Earth Science Quiz: Climate Feedbacks
20 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Climate FeedbacksQuestion 1 of 20

If all anthropogenic CO₂ emissions were to cease today, the Earth would continue to warm for some time due to thermal inertia. How would the water vapor feedback operate during this period of continued warming?

It would become a negative feedback, drawing down atmospheric heat and stabilizing the climate.
It would cease to operate because the primary forcing (CO₂ emissions) has been removed.
It would continue to act as a positive feedback, amplifying the committed warming caused by past emissions.
It would be overtaken by the ice-albedo feedback as the dominant factor in ongoing temperature change.
← Back to quizzes

Earth Science Quiz

Earth Science Quiz: Climate Feedbacks

Practice Climate Feedbacks in Earth Science with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Climate Feedbacks, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Earth Science.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

If all anthropogenic CO₂ emissions were to cease today, the Earth would continue to warm for some time due to thermal inertia. How would the water vapor feedback operate during this period of continued warming?

  1. It would become a negative feedback, drawing down atmospheric heat and stabilizing the climate.
  2. It would cease to operate because the primary forcing (CO₂ emissions) has been removed.
  3. It would continue to act as a positive feedback, amplifying the committed warming caused by past emissions. (correct answer)
  4. It would be overtaken by the ice-albedo feedback as the dominant factor in ongoing temperature change.

Explanation: The water vapor feedback responds to temperature, not directly to the concentration of CO₂. Even after CO₂ emissions stop, the elevated concentration of existing CO₂ and the slow release of heat from the oceans (thermal inertia) mean that global temperatures would continue to rise for some time. As long as temperatures are rising, the water vapor feedback will continue to operate in a positive manner: warmer air will hold more water vapor, which will enhance the greenhouse effect and amplify the ongoing warming.

Question 2

An analysis of an ice core shows that during a past deglaciation, temperatures in Antarctica began to rise before atmospheric CO₂ concentrations did. A skeptic argues this proves CO₂ doesn't cause warming. Which climate feedback provides the most direct explanation for why temperature can rise before CO₂ in this specific context?

  1. The water vapor feedback, as increased humidity from warmer oceans initiated a runaway greenhouse effect.
  2. The CO₂ is a forcing, not a feedback, so its timing relative to temperature is irrelevant to the overall warming.
  3. This observation is incorrect; CO₂ must always rise before temperature for it to be considered a greenhouse gas.
  4. The ice-albedo feedback, as orbital changes warmed the Northern Hemisphere, melting ice sheets and raising global temperatures and CO₂. (correct answer)

Explanation: When you encounter questions about ice core data and climate timing, remember that Earth's climate system involves complex interactions between forcings (external drivers) and feedbacks (internal responses that amplify or dampen changes). The key insight here is understanding how orbital cycles trigger deglaciation. Orbital changes (Milankovitch cycles) alter the distribution of solar energy reaching Earth's surface. During deglaciation periods, these changes typically increase summer heating in the Northern Hemisphere, where most ice sheets are located. This initial orbital forcing begins melting ice sheets, which triggers the ice-albedo feedback: as bright, reflective ice melts, it exposes darker land and ocean surfaces that absorb more heat, causing further warming. This warming then releases CO₂ from warming oceans and thawing permafrost, creating additional greenhouse warming. So temperature rises first from orbital forcing, then CO₂ rises as a feedback, amplifying the warming globally. Answer D correctly identifies this sequence: orbital changes warm the Northern Hemisphere, ice-albedo feedback amplifies warming globally, and this releases CO₂ that sustains the warming. Answer A incorrectly focuses on water vapor, which isn't the primary driver of initial deglaciation warming. Answer B misses the point entirely—the timing does matter for understanding cause-and-effect relationships. Answer C is factually wrong; CO₂ can act as both a forcing and feedback depending on the context. Remember: In paleoclimate questions, distinguish between initial forcings (like orbital cycles) and subsequent feedbacks (like ice-albedo and CO₂ release) that amplify the original signal.

