French 1 Quiz: Interpreting Signs And Posters
8 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Interpreting Signs And PostersQuestion 1 of 8

A sign at a French pharmacy reads: PHARMACIE DE GARDE — OUVERTE UNIQUEMENT LES NUITS ET WEEK-ENDS — SONNEZ POUR ÊTRE SERVI — ORDONNANCE REQUISE POUR LES MÉDICAMENTS SUR ORDONNANCE

It is Saturday at noon. A person needs to buy aspirin (available without a prescription) at this pharmacy. What must she do according to the sign?

She should ring the bell to be served — it is a weekend, the pharmacy is open, and aspirin does not require a prescription.
She cannot buy aspirin here because this pharmacy only dispenses medications to patients who present a prescription.
She should return on a weekday morning, since this pharmacy is closed during Saturday daytime hours.
She should obtain a prescription first, then ring the bell so the pharmacist on duty can assist her.
← Back to quizzes

French 1 Quiz

French 1 Quiz: Interpreting Signs And Posters

Practice Interpreting Signs And Posters in French 1 with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Interpreting Signs And Posters, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for French 1.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A sign at a French pharmacy reads: PHARMACIE DE GARDE — OUVERTE UNIQUEMENT LES NUITS ET WEEK-ENDS — SONNEZ POUR ÊTRE SERVI — ORDONNANCE REQUISE POUR LES MÉDICAMENTS SUR ORDONNANCE

It is Saturday at noon. A person needs to buy aspirin (available without a prescription) at this pharmacy. What must she do according to the sign?

  1. She should ring the bell to be served — it is a weekend, the pharmacy is open, and aspirin does not require a prescription. (correct answer)
  2. She cannot buy aspirin here because this pharmacy only dispenses medications to patients who present a prescription.
  3. She should return on a weekday morning, since this pharmacy is closed during Saturday daytime hours.
  4. She should obtain a prescription first, then ring the bell so the pharmacist on duty can assist her.
Explanation: When reading French signage, your goal is to extract only what the sign actually says — no more, no less. Break the sign into its individual claims before evaluating the answer choices. This sign says four things: it is a pharmacie de garde (an on-call/duty pharmacy), it is open uniquement les nuits et week-ends (only nights and weekends), you must sonner pour être servi (ring the bell to be served), and a prescription is requise (required) — but only pour les médicaments sur ordonnance (for prescription medications). That last phrase is the critical one. Since Saturday noon falls on a weekend, the pharmacy is open. Since aspirin is available without a prescription (sans ordonnance), the prescription requirement simply does not apply. The visitor only needs to ring the bell. That makes A the correct answer. B is a misreading — the sign does not say all medications require a prescription. It specifies "prescription medications," meaning the rule is conditional, not universal. Aspirin falls outside that condition entirely. C misreads week-ends as "weekday." Saturday is indeed a weekend day, so the pharmacy is open, not closed. This is a classic vocabulary trap — don't confuse week-end (weekend) with semaine (weekday). D combines the misreadings in B and C: it assumes a prescription is needed when it is not, which is incorrect for over-the-counter medications like aspirin. Study tip: On French reading comprehension questions, watch for conditional language — words like uniquement, seulement, or qualifying phrases. The scope of a rule often contains built-in exceptions that change the answer entirely.

Question 2

A sign on a door in a French school reads: FERMÉ LE LUNDI — OUVERT DU MARDI AU VENDREDI DE 8H À 17H

A student arrives at this office on a Tuesday at 5:15 p.m. What does the sign tell her?

  1. She can enter because Tuesday is an open day and she is within normal hours.
  2. She cannot enter because the office is closed on Tuesdays regardless of the time.
  3. She cannot enter because she has arrived after the closing time of 17h00. (correct answer)
  4. She can enter because the office is open every weekday until 18h00.
Explanation: When reading signs or schedules in French, your job is to extract all the conditions simultaneously — open days and open hours — because both must be satisfied for entry to be permitted. This sign gives you two pieces of information: the office is closed on Mondays (fermé le lundi), and it is open Tuesday through Friday (du mardi au vendredi) from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (de 8h à 17h). The student arrives on Tuesday — an open day — but at 17h15, which is fifteen minutes after the 17h00 closing time. That makes C the correct answer: she cannot enter because she has missed the closing time. Answer A is the most tempting trap. Tuesday is an open day, and many students stop reading there and assume she's fine. But being on an open day is only half the requirement — the time must also fall within the listed hours. 17h15 is past 17h00, so the condition is not fully met. Answer B is factually wrong in the opposite direction: the sign explicitly lists Tuesday as an open day, so the claim that the office is "closed on Tuesdays regardless of the time" contradicts the text entirely. Answer D invents a closing time of 18h00 that never appears in the sign — always anchor your answer to what the text actually says, not what seems reasonable. A good habit on any French schedule question: identify the open days first, then check the hours. Both boxes must be checked before you can conclude someone may enter.

