AP Statistics Quiz: Estimating Probabilities Using Simulation
20 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Estimating Probabilities Using SimulationQuestion 1 of 20

A school counselor wants to estimate the probability that, in a randomly selected group of 5 students from a large school, at least 2 have birthdays in the same month. To simulate, the counselor uses a random number generator that produces integers 1–12 (each equally likely) to represent birth months, generates 5 numbers for one trial, records whether at least one month appears at least twice, and repeats this process 1000 trials. The simulation produced 327 successes. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

The probability is exactly 0.3270.327 because 327 out of 1000 trials were successes.
About 32.7%32.7\% of groups of 5 students from this school are expected to have at least 2 birthdays in the same month.
In the next 1000 trials, there will be exactly 327 successes.
Because the random numbers 1–12 were used, the result only applies to months with 12 days.
The simulation shows that 327 students at the school have birthdays in the same month.
← Back to quizzes

AP Statistics Quiz

AP Statistics Quiz: Estimating Probabilities Using Simulation

Practice Estimating Probabilities Using Simulation in AP Statistics with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Estimating Probabilities Using Simulation, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for AP Statistics.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A school counselor wants to estimate the probability that, in a randomly selected group of 5 students from a large school, at least 2 have birthdays in the same month. To simulate, the counselor uses a random number generator that produces integers 1–12 (each equally likely) to represent birth months, generates 5 numbers for one trial, records whether at least one month appears at least twice, and repeats this process 1000 trials. The simulation produced 327 successes. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The probability is exactly 0.3270.327 because 327 out of 1000 trials were successes.
  2. About 32.7%32.7\% of groups of 5 students from this school are expected to have at least 2 birthdays in the same month. (correct answer)
  3. In the next 1000 trials, there will be exactly 327 successes.
  4. Because the random numbers 1–12 were used, the result only applies to months with 12 days.
  5. The simulation shows that 327 students at the school have birthdays in the same month.

Explanation: This question assesses the AP Statistics skill of estimating probabilities using simulation, where random number generation mimics birth months to approximate the likelihood of shared birthdays in a group. The simulation repeated 1000 trials, each consisting of generating five random numbers from 1 to 12 and checking for at least two matches, resulting in 327 successes, which provides an estimate rather than an exact value. A common distractor is choice A, which incorrectly claims the probability is exactly 0.327, ignoring that simulations yield approximations that improve with more trials but are not precise. In a mini-lesson on simulation, remember that it models real-world randomness by assuming a probability model (here, equal likelihood of months) and using repeated trials to estimate outcomes, such as the proportion of successes. This approach is useful when theoretical calculations are complex, like in the birthday problem. The correct interpretation is B, as it properly states the estimate in terms of expected proportion without claiming exactness.

Question 2

A basketball player makes a free throw with probability 0.720.72. A coach simulates a 10-shot practice by generating a random integer 1–100 for each shot and counting a make when the number is 1–72. One trial is 10 simulated shots; the coach repeats 500 trials to estimate the probability the player makes at least 8 of 10. The simulation shows 141 trials with at least 8 makes. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The probability the player makes at least 8 of 10 is exactly 141/500141/500.
  2. The player will make at least 8 of 10 in exactly 141 of the next 500 real practices.
  3. The estimated probability the player makes at least 8 of 10 is about 141/500141/500, assuming each shot is independent with make probability 0.720.72. (correct answer)
  4. Because 10 random numbers were generated per trial, the probability of at least 8 makes must be 10×0.7210 \times 0.72.
  5. The simulation proves the player's true make probability is 0.720.72.

