Conversational Mandarin Chinese Quiz: Interpreting Ads And Notices
7 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Interpreting Ads And NoticesQuestion 1 of 7

健身房会员招募

即日起新会员入会优惠：

  • 月卡：原价300元/月，现价240元/月
  • 季卡（3个月）：原价900元，现价650元
  • 年卡：原价3600元，现价2400元

所有卡种均包含无限次普通器械使用。团操课（瑜伽、有氧等）月卡会员每节另收50元，季卡及年卡会员免费不限次参加。私教课所有会员均需另行购买课时包，不含在内。新会员注册费：一次性收取100元，不可退。

A new member plans to join for exactly 3 months and intends to attend 2 group fitness classes per week (approximately 12 classes over 3 months). Ignoring private training, which membership option results in the lowest total cost for her 3-month plan?

The quarterly card is the best option at 750 yuan total (650 yuan + 100 yuan registration), since group classes are included free, and three monthly cards would cost only 820 yuan total (720 yuan + 100 yuan registration) with group classes also free for monthly members.
Three monthly cards are the best option: at 240 yuan per month, the three-month cost is 720 yuan plus 100 yuan registration equals 820 yuan, which is slightly more than the quarterly card but avoids the commitment of a longer-term membership.
The quarterly card is the best option: three monthly cards cost 720 yuan in membership fees plus 600 yuan for 12 group classes at 50 yuan each plus 100 yuan registration equals 1,420 yuan total, whereas the quarterly card costs 650 yuan plus 100 yuan registration equals 750 yuan, with group classes included at no extra charge.
The annual card is the best option: at 2,400 yuan for 12 months, the effective monthly cost is 200 yuan, which is lower than any other option per month, and group classes are included free, making it cheapest overall even for a 3-month plan.
← Back to quizzes

Conversational Mandarin Chinese Quiz

Conversational Mandarin Chinese Quiz: Interpreting Ads And Notices

Practice Interpreting Ads And Notices in Conversational Mandarin Chinese with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Interpreting Ads And Notices, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Conversational Mandarin Chinese.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

健身房会员招募

即日起新会员入会优惠：

  • 月卡：原价300元/月，现价240元/月
  • 季卡（3个月）：原价900元，现价650元
  • 年卡：原价3600元，现价2400元

所有卡种均包含无限次普通器械使用。团操课（瑜伽、有氧等）月卡会员每节另收50元，季卡及年卡会员免费不限次参加。私教课所有会员均需另行购买课时包，不含在内。新会员注册费：一次性收取100元，不可退。

A new member plans to join for exactly 3 months and intends to attend 2 group fitness classes per week (approximately 12 classes over 3 months). Ignoring private training, which membership option results in the lowest total cost for her 3-month plan?

  1. The quarterly card is the best option at 750 yuan total (650 yuan + 100 yuan registration), since group classes are included free, and three monthly cards would cost only 820 yuan total (720 yuan + 100 yuan registration) with group classes also free for monthly members.
  2. Three monthly cards are the best option: at 240 yuan per month, the three-month cost is 720 yuan plus 100 yuan registration equals 820 yuan, which is slightly more than the quarterly card but avoids the commitment of a longer-term membership.
  3. The quarterly card is the best option: three monthly cards cost 720 yuan in membership fees plus 600 yuan for 12 group classes at 50 yuan each plus 100 yuan registration equals 1,420 yuan total, whereas the quarterly card costs 650 yuan plus 100 yuan registration equals 750 yuan, with group classes included at no extra charge. (correct answer)
  4. The annual card is the best option: at 2,400 yuan for 12 months, the effective monthly cost is 200 yuan, which is lower than any other option per month, and group classes are included free, making it cheapest overall even for a 3-month plan.
Explanation: When comparing membership options, you need to calculate the complete cost for each scenario — including all applicable fees, not just the base membership price. This question tests whether you carefully read which benefits are included for each card type. The passage states that group fitness classes (团操课) cost an extra 50 yuan per class for monthly cardholders, but are free and unlimited for quarterly and annual cardholders. This distinction is the entire crux of the question. For the quarterly card: 650+100=750 yuan total650 + 100 = 750 \text{ yuan total}, with all 12 group classes included at no additional charge. For three monthly cards: 240×3+12×50+100=720+600+100=1,420 yuan total240 \times 3 + 12 \times 50 + 100 = 720 + 600 + 100 = 1{,}420 \text{ yuan total}. The quarterly card saves her 670 yuan, making C clearly correct. Choice A is wrong on a critical factual point — it claims monthly card members get group classes free, which directly contradicts the passage. This is the most dangerous distractor because it performs the math correctly but misreads the key policy. Choice B makes the same error: it ignores the 50-yuan-per-class surcharge for monthly members entirely, dramatically undercounting their true cost. Choice D commits a different kind of error — comparing per-month rates when the member only needs 3 months. Paying 2,400 yuan for a 12-month annual card when you only use 3 months is never the cheapest option for that plan, regardless of the effective monthly rate. Your takeaway: always identify what's included vs. what costs extra for each tier before doing any math. Read benefit tables line by line.

