EPPP: Part 1, Knowledge Quiz: Study Design Types
20 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Study Design TypesQuestion 1 of 20

A study finds that children who were breastfed as infants have higher average IQ scores in adolescence than those who were not. The researchers obtained data on infant feeding practices and adolescent IQ from existing school and medical records. Because the researchers could not control which infants were breastfed, this study is best described as a:

longitudinal experimental design.
quasi-experimental design.
cross-sectional correlational design.
single-subject reversal design.
← Back to quizzes

EPPP: Part 1, Knowledge Quiz

EPPP: Part 1, Knowledge Quiz: Study Design Types

Practice Study Design Types in EPPP: Part 1, Knowledge with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Study Design Types, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for EPPP: Part 1, Knowledge.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A study finds that children who were breastfed as infants have higher average IQ scores in adolescence than those who were not. The researchers obtained data on infant feeding practices and adolescent IQ from existing school and medical records. Because the researchers could not control which infants were breastfed, this study is best described as a:

  1. longitudinal experimental design.
  2. quasi-experimental design. (correct answer)
  3. cross-sectional correlational design.
  4. single-subject reversal design.
Explanation: This is a quasi-experimental design, specifically an ex post facto ('after the fact') study. The researcher is examining the effect of a variable (breastfeeding) that has already occurred and cannot be manipulated, comparing two pre-existing groups based on their past exposure. While it shares features with correlational research, it is classified as quasi-experimental because it examines group differences based on a naturally occurring 'treatment' condition. It is not experimental because there was no random assignment to conditions.

Question 2

A research team wants to determine if a new form of cognitive-behavioral therapy causes a greater reduction in depressive symptoms than a well-established SSRI medication. To draw the strongest possible causal conclusion, which study design must the team employ?

  1. A quasi-experimental design where one clinic provides the CBT and another provides the SSRI.
  2. An experimental design involving random assignment of participants to either the CBT or SSRI condition. (correct answer)
  3. A correlational design tracking symptom reduction in patients who naturally choose either CBT or SSRIs.
  4. A series of case studies detailing the outcomes of several patients in each treatment modality.
Explanation: To establish a causal relationship, an experimental design is necessary. The defining features that allow for causal inference are the manipulation of the independent variable (treatment type) and the random assignment of participants to conditions. This process helps to ensure that the groups are equivalent at the outset, minimizing the influence of confounding variables. The other designs lack the random assignment necessary for strong causal claims.

Question 3

To test a behavioral intervention for a child with severe disruptive behaviors, a psychologist first records the frequency of outbursts for two weeks (baseline). Then, the psychologist implements a token economy system for two weeks and records the frequency. After that, the system is withdrawn for two weeks, and finally, it is reinstated. This A-B-A-B design is a type of:

  1. case study, because it focuses on only one child.
  2. experimental design, because an independent variable is systematically manipulated. (correct answer)
  3. quasi-experimental design, because there is no separate control group.
  4. correlational design, because it tracks the association between two variables over time.
Explanation: The A-B-A-B (reversal) design is a type of single-subject experimental design. It is considered experimental because the independent variable (the token economy) is systematically manipulated (introduced, withdrawn, and reintroduced) to demonstrate its effect on the dependent variable (outbursts). This systematic manipulation allows for inferences about causality, even with an N of 1. It is not a case study because of this systematic manipulation. It is not quasi-experimental because the experimental control (the reversal) establishes a clear link between the IV and DV. It is not correlational because a variable is being actively manipulated.

Question 4

A clinical neuropsychologist is working with a patient who, following a unique brain injury, has developed the ability to remember almost every detail of his life. The psychologist conducts extensive interviews, cognitive testing, and brain imaging over several years to understand the mechanisms of his memory. The findings are published as a detailed report. This research is best described as a:

  1. single-subject experimental design.
  2. longitudinal correlational study.
  3. quasi-experimental time-series design.
  4. case study. (correct answer)
Explanation: This is a classic example of a case study, which involves an intensive, in-depth investigation of a single individual, group, or event. The focus on a unique patient with a rare condition is a hallmark of this design. Distractor A is incorrect because a single-subject experimental design involves systematic manipulation of an independent variable (e.g., in an A-B-A-B design), which is not described here. Distractors B and C are incorrect as they typically involve larger groups and specific methodologies (measuring relationships over time or pre-post intervention effects) that don't fit the descriptive, in-depth nature of this investigation.

Question 5

A primary limitation of a study is determined to be the 'selection threat' to internal validity, where initial differences between the treatment and control groups may have accounted for the observed effects. This limitation is a hallmark characteristic that distinguishes which two designs?