Explanation: In AP Statistics, estimating probabilities using simulation involves modeling events like free throws with random numbers to approximate success rates over multiple trials. Here, the coach ran 500 trials, each with 10 simulated shots where numbers 1-72 represent makes, yielding 141 trials with at least 8 makes, which estimates the probability under the assumption of independence and a 0.72 make rate. Choice A is a distractor because it treats the simulation result as the exact probability, but simulations only provide estimates that can vary. A mini-lesson on simulation: it uses random processes to replicate scenarios, repeating trials to compute proportions that approximate true probabilities, especially for binomial outcomes like this. This method assumes the underlying model is correct and helps visualize rare events. The correct choice is C, as it accurately describes the estimate with the given assumptions.

Question 3

A quality-control engineer estimates the probability that a sample of 4 light bulbs contains at least one defective bulb when the long-run defect rate is 0.100.10. To simulate, she uses a random digit 0–9 for each bulb, counts a bulb defective if the digit is 0, records whether at least one defect occurred in the sample of 4, and repeats 800 trials. She observes 276 trials with at least one defective bulb. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The simulation shows that exactly 10%10\% of bulbs are defective.
  2. The probability that a sample of 4 has at least one defective bulb is exactly 276/800276/800.
  3. About 276/800276/800 is an estimate of the probability a random sample of 4 bulbs contains at least one defective bulb, assuming independence and defect rate 0.100.10. (correct answer)
  4. Because digits 0–9 were used, the probability depends on the number 10.
  5. The next 800 samples of 4 bulbs will include exactly 276 samples with a defect.

Explanation: Estimating probabilities using simulation in AP Statistics is demonstrated here by modeling defective bulbs with random digits, where 0 represents a defect in samples of 4, repeated over 800 trials to get 276 with at least one defect. This setup assumes independence and a 0.10 defect rate, using repeated trials to approximate the complement of all good bulbs. A distractor is choice B, which asserts the probability is exact, but simulation results are estimates that could change with different runs. In a mini-lesson, simulation replicates stochastic processes by assigning outcomes to random numbers, tallying results over many trials to estimate probabilities, ideal for hypergeometric or binomial scenarios. It highlights the law of large numbers, where more trials yield better estimates. Choice C is correct, as it properly frames the result as an estimate under the assumptions.

Question 4

A quality engineer models a day's production by simulation: each item independently has a 0.03 probability of being defective. The engineer uses a random number generator to simulate 200 days of producing 100 items per day, counting a "success" when a day has 5 or more defectives. The simulation produced 38 successes out of 200 days. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct for estimating the probability that a real day has 5 or more defectives?

  1. The probability is exactly 38/20038/200 because simulation gives the true probability when the model is correct.
  2. About 38/20038/200 is a reasonable estimate of the probability that a day has 5 or more defectives under this model. (correct answer)
  3. The probability that any single item is defective is 38/20038/200.
  4. Because 200 days were simulated, the probability must be 38%38\% for every set of 200 real days.
  5. The probability cannot be estimated without simulating every possible set of 100 items.

Explanation: This question assesses the skill of estimating probabilities using simulation in AP Statistics. The simulation involves repeated trials where each trial mimics a day of production with 100 items, each having a 0.03 chance of being defective, and counts days with 5 or more defectives across 200 trials, yielding 38 such days. This proportion, 38/200, provides an approximate estimate of the probability under the model, as simulations use many trials to approximate true probabilities through the law of large numbers. A common distractor, like choice A, incorrectly claims the probability is exactly 38/200, but simulations give estimates, not exact values, due to inherent randomness. In a mini-lesson on simulation, remember that we model real-world processes with random number generators to replicate independent events, run numerous trials to observe outcomes, and use the relative frequency of the event as our probability estimate; more trials generally improve accuracy.

Question 5

A student estimates the probability that a randomly selected day has at least 3 late buses. The student assumes each bus is late independently with probability 0.10 and that 25 buses run each day. The student simulates 1000 days by generating 25 random two-digit numbers per day (00–09 = late, 10–99 = on time) and counts days with 3 or more late buses. The simulation finds 468 such days. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The probability that a bus is late is estimated to be 468/1000468/1000.
  2. The estimated probability that a day has at least 3 late buses is about 468/1000468/1000 under the assumptions. (correct answer)
  3. The probability is exactly 0.4680.468 because the simulation used 1000 days.
  4. The simulation shows that the next day will have at least 3 late buses with probability 0.468 regardless of the assumptions.
  5. The simulation is invalid because a day with 2 late buses should count as a success half the time.