Question 2

促销广告

【全场大促】即日起至本月底，全场商品八折优惠！购物满300元另享九折，两项优惠不可叠加，以较优惠者为准。会员另享积分双倍，非会员可凭此广告截图享受与会员同等积分待遇（积分不可兑换现金，仅可用于下次消费抵扣）。购物满500元免费送货上门（市区范围内）。

A non-member customer buys items totaling 400 yuan (original price). She shows the ad screenshot at checkout. Which of the following correctly describes her final payment and benefits?

  1. She pays 320 yuan (80% of 400), receives only standard single points since the screenshot benefit does not apply to the points program for non-members, and qualifies for free delivery because her pre-discount total exceeds 300 yuan.
  2. She pays 360 yuan (90% of 400), receives double points like a member because of her screenshot, and does not qualify for free delivery since her pre-discount total of 400 yuan is below the 500-yuan threshold.
  3. She pays 320 yuan (80% of 400), receives double points like a member because of her screenshot, and does not qualify for free delivery since her final payment of 320 yuan is below the 500-yuan threshold. (correct answer)
  4. She pays 360 yuan (90% of 400), receives only standard single points as a non-member despite the screenshot, and qualifies for free delivery because the 500-yuan threshold is evaluated before any discount is applied.
Explanation: When reading Chinese promotional ads, you need to track multiple overlapping rules carefully — discounts, thresholds, and member benefits each have their own conditions that interact in specific ways. Here, the ad offers two discounts: 八折 (80% of total, i.e., 20% off everything) or 九折 (90% of total) when spending over 300 yuan. Crucially, 两项优惠不可叠加，以较优惠者为准 — the two cannot be combined; the better deal applies. For a 400-yuan purchase, 八折 gives 400×0.8=320400 \times 0.8 = 320 yuan, while 九折 gives 400×0.9=360400 \times 0.9 = 360 yuan. Since 320 < 360, the 八折 discount is better, so she pays 320 yuan. Next, the ad explicitly states non-members showing the screenshot enjoy 与会员同等积分待遇 — the same points treatment as members, meaning double points. Finally, free delivery requires spending 满500元. The threshold applies to her final payment of 320 yuan, which falls short, so no free delivery. This confirms C as correct. Choice A fails because it wrongly denies the screenshot's points benefit, which the ad clearly extends to non-members, and incorrectly grants free delivery based on the pre-discount price. Choice B gets the discount wrong — 九折 is not the better deal here; 八折 is, since she saves more. Choice D makes two errors: it applies the worse discount (九折) and incorrectly claims the 500-yuan threshold uses pre-discount price. When reading promotional Chinese, underline every 不可 and 以…为准 — these limiting clauses are where exam questions hide their traps.

Question 3

培训班招生简章

汉语口语强化班即日起招生。课程分为初级（A1–A2）、中级（B1–B2）和高级（C1–C2）三个级别。每班限招15人，满员即止。报名条件：初级班无需基础；中级班需通过HSK3级或提交相关证明；高级班仅限已完成本机构中级课程的学员，不接受外部证书。学费：初级800元，中级1200元，高级1500元，报名时需预付50%，余款于第一节课前结清。

A student holds an HSK4 certificate and has never studied at this institution before. She wants to join the advanced class to accelerate her progress. Which statement best describes her situation?

