All questions
Question 1
Which fraction is equivalent to 86?
- 42
- 46
- 64
- 43 (correct answer)
Explanation: Equivalent fractions represent the same amount, just written with different numbers. To find one, you divide (or multiply) both the numerator and denominator by the same number. Think of it as shrinking or growing the fraction proportionally.
Starting with 86, look for a number that divides evenly into both 6 and 8. Both are divisible by 2:
8÷26÷2=43
That matches choice D. You can also picture it: if you shade 6 out of 8 equal parts of a rectangle, the same shaded area covers 3 out of 4 larger parts.
Choice A, 42, simplifies to 21, which is smaller than 86 (86 is more than half since 6 is more than half of 8). Choice B, 46, is greater than 1, but 86 is less than 1, so they can't be equal. Choice C, 64, flips the idea — you can't just swap or subtract from the top and bottom. Dividing 4 and 6 by 2 gives 32, not 43.
A helpful tip: to check if two fractions are equivalent, try cross-multiplying. For 86 and 43: 6×4=24 and 8×3=24. Equal products mean equivalent fractions — a quick trick that works every time. Question 2
Tommy says that 32=64 because when you multiply the top and bottom of 32 by 2, you get 64. Using Tommy's method of multiplying both the top and bottom by the same number, which fraction is equivalent to 41?
- 81, because only the bottom number was multiplied by 2
- 62, because we add 1 to each part
- 164, because we multiply the top and bottom by 4 (correct answer)
- 95, because we add 4 to each part
Explanation: Tommy's method means multiplying both the top and bottom of a fraction by the same number to get an equivalent fraction. Multiplying the top and bottom of 1/4 by 4 gives 4/16, matching choice C. Choice A only multiplies the bottom number, which is not the method Tommy used and does not give an equivalent fraction. Choices B and D use addition instead of multiplication, which also does not follow Tommy's method.
Question 3
Emma says 82 and 41 are equivalent fractions. Which explanation best describes why Emma is correct?
- Both fractions have small numerators, so they must represent the same amount
- Dividing both the numerator and denominator of 82 by 2 gives 41, so the fractions are equal (correct answer)
- Both fractions have even numbers in them, which makes them equivalent to each other
- Multiplying both the numerator and denominator of 82 by 4 gives 41, so the fractions are equal
Explanation: Dividing both the numerator and denominator of 2/8 by 2 gives 1/4, so the two fractions represent the same amount, making B correct. Choice A is incorrect because having small numerators does not by itself make two fractions equal. Choice C is incorrect because having even numbers does not make fractions equivalent. Choice D is incorrect because multiplying 2/8 by 4 does not result in 1/4.
Question 4
Use the number lines to answer the question. Which fraction on the second number line is equivalent to 32?
- 62
- 63
- 64 (correct answer)
- 65
Explanation: The point at 32 on the top number line lines up with 64 on the sixths number line because each third equals 2 sixths. A copies the numerator, B is at 21, D is beyond 32. Question 5
Lisa wants to prove that 105 and 21 are equivalent fractions. She needs to show her work step by step. Which sequence of steps correctly proves these fractions are equivalent?
- Step 1: 105, Step 2: Divide top by 5, Step 3: 101, Step 4: Not equivalent
- Step 1: 105, Step 2: Multiply both by 2, Step 3: 2010, Step 4: Equivalent fractions
- Step 1: 105, Step 2: Add 5 to both parts, Step 3: 1510, Step 4: Equivalent fractions
- Step 1: 105, Step 2: Divide both by 5, Step 3: 21, Step 4: Equivalent fractions (correct answer)
Explanation: When you need to prove that two fractions are equivalent, you're looking for ways to show they represent the same amount. The key is finding a common factor that you can use to simplify one fraction into the other.
To prove 105 and 21 are equivalent, you need to simplify 105 by finding the greatest common factor of 5 and 10. Since both 5 and 10 can be divided by 5, you divide both the numerator and denominator by 5: 10÷55÷5=21. This shows the fractions are equivalent because they simplify to the same result.
Choice A only divides the top number by 5, leaving 101, which breaks the fraction rule - you must do the same operation to both parts. This gives an incorrect result.
Choice B multiplies both parts by 2 to get 2010. While 2010 is equivalent to both original fractions, this approach makes the fraction more complex instead of proving equivalence through simplification.
Choice C adds 5 to both parts, creating 1510. Adding the same number to numerator and denominator doesn't create equivalent fractions - this is a common misconception. 1510 actually equals 32, not 21.
Choice D correctly divides both the numerator and denominator by their greatest common factor of 5, simplifying 105 to 21 and proving equivalence.
