College Chemistry Quiz: Common Ion Effect
20 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Common Ion EffectQuestion 1 of 20

The KaK_a of acetic acid (CH3COOHCH_3COOH) is 1.8×1051.8 \times 10^{-5}. What is the pH of a solution containing 0.10 M CH3COOHCH_3COOH and 0.15 M CH3COONaCH_3COONa?

4.57
4.74
4.92
5.09
5.26
← Back to quizzes

College Chemistry Quiz

College Chemistry Quiz: Common Ion Effect

Practice Common Ion Effect in College Chemistry with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Common Ion Effect, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for College Chemistry.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

The KaK_a of acetic acid (CH3COOHCH_3COOH) is 1.8×1051.8 \times 10^{-5}. What is the pH of a solution containing 0.10 M CH3COOHCH_3COOH and 0.15 M CH3COONaCH_3COONa?

  1. 4.57
  2. 4.74
  3. 4.92 (correct answer)
  4. 5.09
  5. 5.26
Explanation: When you see a weak acid paired with its conjugate base salt, you're dealing with a buffer system that requires the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation: pH=pKa+log[A][HA]pH = pK_a + \log\frac{[A^-]}{[HA]}. First, calculate the pKapK_a from the given KaK_a: pKa=log(1.8×105)=4.74pK_a = -\log(1.8 \times 10^{-5}) = 4.74. The acetate ion concentration [CH3COO][CH_3COO^-] comes from the complete dissociation of sodium acetate: 0.15 M. The acetic acid concentration [CH3COOH][CH_3COOH] remains essentially 0.10 M since the weak acid barely ionizes in the presence of its conjugate base. Applying Henderson-Hasselbalch: pH=4.74+log0.150.10=4.74+log(1.5)=4.74+0.18=4.92pH = 4.74 + \log\frac{0.15}{0.10} = 4.74 + \log(1.5) = 4.74 + 0.18 = 4.92. This confirms answer C is correct. Answer A (4.57) represents a calculation error where someone might have subtracted the log term instead of adding it. Answer B (4.74) is simply the pKapK_a value, which would only be correct if the acid and base concentrations were equal—a common misconception when students forget to calculate the concentration ratio. Answer D (5.09) likely results from incorrectly flipping the concentration ratio to 0.100.15\frac{0.10}{0.15}, giving a negative log value that's then incorrectly handled. Remember: In Henderson-Hasselbalch problems, always identify which species is the acid and which is the conjugate base, then carefully set up your concentration ratio as [base][acid]\frac{[base]}{[acid]}.

Question 2

A buffer solution contains 0.15 M NH3NH_3 and 0.20 M NH4ClNH_4Cl. The KbK_b for NH3NH_3 is 1.8×1051.8 \times 10^{-5}. If 0.050 mol of HClHCl is added to 1.0 L of this buffer, what happens to the [NH4+][NH_4^+] concentration?

  1. It decreases from 0.20 M to 0.15 M due to neutralization
  2. It increases from 0.20 M to 0.25 M due to acid-base reaction (correct answer)
  3. It remains at 0.20 M because buffers resist pH change
  4. It decreases from 0.20 M to 0.10 M due to hydrolysis
  5. It increases from 0.20 M to 0.30 M due to common-ion effect
Explanation: When you encounter buffer problems involving added acid or base, focus on the stoichiometric reaction that occurs before considering equilibrium effects. Buffers work through acid-base reactions between their components. This buffer contains NH3NH_3 (weak base) and NH4+NH_4^+ (its conjugate acid from NH4ClNH_4Cl). When HClHCl is added, it reacts completely with the weak base: NH3+HClNH4++ClNH_3 + HCl \rightarrow NH_4^+ + Cl^- Starting with 0.15 mol NH3NH_3 and adding 0.050 mol HClHCl, the stoichiometry shows that 0.050 mol of NH3NH_3 is consumed and 0.050 mol of NH4+NH_4^+ is produced. The NH4+NH_4^+ concentration increases from 0.20 M to 0.25 M (0.20 + 0.050 = 0.25 M). Answer B correctly describes this increase from 0.20 M to 0.25 M due to the acid-base reaction. Answer A incorrectly suggests the NH4+NH_4^+ concentration decreases. The added acid converts NH3NH_3 to NH4+NH_4^+, so NH4+NH_4^+ must increase, not decrease. Answer C reflects a common misconception that buffer concentrations don't change. While buffers resist pH change, the individual component concentrations do change when acid or base is added. Answer D suggests an incorrect decrease and mentions hydrolysis, which isn't the primary process occurring here. The dominant reaction is the direct acid-base neutralization. Study tip: In buffer problems with added strong acid or base, always write the neutralization reaction first to track how component concentrations change, then consider equilibrium effects if needed.

Question 3

Consider the equilibrium: Fe3+(aq)+SCN(aq)FeSCN2+(aq)Fe^{3+}(aq) + SCN^-(aq) \rightleftharpoons FeSCN^{2+}(aq). A solution at equilibrium appears red due to the FeSCN2+FeSCN^{2+} complex. If solid KSCNKSCN is added to this solution, what will be observed?

