Conversational Japanese Quiz: Conversation Flow Phrases
10 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Conversation Flow PhrasesQuestion 1 of 10

A language learner reads that Japanese conversation often uses 'aizuchi' (相槌) to show active listening. However, the learner is confused about the difference between aizuchi and simply saying 'はい' (hai) repeatedly. Which statement MOST accurately distinguishes effective use of aizuchi as a conversation-flow tool from less effective listener responses?

Effective aizuchi are only used when the speaker pauses at the end of a sentence, while 'はい' should be inserted continuously throughout the speaker's turns to confirm understanding after every clause or sentence.
Effective aizuchi vary in expression — using phrases like 'そうですか,' 'なるほど,' and 'へえ' — showing genuine engagement, while repeating only 'はい' can sound mechanical and may signal inattentiveness or disinterest to the speaker.
Effective aizuchi fully replace the need for follow-up questions, since a varied set of listener responses like 'なるほど' and 'そうですか' conveys complete engagement and understanding without any further verbal contribution from the listener.
Effective aizuchi such as 'なるほど' and 'そうですか' are formal expressions reserved for business or academic Japanese, while 'はい' remains the only aizuchi appropriate for casual introductory-level conversation between peers or classmates.
← Back to quizzes

Conversational Japanese Quiz

Conversational Japanese Quiz: Conversation Flow Phrases

Practice Conversation Flow Phrases in Conversational Japanese with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Conversation Flow Phrases, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Conversational Japanese.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A language learner reads that Japanese conversation often uses 'aizuchi' (相槌) to show active listening. However, the learner is confused about the difference between aizuchi and simply saying 'はい' (hai) repeatedly. Which statement MOST accurately distinguishes effective use of aizuchi as a conversation-flow tool from less effective listener responses?

  1. Effective aizuchi are only used when the speaker pauses at the end of a sentence, while 'はい' should be inserted continuously throughout the speaker's turns to confirm understanding after every clause or sentence.
  2. Effective aizuchi vary in expression — using phrases like 'そうですか,' 'なるほど,' and 'へえ' — showing genuine engagement, while repeating only 'はい' can sound mechanical and may signal inattentiveness or disinterest to the speaker. (correct answer)
  3. Effective aizuchi fully replace the need for follow-up questions, since a varied set of listener responses like 'なるほど' and 'そうですか' conveys complete engagement and understanding without any further verbal contribution from the listener.
  4. Effective aizuchi such as 'なるほど' and 'そうですか' are formal expressions reserved for business or academic Japanese, while 'はい' remains the only aizuchi appropriate for casual introductory-level conversation between peers or classmates.
Explanation: When studying Japanese conversation, it helps to understand that aizuchi (相槌) are not just polite filler — they are active signals that show a listener is emotionally and intellectually engaged. The key question here is: what makes aizuchi effective versus merely mechanical? Effective aizuchi work precisely because they vary based on context. Expressions like そうですか (is that so?), なるほど (I see/that makes sense), and へえ (oh, really?) each communicate a different emotional nuance — surprise, understanding, or genuine curiosity. This variety reassures the speaker that you are truly processing what they say. Repeating only はい over and over, while technically a valid response, loses this nuance quickly and can actually make you seem less engaged, not more. This is why B is correct — it accurately captures how varied expression signals genuine listening, while mechanical repetition undermines that impression. A is backwards in its logic. Effective aizuchi are actually sprinkled throughout a speaker's turn at natural pause points — not held until the very end. Reserving responses only for sentence endings would disrupt natural conversational flow. C overstates what aizuchi can accomplish. While varied responses show engagement, they do not replace follow-up questions or further contribution. Real conversation requires active participation beyond backchanneling alone. D is a misconception about register. Expressions like なるほど and そうですか are commonly used in both casual and formal settings — they are not restricted to business or academic Japanese. Study tip: Think of aizuchi as an emotional dial — the range of expressions you use shows how carefully you're listening. Varying your responses is the goal.

Question 2

Hiroshi is chatting with his new neighbor, Yuki. Yuki says: '週末は何をしますか？(Shūmatsu wa nani o shimasu ka?)' Hiroshi wants to answer and then ask a follow-up question to keep the conversation going.

