French 2 Quiz: Presenting Plans
9 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Presenting PlansQuestion 1 of 9

Marie écrit un e-mail à son professeur pour présenter son projet de présentation orale :

« Monsieur, pour ma présentation de vendredi, je   (parler) de mes vacances en Bretagne. Mon exposé   (commencer) à 9h15 dans la salle B204. Je   (apporter) des photos et une carte de la région. »

Quelles sont les trois formes correctes du futur proche pour compléter le message de Marie, dans l'ordre où elles apparaissent dans le texte ?

vais parler / va commencer / va apporter
vais parler / vais commencer / vais apporter
vais parler / va commencer / vais apporter
va parler / va commencer / vais apporter
← Back to quizzes

French 2 Quiz

French 2 Quiz: Presenting Plans

Practice Presenting Plans in French 2 with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Presenting Plans, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for French 2.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Marie écrit un e-mail à son professeur pour présenter son projet de présentation orale :

« Monsieur, pour ma présentation de vendredi, je   (parler) de mes vacances en Bretagne. Mon exposé   (commencer) à 9h15 dans la salle B204. Je   (apporter) des photos et une carte de la région. »

Quelles sont les trois formes correctes du futur proche pour compléter le message de Marie, dans l'ordre où elles apparaissent dans le texte ?

  1. vais parler / va commencer / va apporter
  2. vais parler / vais commencer / vais apporter
  3. vais parler / va commencer / vais apporter (correct answer)
  4. va parler / va commencer / vais apporter
Explanation: When using le futur proche (near future tense) in French, the formula is always: subject + conjugated form of aller + infinitive. The key word here is conjugated — the verb aller must agree with the subject of each clause, not the subject of the overall paragraph. In Marie's email, each sentence has a different subject. The first sentence uses "je" (I), so aller becomes vais → je vais parler. The second sentence switches to "Mon exposé" (a third-person singular subject, like "il/elle"), so aller becomes va → mon exposé va commencer. The third sentence returns to "je," so aller is vais again → je vais apporter. This gives you the sequence vais parler / va commencer / vais apporter, which is answer C. Choice A (vais / va / va apporter) incorrectly conjugates the final verb as if Marie's backpack is presenting itself — "je" is still the subject, so it must be vais, not va. Choice B (vais / vais / vais) ignores the subject change entirely in the second clause, forcing aller to agree with "je" even when "Mon exposé" is the subject. Choice D (va parler / va commencer / vais apporter) misreads "je" in the first sentence as a third-person subject — a classic slip when reading quickly. The strategy here: before conjugating aller, always pause and identify who or what is doing the action in that specific clause. Subject-verb agreement resets with every new subject, even mid-paragraph.

Question 2

Un étudiant souhaite corriger la phrase suivante pour qu'elle exprime correctement un plan futur proche avec tous les éléments requis (lieu, heure, futur proche) : « Demain, Lucas organise une réunion au bureau à 14h. » Laquelle des reformulations suivantes améliore cette phrase en utilisant le futur proche tout en conservant le sens original ?

  1. Demain, Lucas organiserait une réunion au bureau à 14h.
  2. Demain, Lucas organisera une réunion au bureau à 14h.
  3. Demain, Lucas a organisé une réunion au bureau à 14h.
  4. Demain, Lucas va organiser une réunion au bureau à 14h. (correct answer)
Explanation: When a question asks you to express a near-future plan (futur proche) in French, your first instinct should be to identify the correct grammatical structure: aller (conjugated) + infinitive. This tense is used specifically to talk about something that is going to happen soon or is already planned. The sentence "Demain, Lucas organise une réunion au bureau à 14h" uses the present tense (organise), which can imply a future event in casual French, but it doesn't explicitly use the futur proche as required. The correct reformulation needs three elements: a time reference (demain), a location (au bureau), and the futur proche construction. Answer D — "Demain, Lucas va organiser une réunion au bureau à 14h" — nails all three. Va is the third-person singular of aller, followed by the infinitive organiser, forming a textbook futur proche. Looking at the wrong answers: A uses organiserait, which is the conditional tense — it expresses hypothetical situations ("would organize"), not planned future events. B uses organisera, the simple future tense (futur simple) — grammatically correct for future events, but this is a different tense than futur proche and doesn't satisfy the question's requirement. C uses a organisé, the passé composé — this expresses something that already happened in the past, which directly contradicts "demain." A handy tip: whenever you see futur proche specified, immediately look for aller + infinitive. If the verb isn't structured that way, eliminate it — no matter how future-sounding it seems.