Question 3

In a simplified climate model, a sustained 1 W/m² increase in solar forcing causes a 0.25°C equilibrium temperature increase. When the model is re-run with a dynamic atmosphere that includes the water vapor feedback, the same forcing causes a 0.6°C increase. Based on this, what can be concluded about the water vapor feedback in this model?

  1. It is a negative feedback that adds 0.35°C of cooling to the system.
  2. It is a positive feedback that more than doubles the initial temperature response. (correct answer)
  3. It is a forcing agent with a magnitude of 0.35 W/m².
  4. It accounts for exactly 58% of the total greenhouse effect in the model.

Explanation: The initial warming without feedback is 0.25°C. The total warming with the feedback is 0.6°C. The feedback, therefore, caused an additional 0.6°C - 0.25°C = 0.35°C of warming. The total warming (0.6°C) is more than double the initial warming (0.25°C). Since the feedback increased the warming, it is a positive feedback. This directly supports option B. Option A incorrectly identifies it as negative. Option C misclassifies the feedback as a forcing. Option D makes an unsubstantiated claim about the total greenhouse effect; the model results only speak to the response to a change.

Question 4

A major volcanic eruption injects a large volume of sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere, causing a short-term global cooling of 0.5°C. How will the Earth's water vapor feedback respond to this initial temperature change?

  1. It will act as a positive feedback, as cooler air holds less water vapor, reducing the greenhouse effect and amplifying the cooling. (correct answer)
  2. It will act as a negative feedback, as increased condensation will form clouds that trap heat, counteracting the cooling.
  3. It will be negligible, as the stratospheric aerosols will not directly interact with tropospheric water vapor where the greenhouse effect is strongest.
  4. It will act as a positive feedback by increasing evaporation from the oceans to balance the atmospheric cooling, leading to warming.

Explanation: The water vapor feedback is a positive feedback, meaning it amplifies the initial temperature change, regardless of direction. The initial cooling from the aerosols will reduce the atmosphere's capacity to hold water vapor (due to the Clausius-Clapeyron relation). Less water vapor, a potent greenhouse gas, will lead to a weaker greenhouse effect, causing further cooling. Thus, the feedback amplifies the initial cooling. Distractor B incorrectly identifies the feedback as negative and focuses on clouds, not vapor. Distractor C incorrectly assumes no connection between surface temperature and water vapor. Distractor D incorrectly describes the feedback's mechanism and direction.

Question 5

Climate models project that a doubling of atmospheric CO₂, without any feedbacks, would cause about 1.2°C of warming. However, with feedbacks included, the projected warming is typically 2.5°C to 4.5°C. Which statement provides the most accurate explanation for this difference?

  1. The ice-albedo feedback is a negative feedback that reduces the initial warming from CO₂, while the water vapor feedback is a stronger positive feedback.
  2. The water vapor feedback acts as the primary positive feedback, amplifying the initial warming, with the ice-albedo feedback providing additional amplification. (correct answer)
  3. The initial 1.2°C of warming is absorbed by the ocean, and the additional warming is due to the slow release of this heat back into the atmosphere.
  4. The models assume that negative feedbacks, such as cloud formation, are weaker than the initial warming effect caused by CO₂.

Explanation: The significant difference between warming without feedbacks (climate sensitivity) and with feedbacks (Earth system sensitivity) is due to net positive feedbacks. The water vapor feedback is the strongest and most important of these. As the planet warms from the initial CO₂ forcing, the atmosphere can hold more water vapor, which is a greenhouse gas, leading to further warming. The ice-albedo feedback also contributes to amplification but is generally considered less strong than the water vapor feedback. Distractor A incorrectly states that ice-albedo is a negative feedback. Distractor C describes ocean heat uptake, which affects the timing of warming but isn't a feedback in this context. Distractor D focuses only on negative feedbacks and doesn't explain the large amplification.

