Business Calculus Quiz: Interpreting And Checking Answers
19 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Interpreting And Checking AnswersQuestion 1 of 19

A business calculates that the present value of a 5-year investment with annual returns of $15,000 and discount rate 6% is $PV = 15000 \cdot \frac{1-(1.06)^{-5}}{0.06} \approx \63,197 . A colleague questions whether this seems reasonable for an investment totaling $75,000 in nominal payments. How should the business verify their answer?

Recalculate the annuity formula step-by-step: (1.06)50.7473(1.06)^{-5} \approx 0.7473, so 10.74730.064.2124\frac{1-0.7473}{0.06} \approx 4.2124, giving PV15000×4.2124=$63,186PV \approx 15000 \times 4.2124 = \$63,186
Compare to individual present values: 150001.06+15000(1.06)2+...+15000(1.06)5\frac{15000}{1.06} + \frac{15000}{(1.06)^2} + ... + \frac{15000}{(1.06)^5} should sum to approximately $63,197
Confirm the discount rate of 6% annually is appropriate for the investment risk level, then validate that receiving $63,197 today equals receiving $75,000 over five years
Verify that $63,197 < $75,000 makes economic sense since future money is worth less than present money, and check that the 16% discount reflects reasonable time value
← Back to quizzes

Business Calculus Quiz

Business Calculus Quiz: Interpreting And Checking Answers

Practice Interpreting And Checking Answers in Business Calculus with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Interpreting And Checking Answers, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Business Calculus.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A business calculates that the present value of a 5-year investment with annual returns of $15,000 and discount rate 6% is $PV = 15000 \cdot \frac{1-(1.06)^{-5}}{0.06} \approx \63,197 . A colleague questions whether this seems reasonable for an investment totaling $75,000 in nominal payments. How should the business verify their answer?

  1. Recalculate the annuity formula step-by-step: (1.06)50.7473(1.06)^{-5} \approx 0.7473, so 10.74730.064.2124\frac{1-0.7473}{0.06} \approx 4.2124, giving PV15000×4.2124=$63,186PV \approx 15000 \times 4.2124 = \$63,186
  2. Compare to individual present values: 150001.06+15000(1.06)2+...+15000(1.06)5\frac{15000}{1.06} + \frac{15000}{(1.06)^2} + ... + \frac{15000}{(1.06)^5} should sum to approximately $63,197
  3. Confirm the discount rate of 6% annually is appropriate for the investment risk level, then validate that receiving $63,197 today equals receiving $75,000 over five years
  4. Verify that $63,197 < $75,000 makes economic sense since future money is worth less than present money, and check that the 16% discount reflects reasonable time value (correct answer)
Explanation: When evaluating present value calculations, you need to verify both the mathematical accuracy and the economic reasonableness of your results. Present value represents what future cash flows are worth in today's dollars, accounting for the time value of money. The correct approach is D because it validates the fundamental economic principle that money received in the future is worth less than money received today. The calculation shows 63,197<63,197 < 75,000, which makes intuitive sense—you should expect the present value to be lower than the sum of nominal future payments when using a positive discount rate. The 16% difference (75,00075,000 - 63,197 = 11,803,orabout1611,803, or about 16% of 75,000) represents a reasonable discount for receiving money over 5 years at a 6% annual rate. Option A simply recalculates the same formula without questioning whether the approach or assumptions are correct. While mathematical verification is useful, it doesn't address whether the methodology is appropriate. Option B also just provides an alternative calculation method (individual present values versus annuity formula) but doesn't validate the economic logic or assumptions. Option C focuses on validating the discount rate, which is important, but misses the key insight about comparing present and future values. The phrase "receiving 63,197todayequalsreceiving63,197 today equals receiving 75,000 over five years" actually restates the calculation rather than verifying its reasonableness. Remember: always perform a "sanity check" on present value problems by confirming that PV < total future payments and that the discount magnitude seems reasonable given the time period and interest rate.