  1. Correlational from case study designs.
  2. Quasi-experimental from experimental designs. (correct answer)
  3. Experimental from correlational designs.
  4. Case study from single-subject experimental designs.
Explanation: Selection threat, or non-equivalent groups, is the primary issue that differentiates quasi-experimental from experimental designs. In a true experiment, random assignment is used to create initially equivalent groups, thus minimizing selection threats. In quasi-experimental designs, pre-existing groups are used, so any observed differences at the end of the study could be due to the intervention or to the pre-existing differences between the groups.

Question 6

A developmental psychologist collects data from 500 families at a single point in time. The data include measures of parental discipline style, child temperament, and the child's current level of behavioral problems. The goal is to identify factors associated with behavioral problems. This study is best described as:

  1. a cross-sectional correlational design. (correct answer)
  2. a longitudinal experimental design.
  3. a quasi-experimental non-equivalent groups design.
  4. a multiple-baseline single-subject design.
Explanation: This study is correlational because it measures multiple variables and looks for relationships among them without any manipulation. It is cross-sectional because all data are collected at a single point in time. Distractor B is incorrect because the design is not longitudinal (over time) and lacks the manipulation required for an experiment. Distractor C is incorrect because there is no intervention or manipulated variable. Distractor D is an experimental design used with a single subject, which is inconsistent with the large sample size.

Question 7

A company wants to evaluate a new leadership training program. They offer the training to all managers at their Dallas office. They then compare the subsequent employee satisfaction scores from the Dallas office to the scores from their Boston office, where managers did not receive the training. This research design is best classified as:

  1. Experimental, because it involves a treatment group and a control group.
  2. Correlational, because leadership style and satisfaction are being associated.
  3. Quasi-experimental, because a treatment was administered to a non-randomly assigned group. (correct answer)
  4. Case study, because it focuses only on the specific outcomes within one company.
Explanation: This is a quasi-experimental design, specifically a non-equivalent control group design. An intervention (the leadership training) was implemented, but the participants (managers/offices) were not randomly assigned to the training and no-training conditions. The use of a comparison group (Boston office) strengthens the design over a one-group pre-post study, but the lack of random assignment prevents it from being a true experiment.

Question 8

A researcher obtains a large, publicly available dataset and uses it to examine the relationship between a county's average income level and its prevalence of diagnosed mood disorders. The study involves no direct contact with participants. This is an example of what type of design?

  1. An experimental archival design.
  2. A correlational archival design. (correct answer)
  3. A quasi-experimental archival design.
  4. A meta-analytic case study design.
Explanation: This study is correlational because it examines the relationship between two pre-existing variables (income, mood disorder prevalence) without any manipulation. The use of existing data makes it an archival study. Distractors A and C are incorrect because there is no manipulation of an independent variable. Distractor D is incorrect because meta-analysis involves combining the results of multiple previous studies, not analyzing raw data from a single source, and it is not a case study.

Question 9

A researcher is interested in whether the presence of a therapy dog can reduce anxiety during a public speaking task. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two conditions: giving a speech in front of an audience with a therapy dog present, or giving the same speech with no dog present. Their physiological arousal is measured. This is an example of which type of study?

  1. Experimental (correct answer)
  2. Quasi-experimental
  3. Correlational
  4. Case Study
Explanation: This study is a true experiment. The researcher is (1) manipulating an independent variable (the presence or absence of the therapy dog) and (2) randomly assigning participants to the conditions. These two features allow for the possibility of drawing causal conclusions about the effect of the dog on anxiety.

Question 10

A therapist has a client with a very rare and unclassified dissociative disorder. To better understand the client's experience and potentially inform future classification and treatment, the therapist documents the client's history, symptoms, and response to various therapeutic approaches in great detail over two years of therapy. This approach to research is best identified as a:

  1. longitudinal correlational study.
  2. single-subject experimental design.
  3. case study. (correct answer)
  4. quasi-experimental design.
Explanation: This is a case study. The defining characteristics are the in-depth, intensive focus on a single individual with a rare condition, with the goal of providing a rich, detailed description. While it is longitudinal (A), its primary classification is a case study due to the N of 1 and its descriptive, exploratory nature. It is not a single-subject experiment (B) because there is no systematic manipulation and withdrawal of a specific independent variable. It is not quasi-experimental (D) for the same reason.