Question 3

Sophie présente ses plans à sa classe de français :

« Dimanche prochain, nous allons organiser une fête d'anniversaire pour ma mère. La fête va commencer à 15h00 chez ma tante, dans le quartier de Montmartre. Tous mes cousins vont arriver à 14h30 pour préparer les décorations avant le début de la fête. »

D'après la présentation de Sophie, quel énoncé décrit le plus précisément les détails de temps et de lieu de cet événement ?

  1. La fête commence à 15h00 chez la tante de Sophie, et les cousins arrivent 30 minutes avant le début pour préparer les décorations. (correct answer)
  2. La fête commence à 14h30 chez la tante de Sophie, et les cousins arrivent 30 minutes avant pour décorer la salle.
  3. La fête commence à 15h00 au domicile de Sophie à Montmartre, et les cousins arrivent en même temps que les invités.
  4. La fête commence à 15h00 chez la tante de Sophie, et les cousins arrivent en même temps que les autres invités à 15h00.
Explanation: When a question asks you to identify the most precise description of time and place details, your job is to match every specific detail in the passage — not just some of them. Even one small inaccuracy makes an answer wrong. Sophie's presentation gives you three key facts: the party starts at 15h00, it takes place chez sa tante in Montmartre, and the cousins arrive at 14h30 — which is 30 minutes before the party begins — to prepare the decorations. Answer A captures all three of these details accurately: 15h00 start time, the aunt's home as the location, and cousins arriving 30 minutes early to prepare decorations. That's your correct answer. Now look at why each distractor fails. B incorrectly states the party starts at 14h30 — that's actually when the cousins arrive, not when the party begins. This is a classic time-confusion trap. C gets the start time right (15h00) but places the party at Sophie's own home, when the passage clearly says chez ma tante. It also falsely claims the cousins arrive at the same time as other guests, which contradicts the passage. D gets the start time and location correct, but then says the cousins arrive at 15h00 with the other guests — directly contradicting the passage, which specifies they come at 14h30 before the party starts. A useful strategy: when reading comprehension questions involve times and places, quickly jot down or mentally list each specific detail (who, when, where) and then check each answer choice against your list. Distractors almost always swap one or two details to test whether you read carefully.

Question 4

Un élève veut présenter le plan suivant : « She is going to present her project at the town hall next Thursday at 10 AM. » Lequel des énoncés suivants contient une erreur grammaticale dans l'utilisation du futur proche ?

  1. Elle va présenter son projet à la mairie jeudi prochain à 10h00.
  2. Elle va présenter son projet jeudi prochain à la mairie à 10h00.
  3. Elle aller présenter son projet à la mairie jeudi prochain à 10h00. (correct answer)
  4. Elle va présenter son projet à 10h00 à la mairie jeudi prochain.
Explanation: When working with the futur proche in French, the structure is always: subject + conjugated form of "aller" + infinitive. The verb "aller" must be fully conjugated to match the subject — this is the heart of what this question tests. Option C contains the grammatical error: "Elle aller présenter son projet..." uses the infinitive form of "aller" instead of the conjugated form "va." Because the subject is "elle" (third person singular), "aller" must become "va." Writing "aller" here is like saying "She to go present" in English — the auxiliary verb is broken, making the entire construction incorrect. Options A, B, and D are all grammatically correct. They each use "Elle va présenter," which properly conjugates "aller" for the third person singular. The only difference among A, B, and D is the word order of time and place expressions (e.g., "à la mairie" and "jeudi prochain" appear in different sequences). In French, adverbial phrases of time and place can generally be rearranged without creating a grammatical error, so all three remain valid. This is a common trap — students sometimes second-guess word order and overlook the real issue, which is verb conjugation. Study tip: Whenever you use futur proche, mentally check two things: (1) Is "aller" fully conjugated? (je vais, tu vas, il/elle va, nous allons, vous allez, ils/elles vont) and (2) Is the main verb in the infinitive? If either piece is wrong, the construction fails. Don't let flexible word order distract you from the verb form itself.

Question 5

Lisez le message suivant:

« Salut ! Je   aller au cinéma samedi soir à 20h avec mes amis. Le film commence à la Cinémathèque du centre-ville. Tu veux venir ? »

Quelle forme verbale complète correctement la phrase pour exprimer un plan futur proche et correspond au sujet « je » ?

