GMAT Data Insights Quiz: Apply Two Part Elimination
7 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Apply Two Part EliminationQuestion 1 of 7

A university's admissions committee is reviewing applications for a competitive graduate program. Each application is evaluated on two primary criteria: Academic Merit (AM) and Research Potential (RP). The committee has established the following decision framework: applications scoring in the top 25% for Academic Merit automatically advance to the final round, regardless of Research Potential score. Applications scoring in the bottom 25% for Academic Merit are automatically rejected, regardless of Research Potential score. For applications in the middle 50% for Academic Merit, advancement depends entirely on Research Potential score.

The admissions committee is now reviewing two specific applications: Application Alpha and Application Beta. Based on the committee's framework, evaluate the following determinations:

Determination 1: If Alpha scores in the 60th percentile for Academic Merit, then Alpha's advancement depends solely on Research Potential score. Determination 2: If Beta scores in the 20th percentile for Academic Merit, then Beta will be rejected regardless of Research Potential score.

For each determination, select Correct or Incorrect based on the established framework.

Determination 1: Correct; Determination 2: Correct
Determination 1: Correct; Determination 2: Incorrect
Determination 1: Incorrect; Determination 2: Correct
Determination 1: Incorrect; Determination 2: Incorrect
← Back to quizzes

GMAT Data Insights Quiz

GMAT Data Insights Quiz: Apply Two Part Elimination

Practice Apply Two Part Elimination in GMAT Data Insights with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Apply Two Part Elimination, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for GMAT Data Insights.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A university's admissions committee is reviewing applications for a competitive graduate program. Each application is evaluated on two primary criteria: Academic Merit (AM) and Research Potential (RP). The committee has established the following decision framework: applications scoring in the top 25% for Academic Merit automatically advance to the final round, regardless of Research Potential score. Applications scoring in the bottom 25% for Academic Merit are automatically rejected, regardless of Research Potential score. For applications in the middle 50% for Academic Merit, advancement depends entirely on Research Potential score.

The admissions committee is now reviewing two specific applications: Application Alpha and Application Beta. Based on the committee's framework, evaluate the following determinations:

Determination 1: If Alpha scores in the 60th percentile for Academic Merit, then Alpha's advancement depends solely on Research Potential score. Determination 2: If Beta scores in the 20th percentile for Academic Merit, then Beta will be rejected regardless of Research Potential score.

For each determination, select Correct or Incorrect based on the established framework.

  1. Determination 1: Correct; Determination 2: Correct (correct answer)
  2. Determination 1: Correct; Determination 2: Incorrect
  3. Determination 1: Incorrect; Determination 2: Correct
  4. Determination 1: Incorrect; Determination 2: Incorrect

Explanation: Both determinations are correct. Determination 1: The 60th percentile falls in the middle 50% range (25th-75th percentiles), so according to the framework, advancement depends entirely on Research Potential score. Determination 2: The 20th percentile falls in the bottom 25%, so the application is automatically rejected regardless of Research Potential score. Both conclusions follow directly from the established decision framework.

Question 2

A clinical research institute is conducting a multi-phase study on the effectiveness of two treatment protocols: Protocol X and Protocol Y. The study design requires careful consideration of patient allocation and outcome measurement. The research team must ensure that their conclusions about treatment effectiveness are statistically valid and clinically meaningful.

The research team needs to evaluate two key research propositions for their study design:

Proposition 1: If Protocol X shows statistically significant improvement over baseline in Phase II trials, then Protocol X should advance to Phase III trials regardless of Protocol Y's performance. Proposition 2: If both protocols show similar efficacy rates in Phase II trials, then the protocol with fewer adverse events should be selected for Phase III trials.

Evaluate the logical validity of each proposition based on standard clinical research principles:

Proposition 1 validity: Logically sound / Logically flawed / Cannot be determined without additional criteria Proposition 2 validity: Logically sound / Logically flawed / Cannot be determined without additional criteria

  1. Proposition 1: Logically sound; Proposition 2: Logically sound
  2. Proposition 1: Logically flawed; Proposition 2: Logically sound
  3. Proposition 1: Cannot be determined without additional criteria; Proposition 2: Logically sound
  4. Proposition 1: Cannot be determined without additional criteria; Proposition 2: Cannot be determined without additional criteria (correct answer)

Explanation: Both propositions cannot be determined without additional criteria. Proposition 1 is incomplete because advancing to Phase III requires more than just statistical significance over baseline - it typically requires comparison with standard care, safety profiles, effect size considerations, and resource allocation decisions. The phrase 'regardless of Protocol Y's performance' is problematic if both are competing for the same resources or patient population. Proposition 2 assumes that 'fewer adverse events' is always the deciding factor when efficacy is similar, but this ignores other critical factors such as cost, administration complexity, patient compliance, long-term effects, and the severity/reversibility of adverse events. Both propositions need additional decision criteria to be logically complete.

