What this quiz covers
This quiz focuses on Evaluate Reasonable Compensation Strategies, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for CPA Tcp.
The IRS may challenge compensation paid by a closely held C corporation to a shareholder-employee as unreasonable if:
CPA Tcp Quiz
Practice Evaluate Reasonable Compensation Strategies in CPA Tcp with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.
This quiz focuses on Evaluate Reasonable Compensation Strategies, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for CPA Tcp.
Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.
The IRS may challenge compensation paid by a closely held C corporation to a shareholder-employee as unreasonable if:
Explanation: Unreasonable compensation in a C corp context typically involves overpaying shareholder-employees to disguise nondeductible dividends as deductible compensation. Answer B is correct. Market-rate compensation (A) is the safe harbor. Small ownership (C) doesn't trigger IRS concern. Bonus form (D) is not itself improper.
In an S corporation context, the IRS may challenge compensation paid to a shareholder-employee as unreasonably low if:
Explanation: S corp shareholders who work for the company must receive reasonable compensation as wages - distributions avoid FICA, so underpaying wages and overpaying distributions is a common IRS target. Answer A is correct. Above-market pay (B) is an S corp shareholder-employee concern, but lower pay is the typical S corp abuse. Different amounts (C) are acceptable. Hours worked (D) alone don't determine reasonableness.
Courts typically use multiple factors to evaluate whether compensation is 'reasonable.' Which of the following is NOT a commonly used factor?
Explanation: Family relationship to a founder is generally not a factor in the reasonable compensation analysis - courts look at economic, market, and performance factors. Answer D is correct. Qualifications (A), market comparables (B), and company financials (C) are all commonly used factors.
A C corporation that has historically paid no dividends and consistently absorbs all profits through compensation to shareholder-employees is most at risk for:
Explanation: Using all-compensation/no-dividend policy to avoid double taxation is the classic IRS target - compensation may be recharacterized as dividends to prevent deductibility. Answer A is correct. The AET (B) applies to accumulated retained earnings, but the scenario shows no retained earnings. PHC tax (C) relates to passive income. Criminal prosecution (D) requires fraudulent intent.
Which of the following actions best protects a C corporation from an IRS challenge to shareholder-employee compensation?
Explanation: Best practices to defend reasonable compensation include independent studies, objective board approval, contemporaneous documentation, and market benchmarking. Answer D is correct. Inflation adjustment (A) doesn't establish market reasonableness. Profit-based bonuses (B) may be challenged if total compensation is excessive. Related-party approval (C) lacks independence.
Which of the following correctly describes the tax treatment of a bonus paid to a shareholder-employee that is determined to be reasonable compensation?
Explanation: Reasonable compensation (including bonuses) is deductible by the corporation and taxable as ordinary income/wages to the recipient, subject to payroll taxes. Answer B is correct. Accrual-basis corps can deduct bonuses paid within 2.5 months after year-end (A - not limited to year-end). Bonuses are ordinary income (C). Deductible compensation reduces E&P (D - incorrect characterization).
A closely held C corporation pays its sole shareholder-employee a $500,000 salary. After paying the salary, the corporation has only $10,000 of net income. The IRS examines the reasonableness of the compensation. A key consideration is:
Explanation: The near-total absorption of corporate income as compensation is circumstantial evidence of disguised dividends - the key test is whether the amount is reasonable for the services. Answer C is correct. Prior dividend history (A) is relevant but not the key factor. Prior year consistency (B) is one factor but not determinative. Payment timing (D) is irrelevant.
An S corporation pays its shareholder-employee a reasonable salary of $75,000. The S corporation has additional net income of $150,000 that flows through to the shareholder as a distribution. The net income distribution:
Explanation: S corporation distributions are not subject to FICA or SE tax - only the reasonable salary portion is subject to payroll taxes. The 3.8% NIIT doesn't automatically apply to S corp active owners. Answer C is correct. Distributions are not subject to FICA (A). S corp income is not SE income (B). Active S corp owners are generally excluded from NIIT on their S corp income (D).
A CPA is asked to help an S corporation shareholder-employee determine reasonable compensation. The most important factor is:
Explanation: Reasonable compensation must reflect the actual value of services - what the market would pay a non-owner employee for the same work. Answer B is correct. Minimizing payroll taxes through low compensation (A) is the IRS's target concern. No 30% safe harbor exists (C). Contract amounts must still be market-reasonable (D).
