Conversational Mandarin Chinese Quiz: Using Counters
8 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Using CountersQuestion 1 of 8

A shop sign reads: "牛肉：每公斤八十八块。" A customer asks for 半公斤 (half a kilogram) of beef.

The cashier rings up the purchase. Which of the following correctly expresses both the quantity purchased AND the price the customer should pay?

半公斤牛肉，四十四块 — because 半 means one-half, so the price is halved from 88 yuan per kilogram
五百克牛肉，八十八块 — because 半公斤 equals 500 grams, and 500 grams is close enough to a full kilogram to be charged the full rate
半公斤牛肉，八十八块 — because 半 is a counter meaning 'one standard portion,' which is priced at the full kilogram rate
一斤牛肉，四十四块 — because in the traditional Chinese weight system, 斤 and 公斤 are interchangeable units, so 半公斤 can be relabeled as 一斤 at half the price
← Back to quizzes

Conversational Mandarin Chinese Quiz

Conversational Mandarin Chinese Quiz: Using Counters

Practice Using Counters in Conversational Mandarin Chinese with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Using Counters, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Conversational Mandarin Chinese.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A shop sign reads: "牛肉：每公斤八十八块。" A customer asks for 半公斤 (half a kilogram) of beef.

The cashier rings up the purchase. Which of the following correctly expresses both the quantity purchased AND the price the customer should pay?

  1. 半公斤牛肉，四十四块 — because 半 means one-half, so the price is halved from 88 yuan per kilogram (correct answer)
  2. 五百克牛肉，八十八块 — because 半公斤 equals 500 grams, and 500 grams is close enough to a full kilogram to be charged the full rate
  3. 半公斤牛肉，八十八块 — because 半 is a counter meaning 'one standard portion,' which is priced at the full kilogram rate
  4. 一斤牛肉，四十四块 — because in the traditional Chinese weight system, 斤 and 公斤 are interchangeable units, so 半公斤 can be relabeled as 一斤 at half the price
Explanation: When a price is listed per unit (每公斤 = per kilogram), your job is to scale the price proportionally to the quantity actually purchased. This is a straightforward unit-price calculation dressed up in Mandarin vocabulary. The sign states beef costs 88块 per 公斤. The customer requests 半公斤 — and 半 (bàn) simply means "half." So the customer is buying 12\frac{1}{2} kilogram, which means they owe 88×12=4488 \times \frac{1}{2} = 44 块. Answer A captures this perfectly: the quantity is correctly stated as 半公斤, and the price is correctly halved to 四十四块. Answer B makes a factual error disguised as a unit conversion. While it's true that 半公斤 = 500克 (500 grams), 500 grams is not close enough to a kilogram to charge the full rate — that would mean charging double for half the product. The unit conversion is right; the pricing logic is completely wrong. Answer C invents a false definition of 半. 半 is not a counter meaning "one standard portion" — it is a straightforward modifier meaning one-half. There is no special merchandising rule that makes half a kilogram cost a full kilogram's price. Answer D confuses 斤 and 公斤, which are not interchangeable. A 公斤 (gōngjīn) is a metric kilogram (1,000g), while a 斤 (jīn) is a traditional Chinese unit equal to 500g — exactly half a 公斤. So 半公斤 ≠ 一斤; they are actually equal in weight, but the pricing logic presented in D is still fabricated. Your study tip: always separate two tasks — unit conversion and price calculation — and verify both independently before choosing an answer.

Question 2

A recipe says: "需要三两盐。" The cook only has a kitchen scale that measures in grams. In the modern Chinese standard, 一两 (liǎng) equals 50 grams.

The cook needs to measure the correct amount of salt. Which statement correctly identifies both the number of grams needed AND uses an appropriate counter expression?

