Conversational German Quiz: Yes No Question Word Order
20 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Yes No Question Word OrderQuestion 1 of 20

During a phone conversation, you hear some static and miss part of what your friend said about weekend plans.

You think your friend said 'We could go to the cinema tomorrow, and then we could visit the museum on Sunday.' You want to confirm both activities with one question. Which option correctly forms the yes/no question?

Könnten wir morgen ins Kino gehen und könnten wir Sonntag das Museum besuchen?
Könnten wir morgen ins Kino gehen und Sonntag das Museum besuchen?
Wir könnten morgen ins Kino gehen und könnten wir Sonntag das Museum besuchen?
Wir könnten morgen ins Kino gehen und Sonntag das Museum besuchen?
← Back to quizzes

Conversational German Quiz

Conversational German Quiz: Yes No Question Word Order

Practice Yes No Question Word Order in Conversational German with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Yes No Question Word Order, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Conversational German.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

During a phone conversation, you hear some static and miss part of what your friend said about weekend plans.

You think your friend said 'We could go to the cinema tomorrow, and then we could visit the museum on Sunday.' You want to confirm both activities with one question. Which option correctly forms the yes/no question?

  1. Könnten wir morgen ins Kino gehen und könnten wir Sonntag das Museum besuchen?
  2. Könnten wir morgen ins Kino gehen und Sonntag das Museum besuchen? (correct answer)
  3. Wir könnten morgen ins Kino gehen und könnten wir Sonntag das Museum besuchen?
  4. Wir könnten morgen ins Kino gehen und Sonntag das Museum besuchen?
Explanation: Choice B uses the most natural German construction where the modal verb 'könnten' at the beginning applies to both activities connected by 'und'. Choice A is grammatically possible but unnecessarily repetitive. Choice C mixes statement and question word order. Choice D uses statement word order throughout and isn't a proper yes/no question.

Question 2

Thomas is at a restaurant and notices the waiter seems to have forgotten his order. He wants to politely ask if his food is being prepared.

Which yes/no question demonstrates the most appropriate word order for Thomas's polite inquiry about his order status?

  1. Wird mein Essen gerade in der Küche zubereitet? (correct answer)
  2. Ist mein Essen gerade zubereitet in der Küche?
  3. Mein Essen wird gerade in der Küche zubereitet?
  4. Zubereitet wird mein Essen gerade in der Küche?
Explanation: A is correct because it follows proper yes/no question word order: auxiliary verb (wird) + subject (mein Essen) + adverb (gerade) + prepositional phrase + past participle (zubereitet). B incorrectly places the past participle before the prepositional phrase. C lacks verb-subject inversion, making it a statement with rising intonation rather than a proper question. D uses emphatic word order inappropriate for a polite inquiry.

Question 3

Anna is coordinating a group trip and needs to confirm whether her friends can meet at the train station tomorrow morning.

Which yes/no question best demonstrates appropriate word order for Anna's coordination inquiry?

  1. Könnt ihr morgen früh am Bahnhof euch treffen?
  2. Können wir uns morgen früh am Bahnhof treffen?
  3. Könnt ihr euch morgen früh am Bahnhof treffen? (correct answer)
  4. Können sich euch morgen früh am Bahnhof treffen?
Explanation: C is correct because it uses proper modal verb word order with reflexive pronouns: modal verb (könnt) + subject (ihr) + reflexive pronoun (euch) + time expression + location + infinitive. A places the reflexive pronoun after the location. B changes the subject inappropriately. D uses incorrect reflexive pronoun agreement (sich with euch).

Question 4

During a parent-teacher conference, Mrs. Mueller wants to confirm whether her son has been completing his homework assignments without her constant supervision.

Which yes/no question demonstrates proper educational consultation word order for Mrs. Mueller's inquiry?

  1. Macht mein Sohn seine Hausaufgaben selbstständig ohne meine Hilfe?
  2. Hat mein Sohn seine Hausaufgaben selbstständig ohne meine Hilfe gemacht? (correct answer)
  3. Ist mein Sohn seine Hausaufgaben selbstständig ohne meine Hilfe gemacht?
  4. Wird mein Sohn seine Hausaufgaben selbstständig ohne meine Hilfe machen können?
Explanation: B is correct because it uses perfect tense to indicate ongoing pattern of behavior: hat + subject + object + adverbial phrases + past participle. A uses present tense which doesn't capture the pattern over time. C incorrectly uses 'ist' instead of 'hat' for this transitive verb. D shifts focus to future ability rather than current habits.

