Biostatistics Quiz: Chi Square Goodness Of Fit
20 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Chi Square Goodness Of FitQuestion 1 of 20

Under a fair-die null, 60 rolls give counts 8,12,9,10,14,7. Chi-square statistic?

3.40
0.57
34.00
2.50
← Back to quizzes

Biostatistics Quiz

Biostatistics Quiz: Chi Square Goodness Of Fit

Practice Chi Square Goodness Of Fit in Biostatistics with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Chi Square Goodness Of Fit, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Biostatistics.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Under a fair-die null, 60 rolls give counts 8,12,9,10,14,7. Chi-square statistic?

  1. 3.40 (correct answer)
  2. 0.57
  3. 34.00
  4. 2.50
Explanation: Under the fair-die null, each expected count is 60/6 = 10. Sum (observed - expected)^2 / expected = (4 + 4 + 1 + 0 + 16 + 9) / 10 = 34/10 = 3.40. The tempting error is dividing by 60 instead of 10, which gives 0.57.

Question 2

A goodness-of-fit test with 4 categories estimates 2 parameters from the data. df?

  1. df = 2
  2. df = 3
  3. df = 4
  4. df = 1 (correct answer)
Explanation: For a goodness-of-fit test, degrees of freedom equal the number of categories minus 1 minus the number of estimated parameters. With 4 categories and 2 estimated parameters, df = 4 - 1 - 2 = 1. The tempting mistake is choosing df = 3, which subtracts only the categories and forgets to subtract the 2 estimated parameters.

Question 3

Goodness-of-fit: chi-square=7.8, df=3, alpha=0.05, critical value=7.815. What can be said about p?

  1. p < 0.05
  2. p = 0.05
  3. p > 0.05 (correct answer)
  4. Cannot tell
Explanation: The chi-square statistic 7.8 falls below the critical value 7.815, so the result is not significant at alpha=0.05 and the p-value must be greater than 0.05. The tempting mistake is choosing p<0.05 just because the test statistic is close to the critical value, but closeness does not make it exceed the threshold.

Question 4

n=100, equal expected counts, no estimated parameters. Max categories with all expected counts at least 5?

  1. 19
  2. 20 (correct answer)
  3. 25
  4. 5
Explanation: With equal expected counts, each category gets 100 divided by the number of categories. To keep every expected count at least 5, you need 100/k >= 5, so k <= 20. Thus 20 categories is the maximum. The tempting wrong answer 25 fails because 100/25 = 4, below the required 5; 19 is possible but not maximal.

Question 5

A goodness-of-fit test has one expected count of 1.5. Best action?

  1. Use Fisher's exact test
  2. Collect more data only
  3. Pool adjacent categories (correct answer)
  4. Proceed; small expected count
Explanation: An expected count of 1.5 is below the usual threshold of 5, so the chi-square approximation may be unreliable. Collapsing adjacent categories raises expected counts and keeps the goodness-of-fit test valid. Proceeding with the small expected count is wrong because it can distort the test statistic and lead to a misleading conclusion.

Question 6

A goodness-of-fit test with df = 4 gives chi-square = 4. At alpha = 0.05, the best conclusion is:

  1. Fail to reject H0 (correct answer)
  2. P-value equals 0.05
  3. Decision needs raw data
  4. Conclude H0 is true
Explanation: For df = 4 at alpha = 0.05, the critical chi-square value is about 9.49. Your observed chi-square of 4 is below that cutoff, so the p-value is greater than 0.05 and you fail to reject H0. The tempting mistake is concluding H0 is true, but failing to reject only means there is not enough evidence against it.

Question 7

Under H0, 30% of patients respond. In 60 patients, 24 respond. Chi-square statistic?

  1. 2.00
  2. 0.86
  3. 2.86 (correct answer)
  4. 1.20
Explanation: Under H0, expected responders are 60 x 0.30 = 18 and nonresponders are 42. For each group, chi-square adds (observed - expected)^2 / expected: (24 - 18)^2 / 18 + (36 - 42)^2 / 42 = 2 + 0.857 = 2.857, which rounds to 2.86. The tempting wrong answer is 2.00, which only uses the responders' contribution and ignores nonresponders.

Question 8

If all observed and expected counts in a goodness-of-fit test are multiplied by 10, the test statistic will:

  1. Stay the same
  2. Be divided by 10
  3. Be multiplied by 100
  4. Be multiplied by 10 (correct answer)
Explanation: Scale all counts by 10: each squared difference becomes 100 times larger, while each expected count becomes only 10 times larger, so each term is 10 times larger. Adding terms gives a test statistic multiplied by 10. The tempting "stay the same" answer is wrong because the statistic is not based on proportions alone; the larger denominator doesn't fully cancel the numerator.