  1. The solution becomes less red because KSCNKSCN dilutes the solution
  2. The solution becomes more red due to increased FeSCN2+FeSCN^{2+} formation (correct answer)
  3. The color remains unchanged because KSCNKSCN doesn't affect the equilibrium
  4. The solution becomes colorless because KSCNKSCN removes Fe3+Fe^{3+}
  5. The solution becomes less red because excess SCNSCN^- shifts equilibrium left
Explanation: When you encounter equilibrium problems involving color changes, think about Le Châtelier's principle: how will the system respond to restore equilibrium when you disturb it? Adding solid KSCNKSCN increases the concentration of SCNSCN^- ions in solution. According to Le Châtelier's principle, the equilibrium will shift to counteract this disturbance by consuming the excess SCNSCN^-. The reaction shifts right, forming more FeSCN2+FeSCN^{2+} complex. Since FeSCN2+FeSCN^{2+} is responsible for the red color, increasing its concentration makes the solution more intensely red. This confirms answer B. Let's examine why the other options are incorrect. Option A suggests dilution causes the color change, but adding solid KSCNKSCN doesn't significantly change the solution volume, and the chemical effect (Le Châtelier's principle) dominates anyway. Option C incorrectly assumes KSCNKSCN won't affect equilibrium, but KSCNKSCN dissociates to provide SCNSCN^-, which is directly involved in the equilibrium reaction. Option D wrongly suggests the solution becomes colorless by removing Fe3+Fe^{3+}, but SCNSCN^- doesn't remove iron ions—it combines with them to form more colored complex. Remember this pattern: when you add a reactant to an equilibrium system, the reaction shifts toward the products to consume the excess reactant. Always identify which species you're adding and trace how the equilibrium responds to restore balance.

Question 4

The KspK_{sp} of BaSO4BaSO_4 is 1.1×10101.1 \times 10^{-10}. What is the solubility of BaSO4BaSO_4 in a solution that is 0.015 M in Na2SO4Na_2SO_4?

  1. 1.0×1051.0 \times 10^{-5} M
  2. 7.3×1097.3 \times 10^{-9} M (correct answer)
  3. 1.5×1081.5 \times 10^{-8} M
  4. 3.3×1063.3 \times 10^{-6} M
  5. 2.2×1082.2 \times 10^{-8} M
Explanation: When you encounter a solubility problem involving a common ion, you're dealing with the common ion effect—where the presence of an ion already in solution suppresses the solubility of a compound containing that same ion. Start by writing the dissolution equilibrium: BaSO4(s)Ba2+(aq)+SO42(aq)BaSO_4(s) \rightleftharpoons Ba^{2+}(aq) + SO_4^{2-}(aq). The KspK_{sp} expression is: Ksp=[Ba2+][SO42]=1.1×1010K_{sp} = [Ba^{2+}][SO_4^{2-}] = 1.1 \times 10^{-10}. Since Na2SO4Na_2SO_4 completely dissociates to give 0.015 M SO42SO_4^{2-}, you already have sulfate ions in solution before any BaSO4BaSO_4 dissolves. Let xx = moles of BaSO4BaSO_4 that dissolve per liter. This produces xx mol/L of Ba2+Ba^{2+} and xx mol/L additional SO42SO_4^{2-}, making the total [SO42]=0.015+x[SO_4^{2-}] = 0.015 + x. Since KspK_{sp} is very small and we have excess sulfate, xx will be much smaller than 0.015, so [SO42]0.015[SO_4^{2-}] \approx 0.015 M. Substituting: 1.1×1010=x×0.0151.1 \times 10^{-10} = x \times 0.015, so x=1.1×10100.015=7.3×109x = \frac{1.1 \times 10^{-10}}{0.015} = 7.3 \times 10^{-9} M. This is answer B. Answer A (1.0×1051.0 \times 10^{-5} M) likely comes from incorrectly taking the square root of KspK_{sp}, ignoring the common ion effect. Answer C (1.5×1081.5 \times 10^{-8} M) might result from calculation errors. Answer D (3.3×1063.3 \times 10^{-6} M) could come from using wrong concentration values. Remember: when a common ion is present, always account for its initial concentration before adding the variable from the dissolving compound.

Question 5

A solution contains 0.20 M NH4ClNH_4Cl and 0.10 M NH3NH_3. The KbK_b for NH3NH_3 is 1.8×1051.8 \times 10^{-5}. If 0.020 mol of solid NaOHNaOH is added to 1.0 L of this buffer solution, what is the final [NH4+][NH_4^+] concentration?

  1. 0.18 M (correct answer)
  2. 0.20 M
  3. 0.22 M
  4. 0.16 M
  5. 0.24 M
Explanation: When you encounter a buffer problem with added strong base, you're dealing with an acid-base equilibrium shift. The key is recognizing that NaOHNaOH will react with the weak acid component (NH4+NH_4^+) in the buffer system. Start by identifying what happens when NaOHNaOH is added. The hydroxide ions react with ammonium ions: NH4++OHNH3+H2ONH_4^+ + OH^- \rightarrow NH_3 + H_2O. Since NaOHNaOH is a strong base, this reaction goes to completion. Initially, you have 0.20 mol of NH4+NH_4^+ and 0.10 mol of NH3NH_3 in 1.0 L. Adding 0.020 mol of NaOHNaOH means 0.020 mol of OHOH^- will consume 0.020 mol of NH4+NH_4^+, converting it to NH3NH_3. After the reaction:
  • NH4+NH_4^+: 0.20 - 0.020 = 0.18 mol
  • NH3NH_3: 0.10 + 0.020 = 0.12 mol
Since the volume remains 1.0 L, [NH4+]=0.18[NH_4^+] = 0.18 M. Choice A (0.18 M) is correct. Choice B (0.20 M) incorrectly assumes no reaction occurred with the added base. Choice C (0.22 M) mistakenly adds the NaOHNaOH moles to the NH4+NH_4^+ concentration instead of subtracting. Choice D (0.16 M) uses an incorrect stoichiometry, perhaps subtracting twice the NaOHNaOH amount. Remember: when strong base is added to a buffer, it always reacts completely with the weak acid component first. Calculate the new moles after this reaction, then find the final concentrations.