  1. She qualifies for the advanced class because her HSK4 certificate exceeds the minimum requirement of HSK3, demonstrating she is beyond the intermediate level.
  2. She does not qualify for the advanced class because it is restricted to students who completed the intermediate course at this specific institution, regardless of external certificates. (correct answer)
  3. She does not qualify for the advanced class, but she can enroll in the intermediate class by submitting her HSK4 certificate as proof, then progress to advanced after completing it.
  4. She qualifies for the advanced class only if she can verify that the HSK4 examination was administered by an officially recognized body, since the ad requires external certificates to be 'relevant proof.'
Explanation: When reading enrollment announcements (招生简章) in Mandarin, pay close attention to restriction language — words like "仅限" (only/exclusively limited to) signal absolute conditions with no exceptions. The advanced class (高级班) states clearly: "仅限已完成本机构中级课程的学员，不接受外部证书" — it is exclusively for students who completed this institution's intermediate course, and explicitly rejects external certificates. Since the student has never studied at this institution, she is categorically excluded from the advanced class. B is therefore correct. A is wrong because it assumes a higher certificate automatically unlocks higher-tier enrollment. The passage doesn't operate on a "HSK level ≥ threshold" logic for the advanced class — it operates on an institutional history requirement. Her HSK4 is simply irrelevant here. C is the most tempting distractor. It correctly identifies that HSK4 would qualify her for the intermediate class (中级班 accepts HSK3 or equivalent proof), and the progression pathway sounds logical. However, the question asks specifically about her situation right now regarding the advanced class — and B already captures that she doesn't qualify. More importantly, C implies she can eventually move to advanced after completing intermediate here, which is plausible but speculative and not what the question is testing. D invents a verification requirement that doesn't exist in the passage. The text never mentions scrutinizing whether an external body is "officially recognized" — it simply rejects all external certificates for the advanced class outright. Your strategy: when a passage uses "仅限...不接受..." (exclusively limited to... does not accept...), treat it as a hard wall — no outside credentials can climb over it.

Question 4

活动通知

本图书馆将于下周六举办「亲子阅读节」活动。活动分两场：上午场（9:00–11:30）适合3–6岁儿童，需家长陪同；下午场（14:00–16:30）适合7–12岁儿童，儿童可独立参加，家长可选择陪同或等候。每场限额30组（名）。报名方式：扫描二维码或到馆前台登记，报名截止时间为本周四晚8点。参与者请于活动开始前15分钟到场签到，迟到超过10分钟者将失去参与资格，名额不予保留。

A parent has a 6-year-old and a 9-year-old. She wants both children to participate in the appropriate sessions. Which of the following correctly identifies the constraints she must plan around?

  1. Both children can attend the same afternoon session, since the 9-year-old falls within the 7–12 age range and the 6-year-old can attend as a younger sibling accompanying a qualifying child, provided the parent registers both before Thursday at 8 PM.
  2. The 6-year-old attends the morning session with the parent present, and the 9-year-old attends the afternoon session alone or with the parent; the key constraints are registering by Thursday at 8 PM and ensuring both children arrive at least 15 minutes before their respective sessions start.
  3. The 6-year-old attends the morning session with the parent present, and the 9-year-old attends the afternoon session alone or with the parent; critically, if either child arrives more than 10 minutes after the session starts, that child's spot is permanently forfeited and will not be held. (correct answer)
  4. Both children must be registered separately for their respective sessions; since the sessions do not overlap, the parent only needs to ensure she is present for the morning session, as the afternoon session permits unaccompanied children and has no lateness penalty for parents.
Explanation: When reading Chinese activity notices (活动通知), you need to extract all stated rules and match them precisely to the situation — age requirements, attendance conditions, registration deadlines, and penalty clauses all matter equally. Here, the passage clearly states: the morning session (9:00–11:30) is for ages 3–6 and requires a parent (需家长陪同), while the afternoon session (14:00–16:30) is for ages 7–12 and children may attend independently (儿童可独立参加). The 6-year-old fits the morning session; the 9-year-old fits the afternoon. Additionally, the notice states that anyone arriving more than 10 minutes late loses their spot permanently (失去参与资格，名额不予保留). Answer C captures all of this accurately — the correct session assignments, the parent requirement for the morning, the flexibility for the afternoon, and the strict no-hold lateness penalty. Answer A is wrong because the notice makes no provision for younger siblings attending outside their age range. You cannot assume an unstated exception exists — the 6-year-old simply does not qualify for the afternoon session. Answer B is tempting because it correctly identifies the sessions and the Thursday registration deadline, but it omits the critical penalty detail: the passage doesn't just say "arrive 15 minutes early" — it specifies that lateness beyond 10 minutes causes permanent forfeiture. Missing this makes B incomplete. Answer D is wrong on two counts: it implies no lateness penalty exists for the afternoon session, which is false, and it incorrectly suggests the parent has no constraints after the morning ends. Your strategy: when a Chinese notice contains penalty language (失去资格, 不予保留), treat it as a key test point — those phrases almost always appear in the correct answer.