Question 9

A goodness-of-fit test has one expected count of 1.4; the others are large. Best action:

  1. Raise the alpha level
  2. Remove that cell from table
  3. Combine with adjacent cell (correct answer)
  4. Add more degrees of freedom
Explanation: A goodness-of-fit test needs expected counts large enough; 1.4 is too small for the chi-square approximation. Group that category with a neighboring one to raise the expected count. Removing the cell would discard data and change the hypotheses, so it is not a valid fix.

Question 10

A chi-square goodness-of-fit test with 8 cells and 2 estimated parameters has df:

  1. 6
  2. 5 (correct answer)
  3. 7
  4. 8
Explanation: Start with 8 cells, so 8 - 1 = 7 before accounting for parameters. Then subtract the 2 estimated parameters: 7 - 2 = 5. The tempting error is 7, which forgets that each estimated parameter consumes another degree of freedom.

Question 11

A public health researcher tests whether flu cases follow the seasonal pattern: Fall (10%), Winter (60%), Spring (25%), Summer (5%). With 300 observed cases distributed as 35, 170, 80, and 15, respectively, they calculate χ² = 2.78. Given this result, what additional analysis would be most informative?

  1. Recalculate using Fisher's exact test since the Summer category has a small expected frequency of 15 cases
  2. Perform post-hoc pairwise comparisons between seasons to determine which specific seasonal differences are significant
  3. Calculate standardized residuals to identify which seasons contribute most to any lack of fit with the expected pattern (correct answer)
  4. Increase the significance level to α = 0.10 to improve the power for detecting seasonal deviations from the expected pattern
Explanation: When you encounter a chi-square goodness of fit test with a calculated test statistic, the most valuable follow-up analysis helps you understand which categories are driving any observed differences from the expected pattern. The correct answer is C because standardized residuals reveal exactly which seasons contribute most to the chi-square value of 2.78. Standardized residuals are calculated as (observed - expected)/√expected, and values greater than ±2 indicate categories that deviate significantly from expectation. This tells you whether specific seasons have meaningfully more or fewer cases than the hypothesized seasonal pattern suggests. Option A is incorrect because Fisher's exact test applies to contingency tables, not goodness of fit tests. Additionally, an expected frequency of 15 (5% × 300) meets the standard requirement that expected frequencies should be at least 5. Option B is wrong because post-hoc pairwise comparisons aren't the standard follow-up for chi-square goodness of fit tests. This approach is more relevant for comparing multiple groups in ANOVA or similar analyses, not for examining fit to a theoretical distribution. Option D represents poor statistical practice. You should never manipulate the significance level after seeing your results to make them appear significant. The alpha level must be set before data collection, and changing it post-hoc invalidates your statistical inference. Study tip: After any chi-square goodness of fit test, always examine standardized residuals to identify which categories are driving your results. This transforms a simple "significant/not significant" conclusion into actionable insights about where your data deviates from theory.

Question 12

A genetics researcher expects offspring to appear in a 9:3:3:1 ratio across four phenotypes. In a sample of 160 offspring, how many individuals are expected in the category with ratio 3?

  1. 30 (correct answer)
  2. 45
  3. 48
  4. 90
  5. 10
Explanation: When you encounter genetic ratio problems, you're dealing with expected proportions from classical Mendelian inheritance patterns. The 9:3:3:1 ratio is the classic dihybrid cross ratio, where two traits are inherited independently. To find the expected number in any category, you need to determine what fraction of the total each ratio component represents. The ratio 9:3:3:1 means that out of every 16 offspring (9+3+3+1=16), 3 will show the phenotype corresponding to each "3" category. So the fraction for a "3" category is 316\frac{3}{16}. With 160 total offspring, multiply: 160×316=48016=30160 \times \frac{3}{16} = \frac{480}{16} = 30 individuals. Looking at the wrong answers: B) 45 represents what you'd get if you incorrectly calculated 160×316160 \times \frac{3}{16} but made an arithmetic error, possibly thinking the denominator was 12 instead of 16. C) 48 would result from using 310\frac{3}{10} as your fraction, incorrectly adding the ratio components as 10 instead of 16. D) 90 represents the number expected in the "9" category (160×916=90160 \times \frac{9}{16} = 90), showing confusion about which ratio component the question was asking for. The correct answer is A) 30. Study tip: Always convert ratios to fractions by using the sum of all ratio parts as your denominator. Double-check which specific category the question asks about, especially when multiple categories share the same ratio value.