Question 6

Which of the following scenarios provides the clearest example of the ice-albedo feedback amplifying a cooling trend?

  1. A warming climate causes permafrost to thaw, releasing methane, which leads to further warming and more permafrost thaw.
  2. A decrease in solar radiation causes global temperatures to drop, leading to the expansion of continental ice sheets and a further drop in temperature. (correct answer)
  3. Increased snowfall on a glacier causes its mass to increase, but the surface remains white, keeping the local albedo constant.
  4. Soot and dust from industrial sources settle on Arctic snow, causing the surface to absorb more sunlight and melt faster.

Explanation: A positive feedback amplifies an initial change. In a cooling scenario, the ice-albedo feedback works as follows: initial cooling allows for the expansion of ice and snow cover. This highly reflective surface increases Earth's overall albedo, causing more solar radiation to be reflected back to space, which leads to further cooling. This matches scenario B. Scenario A describes the permafrost-carbon feedback, not ice-albedo. Scenario C describes a situation with no feedback, as albedo does not change. Scenario D describes a forcing (deposition of soot) that decreases albedo and causes warming, which is the opposite of amplifying a cooling trend.

Question 7

A geoengineering proposal suggests deploying millions of small, reflective particles in the Arctic Ocean during summer to simulate the effect of sea ice. The primary goal of this strategy is to directly manipulate which component of the climate system?

  1. The Clausius-Clapeyron relation to reduce atmospheric water vapor.
  2. The ocean's thermohaline circulation by cooling surface waters.
  3. The regional surface albedo to weaken a positive feedback loop. (correct answer)
  4. The atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases.

Explanation: The loss of reflective sea ice in the Arctic and its replacement by dark, absorbent ocean water is the key mechanism of the ice-albedo feedback. This feedback amplifies regional and global warming. By deploying reflective particles, the strategy aims to artificially increase the albedo of the ocean surface, mimicking the lost ice. This would cause more sunlight to be reflected, directly counteracting or weakening the ice-albedo positive feedback loop. The other options describe different parts of the climate system that are not the direct target of an albedo modification strategy.

Question 8

Consider a hypothetical scenario where an initial warming of 1°C melts a large area of sea ice. The newly exposed dark ocean water absorbs more sunlight, causing an additional 0.3°C of warming. This additional warming increases evaporation, leading to more atmospheric water vapor and another 0.6°C of warming. What is the net effect of these two feedbacks?

  1. A positive feedback of 0.9°C, resulting in a total warming of 1.9°C. (correct answer)
  2. A positive feedback of 1.9°C, resulting in a total warming of 2.9°C.
  3. Two separate feedbacks of 0.3°C and 0.6°C that do not interact with each other.
  4. A negative feedback of 0.9°C as the system attempts to restore equilibrium.

Explanation: This question requires summing the effects of the feedbacks. The initial forcing caused 1°C of warming. The ice-albedo feedback added 0.3°C. The water vapor feedback added 0.6°C. The total amplification from these feedbacks is the sum of their individual contributions: 0.3°C + 0.6°C = 0.9°C. The total warming is the initial warming plus the feedback amplification: 1.0°C + 0.9°C = 1.9°C. The net effect of the feedbacks is the 0.9°C of additional warming. They are both positive feedbacks as they amplify the initial change.

Question 9

If all anthropogenic CO₂ emissions were to cease today, the Earth would continue to warm for some time due to thermal inertia. How would the water vapor feedback operate during this period of continued warming?

  1. It would become a negative feedback, drawing down atmospheric heat and stabilizing the climate.
  2. It would cease to operate because the primary forcing (CO₂ emissions) has been removed.
  3. It would continue to act as a positive feedback, amplifying the committed warming caused by past emissions. (correct answer)
  4. It would be overtaken by the ice-albedo feedback as the dominant factor in ongoing temperature change.

