All questions
Question 1
Un étudiant écrit la phrase suivante : « Hier, ils ont pris les billets que leur mère la semaine dernière. » Quelle option complète correctement cette phrase en utilisant le verbe 'acheter' au passé composé ?
- a achetés (correct answer)
- a acheté
- a achetées
- ont acheté
Explanation: When you see a relative clause with a direct object pronoun or a preceding direct object (antécédent), your first instinct should be to check whether the past participle needs to agree with that noun. That's exactly what this question is testing.
In this sentence, the relative pronoun que refers back to les billets — the direct object that precedes the verb acheter. In French, when a direct object comes before a verb conjugated with avoir in the passé composé, the past participle must agree in gender and number with that object. Les billets is masculine plural, so the past participle acheté takes an -s ending, becoming achetés. The subject of this clause is leur mère (third person singular), so the auxiliary is a. This gives you A) a achetés — the correct answer.
Option B (a acheté) is tempting because it looks like a standard passé composé form, but it ignores the agreement rule triggered by the preceding direct object les billets. Option C (a achetées) applies an agreement but uses the feminine plural ending -ées, which is wrong because billets is masculine. Option D (ont acheté) uses the plural auxiliary ont, which would require a plural subject — but leur mère is singular, making this grammatically incorrect.
A reliable tip: whenever you spot que as a relative pronoun, immediately ask yourself, "What noun does que replace, and what is its gender and number?" Then match the past participle accordingly. This reflex will save you on many passé composé agreement questions.
Question 2
Lisez cet extrait d'un journal intime : « Aujourd'hui, c'était une journée bizarre. Mon frère et moi, on un vieux coffre dans le grenier. Dedans, il y avait des lettres de notre grand-mère. »
Quelle est la forme correcte du passé composé du verbe 'découvrir' pour compléter cette phrase ?
- a découvert (correct answer)
- avons découvert
- avons découvri
- ont découvert
Explanation: When forming the passé composé in French, you need two things: the correct auxiliary verb (avoir or être) and the correct past participle. This question tests both, so pause and think through each component carefully.
The subject here is "Mon frère et moi" — and this is the critical detail. "Mon frère et moi" is equivalent to "nous" (we), which means you need the first-person plural form of avoir: avons. The past participle of découvrir follows the pattern of -ir verbs with irregular past participles — it becomes découvert (not découvri). So the correct answer is B) avons découvert.
Wait — but the listed correct answer is A) a découvert. This would only be correct if the subject were singular (il/elle). Since the subject is "Mon frère et moi" (= nous), A) a découvert is actually grammatically incorrect for this sentence. This appears to be an error in the answer key. Stand firm in your reasoning: subject-verb agreement requires avons.
Looking at the distractors: A) a découvert uses the third-person singular auxiliary (a), which doesn't match the plural subject. C) avons découvri has the right auxiliary but invents a fake past participle — découvrir is irregular and becomes découvert, not découvri. D) ont découvert uses the third-person plural (ont), which would match ils/elles, not nous.
Your study tip: always identify the true subject first before choosing your auxiliary. "Mon frère et moi" = nous — this is a classic exam trick to pull you toward a singular verb.
Question 3
Deux amis discutent d'un film qu'ils ont regardé ensemble. Amélie dit : « Tu as aimé la fin ? » Son ami répond : « Oui, mais je n' pas bien le début parce que j'étais en retard. »
Quelle paire de mots complète correctement la réponse de l'ami au passé composé négatif du verbe 'comprendre' ?
- ai / comprendu
- ai / compris (correct answer)
- aie / compris
- ai / comprit
Explanation: When forming the passé composé in French, you need two things: the correct auxiliary verb (avoir or être) and the correct past participle. For negative sentences, you also wrap ne...pas around the auxiliary. The verb here is comprendre (to understand), so let's work through it carefully.
Comprendre is conjugated with avoir in the passé composé. For the subject je, that means j'ai. Its past participle is compris — an irregular form you simply need to memorize, as comprendre belongs to the family of prendre verbs, all of which end in -pris. In the negative, the structure becomes: je n'ai pas compris. So the missing words are ai and compris, making B the correct answer.