Question 11

A study is designed to assess the effectiveness of a new online learning module. All employees in the marketing department are required to complete the module, while all employees in the sales department are not. The researcher compares the job performance metrics of the two departments for the three months following the module's implementation. What is the primary threat to the internal validity of this study's design?

  1. The lack of a manipulated independent variable, which makes the design correlational.
  2. The use of a single company, which limits the generalizability of a case study.
  3. The potential for pre-existing differences between the marketing and sales departments. (correct answer)
  4. The absence of random assignment to conditions, which is required for an experimental design.
Explanation: The study is a quasi-experimental, non-equivalent control group design. The primary threat to internal validity in such a design is the possibility that the groups were different to begin with. Any observed difference in job performance could be due to the online module or to these pre-existing differences between the marketing and sales departments (e.g., different job duties, different management, different baseline skills). Distractor D describes the feature of the design, while C describes the threat that results from that feature. Distractor A is incorrect because an IV was manipulated. Distractor B refers to external validity, not internal validity.

Question 12

A research team follows a group of 1,000 children from age 3 to age 18, collecting data every two years on their cognitive abilities, social skills, and family environment. The goal is to identify early-life predictors of adolescent well-being. No interventions are administered. This study's design is best described as:

  1. a longitudinal correlational design. (correct answer)
  2. a series of cross-sectional case studies.
  3. a quasi-experimental time-series design.
  4. a cohort-sequential experimental design.
Explanation: This is a longitudinal correlational design. It is 'longitudinal' because the same group of individuals is followed over a long period. It is 'correlational' because the researchers are measuring variables and looking for relationships (predictors) without manipulating any independent variables. Distractor C is incorrect because no intervention is being introduced. Distractors B and D are incorrect descriptions of the methodology.

Question 13

A researcher investigates the effectiveness of a new psychoeducational program for managing anxiety in college students. Two intact psychology classes are selected for the study. One class receives the new program, while the other receives a standard presentation on study skills. Anxiety levels are measured before and after the interventions. Which research design does this study represent?

  1. Experimental, because it includes a pretest-posttest design and a control group.
  2. Quasi-experimental, because the intervention groups were pre-existing and not formed by random assignment. (correct answer)
  3. Correlational, because it examines the relationship between class type and anxiety levels.
  4. Case study, because it focuses on the specific context of two particular classes.
Explanation: The key feature of this design is the manipulation of an independent variable (the type of program) without the random assignment of participants to conditions. Since the study uses 'intact' or pre-existing groups (the two classes), it is a quasi-experimental design. Distractor A is incorrect because the lack of random assignment prevents it from being a true experiment. Distractor C is incorrect because the researcher is actively implementing an intervention, not just measuring existing variables. Distractor D is incorrect because the study involves groups of participants, not an in-depth analysis of a single individual or unit.

Question 14

A study reports a strong positive association between the number of hours students spend at the library and their GPA. The researchers conclude that spending more time at the library leads to better grades. The primary limitation of this conclusion is that the study's design does not rule out alternative explanations (e.g., more conscientious students both study more and get better grades). What is the study's design?

  1. Experimental
  2. Quasi-experimental
  3. Correlational (correct answer)
  4. Case study
Explanation: The study described is correlational. It measures two variables (library hours and GPA) and finds an association. The inability to draw a causal conclusion and the presence of potential third-variable explanations are hallmark limitations of correlational research. An experimental design (A) could establish causality. A quasi-experimental design (B) would involve some intervention. A case study (D) would focus on an individual, not a general association in a group.

Question 15

A researcher is investigating the impact of chronic childhood illness on adult attachment style. Given the ethical and practical impossibility of assigning children to 'chronic illness' and 'healthy' groups, which study design is most appropriate for examining the relationship between these variables?

  1. Experimental, using a waitlist control group to create a comparison.
  2. Quasi-experimental, by implementing an intervention with chronically ill children.
  3. Correlational, by recruiting adults with and without histories of childhood illness and measuring their attachment styles. (correct answer)
  4. Case study, by exclusively focusing on one adult with a history of childhood illness.
Explanation: Since the independent variable (chronic childhood illness) cannot be manipulated or randomly assigned, an experimental design is impossible. A correlational (or ex post facto) design is most appropriate. The researcher would measure the pre-existing variables of illness history and adult attachment style to see if they are related. Distractor A is not feasible. Distractor B changes the research question to one about an intervention. Distractor D would provide in-depth information but would not be suitable for establishing a generalizable relationship between the two variables across a population.

