Home

Tutoring

Subjects

Live Classes

Study Coach

Essay Review

On-Demand Courses

Colleges

Games

Opening subject page...

Loading your content

GRE Verbal

GRE Verbal Practice Test: Practice Test 10

Practice Test 10 for GRE Verbal: real questions and explanations from the Varsity Tutors practice-test pool.

0%

0 / 25 answered

Question 1 of 25

Read the passage and answer the question.

In archaeology, some researchers propose that ancient trade networks can be reconstructed primarily through geochemical “fingerprinting” of artifacts, matching trace elements to specific source regions. The technique has sharpened debates that once relied heavily on stylistic comparison, and it can sometimes rule out long-assumed origins. However, the confidence with which provenance maps are occasionally presented exceeds what the data warrant. Source signatures can overlap, artifacts may be recycled or mixed, and sampling strategies often privilege sites that are already well studied. Geochemical methods are powerful tools, but they are most persuasive when integrated with contextual evidence—settlement patterns, historical records, and stratigraphy—rather than when treated as self-sufficient arbiters of past exchange.

The passage conveys an attitude that is primarily…

Question Navigator

All questions

Question 1

Read the passage and answer the question.

In archaeology, some researchers propose that ancient trade networks can be reconstructed primarily through geochemical “fingerprinting” of artifacts, matching trace elements to specific source regions. The technique has sharpened debates that once relied heavily on stylistic comparison, and it can sometimes rule out long-assumed origins. However, the confidence with which provenance maps are occasionally presented exceeds what the data warrant. Source signatures can overlap, artifacts may be recycled or mixed, and sampling strategies often privilege sites that are already well studied. Geochemical methods are powerful tools, but they are most persuasive when integrated with contextual evidence—settlement patterns, historical records, and stratigraphy—rather than when treated as self-sufficient arbiters of past exchange.

The passage conveys an attitude that is primarily…

  1. Uncritical admiration for geochemical methods as the definitive solution to provenance debates
  2. Balanced appreciation combined with caution about overconfident conclusions (correct answer)
  3. Furious denunciation of traditional archaeology as unscientific
  4. Purely neutral cataloging of techniques with no implied preference
  5. Dismissive rejection, claiming chemical analysis cannot contribute meaningfully to archaeology

Explanation: This question tests the reader's ability to identify the author's tone toward geochemical fingerprinting in archaeology. Tone is conveyed through diction and emphasis, appreciating sharpening of debates while cautioning overconfidence. The passage states the technique 'has sharpened debates' and can rule out origins but warns that 'confidence...exceeds what the data warrant' due to overlaps and sampling biases. It further advocates integration with contextual evidence rather than self-sufficiency. Therefore, choice B reflects this balanced appreciation with caution about conclusions. Choice A is an extreme distractor, implying uncritical admiration as definitive, ignoring the author's concerns on limitations. Choice E fails by rejecting contributions, contradicting the passage's view of powerful tools.

Question 2

An environmental organization argues that a coastal town should restrict nighttime beachfront lighting during sea turtle nesting season. The organization cites monitoring data showing that on beaches with bright artificial lighting, a larger proportion of hatchlings crawl inland rather than toward the ocean. It also notes that neighboring towns that adopted lighting restrictions reported higher hatchling survival rates in subsequent seasons. The organization concludes that limiting nighttime lighting will improve local sea turtle hatchling survival.

The author relies on which of the following as a premise?

  1. Limiting nighttime beachfront lighting will improve local sea turtle hatchling survival.
  2. The town's beaches are popular with tourists during the summer months.
  3. Monitoring data show that on brightly lit beaches, more hatchlings crawl inland rather than toward the ocean. (correct answer)
  4. Residents will support the restrictions as long as they do not affect property values.
  5. Nighttime lighting restrictions will also reduce electricity bills for every household in town.

Explanation: This question asks you to identify premises or evidence that the author relies on. A premise is a factual statement used to support the argument's conclusion. The conclusion is that limiting nighttime beachfront lighting will improve local sea turtle hatchling survival. The Correct answer (C) presents monitoring data showing that more hatchlings crawl inland on brightly lit beaches, which the organization explicitly cites as evidence. This behavioral data serves as a premise because it demonstrates how artificial lighting disrupts hatchling navigation, supporting the need for lighting restrictions. Choice (A) merely restates the conclusion rather than providing a reason for it, which is why it's incorrect.

Question 3

Select the answer choice that best completes the sentence. The manager promised to simplify reporting, yet the revised form is even more  , adding new sections that duplicate information already collected elsewhere.

  1. streamlined
  2. optional
  3. succinct
  4. cumbersome (correct answer)
  5. transparent

Explanation: This question tests logical fit in Text Completion through a contrast between promise and outcome. The sentence establishes irony with 'yet'—the manager promised simplification but delivered the opposite, adding duplicative sections. The Dorrect answer 'cumbersome' (B) captures how the form became more burdensome and unwieldy, directly contradicting the promise to simplify. This word satisfies the logic by indicating increased complexity and difficulty. 'Streamlined' (A) or 'succinct' (C) would have the wrong polarity—they suggest simplification actually occurred, contradicting the stated addition of redundant sections.