Question 6

The equilibrium AgCl(s)Ag+(aq)+Cl(aq)AgCl(s) \rightleftharpoons Ag^+(aq) + Cl^-(aq) has Ksp=1.8×1010K_{sp} = 1.8 \times 10^{-10}. If the [Cl][Cl^-] in solution is maintained at 1.0×1031.0 \times 10^{-3} M by adding NaClNaCl, what is the maximum [Ag+][Ag^+] that can exist in solution?

  1. 1.8×1071.8 \times 10^{-7} M (correct answer)
  2. 1.8×10101.8 \times 10^{-10} M
  3. 1.3×1051.3 \times 10^{-5} M
  4. 1.8×10131.8 \times 10^{-13} M
  5. 4.2×1044.2 \times 10^{-4} M
Explanation: When you encounter a question about solubility equilibrium with a maintained ion concentration, you're dealing with the common ion effect. The key is recognizing that adding NaCl provides excess Cl⁻ ions, which shifts the equilibrium and limits how much AgCl can dissolve. The solubility product expression for this equilibrium is Ksp=[Ag+][Cl]=1.8×1010K_{sp} = [Ag^+][Cl^-] = 1.8 \times 10^{-10}. Since the chloride concentration is maintained at 1.0×1031.0 \times 10^{-3} M by adding NaCl, you can solve directly for the maximum silver ion concentration: [Ag+]=Ksp[Cl]=1.8×10101.0×103=1.8×107 M[Ag^+] = \frac{K_{sp}}{[Cl^-]} = \frac{1.8 \times 10^{-10}}{1.0 \times 10^{-3}} = 1.8 \times 10^{-7} \text{ M} This confirms answer A is correct. Looking at the incorrect options: Answer B (1.8×10101.8 \times 10^{-10} M) represents a common mistake where students confuse the KspK_{sp} value with the ion concentration. Answer C (1.3×1051.3 \times 10^{-5} M) might result from calculation errors or incorrect unit conversions. Answer D (1.8×10131.8 \times 10^{-13} M) could come from mistakenly multiplying the given values instead of dividing, or from mishandling the equilibrium expression. Remember this pattern: when one ion concentration is fixed in a solubility problem, simply rearrange the KspK_{sp} expression to solve for the unknown ion. The common ion effect always reduces solubility compared to pure water, so expect smaller concentrations than you might see without the added salt.

Question 7

The KspK_{sp} of Ca(OH)2Ca(OH)_2 is 5.5×1065.5 \times 10^{-6}. What happens to the solubility of Ca(OH)2Ca(OH)_2 when the solution is buffered at pH 12.0?

  1. Solubility increases because high pH favors dissolution
  2. Solubility decreases due to the common-ion effect from OHOH^- (correct answer)
  3. Solubility remains unchanged because pH doesn't affect KspK_{sp}
  4. Solubility increases because Ca2+Ca^{2+} forms complexes at high pH
  5. Solubility decreases because Ca(OH)2Ca(OH)_2 decomposes at high pH
Explanation: When you encounter questions about solubility and pH, you need to consider how added ions affect the equilibrium. This question tests your understanding of the common-ion effect in the context of solubility equilibria. Calcium hydroxide dissolves according to: Ca(OH)2(s)Ca2+(aq)+2OH(aq)Ca(OH)_2(s) \rightleftharpoons Ca^{2+}(aq) + 2OH^-(aq). At pH 12.0, the [OH]=102M=0.01M[OH^-] = 10^{-2} M = 0.01 M. This high concentration of hydroxide ions from the buffer creates a common-ion effect. By Le Châtelier's principle, when you increase the concentration of a product (OHOH^-), the equilibrium shifts left toward the solid, decreasing the amount of Ca(OH)2Ca(OH)_2 that can dissolve. The buffer maintains this high [OH][OH^-], keeping solubility suppressed. Answer B correctly identifies this common-ion effect. Answer A incorrectly suggests high pH increases solubility. While high pH means more OHOH^- ions are present, this actually decreases Ca(OH)2Ca(OH)_2 solubility due to the common-ion effect. Answer C is wrong because although KspK_{sp} itself doesn't change with pH, the actual solubility does change when pH affects the concentration of constituent ions. Answer D incorrectly claims complex formation occurs - Ca2+Ca^{2+} doesn't typically form significant complexes at high pH that would increase solubility. Remember: whenever a buffer or added solution contains an ion that's also a product of your dissolution reaction, expect the common-ion effect to decrease solubility. This is a frequent test concept that combines equilibrium principles with practical applications.

Question 8

A solution is prepared by mixing 50.0 mL of 0.20 M CH3COOHCH_3COOH with 30.0 mL of 0.15 M CH3COONaCH_3COONa. What is the [CH3COOH][CH_3COOH] in the final solution?

