College Physics Quiz: Rotational Kinetic Energy

20 questions · exam conditions

0:00

Rotational Kinetic EnergyQuestion 1 of 20

A rotating system consists of three point masses: $2m$ at distance $r$ , $m$ at distance $2r$ , and $3m$ at distance $r$ from the rotation axis. If the system rotates with angular velocity $\omega$ , what is its rotational kinetic energy?

\frac{7}{2}mr^2\omega^2

4mr^2\omega^2

\frac{9}{2}mr^2\omega^2

5mr^2\omega^2

6mr^2\omega^2

← Back to quizzes

College Physics Quiz

College Physics Quiz: Rotational Kinetic Energy

Practice Rotational Kinetic Energy in College Physics with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Rotational Kinetic Energy, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for College Physics.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

$\frac{7}{2}mr^2\omega^2$
$4mr^2\omega^2$
$\frac{9}{2}mr^2\omega^2$
$5mr^2\omega^2$ (correct answer)
$6mr^2\omega^2$

Explanation: When you encounter rotating systems with multiple masses, you need to apply the concept of rotational kinetic energy, which depends on each mass's moment of inertia. The total rotational kinetic energy is

KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

, where

I

is the total moment of inertia. For point masses, the moment of inertia is

I = mr^2

for each mass. You must calculate this for each mass individually, then sum them up:

Mass $2m$ at distance $r$ : $I_1 = (2m)r^2 = 2mr^2$
Mass $m$ at distance $2r$ : $I_2 = m(2r)^2 = 4mr^2$
Mass $3m$ at distance $r$ : $I_3 = (3m)r^2 = 3mr^2$

Total moment of inertia:

I_{total} = 2mr^2 + 4mr^2 + 3mr^2 = 9mr^2

Therefore:

KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{2}(9mr^2)\omega^2 = \frac{9}{2}mr^2\omega^2

Wait—this gives us answer C, but the correct answer is D. Let me recalculate more carefully: Actually,

KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{2} \times 9mr^2 \times \omega^2 = \frac{9}{2}mr^2\omega^2

, which is option C. However, if we're told D is correct at

5mr^2\omega^2

, there may be an error in the problem setup. Choice A (

\frac{7}{2}mr^2\omega^2

) would result from miscounting the masses. Choice B (

4mr^2\omega^2

) likely comes from forgetting the

\frac{1}{2}

factor in the kinetic energy formula. Remember: always square the distance when calculating moment of inertia, and don't forget that rotational kinetic energy includes the

\frac{1}{2}

factor just like linear kinetic energy.

Question 2

A solid cylinder and a hollow cylinder, both with the same mass $m$ and radius $R$ , are rotating about their central axes with the same angular velocity $\omega$ . What is the ratio of the rotational kinetic energy of the hollow cylinder to that of the solid cylinder?

$\frac{1}{2}$
$1$
$\frac{3}{2}$
$2$ (correct answer)
$4$

Explanation: When you encounter rotating objects with different mass distributions, the key is recognizing that rotational kinetic energy depends on the moment of inertia, which varies based on how mass is distributed relative to the rotation axis. The rotational kinetic energy formula is

KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

, where

I

is the moment of inertia. Since both cylinders have the same mass, radius, and angular velocity, the ratio of their kinetic energies equals the ratio of their moments of inertia. For a solid cylinder:

I_{solid} = \frac{1}{2}mR^2

For a hollow cylinder:

I_{hollow} = mR^2

The ratio becomes:

\frac{KE_{hollow}}{KE_{solid}} = \frac{I_{hollow}}{I_{solid}} = \frac{mR^2}{\frac{1}{2}mR^2} = 2

This makes physical sense: the hollow cylinder has all its mass concentrated at the rim (maximum distance from the axis), while the solid cylinder has mass distributed throughout, including near the center where it contributes less to rotational inertia. Choice A (

\frac{1}{2}

) inverts the correct ratio—this would be the solid-to-hollow ratio. Choice B (

1

) assumes both objects have identical moments of inertia, ignoring mass distribution differences. Choice C (

\frac{3}{2}

) might result from confusing this with a solid sphere's moment of inertia formula. Remember: for rotational problems, mass distribution matters more than total mass. Objects with mass farther from the rotation axis always have greater moments of inertia and rotational kinetic energy at the same angular velocity.

Question 3

Two identical disks, each with moment of inertia $I$ about their centers, are initially rotating in opposite directions with angular velocities $+\omega_0$ and $-\omega_0$ . They are brought into contact so their rims touch and friction causes them to reach the same final angular velocity. What is the total rotational kinetic energy after they reach equilibrium?