Question 4

Read the passage and answer the question.

In an analysis of urban tree planting, the nonprofit CanopyWorks compared survival rates for saplings planted in two different years. In 2016, the group planted 1,200 saplings across 18 sites and contracted watering to a private vendor for the first 12 weeks after planting. In 2019, it planted 1,050 saplings across 20 sites but relied on volunteer watering teams, who followed a schedule of twice-weekly watering for 10 weeks. A follow-up inspection conducted exactly 24 months after each planting found that 2016 plantings had a 64% survival rate, while 2019 plantings had a 58% survival rate. The report noted that the 2019 summer had 11 days above 35°C, compared with 4 such days in 2016. It also stated that soil compaction was measured at only five sites in 2019 and was not measured at all in 2016.

The passage states that…

  1. Soil compaction was measured at all 20 sites in 2019 and at all 18 sites in 2016.
  2. The 2019 plantings had a 64% survival rate at the 24-month inspection.
  3. The follow-up inspection occurred 12 months after each planting.
  4. In 2016, CanopyWorks planted 1,200 saplings across 18 sites. (correct answer)
  5. Volunteer watering teams in 2019 watered daily for 12 weeks.

Explanation: This question tests detail comprehension by asking what the passage states. Correct answers in such questions restate explicit information from the text without adding inferences or external knowledge. The relevant detail is located in the second sentence, which describes the 2016 planting efforts. This sentence indicates that in 2016, CanopyWorks planted 1,200 saplings across 18 sites. Choice D matches this text directly by repeating the year, the number of saplings, and the number of sites. A representative distractor, such as choice B, fails because it misstates the survival rate for the wrong year; the passage attributes the 64% rate to 2016, not 2019. Additionally, choice B implies a 24-month inspection for 2019, but the passage confirms 24 months for both years.

Question 5

Read the passage and answer the question.

A public health report summarizes a 2018–2020 evaluation of a county-level naloxone distribution program. The county partnered with 14 pharmacies and 6 community organizations to provide naloxone kits at no cost. The passage explicitly states that each kit contained two 4-mg intranasal doses and an instruction card written at an eighth-grade reading level. Distribution records show that 8,420 kits were provided in 2019 and 9,105 kits in 2020; the report notes that 2018 data were excluded from year-to-year comparisons because the program began in September 2018. To assess reach, the evaluators conducted a telephone survey of 600 residents in early 2021 and report that 18% of respondents had heard of the program. The passage also states that pharmacies were reimbursed $12 per kit dispensed and that community organizations received a separate annual stipend, though the stipend amount is not provided.

According to the passage, which of the following is true?

  1. Each naloxone kit contained two 2-mg intranasal doses.
  2. The program partnered with 20 pharmacies.
  3. Pharmacies were reimbursed $12 per kit dispensed. (correct answer)
  4. Exactly 18% of county residents received a naloxone kit in 2020.
  5. The annual stipend amount paid to community organizations was $12,000.

Explanation: This question requires identifying a detail explicitly stated in the passage. The correct answer must reflect information presented directly in the text rather than implied or inferred. The passage explicitly states that "pharmacies were reimbursed $12 per kit dispensed," making option C the correct answer. This financial detail about the reimbursement structure is presented as a factual statement about the program's operations. Option D is incorrect because the passage states that 18% of survey respondents had heard of the program, not that 18% of county residents received a naloxone kit.

Question 6

A city’s transportation office reports that after installing adaptive traffic-signal software on three major corridors last year, average commute times on those corridors fell by 12%. The office concludes that expanding the same software to all intersections citywide will reduce overall city commute times by a similar amount. The office notes that the three corridors were selected because they are among the busiest in the city and argues that improvements there indicate the software’s effectiveness in general. Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?

  1. Several neighborhoods not located near the three corridors have recently requested additional pedestrian crossings at intersections.
  2. During the year the software was installed, a major employer on one of the three corridors shifted 30% of its workforce to remote work, reducing peak-hour traffic volume on that corridor. (correct answer)
  3. The adaptive software requires annual licensing fees that are higher than the fees for the city’s current signal-timing system.
  4. On a few minor streets that intersect the three corridors, drivers reported slightly longer waits at red lights after the software was installed.
  5. In a nearby city, a different brand of adaptive traffic-signal software produced mixed results when first introduced.

Explanation: This question tests your ability to weaken an argument about the effectiveness of adaptive traffic-signal software. Weakening an argument means finding information that reduces support for the conclusion that expanding the software citywide will reduce overall commute times. The argument assumes that the 12% improvement on three corridors occurred because of the software itself, not due to other factors. The Borrect answer (B) undermines this assumption by revealing that a major employer shifted 30% of its workforce to remote work on one corridor, which would naturally reduce traffic and commute times regardless of the software. This alternative explanation for the improvement suggests the software may not be as effective as claimed. Choice A about pedestrian crossings is irrelevant to the software's effectiveness on traffic flow, while choice C about licensing fees doesn't address whether the software actually works.