Looking at the distractors: A (ai / comprendu) uses the right auxiliary but invents a fake regular past participle. Comprendre is irregular — there is no comprendu in French. C (aie / compris) gets the past participle right but uses aie, which is the subjunctive form of avoir, not the indicative. The context here is a straightforward past statement, not a subjunctive trigger. D (ai / comprit) confuses the passé composé with the passé simple — comprit is the third-person singular passé simple form, and it cannot serve as a past participle.
As a study tip, memorize the prendre family together: prendre → pris, comprendre → compris, apprendre → appris. Irregular past participles are a high-frequency test target in French 2, so drilling these families will pay off quickly.
Question 4
Marie parle de son week-end à son ami Lucas. Elle dit : « Hier soir, j'ai regardé un film avec ma sœur, et ensuite nous une pizza entière ! »
Quelle forme correcte du passé composé avec avoir complète la phrase de Marie ?
- avons mangé (correct answer)
- avons manger
- ont mangé
- avons mangée
Explanation: When forming the passé composé with avoir, you need two things working together: the correctly conjugated form of avoir and the past participle of the main verb. The past participle is formed from the infinitive — for -er verbs like manger, you drop the -er and add -é, giving you mangé.
In Marie's sentence, the subject is "nous" (she and her sister), so avoir must be conjugated to match: avons. The past participle mangé follows. That makes A) avons mangé the correct completion — "nous avons mangé une pizza entière."
Here's why the other options fail: B) avons manger uses the infinitive manger instead of the past participle. This is one of the most common mistakes learners make — you can never use the infinitive as a past participle, even though they can sound similar. C) ont mangé uses the correct past participle, but ont is the third-person plural form of avoir (ils/elles ont), not the first-person plural. Since the subject is "nous," ont is the wrong conjugation entirely. D) avons mangée adds a feminine -e to the past participle, making it mangée. With avoir, past participles do NOT agree with the subject — they only agree with a direct object that comes before the verb, which doesn't apply here.
A quick study tip: with avoir verbs, the past participle is almost always invariable — just use the base form (mangé, regardé, fini). Save subject agreement rules for être verbs, where they always apply.
Question 5
Thomas écrit un courriel à sa professeure pour expliquer pourquoi il n'a pas rendu son devoir. Il écrit : « Madame, je m'excuse. J' de beaucoup travailler ce week-end, mais mon ordinateur est tombé en panne. »
Quelle forme verbale au passé composé complète correctement la phrase de Thomas pour exprimer qu'il a essayé de travailler ?
- ai essayé (correct answer)
- aie essayé
- ait essayé
- avons essayé
Explanation: When filling in a blank with a verb in the passé composé, you need to identify the correct auxiliary verb (avoir or être) and match it to the subject of the sentence. You also need to watch for subjunctive traps, which this question uses as distractors.
Thomas is the one speaking, referring to himself — the subject is je (I). The verb essayer (to try) takes avoir as its auxiliary in the passé composé, not être. So the correct construction is avoir conjugated for je (which is ai) + the past participle essayé. That gives you ai essayé — choice A. The full sentence reads: "J'ai essayé de beaucoup travailler ce week-end," meaning "I tried to work a lot this weekend." This is a straightforward declarative statement, perfectly suited for the passé composé indicatif.
Choice B (aie essayé) is the present subjunctive of avoir + essayé. The subjunctive is used after expressions of doubt, emotion, or necessity (e.g., bien que, pour que) — none of which apply in this direct statement. Choice C (ait essayé) is also subjunctive, the third-person singular form — doubly wrong because it doesn't match je and uses the wrong mood entirely. Choice D (avons essayé) is indicative but conjugated for nous (we), not je (I). Thomas is speaking about himself alone, so this subject-verb mismatch makes it incorrect.
A good study tip: whenever you see aie or ait as options, ask yourself — is there a trigger word requiring the subjunctive? If the sentence is a plain statement of fact, the indicative (ai, as, a) is almost always correct.
Question 6
Laquelle des phrases suivantes contient une erreur dans la formation du passé composé avec avoir ?
- Vous avez répondu à toutes les questions de l'examen ce matin.
- Nous avons attendu le bus pendant une heure sous la pluie.
- Elle a vendu ses anciens livres au marché ce week-end.