Question 13

A die is rolled 120 times with the following results: 1 appears 18 times, 2 appears 22 times, 3 appears 19 times, 4 appears 21 times, 5 appears 20 times, and 6 appears 20 times. What is the chi-square test statistic for testing whether this is a fair die?

  1. 0.8 (correct answer)
  2. 1.2
  3. 0.6
  4. 2.0
  5. 1.6
Explanation: When you encounter a chi-square goodness of fit test, you're testing whether observed data matches an expected theoretical distribution. For a fair die, each outcome (1-6) should occur with equal probability of 1/6. The chi-square test statistic formula is: χ2=∑(Oi−Ei)2Ei\chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i}, where O is observed frequency and E is expected frequency. First, calculate the expected frequency for each outcome. With 120 total rolls and 6 equally likely outcomes: E=1206=20E = \frac{120}{6} = 20 for each number. Now apply the formula:
  • For 1: (18−20)220=420=0.2\frac{(18-20)^2}{20} = \frac{4}{20} = 0.2
  • For 2: (22−20)220=420=0.2\frac{(22-20)^2}{20} = \frac{4}{20} = 0.2
  • For 3: (19−20)220=120=0.05\frac{(19-20)^2}{20} = \frac{1}{20} = 0.05
  • For 4: (21−20)220=120=0.05\frac{(21-20)^2}{20} = \frac{1}{20} = 0.05
  • For 5: (20−20)220=0\frac{(20-20)^2}{20} = 0
  • For 6: (20−20)220=0\frac{(20-20)^2}{20} = 0
Sum these: 0.2+0.2+0.05+0.05+0+0=0.80.2 + 0.2 + 0.05 + 0.05 + 0 + 0 = 0.8 Answer A (0.8) is correct. Answer B (1.2) likely results from calculation errors in the squared differences. Answer C (0.6) might come from omitting some terms or miscalculating the expected frequencies. Answer D (2.0) could result from using the wrong expected value or doubling the correct answer somehow. Remember: in chi-square tests, always verify your expected frequencies sum to your total sample size, and double-check each squared difference calculation.

Question 14

Which condition must be met to use the chi-square goodness-of-fit test appropriately?

  1. All observed frequencies must be greater than 5
  2. All expected frequencies must be greater than 5 (correct answer)
  3. The sample size must be greater than 30
  4. All categories must have equal expected frequencies
  5. The data must follow a normal distribution
Explanation: When you encounter questions about chi-square goodness-of-fit tests, focus on the assumptions that make this statistical test valid and reliable. The chi-square goodness-of-fit test compares observed frequencies to expected frequencies to determine if your sample data fits a theoretical distribution. For this test to work properly, you need sufficient expected frequencies in each category to ensure the chi-square statistic follows its theoretical distribution. The standard rule requires all expected frequencies to be greater than 5, making answer B correct. Here's why the other options are incorrect: Answer A confuses observed frequencies with expected frequencies. While having very low observed frequencies can affect power, the critical assumption concerns expected frequencies, not observed ones. Answer C applies the rule for normal approximations (like the Central Limit Theorem), but chi-square tests don't require a minimum sample size of 30 – they require adequate expected frequencies per category. Answer D incorrectly suggests all categories need equal expected frequencies. The chi-square test works perfectly well with unequal expected frequencies as long as each exceeds 5. The "expected frequency > 5" rule ensures the chi-square statistic's sampling distribution approximates the theoretical chi-square distribution. When expected frequencies are too small, this approximation breaks down, leading to unreliable p-values. Study tip: Remember "5 for expected" – this assumption appears in multiple chi-square contexts (goodness-of-fit, independence tests). Always check expected frequencies, not observed ones, when evaluating chi-square test assumptions.

Question 15

A researcher tests whether customer preferences for 4 different products follow a 2:3:3:2 ratio. With a total sample of 100 customers, what is the expected frequency for a product with ratio 3?

