What this quiz covers
This quiz focuses on Interpret Standard Deviation, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for GMAT.
Dataset P has 20 values with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 8. Dataset Q has 30 values with a mean of 60 and standard deviation of 6. If one outlier with value 120 is added to Dataset P, and the new standard deviation becomes approximately 12, what can be concluded about the relative variability of the modified Dataset P compared to Dataset Q?
GMAT Quiz
Practice Interpret Standard Deviation in GMAT with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.
This quiz focuses on Interpret Standard Deviation, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for GMAT.
Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.
Dataset P has 20 values with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 8. Dataset Q has 30 values with a mean of 60 and standard deviation of 6. If one outlier with value 120 is added to Dataset P, and the new standard deviation becomes approximately 12, what can be concluded about the relative variability of the modified Dataset P compared to Dataset Q?
Explanation: To compare relative variability, we use the coefficient of variation (CV = standard deviation/mean). For Dataset Q: CV = 6/60 = 0.10. For modified Dataset P, the new mean = (20×50 + 120)/21 = 1120/21 ≈ 53.3. The CV = 12/53.3 ≈ 0.23. Therefore, modified Dataset P has higher relative variability. Choice B uses incorrect CV calculations. Choice C incorrectly suggests they're similar. Choice D is wrong because we can calculate the new mean from the given information.
A manufacturing process produces bolts with lengths that have a standard deviation of 0.8 mm. To improve precision, engineers implement a new process. After the change, they measure 100 bolts and find that 68% fall within 0.6 mm of the mean length. Assuming the lengths are approximately normally distributed, what conclusion can be drawn about the new process?
Explanation: In a normal distribution, approximately 68% of values fall within one standard deviation of the mean. Since 68% of bolts fall within 0.6 mm of the mean, the new standard deviation is approximately 0.6 mm. The improvement is (0.8 - 0.6)/0.8 = 0.2/0.8 = 25%. Choice B uses the correct standard deviation but incorrectly calculates improvement as (0.8 - 0.6)/0.6 ≈ 33%. Choice C misinterprets the ±0.6 mm range as being two standard deviations. Choice D is incorrect because the 68% rule directly gives us the standard deviation regardless of sample size.
A researcher studying test scores finds that Class A has a standard deviation of 12 points and Class B has a standard deviation of 8 points. Both classes have the same mean score. The researcher then removes the top 10% and bottom 10% of scores from each class. Which statement about the new standard deviations is most likely true?
Explanation: Removing extreme values (outliers) reduces standard deviation, but the effect is more pronounced for datasets that initially had higher variability. Class A, starting with higher standard deviation (12 vs 8), likely had more extreme values contributing to that variability. Removing the same percentage of extreme values will cause a larger proportional decrease in Class A's standard deviation. Choice A assumes a fixed proportional decrease (20%) which isn't necessarily accurate. Choice B is incorrect because trimming doesn't equalize standard deviations. Choice D incorrectly assumes the ratio remains constant after trimming.
A survey of household incomes in City A reveals a standard deviation of $18,000, while the same survey in City B shows a standard deviation of $24,000. Both cities have the same median household income of $55,000. An economist concludes that City B has greater income inequality. Which statement best evaluates this conclusion?
Explanation: Standard deviation measures variability but can be heavily influenced by outliers. Income distributions are typically right-skewed with high earners creating large standard deviations without necessarily indicating greater inequality among typical households. Since both cities have the same median, City B's higher standard deviation might reflect a few very high earners rather than broader inequality. Choice A oversimplifies the relationship between standard deviation and inequality. Choice C is partially relevant but doesn't address the main issue of outlier sensitivity. Choice D incorrectly suggests the conclusion is conditionally correct when the fundamental issue is outlier sensitivity.
A quality inspector measures the diameter of ball bearings from Machine 1 and finds a standard deviation of 0.05 mm. When Machine 2 is introduced, producing bearings with a standard deviation of 0.03 mm, the supervisor concludes that Machine 2 is superior. However, Machine 1 produces bearings with diameters averaging 10.00 mm (target), while Machine 2 produces bearings averaging 9.97 mm. How should the relative quality of these machines be evaluated?