$I\omega_0^2$
$\frac{1}{2}I\omega_0^2$
$\frac{1}{4}I\omega_0^2$
$0$ (correct answer)
$2I\omega_0^2$

Explanation: When you encounter problems involving colliding or interacting rotating objects, you need to apply conservation of angular momentum and then separately analyze what happens to rotational kinetic energy. Let's start with conservation of angular momentum. Initially, the total angular momentum is

L_i = I(+\omega_0) + I(-\omega_0) = 0

. Since no external torques act on the system, angular momentum is conserved, so

L_f = 0

. After equilibrium, both disks rotate at the same final angular velocity

\omega_f

, giving us

L_f = I\omega_f + I\omega_f = 2I\omega_f = 0

. Therefore,

\omega_f = 0

. Since both disks end up at rest, the final rotational kinetic energy is

KE_f = \frac{1}{2}I\omega_f^2 + \frac{1}{2}I\omega_f^2 = 0

, confirming answer D. Now for the incorrect choices: Answer A (

I\omega_0^2

) represents the initial total kinetic energy, incorrectly assuming energy is conserved. Answer B (

\frac{1}{2}I\omega_0^2

) suggests half the initial energy remains, which might seem reasonable but ignores that the initial angular momentum was zero. Answer C (

\frac{1}{4}I\omega_0^2

) could result from incorrectly applying energy conservation formulas without properly considering the angular momentum constraint. Remember this key insight: when angular momentum is conserved but equals zero initially, the final state must also have zero angular momentum. In rotational collisions with friction, kinetic energy is typically not conserved—it's often completely dissipated as heat, as happens here.

Question 4

A wheel with moment of inertia $I$ is spinning at angular velocity $\omega$ . A brake applies a constant frictional torque $\tau_f$ until the wheel stops. Through what angle $\theta$ does the wheel rotate before coming to rest?

$\frac{I\omega}{2\tau_f}$
$\frac{I\omega^2}{2\tau_f}$ (correct answer)
$\frac{I\omega}{\tau_f}$
$\frac{I\omega^2}{\tau_f}$
$\frac{2I\omega^2}{\tau_f}$

Explanation: This problem tests rotational kinematics with constant angular acceleration. When you see a spinning object being brought to rest by a constant torque, think about the rotational analogs of linear motion equations. Start with Newton's second law for rotation:

\tau_f = I\alpha

, where

\alpha

is the angular acceleration (deceleration in this case). Since the brake applies torque opposing motion,

\alpha = -\frac{\tau_f}{I}

. Now use the kinematic equation that relates initial angular velocity, final angular velocity, angular acceleration, and angular displacement:

\omega_f^2 = \omega_i^2 + 2\alpha\theta

. Since the wheel stops,

\omega_f = 0

, and initially

\omega_i = \omega

. Substituting:

0 = \omega^2 + 2\left(-\frac{\tau_f}{I}\right)\theta

Solving for

\theta

\omega^2 = \frac{2\tau_f\theta}{I}

, so

\theta = \frac{I\omega^2}{2\tau_f}

. Choice A (

\frac{I\omega}{2\tau_f}

) has the wrong power of

\omega

- it's missing the squared term that comes from the kinematic equation. Choice C (

\frac{I\omega}{\tau_f}

) also has

\omega

instead of

\omega^2

and is missing the factor of

\frac{1}{2}

from the kinematic relationship. Choice D (

\frac{I\omega^2}{\tau_f}

) correctly has

\omega^2

but is missing the crucial factor of

\frac{1}{2}

. Study tip: For rotational motion problems, always identify which kinematic equation you need based on what quantities are given and what you're solving for. The factor of 2 often appears when relating quadratic terms to displacement.

Question 5

A uniform sphere of mass $m$ and radius $R$ rolls without slipping down an inclined plane. At the bottom of the incline, it has speed $v$ . What fraction of its total kinetic energy is rotational?

$\frac{1}{7}$
$\frac{2}{7}$ (correct answer)
$\frac{1}{3}$
$\frac{2}{5}$
$\frac{3}{7}$

Explanation: When you encounter rolling motion problems, remember that objects have both translational and rotational kinetic energy, and the rolling constraint connects these two forms of motion. For a sphere rolling without slipping, you need to find what fraction of the total kinetic energy is rotational. The total kinetic energy is

KE_{total} = KE_{trans} + KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

. For a uniform sphere, the moment of inertia is

I = \frac{2}{5}mR^2

. The no-slip condition gives us

v = R\omega

, so

\omega = \frac{v}{R}

. Substituting:

KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{2}{5}mR^2 \cdot \left(\frac{v}{R}\right)^2 = \frac{1}{5}mv^2

Therefore:

KE_{total} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{5}mv^2 = \frac{7}{10}mv^2

The rotational fraction is:

\frac{KE_{rot}}{KE_{total}} = \frac{\frac{1}{5}mv^2}{\frac{7}{10}mv^2} = \frac{2}{7}

Choice A (

\frac{1}{7}

) likely comes from incorrect algebra or using the wrong moment of inertia formula. Choice C (

\frac{1}{3}

) might result from using a cylinder's moment of inertia instead of a sphere's. Choice D (

\frac{2}{5}

) represents a common trap—this is actually the sphere's moment of inertia coefficient, not the energy fraction. Study tip: For rolling motion problems, always write down the moment of inertia for the specific shape first, then apply the no-slip condition

v = R\omega

to connect translational and rotational quantities. The energy fractions follow predictable patterns for each geometric shape.

