College Statistics Quiz: Ci For A Mean

20 questions · exam conditions

0:00

Ci For A MeanQuestion 1 of 20

A quality control specialist constructs a 99% confidence interval for the mean weight of cereal boxes, which is found to be (15.8 oz, 16.3 oz). The company's stated net weight is 16 oz. Based only on this interval, which of the following is a valid conclusion regarding a two-sided hypothesis test of $H_0: \mu = 16$ versus $H_a: \mu \neq 16$ ?

The null hypothesis would be rejected at the

\alpha = 0.01

significance level.

The null hypothesis would not be rejected at the

\alpha = 0.01

significance level.

The p-value of the test is less than 0.01.

The sample mean was found to be exactly 16 oz, supporting the null hypothesis.

← Back to quizzes

College Statistics Quiz

College Statistics Quiz: Ci For A Mean

Practice Ci For A Mean in College Statistics with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Ci For A Mean, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for College Statistics.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

The null hypothesis would be rejected at the $\alpha = 0.01$ significance level.
The null hypothesis would not be rejected at the $\alpha = 0.01$ significance level. (correct answer)
The p-value of the test is less than 0.01.
The sample mean was found to be exactly 16 oz, supporting the null hypothesis.

Explanation: A confidence interval contains a range of plausible values for the population parameter. There is a direct correspondence between a two-sided hypothesis test and a confidence interval: if the null value (

\mu_0 = 16

) is contained within the C% confidence interval, then the null hypothesis would not be rejected at the

\alpha = 1 - C/100

significance level. Here, 16 is within the 99% confidence interval (15.8, 16.3). Therefore, we would not reject

H_0: \mu = 16

at the

\alpha = 1 - 0.99 = 0.01

level. This also means the p-value must be greater than 0.01. The sample mean is the center of the interval, (15.8 + 16.3)/2 = 16.05 oz, not 16 oz.

Question 2

A researcher is creating a confidence interval for the mean score on a standardized test where scores can only range from 0 to 100. Which of the following calculated 95% t-intervals is impossible to obtain from any real sample of data, regardless of the sample size or standard deviation?

(-10, 10)
(95, 105)
(102, 112) (correct answer)
(45, 55)

Explanation: The center of a confidence interval is the sample mean,

\bar{x}

. For a test with scores from 0 to 100, any individual score must be in this range, and therefore the mean of any sample of scores,

\bar{x}

, must also be within the range [0, 100]. Let's examine the centers of the given intervals: A) Center = 0, possible. B) Center = 100, possible. C) Center = (102+112)/2 = 107, impossible. D) Center = 50, possible. Since it is impossible to have a sample mean of 107 for data that cannot exceed 100, the interval (102, 112) could not have been generated from a valid sample. While intervals A and B have endpoints outside the [0, 100] range, this is possible if the sample mean is close to a boundary and the margin of error is sufficiently large.

Question 3

A 90% confidence interval for a mean is calculated from a sample of size $n=25$ . If a new sample of size $n=100$ is taken from the same population, and by coincidence the new sample mean and sample standard deviation are identical to those of the first sample, how would the width of the new 90% confidence interval compare to the original interval's width?

The new interval's width would be exactly half the original width.
The new interval's width would be slightly less than half the original width. (correct answer)
The new interval's width would be exactly one-fourth the original width.
The new interval's width would be slightly more than half the original width.

Explanation: The width of a t-interval is

2 \times t^* \times \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}

. Quadrupling the sample size from 25 to 100 makes the

\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}

term half as large (

\frac{1}{\sqrt{100}} = \frac{1}{10}

is half of

\frac{1}{\sqrt{25}} = \frac{1}{5}

). However, the critical value

t^*

also changes because the degrees of freedom increase. For a 90% CI,

t^*

with

df=24

is 1.711. For

df=99

t^*

is 1.660. Since the new

t^*

is smaller, the new width will be

\frac{1.660}{1.711} \approx 0.97

times half the original width. This results in a new interval that is slightly less than half the width of the original.

Question 4

An environmental scientist wants to estimate the mean level of a certain pollutant in a river to within 0.5 parts-per-million (ppm) with 95% confidence. A pilot study of 12 samples yielded a standard deviation of 2.3 ppm. What is the minimum number of additional samples the scientist must take to achieve the desired margin of error?