  1. vais (correct answer)
  2. vas
  3. irai
  4. allons
Explanation: When you see a question asking you to complete a sentence about a near future plan in French, your first instinct should be to think about the futur proche construction: sujet + conjugaison de "aller" au présent + infinitif. This tense is used to describe something that is going to happen soon, and the key is matching the verb "aller" to the correct subject. Here, the subject is "je", and the infinitive that follows is "aller" (to go). So you need the present-tense conjugation of "aller" for "je," which is "vais." That makes choice A the correct answer — je vais aller au cinéma means "I am going to go to the cinema," perfectly expressing a near-future plan. Looking at the distractors: B) "vas" is the present-tense form of "aller" for tu (you), not je. Using it here creates a subject-verb agreement error. C) "irai" is the simple future tense (futur simple) of "aller" for je, which does express a future idea, but the question specifically asks for futur proche — and futur simple does not use the "aller + infinitif" construction. D) "allons" is the nous (we) form of "aller," which doesn't match the subject "je" at all. A handy tip: whenever you spot futur proche, immediately identify the subject and mentally run through the present-tense conjugations of "aller" — vais, vas, va, allons, allez, vont — then match to the correct subject before choosing your answer.

Question 6

Un étudiant veut présenter oralement ce plan en français : « My friends and I are going to meet at the library at 6 PM on Friday. » Laquelle des phrases suivantes est la traduction la plus précise et la plus naturelle en utilisant le futur proche ?

  1. Mes amis et moi allons nous retrouver à la bibliothèque à 18h00 vendredi. (correct answer)
  2. Mes amis et moi irons nous retrouver à la bibliothèque à 18h00 vendredi.
  3. Mes amis et moi allons se retrouver à la bibliothèque à 18h00 vendredi.
  4. Mes amis et moi allons retrouver à la bibliothèque à 18h00 vendredi.
Explanation: When translating a sentence like this into French using the futur proche, you need to check three things simultaneously: the correct tense construction, the right reflexive pronoun, and whether the infinitive itself is present. The futur proche is formed with a conjugated form of aller + infinitive. Here, "to meet up" is the reflexive verb se retrouver, so the full infinitive must stay intact as se retrouver — but the reflexive pronoun must agree with the subject. Since the subject is Mes amis et moi (a "nous" equivalent), the pronoun shifts to nous, giving you nous retrouver. Combined with the conjugated aller form allons, the correct construction is allons nous retrouver. That's exactly what A gives you, making it the most precise and natural translation. B is wrong because irons nous retrouver uses the futur simple (irons = we will go), not the futur proche. The question specifically asks for futur proche, so this tense mismatch disqualifies it entirely. C looks almost right, but contains a critical pronoun error: se retrouver keeps the third-person reflexive pronoun se, which doesn't match the subject Mes amis et moi. When the subject is nous-like, the pronoun must be nous, not se. D drops the reflexive pronoun entirely, turning se retrouver into just retrouver, which changes the meaning — retrouver without a pronoun means "to find (something)," not "to meet up." Study tip: With reflexive verbs in the futur proche, always adjust the pronoun to match the subject before the infinitive: je vais me laver, nous allons nous retrouver. Don't leave se unchanged when the subject changes.

Question 7

Écoutez la présentation de Thomas :

« Ce soir, mes colocataires et moi allons préparer un dîner pour fêter la fin des examens. On va cuisiner à l'appartement à partir de 18h. Nos amis vont arriver vers 20h pour manger ensemble. Après le dîner, tout le monde va regarder un film. »

Thomas veut ajouter une phrase qui présente un plan supplémentaire avec une heure précise et un lieu. Laquelle des phrases suivantes correspond le mieux au style et à la structure de sa présentation existante ?

  1. Le lendemain matin, nous prendrons le petit-déjeuner ensemble au café du coin à 9h30.
  2. Le lendemain matin, nous allons prendre le petit-déjeuner ensemble au café du coin à 9h30. (correct answer)
  3. Le lendemain matin, nous prenons le petit-déjeuner ensemble au café du coin à 9h30.
  4. Le lendemain matin, nous avons pris le petit-déjeuner ensemble au café du coin à 9h30.
Explanation: When a question asks you to match the style and structure of an existing passage, your first move should be to identify what verb tense and construction the author is already using — then find the answer that mirrors it. Look closely at Thomas's presentation: he consistently uses aller + infinitif (the futur proche) to talk about upcoming plans — "allons préparer," "va cuisiner," "vont arriver," "va regarder." This construction is the hallmark of informal, conversational French when discussing near-future events. The question asks you to continue in that same voice. Choice B — "nous allons prendre le petit-déjeuner ensemble au café du coin à 9h30" — uses futur proche with a specific time (9h30) and a specific place (café du coin), matching Thomas's structure perfectly. This is your answer. Choice A uses the futur simple (prendrons), which is grammatically correct for future plans but sounds more formal and literary. Thomas never uses futur simple, so this clashes with his established tone. Choice C uses the présent de l'indicatif (nous prenons), which can express future plans in French but only in very specific contexts, and it doesn't match the pattern Thomas has established throughout. Choice D uses the passé composé (nous avons pris), which expresses a completed past action. Since Thomas is describing plans that haven't happened yet, a past tense makes no logical sense here. Study tip: On style-matching questions, always scan the passage for the dominant verb construction first. In conversational French, futur proche signals informality — if you see it used repeatedly, that's your target tense.