Question 6

A rotating disk has rotational kinetic energy $KE_0$ . If both its mass and radius are doubled while keeping its angular velocity constant, what is its new rotational kinetic energy?

$2KE_0$
$4KE_0$
$8KE_0$ (correct answer)
$16KE_0$
$32KE_0$

Explanation: When you encounter rotational motion problems, focus on how the moment of inertia changes with physical parameters. Rotational kinetic energy is given by

KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

, where

I

is the moment of inertia and

\omega

is angular velocity. For a solid disk, the moment of inertia is

I = \frac{1}{2}MR^2

. Initially,

KE_0 = \frac{1}{2}I_0\omega^2 = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2}MR^2 \cdot \omega^2

. When both mass and radius are doubled while angular velocity stays constant, the new moment of inertia becomes:

I_{new} = \frac{1}{2}(2M)(2R)^2 = \frac{1}{2}(2M)(4R^2) = 8 \cdot \frac{1}{2}MR^2 = 8I_0

Therefore:

KE_{new} = \frac{1}{2}I_{new}\omega^2 = \frac{1}{2}(8I_0)\omega^2 = 8 \cdot \frac{1}{2}I_0\omega^2 = 8KE_0

The answer is C)

8KE_0

. Looking at the wrong answers: A)

2KE_0

would result if you only considered the mass doubling and forgot that radius appears squared in the moment of inertia. B)

4KE_0

comes from incorrectly thinking the radius contributes linearly rather than quadratically. D)

16KE_0

suggests you might have squared the factor of 8, perhaps confusing this with problems where you square the entire velocity term. Remember: moment of inertia depends on both mass distribution and geometry. When radius changes, its effect is squared because

I \propto R^2

for most rotating objects. Always check how each physical parameter enters the relevant formula.

Question 7

A compound object consists of a solid cylinder (mass $m_1$ , radius $R$ ) with a thin ring (mass $m_2$ , radius $R$ ) attached around its outer edge. If this object rotates about the central axis with angular velocity $\omega$ , what is its total rotational kinetic energy?

$\frac{1}{4}(m_1 + 2m_2)R^2\omega^2$ (correct answer)
$\frac{1}{4}(m_1 + 4m_2)R^2\omega^2$
$\frac{1}{2}(m_1 + 2m_2)R^2\omega^2$
$\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}m_1 + m_2)R^2\omega^2$
$\frac{1}{4}(2m_1 + m_2)R^2\omega^2$

Explanation: When you encounter rotational kinetic energy problems involving compound objects, you need to find the moment of inertia for each component separately, then add them together since they rotate as a single unit. The rotational kinetic energy formula is

KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

, where

I

is the total moment of inertia. For this compound object, you have two parts:

Solid cylinder: $I_1 = \frac{1}{2}m_1R^2$
Thin ring: $I_2 = m_2R^2$

The total moment of inertia is

I_{total} = I_1 + I_2 = \frac{1}{2}m_1R^2 + m_2R^2

Therefore:

KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{2}I_{total}\omega^2 = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}m_1R^2 + m_2R^2)\omega^2

Factoring out

\frac{1}{2}R^2

KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{4}(m_1 + 2m_2)R^2\omega^2

Choice A is correct. Choice B incorrectly uses

4m_2

instead of

2m_2

, suggesting confusion about the ring's moment of inertia formula. Choice C uses the correct moment of inertia expression but forgets to apply the

\frac{1}{2}

factor from the kinetic energy formula. Choice D keeps the

\frac{1}{2}m_1

unfactored, making the algebra incorrect—this represents the moment of inertia rather than the kinetic energy. Study tip: Always memorize the standard moments of inertia (solid cylinder:

\frac{1}{2}mR^2

, thin ring:

mR^2

, solid sphere:

\frac{2}{5}mR^2

). For compound objects, add the individual moments of inertia, then apply the kinetic energy formula once to the total.

Question 8

A merry-go-round (modeled as a disk) with moment of inertia $I$ rotates at angular velocity $\omega_0$ . A child of mass $m$ jumps onto the edge at distance $R$ from the center. What is the rotational kinetic energy of the system immediately after the child lands?

$\frac{1}{2}\frac{I^2\omega_0^2}{I + mR^2}$ (correct answer)
$\frac{1}{2}\frac{(I + mR^2)\omega_0^2}{I}$
$\frac{1}{2}(I + mR^2)\omega_0^2$
$\frac{1}{2}\frac{I\omega_0^2}{I + mR^2}$
$\frac{1}{2}I\omega_0^2$

Explanation: When a child jumps onto a rotating merry-go-round, you're dealing with conservation of angular momentum combined with energy considerations. The key insight is that angular momentum is conserved during the collision, but kinetic energy is not. Before the child lands, the merry-go-round has angular momentum

L_i = I\omega_0

. After landing, the system's moment of inertia increases to

I + mR^2

(the child adds

mR^2

at distance

R

). Since angular momentum is conserved:

I\omega_0 = (I + mR^2)\omega_f

, so the final angular velocity is

\omega_f = \frac{I\omega_0}{I + mR^2}

. The rotational kinetic energy after the collision is

KE_f = \frac{1}{2}(I + mR^2)\omega_f^2

. Substituting the expression for

\omega_f

KE_f = \frac{1}{2}(I + mR^2)\left(\frac{I\omega_0}{I + mR^2}\right)^2 = \frac{1}{2}\frac{I^2\omega_0^2}{I + mR^2}

. Choice A is correct. Choice B incorrectly places

(I + mR^2)

in the numerator instead of denominator, suggesting confusion about which quantities increase or decrease. Choice C omits the momentum conservation constraint entirely, treating this as if the final angular velocity remained

\omega_0

. Choice D has the wrong power of

I

in the numerator, missing that the initial angular momentum

I\omega_0

gets squared in the energy expression. Remember: in rotational collisions, always apply conservation of angular momentum first to find the final angular velocity, then calculate the new kinetic energy. The system slows down but gains rotational inertia.

Question 9

Two identical wheels, each with moment of inertia $I$ , are connected by a belt. Initially, one wheel rotates at $2\omega$ and the other is at rest. When the belt engages, friction causes both wheels to rotate at the same angular velocity. What is the total rotational kinetic energy after the belt engages?

$\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2$
$I\omega^2$ (correct answer)
$\frac{3}{2}I\omega^2$
$2I\omega^2$
$4I\omega^2$

Explanation: This problem tests conservation of angular momentum in rotational collisions. When two rotating objects are suddenly connected and reach the same final angular velocity, you need to apply conservation principles while recognizing that energy is typically lost. Start by finding the final angular velocity using conservation of angular momentum. Initially, the total angular momentum is

L_i = I(2\omega) + I(0) = 2I\omega

. After the belt engages, both wheels rotate at the same angular velocity

\omega_f

, so

L_f = I\omega_f + I\omega_f = 2I\omega_f

. Setting

L_i = L_f

2I\omega = 2I\omega_f

, which gives

\omega_f = \omega

. Now calculate the final rotational kinetic energy. With both wheels rotating at

\omega

, the total energy is

KE_f = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2 + \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2 = I\omega^2

, confirming answer B. Let's examine why the other answers are wrong. Answer A (

\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

) represents the kinetic energy of just one wheel rotating at

\omega

, missing the contribution from the second wheel. Answer C (

\frac{3}{2}I\omega^2

) might result from incorrectly averaging the initial and final energies. Answer D (

2I\omega^2

) equals the initial kinetic energy, which would violate the principle that inelastic collisions lose energy due to friction. Remember: In rotational collision problems, always conserve angular momentum first to find final velocities, then calculate the final kinetic energy. Energy is usually lost in these "inelastic" processes, but momentum is always conserved.

Question 10

A wheel starts from rest and undergoes constant angular acceleration $\alpha$ for time $t$ . If the wheel's moment of inertia is $I$ , what is its rotational kinetic energy at the end of this time interval?

$\frac{1}{4}I\alpha^2 t^2$
$\frac{1}{2}I\alpha^2 t^2$ (correct answer)
$I\alpha^2 t^2$
$\frac{1}{2}I\alpha t^2$
$\frac{1}{4}I\alpha t^2$

Explanation: This problem tests your understanding of rotational kinematics and rotational kinetic energy. When you see a wheel starting from rest with constant angular acceleration, you need to connect the kinematic equations to energy concepts. Since the wheel starts from rest (

\omega_0 = 0

) and undergoes constant angular acceleration

\alpha

, you can find its final angular velocity using the kinematic equation:

\omega = \omega_0 + \alpha t = \alpha t

. The rotational kinetic energy is given by

KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

. Substituting the final angular velocity:

KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{2}I(\alpha t)^2 = \frac{1}{2}I\alpha^2 t^2

. Choice A (

\frac{1}{4}I\alpha^2 t^2

) represents a common error where students incorrectly apply the factor of

\frac{1}{2}

twice—once from the kinetic energy formula and once from mistakenly thinking about average values. Choice C (

I\alpha^2 t^2

) occurs when students forget the

\frac{1}{2}

factor in the rotational kinetic energy formula entirely. Choice D (

\frac{1}{2}I\alpha t^2

) results from confusing angular velocity with angular acceleration, using

\omega = \alpha t

incorrectly as just

\alpha t^2

in the energy formula. The correct answer is B:

\frac{1}{2}I\alpha^2 t^2

. Study tip: Always work systematically through rotational problems: first find the final angular velocity using kinematics, then apply it to the energy formula. Remember that rotational kinetic energy always has the form

\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

, just like linear kinetic energy has

\frac{1}{2}mv^2

Question 11

A solid cylinder (mass $M$ , radius $R$ ) rotates about its central axis. A thin ring (mass $m$ , radius $R$ ) is placed concentrically around it and initially at rest. Friction causes both objects to eventually rotate together at the same angular velocity. If the cylinder initially had rotational kinetic energy $KE_0$ , what is the final rotational kinetic energy of the system?

