All questions
Question 1
A Chinese acquaintance describes their errand: "我去菜市场买了半斤猪肉馅儿和一斤豆角,然后去超市买了酱油和醋,最后去面包店买了一条吐司。" Which of the following correctly identifies what was purchased and where?
- At the wet market: minced pork and green beans; at the supermarket: soy sauce and vinegar; at the bakery: a loaf of bread — three separate stops in total. (correct answer)
- At the wet market: minced pork and soy sauce; at the supermarket: green beans and vinegar; at the bakery: a loaf of bread — three separate stops in total.
- At the wet market: minced pork and green beans; at the supermarket: soy sauce, vinegar, and bread — two stops in total, since supermarkets in China sell baked goods.
- At the wet market: minced pork, green beans, and vinegar; at the supermarket: soy sauce only; at the bakery: a loaf of bread — three stops but with condiments split between locations.
Explanation: When you hear a shopping narrative in Mandarin, your job is to track who went where and bought what — a core conversational comprehension skill. The sentence structure 去[place]买了[items] ("went to [place] and bought [items]") is your map.
Breaking down the sentence: 菜市场 is the wet market (traditional fresh-food market), where 半斤猪肉馅儿 (half a jin of minced pork) and 一斤豆角 (one jin of green beans) were purchased. Then 超市 (supermarket) is where 酱油 (soy sauce) and 醋 (vinegar) were bought. Finally, 面包店 (bakery/bread shop) is where 一条吐司 (a loaf of toast bread) was picked up. That makes A the correct answer — three stops, with each item matched accurately to its location.
Choice B incorrectly swaps the locations of 酱油 and 豆角, placing soy sauce at the wet market and green beans at the supermarket — the opposite of what the sentence says. Choice C makes a cultural assumption that Chinese supermarkets sell baked goods and therefore collapses the trip into two stops, but the sentence explicitly mentions 面包店 as a third, distinct destination — don't let cultural generalizations override what the speaker actually said. Choice D invents a split for 醋 (vinegar), placing it at the wet market, when the sentence clearly groups both condiments together at the 超市.
Your study tip: In listening comprehension, train yourself to mentally "tag" each location as it appears and list items underneath it in real time. The 去…买了… pattern is your signal to start a new location tag.
Question 2
A menu at a Chinese restaurant lists the following:
- 宫保鸡丁 (Kung Pao Chicken): 38元,微辣
- 鱼香肉丝 (Fish-Fragrant Pork Shreds): 32元,不辣
- 麻婆豆腐 (Mapo Tofu): 28元,重辣
- 糖醋排骨 (Sweet and Sour Ribs): 45元,不辣
A customer tells the waiter: "我不能吃辣,预算在35元以内,你帮我推荐一个菜。"
Based on the customer's stated constraints, which dish should the waiter recommend?
- 宫保鸡丁, because it is the most well-known dish on the menu and is only mildly spicy, which many non-spicy eaters can still tolerate easily.
- 麻婆豆腐, because it is the cheapest option at 28 yuan and the customer could request a non-spicy version from the kitchen to accommodate their preference.
- 糖醋排骨, because it contains no spice at all and is the highest quality dish, even though it slightly exceeds the 35-yuan budget the customer mentioned.
- 鱼香肉丝, because it is not spicy and costs 32 yuan, which falls within the customer's budget of 35 yuan or less. (correct answer)
Explanation: When a question presents a customer's request in Mandarin, your job is to treat their stated conditions as hard constraints — not suggestions. Here, the customer says two things clearly: "我不能吃辣" (I cannot eat spicy food) and "预算在35元以内" (budget within 35 yuan). Both conditions must be satisfied simultaneously for a recommendation to be valid.
鱼香肉丝 is the correct recommendation. It is labeled 不辣 (not spicy), satisfying the dietary constraint, and costs 32元, which falls under the 35-yuan ceiling. It meets both requirements cleanly, making D the right answer.