Question 5

Lisa is coordinating a book club meeting and wants to confirm whether members have finished reading the assigned chapters before tomorrow's discussion.

Which yes/no question demonstrates appropriate book club coordination word order for Lisa's preparation check?

  1. Lesen Sie die zugewiesenen Kapitel für morgen?
  2. Haben Sie die zugewiesenen Kapitel für die morgige Diskussion gelesen? (correct answer)
  3. Sind die zugewiesenen Kapitel für die morgige Diskussion gelesen worden?
  4. Werden Sie die zugewiesenen Kapitel für die morgige Diskussion gelesen haben?
Explanation: B is correct because it uses perfect tense to confirm completed reading: haben + subject + object + prepositional phrase + past participle. A uses present tense which asks about current activity rather than completion. C uses passive voice which is inappropriate for personal reading activity. D uses future perfect which is unnecessarily complex for this straightforward completion check.

Question 6

Julia is coordinating a charity event and wants to confirm whether volunteers will be able to help with setup early Sunday morning.

Which question uses proper yes/no word order for Julia's volunteer coordination inquiry?

  1. Können Sie am frühen Sonntagmorgen beim Aufbau helfen?
  2. Werden Sie am frühen Sonntagmorgen beim Aufbau helfen können? (correct answer)
  3. Sind Sie am frühen Sonntagmorgen beim Aufbau helfen können?
  4. Haben Sie am frühen Sonntagmorgen beim Aufbau helfen gekonnt?
Explanation: B is correct because it properly combines future tense with modal possibility for future availability: werden + subject + time expression + prepositional phrase + infinitive + modal infinitive. A uses present tense modal which is less appropriate for future commitment. C incorrectly uses 'sind' with modal construction. D uses past perfect which doesn't match the future Sunday context.

Question 7

Lisa is planning a surprise party for her friend and needs to confirm whether the decorations have been delivered without arousing suspicion.

Which question uses correct yes/no word order while maintaining the subtle tone Lisa needs?

  1. Haben die Dekorationen schon heute Morgen geliefert worden?
  2. Sind die Dekorationen heute Morgen schon geliefert worden? (correct answer)
  3. Die Dekorationen sind heute Morgen schon geliefert worden?
  4. Worden sind die Dekorationen heute Morgen schon geliefert?
Explanation: B is correct because passive voice yes/no questions use 'sind' + past participle + 'worden' with proper word order: auxiliary verb + subject + time expression + adverb + past participle + worden. A incorrectly uses 'haben' instead of 'sind' for passive voice. C lacks subject-verb inversion. D places 'worden' at the beginning, creating awkward emphasis inappropriate for subtle inquiry.

Question 8

Dr. Weber is conducting a patient consultation and needs to confirm whether the patient has been taking their prescribed medication consistently.

Which question shows correct medical consultation yes/no word order while maintaining professional tone?

  1. Nehmen Sie Ihre Medikamente regelmäßig seit letzter Woche ein?
  2. Haben Sie seit letzter Woche Ihre Medikamente regelmäßig eingenommen? (correct answer)
  3. Sind Sie seit letzter Woche regelmäßig Ihre Medikamente eingenommen?
  4. Werden Sie seit letzter Woche Ihre Medikamente regelmäßig eingenommen haben?
Explanation: B is correct because it uses proper perfect tense word order for ongoing action: auxiliary verb (haben) + subject + time expression + object + adverb + separable prefix verb (eingenommen). A uses present tense which doesn't capture the ongoing nature since last week. C incorrectly uses 'sind' instead of 'haben' for this transitive verb. D incorrectly mixes future perfect with past time reference.

Question 9

Robert is managing a construction project and needs to confirm whether the electrical work has been completed according to safety regulations before the inspection.

Which question shows correct yes/no word order for Robert's safety compliance confirmation?