Question 3

A pharmaceutical company is testing two new drug formulations, X and Y, for treating a specific condition. The company needs to evaluate two criteria: Efficacy (measured by symptom reduction percentage) and Safety (measured by adverse event frequency). Based on preliminary trial data, the following constraints have been established:

  • If Drug X has efficacy ≥ 75%, then Drug Y must have safety rating ≥ 8.5
  • If Drug Y has safety rating < 8.5, then Drug X cannot have efficacy ≥ 75%
  • At least one drug must meet the minimum threshold for market approval

Given that Drug Y's safety rating is 8.2, determine the status of each drug.

Drug X efficacy status: Must be above 75% / Must be below 75% / Could be either above or below 75% Drug Y approval status: Definitely approved / Definitely rejected / Status depends on other factors

  1. Drug X: Must be below 75%; Drug Y: Definitely rejected
  2. Drug X: Must be below 75%; Drug Y: Status depends on other factors (correct answer)
  3. Drug X: Could be either above or below 75%; Drug Y: Definitely rejected
  4. Drug X: Could be either above or below 75%; Drug Y: Status depends on other factors

Explanation: Given Drug Y's safety rating is 8.2 (which is < 8.5), the contrapositive of the first constraint applies: Drug X cannot have efficacy ≥ 75%, so Drug X must be below 75%. For Drug Y's approval status, we only know its safety rating (8.2), but approval depends on multiple factors including efficacy data that isn't provided. The minimum threshold for approval isn't specified, so we cannot definitively determine Drug Y's approval status based solely on the safety rating.

Question 4

A supply chain management system coordinates inventory between two distribution centers: Center P and Center Q. The system operates under the following automated rules:

  • If Center P inventory falls below 200 units, then Center Q must transfer 50 units to Center P within 24 hours
  • If Center Q inventory falls below 150 units, then Center Q cannot transfer any units to Center P
  • If Center Q transfers units to Center P, then Center P must process all incoming transfers before accepting new customer orders
  • Emergency orders override all transfer restrictions but require both centers to operate at reduced efficiency for 48 hours

Currently, Center P has 180 units and Center Q has 140 units. An emergency order for 75 units has just been received.

Determine the operational requirements:

Center Q transfer obligation: Must transfer 50 units / Cannot transfer any units / Transfer obligation is suspended Center P order processing: Must process transfers first / Must process emergency order first / Must process both simultaneously

  1. Center Q: Cannot transfer any units; Center P: Must process emergency order first
  2. Center Q: Transfer obligation is suspended; Center P: Must process emergency order first (correct answer)
  3. Center Q: Must transfer 50 units; Center P: Must process transfers first
  4. Center Q: Transfer obligation is suspended; Center P: Must process both simultaneously

Explanation: Center P's inventory (180 units) is below 200, which normally would trigger Center Q's transfer obligation. However, Center Q's inventory (140 units) is below 150, which prevents it from transferring units. The emergency order overrides all transfer restrictions, which suspends the normal transfer obligation rather than enabling it despite the inventory constraint. Emergency orders take priority and override normal operational rules. Therefore, Center Q's transfer obligation is suspended due to the emergency order override, and Center P must process the emergency order first since emergency orders have priority over regular transfer processing rules.

Question 5

A manufacturing company operates three production lines: Line A, Line B, and Line C. Due to equipment maintenance schedules and resource constraints, the following operational dependencies exist:

  • Line A can operate at maximum efficiency only when Line B operates at reduced efficiency (≤60%) OR when Line C is completely offline
  • Line B can operate at maximum efficiency only when both Line A and Line C operate at reduced efficiency (≤60%)
  • Line C can operate at maximum efficiency only when Line A operates at reduced efficiency (≤60%) AND Line B is completely offline
  • At least one line must operate at maximum efficiency to meet production targets

Given these constraints, determine the feasible operational states:

Line A operational status: Can operate at maximum efficiency / Must operate at reduced efficiency / Cannot operate Line B operational status: Can operate at maximum efficiency / Must operate at reduced efficiency / Cannot operate