Now look at why the other options fail. A recommends 宫保鸡丁, which is listed as 微辣 (mildly spicy). The customer said they cannot eat spicy food at all — not that they prefer less spice. "微辣" still means spicy, so this violates constraint one regardless of how popular the dish is. B suggests 麻婆豆腐, which is 重辣 (intensely spicy), and proposes asking the kitchen to modify it. The customer's constraint is about the dish as offered, and you shouldn't invent workarounds the menu doesn't promise. C recommends 糖醋排骨, which is indeed 不辣, but at 45元 it exceeds the 35-yuan budget. The answer even acknowledges this and waves it away with vague language about "quality" — a classic distractor move that dismisses a hard constraint.
A useful strategy: in Mandarin comprehension questions involving real-life scenarios, list every constraint the speaker gives and eliminate any option that fails even one of them. Don't let qualitative praise in a wrong answer (e.g., "most well-known," "highest quality") distract you from the objective conditions stated.
Question 3
A Chinese friend describes a neighborhood service: "那家店可以帮你修鞋、配钥匙,还可以刻章。不过他们不修表,修表要去旁边那家钟表店。" You need to get a key copied, a shoe repaired, and a watch fixed. Which of the following correctly describes where you need to go and for what?
- You need to visit only the first shop to get all three things done, as shoe repair, key copying, and watch repair are all common services offered together in Chinese neighborhood shops.
- You need to visit both shops, but you should go to the clock/watch shop first for watch repair and then the first shop for shoe repair only, as key copying requires a separate locksmith.
- You need to visit only the clock/watch shop, since that shop is described as a full-service repair center that also handles shoe and key services.
- You need to visit both shops: the first shop for key copying and shoe repair, and the clock/watch shop next door specifically for the watch repair. (correct answer)
Explanation: When listening to descriptions of Chinese neighborhood services, your job is to carefully track which shop offers which service — especially when the speaker contrasts two locations using transitional phrases like 不过 (but/however).
In the passage, the first shop explicitly offers three services: 修鞋 (shoe repair), 配钥匙 (key copying), and 刻章 (seal carving/engraving). The speaker then uses 不过 to signal a contrast — 他们不修表 (they don't fix watches), and directs you to 旁边那家钟表店 (the clock/watch shop next door) for watch repair. Since you need key copying, shoe repair, and watch repair, you must visit both shops: the first for the shoe and key services, the second for the watch. That makes D the correct answer.
A is wrong because it assumes all three services are available at the first shop — but the passage explicitly states that shop does not do watch repair. B contains two errors: it correctly sends you to the clock shop for the watch, but wrongly claims key copying requires a separate locksmith, when 配钥匙 is clearly listed as a first-shop service. C is entirely backwards — the clock/watch shop is described only as a watch repair destination, never as a full-service center for shoes or keys.
A useful strategy: when a passage includes 不过, 但是, or 但 (all meaning "but/however"), treat whatever follows as critical information that corrects or limits what came before. These contrast words are common signals on listening comprehension questions designed to test whether you caught an important exception.
Question 4
A customer walks into a Chinese market and overhears the following exchange between two shoppers:
顾客甲:"这里的猪肉比牛肉便宜多了,不过我更想买羊肉。"
顾客乙:"羊肉在旁边那个摊位,但是今天缺货,你只能买到猪肉或者牛肉。"
顾客甲:"那算了,我去买点豆腐和青菜吧。"
Based on the overheard conversation, which of the following best describes what Customer A (顾客甲) ends up deciding to purchase?
- Customer A decides to buy pork because it is cheaper than beef and lamb is unavailable today at the nearby stall.
- Customer A decides to buy tofu and vegetables instead of any meat, since the lamb is out of stock and neither pork nor beef appeals to them. (correct answer)
- Customer A decides to buy beef because it is considered higher quality than pork, even though lamb is the preferred choice.
- Customer A decides to buy lamb from a different section of the market after learning the nearby stall is out of stock today.
Explanation: When reading a conversational Mandarin passage like this, your goal is to track what each speaker says they will do, not just what they want to do. Pay close attention to how the conversation shifts — desires, obstacles, and final decisions often appear in sequence.