Explanation: The water vapor feedback responds to temperature, not directly to the concentration of CO₂. Even after CO₂ emissions stop, the elevated concentration of existing CO₂ and the slow release of heat from the oceans (thermal inertia) mean that global temperatures would continue to rise for some time. As long as temperatures are rising, the water vapor feedback will continue to operate in a positive manner: warmer air will hold more water vapor, which will enhance the greenhouse effect and amplify the ongoing warming.

Question 10

Polar amplification describes the phenomenon where changes in the net radiation balance tend to produce a larger change in temperature near the poles than the planetary average. The ice-albedo feedback is a major contributor to this effect. How does it specifically enhance warming in polar regions?

  1. By increasing the amount of water vapor the cold polar atmosphere can hold, enhancing the local greenhouse effect.
  2. By altering ocean currents to transport more heat from the tropics to the polar regions.
  3. By releasing large quantities of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, from beneath the melting ice.
  4. By replacing highly reflective ice and snow with a dark, energy-absorbing ocean surface. (correct answer)

Explanation: When you encounter questions about polar amplification, focus on feedback mechanisms that specifically amplify temperature changes in polar regions compared to global averages. The ice-albedo feedback is one of the most powerful positive feedback loops in Earth's climate system. The ice-albedo feedback works through surface reflectivity changes. Ice and snow have very high albedo (reflectivity), bouncing 80-90% of incoming solar radiation back to space. When warming causes ice to melt, it exposes darker ocean water or land surfaces with much lower albedo (10-20% reflectivity). These dark surfaces absorb far more solar energy, warming the region further and melting even more ice. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle that amplifies the original warming signal. Looking at the wrong answers: Choice A confuses polar amplification with the water vapor feedback, which is actually weaker in cold polar regions where the atmosphere holds less moisture. Choice B describes heat transport changes, which can affect polar temperatures but isn't the ice-albedo feedback mechanism specifically asked about. Choice C refers to methane release from permafrost or hydrates, which is a separate positive feedback but not the ice-albedo effect. Choice D correctly identifies the core mechanism: replacing highly reflective ice and snow with dark, energy-absorbing ocean surfaces that dramatically increase local heat absorption. Remember that positive climate feedbacks amplify initial changes rather than moderate them. When studying polar amplification, focus on albedo changes as the primary mechanism, and distinguish it from other feedbacks like water vapor or methane release that may also occur in polar regions.

Question 11

A major volcanic eruption injects a large volume of sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere, causing a short-term global cooling of 0.5°C. How will the Earth's water vapor feedback respond to this initial temperature change?

  1. It will act as a positive feedback, as cooler air holds less water vapor, reducing the greenhouse effect and amplifying the cooling. (correct answer)
  2. It will act as a negative feedback, as increased condensation will form clouds that trap heat, counteracting the cooling.
  3. It will be negligible, as the stratospheric aerosols will not directly interact with tropospheric water vapor where the greenhouse effect is strongest.
  4. It will act as a positive feedback by increasing evaporation from the oceans to balance the atmospheric cooling, leading to warming.

Explanation: The water vapor feedback is a positive feedback, meaning it amplifies the initial temperature change, regardless of direction. The initial cooling from the aerosols will reduce the atmosphere's capacity to hold water vapor (due to the Clausius-Clapeyron relation). Less water vapor, a potent greenhouse gas, will lead to a weaker greenhouse effect, causing further cooling. Thus, the feedback amplifies the initial cooling. Distractor B incorrectly identifies the feedback as negative and focuses on clouds, not vapor. Distractor C incorrectly assumes no connection between surface temperature and water vapor. Distractor D incorrectly describes the feedback's mechanism and direction.

Question 12

Climate models project that a doubling of atmospheric CO₂, without any feedbacks, would cause about 1.2°C of warming. However, with feedbacks included, the projected warming is typically 2.5°C to 4.5°C. Which statement provides the most accurate explanation for this difference?