Explanation: Estimating probabilities using simulation is the AP Statistics skill applied to bus lateness here. The student simulated 1000 days with 25 buses each (00-09 late for 0.10), finding 468 days with at least 3 lates, estimating about 468/1000 under the assumptions. Repeated trials simulate the process many times, using relative frequency to approximate the probability effectively. Choice A distracts by interpreting it as the single-bus probability, but the simulation estimates the group event, not individual; confusing levels is common. In a simulation mini-lesson: define probabilities (10/100 for late), use random numbers for each unit, aggregate per trial (day), check the condition, replicate extensively, and interpret the proportion as the estimate; assumptions like independence are crucial for validity.

Question 6

A teacher wants to estimate the probability that, when 3 students are chosen at random (independently) from a large school where 40% are in 9th grade, at least one of the 3 is a 9th grader. The teacher simulates 10,000 selections by generating 3 random digits 0–9 per trial and letting 0–3 represent "9th grader." The simulation produced 7,844 trials with at least one 9th grader. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The probability is exactly 0.7844 because 10,000 trials is enough to make the result exact.
  2. The probability is 100007844\frac{10000}{7844} because the simulation had 7,844 successes.
  3. The estimated probability of at least one 9th grader is about 784410000\frac{7844}{10000} for the simulation model, and using more trials would typically yield an estimate closer to the true probability. (correct answer)
  4. The simulation is invalid unless exactly 40% of the generated digits are 0, 1, 2, or 3.
  5. The result guarantees that in the next 10,000 real selections of 3 students, exactly 7,844 will include at least one 9th grader.

Explanation: This question tests simulation interpretation for school selection probability. The teacher simulated 10,000 selections of 3 students where digits 0-3 represent 9th graders (40% probability), finding 7,844 trials with at least one 9th grader. This estimates the probability as 7844/10000 = 0.7844. Choice C correctly recognizes this as an estimate that would approach the true probability with more trials. Choice A wrongly claims exactness, B inverts the fraction, D misunderstands that randomness doesn't require exact 40% in finite samples, and E treats simulation as prediction. Simulation provides probability estimates through repeated random trials; the theoretical probability here is 1-(0.6)^3 = 0.784, very close to the simulation result.

Question 7

A student wants to estimate the probability that when rolling a fair six-sided die 4 times, the number 6 appears at least once. The student simulates 2,000 sets of 4 rolls using a random number generator that produces integers 1–6 with equal probability, and counts a "success" if at least one roll is a 6. The simulation produced 1,022 successes. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The probability is exactly 10222000\frac{1022}{2000} because the die is fair and the simulation used a correct generator.
  2. The estimated probability of at least one 6 is about 10222000\frac{1022}{2000}, and the estimate would typically become more accurate with many more simulated sets of 4 rolls. (correct answer)
  3. The next 2,000 real sets of 4 rolls will contain exactly 1,022 sets with at least one 6.
  4. The simulation is invalid unless each face 1–6 appears exactly the same number of times across all simulated rolls.
  5. The probability is 20001022\frac{2000}{1022} because 1,022 is the number of successes.

Explanation: This question tests basic simulation interpretation for dice probability. The student simulated 2,000 sets of 4 die rolls and found 1,022 sets with at least one 6, estimating the probability as 1022/2000 ≈ 0.511. Choice B correctly interprets this as an estimate that would become more accurate with more trials. Choice A wrongly claims exactness, C treats simulation as prediction of exact future outcomes, D misunderstands that randomness doesn't require perfect uniformity in finite samples, and E inverts the fraction. Simulation estimates probability through repeated random trials; as the number of trials increases, the estimate typically converges to the true theoretical probability (which for this problem is 1-(5/6)^4 ≈ 0.518).