In this exchange, 顾客甲 opens by expressing a preference for lamb (羊肉). 顾客乙 then delivers the key obstacle: the lamb stall is out of stock (缺货), leaving only pork or beef as options. Crucially, 顾客甲 responds with "那算了" — a natural Mandarin expression meaning "forget it" or "never mind" — and pivots entirely, saying they'll buy tofu (豆腐) and vegetables (青菜) instead. This makes B the correct answer: Customer A abandons the meat options altogether and opts for tofu and vegetables.
Choice A is tempting because the passage does mention pork being cheaper than beef, but Customer A never agrees to buy pork — "那算了" signals a full rejection of that option. Choice C fabricates a quality comparison between beef and pork that never appears in the dialogue; no such reasoning is expressed. Choice D contradicts the passage directly — Customer A does not go searching for lamb elsewhere; they give up on it entirely.
A useful strategy here: whenever you see "那算了" or similar pivot phrases like "算了吧" or "那就...", flag them as decision-turning moments. They signal that the speaker is abandoning a previous goal and moving in a new direction — which is almost always what exam questions will test.
Question 5
Your Chinese colleague says: "我昨天去干洗店,把大衣送去干洗了,他们说后天可以取,但是如果要熨烫的话要多等一天。" You want the coat to be both dry-cleaned AND ironed. On which day can you pick it up, assuming your colleague dropped it off yesterday?
- You can pick it up tomorrow, because dry cleaning takes one day and ironing adds another, totaling two days from the drop-off date.
- You can pick it up the day after tomorrow, because that is when the dry cleaning alone is finished, and you can request ironing at pickup.
- You can pick it up in three days from today, because dry cleaning is ready the day after tomorrow (two days from drop-off) and ironing adds one more day. (correct answer)
- You can pick it up in four days from today, since the shop requires two days for dry cleaning and two additional days for ironing services.
Explanation: When a Chinese sentence involves relative time words like 昨天 (yesterday), 后天 (the day after tomorrow), and phrases like "再多等一天" (wait one more day), you need to carefully anchor every time reference to a fixed point — in this case, today.
Your colleague dropped off the coat yesterday. The shop said it would be ready 后天 (the day after tomorrow). But "the day after tomorrow" is spoken from your colleague's perspective on that day — meaning two days after yesterday, which lands on tomorrow relative to today. Wait — let's count carefully: yesterday + 2 days = tomorrow. So dry cleaning alone is done tomorrow. Then, if ironing is requested, you must wait one additional day beyond that, which puts pickup at two days from today, or the day after tomorrow from your perspective. That confirms C is correct: dry cleaning finishes tomorrow (one day from today), plus one more day for ironing = pickup in two days from today.
A is wrong because it miscounts the base timeline — dropping off yesterday and picking up "tomorrow" ignores the two-day dry cleaning window correctly mapped to today.
B is wrong on two counts: it misidentifies when dry cleaning finishes, and incorrectly assumes ironing can be requested at pickup rather than upfront.
D is wrong because it invents a "two-day ironing" requirement that was never stated — the sentence only says one extra day for ironing.
As a strategy, always re-anchor relative time words to today's date when translating spoken Chinese timelines. Draw a quick mental calendar if needed.
Question 6
You hear a Chinese speaker at a pharmacy say: "我想买点感冒药,还有创可贴。另外,我妈让我顺便拿一下她上次开的处方药。" Which of the following correctly categorizes ALL the items this person is trying to obtain?
- Two over-the-counter items (cold medicine and bandages) and one prescription medication that was previously issued, so all three can be obtained at the pharmacy counter during this visit. (correct answer)
- Two over-the-counter items (cold medicine and bandages) and one prescription medication that requires a new doctor's visit before it can be dispensed, meaning the person cannot complete all errands today.
- One over-the-counter item (bandages) and two prescription items (cold medicine and the prior prescription drug), since cold medicines in China typically require a prescription and cannot be freely purchased.
