かも聞きたいです。」
  4. 「来週の月曜日に京都に行きたいのですが、ジャパンレールパスを持っておりまして、どの電車が対象になるか教えていただけますか？また、赤ちゃんと一緒なので、座席の指定もお願いしたいです。」 (correct answer)
Explanation: When communicating complex, multi-part requests in Japanese — especially in formal service settings like a train station — the key is evaluating register, logical flow, and grammatical connectors. A natural explanation should move smoothly from context → question → additional request, using polite language appropriate for speaking to station staff. Option D does this correctly. It opens with 「行きたいのですが」, a soft, polite expression of intent that signals more is coming. Then 「持っておりまして」 (humble form of 持っている) elegantly connects the Rail Pass information to the next question without breaking flow. The request 「教えていただけますか」 is appropriately formal and natural for asking staff for information. Finally, 「また」 smoothly introduces the reservation request, and 「お願いしたいです」 closes politely. Every piece of information is logically linked and the register is consistent throughout. Option A is grammatically functional but awkward. 「指定席が必要で、赤ちゃん連れのためです」 reverses the natural cause-effect order — you'd normally state the reason before the conclusion, not after it as an afterthought. Option B is too fragmented and casual. The sentences feel disconnected, and 「どの電車ですか？」 is vague and abrupt — it fails to clearly ask about Rail Pass coverage, leaving the staff guessing what you mean. Option C misuses 「ので」 by implying the Rail Pass is the reason she can travel to Kyoto, which is logically off. It also awkwardly combines the reservation and coverage questions with 「し」, making the request feel jumbled. Study tip: In Japanese service interactions, watch for how sentences are linked — connectors like 「のですが」, 「おりまして」, and 「また」 signal politeness and coherence simultaneously. Mastering these transitions will help you across many JLPT and real-world communication scenarios.

Question 7

Takeshi is writing a message to a Japanese homestay coordinator. He wants to explain that he has a dietary restriction (he does not eat pork for religious reasons), that he would prefer to do his own laundry rather than have the host family do it, and that he would like access to the kitchen to cook occasionally on weekends.

In drafting this message, Takeshi writes the following about his dietary restriction: 「宗教上の理由から、豚肉を おります。」 Which verb form correctly and most naturally fills the blank to complete this sentence in a formal written message?

  1. 食べないことにして
  2. 食べられないことにして
  3. 食べないようにして (correct answer)
  4. 食べないことになって
Explanation: When choosing between Japanese verb patterns like 〜ことにしている、〜ようにしている、and 〜ことになっている, ask yourself: who is the agent, and what is the nature of the habit or rule? 〜ようにしている (verb dictionary/negative form + ように + している) expresses a conscious, ongoing effort or personal policy — something you actively try to do or avoid as a habit you maintain. This fits Takeshi's situation perfectly: he personally and deliberately refrains from eating pork as an ongoing practice. So C)「食べないようにしている」 is the most natural choice, conveying "I make it a point not to eat pork" with appropriate humility and effort-based framing. A)「食べないことにして」 uses 〜ことにする, which describes the moment of deciding something. Without the いる form, it implies a one-time decision being made now, not an established habit — it sounds like he's just now resolving to stop, which is unnatural here. B)「食べられないことにして」 uses the potential negative 食べられない ("cannot eat"), combined with ことにする. This suggests he is pretending or acting as if he cannot eat pork, which implies deception — clearly not the intended meaning. D)「食べないことになって」 uses 〜ことになる, which expresses outcomes decided by external forces or circumstances (e.g., rules imposed from outside). Since this is Takeshi's personal religious choice, not an externally imposed rule, this pattern is inappropriate. Study tip: Remember the contrast — 〜ことにする = personal decision (made once), 〜ようにする = ongoing personal effort, 〜ことになる = outcome from external circumstances. This distinction appears frequently in intermediate Japanese grammar questions.

Question 8

A business traveler needs to explain to a Japanese colleague that she cannot attend a scheduled meeting because she must catch an earlier flight due to a family emergency, and she wants to ask whether the meeting can be rescheduled. Which of the following most appropriately conveys this full message in a formal business email?

  1. 「急用が生じたため、予定していた会議に出席することが難しくなりました。家族の緊急事態により、早い便に変更する必要があるためです。会議の日程を変更していただくことは可能でしょうか。」 (correct answer)
  2. 「会議に行けなくなりました。家族に緊急のことがあって、早い飛行機に乗らないといけないです。大変申し訳ありませんが、会議を別の日にしてもらえますか。」
  3. 「家族が緊急事態になったので、早い便に乗ることになりました。そのため会議に出席できません。ご迷惑をおかけしますが、日程の変更をお願いします。」
  4. 「誠に申し訳ございませんが、個人的な事情で会議への参加が困難となりました。詳細は後日ご連絡いたしますが、日時の調整をご検討いただければ幸いです。フライトの都合上、早急に対応が必要な状況です。」
Explanation: When writing formal business emails in Japanese, you need to balance three elements: keigo (敬語) — polite/formal language — clear logical structure, and complete information. A business email to a colleague should avoid casual speech endings, vague expressions, or information that creates confusion about next steps. Option A succeeds on all fronts. It opens with 「急用が生じたため」 (an urgent matter has arisen), explains the specific reason (family emergency requiring an earlier flight), and closes with the polite question form 「〜していただくことは可能でしょうか」 — a textbook example of formal, indirect request-making in Japanese business writing. The logical flow is clean and the register is consistent throughout. Option B fails because of its casual register. Phrases like 「行けなくなりました」, 「乗らないといけないです」, and 「してもらえますか」 are conversational — inappropriate for a formal business email to a colleague. The grammar is correct but the tone is wrong. Option C is slightly more polished than B but still falls short. 「〜ことになりました」 sounds somewhat passive and indirect in a way that obscures personal responsibility, and 「お願いします」 as a closing request lacks the softening layer expected in formal business Japanese compared to A's 「可能でしょうか」. Option D uses beautifully formal keigo throughout, but it withholds key information — it never mentions the flight or specifies that the reason is a family emergency, only vaguely referencing 「個人的な事情」. In business communication, vagueness about the reason can seem evasive. Your study tip: always check that formal Japanese emails are both keigo-appropriate and informationally complete — neither alone is sufficient.