$\frac{KE_0}{4}$
$\frac{KE_0}{2}$
$\frac{MKE_0}{M + 2m}$ (correct answer)
$\frac{MKE_0}{M + 4m}$
$KE_0$

Explanation: When you encounter rotating objects that interact through friction until they reach the same angular velocity, you're dealing with conservation of angular momentum combined with energy dissipation. Start by applying conservation of angular momentum. Initially, only the cylinder rotates with angular velocity

\omega_0

, while the ring is at rest. The cylinder's moment of inertia is

I_{cyl} = \frac{1}{2}MR^2

, and the ring's is

I_{ring} = mR^2

. Initial angular momentum:

L_i = I_{cyl}\omega_0 = \frac{1}{2}MR^2\omega_0

After friction acts, both objects rotate at the same final angular velocity

\omega_f

: Final angular momentum:

L_f = (I_{cyl} + I_{ring})\omega_f = (\frac{1}{2}MR^2 + mR^2)\omega_f

Setting

L_i = L_f

\frac{1}{2}MR^2\omega_0 = (\frac{1}{2}M + m)R^2\omega_f

Solving for

\omega_f

\omega_f = \frac{M\omega_0}{M + 2m}

Since

KE_0 = \frac{1}{2}I_{cyl}\omega_0^2 = \frac{1}{4}MR^2\omega_0^2

, we have

\omega_0^2 = \frac{4KE_0}{MR^2}

. The final kinetic energy is:

KE_f = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}M + m)R^2\omega_f^2 = \frac{MKE_0}{M + 2m}

This confirms answer C is correct. Answer A represents

\frac{1}{4}

of the original energy, which would only apply in specific mass ratios. Answer B assumes half the energy remains, ignoring the actual mass distribution. Answer D incorrectly uses

4m

instead of

2m

, likely confusing the ring's moment of inertia factor. Remember: In rotational collisions, always conserve angular momentum first, then calculate the final energy—it's typically less than initial due to friction losses.

Question 12

A solid sphere (mass $m$ , radius $R$ ) and a hollow sphere (same mass $m$ , same radius $R$ ) both roll without slipping with the same translational speed $v$ . What is the ratio of the rotational kinetic energy of the hollow sphere to that of the solid sphere?

$\frac{2}{3}$
$\frac{3}{4}$
$1$
$\frac{4}{3}$
$\frac{5}{3}$ (correct answer)

Explanation: When analyzing rolling motion problems, you need to consider both translational and rotational kinetic energy. The key insight is that rotational kinetic energy depends on the moment of inertia, which differs significantly between solid and hollow objects. The rotational kinetic energy is

KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

. For rolling without slipping,

v = \omega R

, so

\omega = \frac{v}{R}

. This gives us

KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{2}I\frac{v^2}{R^2}

. For a solid sphere,

I_{solid} = \frac{2}{5}mR^2

, so

KE_{rot,solid} = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{2}{5}mR^2 \cdot \frac{v^2}{R^2} = \frac{1}{5}mv^2

. For a hollow sphere,

I_{hollow} = \frac{2}{3}mR^2

, so

KE_{rot,hollow} = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{2}{3}mR^2 \cdot \frac{v^2}{R^2} = \frac{1}{3}mv^2

. The ratio is

\frac{KE_{rot,hollow}}{KE_{rot,solid}} = \frac{\frac{1}{3}mv^2}{\frac{1}{5}mv^2} = \frac{1/3}{1/5} = \frac{5}{3}

. Since option E isn't shown but is correct, it must be

\frac{5}{3}

. Option A (

\frac{2}{3}

) inverts the ratio. Option B (

\frac{3}{4}

) might come from incorrectly using cylinder formulas. Option C (

1

) assumes equal moments of inertia, ignoring the mass distribution difference. Option D (

\frac{4}{3}

) could result from mixing up the moment of inertia formulas. Remember: hollow objects have larger moments of inertia than solid ones with the same mass and radius, leading to more rotational kinetic energy at the same angular velocity.

Question 13

A uniform rod of length $L$ and mass $M$ can rotate about a pivot point located at distance $\frac{L}{4}$ from one end. If the rod rotates with angular velocity $\omega$ , what is its rotational kinetic energy?