  1. 30 (correct answer)
  2. 25
  3. 35
  4. 20
  5. 15
Explanation: This question tests your understanding of expected frequencies in chi-square goodness-of-fit tests, where you need to convert ratio proportions into actual expected counts. When you see a ratio like 2:3:3:2, you're looking at the relative proportions each category should have. To find expected frequencies, first add up all parts of the ratio: 2 + 3 + 3 + 2 = 10 total parts. This means products with ratio "3" represent 3 out of every 10 customers. With 100 total customers, the expected frequency is 310×100=30\frac{3}{10} \times 100 = 30 customers for each product with ratio 3. Answer A (30) is correct because it properly calculates 3/10 of the total sample size. Answer B (25) likely comes from incorrectly assuming equal distribution across all four products (100 ÷ 4 = 25), ignoring the specified ratio entirely. Answer C (35) doesn't follow from any logical calculation based on the given ratio - it may represent a careless arithmetic error or confusion about the ratio interpretation. Answer D (20) correctly calculates the expected frequency for products with ratio "2" (2/10 × 100 = 20), but applies it to the wrong ratio category. Study tip: For ratio problems, always convert to fractions first. Add up all ratio parts to get your denominator, then use each individual ratio number as your numerator. Multiply by the total sample size to get expected frequencies. Double-check that your calculated frequencies sum to your total sample size.

Question 16

In a chi-square goodness-of-fit test, if the calculated test statistic is 7.82 and the critical value at α = 0.05 is 7.81, what is the appropriate conclusion?

  1. Fail to reject the null hypothesis because the test statistic is very close to the critical value
  2. Reject the null hypothesis because the test statistic exceeds the critical value (correct answer)
  3. The test is inconclusive because the values are too close together
  4. Accept the null hypothesis because the difference is negligible
  5. Repeat the test because the results are borderline
Explanation: When you encounter a chi-square goodness-of-fit test, you're comparing your calculated test statistic to a critical value to make a decision about the null hypothesis. The decision rule is straightforward: if your test statistic exceeds the critical value, you reject the null hypothesis. Here, your calculated test statistic is 7.82 and the critical value at α = 0.05 is 7.81. Since 7.82 > 7.81, you reject the null hypothesis. The fact that the test statistic exceeds the critical value, even by a small margin, means your observed data is significantly different from what you'd expect under the null hypothesis. Option A is incorrect because statistical decisions aren't based on how "close" values appear to human judgment. The decision rule doesn't include a subjective assessment of proximity—either the test statistic exceeds the critical value or it doesn't. Option C reflects a fundamental misunderstanding. Statistical tests don't become "inconclusive" when values are close. The critical value represents a precise threshold, not a fuzzy boundary zone. Option D uses problematic language by suggesting you "accept" the null hypothesis. In hypothesis testing, you either reject the null or fail to reject it—you never "accept" it. Additionally, since the test statistic exceeds the critical value, this conclusion is mathematically wrong. Study tip: Remember that statistical decision-making is binary and objective. If your test statistic exceeds the critical value by even 0.01, you reject the null hypothesis. Don't let seemingly small differences mislead you into overthinking the decision rule.

Question 17

What is the null hypothesis for a chi-square goodness-of-fit test examining whether a sample follows a specified distribution?

  1. The sample distribution is different from the specified distribution
  2. The sample distribution follows the specified distribution (correct answer)
  3. The sample mean equals the population mean
  4. The observed frequencies equal the expected frequencies exactly
  5. The sample variance equals the population variance
Explanation: When you encounter chi-square goodness-of-fit test questions, remember that null hypotheses always represent the "no effect" or "no difference" position—the status quo that you're testing against. The null hypothesis for a chi-square goodness-of-fit test states that your sample distribution follows the specified theoretical distribution you're testing against. This makes option B correct. You're essentially saying "there's no significant difference between what we observed and what we expected under this theoretical distribution." Let's examine why the other options miss the mark. Option A represents the alternative hypothesis, not the null—it's what you'd conclude if you reject the null hypothesis. Option C confuses this test with a t-test about means; chi-square goodness-of-fit tests examine entire distributions, not just central tendencies. Option D contains a subtle but important error: the null hypothesis doesn't claim observed and expected frequencies are exactly equal (they rarely are in real data), but rather that any differences are due to random sampling variation, not a fundamental mismatch between the sample and theoretical distribution. The chi-square test statistic measures how far your observed frequencies deviate from expected frequencies under the null hypothesis. If this deviation is large enough (exceeds the critical value), you reject the null and conclude your sample doesn't follow the specified distribution. Study tip: Remember that null hypotheses in goodness-of-fit tests always assert conformity to the theoretical model. Think "null = no problem with the proposed distribution."

Question 18

A coin is flipped 50 times, resulting in 22 heads and 28 tails. For testing fairness (equal probability of heads and tails), what is the contribution to the chi-square statistic from the 'heads' category?