  1. The ice-albedo feedback is a negative feedback that reduces the initial warming from CO₂, while the water vapor feedback is a stronger positive feedback.
  2. The water vapor feedback acts as the primary positive feedback, amplifying the initial warming, with the ice-albedo feedback providing additional amplification. (correct answer)
  3. The initial 1.2°C of warming is absorbed by the ocean, and the additional warming is due to the slow release of this heat back into the atmosphere.
  4. The models assume that negative feedbacks, such as cloud formation, are weaker than the initial warming effect caused by CO₂.

Explanation: The significant difference between warming without feedbacks (climate sensitivity) and with feedbacks (Earth system sensitivity) is due to net positive feedbacks. The water vapor feedback is the strongest and most important of these. As the planet warms from the initial CO₂ forcing, the atmosphere can hold more water vapor, which is a greenhouse gas, leading to further warming. The ice-albedo feedback also contributes to amplification but is generally considered less strong than the water vapor feedback. Distractor A incorrectly states that ice-albedo is a negative feedback. Distractor C describes ocean heat uptake, which affects the timing of warming but isn't a feedback in this context. Distractor D focuses only on negative feedbacks and doesn't explain the large amplification.

Question 13

Consider a hypothetical scenario where an initial warming of 1°C melts a large area of sea ice. The newly exposed dark ocean water absorbs more sunlight, causing an additional 0.3°C of warming. This additional warming increases evaporation, leading to more atmospheric water vapor and another 0.6°C of warming. What is the net effect of these two feedbacks?

  1. A positive feedback of 0.9°C, resulting in a total warming of 1.9°C. (correct answer)
  2. A positive feedback of 1.9°C, resulting in a total warming of 2.9°C.
  3. Two separate feedbacks of 0.3°C and 0.6°C that do not interact with each other.
  4. A negative feedback of 0.9°C as the system attempts to restore equilibrium.

Explanation: This question requires summing the effects of the feedbacks. The initial forcing caused 1°C of warming. The ice-albedo feedback added 0.3°C. The water vapor feedback added 0.6°C. The total amplification from these feedbacks is the sum of their individual contributions: 0.3°C + 0.6°C = 0.9°C. The total warming is the initial warming plus the feedback amplification: 1.0°C + 0.9°C = 1.9°C. The net effect of the feedbacks is the 0.9°C of additional warming. They are both positive feedbacks as they amplify the initial change.

Question 14

In a simplified climate model, a sustained 1 W/m² increase in solar forcing causes a 0.25°C equilibrium temperature increase. When the model is re-run with a dynamic atmosphere that includes the water vapor feedback, the same forcing causes a 0.6°C increase. Based on this, what can be concluded about the water vapor feedback in this model?

  1. It is a negative feedback that adds 0.35°C of cooling to the system.
  2. It is a positive feedback that more than doubles the initial temperature response. (correct answer)
  3. It is a forcing agent with a magnitude of 0.35 W/m².
  4. It accounts for exactly 58% of the total greenhouse effect in the model.

Explanation: The initial warming without feedback is 0.25°C. The total warming with the feedback is 0.6°C. The feedback, therefore, caused an additional 0.6°C - 0.25°C = 0.35°C of warming. The total warming (0.6°C) is more than double the initial warming (0.25°C). Since the feedback increased the warming, it is a positive feedback. This directly supports option B. Option A incorrectly identifies it as negative. Option C misclassifies the feedback as a forcing. Option D makes an unsubstantiated claim about the total greenhouse effect; the model results only speak to the response to a change.

Question 15

An analysis of an ice core shows that during a past deglaciation, temperatures in Antarctica began to rise before atmospheric CO₂ concentrations did. A skeptic argues this proves CO₂ doesn't cause warming. Which climate feedback provides the most direct explanation for why temperature can rise before CO₂ in this specific context?