Question 7

Read the passage and answer the question.

In recent years, some legal scholars have advocated for “algorithmic sentencing” tools that estimate recidivism risk to guide judges. Supporters argue that statistical models can reduce idiosyncratic disparities by making decisions more consistent. Yet the apparent objectivity of such tools can be misleading: the models are trained on historical data shaped by policing patterns, charging practices, and plea bargaining, all of which embed prior inequities. Additionally, the choice of outcome variables—rearrest, reconviction, or violation—quietly encodes normative judgments about what counts as reoffending. Risk scores may help structure discretion, but they can also launder contested values through technical vocabulary, making policy choices harder to contest in public terms.

The passage conveys an attitude that is primarily…​

  1. Cautiously critical, warning that technical tools may obscure normative and historical biases (correct answer)
  2. Celebratory, portraying algorithmic sentencing as a straightforward fix for injustice
  3. Neutral and purely explanatory, avoiding any evaluative stance on the tools
  4. Furious denunciation, accusing judges of intentionally using tools to oppress defendants
  5. Dismissive contrarianism, denying that disparities in sentencing exist

Explanation: This question tests the reader's ability to identify the author's tone toward algorithmic sentencing tools. Tone is conveyed through diction and emphasis, critiquing misleading objectivity while noting potential structure. The passage concedes models can 'reduce idiosyncratic disparities' but warns they embed 'prior inequities' and encode normative judgments. It further notes they can 'launder contested values' through technical means. Therefore, choice A reflects this cautiously critical warning about biases. Choice B is a celebratory distractor, portraying a straightforward fix, ignoring the author's emphasis on historical data issues. Choice E fails by dismissively denying disparities, contrary to the passage's recognition of them.

Question 8

Passage:

In the philosophy of science, some accounts portray scientific laws as mere summaries of observed regularities. On this view, laws do not govern nature; they simply describe patterns that happen to hold. The attraction of the view is its austerity: it avoids positing mysterious necessities beyond what observation reveals.

Others argue that this austerity comes at a cost. If laws are only summaries, it becomes difficult to explain why they support counterfactuals—why, for example, we think an object would fall even if it had not been dropped. Moreover, scientific practice often treats laws as tools for explanation and prediction, not just as bookkeeping devices.

A third approach attempts to bridge the gap by treating laws as features of models rather than as direct components of the world or mere lists of data. Laws, on this account, capture stable relationships within idealized representations that scientists use to navigate complex systems. This proposal aims to preserve the empiricist’s caution while accounting for the explanatory work laws appear to do.

Question: The second paragraph primarily functions to…

  1. offer a defense of the regularity view by showing that counterfactuals are irrelevant to science
  2. introduce difficulties for the regularity view, preparing the reader for an alternative offered later (correct answer)
  3. define counterfactual reasoning and provide a complete taxonomy of its forms
  4. present historical examples proving that scientists never use laws for explanation
  5. conclude the debate by demonstrating that the regularity view is logically contradictory

Explanation: This question tests the reader's understanding of passage structure and organization in GRE Verbal Reasoning. Structure concerns how ideas are arranged to support the author’s purpose, such as introducing views and their difficulties. The second paragraph highlights costs of the regularity view, like counterfactual support and explanatory roles. This prepares for the bridging approach in the third paragraph. Choice B accurately identifies this preparatory function. In contrast, choice A fails by suggesting defense of regularity, confusing critique with support. Similarly, choice C misaligns as defining counterfactuals taxonomically, focusing on content rather than organizational introduction of difficulties.

Question 9

Read the passage and answer the question.

Economists who study innovation often assume that patents stimulate research by granting temporary monopolies, thereby allowing inventors to recoup development costs. Yet in industries where products combine many components—such as smartphones—patents can also create “thickets” that make it expensive to negotiate rights, especially for smaller firms. One survey of start-ups reported that founders frequently delayed product launches to avoid litigation, even when their designs were independently developed.

Policy proposals to reduce thickets typically recommend narrowing patent scope or increasing the evidentiary burden for granting patents. Opponents respond that such reforms would weaken incentives for genuine breakthroughs and would mainly benefit large firms that can already imitate quickly. But this objection assumes that current patent breadth is the only way to reward invention, ignoring alternatives such as prizes, procurement contracts, or shorter exclusivity periods in fast-moving sectors.

The primary function of the highlighted sentence is to:

  1. describe the survey’s finding that start-ups delayed launches to avoid litigation
  2. concede that narrowing patent scope would eliminate incentives for all types of research
  3. challenge an opponent’s premise by pointing out that it overlooks other mechanisms for rewarding innovation (correct answer)
  4. introduce a new topic by explaining how smartphone components are manufactured
  5. offer a broad historical overview of patent law from the eighteenth century to the present

Explanation: This question tests understanding of sentence function in argumentative writing. Function analysis requires identifying what role the sentence plays in advancing or defending the author's position. The highlighted sentence directly challenges the opponents' reasoning by pointing out a flawed assumption—that current patent breadth is the only way to incentivize innovation. By listing alternative mechanisms (prizes, contracts, shorter periods), the sentence undermines the premise of the opponents' objection. The Correct answer (C) accurately captures this challenging function. Option B misrepresents the sentence as a concession when it actually attacks the opponents' logic, demonstrating how function questions test the ability to recognize argumentative moves rather than just content.