A 100% owner-employee of an S corporation performs services worth $120,000 annually but pays herself only $30,000 in wages, taking $90,000 in distributions. After an IRS audit, the most likely outcome is:
Explanation: The IRS will reclassify distributions to reach the $120,000 reasonable compensation level - the $90,000 shortfall in wages will be recharacterized as wages subject to payroll taxes. Answer A is correct. S corp distributions are deductible (B - irrelevant since distributions aren't expenses). Reclassifying wages as distributions (C) is the opposite of what the IRS does. Total compensation includes distributions reclassified as wages (D is misapplied).
A two-person S corporation pays one shareholder-employee $100,000 in wages and the other shareholder-employee, who works equal hours, $20,000 in wages. The difference reflects the different ownership percentages (70%/30%). Is the compensation structure reasonable?
Explanation: S corp wages must reflect services provided, not ownership percentages. Equal work should command comparable compensation - tying wages to ownership to shift income tax or payroll taxes is improper. Answer A is correct. Ownership proportionality is not the standard (B). Individual compensation must each be reasonable (C). The IRS may raise this independently (D).
An S corporation's shareholder-employee receives $50,000 in wages. The IRS determines reasonable compensation should be $90,000. The IRS reclassifies $40,000 from distributions to wages. The primary tax impact is:
Explanation: The primary impact of reclassifying S corp distributions as wages is FICA taxes - both employer and employee FICA apply to the reclassified wages. Answer D is correct. Income tax on $40,000 is minimal since the shareholder already paid income tax on the distribution (A). S corps are generally not taxpayers (B). Basis adjustments are affected but the primary impact is FICA (C).
A shareholder-employee of a profitable S corporation receives no salary but takes $200,000 in distributions. The IRS audits and determines that reasonable compensation for the shareholder-employee's services is $80,000. The most likely adjustment is:
Explanation: The IRS will reclassify $80,000 (the reasonable compensation amount) as wages subject to FICA, not the full $200,000. Answer A is correct. Only the reasonable compensation amount is reclassified (B). Income recharacterization (C) is not the primary adjustment. S corp shareholders pay wages, not SE tax (D).
An independent investor test is used by some courts to evaluate reasonable compensation. Under this test:
Explanation: The independent investor test asks whether the return on equity after paying the compensation would still be acceptable to an outside investor - if yes, the compensation is reasonable. Answer B is correct. The test is about investment returns, not compensation amounts to investors (A). Board approval (C) is a governance practice. Independent contractor benchmarking (D) is a different approach.
If a C corporation pays unreasonable compensation to a shareholder-employee, the disallowed portion is treated as a constructive dividend. The corporation's tax consequence is:
Explanation: Disallowed compensation increases the corporation's taxable income - it is not deductible as a dividend. Answer A is correct. Dividends are not deductible for C corporations (B). No refund arises from compensation disallowance (C). Stock basis adjustments are not affected (D).
For an S corporation shareholder-employee, the distinction between compensation and distributions matters because:
Explanation: The key difference is FICA treatment - wages are subject to payroll taxes, distributions are not. This creates the incentive to minimize wages in S corps. Answer C is correct. Distributions are not taxed at higher rates (A). Both compensation and distributions are subject to income tax (B). Distributions reduce stock basis affecting at-risk, but FICA avoidance is the main concern (D).
A self-employed individual (sole proprietor) performing services is not subject to reasonable compensation rules in the same way as a shareholder-employee. This is because:
Explanation: Self-employment tax applies to all net SE income of a sole proprietor - there's no corporate distribution mechanism to avoid SE tax, so the reasonable compensation issue doesn't arise in the same way. Answer C is correct. Sole proprietors do pay SE tax (A). Sole proprietors cannot deduct personal compensation (B). Tax rates vary (D).
Which of the following professionals is most likely to be challenged on reasonable compensation grounds by the IRS?
Explanation: A physician with low wages and high distributions from a professional S corporation is a classic IRS reasonable compensation target - the services are worth far more than $40,000 and the excess is clearly wage income being disguised as distributions. Answer B is correct. Public company compensation (A) has different issues. Non-owner above-market pay (C) is not a reasonable compensation concern. Market-rate C corp compensation (D) has no issue.
When evaluating reasonable compensation in a family-owned business, the IRS pays particular attention to:
Explanation: Income shifting through inflated compensation to lower-bracket family members is an IRS concern - compensation must reflect actual value of services regardless of family relationships. Answer B is correct. Joint filing (A) is irrelevant. Equal compensation (C) is not required. Employment agreements (D) are good practice but don't ensure reasonableness.
In evaluating reasonable compensation for tax purposes, which approach involves paying the shareholder-employee an amount similar to what an unrelated third party would receive for the same services?
Explanation: Market comparables benchmark the shareholder-employee's pay against industry and regional data for similar positions. Answer D is correct. The independent investor test (A) focuses on investment returns. Hypothetical market rate (B) and internal consistency test (C) are not standard approaches in this context.