  1. 0.125 M (correct answer)
  2. 0.113 M
  3. 0.200 M
  4. 0.175 M
  5. 0.150 M
Explanation: When you're mixing two solutions, you need to find the final concentration by considering both the moles of each substance and the new total volume. This is a dilution problem combined with solution mixing. First, calculate the moles of CH3COOHCH_3COOH: (0.0500 L)(0.20 M) = 0.0100 mol. The CH3COONaCH_3COONa doesn't affect the amount of acetic acid present—it's a separate compound that will create a buffer system, but the acetic acid molecules themselves remain unchanged. Next, find the total final volume: 50.0 mL + 30.0 mL = 80.0 mL = 0.0800 L. Now you can calculate the final concentration of CH3COOHCH_3COOH: 0.0100 mol0.0800 L=0.125 M\frac{0.0100 \text{ mol}}{0.0800 \text{ L}} = 0.125 \text{ M} Looking at the wrong answers: B) 0.113 M likely comes from an error in volume conversion or arithmetic. C) 0.200 M is the original concentration of the acetic acid—this would be wrong because it ignores the dilution effect of adding the sodium acetate solution. D) 0.175 M might result from incorrectly averaging the two original concentrations without considering the different volumes. The key insight is that A) 0.125 M correctly accounts for the simple dilution of acetic acid when the sodium acetate solution is added. Study tip: In solution mixing problems, always track moles of each species separately, then divide by the total final volume. Don't be distracted by the chemical relationship between the compounds—focus on the math of dilution first.

Question 9

The KspK_{sp} of Zn(OH)2Zn(OH)_2 is 3.0×10173.0 \times 10^{-17}. In a solution where [OH]=1.0×104[OH^-] = 1.0 \times 10^{-4} M, what is the equilibrium concentration of Zn2+Zn^{2+}?

  1. 3.0×1093.0 \times 10^{-9} M (correct answer)
  2. 3.0×10133.0 \times 10^{-13} M
  3. 1.7×1061.7 \times 10^{-6} M
  4. 5.5×1075.5 \times 10^{-7} M
  5. 3.0×10173.0 \times 10^{-17} M
Explanation: When you encounter solubility equilibrium problems, you need to write the dissolution equation and set up the KspK_{sp} expression. For zinc hydroxide: Zn(OH)2(s)Zn2+(aq)+2OH(aq)Zn(OH)_2(s) \rightleftharpoons Zn^{2+}(aq) + 2OH^-(aq) The KspK_{sp} expression is: Ksp=[Zn2+][OH]2K_{sp} = [Zn^{2+}][OH^-]^2 Since you're given both Ksp=3.0×1017K_{sp} = 3.0 \times 10^{-17} and [OH]=1.0×104[OH^-] = 1.0 \times 10^{-4} M, you can solve directly for [Zn2+][Zn^{2+}]: 3.0×1017=[Zn2+](1.0×104)23.0 \times 10^{-17} = [Zn^{2+}](1.0 \times 10^{-4})^2 3.0×1017=[Zn2+](1.0×108)3.0 \times 10^{-17} = [Zn^{2+}](1.0 \times 10^{-8}) [Zn2+]=3.0×10171.0×108=3.0×109[Zn^{2+}] = \frac{3.0 \times 10^{-17}}{1.0 \times 10^{-8}} = 3.0 \times 10^{-9} M This matches answer A. Looking at the wrong answers: B (3.0×10133.0 \times 10^{-13} M) results from forgetting to square the hydroxide concentration—using [OH][OH^-] instead of [OH]2[OH^-]^2. C (1.7×1061.7 \times 10^{-6} M) comes from taking the square root of the correct answer, perhaps confusing this with ICE table problems. D (5.5×1075.5 \times 10^{-7} M) appears to involve calculation errors in the exponent manipulation. Study tip: Always write the balanced dissolution equation first to get the correct stoichiometry in your KspK_{sp} expression. The coefficient becomes the exponent—here, the "2" in Zn(OH)2Zn(OH)_2 means [OH]2[OH^-]^2 in the expression. Double-check that you're squaring concentrations when the formula contains subscripts greater than 1.

Question 10

A buffer solution contains 0.25 M HCOOHHCOOH (formic acid) and 0.35 M HCOONaHCOONa. The KaK_a for formic acid is 1.8×1041.8 \times 10^{-4}. What is the percent ionization of HCOOHHCOOH in this buffer?

  1. 0.072%
  2. 0.13%
  3. 0.051% (correct answer)
  4. 0.18%
  5. 0.26%
Explanation: When you encounter a buffer problem asking for percent ionization, you're dealing with the equilibrium between a weak acid and its conjugate base. The key insight is that buffers significantly suppress the ionization of the weak acid compared to what it would be in pure solution. To find the percent ionization, you first need the [H+][H^+] concentration using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation or the KaK_a expression. Since this is a buffer, use: Ka=[H+][A][HA]K_a = \frac{[H^+][A^-]}{[HA]} Here, [A]=0.35 M[A^-] = 0.35 \text{ M} (from HCOONaHCOONa) and [HA]=0.25 M[HA] = 0.25 \text{ M} (HCOOHHCOOH). Solving: 1.8×104=[H+](0.35)0.251.8 \times 10^{-4} = \frac{[H^+](0.35)}{0.25} [H+]=1.8×104×0.250.35=1.29×104 M[H^+] = \frac{1.8 \times 10^{-4} \times 0.25}{0.35} = 1.29 \times 10^{-4} \text{ M} Percent ionization = [H+][initial acid]×100%=1.29×1040.25×100%=0.051%\frac{[H^+]}{[\text{initial acid}]} \times 100\% = \frac{1.29 \times 10^{-4}}{0.25} \times 100\% = 0.051\% This confirms answer C. A) 0.072% likely results from using the wrong concentration ratio or calculation error. B) 0.13% might come from forgetting to account for the buffer effect and treating this like a simple weak acid problem. D) 0.18% could result from incorrectly using the KaK_a value directly without proper equilibrium calculations. Study tip: In buffer problems, always remember that the conjugate base suppresses ionization dramatically. The percent ionization will be much lower than for the weak acid alone.