Hiroshi answers that he usually plays soccer. Which of the following BEST demonstrates the use of a conversation-flow functional chunk to maintain the dialogue after his answer?

  1. たいていサッカーをします。ゆきさんは？ (Taitei sakkā o shimasu. Yuki-san wa?) (correct answer)
  2. サッカーが好きです。サッカーはとてもいいスポーツです。日本でも人気です。 (Sakkā ga suki desu. Sakkā wa totemo ii supōtsu desu. Nihon demo ninki desu.)
  3. たいていサッカーをします。でも、あまり上手じゃないです。練習が嫌いです。 (Taitei sakkā o shimasu. Demo, amari jōzu ja nai desu. Renshū ga kirai desu.)
  4. 週末は忙しいです。時間がありません。サッカーもします。 (Shūmatsu wa isogashii desu. Jikan ga arimasen. Sakkā mo shimasu.)
Explanation: When you're having a conversation in Japanese, it's not enough to just answer a question — skilled speakers use conversation-flow functional chunks (会話をつなぐ表現) to keep the dialogue moving naturally. These are short, formulaic phrases that invite the other person to share their own thoughts, signaling that you're interested and engaged. The most classic example is simply turning the question back: 「〜さんは？」 ("What about you, [name]?"). Option A does exactly this. Hiroshi answers clearly — 「たいていサッカーをします」("I usually play soccer") — and then uses 「ゆきさんは？」to bounce the conversation back to Yuki. This is a textbook example of a functional chunk that maintains dialogue flow efficiently and naturally. Option B makes the mistake of monologuing. Instead of inviting Yuki to participate, Hiroshi launches into a series of opinions about soccer being a great sport in Japan. This closes off the conversation rather than opening it. Option C is a self-deprecating tangent — Hiroshi says he's not skilled and dislikes practice. While this might be relatable, it doesn't include any functional chunk to redirect the conversation toward Yuki, so the dialogue stalls. Option D is disorganized and even contradictory. Saying he's busy with no time, then mentioning soccer almost as an afterthought, creates a confusing response with no conversational hook to keep things going. A good study tip: whenever you answer a question in Japanese conversation, train yourself to add 「〜さんは？」or 「あなたは？」right after. It's a small phrase with a big social function — and exams love testing it.

Question 3

Tomoko and Ben are having their first conversation at a language exchange event. Ben says something in Japanese that Tomoko does not understand. She understands the topic is about weekend plans but missed the specific details. She wants to clarify without completely stopping the flow of conversation.

Which phrase would MOST effectively allow Tomoko to seek clarification while keeping the conversational atmosphere comfortable and cooperative?

  1. ああ、そうですか。なるほど、よくわかりました。それはいいですね。 (Aa, sou desu ka. Naruhodo, yoku wakarimashita. Sore wa ii desu ne.)
  2. 何ですか？よくわかりませんでした。もう一度最初から全部言ってください。 (Nan desu ka? Yoku wakarimasendeshita. Mou ichido saisho kara zenbu itte kudasai.)
  3. すみません、わかりません。日本語はまだ難しいです。英語で話してもいいですか？ (Sumimasen, wakarimasen. Nihongo wa mada muzukashii desu. Eigo de hanashite mo ii desu ka?)
  4. すみません、「週末」の部分はわかりましたが、もう少し詳しく教えていただけますか？ (Sumimasen, 'shūmatsu' no bubun wa wakarimashita ga, mou sukoshi kuwashiku oshiete itadakemasu ka?) (correct answer)
Explanation: When navigating clarification in Japanese conversation, the key skill being tested here is pragmatic competence — choosing language that is socially appropriate for the situation, not just grammatically correct. Ask yourself: does this phrase acknowledge what was understood, request only what's missing, and maintain the cooperative tone of a first meeting? Choice D does all three beautifully. The phrase 「週末」の部分はわかりましたが ("I understood the 'weekend' part, but...") shows active listening and partial comprehension, which validates Ben's effort. Then もう少し詳しく教えていただけますか uses the humble-request form いただけますか to ask gently for more detail — polite, specific, and non-disruptive. This is the correct approach. Choice A fails because よくわかりました ("I understood well") is a false confirmation — Tomoko is pretending she understood when she didn't. This might seem polite, but it actually derails communication entirely. Choice B is grammatically blunt and socially abrasive. Asking Ben to repeat 最初から全部 ("everything from the beginning") is an overreaction to a partial misunderstanding, and the phrasing lacks the softening politeness markers expected in a first conversation with a stranger. Choice C, while honest, gives up on Japanese entirely by switching to English. In a language exchange context, this defeats the purpose of the event and could make Ben feel his Japanese efforts were wasted. Study tip: In Japanese communication questions, watch for phrases that balance 謙遜 (humility), 明確さ (clarity), and 配慮 (consideration for others). Clarification should be specific, not global — acknowledge what you did understand before asking about what you didn't.