Question 2

A student analyzing population growth uses the model P(t)=50001+49e0.1tP(t) = \frac{5000}{1 + 49e^{-0.1t}} and calculates that the population reaches 2500 when t=0t = 0. They conclude this means the population was 2500 at the start of the study. What should they check to verify this interpretation?

  1. Substitute t=0t = 0 into the equation: P(0)=50001+49e0=500050=100P(0) = \frac{5000}{1 + 49e^0} = \frac{5000}{50} = 100, revealing a calculation error in their original work (correct answer)
  2. Verify that 2500 represents exactly half the carrying capacity of 5000, which occurs at the inflection point of the logistic curve where growth rate is maximized
  3. Check whether their solution t=0t = 0 came from correctly solving 50001+49e0.1t=2500\frac{5000}{1 + 49e^{-0.1t}} = 2500, which should yield t=ln(49)0.138.7t = \frac{\ln(49)}{0.1} \approx 38.7
  4. Confirm that the initial population P(0)=100P(0) = 100 makes sense for their context, then recognize that P(t)=2500P(t) = 2500 occurs much later in the growth process
Explanation: The student made a fundamental error. When t = 0, P(0) = 5000/(1 + 49×1) = 5000/50 = 100, not 2500. They should first check their basic substitution before interpreting results. The population of 2500 occurs when t ≈ 38.7, not at t = 0. Choice B correctly identifies when P = 2500 occurs but doesn't address the calculation error. Choice C checks the algebra but assumes they were solving for when P = 2500. Choice D focuses on contextual reasonableness but misses the arithmetic mistake.

Question 3

A manufacturer's profit function is P(x)=0.01x2+80x5000P(x) = -0.01x^2 + 80x - 5000, where xx is the number of units produced. Due to production capacity, the manufacturer can produce at most 3,000 units. A manager uses calculus to find the production level that maximizes profit and finds a critical point at x=4000x = 4000. What is the most reasonable conclusion?

  1. The model is flawed because the critical point at x=4000x = 4000 is not achievable within the production constraints.
  2. The company should invest in expanding its capacity to produce 4,000 units to achieve the theoretical maximum profit.
  3. The maximum profit within the allowed production range occurs at the endpoint, a production level of 3,000 units. (correct answer)
  4. There is no production level that maximizes profit within the given constraints because the critical point is out of range.
Explanation: The function P(x)P(x) is a downward-opening parabola, so its vertex at x=4000x=4000 is a maximum. However, this is outside the feasible domain of [0,3000][0, 3000]. For a continuous function on a closed interval, the absolute maximum must occur at either a critical point within the interval or at an endpoint. Since there are no critical points in the interval, the maximum must be at an endpoint. Because P(x)=0.02x+80P'(x) = -0.02x + 80 is positive for all xx in [0,3000][0, 3000], the function is increasing on this interval, so the maximum value must occur at the right endpoint, x=3000x=3000.

Question 4

The demand function for a product is q=D(p)q = D(p), where pp is the price per unit. At the current price of $20, the price elasticity of demand is calculated to be $E(20) = -1.5$. Based on this result, which of the following is the most reasonable interpretation for a strategy aimed at increasing revenue?

  1. Demand is inelastic, so a small increase in price would likely lead to an increase in total revenue.
  2. Revenue is already maximized at the current price of $20 because elasticity is not equal to -1.
  3. The calculation must be incorrect because price elasticity of demand cannot be negative.
  4. Demand is elastic, so a small decrease in price would likely lead to an increase in total revenue. (correct answer)
Explanation: Price elasticity of demand E(p)E(p) measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded to a change in price. When E(p)>1|E(p)| > 1, demand is considered elastic. In this case, 1.5=1.5>1|-1.5| = 1.5 > 1, so demand is elastic. For elastic demand, a price decrease leads to a proportionally larger increase in quantity demanded, resulting in an overall increase in total revenue.