  1. Wurden die elektrischen Arbeiten nach den Sicherheitsvorschriften abgeschlossen worden?
  2. Haben die Elektriker die Arbeiten nach den Sicherheitsvorschriften abgeschlossen?
  3. Werden die elektrischen Arbeiten nach den Sicherheitsvorschriften abgeschlossen worden sein?
  4. Sind die elektrischen Arbeiten nach den Sicherheitsvorschriften abgeschlossen worden? (correct answer)
Explanation: When forming yes/no questions in German, you need to match the auxiliary verb with the tense and voice of what you're asking about. Since Robert wants to confirm that electrical work has been completed (a past action with present relevance), you need the present perfect tense in passive voice. The correct structure uses "sind" + past participle + "worden" because electrical work (die elektrischen Arbeiten) is plural and requires the passive voice. Option D correctly asks "Sind die elektrischen Arbeiten nach den Sicherheitsvorschriften abgeschlossen worden?" This follows the perfect word order: auxiliary verb first, then subject, then other elements, with the past participle and "worden" at the end. Option A uses "wurden" (simple past passive) with "worden," which creates a double passive construction that's grammatically incorrect. You can't combine the simple past passive auxiliary with "worden." Option B uses active voice with "haben," asking whether "the electricians completed the work." While grammatically correct, this changes the focus from the work itself to who did it, which doesn't match the context of safety compliance verification. Option C uses future perfect tense ("werden...abgeschlossen worden sein"), asking about work that will have been completed by some future point. This doesn't fit Robert's need to confirm current completion status. Remember: In German yes/no questions, start with the auxiliary verb that matches your intended tense and voice. For completed actions affecting the present, use present perfect (haben/sein + past participle), and for passive voice with plural subjects, "sind" is your go-to auxiliary.

Question 10

During a medical appointment, Dr. Hansen needs to confirm whether her patient has been experiencing the side effects she warned about when prescribing the new medication.

Which yes/no question demonstrates proper medical consultation word order for Dr. Hansen's follow-up inquiry?

  1. Werden Sie seit Beginn der Medikamenteneinnahme Nebenwirkungen bemerkt haben?
  2. Bemerken Sie seit Beginn der Medikamenteneinnahme Nebenwirkungen?
  3. Sind Sie seit Beginn der Medikamenteneinnahme Nebenwirkungen bemerkt?
  4. Haben Sie seit Beginn der Medikamenteneinnahme Nebenwirkungen bemerkt? (correct answer)
Explanation: When asking yes/no questions in German, particularly in formal contexts like medical consultations, you need to choose the right auxiliary verb and ensure proper word order with the finite verb in second position. Option D is correct because it uses "Haben Sie... bemerkt?" (Have you noticed?), which employs the present perfect tense—the standard way to ask about experiences that began in the past and continue to the present. The structure places "haben" (the auxiliary verb) in first position, followed by "Sie" (subject), then the time phrase "seit Beginn der Medikamenteneinnahme," the object "Nebenwirkungen," and finally the past participle "bemerkt" at the end. This follows German's verb-second rule for questions and uses the appropriate tense for ongoing experiences. Option A incorrectly uses future perfect tense ("werden... haben") with "bemerkt haben," which would ask about side effects that will have been completed by some future point—nonsensical in this medical context. Option B uses simple present tense ("Bemerken Sie"), which asks about current, immediate perception rather than ongoing experience since starting medication. Option C attempts to use "sind" with "bemerkt," but "bemerken" forms its perfect tense with "haben," not "sein"—a fundamental auxiliary verb error. For German medical and formal conversations, remember that asking about experiences spanning from past to present requires present perfect tense with "haben" or "sein" depending on the verb, and the past participle always goes to the end of the question.

Question 11

During a cooking class, Chef Rodriguez wants to confirm whether students have properly seasoned their dishes before the final tasting.

Which yes/no question demonstrates appropriate culinary instruction word order for the chef's quality check?

  1. Haben Sie Ihre Gerichte vor dem Servieren richtig gewürzt? (correct answer)
  2. Sind Ihre Gerichte vor dem Servieren richtig gewürzt worden?
  3. Werden Sie Ihre Gerichte vor dem Servieren richtig gewürzt haben?
  4. Würzen Sie Ihre Gerichte vor dem Servieren richtig?
Explanation: A is correct because it uses active perfect tense emphasizing the students' actions: haben + subject + object + prepositional phrase + adverb + past participle. B uses passive voice which de-emphasizes student agency. C uses future perfect which doesn't match the immediate pre-tasting context. D uses present tense which asks about general practice rather than current completion.

Question 12

Paula is organizing a community garden project and needs to confirm whether residents will be available to help with the planting phase next weekend.

Which yes/no question demonstrates correct community organizing word order for Paula's volunteer availability inquiry?