Question 5

二手物品出售公告

本人因搬家急售以下物品（均为自用，非商业用途）：

  1. 书桌一张：原价1200元，九成新，售450元

  2. 办公椅一把：原价800元，八成新，售200元

  3. 书架两个：原价各500元，七成新，各售150元

  4. 台灯一盏：原价300元，全新未拆封，售200元

以上物品均为非卖品，恕不还价。打包购买书桌+椅子+书架（两个）可享九折优惠。可上门自提，如需送货另加运费50元（限市区）。联系方式：微信号 jiajia_move。

A buyer wants to purchase the desk, the chair, both bookshelves, and the lamp. She lives in the city and wants everything delivered. What is the total amount she should expect to pay?

  1. She pays 1,035 yuan total: the bundled items (desk + chair + both bookshelves) at 10% off their combined price of 1,000 yuan equals 900 yuan, plus the lamp at 200 yuan, minus 50 yuan delivery, totaling 1,050 yuan with a rounding adjustment.
  2. She pays 1,050 yuan total: the bundled items (desk + chair + both bookshelves) cost 450 + 200 + 150 + 150 = 950 yuan, minus 10% discount equals 855 yuan, plus the lamp at 200 yuan, minus one delivery charge of 50 yuan.
  3. She pays 1,115 yuan total: the bundled items cost 950 yuan at full price (no discount since she is adding the lamp), plus the lamp at 200 yuan, plus delivery at 50 yuan, minus the no-haggling adjustment.
  4. She pays 1,055 yuan total: the bundled items (desk + chair + both bookshelves) cost 950 yuan with a 10% discount applied equals 855 yuan, plus the lamp at 200 yuan, plus delivery at 50 yuan. (correct answer)
Explanation: When reading classified ads in Chinese, you need to track multiple pricing rules simultaneously: listed prices, bundle discounts, and add-on fees — and recognize which rules interact with which items. Here's how to work through this purchase step by step. The buyer wants the desk (450元), chair (200元), both bookshelves (150元 × 2 = 300元), and the lamp (200元), plus delivery. The announcement says buying the desk + chair + both bookshelves together qualifies for a 九折 (90%, or 10% off) discount. That bundle totals 450+200+150+150=950450 + 200 + 150 + 150 = 950 yuan. Applying the discount: 950×0.9=855950 \times 0.9 = 855 yuan. The lamp is purchased separately at full price: 200元. Delivery within the city (市区) adds 50元. Grand total: 855+200+50=1,055855 + 200 + 50 = \mathbf{1{,}055} yuan — confirming D is correct. A is wrong because it incorrectly subtracts the delivery fee rather than adding it, and its math is internally inconsistent. B makes the same subtraction error with delivery — the 50元 fee is an added cost, not a rebate. C misreads the discount rule entirely, claiming the lamp's inclusion cancels the bundle discount; nothing in the ad supports that. The discount applies specifically to the desk + chair + bookshelves combination regardless of what else you buy. A useful strategy: when Chinese ads list bundle deals, check exactly which items are named in the bundle. Extra items outside the bundle follow their own pricing rules independently — the discount doesn't expand or disappear just because you add more items.

Question 6

语言交换伙伴招募

本人：中国人，母语普通话，英语流利（雅思7.5），现居上海。 寻找：以英语为母语的语言交换伙伴，对方需有一定普通话基础（HSK2以上）。 交流方式：线上视频通话为主，每周2次，每次1小时，普通话与英语各半。 时间要求：上海时间周二或周四晚上8–9点（可商量）。 额外说明：本人对商务中文有强烈兴趣，希望伙伴能结合实际商务场景进行练习；不接受仅以旅游会话为目的的申请者。如感兴趣，请发送自我介绍及普通话水平证明至：exchange_sh@email.com。

An American professional is interested in this language exchange. She is a native English speaker, holds an HSK3 certificate, and is primarily interested in travel Mandarin for an upcoming trip to China. She is free on Monday and Wednesday evenings (Chicago time, UTC-6), which correspond to Tuesday and Thursday mornings in Shanghai (UTC+8). The poster has confirmed the Tuesday/Thursday 8–9 PM Shanghai slot works after adjusting for the time difference. Which statement best describes whether she is a suitable candidate?