Question 3

A poster at a French café reads: MENU DU JOUR — ENTRÉE + PLAT : 13€ — PLAT + DESSERT : 13€ — ENTRÉE + PLAT + DESSERT : 16€ — BOISSONS NON COMPRISES

A customer orders the full three-course menu (entrée, plat, dessert) and a coffee. What is the minimum amount she will pay, based on the poster?

  1. 13€, because she can split the meal into two two-course menus and pay only once.
  2. 16€, because the three-course menu is 16€ and coffee is included in all menus.
  3. 26€, because she must order two separate two-course menus to get all three courses, paying 13€ each.
  4. More than 16€, because the three-course menu costs 16€ and drinks are not included, so the coffee adds to that total. (correct answer)
Explanation: When reading a French café menu, treat each line as a separate, literal pricing rule — don't assume anything is bundled or shared across options. The poster lists three distinct menu options: entrée + plat for 13€, plat + dessert for 13€, and entrée + plat + dessert for 16€. The final note — BOISSONS NON COMPRISES — means "drinks not included." This applies universally; no menu option covers beverages. So when the customer orders the three-course menu plus a coffee, she pays 16€ for the food, then an additional amount for the coffee. The total exceeds 16€, making D the correct answer. A is wrong on two levels: you cannot split one meal across two menu options to pay only once, and even if you could, you'd be paying for two separate menus — not zero extra cost. The logic is circular and invented. B is wrong because it directly contradicts BOISSONS NON COMPRISES. Coffee is a boisson (drink), and the poster explicitly states drinks are not included in any menu. Never assume inclusion unless the menu says so. C is wrong because the poster does offer a three-course menu for 16€ — there's no need to combine two 13€ menus. Ordering two two-course menus would actually cost more (13+13=26€13 + 13 = 26€) and is unnecessary. Study tip: On French-1 reading comprehension questions, pay close attention to exclusion phrases like non compris(e) ("not included") or en supplément ("extra charge") — they frequently appear in café and restaurant contexts and are designed to test whether you read every detail of the passage.

Question 4

A sign on a French library door reads: BIBLIOTHÈQUE — OUVERT AU PUBLIC : MARDI–SAMEDI 10H–19H — EMPRUNT MAXIMUM : 5 LIVRES — DURÉE DU PRÊT : 3 SEMAINES — RENOUVELLEMENT POSSIBLE UNE SEULE FOIS

A library member checks out 4 books on a Tuesday. She renews them once after 3 weeks. How many total weeks may she keep the books before they are overdue?

  1. 6 weeks, because the original 3-week loan plus one 3-week renewal gives a total of 6 weeks. (correct answer)
  2. 3 weeks, because renewing a loan simply restarts the same 3-week period rather than adding extra time.
  3. 9 weeks, because the borrower may renew twice, each renewal adding 3 weeks to the original loan period.
  4. 4 weeks, because each renewal adds only one extra week to the standard 3-week loan period.
Explanation: When reading informational French texts like signs or notices, your job is to extract specific rules and apply them carefully — this tests both vocabulary comprehension and logical reasoning. The sign states DURÉE DU PRÊT : 3 SEMAINES (loan duration: 3 weeks) and RENOUVELLEMENT POSSIBLE UNE SEULE FOIS (renewal possible one time only). So the borrower gets 3 weeks initially, and one renewal adds another 3 weeks on top. That gives: 3+3=6 semaines (weeks)3 + 3 = 6 \text{ semaines (weeks)} This makes A correct. The member checks out her books Tuesday, keeps them 3 weeks, renews once for an additional 3 weeks, and must return them after 6 total weeks. B is wrong because it misunderstands what a renewal (renouvellement) means. Renewing does not "restart" the clock — it extends it. A renewal would be pointless if it simply reset to the same deadline. C is wrong because it invents a second renewal that the sign explicitly does not allow. Une seule fois means "one time only" — there is no second renewal permitted, so 9 weeks is impossible under these rules. D is wrong because it fabricates a rule where each renewal adds only one week. The sign specifies the loan period is 3 weeks (3 semaines), and a renewal logically extends by that same period — nothing in the sign suggests a different, shorter extension. Study tip: When French signage uses une seule fois or seulement, pay close attention — these limiting phrases are frequently the key to answering the question correctly.