Explanation: When you encounter questions about manufacturing quality control, you need to distinguish between accuracy (how close measurements are to the target) and precision (how consistent measurements are). These are independent concepts that both matter in manufacturing. Machine 1 hits the target diameter of 10.00 mm perfectly but has higher variability (0.05 mm standard deviation). Machine 2 is more consistent (0.03 mm standard deviation) but systematically misses the target by 0.03 mm. Neither machine is objectively "better" without knowing the specific requirements. The correct answer is D because the relative importance of accuracy versus precision depends entirely on the application's tolerance specifications. Some manufacturing processes can tolerate systematic bias but require tight consistency, while others need perfect centering but can handle more variation. Without knowing these specifications, you cannot definitively rank the machines. A is wrong because it assumes precision automatically trumps accuracy and that bias correction is always feasible or cost-effective. B makes the opposite error, assuming accuracy is inherently more important than precision. C incorrectly suggests these qualities can simply "compensate" for each other when they serve different manufacturing needs. The key trap here is thinking one aspect of quality (accuracy or precision) is universally more important than the other. On quantitative reasoning questions involving manufacturing or quality control, look for answer choices that acknowledge context-dependent trade-offs rather than making absolute judgments about which metric matters most.
A pharmaceutical company tests a drug's effectiveness by measuring improvement scores. The control group (n=50) has a mean improvement of 20 points with a standard deviation of 8 points. The treatment group (n=50) has a mean improvement of 28 points with a standard deviation of 12 points. A researcher claims that the treatment is more effective but also more variable in its effects. Which aspect of this claim requires the most careful evaluation?
Explanation: The effectiveness claim (higher mean) is straightforward to evaluate statistically. However, interpreting higher variability requires careful consideration: it could indicate inconsistent treatment effects (negative interpretation) or that the treatment helps some patients much more than others (potentially positive interpretation). The increase from 8 to 12 in standard deviation could reflect a beneficial increase in the upper tail of responses. Choice A focuses on statistical significance but misses the interpretive complexity of variability. Choice C incorrectly suggests the differences aren't meaningful. Choice D dismisses the need for careful evaluation.
A quality control manager measures the weights of products from two assembly lines. Line X produces items with weights that have a standard deviation of 2.4 grams, while Line Y produces items with weights that have a standard deviation of 1.8 grams. If the manager combines equal numbers of items from both lines into a single dataset, which statement best describes the standard deviation of the combined dataset?
Explanation: The standard deviation of combined datasets depends on the correlation between them and the difference in their means. The minimum possible value occurs when the datasets are perfectly negatively correlated and have the same mean (|2.4 - 1.8| = 0.6). The maximum occurs when they are perfectly positively correlated or have very different means (up to 2.4 + 1.8 = 4.2). Choice A incorrectly assumes you can average standard deviations. Choice B miscalculates the combined variance formula. Choice D incorrectly applies the formula √(σ₁² + σ₂²) which only works for independent variables with the same mean.
Two investment portfolios have the same expected annual return of 8%. Portfolio X has a standard deviation of 12%, while Portfolio Y has a standard deviation of 18%. An investor creates a new portfolio by investing equal amounts in both Portfolio X and Portfolio Y. Which statement about the risk (standard deviation) of the combined portfolio is correct?
Explanation: For a portfolio with equal weights (0.5 each), the standard deviation formula is σₚ = √[w₁²σ₁² + w₂²σ₂² + 2w₁w₂σ₁σ₂ρ]. With perfect negative correlation (ρ = -1): σₚ = |0.5×12% - 0.5×18%| = 3%. With perfect positive correlation (ρ = +1): σₚ = 0.5×12% + 0.5×18% = 15%. The actual value depends on correlation. Choice A incorrectly averages standard deviations. Choice B assumes zero correlation: √[0.25×144 + 0.25×324] = 15.3%. Choice D incorrectly uses √[12² + 18²] = 21.6%.
Company A and Company B both have 100 employees with mean salaries of $75,000. Company A has a standard deviation of $15,000, while Company B has a standard deviation of $5,000. If both companies decide to give every employee a $10,000 raise and then a 10% bonus on their new salary, which statement about the resulting standard deviations is correct?