  1. Line A: Can operate at maximum efficiency; Line B: Can operate at maximum efficiency
  2. Line A: Can operate at maximum efficiency; Line B: Must operate at reduced efficiency
  3. Line A: Must operate at reduced efficiency; Line B: Can operate at maximum efficiency (correct answer)
  4. Line A: Must operate at reduced efficiency; Line B: Must operate at reduced efficiency

Explanation: Let's analyze each line's maximum efficiency conditions: Line A requires (Line B ≤60% OR Line C offline). Line B requires (Line A ≤60% AND Line C ≤60%). Line C requires (Line A ≤60% AND Line B offline). These conditions reveal that Line A and Line B cannot both operate at maximum efficiency simultaneously, since Line B requires Line A ≤60% while Line A would be at maximum. However, Line B can operate at maximum efficiency when both Line A and Line C are at reduced efficiency (≤60%). Line A cannot operate at maximum efficiency in this scenario since Line B's maximum efficiency requirement conflicts with Line A's maximum efficiency. Therefore, Line A must operate at reduced efficiency, and Line B can operate at maximum efficiency.

Question 6

A financial institution is implementing a new credit approval system with two-stage verification. The system evaluates loan applications using Credit Score (CS) and Debt-to-Income ratio (DTI). The approval logic follows these rules:

  • Stage 1: Applications with CS ≥ 750 proceed to Stage 2, regardless of DTI
  • Stage 1: Applications with CS < 650 are rejected, regardless of DTI
  • Stage 1: Applications with 650 ≤ CS < 750 proceed to Stage 2 only if DTI ≤ 0.35
  • Stage 2: Final approval requires manual review considering additional factors

Two applications are being processed:

  • Application M: CS = 720, DTI = 0.40
  • Application N: CS = 680, DTI = 0.30

Determine the processing outcome for each:

Application M: Proceeds to Stage 2 / Rejected at Stage 1 / Requires additional information Application N: Proceeds to Stage 2 / Rejected at Stage 1 / Requires additional information

  1. Application M: Rejected at Stage 1; Application N: Proceeds to Stage 2 (correct answer)
  2. Application M: Proceeds to Stage 2; Application N: Rejected at Stage 1
  3. Application M: Rejected at Stage 1; Application N: Rejected at Stage 1
  4. Application M: Proceeds to Stage 2; Application N: Proceeds to Stage 2

Explanation: Application M has CS = 720, which falls in the 650 ≤ CS < 750 range, so it requires DTI ≤ 0.35 to proceed. Since DTI = 0.40 > 0.35, Application M is rejected at Stage 1. Application N has CS = 680, also in the 650 ≤ CS < 750 range, and DTI = 0.30 ≤ 0.35, so it meets the criteria to proceed to Stage 2. The key insight is that mid-range credit scores have stricter DTI requirements, while high scores (≥750) bypass DTI requirements entirely.

Question 7

A logistics company operates delivery routes in three regions: North, South, and East. The company's operational constraints require that:

  • If the North region operates at full capacity, then either the South region must reduce capacity by 15% OR the East region must reduce capacity by 20%
  • The South region can only reduce capacity if the East region maintains at least 85% capacity
  • The East region cannot simultaneously reduce capacity while the South region reduces capacity

Given that the North region will operate at full capacity next month, analyze the capacity scenarios:

South region capacity: Must be reduced by 15% / Must remain at current level / Could be either reduced or maintained East region capacity: Must be reduced by 20% / Must remain at at least 85% / Could be either reduced or maintained at high level

  1. South: Must remain at current level; East: Must be reduced by 20% (correct answer)
  2. South: Could be either reduced or maintained; East: Must remain at at least 85%
  3. South: Must be reduced by 15%; East: Must remain at at least 85%
  4. South: Could be either reduced or maintained; East: Could be either reduced or maintained at high level

Explanation: Given North operates at full capacity, either South must reduce by 15% OR East must reduce by 20%. If South reduces capacity, then by constraint 3, East cannot reduce capacity, so East must maintain high capacity (at least 85% per constraint 2). If East reduces by 20% (to 80%), then by constraint 3, South cannot reduce capacity. Since exactly one reduction must occur and both are mutually exclusive, we have two possible scenarios. However, if East reduces to 80%, this violates the requirement that East maintain at least 85% when South might reduce. Therefore, only one scenario is viable: South must remain at current level and East must reduce by 20%.