Question 8

A traffic engineer models whether a car runs a particular yellow light as a Bernoulli event with probability 0.18, independent from car to car. She wants to estimate the probability that, among the next 8 cars, at least 2 run the light. She simulates 1500 trials by generating 8 random two-digit numbers (00–99) per trial and counting a run if the number is 00–17. The simulation produced 392 trials with at least 2 runs. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The probability a car runs the light is approximately 392/1500392/1500.
  2. The probability that at least 2 of 8 cars run the light is approximately 392/1500392/1500. (correct answer)
  3. Exactly 392 of the next 1500 groups of 8 cars will have at least 2 runs.
  4. The simulation result must be wrong because probabilities like 0.18 cannot be simulated with 00–99.
  5. Because the simulation used independence, the probability must be the same for at least 1 run and at least 2 runs.

Explanation: This question tests interpretation of simulation results for traffic modeling. The engineer correctly simulated an 18% probability by using numbers 00-17 out of 00-99 (18 numbers = 18%). She ran 1500 trials of 8 cars each, finding 392 trials where at least 2 cars ran the light. Choice A misinterprets this as a single-car probability, while C makes an exact prediction about future groups. Choice D incorrectly claims 18% can't be simulated with two-digit numbers, and E makes a nonsensical claim about independence. The simulation provides an estimate of 392/1500 for the probability that at least 2 out of 8 cars run the light, which is the compound event being studied, not the individual 18% probability.

Question 9

A game uses a fair six-sided die. A player wins if the sum of 3 rolls is at least 14. To estimate the probability of winning, a student simulates 1000 trials: each trial consists of generating 3 random integers 1–6, summing them, and recording whether the sum is at least 14. The student gets 216 wins. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The probability of winning is exactly 0.2160.216 because 216 wins occurred.
  2. The estimated probability of winning is about 216/1000216/1000, and it would likely get closer to the true probability with more trials. (correct answer)
  3. The die is not fair because the simulation did not produce exactly the theoretical probability.
  4. The simulation shows that the sum of 3 rolls is at least 14 on exactly 216 of the next 1000 real games.
  5. The simulation result means that the average sum of 3 rolls is 216.

Explanation: This AP Statistics skill of estimating probabilities using simulation applies to dice games, where summing three rolls and checking for at least 14 was simulated 1000 times, yielding 216 wins as an estimate. Repeated trials help average out variability, providing a closer approximation to the true probability of winning with a fair die. Distractor A claims exactness from the 216 wins, but simulations are empirical estimates, not theoretical certainties. Mini-lesson on simulation: it models discrete uniform distributions like die rolls by generating random values, computing outcomes per trial, and using the success proportion over repetitions to estimate probabilities. This is useful for multinomial problems where enumeration is impractical. The correct choice is B, noting the estimate and that more trials would refine it.

Question 10

A hospital reports that 30%30\% of patients arriving at the emergency department are admitted. An administrator simulates an hour in which 8 patients arrive by generating random integers 1–10 for each patient and counting "admitted" when the number is 1–3. One trial is 8 patients; the administrator repeats 1500 trials to estimate the probability that at least 4 of the 8 are admitted. The simulation shows 296 trials with at least 4 admissions. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The probability of at least 4 admissions is 4/84/8 because 4 admissions are required.
  2. The probability of at least 4 admissions is exactly 296/1500296/1500 because 1500 trials is a large number.
  3. About 296/1500296/1500 is an estimate of the probability that at least 4 of 8 patients are admitted, assuming each patient's admission is independent with probability 0.300.30. (correct answer)
  4. The simulation means that 296 of the 1500 simulated patients were admitted.
  5. The next hour with 8 patients will have at least 4 admissions with probability 0.300.30.