Question 10

A university library replaced most staffed service desks with self-checkout kiosks. In the semester after the change, the library recorded a 20% increase in the number of items checked out. The library director concludes that the kiosks caused the increase and therefore plans to remove the remaining staffed desks to further boost circulation. The director adds that students prefer faster transactions and that kiosks provide them. Which statement most seriously undermines the author’s conclusion?

  1. In the same semester, the library extended its operating hours by two hours per day on weekdays.
  2. Some students have complained that the kiosks occasionally fail to read older barcode labels.
  3. The library’s budget for purchasing new books was slightly lower than in the previous year.
  4. The library offers study rooms that can be reserved online without interacting with service-desk staff.
  5. During that semester, several large introductory courses assigned weekly readings available only as physical reserves in the library. (correct answer)

Explanation: This question asks you to weaken an argument about self-checkout kiosks causing increased library circulation. To weaken this causal claim, you need to find evidence that something else might explain the 20% increase in checkouts. The argument assumes that the kiosks themselves drove the increase, rather than external factors affecting demand for library materials. The correct answer (E) provides an alternative explanation: several large courses assigned weekly readings available only as physical reserves, which would naturally increase checkouts regardless of the checkout method. This undermines the director's conclusion that kiosks caused the increase and calls into question the plan to remove more staffed desks. Choice A about extended hours is tempting but doesn't directly explain increased checkouts, while choice B about occasional failures actually supports keeping some staffed desks rather than weakening the causal claim.

Question 11

Select the answer choice that best completes the sentence. Although the committee praised the proposal’s ambition, it rejected the timeline as  , noting that key permits typically take many months to secure.

  1. meticulous
  2. tentative
  3. impractical (correct answer)
  4. transparent
  5. ordinary

Explanation: This question tests vocabulary meaning in context, requiring you to identify a word that describes an unrealistic timeline. The context clues indicate that while the proposal's ambition was praised, the timeline was rejected because permits take many months to secure. The correct answer is (C) 'impractical,' which means not sensible or realistic given the circumstances. 'Impractical' fits perfectly because it captures the disconnect between the proposed timeline and the reality of permit processing times. In this context, 'impractical' means unrealistic or not feasible to implement. Choice (A) 'meticulous' fails because it means extremely careful and precise, which would be a positive quality for a timeline rather than a reason for rejection.

Question 12

A university committee surveyed 25 seniors who attended a new "capstone writing" workshop and found that 22 of them reported feeling more confident about writing. The committee concludes that the workshop is effective and therefore should be required for all students in every major. Which of the following criticisms best applies to the argument?​

  1. It overlooks the possibility that students in some majors have fewer writing assignments than others.
  2. It draws a broad conclusion about all students from a small, self-reported sample that may not be representative and does not measure actual improvement. (correct answer)
  3. It assumes without justification that seniors are less capable writers than first-year students.
  4. It proceeds by analogy, treating the workshop as equivalent to an advanced literature course.
  5. It establishes with certainty that requiring the workshop will increase the university's graduation rate.

Explanation: This question tests evaluating argument logic by examining how evidence supports a conclusion. Strong arguments use representative samples and measure actual outcomes rather than subjective impressions. The committee surveyed only 25 self-selected seniors about their confidence levels, then concluded the workshop should be mandatory for all students. This reasoning generalizes from a tiny, potentially biased sample (seniors who chose to attend) and measures only self-reported confidence, not actual writing improvement. Answer B correctly identifies both flaws: the unrepresentative sample and the reliance on subjective self-reports rather than objective measures. Answer A misses the point by focusing on writing assignments across majors, which doesn't address the fundamental sampling and measurement problems.

Question 13

A school district replaced its traditional math curriculum with a new program emphasizing conceptual understanding and group problem-solving. After one year, classroom observations showed more student participation and more time spent discussing reasoning. Yet standardized test scores in math declined slightly. The district also changed the test-preparation schedule, reducing the number of weeks devoted to practice tests, and many teachers reported needing time to learn the new curriculum. Which of the following, if true, best resolves the apparent discrepancy?

  1. Students sometimes enjoy group work more than independent work.
  2. The new curriculum may improve deeper understanding but, in the short term, reduced test practice and teacher unfamiliarity can lower standardized scores even as participation increases. (correct answer)
  3. Standardized math tests include multiple-choice questions as well as short-answer questions.
  4. Some parents prefer that schools emphasize memorization of formulas.
  5. The district also updated its science curriculum during the same year.