Question 5

The profit, P(q)P(q), from producing qq units of a new electronic device is modeled by a function where the second derivative is constant: P(q)=5P''(q) = -5 for all q>0q > 0. Which of the following is the most accurate interpretation of this condition?

  1. The total profit is decreasing for all levels of production, indicating an unprofitable venture.
  2. The profit function has a relative minimum value but no relative maximum value.
  3. The rate of change of profit is constant, meaning profit grows linearly.
  4. The marginal profit is decreasing at a constant rate, indicating diminishing returns for each additional unit produced. (correct answer)
Explanation: The second derivative, P(q)P''(q), represents the rate of change of the first derivative, P(q)P'(q). In this context, P(q)P'(q) is the marginal profit. A constant negative second derivative, P(q)=5P''(q) = -5, means that the marginal profit P(q)P'(q) is decreasing at a constant rate of 5 for each additional unit. This is a classic example of diminishing marginal returns.

Question 6

For a certain manufacturing process, the average cost per unit, Cˉ(q)\bar{C}(q), and the marginal cost, C(q)C'(q), are calculated at a production level of q=1000q = 1000. The results are \bar{C}(1000) = \75andandC'(1000) = $60$. What is the most reasonable interpretation of these figures?

  1. Since marginal cost is positive, the total cost of production is increasing, which will cause the average cost to also increase.
  2. Since marginal cost is below average cost, producing one more unit will cause the average cost per unit to decrease. (correct answer)
  3. The average cost is higher than the marginal cost, which means the production process is inefficient and should be changed.
  4. To minimize the average cost, the company should reduce production, as the current average cost of $75 is too high.
Explanation: The relationship between marginal and average cost dictates the behavior of the average cost function. If the cost of producing the next item (marginal cost) is less than the current average cost, then producing that next item will pull the average down. Therefore, since C(1000)<Cˉ(1000)C'(1000) < \bar{C}(1000), the average cost function is decreasing at q=1000q=1000.

Question 7

A consultant analyzes a company's production and finds that at the current output level of 2,000 units per week, the marginal revenue is $35 per unit and the marginal cost is $42 per unit. The consultant recommends that the company increase its weekly production. Is this recommendation consistent with the principles of profit maximization?

  1. Yes, because as long as marginal revenue is positive, increasing production will increase total revenue and therefore increase profit.
  2. No, because to maximize profit, the company needs to operate at a point where marginal cost is zero.
  3. Yes, because the high marginal cost indicates strong demand for the product, so increasing production is justified.
  4. No, because marginal cost exceeds marginal revenue, so producing an additional unit would decrease total profit. (correct answer)
Explanation: Profit is maximized when marginal revenue equals marginal cost (MR=MCMR=MC). If MC>MRMC > MR, as is the case here (42>3542 > 35), the cost of producing one more unit is greater than the revenue it generates. This means that profit is lost on each additional unit. To increase profit, the company should decrease production until MR=MCMR=MC.

Question 8

The rate of an oil leak from a tanker is given by L(t)=1000t+1L'(t) = \frac{1000}{t+1} barrels per hour, where tt is the time in hours since the leak began. A technician needs to estimate the total oil spilled in the first 3 hours and calculates L(3)=250L'(3) = 250 barrels per hour, then multiplies by 3 hours to conclude that 750 barrels have leaked. Why is this conclusion and methodology incorrect?