Remember: To prove fraction equivalence, multiply or divide both parts by the same number - never add or subtract, and never change just one part. Question 6
Maria cut a pizza into 6 equal pieces and ate 2 pieces. Jake cut an identical pizza into 12 equal pieces. How many pieces must Jake eat to have the same amount of pizza as Maria?
- 3 pieces, because 62=123
- 4 pieces, because 62=124 (correct answer)
- 6 pieces, because Jake's pizza has twice as many pieces
- 2 pieces, because they both ate the same number of pieces
Explanation: To find equivalent fractions, we need to determine what fraction is equal to 2/6. Since Jake's pizza is cut into 12 pieces (double Maria's 6 pieces), we multiply both numerator and denominator by 2: 2/6 = (2×2)/(6×2) = 4/12. Therefore Jake must eat 4 pieces. Choice A incorrectly adds 1 to the numerator. Choice C confuses the total pieces with pieces eaten. Choice D ignores the different denominators.
Question 7
The number line shows a point at 42. Which fraction names the same point?
- 21 (correct answer)
- 22
- 41
- 24
Explanation: 42 is located halfway between 0 and 1, which is also the location of 21. B equals 1, C is only one-quarter of the way, and D equals 2. Question 8
Maya says that 32 is equivalent to 64. Which explanation best shows why she is correct?
- Both fractions have a 2 in them, so the fractions must be equal in value.
- When each third is split into 2 equal parts, you get 6 parts and 4 are shaded. (correct answer)
- The difference between the top number and bottom number is the same in each fraction.
- 4 is 2 more than 2, and 6 is 3 more than 3, so they match.
Explanation: Equivalent fractions represent the same amount of a whole, even though they use different numbers. The best way to prove two fractions are equivalent is to show how one can be created from the other by splitting the same whole into more (or fewer) equal pieces.
Start with 32: imagine a bar cut into 3 equal parts with 2 shaded. Now split each of those thirds into 2 equal pieces. The bar now has 3×2=6 equal parts, and the shaded region now contains 2×2=4 of those parts. The shaded amount didn't change — you just cut the pieces smaller. That's exactly what choice B describes, and it's the true reason 32=64.
Choice A is wrong because sharing a digit like "2" tells you nothing about a fraction's value — 92 and 52 both contain a 2 but aren't equal. Choice C uses a "difference" trick (3−2 = 1 and 6−4 = 2, so this isn't even true here), but subtracting the numerator from the denominator never determines equivalence. Choice D adds the same numbers to top and bottom, which changes a fraction's value; for example, 21 is not equal to 32 even though you added 1 to each.
Tip: To check equivalent fractions, ask "Was the whole cut into more equal pieces?" Multiplying (or dividing) the top and bottom by the same number works — adding does not. Question 9
David drew fraction strips to show that 124 and 31 are equivalent. Based on the fraction strips shown, why are these fractions equivalent?
- They are equivalent because 4 + 8 = 12 and 1 + 2 = 3, showing the same pattern
- They are equivalent because both strips show exactly the same length of shaded area (correct answer)
- They are equivalent because you multiply 1/3 by 4 to get 4/12
- They are equivalent because both fractions have the number 4 in them when you count carefully
Explanation: Fraction strips demonstrate equivalence by showing equal lengths of shaded portions. Even though 4/12 has 12 small sections with 4 shaded, and 1/3 has 3 large sections with 1 shaded, the total shaded lengths are identical. This visual proof shows the fractions represent the same amount. Choice A uses irrelevant addition. Choice C reflects a common error: multiplying 1/3 by 4 gives 4/3, not 4/12. Equivalent fractions are found by multiplying the numerator and denominator by the same factor (here, 4/4). Choice D makes an incorrect observation about the number 4.
Question 10
Look at the fraction models below. Which statement correctly explains why 43 and 86 are equivalent fractions?
- They are equivalent because 3 + 3 = 6 and 4 + 4 = 8, so we added the same amount
- They are equivalent because both fractions show exactly the same amount of area shaded (correct answer)
- They are equivalent because 6 is greater than 3 and 8 is greater than 4 by the same amount
- They are equivalent because both fractions have an even number in the denominator
Explanation: Equivalent fractions represent the same amount or portion of a whole. When we look at visual models, 3/4 and 6/8 show the same shaded area, proving they are equivalent. We can verify this by multiplying 3/4 by 2/2 to get 6/8. Choice A incorrectly suggests addition creates equivalent fractions. Choice C focuses on differences rather than ratios. Choice D mentions irrelevant properties of the denominators.
Question 11
Which fraction is equivalent to 42?