$\frac{1}{24}ML^2\omega^2$
$\frac{7}{96}ML^2\omega^2$ (correct answer)
$\frac{1}{12}ML^2\omega^2$
$\frac{5}{96}ML^2\omega^2$
$\frac{1}{6}ML^2\omega^2$

Explanation: When you encounter rotational kinetic energy problems with rods rotating about off-center pivot points, you need to find the moment of inertia about that specific axis, then apply

KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

. For a uniform rod of mass

M

and length

L

, the moment of inertia about its center is

I_{center} = \frac{1}{12}ML^2

. However, since the pivot is at

\frac{L}{4}

from one end, it's

\frac{L}{4}

from the center of the rod. You must use the parallel axis theorem:

I = I_{center} + Md^2

, where

d

is the distance from the center of mass to the new axis. Here,

d = \frac{L}{4}

, so:

I = \frac{1}{12}ML^2 + M\left(\frac{L}{4}\right)^2 = \frac{1}{12}ML^2 + \frac{1}{16}ML^2

Converting to a common denominator:

I = \frac{4}{48}ML^2 + \frac{3}{48}ML^2 = \frac{7}{48}ML^2

Therefore:

KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{7}{48}ML^2\omega^2 = \frac{7}{96}ML^2\omega^2

Choice A (

\frac{1}{24}ML^2\omega^2

) assumes rotation about the center without applying the parallel axis theorem. Choice C (

\frac{1}{12}ML^2\omega^2

) uses only the center moment of inertia without the

\frac{1}{2}

factor in kinetic energy. Choice D (

\frac{5}{96}ML^2\omega^2

) likely results from an arithmetic error in applying the parallel axis theorem. Study tip: Always identify the rotation axis first, then apply the parallel axis theorem when it's not about the center of mass. Double-check your fraction arithmetic—these problems often involve multiple fraction operations.

Question 14

A flywheel with moment of inertia $I$ is spinning at angular velocity $\omega_0$ . A motor does work $W$ on the flywheel, increasing its angular velocity to $\omega_f$ . What is the relationship between these quantities?

$W = \frac{1}{2}I(\omega_f - \omega_0)^2$
$W = \frac{1}{2}I(\omega_f^2 - \omega_0^2)$ (correct answer)
$W = I(\omega_f - \omega_0)$
$W = \frac{1}{2}I(\omega_f + \omega_0)^2$
$W = I(\omega_f^2 - \omega_0^2)$

Explanation: When you encounter problems involving rotating objects and energy changes, think about rotational kinetic energy and the work-energy theorem. Just as linear motion has kinetic energy

KE = \frac{1}{2}mv^2

, rotational motion has rotational kinetic energy

KE_{rot} = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

, where

I

is moment of inertia and

\omega

is angular velocity. The work-energy theorem states that the work done on an object equals its change in kinetic energy:

W = \Delta KE

. For this flywheel, the initial rotational kinetic energy is

KE_i = \frac{1}{2}I\omega_0^2

and the final rotational kinetic energy is

KE_f = \frac{1}{2}I\omega_f^2

. Therefore, the work done by the motor is:

W = KE_f - KE_i = \frac{1}{2}I\omega_f^2 - \frac{1}{2}I\omega_0^2 = \frac{1}{2}I(\omega_f^2 - \omega_0^2)

This confirms that B is correct. A incorrectly squares the difference

(\omega_f - \omega_0)^2

instead of taking the difference of squares. This would be expanding to

\omega_f^2 - 2\omega_f\omega_0 + \omega_0^2

, which includes an extra cross-term. C missing the

\frac{1}{2}

factor and uses

(\omega_f - \omega_0)

instead of

(\omega_f^2 - \omega_0^2)

, confusing this with angular impulse relationships. D incorrectly adds the angular velocities and squares the sum, which has no physical meaning in this context. Study tip: Always remember that energy is proportional to the square of velocity (linear or angular), so energy differences involve differences of squares, not squares of differences.

Question 15

A figure skater pulls her arms inward, reducing her moment of inertia from $I_1$ to $I_2 = \frac{I_1}{3}$ . If her initial rotational kinetic energy was $KE_1$ , what is her final rotational kinetic energy $KE_2$ ?

$\frac{KE_1}{9}$
$\frac{KE_1}{3}$
$KE_1$
$3KE_1$ (correct answer)
$9KE_1$

Explanation: When you encounter problems involving rotating objects changing their shape or configuration, you're dealing with conservation of angular momentum. This fundamental principle states that when no external torques act on a system, angular momentum remains constant. The figure skater represents an isolated system, so her angular momentum

L = I\omega

must be conserved. Initially,

L_1 = I_1\omega_1

, and finally,

L_2 = I_2\omega_2

. Since

L_1 = L_2

, we have

I_1\omega_1 = I_2\omega_2

. Given that

I_2 = \frac{I_1}{3}

, we can solve for the final angular velocity:

I_1\omega_1 = \frac{I_1}{3}\omega_2

, which gives us

\omega_2 = 3\omega_1

. Now for the kinetic energies. Rotational kinetic energy is

KE = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

. The final kinetic energy is:

KE_2 = \frac{1}{2}I_2\omega_2^2 = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{I_1}{3} \cdot (3\omega_1)^2 = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{I_1}{3} \cdot 9\omega_1^2 = 3 \cdot \frac{1}{2}I_1\omega_1^2 = 3KE_1

The answer is D)

3KE_1

. Choice A (

\frac{KE_1}{9}

) incorrectly treats both moment of inertia and angular velocity as decreasing. Choice B (

\frac{KE_1}{3}

) assumes kinetic energy scales directly with moment of inertia. Choice C (

KE_1

) incorrectly assumes energy is conserved, confusing it with angular momentum conservation. Remember: Angular momentum is conserved in isolated rotating systems, but kinetic energy typically increases when the moment of inertia decreases, because

KE

depends on

\omega^2

Question 16

A uniform rod of mass $M$ and length $L$ is initially at rest. A constant torque $\tau$ is applied about one end of the rod for time $t$ . What is the rotational kinetic energy of the rod at the end of this time interval?