Question 4

In a Japanese conversation class, students are taught that certain phrases function as 'backchannels' — short responses that show the listener is engaged without interrupting the speaker. Which of the following sets of expressions is MOST accurately described as backchannel phrases used to sustain conversational flow in Japanese?

  1. はい、そうですか、なるほど (Hai, sou desu ka, naruhodo) (correct answer)
  2. すみません、ありがとう、どういたしまして (Sumimasen, arigatou, douitashimashite)
  3. おはようございます、こんにちは、さようなら (Ohayou gozaimasu, konnichiwa, sayounara)
  4. どうぞ、ください、いただきます (Douzo, kudasai, itadakimasu)
Explanation: When studying Japanese conversation, it helps to understand the concept of あいづち (aizuchi) — the backchannels Japanese speakers use to signal active listening without taking over the conversation. These are short, reactive phrases that keep the dialogue flowing naturally. Answer A contains the classic aizuchi expressions. はい (hai) signals acknowledgment ("yes/I hear you"), そうですか (sou desu ka) expresses mild surprise or interest ("Is that so?"), and なるほど (naruhodo) conveys genuine understanding ("I see/that makes sense"). Native Japanese speakers use these constantly while listening, and mastering them makes you sound far more natural in conversation. The other options each represent a distinct — but unrelated — category of expressions. B (すみません、ありがとう、どういたしまして) contains social ritual phrases: apology, gratitude, and its response. These are transactional, not conversational sustainers. C (おはようございます、こんにちは、さようなら) is a set of greetings and farewells — phrases that open or close interactions rather than sustain them mid-conversation. D (どうぞ、ください、いただきます) groups together request and offering expressions, often tied to giving/receiving situations like meals or handing something over — again, not backchannels. A useful study tip: when a question asks about conversational function, sort the vocabulary by what role it plays — greeting, request, gratitude, or real-time listener response. Backchannels are always the ones that signal "I'm following you — keep going." Memorizing aizuchi as a dedicated category will help you both on exams and in real Japanese conversations.

Question 5

A student is practicing conversational Japanese and wants to express that she did not fully hear what her partner said, but she wants to do so in a way that encourages the partner to repeat themselves without making the interaction feel awkward. Which phrase is the MOST appropriate functional chunk for this purpose?

  1. もう一度言ってください。よく聞こえませんでした。 (Mou ichido itte kudasai. Yoku kikoemasendeshita.)
  2. すみません、もう少しゆっくり言っていただけますか？ (Sumimasen, mou sukoshi yukkuri itte itadakemasu ka?) (correct answer)
  3. え？何ですか？すみませんが、わかりませんでした。 (E? Nan desu ka? Sumimasen ga, wakarimasendeshita.)
  4. ちょっと待ってください。今、少し忙しいです。 (Chotto matte kudasai. Ima, sukoshi isogashii desu.)
Explanation: When navigating real conversations in Japanese, the key skill being tested here is pragmatic appropriateness — choosing language that accomplishes your communicative goal while maintaining social harmony (和, wa). Asking someone to repeat themselves can feel embarrassing for both parties, so Japanese learners must balance clarity with politeness. Option B, すみません、もう少しゆっくり言っていただけますか？, is the ideal choice because it does several things simultaneously: it opens with an apology (sumimasen) to soften the interruption, uses もう少し ("a little more") to make the request feel modest, and employs 〜ていただけますか — a highly polite, indirect request form meaning "could you please do me the favor of...?" This phrasing invites cooperation rather than demanding it, keeping the conversation comfortable and natural. Option A is grammatically correct but socially blunt. Saying "please say it again — I couldn't hear you" in two short, direct sentences lacks the softening politeness markers that Japanese communication often requires in social settings. Option C opens with え？ (a surprised "huh?"), which can come across as rude or dismissive, and わかりませんでした ("I didn't understand") addresses comprehension rather than the issue of not hearing. Option D is completely off-topic — it asks the partner to wait because you're busy, which addresses a different situation entirely and would confuse the conversation. As a study tip, pay close attention to request politeness levels in Japanese: the pattern 〜ていただけますか is your go-to for polite, face-saving requests in both conversation and exam scenarios.