- Three over-the-counter items, since all medications mentioned — cold medicine, bandages, and the previously prescribed drug — can be freely purchased at any Chinese pharmacy without restrictions.
Explanation: When you hear someone describe their pharmacy needs in Mandarin, you need to parse not just vocabulary but also the type of each item being requested — particularly the distinction between 非处方药 (over-the-counter) and 处方药 (prescription medication).
Breaking down the sentence: 感冒药 (cold medicine) and 创可贴 (bandages/adhesive plasters) are both freely available over-the-counter items at Chinese pharmacies — no prescription needed. The third item is described as 她上次开的处方药, which translates to "the prescription medicine that was previously issued for her." The key phrase here is 上次开的 ("previously issued/prescribed"), meaning the prescription already exists — the person just needs to pick it up. This makes A the correct answer: two OTC items plus one already-issued prescription drug, all obtainable in a single visit.
B is wrong because it incorrectly claims the prescription requires a new doctor's visit. The speaker specifically says the prescription was already issued (上次开的), so no new appointment is needed. C is wrong because it misclassifies 感冒药 as a prescription item — standard cold medicine in China is widely sold OTC and does not require a doctor's note. D is wrong because it incorrectly categorizes the 处方药 as OTC; the word 处方 literally means "prescription," so calling it freely purchasable contradicts the language itself.
Your study tip: Pay close attention to time-reference phrases like 上次 ("last time") and 已经 ("already") in pharmacy or medical contexts — they signal whether an action is completed or still pending, which changes the entire practical meaning of the statement.
Question 7
A Chinese friend texts you: "我们去那家新开的火锅店吧,可以自己选涮菜,服务员会帮你换汤底。" Which of the following correctly interprets what the dining experience at this restaurant involves?
- You order from a fixed set menu, and the waiter periodically replaces your soup broth while you choose your own ingredients to cook in the pot.
- You select your own ingredients to cook in the broth, and the waiter can change the soup base for you during the meal if you request it. (correct answer)
- The waiter selects the ingredients based on your preferences and brings a new soup base with each course of the meal automatically.
- You choose your own ingredients to cook, but the soup broth is fixed and cannot be changed; only the waiter's recommended toppings vary.
Explanation: When reading Chinese texts about restaurant experiences, focus on parsing each clause carefully — who does what, and under what conditions. The sentence here has two distinct actions connected by a comma, so identifying the subject of each verb is key.
The message says "可以自己选涮菜" — you can select your own ingredients (涮菜) to cook in the hot pot. Then "服务员会帮你换汤底" — the waiter will help you change the soup base (汤底). The critical word is 换, meaning "to change/swap," and 帮 means "to help/assist," implying this happens upon your request rather than automatically on a schedule.
This confirms B as correct: you choose your own ingredients, and the waiter can change the soup base for you if you ask during the meal. Nothing in the original text suggests it happens automatically or on any fixed schedule.
A is wrong on two counts — the menu is not fixed (you self-select ingredients), and nothing implies the waiter replaces broth on a periodic automatic schedule rather than upon request. C inverts the roles entirely: the waiter does not select ingredients, and there is no mention of automatic broth changes "with each course." This misreads both verbs and their subjects. D contradicts the text directly — 换汤底 explicitly states the soup base can be changed, so claiming it is fixed is the opposite of what the message says.
A useful strategy: in conversational Mandarin comprehension questions, always identify the grammatical subject of each verb. Chinese sentences frequently switch subjects mid-sentence, and confusing who does what is exactly the trap these questions are designed to set.
Question 8
A Chinese speaker says: "这家餐厅的招牌菜是红烧肉,但我听说他们的清蒸鱼也不错,只是价格比较贵。我不太能吃辣,所以麻辣豆腐我就算了。" Which dish is this person most likely to order?
- 红烧肉 (red-braised pork), because it is the restaurant's signature dish and is likely the most reasonably priced item on the menu.