70 (correct answer)
82
91
69

Explanation: To calculate the required sample size

n

for a given margin of error (ME), we use the formula

n = (\frac{z^* \cdot s}{ME})^2

. We use the z* critical value (1.96 for 95% confidence) as a conservative estimate because the t* value depends on the unknown

n

. We use the standard deviation from the pilot study (s=2.3) as an estimate. Plugging in the values:

n = (\frac{1.96 \times 2.3}{0.5})^2 = (9.016)^2 \approx 81.29

. Since the sample size must be an integer, we must round up to

n=82

to ensure the margin of error is not exceeded. The question asks for the number of additional samples. Since 12 were already taken in the pilot study, the additional number needed is

82 - 12 = 70

Question 5

A 95% confidence interval for a population mean is calculated from a sample of size $n=10$ . The sample standard deviation is $s=5$ . If the population standard deviation $\sigma$ was actually known to be exactly 5, how would a 95% confidence interval calculated using $\sigma$ (a z-interval) compare to the original t-interval?

The interval calculated using $\sigma$ would be narrower. (correct answer)
The interval calculated using $\sigma$ would be wider.
The two intervals would have the exact same width.
The comparison cannot be made without knowing the sample mean.

Explanation: The width of the interval is determined by the critical value. The original t-interval uses a critical value

t^*

from the t-distribution with

n-1=9

degrees of freedom. For 95% confidence,

t^*_{df=9} = 2.262

. An interval calculated with a known

\sigma

would use a critical value

z^*

from the standard normal distribution. For 95% confidence,

z^* = 1.96

. Since

z^*=1.96

is less than

t^*=2.262

, and all other components (s=

\sigma

, n) are the same, the margin of error for the z-interval would be smaller, resulting in a narrower interval. The t-distribution has heavier tails than the normal distribution to account for the extra uncertainty of estimating

\sigma

with s, which always makes

t^* > z^*

for any given confidence level.

Question 6

A 95% confidence interval for a population mean, based on a random sample of size 16, is calculated to be (22.1, 27.9). Assuming all conditions for the t-interval are met, what is the sample standard deviation?

5.92
5.44 (correct answer)
5.47
1.36

Explanation: The sample mean (

\bar{x}

) is the midpoint of the interval:

\bar{x} = (22.1 + 27.9) / 2 = 25.0

. The margin of error (ME) is half the width of the interval:

ME = 27.9 - 25.0 = 2.9

. The formula for the margin of error is

ME = t^* \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}

. For a 95% confidence interval with

n=16

, the degrees of freedom are

df = 16 - 1 = 15

. The critical value

t^*

for df=15 is 2.131. We can solve for the sample standard deviation (s):

2.9 = 2.131 \times \frac{s}{\sqrt{16}}

, which simplifies to

2.9 = 2.131 \times \frac{s}{4}

. Solving for s gives

s = \frac{2.9 \times 4}{2.131} \approx 5.44

Question 7

From the same population, Researcher 1 takes a random sample of size 40 and computes a 95% CI for the mean, getting (11.2, 14.8). Researcher 2 takes an independent random sample of size 60 and computes a 95% CI for the same population mean, getting (13.5, 15.5). Which of the following is the most appropriate conclusion?

The true mean must be in the range (13.5, 14.8), where the two intervals overlap.
Researcher 2's interval is more likely to be correct because it is narrower and based on a larger sample size.
At least one of the researchers must have made a calculation error, as the intervals should be nearly identical.
Both intervals are plausible estimates for the true population mean, and the differences between them are expected due to sampling variability. (correct answer)

Explanation: Random samples from the same population will produce different sample statistics (like mean and standard deviation) and thus different confidence intervals. This is the essence of sampling variability. Both intervals were constructed with a method that is successful 95% of the time in the long run. Neither is definitively 'correct' or 'incorrect'. The fact that they are different is expected. Choice A makes too strong a claim; while the overlap region is highly plausible, the true mean could be in one interval but not the other. Choice B misinterprets the 95% confidence level, which applies to the method for both researchers. Choice C incorrectly dismisses the expected role of random chance in sampling.

Question 8

The distribution of household incomes in a large country is known to be strongly right-skewed. An economist takes a random sample of 40 households and finds that the distribution of the natural logarithm of the incomes, ln(income), is approximately symmetric and mound-shaped. A 95% confidence interval for the mean of the log-transformed incomes is calculated to be (10.5, 10.9). Which of the following is a valid interpretation based on this interval?