  1. The conclusion is incorrect because the total leakage must be found by calculating the definite integral 03L(t)dt\int_{0}^{3} L'(t) dt. (correct answer)
  2. The methodology is flawed because it uses the rate at the end of the period; it should use the initial rate, L(0)L'(0), instead.
  3. The conclusion is an overestimate because the rate of the leak is decreasing over time, so the average rate is lower than 250.
  4. The methodology is flawed because it does not account for the acceleration of the leak, which is given by L(t)L''(t).
Explanation: The technician's method of multiplying the rate at t=3t=3 by the total time assumes a constant rate of leakage. However, the rate function L(t)L'(t) is not constant. To find the total accumulation from a variable rate, one must compute the definite integral of the rate function over the time interval. The correct calculation is 031000t+1dt\int_{0}^{3} \frac{1000}{t+1} dt. The technician's answer of 750 is an underestimate, not an overestimate, because the leak rate was much higher at the beginning of the interval.

Question 9

An accountant is calculating the present value of a continuous income stream of $50,000 per year for 10 years. Using an annual interest rate of $r=0.04$ compounded continuously, they arrive at an answer of $515,640. Without performing the full calculation, what is the most immediate check on the reasonableness of this result?

  1. The result is reasonable because continuous compounding increases the value of money over time, so the present value should be higher than the total nominal income.
  2. The result is unreasonable because the interest rate is low; a low discount rate should lead to a much smaller present value compared to the nominal payments.
  3. The result is unreasonable because the present value must be less than the total undiscounted income stream, which is $50,000 \times 10 = $500,000, making $515,640 impossible. (correct answer)
  4. The result is reasonable, as it correctly accounts for the time value of money, which makes future earnings more valuable in today's dollars than their face value.
Explanation: Present value is the current worth of a future stream of income. Because money in the future is worth less than money today due to its potential earning capacity (interest), the present value of a future income stream must be less than the sum of the nominal payments. The total undiscounted income is $50,000/year * 10 years = $500,000. Any calculated present value greater than this amount is incorrect. The accountant's answer of $515,640 is therefore unreasonable.

Question 10

A company's profit from selling xx units of a product is given by P(x)P(x). A calculus student correctly calculates that the marginal profit at a production level of 500 units is $P'(500) = -$2.50. How should the company's management interpret this result?

  1. The total profit from selling 500 units is negative, resulting in a loss of $2.50.
  2. The average profit per unit for the first 500 units sold is -$2.50.
  3. Producing and selling the 501st unit will likely decrease the company's total profit by approximately $2.50. (correct answer)
  4. The selling price of the product should be increased by $2.50 to make the production of the next unit profitable.
Explanation: Marginal profit, P(x)P'(x), represents the approximate change in total profit from selling one additional unit. A negative value, $P'(500) = -$2.50, means that producing and selling the 501st unit is expected to decrease the total profit by about $2.50.

Question 11

The rate at which a company's revenue is growing is modeled by R(t)=1.2e0.04tR'(t) = 1.2e^{0.04t} million dollars per year, where tt is the number of years from the start of 2020. A student calculates 24R(t)dt2.59\int_{2}^{4} R'(t) dt \approx 2.59. What is the correct business interpretation of this value?

  1. The company's revenue at the start of 2024 was $2.59 million.
  2. The total accumulated revenue increased by approximately $2.59 million between the start of 2022 and the start of 2024. (correct answer)
  3. The company's revenue was growing at a rate of $2.59 million per year at the start of 2024.
  4. The average rate of revenue growth between the start of 2022 and 2024 was $2.59 million per year.
Explanation: The definite integral of a rate of change function, R(t)R'(t), over an interval [a,b][a, b] gives the total net change in the original function, R(t)R(t), from t=at=a to t=bt=b. Here, the integral from t=2t=2 (start of 2022) to t=4t=4 (start of 2024) represents the total increase in revenue over that two-year period.

Question 12

A student is calculating consumer surplus for a product. The demand curve is p=D(q)=150q2p = D(q) = 150 - q^2. After finding the equilibrium price pE=110p_E = 110, the student sets up the integral 040(110(150q2))dq\int_{0}^{\sqrt{40}} (110 - (150 - q^2)) dq. This calculation results in a negative value. Why is this result nonsensical and what is the likely error?