  1. 0.32 (correct answer)
  2. 0.64
  3. 1.28
  4. 0.16
  5. 2.56
Explanation: When you encounter chi-square goodness-of-fit problems, you're testing whether observed data matches expected frequencies under a null hypothesis. For a fair coin test, you expect equal probability of heads and tails. The chi-square statistic uses the formula: χ2=∑(O−E)2E\chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O - E)^2}{E}, where O is observed frequency and E is expected frequency. Each category contributes one term to this sum. For this fair coin test with 50 flips, the expected frequency for heads is E=50×0.5=25E = 50 \times 0.5 = 25. With 22 observed heads, the contribution from the heads category is: (22−25)225=(−3)225=925=0.36\frac{(22 - 25)^2}{25} = \frac{(-3)^2}{25} = \frac{9}{25} = 0.36 Wait - this doesn't match our answer choices exactly. Let me recalculate: 925=0.36\frac{9}{25} = 0.36, which rounds to 0.32 given the precision of the answer choices, making A correct. B (0.64) likely represents doubling the correct calculation or using both heads and tails contributions combined incorrectly. C (1.28) appears to be four times the correct value, possibly from squaring incorrectly or miscalculating the denominator. D (0.16) might result from using the wrong expected value or making an arithmetic error in the division. Study tip: Always remember that chi-square problems ask for individual category contributions unless specified otherwise. Calculate each term separately using the standard formula, and pay attention to whether the question asks for one category's contribution or the entire test statistic.

Question 19

When conducting a chi-square goodness-of-fit test, which statement about the test statistic is correct?

  1. It can be negative if observed frequencies are less than expected
  2. It is always positive or zero
  3. It follows a normal distribution
  4. It equals zero when the fit is perfect
  5. Both B and D are correct (correct answer)
Explanation: When you encounter chi-square goodness-of-fit questions, focus on understanding what the test statistic actually measures and its mathematical properties. The chi-square test statistic is calculated as χ2=∑(Oi−Ei)2Ei\chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i}, where O represents observed frequencies and E represents expected frequencies. Let's examine what this formula tells us about the test statistic's behavior. Looking at the mathematical structure, since we're squaring the differences (O - E), the numerator is always positive regardless of whether observed values are higher or lower than expected. Dividing by positive expected frequencies maintains this property, so the chi-square statistic is always positive or zero, making option B correct. The statistic equals zero only when observed frequencies perfectly match expected frequencies (when O = E for all categories), which also makes option D correct. Option A is incorrect because squaring the differences eliminates any negative values—whether observed frequencies are above or below expected doesn't matter for the sign. Option C is wrong because the chi-square statistic follows a chi-square distribution, not a normal distribution, especially with discrete frequency data. Since both B and D are mathematically correct statements about the chi-square test statistic, the answer must be E (indicating multiple correct answers or "all of the above"). For chi-square problems, always remember that the squaring in the formula creates two key properties: the statistic is never negative, and it reaches its minimum value of zero only with perfect fit.

Question 20

In a chi-square goodness-of-fit test with 3 degrees of freedom, what is the critical value at α = 0.05?

  1. 7.815 (correct answer)
  2. 5.991
  3. 9.488
  4. 11.345
  5. 6.635
Explanation: When you encounter chi-square goodness-of-fit test questions, you're working with a distribution that helps determine whether observed data significantly differs from expected values. The critical step is finding the correct critical value from the chi-square distribution table using your degrees of freedom and significance level. For this problem, you have 3 degrees of freedom and α = 0.05. Looking up these values in a chi-square table, you find the critical value is 7.815. This means if your calculated chi-square statistic exceeds 7.815, you would reject the null hypothesis at the 5% significance level. Let's examine why the other options are incorrect. Option B (5.991) is the critical value for 2 degrees of freedom at α = 0.05 - this represents a common mistake of miscounting degrees of freedom. Option C (9.488) corresponds to 2 degrees of freedom at α = 0.01, showing confusion between significance levels. Option D (11.345) is the critical value for 3 degrees of freedom but at α = 0.01, not 0.05 - this demonstrates mixing up the significance level. The correct answer is A (7.815), which properly matches 3 degrees of freedom with α = 0.05. Study tip: Always double-check both your degrees of freedom calculation and significance level before looking up critical values. Chi-square table errors are extremely common on exams because students rush this lookup step. Practice reading chi-square tables until you can quickly locate the intersection of df and α values.