A 95% confidence interval for the mean income in the population is approximately ( $e^{10.5}$ , $e^{10.9}$ ).
The t-interval procedure is invalid because the original income data are not normally distributed, despite the sample size being greater than 30.
The confidence interval (10.5, 10.9) can be interpreted as a 95% confidence interval for the mean income in thousands of dollars.
A 95% confidence interval for the median income in the population is approximately ( $e^{10.5}$ , $e^{10.9}$ ). (correct answer)

Explanation: When a transformation (like the natural log) makes the data symmetric, the mean of the transformed data is a good estimate of the median of the transformed data. Therefore, the interval (10.5, 10.9) is a 95% confidence interval for the population median of ln(income). Applying the inverse transformation (exponentiating) to the endpoints gives a confidence interval for the population median of the original variable, income. Choice A is incorrect because the mean of the logs is not the log of the mean (

E[\ln(X)] \neq \ln[E(X)]

). Because the original distribution is right-skewed, the mean income will be greater than the median income.

Question 9

To test a new fuel additive, a researcher measures the gas mileage (in mpg) of 12 cars both before and after the additive is used. The researcher plans to construct a 95% confidence interval to estimate the effectiveness of the additive. Which of the following is the correct parameter for which the confidence interval should be constructed?

The difference in the population mean mileage before and the population mean mileage after ( $\mu_{after} - \mu_{before}$ ) using a two-sample t-interval.
The population mean gas mileage for cars using the additive, based on the 'after' measurements.
The population mean of the paired differences in gas mileage (mileage after - mileage before) for all cars of this type. (correct answer)
The population standard deviation of the paired differences in gas mileage for all cars of this type.

Explanation: This is a paired data design because two measurements (before and after) are taken on each experimental unit (each car). The proper way to analyze paired data is to first calculate the difference for each pair (e.g., mileage_after - mileage_before). Then, a one-sample t-interval is constructed for the mean of these differences. This parameter, the population mean of the paired differences (

\mu_{diff}

), represents the average effect of the additive. A two-sample procedure (A) is incorrect as it assumes the two groups of measurements are independent, which they are not. Analyzing only the 'after' data (B) ignores the baseline comparison. The standard deviation (D) is used in the calculation but is not the parameter being estimated.

Question 10

A researcher calculates a 95% confidence interval for the mean height of a plant species based on a sample of 20 plants. The interval is (30 cm, 38 cm). Later, it is discovered that one plant's height was recorded as 5 cm, but it should have been 25 cm. All other data points were between 28 cm and 40 cm. How will correcting this single data entry error affect the confidence interval?

The new interval will be wider and its center will be higher.
The new interval will be narrower and its center will be higher. (correct answer)
The new interval will be wider and its center will be lower.
The width of the interval will not change, but its center will be higher.

Explanation: The original value of 5 cm was a significant low outlier. Correcting it to 25 cm will have two main effects. First, it will increase the sample mean (

\bar{x}

), shifting the center of the confidence interval to the right (higher). Second, the original outlier would have greatly inflated the sample standard deviation (s). Replacing the outlier with a value closer to the mean will decrease the sample standard deviation. A smaller s results in a smaller margin of error and thus a narrower confidence interval. Therefore, the new interval will be both narrower and centered at a higher value.

Question 11

A study with a sample size of $n=25$ produced a confidence interval with a margin of error of 4.0. The sample standard deviation was $s=10.0$ . What is the approximate confidence level of this interval?

80%
90%
95% (correct answer)
99%

Explanation: First, calculate the standard error of the mean:

SE = s / \sqrt{n} = 10.0 / \sqrt{25} = 10.0 / 5 = 2.0

. The margin of error formula is

ME = t^* \times SE

. We can solve for the critical value

t^*

4.0 = t^* \times 2.0 \Rightarrow t^* = 2.0

. We need to find the confidence level corresponding to a critical value of

t^*=2.0

with degrees of freedom

df = n - 1 = 24

. Looking at a t-distribution table for df=24, a

t^*

of 1.711 corresponds to a 90% confidence level, and a

t^*

of 2.064 corresponds to a 95% confidence level. Since our calculated

t^*

of 2.0 is very close to 2.064, the confidence level is approximately 95%.