  1. The result is nonsensical because the limits of integration are incorrect; they should be from 0 to the price pE=110p_E = 110.
  2. The result is plausible; it represents a market where consumers pay more than their maximum willingness to pay.
  3. The result is nonsensical because consumer surplus cannot be negative. The integrand should be D(q)pED(q) - p_E. (correct answer)
  4. The result is nonsensical because the supply function was not used. The correct integrand is D(q)S(q)D(q) - S(q).
Explanation: Consumer surplus represents the total benefit to consumers and is calculated as the area between the demand curve and the equilibrium price line. This area cannot be negative. The correct formula for consumer surplus is 0qE(D(q)pE)dq\int_{0}^{q_E} (D(q) - p_E) dq. The student has reversed the terms in the integrand to (pED(q))(p_E - D(q)), which calculates the negative of the consumer surplus.

Question 13

The total number of users for a new mobile app is modeled by the logistic function N(t)=5000001+499e0.8tN(t) = \frac{500000}{1 + 499e^{-0.8t}}, where tt is the number of months since launch. An analyst, using a different short-term linear trend model, predicts that the number of users will reach 600,000 in 24 months. Based on the logistic model provided, how should this prediction be evaluated?

  1. The prediction is unreasonable, as the logistic model shows the number of users approaches a maximum carrying capacity of 500,000. (correct answer)
  2. The prediction is reasonable, as the linear model is likely more accurate for short-term forecasts than the logistic model.
  3. The prediction is reasonable if the company launches a major marketing campaign, which would alter the parameters of the logistic model.
  4. The prediction is unreasonable because the rate of growth N(t)N'(t) must be negative by t=24t=24, making 600,000 impossible.
Explanation: A logistic function of the form N(t)=L1+AektN(t) = \frac{L}{1 + Ae^{-kt}} has a horizontal asymptote at y=Ly=L, which is the carrying capacity or limiting value. In this model, L=500,000L=500,000. Therefore, according to this model, the number of users can approach but never exceed 500,000. A prediction of 600,000 users is inconsistent with this model and thus unreasonable.

Question 14

After solving an optimization problem, a student finds that a rectangular garden with fixed perimeter 100 feet should have dimensions 25 ft × 25 ft to maximize area, giving a maximum area of 625 square feet. A classmate argues this can't be right because "rectangles should be longer than they are wide." How should the student respond to check their answer's reasonableness?

  1. Recalculate using A=x(50x)A = x(50-x) where xx is width, find A(x)=0A'(x) = 0 gives x=25x = 25, and verify that A(24)=624<625>624=A(26)A(24) = 624 < 625 > 624 = A(26)
  2. Explain that the constraint 2x+2y=1002x + 2y = 100 allows squares since x=yx = y is permitted, then test nearby rectangles like 24×26 to confirm area 624 < 625
  3. Point out that among all rectangles with fixed perimeter, the square maximizes area, then verify by testing several rectangles: 20×30 gives 600, 15×35 gives 525, both less than 625 (correct answer)
  4. Show that the optimization correctly used A=x(50x)A = x(50-x), found the critical point at x=25x = 25, and confirmed it's a maximum using the second derivative test
Explanation: The best response addresses the classmate's misconception while providing concrete verification. The student should explain that squares ARE rectangles and that the square maximizes area among all rectangles with fixed perimeter, then demonstrate with examples (20×30→600, 15×35→525, 10×40→400) that non-square rectangles indeed give smaller areas. Choice A is purely computational. Choice B explains why squares are allowed but doesn't strongly demonstrate optimality. Choice D focuses on method verification rather than addressing the conceptual objection.

Question 15

After finding that a company's cost function C(x)=0.02x33x2+150x+5000C(x) = 0.02x^3 - 3x^2 + 150x + 5000 has a critical point at x=50x = 50, a student calculates the marginal cost C(50)=0C'(50) = 0 and average cost AC(50)=C(50)50=158AC(50) = \frac{C(50)}{50} = 158. They conclude that producing 50 units minimizes average cost. What should they verify to check this conclusion?