Explanation: This question tests the ability to resolve a paradox by identifying an explanation that reconciles two seemingly contradictory facts. Paradox questions require finding a choice that accounts for both the increased participation from the new curriculum and the slight decline in test scores. The correct answer explains that short-term factors like less test practice and teacher adjustment lowered scores despite deeper engagement. This accounts for the curriculum's benefits by allowing better understanding long-term, while transitional issues explain score drops. Thus, it resolves the paradox by highlighting temporary implementation effects. In contrast, choice A addresses enjoyment but fails to explain declining scores with more participation. Similarly, choice D notes preferences but does not reconcile engagement gains with test outcomes.

Question 14

A language-learning app added a gamified feature that awards points for daily practice. After the change, the number of daily active users increased substantially. Yet the company’s internal assessment found that the average improvement on a standardized proficiency test among users decreased slightly. The assessment also noted that many new daily users engaged primarily in short, repetitive exercises that yield points quickly, while fewer users completed longer writing and speaking modules. Which of the following helps explain the seeming contradiction?

  1. Some users prefer learning languages through in-person classes rather than through apps.
  2. The gamified feature attracted more frequent but more superficial practice, increasing daily activity while reducing time spent on higher-impact modules that drive test gains. (correct answer)
  3. Standardized proficiency tests can be stressful for some test-takers.
  4. The app expanded to new countries and added additional interface languages.
  5. The app’s point system was redesigned twice in the first month after launch.

Explanation: This question tests the ability to resolve a paradox by identifying an explanation that reconciles two seemingly contradictory facts. Paradox questions require finding a choice that accounts for both the increase in daily active users from gamification and the slight decrease in proficiency test improvements. The correct answer explains that gamification led to superficial practice, boosting activity but reducing engagement with impactful modules. This accounts for user growth by allowing appealing quick exercises, while module shifts explain lower gains. Thus, it resolves the paradox by showing quantity over quality in practice. In contrast, choice A addresses preferences but fails to explain declining improvements with more users. Similarly, choice C notes test stress but does not reconcile increased activity with worse outcomes.

Question 15

Select the answer choice that best completes the sentence. The lab’s new protocol reduced contamination, but it also made each run slower; thus, the overall throughput was   rather than improved.

  1. enhanced
  2. diminished
  3. maximized
  4. stabilized (correct answer)
  5. celebrated

Explanation: This question tests logical fit in Text Completion through a cause-and-effect relationship with mixed outcomes. The sentence presents two effects of the new protocol: reduced contamination (positive) but slower runs (negative), connected by 'but' and 'thus' to show the net impact on throughput. The correct answer 'stabilized' (B) indicates that throughput remained roughly the same rather than improved—the gains from reduced contamination were offset by slower processing. This satisfies the logic of balanced trade-offs resulting in no net change. 'Enhanced' (A) or 'maximized' (C) would incorrectly suggest improvement, contradicting the stated drawback of slower runs.

Question 16

Read the passage and answer the question.

Conservation plans sometimes prioritize protecting large, contiguous wilderness areas on the assumption that bigger reserves always preserve more biodiversity. The passage argues that while size can matter, focusing exclusively on area can overlook how landscapes actually function. In fragmented regions, small habitats may serve as stepping-stones that allow species to move between larger patches, maintaining genetic diversity and enabling migration in response to climate shifts. In such cases, connectivity can be as important as total protected acreage.

The passage also notes that some species thrive in edge environments or depend on specific microhabitats that do not require vast tracts of land. Conversely, certain large reserves may be poorly located relative to future environmental change, offering less long-term protection than their size suggests. The passage concludes that conservation should be planned as a network problem: decision-makers should evaluate how protected sites interact, which corridors exist or can be restored, and which ecological processes are being supported. The goal is not to reject large reserves but to avoid a simplistic “bigger is always better” rule.

Which of the following best describes the main idea of the passage?

  1. argue that conservation should consider connectivity and ecological function in addition to reserve size, rather than relying on a simple acreage rule (correct answer)
  2. provide a detailed method for calculating the minimum corridor width required for different species to migrate
  3. discuss conservation and mention that reserve size, stepping-stones, corridors, and microhabitats can matter
  4. argue that small habitats are always superior to large wilderness reserves for preserving biodiversity
  5. criticize conservation planners for deliberately ignoring climate change when they design large protected areas

Explanation: This question tests your ability to identify the main idea of a passage about conservation planning. A correct main idea answer should capture the central argument that the passage develops throughout, not just mention topics or provide incomplete coverage. The passage develops its central point by challenging the assumption that bigger reserves are always better for conservation, arguing instead that connectivity and ecological function matter as much as size. The author supports this by explaining how small habitats can serve as stepping-stones, how some species thrive in edge environments, and how conservation should be planned as a network problem. Answer A correctly captures this main idea by stating that conservation should consider connectivity and ecological function in addition to reserve size, rather than relying on a simple acreage rule. Answer C fails because it merely lists topics mentioned without capturing the passage's specific argument against the "bigger is always better" approach.

Question 17

A consumer advocacy group compared two sets of neighborhoods: those with curbside compost pickup and those without it. In neighborhoods that added compost pickup, landfill-bound household waste decreased by an average of 9% within a year, while recycling rates remained stable. The program’s operating cost was offset by reduced landfill fees, according to the city’s budget office. Since the city’s waste-reduction target focuses specifically on lowering landfill tonnage, the group argues that the city should expand curbside compost pickup to all neighborhoods.