Question 16

To study a new intervention for social anxiety, a researcher recruits 100 participants with a diagnosis of social anxiety disorder. The researcher uses a computer program to assign 50 participants to the new intervention group and 50 to a support group that serves as a control. The defining feature that makes this study a true experiment is the:

  1. presence of a control group for comparison.
  2. use of a computer program for assignment.
  3. recruitment of participants with a specific diagnosis.
  4. random assignment of participants to conditions. (correct answer)
Explanation: The single most critical feature that defines a true experiment and distinguishes it from a quasi-experiment is the random assignment of participants to the different conditions (in this case, intervention vs. control). While having a control group (A) is characteristic of many experiments, it can also exist in quasi-experimental designs. The method of assignment (B) is only important in that it achieves randomness. The specific population (C) defines the study's scope but not its design type.

Question 17

A researcher is hired by a city to evaluate the impact of installing new streetlights in a high-crime neighborhood. The researcher collects crime rate data for the neighborhood for 12 months before the installation and for 12 months after. To improve the study, the researcher also collects crime data from a similar neighborhood in the city that did not receive new streetlights. What type of design is this?

  1. A true experiment with a non-equivalent control group.
  2. A correlational study with a time-series component.
  3. A quasi-experimental interrupted time-series design. (correct answer)
  4. A case study focusing on two specific neighborhoods.
Explanation: This is a quasi-experimental design. Specifically, it is an interrupted time-series design with a non-equivalent control group. 'Time-series' refers to the multiple data points collected before and after the intervention. 'Interrupted' refers to the intervention itself (the streetlights). 'Quasi-experimental' applies because the 'treatment' was not randomly assigned to neighborhoods. Distractor A is contradictory; a true experiment cannot have a non-equivalent control group. Distractor B is incorrect because an intervention was implemented. Distractor D is less precise than C.

Question 18

A school district implements a new anti-bullying program in all of its middle schools. To assess its impact, a researcher compares the number of disciplinary incidents related to bullying for the year before the program's implementation and the year after. There is no comparison to schools outside the district. This study is best characterized as a:

  1. true experimental design.
  2. correlational cross-sectional study.
  3. quasi-experimental design. (correct answer)
  4. case study.
Explanation: This is a quasi-experimental design, specifically a one-group pretest-posttest design. An intervention (the anti-bullying program) was implemented, but there was no random assignment, and in this specific case, there isn't even a control group. This design is considered quasi-experimental because it involves a manipulated independent variable but lacks the rigorous controls (like random assignment and a control group) of a true experiment. It is not correlational because a program was actively implemented, and it's not a case study because it involves multiple schools/an entire district.

Question 19

A psychologist is interested in the relationship between pet ownership and life satisfaction among older adults. The psychologist surveys 300 residents of a retirement community, asking them whether they own a pet and having them complete a life satisfaction inventory. The results show that pet owners report significantly higher life satisfaction. What type of study design was used?

  1. Experimental, as it compares two distinct groups: pet owners and non-pet owners.
  2. Quasi-experimental, because pet ownership is a pre-existing condition that was not manipulated.
  3. Correlational, because the researcher measured two variables without manipulation or random assignment. (correct answer)
  4. Case study, because it focuses on a single, specific retirement community.
Explanation: This study is correlational because the researcher is measuring pre-existing variables (pet ownership and life satisfaction) and examining their relationship. There is no manipulation of an independent variable (the researcher did not assign pets to participants). Distractor A is incorrect because comparing groups does not automatically make a study experimental; random assignment and manipulation are required. Distractor B is incorrect because, while the groups are pre-existing, no intervention or treatment was applied or manipulated by the researcher. Distractor D is incorrect as the study involves a large sample (300 residents), not an in-depth look at a single case.

Question 20

A psychologist compares the cognitive flexibility of a group of professional musicians to a group of professional accountants. All participants are given a series of tasks measuring executive functions. The study finds that the musicians perform significantly better on tasks of cognitive flexibility. This research is an example of a:

  1. case study design, because it focuses on niche professional groups.
  2. experimental design, because it compares the performance of two groups.
  3. quasi-experimental design, because it involves an intervention (cognitive tasks).
  4. correlational design, because it examines the relationship between existing characteristics. (correct answer)
Explanation: This is a correlational study (specifically, a differential research or group comparison design). The researcher is comparing pre-existing groups based on an attribute (profession) that cannot be manipulated or assigned. No intervention is being implemented. The 'relationship' being examined is between the variable of 'profession' and the variable of 'cognitive flexibility'. It is not experimental (B) because there is no random assignment. It is not quasi-experimental (C) because the cognitive tasks are a dependent measure, not an intervention or manipulated variable.