Question 11

The KspK_{sp} of PbI2PbI_2 is 9.8×1099.8 \times 10^{-9}. A solution is prepared by mixing equal volumes of 0.10 M Pb(NO3)2Pb(NO_3)_2 and 0.20 M KIKI. Will a precipitate form?

  1. No precipitate forms because the solution is diluted
  2. A precipitate forms because Q>KspQ > K_{sp} (correct answer)
  3. No precipitate forms because Q<KspQ < K_{sp}
  4. A precipitate forms due to the common-ion effect
  5. No precipitate forms because Pb(NO3)2Pb(NO_3)_2 is insoluble
Explanation: When you encounter precipitation problems, you need to compare the reaction quotient (Q) to the solubility product constant (K_sp) to predict whether a solid will form. First, determine the concentrations after mixing. Since equal volumes are mixed, both solutions are diluted by half: [Pb²⁺] = 0.050 M and [I⁻] = 0.10 M. For the equilibrium PbI2(s)Pb2+(aq)+2I(aq)PbI_2(s) \rightleftharpoons Pb^{2+}(aq) + 2I^-(aq), calculate Q using the same expression as K_sp: Q=[Pb2+][I]2=(0.050)(0.10)2=5.0×104Q = [Pb^{2+}][I^-]^2 = (0.050)(0.10)^2 = 5.0 \times 10^{-4} Since Q = 5.0×1045.0 \times 10^{-4} and K_sp = 9.8×1099.8 \times 10^{-9}, we have Q > K_sp, meaning the solution is supersaturated and a precipitate will form. Choice A is wrong because dilution doesn't prevent precipitation—what matters is whether the diluted concentrations still exceed the solubility limit. Choice C incorrectly states that Q < K_sp, but our calculation shows Q is much larger than K_sp. Choice D mentions the common-ion effect, which describes how adding an ion already present in equilibrium affects solubility, but this isn't the primary reason precipitation occurs here—it's simply that the ion concentrations exceed the solubility limit. Remember: always calculate Q after accounting for dilution effects, then compare to K_sp. If Q > K_sp, precipitation occurs; if Q < K_sp, the solution remains unsaturated.

Question 12

A solution contains 0.040 M H2SH_2S and 0.15 M HSHS^-. Given that Ka1K_{a1} for H2SH_2S is 9.5×1089.5 \times 10^{-8}, what is the [H+][H^+] in this solution?

  1. 2.5×1082.5 \times 10^{-8} M (correct answer)
  2. 9.5×1089.5 \times 10^{-8} M
  3. 1.3×1071.3 \times 10^{-7} M
  4. 3.6×1083.6 \times 10^{-8} M
  5. 6.3×1096.3 \times 10^{-9} M
Explanation: When you encounter a problem with both a weak acid and its conjugate base present in solution, you're dealing with a buffer system. The key insight is to use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation or directly apply the acid dissociation expression. For the first dissociation of H2SH_2S: H2SH++HSH_2S \rightleftharpoons H^+ + HS^- The equilibrium expression is: Ka1=[H+][HS][H2S]K_{a1} = \frac{[H^+][HS^-]}{[H_2S]} Since you're given concentrations of both H2SH_2S (0.040 M) and HSHS^- (0.15 M), you can solve directly for [H+][H^+]: 9.5×108=[H+](0.15)(0.040)9.5 \times 10^{-8} = \frac{[H^+](0.15)}{(0.040)} [H+]=(9.5×108)(0.040)0.15=2.5×108 M[H^+] = \frac{(9.5 \times 10^{-8})(0.040)}{0.15} = 2.5 \times 10^{-8} \text{ M} This confirms answer A is correct. Answer B (9.5×1089.5 \times 10^{-8} M) represents the common mistake of confusing [H+][H^+] with Ka1K_{a1} itself. Answer C (1.3×1071.3 \times 10^{-7} M) likely comes from incorrectly flipping the concentration ratio in the calculation. Answer D (3.6×1083.6 \times 10^{-8} M) appears to result from arithmetic errors in the setup. Remember: in buffer problems, the [H+][H^+] depends on both the KaK_a value and the ratio of conjugate base to acid concentrations. Always set up the equilibrium expression carefully and substitute the given concentrations directly.

Question 13

In a solution containing 0.10 M NH4+NH_4^+ and 0.25 M NH3NH_3, the equilibrium NH4+(aq)NH3(aq)+H+(aq)NH_4^+(aq) \rightleftharpoons NH_3(aq) + H^+(aq) is established. If the KaK_a for NH4+NH_4^+ is 5.6×10105.6 \times 10^{-10}, what effect does the common NH3NH_3 have on the [H+][H^+]?