  1. The water vapor feedback, as increased humidity from warmer oceans initiated a runaway greenhouse effect.
  2. The CO₂ is a forcing, not a feedback, so its timing relative to temperature is irrelevant to the overall warming.
  3. This observation is incorrect; CO₂ must always rise before temperature for it to be considered a greenhouse gas.
  4. The ice-albedo feedback, as orbital changes warmed the Northern Hemisphere, melting ice sheets and raising global temperatures and CO₂. (correct answer)

Explanation: When you encounter questions about ice core data and climate timing, remember that Earth's climate system involves complex interactions between forcings (external drivers) and feedbacks (internal responses that amplify or dampen changes). The key insight here is understanding how orbital cycles trigger deglaciation. Orbital changes (Milankovitch cycles) alter the distribution of solar energy reaching Earth's surface. During deglaciation periods, these changes typically increase summer heating in the Northern Hemisphere, where most ice sheets are located. This initial orbital forcing begins melting ice sheets, which triggers the ice-albedo feedback: as bright, reflective ice melts, it exposes darker land and ocean surfaces that absorb more heat, causing further warming. This warming then releases CO₂ from warming oceans and thawing permafrost, creating additional greenhouse warming. So temperature rises first from orbital forcing, then CO₂ rises as a feedback, amplifying the warming globally. Answer D correctly identifies this sequence: orbital changes warm the Northern Hemisphere, ice-albedo feedback amplifies warming globally, and this releases CO₂ that sustains the warming. Answer A incorrectly focuses on water vapor, which isn't the primary driver of initial deglaciation warming. Answer B misses the point entirely—the timing does matter for understanding cause-and-effect relationships. Answer C is factually wrong; CO₂ can act as both a forcing and feedback depending on the context. Remember: In paleoclimate questions, distinguish between initial forcings (like orbital cycles) and subsequent feedbacks (like ice-albedo and CO₂ release) that amplify the original signal.

Question 16

Polar amplification describes the phenomenon where changes in the net radiation balance tend to produce a larger change in temperature near the poles than the planetary average. The ice-albedo feedback is a major contributor to this effect. How does it specifically enhance warming in polar regions?

  1. By increasing the amount of water vapor the cold polar atmosphere can hold, enhancing the local greenhouse effect.
  2. By altering ocean currents to transport more heat from the tropics to the polar regions.
  3. By releasing large quantities of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, from beneath the melting ice.
  4. By replacing highly reflective ice and snow with a dark, energy-absorbing ocean surface. (correct answer)

Explanation: When you encounter questions about polar amplification, focus on feedback mechanisms that specifically amplify temperature changes in polar regions compared to global averages. The ice-albedo feedback is one of the most powerful positive feedback loops in Earth's climate system. The ice-albedo feedback works through surface reflectivity changes. Ice and snow have very high albedo (reflectivity), bouncing 80-90% of incoming solar radiation back to space. When warming causes ice to melt, it exposes darker ocean water or land surfaces with much lower albedo (10-20% reflectivity). These dark surfaces absorb far more solar energy, warming the region further and melting even more ice. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle that amplifies the original warming signal. Looking at the wrong answers: Choice A confuses polar amplification with the water vapor feedback, which is actually weaker in cold polar regions where the atmosphere holds less moisture. Choice B describes heat transport changes, which can affect polar temperatures but isn't the ice-albedo feedback mechanism specifically asked about. Choice C refers to methane release from permafrost or hydrates, which is a separate positive feedback but not the ice-albedo effect. Choice D correctly identifies the core mechanism: replacing highly reflective ice and snow with dark, energy-absorbing ocean surfaces that dramatically increase local heat absorption. Remember that positive climate feedbacks amplify initial changes rather than moderate them. When studying polar amplification, focus on albedo changes as the primary mechanism, and distinguish it from other feedbacks like water vapor or methane release that may also occur in polar regions.

Question 17

A common misconception is that because water vapor is the most abundant greenhouse gas, climate change mitigation should focus on directly reducing its atmospheric concentration. Why is this approach fundamentally flawed from a climate science perspective?