Explanation: In AP Statistics, estimating probabilities using simulation is used here for hospital admissions, with numbers 1-3 for admission out of 10, simulated over 1500 trials of 8 patients, yielding 296 with at least 4 admissions. Repeated trials assume independence to approximate overload risks. Choice B is a distractor, asserting exactness from the large trial count, but simulations always estimate, with precision improving but not guaranteeing exactness. A mini-lesson: assign random numbers to probabilities, simulate groups, count qualifying trials, and estimate via proportion, assuming the model like 0.30 independence. This aids in resource planning. The correct interpretation is C, as it describes the estimate with the independence and probability assumptions.

Question 11

A jar contains 3 red and 7 blue marbles. A student wants to estimate the probability that, when drawing 4 marbles without replacement, at least 2 are red. To simulate, the student uses 10 cards labeled R,R,R,B,B,B,B,B,B,B, shuffles, draws the top 4 as one trial, records whether at least 2 are R, replaces the cards, and repeats 400 trials. The student observes 88 successes. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The probability is exactly 88/40088/400 because the simulation used physical cards.
  2. The simulation estimates the probability of at least 2 red marbles in 4 draws without replacement to be about 88/40088/400. (correct answer)
  3. The jar must contain exactly 88 red marbles out of 400 marbles.
  4. In the long run, exactly 88 of every 400 sets of 4 draws will have at least 2 red marbles.
  5. Because marbles are drawn without replacement, simulation cannot be used to estimate the probability.

Explanation: This question in AP Statistics involves estimating probabilities using simulation for hypergeometric draws without replacement, modeled by shuffling cards and drawing 4, repeated 400 times with replacement between trials, yielding 88 successes. The repeated trials, despite the without-replacement within each, provide an estimate by averaging over many shuffles. Distractor E wrongly states simulation can't be used without replacement, but it can accurately model it via physical or digital replication. Mini-lesson on simulation: for dependent events like draws without replacement, use tools like cards to mimic the population, record outcomes per trial, and estimate via proportion over repetitions. This contrasts with independent models. Choice B is correct, as it frames the result as an approximate probability estimate.

Question 12

A school counselor believes that 40% of students prefer online appointments. To estimate the probability that in a random sample of 12 students, at least 7 prefer online appointments, a student runs a simulation: for each trial, generate 12 random digits where 0–3 represent "online" and 4–9 represent "not online," then count whether the trial has 7 or more online. After 1000 trials, 271 trials met the condition. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The probability that a single student prefers online appointments is 271/1000271/1000.
  2. The probability that at least 7 of 12 prefer online is approximately 271/1000271/1000. (correct answer)
  3. The probability is exactly 0.2710.271 because 1000 trials guarantees the true probability.
  4. Because 271 trials were successes, exactly 271 of the next 1000 real samples will have at least 7 online.
  5. The simulation is incorrect because it should use 0–4 for "online" to represent 40%.

Explanation: This AP Statistics question tests estimating probabilities using simulation for binomial-like scenarios. The simulation runs 1000 trials, each generating 12 random digits to represent student preferences (0-3 for online, matching 40%), and finds 271 trials with at least 7 online preferences, estimating the probability as approximately 271/1000. Repeated trials help approximate the probability by observing the frequency of the event under the assumed model. A distractor like choice C claims the probability is exactly 0.271 because of 1000 trials, but simulations yield estimates that can vary; exactness requires infinite trials or direct calculation. Mini-lesson on simulation: identify the probability (0.40 here), choose a random mechanism (digits 0-9), define success (at least 7), perform many trials, and compute the relative frequency as the estimate; this method is useful when direct binomial probability calculations are tedious.

