On , for , , and for ; which could be ?
Opening subject page...
Loading your content
AP Calculus BC Quiz
Practice Sketching Graphs Of Functions And Derivatives in AP Calculus BC with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.
Question 1 / 20
0 of 20 answered
On [−3,3], f′(x)>0 for x<0, f′(0)=0, and f′(x)<0 for x>0; which could be f?
This quiz focuses on Sketching Graphs Of Functions And Derivatives, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for AP Calculus BC.
Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.
On [−3,3], f′(x)>0 for x<0, f′(0)=0, and f′(x)<0 for x>0; which could be f?
Explanation: This question tests graph-derivative reasoning, particularly interpreting the sign of the derivative to determine the function's monotonicity and extrema. Given f'>0 for x<0, f'(0)=0, and f'<0 for x>0, f is increasing left of 0 up to a local maximum at x=0, then decreasing right of 0. This sign pattern around x=0 confirms a change from positive to negative derivative, hallmark of a local maximum. The behavior holds on the closed interval [-3,3] without additional critical points implied. A tempting distractor like choice B fails because it describes a local minimum, which would require f' to change from negative to positive at x=0, opposite the given signs. To check sketches transferably, use a sign chart for f' to map out increasing and decreasing intervals and identify extremum types at zeros.
The graph of f has local maxima at x=−2,2 and a local minimum at x=0; which could be f′(x)?
Explanation: This question tests your ability to translate between a function's critical points and its derivative's zeros. Since f has local maxima at x = -2 and x = 2, f' must equal zero at these points, and since f has a local minimum at x = 0, f' must also equal zero there. At a local maximum, f' changes from positive to negative (function goes from increasing to decreasing), so f' must cross from positive to negative at x = -2 and x = 2. At a local minimum, f' changes from negative to positive, so f' must cross from negative to positive at x = 0. This gives us the sign pattern: negative for x < -2, positive for -2 < x < 0, negative for 0 < x < 2, and positive for x > 2, which matches choice C. Choice B incorrectly has f' positive for x < -2, which would make f increasing before the first maximum. When sketching derivatives from extrema, always check that the derivative's sign changes match the type of extremum: positive-to-negative for maxima, negative-to-positive for minima.
The graph of f′(x) is an upward-opening parabola with zeros at x=−1 and x=3; which could be f?
Explanation: This question tests graph-derivative reasoning, focusing on deducing the function's behavior from the shape and zeros of its derivative graph. An upward-opening parabola for f' with zeros at x=-1 and x=3 means f' is negative between these roots and positive outside, indicating f decreases on (-1,3) and increases elsewhere. This creates a local maximum at x=-1 where f switches from increasing to decreasing, and a local minimum at x=3 where it switches back to increasing. The parabolic shape ensures smooth transitions without additional zeros or discontinuities. A tempting distractor like choice B fails because it reverses the intervals, suggesting f increases between -1 and 3 while decreasing outside, which would require f' to be positive inside and negative outside, contradicting an upward-opening parabola. To check sketches transferably, integrate the derivative's sign and shape mentally to predict the function's monotonicity and extrema.
The graph of f has local maxima at x=−2,2 and a local minimum at x=0; which could be f′(x)?
Explanation: This question tests graph-derivative reasoning, specifically identifying the graph of the derivative from the function's critical points and their nature. Local maxima on f occur where f' changes from positive to negative, while local minima occur where f' changes from negative to positive. Here, for local maxima at x=-2 and x=2, f' must switch from positive to negative at those points, and for the local minimum at x=0, it must switch from negative to positive. A cubic polynomial for f' with roots at x=-2,0,2 and the sign pattern (+,-,+,-) aligns with these changes, as it starts positive left of -2, becomes negative between -2 and 0, positive between 0 and 2, and negative right of 2. A tempting distractor like choice A fails because its sign pattern (-,+,-,+) would instead produce local minima at x=-2 and x=2 with a maximum at x=0, reversing the given extremum types. To check sketches transferably, always apply the first derivative test by plotting sign changes around critical points to confirm monotonicity intervals.
A function f decreases on (−2,0) and increases on (0,5), and is concave up for x>0; which could be f′?
Explanation: This problem combines monotonicity and concavity information to determine the derivative's graph. Since f decreases on (-2, 0) and increases on (0, 5), we know f'(x) < 0 for -2 < x < 0 and f'(x) > 0 for 0 < x < 5, with f'(0) = 0. Additionally, f is concave up for x > 0, meaning f'' > 0 for x > 0, which tells us f' is increasing for x > 0. An increasing line crossing the x-axis at x = 0 satisfies all conditions: it's negative before x = 0, positive after x = 0, and always increasing. Choice B (decreasing line) would make f concave down everywhere, contradicting the given concavity. To find f' from combined information, first mark where f' = 0 from extrema, then use monotonicity for f's sign pattern and concavity for whether f' increases or decreases.
A graph of f′(x) touches the x-axis at x=0 without crossing, and f′(x)>0 for x=0. Which could be f?
Explanation: This question involves a subtle case where f' touches but doesn't cross the x-axis. Since f'(x) > 0 for all x ≠ 0 and f'(0) = 0, the function f is always increasing (never decreasing). The fact that f' only touches the x-axis at x=0 means f' doesn't change sign there—it remains non-negative. This creates a horizontal tangent at x=0 without an extremum, similar to y = x³ at the origin. Choice A incorrectly identifies this as a local maximum, missing that f continues to increase through x=0. When f' touches the x-axis without crossing, check whether f' changes sign: if not, there's no extremum despite the horizontal tangent.