Question 8

Un étudiant prépare une présentation orale sur ses plans pour le Nouvel An. Il veut inclure un lieu, une heure, et l'identité des participants. Lequel des énoncés suivants présente ces trois éléments de façon correcte et naturelle en utilisant le futur proche ?

  1. Ma famille et moi allons célébrer le Nouvel An dans mes grands-parents à minuit.
  2. Ma famille et moi allons célébrer le Nouvel An chez mes grands-parents à minuit. (correct answer)
  3. Ma famille et moi allons célébrer le Nouvel An chez mes grands-parents depuis minuit.
  4. Ma famille et moi allons célébrer le Nouvel An à chez mes grands-parents à minuit.
Explanation: When describing a location in French, the preposition you choose matters enormously — and this question tests exactly that. Before selecting an answer, ask yourself: what preposition correctly introduces a person's home as a destination or location? The expression chez is the key here. In French, chez means "at the home of" or "at the place of" and is always used before a person or group of people. So "chez mes grands-parents" correctly communicates at my grandparents' house. Option B uses this structure perfectly, combines it with the near future (allons célébrer), and closes with the time marker à minuit — giving you all three required elements: participants, place, and time, all grammatically and naturally expressed. Here's why the other options fail: A uses dans mes grands-parents, which is nonsensical — dans means "inside" and applies to physical spaces (buildings, rooms, countries), not people. You cannot be physically "inside" a person. C replaces à minuit with depuis minuit, which means "since midnight" — implying an ongoing action that started at midnight, not a celebration happening at midnight. That's the wrong temporal relationship entirely. D writes à chez mes grands-parents, which is a double-preposition error; chez already functions as a complete prepositional phrase, so adding à before it is redundant and ungrammatical. A useful rule of thumb: whenever a location refers to someone's home or personal space, reach for chez + person. Save dans, en, and à for physical places, regions, and cities respectively.

Question 9

Voici la présentation écrite d'Amélie :

« La semaine prochaine, mon club de théâtre va organiser un spectacle. Les répétitions vont avoir lieu mardi et jeudi de 17h à 19h dans la salle des arts du lycée. Le spectacle final va se dérouler vendredi soir à 20h30 dans l'auditorium municipal. Les billets vont coûter cinq euros par personne. »

Combien d'heures de répétition au total Amélie et son club vont-ils consacrer avant le spectacle final, d'après sa présentation ?

  1. Huit heures au total, car les répétitions de 17h à 19h se déroulent sur quatre jours différents de la semaine.
  2. Deux heures au total, car une seule répétition de deux heures est mentionnée explicitement dans le texte.
  3. Six heures au total, car les répétitions ont lieu mardi, jeudi et vendredi avant le spectacle du soir.
  4. Quatre heures au total, car il y a deux répétitions de deux heures chacune (mardi et jeudi). (correct answer)
Explanation: When reading a French passage for specific numerical details, always extract the raw facts first before doing any arithmetic. This question tests both reading comprehension and basic calculation. The passage states clearly: "Les répétitions vont avoir lieu mardi et jeudi de 17h à 19h." That gives you two rehearsal days — Tuesday and Thursday — each running from 17h to 19h, which is exactly two hours per session. So the total rehearsal time is 2 sessions×2 hours=4 hours2 \text{ sessions} \times 2 \text{ hours} = 4 \text{ hours}, making D the correct answer. Here's why the other choices fall apart: A claims four days of rehearsals, but the text only mentions two days (mardi and jeudi). Multiplying 2 hours by 4 days is a fabrication — nothing in the passage supports a fourth rehearsal day. B says only one rehearsal is mentioned, which misreads the passage — two separate days (mardi et jeudi) are explicitly listed, so two sessions exist. C adds Friday to the rehearsal schedule, but vendredi is the night of the spectacle final, not a rehearsal. Including it as a practice day confuses the performance with the preparation. The key trap here is C — students sometimes skim and lump all mentioned days together without distinguishing their purpose. Always ask: what is each day used for? Mardi and jeudi = rehearsals; vendredi = performance. Study tip: In French reading comprehension, underline each day/time mentioned and label its purpose. A day with a time doesn't automatically mean a rehearsal — context determines function.