Question 12

A researcher wants to construct an 80% confidence interval for a population mean based on a random sample of size $n=18$ . Which of the following is the correct critical value $t^*$ to use?

1.333 (correct answer)
1.330
0.863
1.282

Explanation: For an 80% confidence interval, the total area in the two tails of the t-distribution is

\alpha = 1 - 0.80 = 0.20

. For a two-sided interval, we need the area in each tail to be

\alpha/2 = 0.10

. The degrees of freedom are

df = n - 1 = 18 - 1 = 17

. We need to find the t-value with 17 degrees of freedom that has 0.10 area to its right. Using a t-table or calculator, this value is

t_{0.10, 17} = 1.333

. Choice B uses df=18. Choice C uses a tail area of 0.20 instead of 0.10. Choice D is the z* critical value for 80% confidence.

Question 13

A biologist measures the weights of a random sample of 25 adult squirrels and computes a 90% confidence interval for the mean weight to be (480.5, 519.5) grams. If the weights had been recorded in kilograms instead of grams (1 kg = 1000 g), what would the 90% confidence interval have been?

(0.4805, 0.5195) (correct answer)
(480500, 519500)
(499.98, 500.02)
(0.498, 0.502)

Explanation: When changing units of measurement, all summary statistics based on those units will change by the same conversion factor. To convert from grams to kilograms, we divide by 1000. This applies to the sample mean, the standard deviation, and consequently, the endpoints of the confidence interval. The lower bound becomes

480.5 / 1000 = 0.4805

kg, and the upper bound becomes

519.5 / 1000 = 0.5195

kg. The resulting interval is (0.4805, 0.5195).

Question 14

To estimate the average time students at a large university spend on a new learning module, a professor collects data from all 35 students in her advanced statistics class. She then calculates a 95% t-interval for the mean time. What is the most significant flaw in this statistical procedure?

The sample is not representative of the intended population, making inference to all university students inappropriate. (correct answer)
The sample size (n=35) is large enough that the Central Limit Theorem ensures the interval is valid for the university.
Since the entire class was sampled, this is a census of the class, and a confidence interval for that class is unnecessary.
The population standard deviation is unknown, so a t-interval is not the correct procedure to use.

Explanation: The primary issue is that the sample is a convenience sample, not a random sample from the population of interest (all students at the university). Students in an advanced statistics class are likely not representative of the general student body in terms of study habits, motivation, or background knowledge. Therefore, any inference made from this sample to the entire university population is likely to be biased and invalid. While the CLT (B) might apply to the sampling distribution shape, it does not correct for a biased sampling method. Choice (C) is true for the class, but the goal was to infer to the university. Choice (D) is incorrect; a t-interval is precisely the procedure for when the population standard deviation is unknown.

Question 15

A researcher plans to take two independent random samples from the same large population. Sample A will have 25 observations and Sample B will have 100 observations. Assume the sample standard deviation (s) turns out to be roughly the same for both samples. Which statement best describes the relationship between the expected standard error of the mean (SE) for the two samples?

The standard error for Sample B is expected to be about one-fourth the standard error for Sample A.
The standard error for Sample B is expected to be about half the standard error for Sample A. (correct answer)
The standard error for Sample B is expected to be about twice the standard error for Sample A.
The two samples are expected to have about the same standard error because the sample standard deviations are the same.

Explanation: The formula for the standard error of the mean is

SE = s/\sqrt{n}

. For Sample A,

SE_A = s/\sqrt{25} = s/5

. For Sample B,

SE_B = s/\sqrt{100} = s/10

. Comparing the two,

SE_B = s/10 = (1/2) \times (s/5) = (1/2) \times SE_A

. Thus, the standard error for the larger sample (B) is expected to be half that of the smaller sample (A). Choice A is incorrect because it treats the relationship as

1/n

instead of

1/\sqrt{n}

Question 16

A 99% confidence interval for a population mean is (55.4, 68.6). The sample standard deviation was $s=15.0$ . What was the sample size, $n$ ?

21
35
38 (correct answer)
42

Explanation: First, find the sample mean and margin of error.