Question 5

A sign in a French supermarket reads: ARTICLES EN SOLDE — RÉDUCTION DE 20% SUR TOUS LES PRODUITS MARQUÉS EN ROUGE — SAUF LES BOISSONS ET LES PRODUITS SURGELÉS

A shopper wants to buy a red-tagged bottle of juice and a red-tagged sweater. According to the sign, which items will receive the 20% discount?

  1. Both the juice and the sweater will receive the 20% discount because both are tagged in red.
  2. Neither item will receive the discount because the sale applies only to clothing, not food or drinks.
  3. Only the sweater will receive the 20% discount because beverages are excluded from the sale. (correct answer)
  4. Only the juice will receive the 20% discount because frozen and clothing items are excluded from the sale.
Explanation: When reading French signs or notices, your job is to identify both what qualifies for a deal and what is explicitly excluded. This sign offers 20% off all red-tagged products ("tous les produits marqués en rouge"), but then adds a critical exception: "SAUF les boissons et les produits surgelés" — meaning except beverages and frozen products. The word "sauf" is your key here. It means "except" or "unless," and it immediately cancels out any items that follow it. A red-tagged sweater is clothing, not a beverage or frozen item, so it qualifies for the discount. A bottle of juice, however, is a boisson (beverage), which the sign explicitly excludes — even if it carries a red tag. The red tag alone isn't enough; the item must also not fall under the exceptions. So C is correct: only the sweater receives the 20% discount. A is wrong because it ignores the "sauf" clause entirely — being red-tagged is a necessary condition, but not a sufficient one. B is wrong because it invents a restriction the sign never states; nothing limits the sale to clothing only. D is wrong on two counts: juice is excluded as a boisson, not because of the frozen goods rule, and sweaters are never mentioned as excluded — this answer reverses the logic completely. Your study tip: always scan French commercial or instructional text for exception words like sauf, except, à l'exclusion de, or hormis. These words flip the meaning and are favorite spots for trick questions.

Question 6

A notice posted at a French train station reads: ATTENTION — LES BILLETS DOIVENT ÊTRE COMPOSTÉS AVANT DE MONTER DANS LE TRAIN. LES CONTRÔLEURS VÉRIFIENT LES BILLETS À BORD.

A traveler buys a valid ticket but boards the train without compostage, planning to show the ticket to the inspector on board. What does the sign suggest about this plan?

  1. The plan will work fine because showing a valid ticket to the inspector satisfies all requirements listed on the sign.
  2. The plan is risky because the ticket must be validated (composté) before boarding, which the traveler has not done. (correct answer)
  3. The plan will work fine because inspectors only check tickets, not whether they have been validated.
  4. The plan is risky because inspectors do not board regional trains, only intercity ones.
Explanation: When reading authentic French notices and signs, your job is to extract precise meaning from each sentence — not just skim for familiar words. This question tests both your French reading comprehension and your real-world understanding of the French rail system's compostage requirement. The sign contains two distinct instructions: first, "les billets doivent être compostés avant de monter dans le train" — tickets must be validated before boarding. Second, "les contrôleurs vérifient les billets à bord" — inspectors check tickets on board. The traveler's plan ignores the first requirement entirely. Having a valid ticket is not the same as having a composté ticket. The traveler failed to use the validation machine before boarding, meaning B is correct — the plan is risky because the critical pre-boarding step was skipped. A misreads the sign by treating both sentences as equivalent: it assumes showing a ticket to the inspector fulfills all obligations. But the sign explicitly separates the two requirements — validation happens before boarding, inspection happens on board. C commits the same error more boldly, claiming inspectors only check tickets and not validation status — but the whole point of compostage is that the stamp proves when and where you validated, something inspectors are specifically trained to check. D invents a detail entirely; the sign says nothing about regional versus intercity trains, making this a distractor based on outside information the passage does not support. A useful strategy: when a passage contains a list of requirements, treat each sentence as a separate rule. French official notices are precise — don't collapse two distinct obligations into one.