  1. 需要一百克盐，因为三两等于一百克，克是公制的重量单位。
  2. 需要一百五十克盐，因为三两等于一百五十克，克是公制的重量单位。 (correct answer)
  3. 需要三百克盐，因为三两等于三百克，两和克的换算是一比一百。
  4. 需要七十五克盐，因为三两等于七十五克，两和克的换算是一比二十五。
Explanation: When you encounter unit conversion questions in Mandarin, your job is twofold: perform the math correctly and verify that the Chinese measurement vocabulary is used accurately. Both parts matter equally. The key fact here is that in the modern Chinese standard, 一两 (yī liǎng) = 50 grams. So to convert 三两 to grams, you simply multiply: 3×50=150 grams3 \times 50 = 150 \text{ grams} That makes B the correct answer. It states 需要一百五十克盐 (150 grams of salt) and correctly identifies 克 (kè) as the metric unit of weight — both the calculation and the counter expression are accurate. Looking at the wrong answers: A calculates 100 grams, which would only be correct for 二两 (2 × 50 = 100). It makes an arithmetic error by dropping one 两 entirely. C claims the conversion ratio is 一比一百 (1:100), meaning one 两 equals 100 grams — this is simply wrong and inflates the result to 300 grams. D invents a ratio of 一比二十五 (1:25), arriving at 75 grams, which has no basis in any standard Chinese measurement system. Both C and D reflect a common trap: confusing the 两 with other unit systems (like the older 斤 system where 一斤 = 500 grams and 一两 = 31.25 grams) or simply guessing at conversion rates. A good study habit: memorize the two versions of 两 — the modern standard (50g) versus the traditional apothecary weight (~31.25g). Exam passages will usually specify which applies, so read the context carefully before calculating.

Question 3

A tourist asks a shopkeeper: "这件毛衣多少钱？" The shopkeeper replies: "两百五。"

The tourist is unsure about the price. Which explanation correctly clarifies what 两百五 most naturally means in this everyday market context, and why?

  1. 两百五 naturally means 2,500 yuan because 五 here functions as a counter for hundreds, making the full amount two-hundred-five-hundreds.
  2. 两百五 naturally means 205 yuan because in spoken Mandarin, digits following a hundreds number are always read as single units, so 五 simply adds five to 两百.
  3. 两百五 naturally means 250 yuan because it is short for 两百五十, where 五 represents 五十 (fifty) as an abbreviated spoken form in casual pricing contexts. (correct answer)
  4. 两百五 naturally means 2,500 yuan because in market speech, the last digit is always multiplied by the previous unit, so 五 × 百 equals five hundred, added to 两百.
Explanation: When you hear prices in casual Mandarin conversation, pay attention to how spoken numbers get abbreviated — shopkeepers regularly drop syllables to speed things up, and knowing these patterns prevents costly misunderstandings. In Mandarin, round numbers are frequently truncated in speech. 两百五 is a classic example: it's short for 两百五十 (liǎng bǎi wǔshí), meaning 250. The 五 here stands in for 五十 (fifty), because once the listener hears 两百 (two hundred), the next unit naturally implies tens. This kind of shorthand is deeply embedded in everyday market speech — you'll hear it constantly at street stalls and small shops. So C is correct: 两百五 most naturally means 250 yuan through this standard abbreviation. A is wrong on two counts: 五 does not function as a counter for hundreds, and 2,500 would be expressed as 两千五百 or colloquially 两千五 — not 两百五. The logic A describes simply doesn't exist in Mandarin grammar. D makes a similar error, inventing a multiplication rule ("五 × 百") that has no basis in how Mandarin numbers work — this is pure fabrication. B is the trickiest distractor because it sounds plausible: yes, digits can follow hundreds, but 205 would actually be said 两百零五 (with 零 marking the gap). Without 零, 五 after 两百 implies a tens unit, not a ones unit — making 250, not 205, the natural reading. As a study tip: memorize that in spoken pricing, a bare digit after a place value (百, 千, 万) typically abbreviates the next lower unit — 两百五 = 250, 两千五 = 2,500.

Question 4

Two friends are shopping. Friend A says: "我有五十块。" Friend B says: "那件衬衫要三十八块五毛，那条裤子要六十二块。" Friend A wants to buy both items.

Friend A wants to buy the shirt and the pants. Which statement most accurately describes Friend A's situation?