Question 13

A wildlife biologist models whether a tagged bird returns to a nesting site each year as independent with probability 0.70. To estimate the probability that in the next 5 years the bird returns in at least 4 of them, the biologist simulates 10,000 sequences of 5 years using random two-digit numbers (00–69 = return, 70–99 = not return). The simulation shows 5294 sequences with at least 4 returns. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The probability of at least 4 returns in 5 years is approximately 5294/100005294/10000 under the model. (correct answer)
  2. The probability of a return in any given year is approximately 5294/100005294/10000.
  3. The probability is exactly 0.52940.5294 because 10,000 trials eliminates all randomness.
  4. Because 5294 trials were successes, the bird will return in at least 4 of the next 5 years.
  5. The simulation is invalid because 00–69 includes 69 numbers, not 70.

Explanation: In AP Statistics, this question evaluates estimating probabilities using simulation for bird return patterns. The biologist simulated 10,000 sequences of 5 years (00-69 return for 0.70), finding 5294 with at least 4 returns, estimating the probability as approximately 5294/10000 under the model. Repeated trials build a distribution of outcomes, allowing the proportion to estimate the true probability effectively. Choice E is a distractor claiming invalidity because 00-69 is 70 numbers (which is correct for 70/100=0.70), but it's actually valid; miscounting codes is a common error. For a simulation mini-lesson: select a random tool (two-digit numbers), map ranges to probabilities accurately, simulate each period independently, evaluate the criterion per sequence, repeat many times, and use the success frequency as the estimate; large trials like 10,000 enhance precision.

Question 14

A game involves drawing 3 cards without replacement from a standard 52-card deck. You win if you get at least 2 hearts. A student estimates the probability of winning by simulation: for each trial, the student shuffles a virtual deck, draws 3 cards, records whether the trial is a win, and repeats for 5000 trials. The simulation reports 820 wins. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The estimated probability of winning is about 820/5000820/5000. (correct answer)
  2. The probability of winning is exactly 820/5000820/5000 because 5000 trials is large.
  3. The probability of drawing a heart on the first card is about 820/5000820/5000.
  4. Because there were 820 wins, the next 820 trials would also be wins.
  5. The simulation result is invalid because shuffling changes the probability from trial to trial.

Explanation: In AP Statistics, this problem focuses on estimating probabilities using simulation for a card game scenario. The student conducted 5000 repeated trials, each simulating drawing 3 cards without replacement and checking for at least 2 hearts, resulting in 820 wins, so the estimate is about 820/5000. This approach leverages repeated simulations to approximate the winning probability, as exact calculation might be complex. Choice B is a distractor because it asserts the probability is exactly 820/5000 due to the large number of trials, but even large simulations provide approximations, not exact values, since randomness persists. For a mini-lesson on simulation: define the components (like shuffling and drawing), assign probabilities (based on deck composition), run many independent trials, record the proportion of successes, and interpret it as an estimate; here, virtual shuffling ensures each trial is fair and independent.

Question 15

A restaurant manager assumes each customer independently leaves a tip of at least 20% with probability 0.55. To estimate the probability that among 8 customers, at least 6 leave a tip of at least 20%, a student simulates 2000 groups of 8 customers (using random digits 0–4 for "no" and 5–9 for "yes"). The simulation produced 612 groups with at least 6 "yes." Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The probability a customer tips at least 20% is estimated as 612/2000612/2000.
  2. The probability that at least 6 of 8 customers tip at least 20% is about 612/2000612/2000. (correct answer)
  3. Because 2000 is large, the probability must be exactly 0.3060.306.
  4. The simulation result would be the same every time if repeated with 2000 trials.
  5. The simulation estimates the probability that exactly 6 customers tip at least 20%.

Explanation: This AP Statistics problem involves estimating probabilities using simulation for customer tipping behavior. The student ran 2000 trials, each with 8 customers (digits 0-4 no, 5-9 yes for 0.55 probability), finding 612 groups with at least 6 yeses, so the estimate is about 612/2000. By using repeated trials, the simulation approximates the probability of the compound event under the independence assumption. A common distractor, choice C, suggests exactness due to the large sample, but simulations always provide approximations because of sampling variation. Mini-lesson on simulation: assign digits to outcomes proportionally (5/10 for yes), simulate each group's outcomes independently, check the condition per trial, conduct many trials, and calculate the proportion; this technique estimates probabilities when binomial formulas are cumbersome for 'at least' scenarios.