  1. Stehen Sie nächstes Wochenende für die Pflanzarbeiten zur Verfügung?
  2. Sind Sie nächstes Wochenende für die Pflanzarbeiten zur Verfügung gestanden?
  3. Werden Sie nächstes Wochenende für die Pflanzarbeiten zur Verfügung stehen? (correct answer)
  4. Haben Sie nächstes Wochenende für die Pflanzarbeiten zur Verfügung gestehen?
Explanation: When asking about future availability in German, you need to match the verb tense to the time frame and use proper yes/no question word order. The correct answer is C because it uses the future tense ("werden Sie... stehen") to ask about next weekend's availability. The structure follows German yes/no question order: auxiliary verb (werden) + subject (Sie) + time expression (nächstes Wochenende) + prepositional phrase (für die Pflanzarbeiten) + main verb (zur Verfügung stehen). This appropriately inquires about future volunteer availability. Option A uses present tense ("stehen Sie"), which doesn't properly correspond to the future time reference "nächstes Wochenende." While grammatically possible, it's less natural for asking about specific future plans. Option B incorrectly uses past perfect tense ("sind Sie... gestanden"), asking whether someone "had been available" next weekend, which creates a nonsensical time contradiction between past tense and future time expression. Option D uses present perfect tense ("haben Sie... gestehen"), but "gestehen" means "to confess" rather than "to stand/be available." Additionally, the past tense doesn't align with asking about future weekend plans. Study tip: For German questions about future availability or plans, use "werden + infinitive" construction. Remember that "zur Verfügung stehen" (to be available) is a fixed expression, and the verb "stehen" should not be confused with "gestehen" (to confess). Always match your verb tense to the time frame you're discussing.

Question 13

Alex is organizing a surprise birthday party and needs to discreetly confirm whether his friend has made any conflicting plans for Saturday evening.

Which question shows correct yes/no word order for Alex's subtle scheduling inquiry?

  1. Wirst du für Samstagabend schon andere Pläne gemacht haben?
  2. Machst du für Samstagabend schon andere Pläne?
  3. Bist du für Samstagabend schon andere Pläne gemacht?
  4. Hast du für Samstagabend schon andere Pläne gemacht? (correct answer)
Explanation: When asking yes/no questions in German, you need to consider both proper word order and the correct tense for the situation. This question tests your ability to form a polite inquiry about existing plans using the appropriate perfect tense structure. The correct formation here requires the present perfect tense (Perfekt) because Alex is asking about plans that may have already been made in the past but affect the present situation. Answer D follows the proper yes/no question structure: auxiliary verb (hast) + subject (du) + time expression + direct object + past participle (gemacht). This creates the natural flow "Have you already made other plans for Saturday evening?" Answer A uses the future perfect tense (Futur II) with "wirst...gemacht haben," which would mean "Will you have made plans?" This is unnecessarily complex and unnatural for this context. Answer B uses simple present tense "Machst du," asking "Are you making plans?" rather than whether plans already exist. Answer C attempts to use "bist" as the auxiliary verb with "gemacht," but this is grammatically incorrect since "machen" requires "haben" as its auxiliary verb in perfect tenses, not "sein." For future reference, remember that when asking about actions that may have already occurred and continue to affect the present situation, use the present perfect tense. Also, memorize which verbs take "haben" versus "sein" as auxiliaries—most transitive verbs like "machen" use "haben."

Question 14

During a language exchange meeting, Andreas wants to confirm whether his conversation partner has been practicing the grammar structures they discussed in their previous session.

Which question uses proper yes/no word order for Andreas's language learning follow-up?

  1. Übst du die Grammatikstrukturen, die wir besprochen haben, regelmäßig?
  2. Bist du die Grammatikstrukturen, die wir besprochen haben, regelmäßig geübt?
  3. Hast du die Grammatikstrukturen, die wir besprochen haben, regelmäßig geübt? (correct answer)
  4. Wirst du die Grammatikstrukturen, die wir besprochen haben, regelmäßig üben können?
Explanation: When forming yes/no questions in German, you need to consider both the correct auxiliary verb and proper word order. The context here suggests Andreas is asking about completed or ongoing practice, which requires the present perfect tense (Perfekt) formed with an auxiliary verb plus past participle. Answer C is correct because it uses the proper structure for a yes/no question in present perfect: "Hast du... geübt?" The auxiliary verb "hast" (have) appears in second position after being moved to the front for the question, followed by the subject "du," then the object and relative clause, and finally the past participle "geübt" at the end. This perfectly captures the meaning "Have you been practicing the grammar structures we discussed regularly?" Answer A uses present tense "Übst du," which asks about current practice rather than whether practice has been happening over time since their last meeting. While grammatically correct, it doesn't match the context of following up on previous discussions. Answer B incorrectly uses "Bist du... geübt" (are you practiced/experienced), treating "geübt" as an adjective rather than forming the present perfect tense. This creates an awkward, non-standard construction. Answer D uses future tense "Wirst du... üben können" (will you be able to practice), which asks about future ability rather than past/ongoing practice since their previous session. Remember: For yes/no questions about completed actions or ongoing results, use present perfect with "haben" or "sein" plus past participle. The auxiliary verb moves to first position in questions.