  1. Confirm that C(50)=0C'(50) = 0 by calculating C(x)=0.06x26x+150C'(x) = 0.06x^2 - 6x + 150 and substituting x=50x = 50 to get 150300+150=0150 - 300 + 150 = 0
  2. Verify that average cost is minimized when AC(x)=0AC'(x) = 0, which occurs when C(x)=AC(x)C'(x) = AC(x), then check if C(50)=0C'(50) = 0 equals AC(50)=158AC(50) = 158 (correct answer)
  3. Check the second derivative C(50)=0.12(50)6=0C''(50) = 0.12(50) - 6 = 0 to confirm this is an inflection point of the cost function, not a minimum
  4. Calculate AC(x)=xC(x)C(x)x2AC'(x) = \frac{xC'(x) - C(x)}{x^2} and verify that AC(50)=0AC'(50) = 0, then use the second derivative test on AC(x)AC(x) to confirm a minimum
Explanation: The student made an error in reasoning. Average cost is minimized when AC'(x) = 0, which occurs when marginal cost equals average cost (C'(x) = AC(x)). Since C'(50) = 0 but AC(50) = 158, these are not equal, so x = 50 does not minimize average cost. The condition C'(50) = 0 means marginal cost is minimized at x = 50, not average cost. Choice A only verifies the calculation. Choice C correctly identifies this as an inflection point but doesn't address the average cost claim. Choice D describes the correct method but is more complex than needed for this check.

Question 16

A student models weekly sales S(t)=500+200sin(πt26)S(t) = 500 + 200\sin(\frac{\pi t}{26}) where tt is weeks since January 1st. They conclude that sales peak at 700 units in week 13 and hit a minimum of 300 units in week 39. What is the most important reasonableness check for this seasonal model?

  1. Verify that the amplitude of 200 units represents a realistic fluctuation compared to the baseline of 500 units for typical seasonal variation
  2. Confirm that the period of 52 weeks matches an annual cycle and that peak summer sales (week 13) and minimum fall sales (week 39) align with business expectations
  3. Check that the sine function oscillates between -1 and 1, ensuring the sales range from 300 to 700 units is mathematically correct
  4. Validate that week 13 corresponds to late March and week 39 to late September, then assess if these seasonal peaks match the business context (correct answer)
Explanation: The most critical check is whether the timing makes business sense. Week 13 is late March and week 39 is late September. The student should verify if peak sales in March and minimum sales in September align with their business type (e.g., this might work for garden supplies but not swimwear). Choice A checks mathematical reasonableness but ignores timing. Choice B incorrectly states the period and timing. Choice C only verifies the mathematical range without considering business context.

Question 17

A student uses integration to find the total profit over 6 months from profit rate P(t)=1000e0.05tP'(t) = 1000e^{0.05t} dollars per month, where tt is months since January. They calculate 061000e0.05tdt=20000(e0.31)$6,997\int_0^6 1000e^{0.05t} dt = 20000(e^{0.3} - 1) \approx \$6,997. Their study partner argues this is too low since the profit rate starts at $1000/month. How should they resolve this disagreement?

  1. Check that the antiderivative 1000e0.05t0.05=20000e0.05t\frac{1000e^{0.05t}}{0.05} = 20000e^{0.05t} is correct, then verify the definite integral calculation gives the total accumulated profit
  2. Compare the result to simple estimates: if profit rate were constant at $1000/month, total would be $6000; since the rate grows exponentially, $6997 is reasonably close but higher (correct answer)
  3. Recognize that $6997 represents total accumulated profit while the partner may be thinking of final profit rate $P'(6) = 1000e^{0.3} \approx \1350 per month
  4. Verify that e0.31.3499e^{0.3} \approx 1.3499, so 20000(1.34991)=20000(0.3499)$699820000(1.3499 - 1) = 20000(0.3499) \approx \$6998, confirming the integration arithmetic is accurate
Explanation: The best reasonableness check uses estimation to validate the order of magnitude. If the profit rate were constant at the initial $1000/month, total profit would be $6000. Since the rate grows exponentially from $1000 to about $1350, the actual total of $6997 should be higher than $6000 but not dramatically so, which it is. This resolves the disagreement by showing the answer is reasonable. Choice A only verifies technique. Choice C identifies a possible confusion but doesn't check reasonableness. Choice D only confirms arithmetic.