Which of the following best states the conclusion of the argument?

  1. Recycling rates remained stable in neighborhoods that added compost pickup.
  2. The city’s waste-reduction target focuses on lowering landfill tonnage.
  3. Curbside compost pickup reduced landfill-bound household waste by an average of 9% within a year.
  4. The city should expand curbside compost pickup to all neighborhoods. (correct answer)
  5. Expanding compost pickup will increase recycling rates citywide.

Explanation: This question tests identifying an argument's conclusion. Conclusions express the main claim an author wants to establish, while premises provide supporting reasons. The passage presents evidence about compost pickup's effects: reduced landfill waste, stable recycling rates, and cost neutrality through offset fees. These facts, combined with the city's waste-reduction goals, all support the advocacy group's recommendation. The Dorrect answer (D) captures this conclusion: "The city should expand curbside compost pickup to all neighborhoods." Choice C about the 9% reduction in landfill waste is merely one of the supporting facts used to justify the expansion, not the conclusion itself.

Question 18

Read the passage and answer the question.

In many workplaces, “productivity” is treated as a single, easily measured quantity, often proxied by hours logged or tasks completed. Yet these metrics can obscure the distinction between activity and value. A team may increase output by producing more reports, emails, or meetings, while simultaneously reducing the time available for analysis and decision-making. Some managers respond by introducing tighter monitoring, assuming that visibility will deter wasted effort; however, heightened surveillance can prompt employees to optimize for what is measured rather than for what matters, such as long-term problem prevention or creative experimentation. A more informative approach separates productivity into at least two components: efficiency (how quickly resources are converted into deliverables) and effectiveness (whether the deliverables advance the organization’s goals). This distinction clarifies why certain interventions—like reducing unnecessary meetings, improving documentation, or empowering employees to decline low-impact requests—can raise effectiveness even if they lower visible activity. The point is not that measurement is futile, but that organizations should choose indicators that align with desired outcomes and remain alert to behavioral shifts caused by the indicators themselves.

Which of the following best describes the main idea of the passage?

  1. To argue that workplace surveillance is inherently counterproductive and should be eliminated in all organizations
  2. To explain why common productivity metrics can mislead and to propose a framework that distinguishes efficiency from effectiveness (correct answer)
  3. To describe various tools managers use to track employee activity, such as monitoring software and time sheets
  4. To recommend that organizations maximize the number of deliverables produced per week regardless of their strategic value
  5. To provide a comprehensive theory of organizational behavior that explains all employee motivation across industries

Explanation: This question tests the main idea of the passage by asking for the best description of its central focus. A correct main idea answer should capture the passage's overall argument without being too narrow or too broad, encompassing the key critique and proposed alternative. The passage develops this by critiquing simplistic productivity metrics like hours or tasks, which can obscure value, and by discussing how surveillance may exacerbate the issue. It then introduces a distinction between efficiency and effectiveness, using examples like reducing meetings to illustrate how this framework improves understanding. Choice B justifies this as the main idea because it accurately reflects the passage's emphasis on misleading metrics and the proposed separation of components to better align with organizational goals. In contrast, choice A is too extreme, as the passage does not argue for eliminating all surveillance but rather for more thoughtful measurement. Similarly, choice C is too narrow, focusing only on describing tools without addressing the broader critique and framework.

Question 19

Read the passage and answer the question.

A computer science instructor reported outcomes from a new grading policy in an introductory programming course. In 2022, the course had 180 students and used a traditional points-based system: three midterm exams (each worth 20% of the grade), weekly quizzes (20%), and a final project (20%). In 2023, with 192 students, the instructor replaced the points-based system with a “mastery” model in which students could retake quizzes up to two times, and the lowest midterm score was dropped. The report stated that the final project remained required in both years and that its rubric was unchanged. Average course grades (on a 4.0 scale) were reported as 2.74 in 2022 and 2.89 in 2023. The instructor also noted that the 2023 course used the same textbook edition as 2022.

According to the passage, which of the following is true?

  1. In 2023, students could retake quizzes up to two times. (correct answer)
  2. In 2022, the course dropped the lowest midterm score.
  3. The final project was optional in 2023 but required in 2022.
  4. The textbook edition changed between 2022 and 2023.
  5. Average course grades decreased from 2.89 in 2022 to 2.74 in 2023.

Explanation: This question tests detail comprehension by asking which statement is true according to the passage. Correct answers in such questions restate explicit information from the text without adding inferences or external knowledge. The relevant detail is in the third sentence, which describes the 2023 grading policy. This sentence states that in 2023, the mastery model allowed students to retake quizzes up to two times. Choice A matches this text by restating the retake policy for quizzes in 2023. A representative distractor, like choice E, fails because it reverses the grade trend; the passage reports an increase from 2.74 in 2022 to 2.89 in 2023. This distractor inverts the numbers.