  1. [H+][H^+] increases because more NH3NH_3 is present
  2. [H+][H^+] decreases due to the common-ion effect (correct answer)
  3. [H+][H^+] is unaffected because KaK_a is constant
  4. [H+][H^+] increases due to Le Châtelier's principle
  5. [H+][H^+] decreases because NH3NH_3 neutralizes H+H^+
Explanation: When you encounter a question about equilibrium with ions that appear in multiple species, you're dealing with the common-ion effect. This fundamental principle explains how the presence of a shared ion shifts equilibrium position. The correct answer is B because NH3NH_3 acts as a common ion that shifts the equilibrium leftward. Using the equilibrium expression Ka=[NH3][H+][NH4+]K_a = \frac{[NH_3][H^+]}{[NH_4^+]}, we can solve for [H+][H^+]: [H+]=Ka×[NH4+][NH3]=5.6×1010×0.100.25=2.24×1010M[H^+] = K_a \times \frac{[NH_4^+]}{[NH_3]} = 5.6 \times 10^{-10} \times \frac{0.10}{0.25} = 2.24 \times 10^{-10} M. If no NH3NH_3 were initially present, [H+][H^+] would be much higher. The excess NH3NH_3 suppresses the dissociation of NH4+NH_4^+, reducing [H+][H^+]. Choice A incorrectly suggests that more NH3NH_3 increases [H+][H^+], but Le Châtelier's principle tells us that adding products shifts equilibrium toward reactants, decreasing [H+][H^+]. Choice C misunderstands equilibrium constants—while KaK_a remains constant, the equilibrium position shifts based on concentrations, affecting [H+][H^+]. Choice D incorrectly applies Le Châtelier's principle; adding NH3NH_3 (a product) shifts equilibrium left, decreasing [H+][H^+], not increasing it. Remember: whenever you see an equilibrium problem with "common" ions present from the start, think common-ion effect. The shared ion will always suppress the equilibrium, reducing the concentration of products that would form without it.

Question 14

A saturated solution of silver chloride (AgClAgCl) has a solubility product constant Ksp=1.8×1010K_{sp} = 1.8 \times 10^{-10} at 25°C. If 0.10 M NaClNaCl is added to this saturated solution, what happens to the concentration of Ag+Ag^+ ions?

  1. It increases because more salt is added to the solution
  2. It decreases due to the common-ion effect from ClCl^- ions (correct answer)
  3. It remains unchanged because NaClNaCl is a different compound
  4. It increases because NaClNaCl increases the ionic strength
  5. It decreases because NaClNaCl forms a complex with Ag+Ag^+
Explanation: This question tests your understanding of the common-ion effect and solubility equilibrium. When you see a problem involving a saturated solution and the addition of a compound containing a common ion, think about Le Châtelier's principle and how the equilibrium will shift. For AgClAgCl, the equilibrium is: AgCl(s)Ag(aq)++Cl(aq)AgCl_{(s)} \rightleftharpoons Ag^+_{(aq)} + Cl^-_{(aq)} with Ksp=[Ag+][Cl]=1.8×1010K_{sp} = [Ag^+][Cl^-] = 1.8 \times 10^{-10}. When you add NaClNaCl, it completely dissociates to provide additional ClCl^- ions. This increases the [Cl][Cl^-] concentration, which means to maintain the constant KspK_{sp} value, the [Ag+][Ag^+] concentration must decrease. The equilibrium shifts left, causing some Ag+Ag^+ ions to combine with the excess ClCl^- ions and precipitate as solid AgClAgCl. Option A is incorrect because adding salt doesn't automatically increase all ion concentrations—equilibrium considerations matter. Option C shows a fundamental misunderstanding; even though NaClNaCl is different from AgClAgCl, they share the common ClCl^- ion, which directly affects the equilibrium. Option D incorrectly suggests that ionic strength effects would dominate over the common-ion effect, but the common-ion effect is the primary factor here. Remember: whenever you add a compound containing an ion that's already present in an equilibrium system, expect the common-ion effect to shift the equilibrium away from producing more of that ion. This is a key concept in solubility problems.

Question 15

A weak base BB has Kb=5.6×106K_b = 5.6 \times 10^{-6}. In a solution containing 0.15 M BB and 0.25 M of its conjugate acid BH+ClBH^+Cl^-, what is the [OH][OH^-] concentration?

  1. 3.4×1063.4 \times 10^{-6} M (correct answer)
  2. 5.6×1065.6 \times 10^{-6} M
  3. 9.3×1069.3 \times 10^{-6} M
  4. 1.4×1051.4 \times 10^{-5} M
  5. 2.4×1072.4 \times 10^{-7} M
Explanation: When you encounter a weak base in the presence of its conjugate acid, you're dealing with a buffer system that requires the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation or the base equilibrium expression. Since you have both the weak base BB and its conjugate acid BH+BH^+, use the base equilibrium expression: Kb=[BH+][OH][B]K_b = \frac{[BH^+][OH^-]}{[B]}. Rearranging to solve for [OH][OH^-]: [OH]=Kb×[B][BH+][OH^-] = K_b \times \frac{[B]}{[BH^+]}. Substituting the given values: [OH]=5.6×106×0.150.25=5.6×106×0.60=3.4×106[OH^-] = 5.6 \times 10^{-6} \times \frac{0.15}{0.25} = 5.6 \times 10^{-6} \times 0.60 = 3.4 \times 10^{-6} M. Looking at the wrong answers: Choice B (5.6×1065.6 \times 10^{-6} M) represents a common error where students use just the KbK_b value without accounting for the concentration ratio—this would only be correct if [B]=[BH+][B] = [BH^+]. Choice C (9.3×1069.3 \times 10^{-6} M) likely results from incorrectly flipping the concentration ratio, calculating Kb×[BH+][B]K_b \times \frac{[BH^+]}{[B]} instead. Choice D (1.4×1051.4 \times 10^{-5} M) might come from arithmetic errors or misapplying equilibrium expressions. Remember that in buffer problems, the [OH][OH^-] depends on both the KbK_b and the ratio of base to conjugate acid concentrations. When [B]<[BH+][B] < [BH^+], expect [OH][OH^-] to be less than KbK_b, and when [B]>[BH+][B] > [BH^+], expect [OH][OH^-] to be greater than KbK_b.

Question 16

A saturated solution of CaF2CaF_2 has [Ca2+]=2.1×104[Ca^{2+}] = 2.1 \times 10^{-4} M. If this solution is mixed with an equal volume of 0.20 M NaFNaF, what happens immediately after mixing (before any precipitation)?