Question 16

A call center models the probability a customer call is resolved on the first attempt as 0.4, independently across calls. A supervisor wants to estimate the probability that in the next 6 calls, exactly 3 are resolved on the first attempt. She simulates 10,000 trials; in each trial she generates 6 random digits (0–9), lets 0–3 represent "resolved" and 4–9 represent "not resolved," and counts how often exactly 3 resolved. The simulation produced 2768 trials with exactly 3 resolved. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The probability a single call is resolved is approximately 2768/100002768/10000.
  2. The probability that exactly 3 of 6 calls are resolved is approximately 2768/100002768/10000. (correct answer)
  3. Exactly 2768 of the next 10,000 sets of 6 calls will have exactly 3 resolved.
  4. The probability is exactly 2768/100002768/10000 because 10,000 trials is large enough to remove sampling variability.
  5. The simulation is flawed because 0–3 represents 4 digits, which cannot model a probability of 0.4.

Explanation: This question assesses understanding of simulation interpretation for exact count probabilities. The supervisor correctly modeled a 40% resolution rate using digits 0-3 out of 0-9 (4 digits = 40%). She simulated 10,000 sets of 6 calls, counting trials where exactly 3 were resolved, finding 2768 such trials. Choice A misinterprets this as a single-call probability, while C makes a deterministic prediction. Choice D incorrectly claims large simulations eliminate variability entirely, and E wrongly suggests the digit mapping is flawed. The simulation estimates the probability of exactly 3 out of 6 calls being resolved as approximately 2768/10,000, which is a specific compound event different from the individual 40% resolution rate.

Question 17

A basketball player makes a free throw with probability 0.7 on each attempt. A coach wants to estimate the probability the player makes at least 4 out of 5 free throws. The coach simulates 8,000 sets of 5 shots by generating random two-digit numbers 00–99 for each shot and letting 00–69 represent "make." The simulation produced 4,639 sets with at least 4 makes. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The probability of at least 4 makes is exactly 46398000\frac{4639}{8000} because the random-number method guarantees the true probability.
  2. The estimated probability of at least 4 makes is about 46398000\frac{4639}{8000} for this model, and repeating with more than 8,000 trials would likely give a more stable estimate. (correct answer)
  3. The player will make at least 4 of the next 5 free throws with certainty because the simulation shows it happens more than half the time.
  4. The simulation is invalid unless exactly 70% of the generated numbers are between 00 and 69.
  5. The probability is 80004639\frac{8000}{4639} because the simulation counted 4,639 successes.

Explanation: This question involves simulating binomial probability for free throw success. The coach simulated 8,000 sets of 5 shots using random numbers 00-99, where 00-69 represents a made shot (70% probability), finding 4,639 sets with at least 4 makes. This gives an estimated probability of 4639/8000 ≈ 0.580. Choice B correctly recognizes this as an estimate that would stabilize with more trials. Choice A wrongly claims exactness, C misinterprets probability as certainty, D misunderstands that we expect approximately 70% makes overall but not exactly, and E inverts the fraction. Simulation estimates probabilities through repeated trials of random experiments, with accuracy improving as trial count increases according to the law of large numbers.

Question 18

A multiple-choice quiz has 5 questions with 4 answer choices each. A student guesses randomly on every question. To estimate the probability of getting at least 3 correct, a student runs a simulation: for each question generate a random integer 1–4, count "correct" when the number is 1, record whether at least 3 of the 5 are correct, and repeat 2000 trials. The simulation produced 231 successes. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The probability of at least 3 correct is exactly 231/2000231/2000 because guessing is random.
  2. The simulation estimates the probability of at least 3 correct when randomly guessing to be about 231/2000231/2000. (correct answer)
  3. The student will get at least 3 correct on exactly 231 of the next 2000 quizzes.
  4. Because there are 4 choices, the probability of at least 3 correct must be 3/43/4.
  5. The simulation shows the student knows 231 of the 2000 questions.