Question 20

A city planner concludes that Riverton should convert one downtown traffic lane into a protected bike lane. Bicycle counts on the main corridor have doubled over five years, while car counts on the same corridor have remained essentially flat. After a nearby city installed protected lanes on a comparable street, retail vacancy rates on that street fell and pedestrian injuries declined, according to that city’s annual safety report. Since Riverton’s corridor has similar block length and storefront density, the planner argues that a protected lane would likely yield comparable safety and economic benefits. Which statement functions as a reason in the argument?

  1. Riverton should convert one downtown traffic lane into a protected bike lane.
  2. Bicycle counts on the main corridor have doubled over five years, while car counts on the same corridor have remained essentially flat. (correct answer)
  3. Riverton’s downtown includes several historic buildings and a riverfront park.
  4. Drivers in Riverton will support the conversion because it will reduce their commute times.
  5. Protected bike lanes always increase retail sales in every neighborhood regardless of other conditions.

Explanation: This question tests identifying premises or evidence that support an argument. Premises are the stated facts or observations used to justify the conclusion. The planner's conclusion is that "Riverton should convert one downtown traffic lane into a protected bike lane." The Borrect answer (B) provides specific traffic data: "Bicycle counts on the main corridor have doubled over five years, while car counts on the same corridor have remained essentially flat." This evidence demonstrates increasing demand for bicycle infrastructure without corresponding growth in car traffic, supporting the reallocation of road space from cars to bikes. The premise shows that usage patterns have shifted, making the proposed conversion logical. Choice A is incorrect because it simply states the conclusion—what the argument aims to prove—rather than offering evidence to support that conclusion.

Question 21

Read the passage and answer the question.

In linguistics, some researchers propose that children acquire grammar primarily by inferring abstract rules, while others argue that children rely more on memorized patterns that gradually generalize. Evidence for the pattern-based view comes from corpora showing that young children often reproduce multiword chunks—such as “I wanna”—before they can reliably manipulate the component words. Still, rule-based theorists note that children can produce novel sentences they have never heard, which seems to require some abstraction.

A recent longitudinal study attempted to reconcile these positions by tracking the same children’s speech over three years. Early on, the children’s utterances clustered around a small set of high-frequency frames; later, the frames diversified and errors appeared that suggested overgeneralization (for example, applying a regular past tense to an irregular verb). The authors argue that such errors are not embarrassments for pattern learning but signs that generalization is underway.

The author includes the final sentence in order to:

  1. provide a definition of “overgeneralization” that lists every known type of child language error
  2. report a new dataset showing that children never use memorized frames in early speech
  3. dismiss rule-based theorists by claiming that abstraction plays no role in language acquisition
  4. reinterpret a potentially troubling observation (errors) as evidence supporting the authors’ reconciliatory account (correct answer)
  5. shift the discussion from child language to adult second-language instruction methods

Explanation: This question asks about the function of a concluding sentence in presenting research findings. Function refers to what argumentative work the sentence performs in the passage's reasoning about language acquisition. The final sentence reframes what might seem like problematic evidence (errors) as actually supporting the pattern-learning account by showing that generalization is occurring. This reinterpretation helps reconcile the two theoretical positions by showing how pattern learning can lead to rule-like behavior. The Dorrect answer (D) accurately identifies this reinterpretive function that supports the reconciliatory account. Option A incorrectly focuses on defining terminology rather than recognizing the sentence's role in reframing evidence to support the theoretical synthesis.

Question 22

An economist examined the effects of a new commuter rail line on small businesses near stations. Using tax records, she found that in the first year after the line opened, retail sales increased most in neighborhoods that also relaxed zoning rules for mixed-use development. In neighborhoods where zoning remained restrictive, sales increases were smaller and were concentrated in businesses that already had high foot traffic before the rail line. The economist also noted that commercial rents rose in all station areas, but the steepest rent increases occurred in the mixed-use neighborhoods. Interviews with business owners suggested that some long-standing low-margin shops closed after rents increased, while newly opened businesses tended to be higher-margin services. The economist cautioned that raw sales growth alone could obscure changes in the composition of businesses.

Which statement is most strongly supported by the information given?​

  1. Relaxing zoning rules guarantees that all existing small businesses near stations will thrive after rail expansion.
  2. In mixed-use station areas, some of the observed sales growth may reflect a shift toward higher-margin businesses rather than uniform gains among incumbents. (correct answer)
  3. Commercial rents did not rise in any station area where zoning remained restrictive.
  4. Retail sales increased most in neighborhoods where zoning remained restrictive.
  5. The commuter rail line had no effect on business outcomes because rents rose everywhere.