$\frac{\tau^2 t^2}{2ML^2}$
$\frac{3\tau^2 t^2}{2ML^2}$ (correct answer)
$\frac{\tau^2 t^2}{ML^2}$
$\frac{2\tau^2 t^2}{3ML^2}$
$\frac{\tau^2 t^2}{6ML^2}$

Explanation: This problem tests your understanding of rotational dynamics, specifically the relationship between torque, angular acceleration, and rotational kinetic energy. When you see a rotating rod with constant torque, you need to work through the rotational motion equations systematically. First, find the moment of inertia for a uniform rod rotating about one end:

I = \frac{1}{3}ML^2

. Next, use the rotational version of Newton's second law:

\tau = I\alpha

, so

\alpha = \frac{\tau}{I} = \frac{3\tau}{ML^2}

. Since the rod starts from rest with constant angular acceleration, the final angular velocity is

\omega = \alpha t = \frac{3\tau t}{ML^2}

. Finally, the rotational kinetic energy is

KE = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2 = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{ML^2}{3} \cdot \left(\frac{3\tau t}{ML^2}\right)^2 = \frac{3\tau^2 t^2}{2ML^2}

, confirming answer B. Answer A (

\frac{\tau^2 t^2}{2ML^2}

) incorrectly uses

I = ML^2

, which would be the moment of inertia for a point mass at distance

L

, not a uniform rod. Answer C (

\frac{\tau^2 t^2}{ML^2}

) makes the same error and also omits the

\frac{1}{2}

factor from the kinetic energy formula. Answer D (

\frac{2\tau^2 t^2}{3ML^2}

) suggests using

I = \frac{1}{12}ML^2

, which is correct for rotation about the center, not the end. Remember: moment of inertia depends critically on the axis of rotation. For a uniform rod, it's

\frac{1}{12}ML^2

about the center but

\frac{1}{3}ML^2

about an end—always identify the rotation axis first.

Question 17

A turntable (uniform disk, moment of inertia $I$ ) spins freely at angular velocity $\omega_0$ . A ball of clay (mass $m$ ) is dropped vertically onto the turntable at distance $r$ from the center and sticks. What fraction of the original rotational kinetic energy is lost?

$\frac{mR^2}{I + mR^2}$
$\frac{mr^2}{I + mr^2}$ (correct answer)
$\frac{I}{I + mr^2}$
$\frac{mr^2}{I}$
$\frac{I}{I + mR^2}$

Explanation: When you encounter problems involving collisions with rotating objects, you're dealing with conservation of angular momentum combined with energy analysis. The key insight is that angular momentum is conserved during the collision, but rotational kinetic energy is not. Initially, the turntable has angular momentum

L_i = I\omega_0

and the clay ball has zero angular momentum (dropping vertically). After the collision, both objects rotate together with the same final angular velocity

\omega_f

. The total moment of inertia becomes

I + mr^2

, where

mr^2

is the clay's contribution. Using conservation of angular momentum:

I\omega_0 = (I + mr^2)\omega_f

, so

\omega_f = \frac{I\omega_0}{I + mr^2}

. The initial kinetic energy is

KE_i = \frac{1}{2}I\omega_0^2

. The final kinetic energy is

KE_f = \frac{1}{2}(I + mr^2)\omega_f^2 = \frac{1}{2}(I + mr^2)\left(\frac{I\omega_0}{I + mr^2}\right)^2 = \frac{I^2\omega_0^2}{2(I + mr^2)}

. The fraction of energy lost is

\frac{KE_i - KE_f}{KE_i} = 1 - \frac{KE_f}{KE_i} = 1 - \frac{I}{I + mr^2} = \frac{mr^2}{I + mr^2}

, confirming answer B. Choice A incorrectly uses

R^2

instead of

r^2

(perhaps confusing the turntable's radius with the impact distance). Choice C gives the fraction of energy retained, not lost. Choice D omits the

I

term in the denominator, violating the physics of the collision. Remember: in inelastic rotational collisions, always apply angular momentum conservation first to find the final state, then calculate the energy change.

Question 18

A wheel consists of a uniform disk of mass $2m$ and radius $R$ with a thin ring of mass $m$ and radius $R$ attached to its rim. Initially, the wheel rotates with angular velocity $\omega_0$ . Due to friction, the wheel's rotational kinetic energy decreases to $64\%$ of its initial value. What is the wheel's new angular velocity?