Explanation: This AP Statistics topic of estimating probabilities using simulation models quiz guessing with random 1-4 where 1 is correct, repeated 2000 times for 5 questions, producing 231 trials with at least 3 correct. The large number of repeated trials gives a reliable estimate of guessing success under the 1/4 probability. Distractor A claims exactness because guessing is random, but randomness means results are estimates varying by run. Mini-lesson: simulation for multiple trials involves generating outcomes per event, checking conditions, and using success rates over many repetitions to estimate, perfect for binomial guessing models. It demonstrates expected values empirically. Choice B is correct, properly presenting the result as an approximate probability estimate for random guessing.

Question 19

A shipping company reports that 6%6\% of packages are delayed. A manager simulates 20-package days using two-digit random numbers 00–99, counting a delay when the number is 00–05. One trial represents 20 packages; the manager repeats 2000 trials to estimate the probability of at least 3 delays in a day. The simulation produced 418 trials with at least 3 delays. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. About 418/2000418/2000 is a reasonable estimate of the probability of at least 3 delays in 20 packages, given a 6%6\% delay rate. (correct answer)
  2. The exact probability of at least 3 delays is 418/2000418/2000 because the simulation used 2000 trials.
  3. The company will have at least 3 delays on exactly 418 of the next 2000 days.
  4. The probability of at least 3 delays is 3×0.063 \times 0.06 because 3 delays are required.
  5. The simulation result means 418 packages out of 2000 are delayed.

Explanation: This AP Statistics question focuses on estimating probabilities using simulation to model package delays with a 6% rate, using random numbers to simulate daily outcomes. The manager conducted 2000 trials, each representing 20 packages with delays for numbers 00-05, resulting in 418 trials with at least 3 delays, offering an estimate of the probability. Distractor B claims the probability is exact due to the number of trials, but simulations always provide approximations, not exact values, even with large samples. Mini-lesson on simulation: it involves defining a random mechanism (like digit assignment) to mimic events, repeating trials to calculate the proportion of successes, which estimates the true probability under the model. This is particularly helpful for Poisson-like processes or when direct calculation is tedious. The correct interpretation is A, as it reasonably states the estimate with the given delay rate.

Question 20

A website claims that 40%40\% of visitors click an advertisement. A student simulates 15 visitors by generating random integers 1–10 for each visitor and counting a click when the number is 1–4. One trial is 15 simulated visitors; the student repeats 600 trials to estimate the probability of at least 9 clicks. The simulation shows 52 trials with at least 9 clicks. Which interpretation of the simulation results is correct?

  1. The probability of at least 9 clicks is exactly 52/60052/600 because 600 trials were run.
  2. About 52/60052/600 is an estimate of the probability of at least 9 clicks among 15 visitors, assuming each visitor clicks independently with probability 0.400.40. (correct answer)
  3. The ad will get at least 9 clicks on exactly 52 of the next 600 days.
  4. The probability of at least 9 clicks is 9/159/15 because 9 clicks are needed.
  5. The simulation proves the click rate is greater than 40%40\%.

Explanation: In AP Statistics, estimating probabilities using simulation is shown by modeling ad clicks with random numbers 1-4 for success out of 10, repeated over 600 trials of 15 visitors, resulting in 52 trials with at least 9 clicks. These repeated trials under the 0.40 click assumption allow for an empirical probability estimate. Choice A is a distractor, claiming exactness due to trial count, but simulations provide approximations subject to random variation. A mini-lesson: simulation assigns probabilities to random outcomes, replicates scenarios many times, and computes the fraction of desired events to estimate likelihoods, assuming independence as here. It's effective for binomial thresholds. The correct interpretation is B, as it describes the estimate with the independence and rate assumptions.