\bar{x} = (55.4 + 68.6)/2 = 62.0

ME = 68.6 - 62.0 = 6.6

. The formula is

ME = t^* \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}

, so

6.6 = t^* \frac{15}{\sqrt{n}}

. Since

t^*

depends on

n

, we must iterate or test the answer choices. Let's test

n=38

. If

n=38

, then

df=37

. The

t^*

critical value for 99% confidence with df=37 is approximately 2.715. Let's see if this works:

ME = 2.715 \times \frac{15}{\sqrt{38}} \approx 2.715 \times \frac{15}{6.164} \approx 6.608

. This is extremely close to the given ME of 6.6. Testing the other options: For n=35 (df=34),

t^*=2.728

, ME =

2.728 \times 15/\sqrt{35} \approx 6.91

. For n=21 (df=20),

t^*=2.845

, ME =

2.845 \times 15/\sqrt{21} \approx 9.32

. Thus,

n=38

is the correct sample size.

Question 17

The width of a 95% confidence interval for a population mean, based on a sample of size $n$ , is 10 units. If the study were repeated with a new sample of size $4n$ from the same population and the new sample standard deviation was identical to the first, what would be the approximate width of the new 95% confidence interval?

Exactly 5 units
Slightly less than 5 units (correct answer)
Exactly 2.5 units
Slightly more than 5 units

Explanation: The width of a t-interval is

W = 2 \cdot t^* \cdot \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}

. The new width,

W_{new}

, would be

2 \cdot t^*_{new} \cdot \frac{s}{\sqrt{4n}} = 2 \cdot t^*_{new} \cdot \frac{s}{2\sqrt{n}} = (\frac{t^*_{new}}{t^*_{old}}) \cdot (\frac{W_{old}}{2})

. Increasing the sample size from

n

4n

increases the degrees of freedom. As degrees of freedom increase, the t-distribution gets closer to the normal distribution, and the critical value

t^*

for a fixed confidence level decreases (gets closer to

z^*

). Therefore, the ratio

t^*_{new} / t^*_{old}

will be slightly less than 1. This means the new width will be slightly less than half the old width, or slightly less than 5 units.

Question 18

5.92
5.44 (correct answer)
5.47
1.36

Explanation: The sample mean (

\bar{x}

) is the midpoint of the interval:

\bar{x} = (22.1 + 27.9) / 2 = 25.0

. The margin of error (ME) is half the width of the interval:

ME = 27.9 - 25.0 = 2.9

. The formula for the margin of error is

ME = t^* \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}

. For a 95% confidence interval with

n=16

, the degrees of freedom are

df = 16 - 1 = 15

. The critical value

t^*

for df=15 is 2.131. We can solve for the sample standard deviation (s):

2.9 = 2.131 \times \frac{s}{\sqrt{16}}

, which simplifies to

2.9 = 2.131 \times \frac{s}{4}

. Solving for s gives

s = \frac{2.9 \times 4}{2.131} \approx 5.44

Question 19

(0.4805, 0.5195) (correct answer)
(480500, 519500)
(499.98, 500.02)
(0.498, 0.502)

480.5 / 1000 = 0.4805

kg, and the upper bound becomes

519.5 / 1000 = 0.5195

kg. The resulting interval is (0.4805, 0.5195).

Question 20

A 99% confidence interval for a population mean is (55.4, 68.6). The sample standard deviation was $s=15.0$ . What was the sample size, $n$ ?

21
35
38 (correct answer)
42

Explanation: First, find the sample mean and margin of error.

\bar{x} = (55.4 + 68.6)/2 = 62.0

ME = 68.6 - 62.0 = 6.6

. The formula is

ME = t^* \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}

, so

6.6 = t^* \frac{15}{\sqrt{n}}

. Since

t^*

depends on

n

, we must iterate or test the answer choices. Let's test

n=38

. If

n=38

, then

df=37

. The

t^*

critical value for 99% confidence with df=37 is approximately 2.715. Let's see if this works:

ME = 2.715 \times \frac{15}{\sqrt{38}} \approx 2.715 \times \frac{15}{6.164} \approx 6.608

. This is extremely close to the given ME of 6.6. Testing the other options: For n=35 (df=34),

t^*=2.728

, ME =

2.728 \times 15/\sqrt{35} \approx 6.91

. For n=21 (df=20),

t^*=2.845

, ME =

2.845 \times 15/\sqrt{21} \approx 9.32

. Thus,

n=38

is the correct sample size.