  1. Water vapor has a very short atmospheric residence time and its concentration is a function of temperature, making it a feedback, not a long-term forcing agent. (correct answer)
  2. Anthropogenic emissions of water vapor from sources like power plant cooling towers are globally insignificant compared to natural evaporation.
  3. Reducing water vapor would have severe negative impacts on weather patterns and the hydrological cycle, making it an impractical strategy.
  4. CO₂ is a much more potent greenhouse gas on a per-molecule basis, so it is the more logical target for mitigation efforts.

Explanation: The core reason this idea is flawed relates to the distinction between a forcing and a feedback. Long-lived greenhouse gases like CO₂, CH₄, and N₂O act as forcings because they remain in the atmosphere for decades to centuries, accumulating and driving temperature changes. Water vapor, in contrast, has a residence time of about 9 days. Its concentration in the atmosphere is primarily controlled by temperature; if you were to magically remove half the water vapor, it would be replenished by evaporation within a week or two. Because it responds to temperature changes rather than driving them over the long term, it is considered a feedback.

Question 18

Why is the ice-albedo feedback considered a 'positive' feedback, even when it contributes to global cooling during the onset of an ice age?

  1. Because the overall long-term trend of Earth's climate is toward warming, making any cooling effect temporary.
  2. Because 'positive' refers to the addition of ice cover, which is a positive change in mass for the cryosphere.
  3. Because the feedback mechanism reinforces and amplifies the initial temperature change, regardless of its direction. (correct answer)
  4. Because it counteracts the negative feedback from water vapor, resulting in a net positive effect on temperature change.

Explanation: In climate science, the terms 'positive' and 'negative' for feedbacks do not mean 'good' and 'bad' or 'warming' and 'cooling'. A positive feedback is one that amplifies an initial perturbation. A negative feedback is one that dampens it. The ice-albedo feedback amplifies warming (less ice -> less reflection -> more warming) and it also amplifies cooling (more ice -> more reflection -> more cooling). Because it always reinforces the initial change, it is classified as a positive feedback.

Question 19

A geoengineering proposal suggests deploying millions of small, reflective particles in the Arctic Ocean during summer to simulate the effect of sea ice. The primary goal of this strategy is to directly manipulate which component of the climate system?

  1. The Clausius-Clapeyron relation to reduce atmospheric water vapor.
  2. The ocean's thermohaline circulation by cooling surface waters.
  3. The regional surface albedo to weaken a positive feedback loop. (correct answer)
  4. The atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases.

Explanation: The loss of reflective sea ice in the Arctic and its replacement by dark, absorbent ocean water is the key mechanism of the ice-albedo feedback. This feedback amplifies regional and global warming. By deploying reflective particles, the strategy aims to artificially increase the albedo of the ocean surface, mimicking the lost ice. This would cause more sunlight to be reflected, directly counteracting or weakening the ice-albedo positive feedback loop. The other options describe different parts of the climate system that are not the direct target of an albedo modification strategy.

Question 20

Which of the following scenarios provides the clearest example of the ice-albedo feedback amplifying a cooling trend?

  1. A warming climate causes permafrost to thaw, releasing methane, which leads to further warming and more permafrost thaw.
  2. A decrease in solar radiation causes global temperatures to drop, leading to the expansion of continental ice sheets and a further drop in temperature. (correct answer)
  3. Increased snowfall on a glacier causes its mass to increase, but the surface remains white, keeping the local albedo constant.
  4. Soot and dust from industrial sources settle on Arctic snow, causing the surface to absorb more sunlight and melt faster.

Explanation: A positive feedback amplifies an initial change. In a cooling scenario, the ice-albedo feedback works as follows: initial cooling allows for the expansion of ice and snow cover. This highly reflective surface increases Earth's overall albedo, causing more solar radiation to be reflected back to space, which leads to further cooling. This matches scenario B. Scenario A describes the permafrost-carbon feedback, not ice-albedo. Scenario C describes a situation with no feedback, as albedo does not change. Scenario D describes a forcing (deposition of soot) that decreases albedo and causes warming, which is the opposite of amplifying a cooling trend.