  1. The solution remains saturated because mixing doesn't change KspK_{sp}
  2. The solution becomes unsaturated because dilution reduces all concentrations
  3. The solution becomes supersaturated due to the common-ion effect (correct answer)
  4. The Ca2+Ca^{2+} concentration increases to maintain equilibrium
  5. The solution reaches a new equilibrium with higher [F][F^-]
Explanation: When you encounter problems involving saturated solutions and mixing, focus on how the reaction quotient (Q) compares to the solubility product constant (KspK_{sp}) after the mixing occurs. First, let's determine what happens to concentrations when equal volumes are mixed. Both the Ca2+Ca^{2+} concentration and the added FF^- concentration are halved due to dilution. After mixing: [Ca2+]=1.05×104[Ca^{2+}] = 1.05 \times 10^{-4} M and [F]=0.10[F^-] = 0.10 M (from the NaFNaF). The original saturated solution had [Ca2+]=2.1×104[Ca^{2+}] = 2.1 \times 10^{-4} M, which means [F]=4.2×104[F^-] = 4.2 \times 10^{-4} M (since CaF2CaF_2 produces 2 fluoride ions per calcium ion). This gives us Ksp=(2.1×104)(4.2×104)2=3.7×1011K_{sp} = (2.1 \times 10^{-4})(4.2 \times 10^{-4})^2 = 3.7 \times 10^{-11}. Now calculate the reaction quotient after mixing: Q=[Ca2+][F]2=(1.05×104)(0.10)2=1.05×106Q = [Ca^{2+}][F^-]^2 = (1.05 \times 10^{-4})(0.10)^2 = 1.05 \times 10^{-6}. Since Q>KspQ > K_{sp}, the solution becomes supersaturated and precipitation will occur. Choice A is wrong because while KspK_{sp} doesn't change, the ion concentrations do, affecting whether equilibrium is maintained. Choice B incorrectly focuses only on dilution while ignoring the massive increase in FF^- concentration from NaFNaF. Choice D is wrong because Ca2+Ca^{2+} concentration will actually decrease as precipitation removes excess ions. Remember: when a common ion is added to a saturated solution, compare the new Q value to KspK_{sp} to predict precipitation, not just whether concentrations increased or decreased.

Question 17

Consider the weak acid equilibrium: HNO2(aq)H+(aq)+NO2(aq)HNO_2(aq) \rightleftharpoons H^+(aq) + NO_2^-(aq) with Ka=4.5×104K_a = 4.5 \times 10^{-4}. In a solution containing both HNO2HNO_2 and NaNO2NaNO_2, which factor primarily determines the [H+][H^+] concentration?

  1. The absolute concentration of HNO2HNO_2 only
  2. The ratio [HNO2][NO2]\frac{[HNO_2]}{[NO_2^-]} and the KaK_a value (correct answer)
  3. The total ionic strength of the solution
  4. The absolute concentration of NO2NO_2^- only
  5. The temperature and pressure of the system
Explanation: When you encounter a question about buffer systems or weak acid/base equilibria with both the weak acid and its conjugate base present, you're dealing with the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation and Le Châtelier's principle. The correct answer is B because the [H+][H^+] concentration in this buffer system is governed by the acid dissociation expression: Ka=[H+][NO2][HNO2]K_a = \frac{[H^+][NO_2^-]}{[HNO_2]}. Rearranging this gives [H+]=Ka×[HNO2][NO2][H^+] = K_a \times \frac{[HNO_2]}{[NO_2^-]}. This shows that the hydrogen ion concentration depends on both the KaK_a value (which is constant at a given temperature) and the ratio of the weak acid to its conjugate base concentrations. Option A is wrong because the absolute concentration of HNO2HNO_2 alone doesn't determine [H+][H^+]. You need to know how much conjugate base is also present to suppress the acid's dissociation through the common ion effect. Option C is incorrect because ionic strength affects activity coefficients in very concentrated solutions, but it's not the primary factor determining [H+][H^+] in typical buffer calculations. Option D fails for the same reason as A—the absolute concentration of NO2NO_2^- alone isn't sufficient. The equilibrium position depends on the relative amounts of both species. Study tip: For any buffer system, remember that [H+][H^+] always depends on the ratio of weak acid to conjugate base, not their individual concentrations. This ratio concept is the foundation of buffer calculations and pH control.

Question 18

A solution contains both Ca2+Ca^{2+} and Mg2+Mg^{2+} ions, each at 0.010 M concentration. If Na2CO3Na_2CO_3 is slowly added to this solution, which carbonate will precipitate first? (KspK_{sp} values: CaCO3=3.4×109CaCO_3 = 3.4 \times 10^{-9}, MgCO3=6.8×106MgCO_3 = 6.8 \times 10^{-6})