Explanation: When a constant is added to all values in a dataset, the standard deviation remains unchanged. When all values are multiplied by a constant, the standard deviation is multiplied by that same constant. Here: (1) Add $10,000 - no change to standard deviation, (2) Multiply by 1.10 - standard deviation multiplies by 1.10. Company A: $15,000 × 1.10 = $16,500. Company B: $5,000 × 1.10 = $5,500. Choice A incorrectly adds the $10,000 to the standard deviation and then multiplies. Choice B incorrectly adds $10,000 then multiplies by 1.10. Choice D ignores that different initial standard deviations remain proportionally different.
A teacher gives the same test to two classes. Class 1 (25 students) has scores with a mean of 78 and standard deviation of 9. Class 2 (35 students) has scores with a mean of 82 and standard deviation of 6. The teacher wants to combine both classes' scores to calculate a single standard deviation for reporting purposes. Before doing any calculations, what can be predicted about the combined standard deviation?
Explanation: When combining data from multiple groups, you need to consider not just the variability within each group, but also how the groups differ from each other. This question tests whether you understand that pooled standard deviation can exceed the individual group standard deviations when group means are sufficiently different. The key insight is that when you combine classes with different means (78 vs. 82), you're introducing additional variability beyond what exists within each class. The combined dataset will include scores clustered around 78 AND scores clustered around 82, creating a more spread-out distribution than either class alone. This extra variability from the mean differences can push the pooled standard deviation above the higher individual standard deviation of 9. Choice A incorrectly assumes the pooled standard deviation must fall between the individual values, ignoring the impact of different group means. Choice B makes the same fundamental error, suggesting the result depends only on score distributions rather than recognizing that different means automatically create additional spread. Choice C represents a common misconception—you cannot calculate pooled standard deviation by simply taking a weighted average of individual standard deviations. This approach completely ignores the between-group variability. Choice D correctly recognizes that the 4-point difference in means (78 vs. 82) will likely contribute enough additional variability to push the combined standard deviation above 9, despite Class 2's lower individual variability. Study tip: Remember that pooled standard deviation isn't bounded by the individual group standard deviations when group means differ significantly. Always consider both within-group and between-group sources of variability.
Look at the bar chart. Which classroom's quiz scores exhibit a smaller standard deviation, and why?
Explanation: Classroom 1's bars show a pronounced peak at the center (scores 6-7) with few extreme values, indicating low variability. Classroom 2 shows a flatter distribution spread across scores 2-10, including many low and high scores, indicating higher variability. Therefore Classroom 1 has the smaller standard deviation. B – More extreme scores increase, not decrease, standard deviation. C – Equal sample sizes do not determine equal standard deviations. D – Distribution shape in bar charts does indicate relative variability.
Based on the histograms shown, which warehouse's shipment weights exhibit the larger standard deviation?
Explanation: Warehouse X's histogram covers a spread from roughly 10 kg to 50 kg, while Warehouse Y's data are tightly clustered between about 20 kg and 30 kg. The broader range and more even spread of X imply a larger standard deviation. B – A central peak alone does not imply greater variability. C – The differing spreads contradict identical standard deviations. D – Visual evidence about dispersion is usually sufficient to compare variability qualitatively.
Refer to the time-series plots. Over the 12 months shown, which company experienced the smaller standard deviation in monthly revenue?
Explanation: Visually, Company A's revenue line is nearly flat, staying within about $3 million of its mean, whereas Company B swings almost $10 million above and below its average. Less fluctuation translates to a smaller standard deviation for Company A. B – Total revenue does not determine variability. C – Having the same number of observations says nothing about their spread. D – Even without the exact mean, relative variability is evident from the plot.
Refer to the box-and-whisker plots below. If both data sets have the same mean, which additional statement must also be true?
Explanation: With identical means, variability decides the standard deviation. Data Set R's box spans a wider interval and its whiskers extend farther, indicating more dispersed data and therefore a larger standard deviation. B – A higher median does not guarantee greater spread. C – Equal means do not entail equal variability. D – The visual evidence of spread is sufficient for comparison.
Based on the pie charts shown, which department's monthly expenses are likely to have the smaller standard deviation over the year?
Explanation: Department M's pie shows 12 wedges of nearly equal size (around 8–10 percent each), implying monthly expenses are consistent. Department N has one dominant slice and several very small ones, signaling larger month-to-month fluctuations; hence its standard deviation is higher and Department M's is lower. B – A large single slice indicates greater, not smaller, variation. C – Percent totals do not dictate variability. D – The distribution of slice sizes reveals consistency.