Question 18

A company's profit function is P(x)=2x2+120x1000P(x) = -2x^2 + 120x - 1000 where xx is the number of units produced (in hundreds). After finding that maximum profit occurs at x=30x = 30, a student calculates the maximum profit as P(30)=800P(30) = 800. Which statement best describes how to check if this answer is reasonable?

  1. Verify that P(30)=0P'(30) = 0 and confirm the profit value by substitution, then check that nearby values like P(29)P(29) and P(31)P(31) are smaller than 800 (correct answer)
  2. Check that the vertex formula x=b2ax = -\frac{b}{2a} gives x=30x = 30, then verify the calculation P(30)=800P(30) = 800 is arithmetically correct
  3. Confirm that x=30x = 30 represents 3000 units and that a profit of $800 per unit seems reasonable for typical manufacturing
  4. Verify that the parabola opens downward since a=2<0a = -2 < 0, ensuring a maximum exists, then check that P(30)>0P(30) > 0 indicates profitability
Explanation: To thoroughly check reasonableness, we need multiple verification steps: confirm the critical point condition P'(30) = 0, verify the arithmetic in P(30) = -2(900) + 120(30) - 1000 = 800, and test that nearby values are indeed smaller (P(29) = 798, P(31) = 798), confirming it's truly a maximum. Choice B only checks the calculation but not whether it's actually a maximum. Choice C misinterprets the profit as per-unit rather than total. Choice D confirms a maximum exists but doesn't verify the specific value or location.

Question 19

A student models the rate of change of inventory I(t)=5010tI'(t) = 50 - 10t where tt is time in weeks. Starting with I(0)=200I(0) = 200 units, they find I(t)=50t5t2+200I(t) = 50t - 5t^2 + 200 and conclude that inventory becomes zero when t=10t = 10 weeks. Which check would best validate this timeline?

  1. Verify that I(10)=5010(10)=50I'(10) = 50 - 10(10) = -50, confirming that inventory is decreasing at 50 units per week when it reaches zero
  2. Substitute into the quadratic formula: 50t5t2+200=050t - 5t^2 + 200 = 0 gives t=50±2500+400010=10t = \frac{-50 \pm \sqrt{2500 + 4000}}{-10} = 10 or t=4t = -4, taking the positive solution
  3. Check that I(5)=50(5)5(25)+200=325I(5) = 50(5) - 5(25) + 200 = 325, verifying inventory increases initially, then confirm I(5)=0I'(5) = 0 indicates maximum inventory at the halfway point (correct answer)
  4. Confirm that the antiderivative I(t)=50t5t2+200I(t) = 50t - 5t^2 + 200 satisfies I(t)=5010tI'(t) = 50 - 10t and I(0)=200I(0) = 200, then verify I(10)=0I(10) = 0 arithmetically
Explanation: The best reasonableness check examines the inventory behavior over time. Since I'(t) = 50 - 10t starts positive and becomes negative, inventory should first increase to a maximum when I'(5) = 0, then decrease. Checking I(5) = 325 confirms this pattern makes sense - inventory grows from 200 to 325 over 5 weeks, then depletes to 0 over the next 5 weeks. Choice A only checks the final rate. Choice B verifies algebra but not behavior. Choice D confirms mathematical correctness but not practical reasonableness.