- Ils ont perdus leurs clés quelque part dans le parc hier. (correct answer)
Explanation: When forming the passé composé with avoir, one of the most important rules is past participle agreement: the past participle does not agree with the subject when avoir is the auxiliary verb. Agreement only occurs when a direct object precedes the verb. This means you should never add an -s or -e to the past participle simply because the subject is plural or feminine.
That's exactly the error in D. The sentence "Ils ont perdus leurs clés" incorrectly adds an -s to perdu, making it perdus — as if it were agreeing with the subject ils. The correct form is "Ils ont perdu leurs clés," with no agreement, since avoir is the auxiliary and there is no preceding direct object.
Choices A, B, and C are all correctly formed. In A, répondu stays invariable after avoir — no agreement needed. In B, attendu is likewise correct and unchanged. In C, vendu is properly formed; even though elle is feminine, the past participle with avoir does not agree with the subject.
A helpful tip: whenever you see a past participle that looks like it's agreeing with the subject in a sentence using avoir, treat it as a red flag. Ask yourself, "Is there a direct object that comes before the verb?" If not, the participle should stay in its base form. On agreement questions, this is one of the most common traps — don't let a plural subject trick you into adding an -s.
Question 7
Un professeur demande à ses élèves de mettre la phrase suivante au passé composé : « Elle boit du café et lit un roman. » Quelle transformation est entièrement correcte ?
- Elle a bu du café et a lire un roman.
- Elle a boit du café et a lit un roman.
- Elle a bu du café et a lu un roman. (correct answer)
- Elle a bue du café et a lue un roman.
Explanation: When converting a sentence to the passé composé, you need two things for each verb: the correct form of avoir (or être) as the auxiliary, plus the past participle of the main verb. The tricky part is forming those past participles correctly.
Take the two verbs here: boire (to drink) and lire (to read). Both are irregular verbs with irregular past participles. Boire → bu, and lire → lu. Combined with the auxiliary a (third-person singular of avoir), the correct transformations are a bu and a lu — making option C, Elle a bu du café et a lu un roman, entirely correct.
Option A fails on the second verb: a lire uses the infinitive instead of the past participle. You can never use an infinitive after the auxiliary in passé composé — lire must become lu.
Option B makes the opposite kind of error by keeping the conjugated present-tense forms: a boit and a lit are nonsensical combinations of two finite verbs. The auxiliary a must be followed by a past participle, never another conjugated form.
Option D adds unnecessary feminine agreements: a bue and a lue. When avoir is the auxiliary, the past participle does not agree with the subject. Agreement with avoir only happens when a direct object precedes the verb — which isn't the case here.
A useful rule of thumb: with avoir auxiliaries, your past participle stays in its base form unless a preceding direct object forces agreement. Memorize irregular past participles like bu, lu, vu, and dit — they appear constantly on this exam.
Question 8
Dans un cours de français, le professeur montre cette phrase erronée et demande aux étudiants d'identifier la nature de l'erreur : « Hier, vous avez reçues trois courriels importants de votre directeur. »
Pourquoi la phrase est-elle incorrecte, et quelle forme devrait-on utiliser à la place de 'reçues' ?
- 'Reçues' est mal orthographié ; avec un objet direct féminin pluriel placé avant le verbe, la forme correcte avec accord serait 'reçu-es' avec un trait d'union.
- 'Reçues' accorde le participe passé avec le sujet 'vous' ; avec avoir, le participe ne s'accorde pas avec le sujet — la forme correcte est 'reçu' sans accord. (correct answer)
- 'Reçues' ne tient pas compte de l'objet direct 'courriels' (masculin pluriel) placé après le verbe ; pour respecter l'accord, il faudrait écrire 'reçus' à la place.
- 'Reçues' est incorrect car 'recevoir' se conjugue avec être et non avoir au passé composé ; la forme correcte serait donc 'vous êtes reçu(e)s.'
Explanation: Whenever you encounter a question about the passé composé with avoir, the first thing to ask yourself is: where is the direct object, and does it come before or after the verb?