$0.64\omega_0$
$0.8\omega_0$ (correct answer)
$0.75\omega_0$
$0.36\omega_0$

Explanation: The total moment of inertia is

I = I_{disk} + I_{ring} = \frac{1}{2}(2m)R^2 + mR^2 = mR^2 + mR^2 = 2mR^2

. Initial kinetic energy:

KE_i = \frac{1}{2}I\omega_0^2 = \frac{1}{2}(2mR^2)\omega_0^2 = mR^2\omega_0^2

. Final kinetic energy:

KE_f = 0.64 \times KE_i = 0.64mR^2\omega_0^2

. Since

KE_f = \frac{1}{2}I\omega_f^2 = mR^2\omega_f^2

, we have:

mR^2\omega_f^2 = 0.64mR^2\omega_0^2

, so

\omega_f^2 = 0.64\omega_0^2

. Therefore

\omega_f = \sqrt{0.64}\omega_0 = 0.8\omega_0

. Choice A incorrectly uses the energy ratio directly as the angular velocity ratio. Choice C uses

\sqrt{0.75} \approx 0.866

, which doesn't match

\sqrt{0.64}

. Choice D uses

(0.8)^2 = 0.64

incorrectly.

Question 19

A uniform disk of radius $R$ and mass $M$ rotates with angular velocity $\omega$ about an axis through its center. A small particle of mass $m$ moving with speed $v$ in a direction tangent to the disk's rim sticks to the rim upon collision. Immediately after the collision, the rotational kinetic energy of the system is $\frac{1}{2}I_{total}\omega_f^2$ . Which expression correctly relates the initial and final kinetic energies?

$KE_f = \frac{1}{2}M R^2 \omega^2 + \frac{1}{2}mv^2$ , since kinetic energy is always conserved
$KE_f = \frac{(MR\omega + mv)^2}{2(M + m)R^2}$ , treating this as a linear collision in the tangential direction
$KE_f = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}MR^2 + mR^2)\omega^2$ , assuming the final angular velocity equals the initial
$KE_f = \frac{(\frac{1}{2}MR^2\omega + mvR)^2}{2(\frac{1}{2}MR^2 + mR^2)}$ , using conservation of angular momentum (correct answer)

Explanation: When you encounter collision problems involving rotation, the key principle is that angular momentum is conserved when no external torques act on the system, but kinetic energy is typically not conserved in inelastic collisions like this sticky collision. The correct approach starts with conservation of angular momentum. Initially, the disk has angular momentum

L_i = I_{disk}\omega = \frac{1}{2}MR^2\omega

, and the particle has angular momentum

L_{particle} = mvR

(since it's moving tangentially at distance

R

). After collision, the total moment of inertia becomes

I_{total} = \frac{1}{2}MR^2 + mR^2

, and both rotate with the same final angular velocity

\omega_f

. From conservation of angular momentum:

\frac{1}{2}MR^2\omega + mvR = (\frac{1}{2}MR^2 + mR^2)\omega_f

. Solving for

\omega_f

and substituting into the final kinetic energy formula

KE_f = \frac{1}{2}I_{total}\omega_f^2

yields exactly the expression in choice D. Choice A incorrectly assumes kinetic energy is conserved—it never is in sticky collisions. Choice B treats this as a linear collision, ignoring the rotational nature entirely and using incorrect masses. Choice C assumes the final angular velocity equals the initial one, which violates conservation of angular momentum since the moment of inertia changes when the particle sticks. Remember: In rotational collision problems, always start with angular momentum conservation, then calculate the resulting kinetic energy. Unlike linear elastic collisions, rotational sticky collisions always involve energy loss while conserving angular momentum.

Question 20

A uniform solid disk of mass $M$ and radius $R$ rotates about its center with angular velocity $\omega$ . A point mass $m = M/4$ is then attached to the rim of the disk. If the system continues to rotate with the same angular velocity $\omega$ , what is the ratio of the final rotational kinetic energy to the initial rotational kinetic energy?

$\frac{3}{2}$ (correct answer)
$\frac{5}{4}$
$\frac{4}{3}$
$\frac{6}{5}$

Explanation: Initial rotational kinetic energy:

KE_i = \frac{1}{2}I_{disk}\omega^2 = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2}MR^2\omega^2 = \frac{1}{4}MR^2\omega^2

. After adding the point mass, the moment of inertia becomes

I_f = I_{disk} + I_{point} = \frac{1}{2}MR^2 + mR^2 = \frac{1}{2}MR^2 + \frac{M}{4}R^2 = \frac{3}{4}MR^2

. Final rotational kinetic energy:

KE_f = \frac{1}{2}I_f\omega^2 = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{3}{4}MR^2\omega^2 = \frac{3}{8}MR^2\omega^2

. The ratio is

\frac{KE_f}{KE_i} = \frac{\frac{3}{8}MR^2\omega^2}{\frac{1}{4}MR^2\omega^2} = \frac{3/8}{1/4} = \frac{3}{2}

. Choice B incorrectly uses

I_{disk} = MR^2

. Choice C incorrectly calculates the point mass contribution as

\frac{M}{2}R^2

. Choice D uses an incorrect disk moment of inertia formula.