Question 6

Riku is in a conversation with his classmate Sora. Riku has just finished talking about his favorite food. There is a brief pause. Riku wants to move the conversation forward without it feeling abrupt or forced.

Which phrase would MOST naturally serve as a bridge to introduce a new but related topic and keep the conversation flowing at an introductory level?

  1. それから、私はもっと話したいです。聞いてください。 (Sorekara, watashi wa motto hanashitai desu. Kiite kudasai.)
  2. はい、わかりました。もう終わりにしましょう。 (Hai, wakarimashita. Mou owari ni shimashou.)
  3. ところで、ソラさんは料理が好きですか？ (Tokoro de, Sora-san wa ryōri ga suki desu ka?) (correct answer)
  4. えーと、そうですね…。あ、もういいです。 (Eeto, sou desu ne…. A, mou ii desu.)
Explanation: When a conversation hits a natural pause, Japanese speakers often use transition phrases to smoothly shift topics without sounding abrupt. This question tests whether you recognize those conversational connectors at a beginner level. The phrase in C, ところで (tokoro de), is a classic topic-changing expression meaning "by the way" or "speaking of which." It signals a gentle pivot — Riku is moving from his favorite food to asking Sora about cooking (料理が好きですか), a related and natural follow-up. The question form makes it interactive and keeps Sora engaged, which is exactly what a good conversation bridge should do. C is the correct answer. A fails because それから (sorekara) means "and then" — it implies continuing the same topic, not introducing a new one. Worse, saying "please listen to me" (聞いてください) sounds demanding and unnatural in casual conversation, especially at this level. B is the opposite of keeping conversation flowing. もう終わりにしましょう means "let's end it now" — Riku would be shutting the conversation down entirely, which contradicts the goal of bridging to a new topic. D is a string of filler words (えーと、そうですね) followed by もういいです, which roughly means "never mind" or "forget it." This sounds confused and dismissive, not like a natural conversational transition at all. Study tip: Memorize a small set of Japanese transition words — ところで (topic change), それから (continuing), でも (contrast) — and practice recognizing which situation each one fits. These appear frequently in conversation-based questions.

Question 7

Two beginners are role-playing a Japanese conversation. Student A says: '私は音楽が好きです。特にポップスが好きです。(Watashi wa ongaku ga suki desu. Toku ni poppusu ga suki desu.)' Student B wants to express agreement, add a brief personal comment, and then invite Student A to say more — all in one short response.

Which response by Student B BEST accomplishes all three goals — agreement, personal input, and inviting continuation — using appropriate introductory-level conversation-flow phrases?