- 清蒸鱼 (steamed fish), because the speaker mentions it favorably and does not cite any personal reason to avoid it despite the higher cost. (correct answer)
- 麻辣豆腐 (spicy tofu), because the speaker only says it is spicy, and the restaurant's reputation suggests it is prepared well enough to try.
- 红烧肉 (red-braised pork), because the speaker explicitly rules out both the fish due to its high price and the tofu due to its spiciness.
Explanation: When listening to a Chinese speaker describe a menu, pay close attention to how they frame each dish — specifically, whether they express personal reservations or simply neutral observations. This question tests your ability to distinguish between factual statements and personal constraints.
The speaker makes three distinct comments: the red-braised pork is the signature dish, the steamed fish is good but expensive, and the spicy tofu is ruled out because they can't eat spicy food. Notice that the speaker never gives a personal reason to avoid the 清蒸鱼 — the only hesitation is price, which the speaker mentions casually with "只是" ("it's just that...") rather than "所以我就算了" ("so I'll skip it"). The phrase "我就算了" appears only for the tofu, signaling a firm personal rejection. For the fish, the speaker's tone remains open and even favorable ("也不错" means "not bad either"), making B the most logical choice.
Choice A is tempting because signature dishes carry prestige, but the speaker never says they want the 红烧肉 — mentioning it as the restaurant's specialty doesn't mean they plan to order it. Choice D incorrectly claims the speaker rules out the fish; the speaker only notes the price, not a personal decision to skip it. Choice C misreads the situation entirely — the speaker explicitly says "我不太能吃辣,所以...我就算了," which is a clear, direct self-exclusion from the spicy tofu.
As a study tip: watch for "所以...就算了" as a reliable signal that a Chinese speaker is definitively ruling something out, versus softer qualifiers like "只是" that leave the door open.
Question 9
You are shopping at a Chinese clothing store. The salesperson says: "这件外套现在打七折,但是如果您办理我们的会员卡,还可以再享受九五折优惠。" If the original price of the coat is 400 yuan, how much would a new member pay?
- 252 yuan, calculated by applying the 30% discount first (400 × 0.7 = 280 yuan) and then applying the additional 5% member discount (280 × 0.95 = 266 yuan), then subtracting the card fee.
- 240 yuan, calculated by combining both discounts into a single step: 400 × 0.7 × 0.5 = 140 yuan is saved, leaving 260 yuan, rounded to the nearest ten.
- 266 yuan, calculated by applying the 70% sale price first (400 × 0.7 = 280 yuan) and then applying the 95% member discount on top (280 × 0.95 = 266 yuan). (correct answer)
- 260 yuan, calculated by adding the two discounts together (30% + 5% = 35% off) and applying a single 65% price to the original cost (400 × 0.65 = 260 yuan).
Explanation: When shopping in China, understanding the discount system (折扣, zhékòu) is essential. Chinese discounts work differently from English ones: "打七折" means you pay 70% of the original price (not 30%), and "九五折" means you pay 95% of the discounted price (not 5% off). When two discounts apply sequentially, you must apply them one after the other — never combine them.
For this problem, the coat's original price is 400 yuan. The sale discount "打七折" gives you: 400×0.7=280 yuan. Then the member card discount "九五折" applies to that new price: 280×0.95=266 yuan. This confirms C is correct — a new member pays 266 yuan.
A gets the sequential logic right but then invents a "card fee" subtraction that appears nowhere in the original sentence, making it a trap for careful readers who second-guess themselves. B makes two errors: it incorrectly treats 九五折 as a 50% discount (confusing 五 "five" with 50%) and then rounds arbitrarily — a complete misreading of the Chinese numeral system in discount context. D adds the two discount percentages together (30% + 5% = 35%), which is mathematically incorrect because sequential percentage discounts cannot be simply summed — the second discount applies to an already-reduced price, not the original.
A helpful memory tip: in Chinese discounts, the number before 折 tells you what fraction of the price you pay. 七折 = pay 70%, 九五折 = pay 95%. Always multiply sequentially, never add the "off" percentages together.