Question 15

Marco is coordinating a work project and needs to confirm whether his international colleague will be able to participate in tomorrow's video conference despite the time zone difference.

Which yes/no question demonstrates correct word order for Marco's international scheduling confirmation?

  1. Wird es Ihnen möglich sein, trotz der Zeitverschiebung an der Videokonferenz teilzunehmen? (correct answer)
  2. Können Sie trotz der Zeitverschiebung an der Videokonferenz werden teilnehmen?
  3. Sind Sie trotz der Zeitverschiebung an der Videokonferenz teilnehmen können?
  4. Haben Sie trotz der Zeitverschiebung an der Videokonferenz teilnehmen gekonnt?
Explanation: A is correct because it uses proper future construction with formal possibility: wird + subject + predicate adjective + infinitive clause with 'zu'. B incorrectly combines modal with future auxiliary. C mixes 'sind' with modal infinitive incorrectly. D uses past perfect which doesn't match the future context of tomorrow's conference.

Question 16

You're helping a German exchange student with question formation. They want to ask their host family: 'Do you always eat dinner together on Sundays?' They're confused about where to place the time expressions. Which version demonstrates correct yes/no question word order?

  1. Esst ihr sonntags immer zusammen zu Abend? (correct answer)
  2. Ihr esst sonntags immer zusammen zu Abend?
  3. Sonntags esst ihr immer zusammen zu Abend?
  4. Immer esst ihr sonntags zusammen zu Abend?
Explanation: Choice A correctly places the verb 'esst' first, followed by the subject 'ihr', then the time expressions and other elements. Choice B uses statement word order. Choices C and D place time adverbs at the beginning, which would require verb-second position (statement order), not verb-first position needed for yes/no questions.

Question 17

Your colleague mentions that the meeting might be postponed, but you're not sure you heard correctly. You want to ask 'Has the meeting been postponed?' but you also want to be polite. Which question uses the correct word order while maintaining appropriate formality?

  1. Wurde das Meeting verschoben, wenn ich fragen darf?
  2. Das Meeting wurde verschoben, wenn ich fragen darf?
  3. Ist das Meeting verschoben worden, wenn ich fragen darf? (correct answer)
  4. Das Meeting ist verschoben worden, wenn ich fragen darf?
Explanation: Choice C uses the correct present perfect passive construction with proper yes/no question word order: 'Ist' comes first, followed by the subject, past participle, and auxiliary 'worden'. Choice A uses simple past, which is less appropriate for asking about current status. Choices B and D use statement word order, not question order.

Question 18

A language learner wants to ask their teacher: 'Should we hand in the assignment next week, or should we present it orally?' They're confused about how to structure this either/or yes/no question. Which version uses correct word order?

  1. Sollen wir die Aufgabe nächste Woche abgeben oder wir sollen sie mündlich präsentieren?
  2. Sollen wir die Aufgabe nächste Woche abgeben oder sollen wir sie mündlich präsentieren? (correct answer)
  3. Wir sollen die Aufgabe nächste Woche abgeben oder sollen wir sie mündlich präsentieren?
  4. Sollen wir die Aufgabe nächste Woche abgeben oder mündlich präsentieren?
Explanation: When forming either/or questions in German, you're essentially creating two complete questions connected by "oder." Each part of the question must maintain proper German question word order independently. Answer B is correct because it treats both sides of "oder" as complete questions: "Sollen wir die Aufgabe nächste Woche abgeben oder sollen wir sie mündlich präsentieren?" Both clauses follow the standard German question pattern with the modal verb "sollen" in second position, followed by the subject "wir." Let's examine why the other options fail: Answer A incorrectly uses normal word order (subject-verb) in the second clause: "wir sollen sie mündlich präsentieren." This creates an awkward hybrid that sounds unnatural in German. Answer C starts with a statement rather than a question ("Wir sollen..."), making the first part declarative instead of interrogative. Answer D appears shorter but is actually incomplete—it omits the second "sollen wir," creating a fragment that doesn't properly express the either/or choice between two actions. The key insight is that "oder" in either/or questions connects two independent clauses, each requiring complete question structure. You can't mix question word order in one clause with statement word order in another, nor can you omit essential elements from the second clause. Remember this pattern: when asking either/or questions in German, repeat the question structure on both sides of "oder." This ensures clarity and grammatical correctness, especially when presenting two distinct options that require different actions.