  1. MgCO3MgCO_3 precipitates first because it has a larger KspK_{sp}
  2. CaCO3CaCO_3 precipitates first because it has a smaller KspK_{sp} (correct answer)
  3. Both precipitate simultaneously because [Ca2+]=[Mg2+][Ca^{2+}] = [Mg^{2+}]
  4. MgCO3MgCO_3 precipitates first due to the common-ion effect
  5. Neither precipitates because both are soluble carbonates
Explanation: When you encounter selective precipitation problems, the key is determining which compound will reach its solubility limit first as the precipitating agent is gradually added. This happens when the ion product (Q) first equals the solubility product constant (KspK_{sp}). For both carbonates, precipitation begins when Q=Ksp=[M2+][CO32]Q = K_{sp} = [M^{2+}][CO_3^{2-}], where M represents Ca or Mg. Since both metal ions have identical concentrations (0.010 M), you can solve for the carbonate concentration needed to start each precipitation: For CaCO3CaCO_3: [CO32]=Ksp[Ca2+]=3.4×1090.010=3.4×107[CO_3^{2-}] = \frac{K_{sp}}{[Ca^{2+}]} = \frac{3.4 \times 10^{-9}}{0.010} = 3.4 \times 10^{-7} M For MgCO3MgCO_3: [CO32]=Ksp[Mg2+]=6.8×1060.010=6.8×104[CO_3^{2-}] = \frac{K_{sp}}{[Mg^{2+}]} = \frac{6.8 \times 10^{-6}}{0.010} = 6.8 \times 10^{-4} M CaCO3CaCO_3 requires much less carbonate ion to begin precipitating, so it precipitates first. Answer B is correct. Answer A incorrectly assumes larger KspK_{sp} means earlier precipitation, but the opposite is true—smaller KspK_{sp} indicates lower solubility. Answer C ignores that different KspK_{sp} values create different precipitation thresholds despite equal metal ion concentrations. Answer D misapplies the common-ion effect, which isn't relevant here since we're comparing initial precipitation points. Remember: In selective precipitation, calculate the precipitating agent concentration needed for each compound. The one requiring the lowest concentration precipitates first, regardless of which has the larger KspK_{sp}.

Question 19

In which of the following solutions would CaCO3CaCO_3 have the LOWEST solubility?

  1. Pure water
  2. 0.10 M NaClNaCl solution
  3. 0.10 M CaCl2CaCl_2 solution
  4. 0.10 M Na2CO3Na_2CO_3 solution (correct answer)
  5. 0.10 M KNO3KNO_3 solution
Explanation: When you encounter solubility questions involving ionic compounds, think about the common ion effect and Le Châtelier's principle. The solubility of an ionic compound decreases when you add a solution containing one of its constituent ions. Calcium carbonate dissolves according to: CaCO3(s)Ca2+(aq)+CO32(aq)CaCO_3(s) \rightleftharpoons Ca^{2+}(aq) + CO_3^{2-}(aq) According to Le Châtelier's principle, adding either Ca2+Ca^{2+} or CO32CO_3^{2-} ions will shift this equilibrium to the left, reducing solubility. The solution with Na2CO3Na_2CO_3 (choice D) provides CO32CO_3^{2-} ions that suppress the dissolution of CaCO3CaCO_3 through this common ion effect, making it the correct answer. Let's examine why the other options don't reduce solubility as much. Choice A (pure water) has no common ions, so CaCO3CaCO_3 dissolves to its normal extent. Choice B (NaClNaCl) contains Na+Na^+ and ClCl^- ions, which don't appear in the dissolution equation, so they don't significantly affect solubility through the common ion effect. Choice C (CaCl2CaCl_2) does provide Ca2+Ca^{2+} ions, which would reduce solubility somewhat, but the effect is less pronounced than with Na2CO3Na_2CO_3 because CO32CO_3^{2-} is a divalent anion that has a stronger influence on the equilibrium. Study tip: For solubility problems, always write the dissolution equation first, then identify which solution contains a common ion. The solution with the highest concentration of common ions will show the lowest solubility.

Question 20

The KspK_{sp} of CuSCuS is 6.0×10376.0 \times 10^{-37}. In a solution buffered to maintain [S2]=1.0×1015[S^{2-}] = 1.0 \times 10^{-15} M, what is the maximum [Cu2+][Cu^{2+}] that can exist without precipitation?

  1. 6.0×10226.0 \times 10^{-22} M (correct answer)
  2. 6.0×10376.0 \times 10^{-37} M
  3. 2.4×10112.4 \times 10^{-11} M
  4. 7.7×10197.7 \times 10^{-19} M
  5. 1.0×10151.0 \times 10^{-15} M
Explanation: This question tests your understanding of solubility equilibria and how to use the solubility product constant (KspK_{sp}) to determine maximum ion concentrations before precipitation occurs. When dealing with sparingly soluble salts like CuS, precipitation begins when the ion product exceeds KspK_{sp}. For CuS, the equilibrium expression is: Ksp=[Cu2+][S2]=6.0×1037K_{sp} = [Cu^{2+}][S^{2-}] = 6.0 \times 10^{-37} Since the sulfide concentration is buffered at [S2]=1.0×1015[S^{2-}] = 1.0 \times 10^{-15} M, you can solve for the maximum copper concentration by rearranging the KspK_{sp} expression: [Cu2+]=Ksp[S2]=6.0×10371.0×1015=6.0×1022[Cu^{2+}] = \frac{K_{sp}}{[S^{2-}]} = \frac{6.0 \times 10^{-37}}{1.0 \times 10^{-15}} = 6.0 \times 10^{-22} M This confirms answer A is correct. Looking at the wrong answers: Answer B (6.0×10376.0 \times 10^{-37}) represents a common mistake of confusing KspK_{sp} with the ion concentration itself. Answer C (2.4×10112.4 \times 10^{-11}) likely comes from incorrectly taking the square root of KspK_{sp}, as if both ion concentrations were equal. Answer D (7.7×10197.7 \times 10^{-19}) appears to involve calculation errors or misplaced decimal points. Strategy tip: When solving KspK_{sp} problems, always write the equilibrium expression first, then substitute known values and solve for the unknown. Remember that KspK_{sp} represents the maximum ion product before precipitation—any higher concentration will cause the salt to precipitate out of solution.