  1. なるほど。私はポップスより演歌の方が好きです。あなたはどんな音楽が好きですか？ (Naruhodo. Watashi wa poppusu yori enka no hou ga suki desu. Anata wa donna ongaku ga suki desu ka?)
  2. そうですか。音楽はいいですね。でも、私はあまり聞きません。 (Sou desu ka. Ongaku wa ii desu ne. Demo, watashi wa amari kikimasen.)
  3. 私もポップスが好きです！どんな歌手が好きですか？ (Watashi mo poppusu ga suki desu! Donna kashu ga suki desu ka?) (correct answer)
  4. へえ、そうですか。私もポップスが好きです。でも、音楽の話はもう終わりにしましょう。 (Hee, sou desu ka. Watashi mo poppusu ga suki desu. Demo, ongaku no hanashi wa mou owari ni shimashou.)
Explanation: When evaluating Japanese conversation responses, ask yourself three things: Does it show agreement? Does it add personal input? Does it invite the other person to keep talking? All three must be present for a response to "flow" naturally in a real conversation. Choice C — 私もポップスが好きです！どんな歌手が好きですか？ — hits all three targets cleanly. The word も (mo) meaning "also/too" signals agreement by echoing Student A's love of pop music. Then the same sentence doubles as personal input, since Student B is genuinely sharing their own preference. Finally, どんな歌手が好きですか？ ("What kind of singers do you like?") is a natural, open-ended follow-up question that invites Student A to continue. This is exactly how introductory-level Japanese conversation is supposed to flow. Choice A uses なるほど (I see) and adds a comparison using より～の方が (prefer X over Y), which is more complex grammar. Crucially, its closing question asks what kind of music Student A likes — but Student A already answered that, so it sounds like Student B wasn't listening. Choice B uses そうですか (is that so?) which can feel dismissive rather than agreeing, and then ends with "I don't listen much" — completely shutting down the conversation instead of inviting more. Choice D starts promisingly with agreement, but then 音楽の話はもう終わりにしましょう ("Let's end the music talk now") actively kills the conversation — the opposite of continuation. Study tip: In Japanese conversation questions, watch for responses that close topics versus open them. A question ending in か？ is usually your signal that the speaker is inviting continuation.

Question 8

Two students, Kenji and Maria, are having a conversation at school for the first time. Maria says: 'I heard you just moved here from Osaka. How do you like it so far?' Kenji wants to respond positively but also show he is still getting used to things.

Which response best allows Kenji to keep the conversation flowing naturally while conveying that he is adjusting to his new surroundings?

  1. そうですね、まだ慣れていませんが、とても楽しいです。あなたはどうですか？ (Sou desu ne, mada narete imasen ga, totemo tanoshii desu. Anata wa dou desu ka?) (correct answer)
  2. はい、そうです。大阪はよかったです。東京はあまり好きじゃないです。 (Hai, sou desu. Osaka wa yokatta desu. Tokyo wa amari suki ja nai desu.)
  3. わかりません。まだ何も見ていません。友達もいません。 (Wakarimasen. Mada nani mo mite imasen. Tomodachi mo imasen.)
  4. そうですね、大阪はとても好きでした。でも、もう話したくないです。 (Sou desu ne, Osaka wa totemo suki deshita. Demo, mou hanashitakunai desu.)
Explanation: When answering conversation-flow questions in Japanese, ask yourself two things: Does the response match the emotional tone requested? And does it invite further dialogue? Kenji needs to sound positive yet honest about adjusting, while keeping the exchange going naturally. Option A achieves exactly this. 「まだ慣れていません」("I'm not used to it yet") honestly acknowledges the adjustment period, while 「とても楽しいです」("it's very fun") maintains a positive tone. Most importantly, 「あなたはどうですか？」("How about you?") bounces the question back to Maria, which is a natural, polite way to continue a conversation — especially when meeting someone for the first time. Option B is problematic because 「東京はあまり好きじゃないです」("I don't really like Tokyo") expresses a negative opinion about the new city with no balance or warmth. This shuts down the positive energy of the exchange and would likely make the conversation awkward, not flowing. Option C falls into a trap of being overly negative and listing complaints — no friends, seen nothing, doesn't know. While these feelings might be real, expressing all of them bluntly to someone you just met is socially inappropriate in Japanese communication, which tends to favor restraint and positivity with new acquaintances. Option D is the most socially damaging choice. Saying 「もう話したくないです」("I don't want to talk anymore") directly ends the conversation and would be considered very rude in any social context. A useful tip: in Japanese conversation questions, look for responses that use が (but) to balance two ideas and end with a question — these structures signal natural, considerate dialogue.

Question 9

During a conversation practice session, two students are roleplaying meeting each other at a university club fair. Student A says: '私は写真部に入りたいです。あなたは？(Watashi wa shashin-bu ni hairitai desu. Anata wa?)' Student B is interested in the drama club but is not yet sure.

Student B wants to express uncertainty while keeping the conversation engaged. Which response BEST demonstrates an appropriate introductory-level functional chunk for this conversational purpose?