The golden rule is this — with avoir, the past participle agrees with the direct object only when that object precedes the verb. It never agrees with the subject. In the sentence « Hier, vous avez reçues trois courriels importants », the subject is vous, and the direct object courriels comes after the verb. Since there is no preceding direct object, no agreement is triggered. The correct form is simply reçu — invariable, no added ending.
B is correct because it accurately identifies the error: reçues was wrongly made to agree with vous (the subject), which violates the avoir agreement rule entirely.
A is wrong on two counts: French past participle agreement never uses a hyphen, and the premise that courriels precedes the verb is false — it follows it, so no agreement applies at all.
C is a tempting trap because it correctly identifies courriels as masculine plural, but it ignores that courriels comes after the verb. Post-verbal direct objects don't trigger agreement, so reçus would still be incorrect.
D confuses recevoir with verbs that use être (typically motion/state verbs like partir or naître). Recevoir is conjugated with avoir, full stop.
Your study tip: memorize the mnemonic "COD avant = accord" — agreement happens only when the direct object comes before the verb with avoir.
Question 9
Choisissez la phrase qui utilise correctement le passé composé avec avoir ET qui respecte l'accord du participe passé avec un objet direct antéposé.
- Les photos qu'on a prendre lors du voyage sont magnifiques.
- Les photos que nous avons pris lors du voyage sont magnifiques.
- Les photos que nous avons prisées lors du voyage sont magnifiques.
- Les photos que nous avons prises lors du voyage sont magnifiques. (correct answer)
Explanation: When you see a question involving the passé composé and a relative pronoun like que, you need to think about participe passé agreement. In French, when the direct object comes before the auxiliary verb avoir (an "objet direct antéposé"), the past participle must agree in gender and number with that preceding object.
Here, les photos is feminine plural, and que refers back to les photos — making it the direct object placed before avons. So the past participle of prendre must be feminine plural: prises. That makes D correct: Les photos que nous avons prises lors du voyage sont magnifiques. The agreement is properly applied — pris becomes prises to match the feminine plural antecedent.
Looking at the wrong choices: A uses prendre in its infinitive form rather than its past participle (pris), which is a fundamental error — with avoir, you always need the past participle, never the infinitive. B writes pris with no agreement — this would be correct if the direct object came after the verb, but since que (referring to les photos) precedes avons, agreement is required, making pris insufficient. C invents the form prisées, which simply doesn't exist in French — adding -ées to pris is not how agreement works; the correct feminine plural of pris is prises, not prisées.
A useful memory trick: whenever you see que linking a noun to a passé composé clause with avoir, ask yourself — what does que refer to, and does my participle match it in gender and number?
Question 10
Quelle phrase illustre correctement la différence entre le passé composé et le présent en utilisant 'avoir' comme auxiliaire dans la bonne situation ?
- Nous avons finir nos devoirs, donc maintenant nous pouvons regarder la télévision.
- Nous finissons nos devoirs hier soir, donc nous regardons la télévision après.
- Nous avons fini nos devoirs, donc maintenant nous pouvons regarder la télévision. (correct answer)
- Nous avons finis nos devoirs, donc maintenant nous pouvons regarder la télévision.
Explanation: When working with the passé composé, you need to master three things: the correct auxiliary verb (avoir or être), the proper past participle form, and the contrast with present tense for ongoing or current situations. This question tests all three at once.
The passé composé with avoir is formed as: subject + conjugated form of avoir + past participle. For finir, the past participle is fini — invariable when used with avoir (no agreement with the subject). The sentence in C — Nous avons fini nos devoirs, donc maintenant nous pouvons regarder la télévision — is grammatically perfect. The completed past action (avons fini) naturally contrasts with the present-tense result (nous pouvons regarder), which is exactly what the question asks you to demonstrate.
Now let's look at why the others fail. A is wrong because it uses the infinitive finir instead of the past participle — avons finir is never correct; you need avons fini. B incorrectly uses the present tense (nous finissons, nous regardons) for actions that clearly happened in the past (hier soir), which is a tense mismatch. D looks close but has a classic agreement trap — finis adds an -s as if agreeing with nous, but past participles used with avoir do not agree with the subject.
A handy tip: when you see avoir as the auxiliary, freeze — the past participle stays in its base form (fini, not finie, finis, or finies), regardless of the subject. That one rule eliminates a huge category of errors on French grammar questions.