  1. Friend A has enough money because 三十八块五毛 plus 六十二块 equals 四十八块五毛，which is less than the 五十块 Friend A has, leaving 一块五毛 in change.
  2. Friend A does not have enough money because the total is 一百零五毛，which exceeds the 五十块 Friend A has by 五十五毛。
  3. Friend A does not have enough money because the total is 一百块五毛，which exceeds the 五十块 Friend A has by 五十块五毛。 (correct answer)
  4. Friend A has just barely enough money because 三十八块五毛 rounds down to 三十八块，and 六十二块 minus 三十八块 equals 二十四块，which is under 五十块。
Explanation: When a question involves Chinese money (人民币), your job is to carefully add up the amounts using the correct units: 块 (kuài) = yuan, 毛 (máo) = 1/10 of a yuan. Keep those units straight before drawing any conclusions. Here, Friend A has 五十块 (¥50.00). The shirt costs 三十八块五毛 (¥38.50) and the pants cost 六十二块 (¥62.00). Adding them together: 38.50+62.00=100.5038.50 + 62.00 = 100.50 That's 一百块五毛 (¥100.50). Since ¥100.50 exceeds ¥50.00, Friend A is short by ¥50.50 — exactly 五十块五毛. That makes C the correct answer. Choice A is wrong because it claims the total is 四十八块五毛 (¥48.50), which appears to have subtracted the prices instead of adding them, or simply miscalculated entirely. The math doesn't hold up no matter how you look at it. Choice B gets the addition mostly right but misreads the units — writing 一百零五毛 (105 máo = ¥10.50) instead of 一百块五毛 (¥100.50). This is a classic unit-confusion trap: 块 and 毛 are not interchangeable, and dropping the 块 changes the value dramatically. Choice D introduces rounding, which has no place in a straightforward price calculation. Prices in Chinese transactions are taken at face value — you never round down a cost to make the math convenient. As a study habit, always write out the decimal equivalents of Chinese currency expressions before adding. Converting 三十八块五毛 → ¥38.50 instantly prevents the unit-mixing errors that fuel most wrong answers on money questions.

Question 5

A store is having a sale. The sign reads: "买三送一" (Buy three, get one free). Oranges are normally 两块一个. A customer wants to end up with 八个橙子 and pay as little as possible by taking full advantage of the promotion.

How much should the customer pay for 八个橙子 under the best use of this promotion?

  1. 十块，because the customer buys five oranges at 两块一个 and receives three free under a generous reading of the promotion.
  2. 十六块，because the customer must pay for all eight oranges at 两块一个 since the promotion only applies to single purchases.
  3. 十四块，because the customer buys seven oranges at 两块一个 and receives one free under a single application of the promotion.
  4. 十二块，because the customer buys six oranges at 两块一个 and receives two free under the promotion applied twice. (correct answer)
Explanation: When you see a promotion like "买三送一," the key skill is figuring out how to apply it the maximum number of times to minimize total cost. Think of it as a repeating cycle: every group of four oranges costs you three (买三) and the fourth is free (送一). To get 八个橙子, you should mentally divide them into groups of four. Eight oranges = two complete groups of four. In each group, you pay for three and receive one free. So you pay for 3×2=63 \times 2 = 6 oranges total, at 两块 each: 6×2=12块6 \times 2 = 12块. You receive two oranges free — one per group. This confirms D is correct: 十二块 for six paid oranges plus two free ones. A is tempting if you misread the promotion as unusually generous, imagining you can receive three free oranges by buying only five. That's not how "买三送一" works — you get exactly one free per group of three purchased, not three free at once. B ignores the promotion entirely, as if it doesn't apply. In a real transaction, any customer would use an available discount, so paying for all eight at 十六块 makes no strategic sense. C applies the promotion only once — buying seven and getting one free for 十四块. This misses that you can apply "买三送一" repeatedly as long as you have complete groups of three. With eight oranges, two full cycles are possible. Your strategy tip: always divide the total quantity by four to find how many complete "买三送一" cycles fit, multiply the remainder by the regular price, and add the cost of paid oranges per cycle.

Question 6

A student hears: "请给我拿四条裤子和三条鱼。" The student is surprised that the same counter 条 is used for both pants and fish. Which of the following best explains this usage AND correctly identifies a third item that could also use 条?

  1. 条 is used for long, flexible, or elongated objects/creatures; both pants (with two leg tubes) and fish (elongated body) fit this category. 条 would also correctly count 一条绳子 (a rope). (correct answer)
  2. 条 is used specifically for aquatic animals and clothing items; its usage is restricted to these two categories. 条 would also correctly count 一条椅子 (a chair).
  3. 条 is used for any item that comes in multiples or sets; pants and fish are both commonly bought in groups. 条 would also correctly count 一条书 (a book).
  4. 条 is an all-purpose counter used when no specific counter exists; pants and fish both lack dedicated counters. 条 would also correctly count 一条苹果 (an apple).
Explanation: When you encounter measure words (量词) in Mandarin, the key question to ask is: what physical or conceptual property does this counter capture? Many students assume counters are arbitrary, but most have an underlying logic rooted in shape, nature, or category. 条 (tiáo) is fundamentally the counter for things that are long, flexible, or elongated — whether literally or conceptually. Fish have streamlined, elongated bodies, which fits perfectly. Pants, though clothing, have two long tubular leg sections, making them "long and flexible" in structure. This same logic extends to ropes, rivers, roads, snakes, and even news items (which "stretch" linearly in a narrative sense). Answer A correctly identifies this unifying principle and provides 一条绳子 (a rope) as a valid third example — ropes are quintessentially long and flexible, making this a textbook application of 条. Answer B is wrong because 条 is not restricted to aquatic animals and clothing — that framing is far too narrow and invented. 一条椅子 is also incorrect because chairs are compact, rigid, and non-elongated objects, which use 把 instead. Answer C misrepresents 条 entirely; it has nothing to do with items "coming in multiples." 一条书 is wrong anyway — books use 本 (běn). Answer D is similarly false; 条 is not a catch-all counter, and Mandarin does have a dedicated counter structure for nearly every category. 一条苹果 is nonsensical since apples are round and use 个. A useful study habit: when memorizing measure words, group them by the shape logic they encode (flat → 张, long/flexible → 条, bound volumes → 本). This pattern-based approach will help you extend your knowledge to new vocabulary you haven't explicitly studied.