Question 7

A sign at the entrance of a French museum reads: ENTRÉE GRATUITE POUR LES MOINS DE 18 ANS ET LES ÉTUDIANTS AVEC CARTE — TARIF RÉDUIT POUR LES SENIORS (65 ANS ET PLUS) — PLEIN TARIF : 12€

A 22-year-old university student with a valid student card and her 66-year-old grandfather visit the museum together. What is the total cost of their admission?

  1. 0€, because students and seniors both qualify for free entry according to the sign.
  2. 12€, because only the grandfather pays the full 12€ rate and the student enters free with her card.
  3. 24€, because both visitors are adults over 18 and must pay the full 12€ plein tarif each.
  4. The grandfather pays a reduced rate and the student pays nothing, so the total is less than 12€ but the exact reduced amount is not stated. (correct answer)
Explanation: When reading French signs that list multiple pricing tiers, your job is to match each visitor to the correct category — and notice when a sign gives you incomplete information. The sign establishes three tiers: free entry (entrée gratuite) for those under 18 or students with a card, a reduced rate (tarif réduit) for seniors 65 and older, and a full price (plein tarif) of 12€. The 22-year-old student presents her valid student card, so she qualifies for free admission — 0€. Her 66-year-old grandfather falls into the senior category, which earns him a tarif réduit. Here's the critical detail: the sign tells us a reduced rate exists but never states what that reduced amount is. We know the total is less than 12€ (the grandfather's portion is less than 12€, and the student pays nothing), but we cannot calculate an exact figure. That makes D the only defensible answer. A is wrong because seniors are not listed under entrée gratuite — they receive a tarif réduit, which is a discount, not free entry. Conflating "reduced" with "free" is a classic reading trap. B is wrong because it assigns the grandfather the full 12€ plein tarif, ignoring that the sign explicitly carves out a separate, lower senior category for him. C is wrong because it ignores both pricing exceptions entirely, treating two adults as if no discounts apply — a misreading of the sign's conditions. On French-language reading questions, always map every person to every condition on the sign before calculating. If any figure is missing, "cannot be determined exactly" is often the correct answer.

Question 8

A sign at a French swimming pool reads: INTERDICTION DE COURIR — DOUCHE OBLIGATOIRE AVANT D'ENTRER DANS L'EAU — BONNET DE BAIN OBLIGATOIRE POUR TOUS — ACCÈS INTERDIT AUX CHIENS ET AUTRES ANIMAUX

A swimmer arrives wearing a swimsuit and swim cap and takes a shower before entering the pool. He also brought his dog, which he left tied outside. According to the sign, which of the following is true?

  1. The swimmer has violated two rules: he must not bring animals onto the property and he forgot to wear a bonnet de bain.
  2. The swimmer has complied with the rules that apply to him — showering and wearing a swim cap — and the dog is outside the restricted area. (correct answer)
  3. The swimmer has violated one rule because dogs must remain in a designated kennel area, not tied outside.
  4. The swimmer is not allowed to enter because the sign requires swimwear to be approved at the entrance desk first.
Explanation: When reading French public signs, your job is to match each rule to the situation described — nothing more, nothing less. Don't infer rules that aren't written, and don't assume violations that didn't happen. The sign lists four rules: no running, shower before entering, swim cap required for everyone, and no dogs or other animals allowed. The swimmer showers ✓, wears a swim cap ✓, and leaves the dog outside — which means the dog never enters the restricted area. The sign says access is forbidden to animals, and the dog was never given access. The swimmer has followed every rule that applies to him, making B the correct answer. A is wrong on two counts: the swimmer did wear a bonnet de bain (swim cap), so there's no violation there. Additionally, the dog was left outside — it wasn't brought into the forbidden area, so that rule wasn't broken either. C invents a rule. The sign says nothing about a "designated kennel area." You can only hold someone accountable for what the sign actually states — tying a dog outside the premises is not addressed, so you cannot call it a violation. D is entirely fabricated. The sign mentions nothing about swimwear approval at an entrance desk. Be careful with answer choices that introduce procedures or requirements with zero textual support. The key strategy here: stick strictly to the text. French reading comprehension questions often tempt you with answer choices that sound plausible but add details the passage never mentions. If the sign doesn't say it, it isn't a rule.