Question 19

A student is learning to form polite questions using subjunctive mood. They want to ask their landlord: 'Would it be okay if I painted the walls, and could I also install some shelves?' Which option shows correct word order for this polite inquiry?

  1. Es wäre in Ordnung, wenn ich die Wände streiche, und ich könnte auch Regale installieren?
  2. Es wäre in Ordnung, wenn ich die Wände streiche, und könnte ich auch Regale installieren?
  3. Wäre es in Ordnung, wenn ich die Wände streiche, und ich könnte auch Regale installieren?
  4. Wäre es in Ordnung, wenn ich die Wände streiche, und könnte ich auch Regale installieren? (correct answer)
Explanation: When forming polite requests in German, you need to master two key elements: subjunctive mood and proper question word order. This question tests both skills simultaneously in a compound sentence structure. The correct answer is D because it properly combines two polite questions using inverted word order. In "Wäre es in Ordnung, wenn ich die Wände streiche," the verb "wäre" (subjunctive of "sein") comes first, followed by the subject "es" - this inversion creates a polite question tone. The second part, "und könnte ich auch Regale installieren," maintains the same inverted structure with "könnte" (subjunctive of "können") preceding the subject "ich." Option A fails because it uses statement word order ("Es wäre...") rather than question inversion, making it sound like a declaration rather than a polite inquiry. Option B mixes structures incorrectly - it starts as a statement but then switches to inverted order in the second clause, creating an inconsistent and awkward tone. Option C begins correctly with question inversion ("Wäre es...") but then reverts to statement order ("ich könnte...") in the second part, again creating inconsistent politeness levels. Remember that polite questions in German require consistent verb-subject inversion throughout compound structures. When you see subjunctive forms like "wäre," "könnte," or "hätte" in questions, always check that the verb comes before the subject in each clause. This consistent inversion maintains the respectful, tentative tone essential for polite requests, especially when asking landlords or other authority figures for permissions.

Question 20

Thomas is at a restaurant and wants to ask the waiter about menu modifications, but he's unsure about the proper question formation.

Thomas wants to ask: 'Can the pasta be prepared without cheese, and can you recommend a good wine?' He needs to be polite but direct. Which option shows correct word order for both requests?

  1. Kann die Pasta ohne Käse zubereitet werden und Sie können einen guten Wein empfehlen?
  2. Die Pasta kann ohne Käse zubereitet werden und können Sie einen guten Wein empfehlen?
  3. Kann die Pasta ohne Käse zubereitet werden und können Sie einen guten Wein empfehlen? (correct answer)
  4. Die Pasta kann ohne Käse zubereitet werden und Sie können einen guten Wein empfehlen?
Explanation: When forming compound questions in German, you need to maintain proper question word order in both parts while connecting them with "und" (and). Each clause that asks a question must follow German interrogative structure independently. Looking at this compound question, you're dealing with two separate requests: a passive construction asking if something can be done, and a direct question asking for a recommendation. Both need to maintain question word order with the verb in second position after the question word or modal verb. Option C correctly structures both parts: "Kann die Pasta ohne Käse zubereitet werden und können Sie einen guten Wein empfehlen?" The first clause uses "kann" (can) in position one, followed by the subject "die Pasta," creating proper question word order. After "und," the second clause maintains independent question structure with "können Sie" (can you), where the modal verb comes first followed by the subject. Option A fails because the second clause "Sie können" uses statement word order instead of question word order. In questions, the verb must come before the subject. Option B incorrectly starts the first clause with the subject "Die Pasta," making it a statement rather than a question. Option D combines both errors: the first clause uses statement word order, and the second clause also places the subject before the verb. Remember that when connecting two questions with "und," each clause must maintain its own question structure independently. Don't let the conjunction fool you into mixing statement and question word order within the same compound sentence.