Question 7

A learner wants to say: "I bought three pairs of shoes and two pieces of clothing." Which sentence correctly uses the appropriate counters for both shoes and clothing?

  1. 我买了三件鞋和两双衣服。
  2. 我买了三双鞋和两套衣服。
  3. 我买了三只鞋和两件衣服。
  4. 我买了三双鞋和两件衣服。 (correct answer)
Explanation: In Mandarin, measure words (量词) are required between a number and a noun — and different nouns demand specific measure words. When you see a question involving clothing or footwear, your first instinct should be to match each item with its conventional counter. For shoes, the correct measure word is 双 (shuāng), meaning "pair," since shoes naturally come in pairs. For clothing, 件 (jiàn) is the standard general counter for individual garments like shirts, jackets, or pants. That makes "三双鞋和两件衣服" the grammatically and culturally accurate phrasing — which is exactly what D provides: 我买了三双鞋和两件衣服. Now let's look at where the other choices go wrong. A uses 三件鞋, which swaps the counters — 件 is for clothing items, not shoes, so applying it to 鞋 is a category error. B uses 两套衣服, which isn't necessarily wrong in all contexts (套 means "set" or "suit," as in a matching outfit), but it implies a coordinated ensemble rather than individual pieces of clothing — it doesn't best match the neutral phrasing "two pieces of clothing." C uses 三只鞋, which is perhaps the trickiest trap: 只 counts individual items (one shoe, one sock, one glove), so 三只鞋 would mean three individual shoes — an odd, mismatched quantity, not three pairs. Study tip: Memorize measure words in pairs with their nouns — 双 for paired items (shoes, socks, chopsticks), 件 for individual garments, and 套 specifically for matched sets. These pairings appear frequently on the exam.

Question 8

Your friend says: "我买了两打鸡蛋。" You need to tell another friend exactly how many eggs were bought, using the standard counter 个. Which sentence correctly converts the quantity?

  1. 他买了二十个鸡蛋，因为一打是十个。
  2. 他买了二十四个鸡蛋，因为一打是十二个。 (correct answer)
  3. 他买了二十个鸡蛋，因为两打就是两组十个。
  4. 他买了十二个鸡蛋，因为打这个量词就代表一组十二个的意思。
Explanation: When you encounter the measure word 打 (dǎ) in Mandarin, you need to recognize it as a borrowed unit from English: a "dozen." Just like in English, 一打 always equals 12 items, not 10. This question tests whether you know that specific conversion. Since 一打 = 12, then 两打 = 2 × 12 = 24. So when your friend says "我买了两打鸡蛋," the correct conversion using 个 is: 他买了二十四个鸡蛋，因为一打是十二个。That's exactly what B states, making it the correct answer. Now let's look at why the other options fail. A claims 一打 equals 10, which is simply wrong — this is the core misconception the question is designed to trap you with. Ten has its own perfectly good expression in Mandarin (十个), and 打 was borrowed specifically to mean "dozen." C also lands on 20 eggs with the same flawed logic, framing "两打" as "two groups of ten" — again, 打 ≠ 10, no matter how you phrase it. D gets the definition of 打 right (a group of twelve) but only multiplies by one instead of two, giving 12 eggs instead of 24. It ignores the 两 (two) in "两打" entirely — a classic reading-too-fast error. A useful memory trick: 打 sounds like the English word "dozen," and a dozen is always 12. Whenever you see 打 as a measure word, immediately think "× 12," then multiply by the number preceding it.