  1. She is a suitable candidate: she meets the language requirement (native English speaker, HSK3 exceeds the HSK2 minimum), and her availability has been confirmed compatible with the Shanghai schedule after accounting for the time difference.
  2. She is not a suitable candidate primarily because her Monday and Wednesday evening availability in Chicago does not correspond to Tuesday and Thursday evenings in Shanghai, creating an unresolvable scheduling conflict even after adjustment.
  3. She is not a suitable candidate because, although she meets the language level requirement and her schedule has been confirmed compatible, her stated goal of travel Mandarin directly conflicts with the poster's explicit preference for business Chinese practice. (correct answer)
  4. She is not a suitable candidate because HSK3 does not satisfy the requirement; the ad specifies the partner must have a meaningful Mandarin foundation, and HSK3 represents only a basic level that is insufficient for the intended exchange.
Explanation: When reading a recruitment-style passage in Mandarin, train yourself to identify all stated conditions — not just the obvious ones. Posters often include explicit exclusion criteria buried in the 额外说明 (additional notes), and missing even one disqualifier is the classic trap in these questions. Here, the poster lists three requirements: (1) native English speaker, (2) HSK2 or above, and (3) interest in business Chinese — with a direct statement that applicants seeking only travel conversation will not be accepted (不接受仅以旅游会话为目的的申请者). The American professional is a native English speaker ✓, holds HSK3 ✓, and her schedule has been confirmed compatible ✓. However, her stated goal is explicitly travel Mandarin — which the poster explicitly rejects. That single disqualifier makes C the correct answer. Answer A fails because it ignores the content-of-practice requirement entirely. Meeting two out of three conditions isn't enough — the travel-only purpose is a dealbreaker the poster stated in plain language. Answer B is factually wrong about the time zone logic. Chicago (UTC-6) Monday/Wednesday evenings do shift forward 14 hours to Shanghai (UTC+8) Tuesday/Thursday mornings — but the question already tells you the poster confirmed the slot works, so this conflict is resolved, not unresolvable. Answer D misreads the language requirement. HSK2以上 means "HSK2 or higher," so HSK3 clearly satisfies it. This distractor tries to make you second-guess a straightforward "minimum threshold" phrase. Study tip: In reading comprehension questions, always scan for negative conditions (不接受, 不适合, 除非) — they often hold the key to the correct answer and are easy to overlook when you're focused on positive qualifications.

Question 7

社区公告

尊敬的居民：

由于小区地下停车场将于下周一至周三进行消防设施维修，地下停车场届时暂停使用。地面临时停车位仅限本小区业主使用，每辆车每天收费10元。非业主车辆禁止进入。如需提前预约地面车位，请于本周五下午5点前联系物业管理处（3号楼一层，电话：6677889）。逾期未预约者，不保证有车位。

物业管理处 2024年3月15日（周五）

A resident who owns a unit in the complex reads this notice on the day it was posted. She wants to guarantee herself a temporary parking spot during the maintenance period. What is the LATEST action she can take, and by when must she take it?

  1. She must call or visit the property management office to reserve a ground-level spot, and she must do so before 5 PM on the same day the notice was posted, which is Friday. (correct answer)
  2. She must call the property management office before Monday morning when the maintenance begins, since the restriction only starts next week and she has until Sunday night to act.
  3. She must visit the property management office in Building 3 before 5 PM on Friday of next week, since the maintenance runs through Wednesday and reservations remain open throughout.
  4. She must arrive early on Monday morning to claim one of the ground-level spots in person, as the notice states that unpaid residents are not guaranteed a space rather than that reservations are required.
Explanation: When reading Chinese community notices, pay close attention to deadline language — phrases like 逾期 (past the deadline), 届时 (at that time), and 于...前 (before...) signal critical time constraints that questions love to test. The notice states that anyone wanting to guarantee a ground-level spot must contact the property management office before 5 PM on Friday (本周五下午5点前). The notice itself was posted on March 15th, which is explicitly labeled 周五 — Friday. That means the reservation deadline and the posting date are the same day. The resident must act immediately: call or visit Building 3, first floor, by 5 PM that very day. This makes A correct. B is tempting but misreads the deadline. The restriction on entry begins Monday, but the reservation deadline is Friday. Waiting until Sunday night means missing the window entirely — the notice explicitly warns that late reservers are not guaranteed a spot (不保证有车位). C invents a deadline that doesn't exist. There is no mention of reservations staying open through the maintenance period or a "next Friday" cutoff. This answer confuses the maintenance end date (Wednesday) with the reservation window. D misreads 不保证有车位 as meaning reservations are optional and she can simply show up Monday. In fact, that phrase is a consequence of failing to reserve — it warns you won't be guaranteed a spot, implying pre-reservation is the only way to secure one. Study tip: When a Chinese notice includes a specific deadline phrase like 于...前, underline it immediately — exam questions almost always hinge on whether you caught that exact window.