Explanation: This question tests the ability to make a valid inference from the passage. A correct inference must be logically supported by the information provided without being directly stated. The passage reports that retail sales increased most in mixed-use neighborhoods with relaxed zoning, but also notes steep rent increases there, closures of low-margin shops, and openings of higher-margin businesses. The economist cautions that raw sales growth could obscure changes in business composition, suggesting that some growth reflects shifts rather than uniform gains. Therefore, in mixed-use station areas, some observed sales growth may reflect a shift toward higher-margin businesses rather than uniform gains among incumbents, as supported by the interviews and the caution about raw data. A tempting incorrect choice, such as option A, claims that relaxing zoning guarantees all small businesses will thrive, but this is too absolute and ignores evidence of closures due to rents. Another option like E overstates that the rail line had no effect because rents rose everywhere, which contradicts the reported sales increases.

Question 23

An airline introduced a new boarding procedure intended to reduce turnaround time between flights. After implementation, average turnaround time decreased by four minutes. Yet the airline’s on-time departure rate did not improve. During the same period, the airline changed its scheduling policy to reduce “buffer time” between flights, and it also began operating more flights out of a congested hub airport where gate availability is limited. Which of the following best accounts for the situation described?

  1. Some passengers board more quickly when they travel without carry-on luggage.
  2. Reducing buffer time and increasing operations at a congested hub can negate improvements in turnaround by leaving less slack to absorb delays unrelated to boarding. (correct answer)
  3. The new boarding procedure was unpopular with some frequent flyers.
  4. On-time departure rates can be influenced by weather conditions.
  5. The airline’s planes are serviced by the same ground crew contractors as before.

Explanation: This question tests the ability to resolve a paradox by identifying an explanation that reconciles two seemingly contradictory facts. Paradox questions require finding a choice that accounts for both the reduced turnaround time from the new procedure and the unchanged on-time departure rate. The correct answer explains that less buffer time and congested hub operations absorbed the time savings without improving departures. This accounts for the procedure's efficiency by allowing faster turnarounds, while scheduling changes explain no net gain. Thus, it resolves the paradox by showing offsets from other policies. In contrast, choice A addresses boarding speed but fails to explain stable departure rates. Similarly, choice D notes weather but does not reconcile the turnaround improvement with unchanged on-time performance.

Question 24

Read the passage and answer the question.

A museum evaluated two label formats for a new exhibit: traditional paragraph labels and a question-based format that posed a short question followed by a brief answer. Visitors were randomly assigned entry times that corresponded to one of the two label formats, and their dwell time at each display case was recorded. The museum also administered a short quiz at the exit that tested recall of three factual details from the exhibit. Average dwell time was higher in the question-based condition, but quiz scores were statistically indistinguishable between the two conditions. In follow-up interviews, visitors in the question-based condition more often reported that the exhibit “felt easier to navigate,” while visitors in the paragraph-label condition more often reported that they “learned a lot.” The researchers cautioned that self-reports can reflect expectations about what “learning” should feel like and may not track objective recall.

It can be reasonably concluded that:

  1. Question-based labels increased how long visitors spent at displays without measurably improving recall of the specific facts tested. (correct answer)
  2. Visitors who read paragraph labels had lower dwell time than those who read question-based labels.
  3. Question-based labels prevent visitors from learning because they oversimplify complex material.
  4. Paragraph labels led to better factual recall than question-based labels.
  5. If the quiz had tested conceptual understanding rather than facts, paragraph labels would certainly have outperformed question-based labels.

Explanation: This question requires inferring a reasonable conclusion from the museum study data. An inference should be logically supported without being directly stated in the passage. The passage explicitly states that average dwell time was higher in the question-based condition, but quiz scores were statistically indistinguishable between conditions. This directly supports the inference that question-based labels increased viewing time without improving factual recall. Option A accurately captures this relationship between the two measured outcomes. Option C is too strong ("prevent learning"), while option E speculates about untested conditions (conceptual understanding was never measured).

Question 25

A museum introduced timed-entry tickets to reduce crowding and improve visitor experience. Post-implementation surveys showed that visitors rated the galleries as less crowded than before. Yet average time spent in the museum decreased by nearly 20%. During the same period, the museum opened a popular temporary exhibit in a separate building and required visitors to reserve a specific time slot for that exhibit as well. Which of the following, if true, best resolves the apparent discrepancy?

  1. Some visitors prefer museums that allow them to enter at any time without advance planning.
  2. The museum shop expanded its selection of souvenirs during the period in question.
  3. Coordinating multiple timed reservations encouraged visitors to follow a tighter schedule and leave sooner, even though the galleries felt less crowded. (correct answer)
  4. Visitors who spend less time in a museum tend to view fewer artworks.
  5. The temporary exhibit was reviewed favorably by local newspapers.

Explanation: This question tests the ability to resolve a paradox by identifying an explanation that reconciles two seemingly contradictory facts. Paradox questions require finding a choice that accounts for both the reduced crowding perception from timed tickets and the decrease in average visit time. The correct answer explains that multiple reservations encouraged tighter schedules and earlier departures, shortening visits despite less crowding. This accounts for the ticketing benefits by allowing improved gallery experience, while exhibit requirements explain shorter stays. Thus, it resolves the paradox by showing time reduction from scheduling constraints. In contrast, choice A addresses entry preferences but fails to explain shorter times with better experiences. Similarly, choice D notes viewing habits but does not reconcile less crowding with reduced time.