  1. えーと、演劇部かな…と思っています。まだよくわかりません。あなたは写真が好きですか？ (Eeto, engeki-bu kana… to omotte imasu. Mada yoku wakarimasen. Anata wa shashin ga suki desu ka?) (correct answer)
  2. わかりません。何もしたくないです。クラブはあまり好きじゃないです。 (Wakarimasen. Nani mo shitakunai desu. Kurabu wa amari suki ja nai desu.)
  3. 演劇部です。絶対に入ります。あなたの写真部には興味がありません。 (Engeki-bu desu. Zettai ni hairimasu. Anata no shashin-bu ni wa kyōmi ga arimasen.)
  4. えーと、演劇部です。でも、もう話したくないです。後で教えます。 (Eeto, engeki-bu desu. Demo, mou hanashitakunai desu. Ato de oshiemasu.)
Explanation: When practicing conversational Japanese, you need to balance expressing uncertainty with keeping the dialogue alive. At the introductory level, this means using functional chunks — set phrases that serve a clear social purpose — like hedging expressions and follow-up questions. Answer A does exactly this. It opens with えーと (eeto, "um…") to signal hesitation naturally, uses かな…と思っています (kana… to omotte imasu) to express tentative thinking, acknowledges uncertainty with まだよくわかりません (mada yoku wakarimasen, "I don't quite know yet"), and then bounces the conversation back with a question about Student A's interest in photography. This is a complete, socially appropriate response that moves the conversation forward. B fails the task entirely. While わかりません expresses uncertainty, the student then adds 何もしたくないです ("I don't want to do anything") and dismisses clubs altogether — this shuts down the conversation rather than engaging with it, and contradicts the scenario where Student B is interested in the drama club. C overcorrects in the opposite direction. The student states certainty (絶対に入ります, "I will definitely join") and even dismisses Student A's interest ("I'm not interested in your photography club"). This shows no uncertainty and is socially abrupt. D starts reasonably with えーと, 演劇部です, but then says もう話したくないです ("I don't want to talk anymore"), which is conversationally rude and defeats the purpose of keeping the exchange going. A useful tip: in Japanese conversation practice, always check whether a response opens or closes the dialogue. Polite engagement almost always involves redirecting with a question.

Question 10

A student learning Japanese is told that 'conversation fillers' and 'topic-transition phrases' are both tools for maintaining conversational flow, but they serve different functions. Which pairing CORRECTLY matches each phrase type with an accurate example and its conversational function?

  1. Filler: 'なるほど' (naruhodo) — used to hold the floor while thinking; Transition: 'そうですね' (sou desu ne) — used to smoothly introduce a completely unrelated topic.
  2. Filler: 'ところで' (tokoro de) — used to hold the floor while thinking; Transition: 'えーと' (eeto) — used to smoothly shift to a new topic without ending the conversation.
  3. Filler: 'えーと' (eeto) — used to signal disagreement politely; Transition: 'ところで' (tokoro de) — used to summarize what was just said before ending the conversation.
  4. Filler: 'えーと' (eeto) — used to hold the floor while thinking; Transition: 'ところで' (tokoro de) — used to smoothly shift to a new topic without ending the conversation. (correct answer)
Explanation: When studying Japanese conversation, it helps to separate two distinct tools: fillers (つなぎ言葉) buy you time mid-thought without giving up your turn, while topic-transition phrases actively redirect the conversation toward a new subject. Keeping this functional difference clear will help you answer questions like this one. えーと (eeto) is a classic filler — the Japanese equivalent of "um" or "uh." You use it when you're searching for words, holding the conversational floor so your listener knows you're still thinking. It signals hesitation, not direction. ところで (tokoro de), on the other hand, translates roughly to "by the way" and is a standard topic-transition phrase. It lets you pivot smoothly to a new subject without awkwardly ending the conversation. Together, these two make D the correct pairing. Looking at the wrong choices: A misidentifies なるほど (naruhodo), which actually means "I see" or "indeed" — it's a back-channel response showing comprehension, not a floor-holding filler. It also incorrectly describes そうですね as introducing unrelated topics; that phrase is used for agreement or gentle acknowledgment. B swaps the two target words entirely, labeling ところで as a filler and えーと as a transition — the opposite of their real functions. C compounds errors by claiming えーと signals disagreement, which is completely wrong; it expresses hesitation, not opposition. A useful memory trick: think of えーと as "buying time" (like a stutter) and ところで as "changing lanes" in a conversation. Fillers pause; transitions pivot.