- 82
- 44
- 41
- 21 (correct answer)
Explanation: Dividing both the numerator and denominator of 2/4 by 2 gives 1/2, so choice D is correct. Choice A comes from doubling the denominator instead of finding an equivalent fraction. Choice B mixes up the numerator and denominator. Choice C uses only part of the original fraction.
Question 12
Refer to the two circles. Devon says the shaded parts show that 21=42. Which statement best supports his claim?
- Both circles are divided into the same number of pieces.
- The circles are the same size and the shaded regions cover the same amount. (correct answer)
- Both fractions have a 2 in them.
- The second circle has more shaded pieces, so it must be bigger.
Explanation: Two fractions are equivalent when they represent the same amount of the same-sized whole. B is the key reasoning. A is false (2 pieces vs. 4). C is not mathematical reasoning. D is a misconception — more pieces do not mean more area shaded.
Question 13
Alex needs to find a fraction equivalent to 53 that has a denominator of 15. What must Alex do to find this equivalent fraction?
- Multiply both the numerator and denominator by 3 (correct answer)
- Add 10 to both the numerator and denominator
- Multiply only the numerator by 5, keeping the denominator the same
- Divide both the numerator and denominator by 3
Explanation: To find an equivalent fraction with a denominator of 15, multiply both the numerator and denominator of 3/5 by 3, since 5 times 3 equals 15. This gives 9/15, so A is correct. Choice B does not keep the fraction equivalent, since adding the same number to numerator and denominator changes the value. Choice C only changes the numerator, which also changes the value of the fraction. Choice D divides instead of multiplying, which would not produce a denominator of 15.
Question 14
Jamal ate 43 of a small pizza. His sister ate the same amount of a pizza that was cut into 8 equal slices. How many slices did his sister eat?
- 3 slices
- 4 slices
- 6 slices (correct answer)
- 8 slices
Explanation: This question is all about equivalent fractions — the idea that the same amount of something can be written with different numbers depending on how many pieces it's cut into. Whenever a problem tells you two people ate "the same amount" but from pizzas cut differently, your job is to rename the fraction so it matches the new number of slices.
Jamal ate 43 of his pizza. His sister's pizza is cut into 8 slices, so you need a fraction with 8 on the bottom that equals 43. Since 4×2=8, multiply the top by 2 as well: 4×23×2=86. That means she ate 6 slices, which is choice C.
Choice A (3 slices) is a trap for students who just copy the numerator from 43 without adjusting for the new-sized slices — but 3 out of 8 is less than half a pizza, not the same as 43. Choice B (4 slices) is exactly half the pizza (84=21), which is less than 43. Choice D (8 slices) would be the whole pizza, way more than 43.
Study tip: To find an equivalent fraction, whatever you multiply the bottom number by, multiply the top number by the same thing. A quick check: 43 is a little more than half, so your answer should also be a little more than half of 8 — and 6 fits perfectly. Question 15
Which set of fractions are ALL equivalent to 21?
- 42, 63, 84 (correct answer)
- 32, 43, 64
- 31, 42, 63
- 42, 62, 82
Explanation: Equivalent fractions name the same amount using different numbers. To check if a fraction equals 21, ask yourself: "Is the bottom number (denominator) exactly double the top number (numerator)?" If yes, it's equivalent to one-half.
Look at choice A: In 42, 4 is double 2. ✓ In 63, 6 is double 3. ✓ In 84, 8 is double 4. ✓ All three fractions represent exactly half of a whole, so A is correct. You can also see this by multiplying 21 by 22, 33, and 44 — you get exactly those three fractions.
Choice B is wrong because 32 and 43 are both greater than one-half (the denominators aren't double the numerators), and 64 equals 32, not 21.
Choice C traps students who don't check every fraction. While 42 and 63 do equal 21, 31 does not — it's less than one-half.
Choice D also mixes things up: only 42 equals 21. In 62 and 82, the denominators are more than double the numerators, so those fractions are smaller than one-half.
Tip: For any fraction equivalent to 21, the denominator must be exactly twice the numerator. And always check every fraction in the set — one wrong fraction eliminates the whole answer choice! Question 16
A pan of cornbread is cut into 8 equal pieces. Ben eats 2 pieces. Which fraction is equivalent to the part he ate?
- 41 (correct answer)
- 21
- 42
- 61
Explanation: When you see a fraction question about equal parts of a whole, remember that equivalent fractions name the same amount using different numbers. You can find them by multiplying or dividing both the top (numerator) and bottom (denominator) by the same number.
Ben ate 2 out of 8 pieces, which is 82. To simplify, divide both the numerator and denominator by 2:
8÷22÷2=41
So 82 and 41 represent the same amount of cornbread, making A correct.
Now let's look at why the others don't work. B (21) would mean Ben ate 4 out of 8 pieces — that's half the pan, way more than he actually ate. C (42) also equals 21 (divide top and bottom by 2), so it's the same as B — too much. D (61) uses a denominator of 6, but the pan wasn't cut into 6 pieces, and 61 isn't equal to 82 anyway.
A helpful strategy: when checking if two fractions are equivalent, try to simplify the bigger one or multiply the smaller one up. If 41 is equivalent to 82, multiplying both parts of 41 by 2 should give you 82 — and it does! This "multiply to check" trick works every time. Question 17
Lily wrote: 31=6?. What number makes the fractions equivalent?
- 1
- 2 (correct answer)
- 3
- 6
Explanation: Equivalent fractions represent the same amount, just written with different numbers. To find them, you multiply (or divide) both the top number (numerator) and the bottom number (denominator) by the same value. Whatever you do to one part, you must do to the other — that's the golden rule of equivalent fractions.
Look at the denominators: 3 became 6. Ask yourself, "What did I multiply 3 by to get 6?" The answer is 2, because 3×2=6. Now apply that same operation to the numerator: 1×2=2. So 31=62, making B correct.
Choice A (1) is wrong because it keeps the numerator the same while the denominator doubled — that would change the value of the fraction, not preserve it. Choice C (3) is a trap that comes from adding 2 to the top (since 2 was added to the bottom: 3+2=5... wait, actually students often just copy the original denominator). Either way, 63 equals 21, not 31. Choice D (6) matches the new denominator, giving 66=1 whole, which is much bigger than 31.
A helpful trick: whenever you see an equivalent fraction problem, find the "multiplier" between the two parts you can see (here, the denominators), then use that same multiplier on the missing part. Never add or subtract to make equivalent fractions — always multiply or divide. Question 18
A brownie pan began with 4 equal-sized brownies. Emma ate 42. What is another name for the fraction that Emma ate?
- 1/2 (correct answer)
- 3/4
- 2/8
- 2/3
Explanation: 1/2 is correct because 2/4 simplifies to 1/2. 3/4 is incorrect; it's a different fraction than 2/4. 2/8 is incorrect because it's not equivalent to 2/4, since it represents a smaller amount. 2/3 is incorrect; it doesn't equal 2/4 in value. Question 19
Which fraction is equivalent to 64?
- 42
- 32 (correct answer)
- 43
- 84
Explanation: Equivalent fractions represent the same amount, just written with different numbers. To find one, you either multiply or divide the top (numerator) and bottom (denominator) by the same number. Think of it as simplifying: if both numbers share a common factor, you can shrink the fraction to a simpler form that still equals the same value.
Look at 64. Both 4 and 6 can be divided by 2. So 6÷24÷2=32. That makes B the equivalent fraction.
Now consider the wrong choices. A) 42 simplifies to 21, which is smaller than 64 — imagine half a pizza versus four out of six slices; the six-slice version is more. C) 43 is larger than 64 (which equals about 32), so it can't be equivalent. D) 84 also simplifies to 21, the same trap as A — the numerator matches 4, which might tempt you, but the value is smaller.
A helpful tip: whenever you're asked for an equivalent fraction, try simplifying the given fraction first by dividing the top and bottom by the same number. Then match your simplified version to the answer choices. And remember — just because two fractions share a number (like the 4 in 64 and 84) doesn't mean they're equal! Question 20
Which pair of fractions is NOT equivalent?
- 21 and 63
- 42 and 84
- 31 and 62
- 32 and 43 (correct answer)
Explanation: Equivalent fractions represent the same amount, even though they use different numbers. The quickest way to check if two fractions are equivalent is to see whether you can multiply (or divide) the numerator and denominator of one fraction by the same number to get the other. Another reliable test: cross-multiply. If the products match, the fractions are equivalent.
Look at D: 32 and 43. Cross-multiplying gives 2×4=8 and 3×3=9. Since 8=9, these fractions are not equal. You can also see there's no single whole number you can multiply 2 and 3 by to get 3 and 4, so they can't be equivalent.
Choice A works because multiplying 21 by 33 gives 63 — same value, just cut into more pieces. Choice B works because 42 times 22 equals 84 (both also simplify to 21). Choice C works because 31 times 22 equals 62.
So D is the pair that is NOT equivalent.
A helpful strategy: when a question asks which pair is NOT equivalent, quickly simplify each fraction to its lowest terms. If both fractions in a pair simplify to the same thing, they're equivalent. Also, watch out for questions with the word "NOT" — it's easy to pick an equivalent pair by mistake, so underline "NOT" before you begin.