The graph of f is increasing on (−∞,2) and decreasing on (2,∞). Which could represent f′(x)?
Explanation: This problem asks you to deduce the derivative's behavior from the original function's monotonicity. Since f is increasing on (-∞,2), we know f'(x) ≥ 0 for x < 2, with f'(x) > 0 except possibly at isolated points. Since f is decreasing on (2,∞), we know f'(x) ≤ 0 for x > 2, with f'(x) < 0 except possibly at isolated points. At x=2, where f changes from increasing to decreasing, f must have a local maximum, so f'(2) = 0. Therefore, f'(x) is positive for x < 2, zero at x = 2, and negative for x > 2. Choice A incorrectly has f'(x) negative for x < 2, which would make f decreasing there instead of increasing. Always verify that your derivative's sign matches the function's increasing/decreasing behavior.
If f has a horizontal tangent at x=0 and is increasing on both sides of 0, which could be true about f′(x) near 0?
Explanation: This question tests graph-derivative reasoning by exploring how f' behaves around a horizontal tangent while maintaining monotonicity in f. A horizontal tangent at x = 0 means f'(0) = 0, and f increasing on both sides requires f' ≥ 0 nearby with no sign change. Thus, f' can be positive for x ≠ 0 near 0 and zero at 0, allowing f to increase through the point without an extremum. This is possible even if f' approaches 0 from positive values on both sides. A tempting distractor like choice A fails because changing from positive to negative would create a local maximum in f, contradicting the increasing on both sides. To check sketches, confirm that no sign change in f' around a zero maintains monotonicity in f, while verifying tangent conditions.
The graph of f is concave up on (−∞,1) and concave down on (1,∞); which could be f′(x)?
Explanation: This question tests graph-derivative reasoning, specifically recognizing how the concavity of the function relates to the monotonicity of its derivative. Concave up on (-∞,1) means f''>0 there, so f' is increasing; concave down on (1,∞) means f''<0, so f' is decreasing, implying f' has a local maximum at x=1. An inflection point at x=1 occurs where f'' changes sign, consistent with f' reaching a peak. This setup allows f' to be positive or negative but must reflect the monotonicity shift. A tempting distractor like choice B fails because it would require f' to have a local minimum at x=1, which would correspond to f'' changing from positive to negative in reverse, not matching the concavity. To check sketches transferably, analyze the sign of the second derivative to determine where the first derivative increases or decreases.
A graph of f′(x) crosses the x-axis at x=−1 and x=2, is positive between, and negative outside. Which could be f?
Explanation: This question tests your ability to translate between a derivative graph and the original function's behavior. Since f'(x) crosses the x-axis at x=-1 and x=2, these are critical points where f has horizontal tangents. When f'(x) > 0 (between -1 and 2), the function f is increasing; when f'(x) < 0 (outside this interval), f is decreasing. This means f decreases until x=-1, increases from x=-1 to x=2, then decreases again, creating a local minimum at x=-1 and a local maximum at x=2. Choice C incorrectly reverses the increasing/decreasing intervals by confusing the derivative's sign with the function's behavior. To verify your sketch, check that f' changes from negative to positive at local minima and from positive to negative at local maxima.
The graph of f′(x) is a line with negative slope crossing the x-axis at x=2; which could be f?
Explanation: This question tests graph-derivative reasoning, linking the derivative's linear form to the function's quadratic shape and concavity. A line for f' with negative slope crossing at x=2 means f' changes from positive to negative at x=2, so f has a maximum there, and constant negative f'' implies concave down everywhere. Integrating yields a downward-opening parabola with vertex at x=2, matching the maximum and concavity. The linear f' ensures no other critical points or inflection points. A tempting distractor like choice A fails because a concave-up parabola would require positive f'', but the negative slope of f' gives negative f''. To check sketches transferably, compute the second derivative from the slope of the first to verify concavity direction.
A graph of f has a local minimum at x=−3 and an inflection point at x=1; which could be f′(x)?
Explanation: This question tests graph-derivative reasoning, connecting the function's extrema and inflections to features in the derivative graph. A local minimum at x=-3 requires f'(-3)=0 with f' changing from negative to positive there. An inflection at x=1 means f''(1)=0 with f'' changing sign, which translates to f' having a local extremum at x=1, as local extrema of f' occur where its derivative f'' changes sign at zero. This pairs the zero and the extremum appropriately in f'. A tempting distractor like choice B fails because it reverses the features, placing the zero at the inflection point instead of the extremum. To check sketches transferably, remember that inflections in f correspond to extrema in f', while extrema in f correspond to zeros in f'.
A function f has critical points at x=−1 and x=3; f decreases on (−1,3) and increases elsewhere. Which could be f′(x)?
Explanation: This question tests graph-derivative reasoning by relating critical points and monotonicity intervals of f to the signs and zeros of f'. Critical points occur where f' = 0, and decreasing intervals of f correspond to f' < 0, while increasing intervals mean f' > 0. The decrease on (-1,3) requires f' < 0 there, increases elsewhere require f' > 0 outside, and critical points at -1 and 3 imply f' zeros there with sign changes. This results in f' positive for x < -1, negative on (-1,3), and positive for x > 3, matching the monotonicity. A tempting distractor like choice A fails because it has f' positive on (-1,3), which would make f increasing there instead of decreasing. To check sketches, ensure zeros of f' align with critical points of f and that the signs of f' match the increasing or decreasing behavior in the specified intervals.
A function f is concave up on (0,2) and concave down on (2,5), and f′(2)=3; which could be f′(x)?
Explanation: This question tests graph-derivative reasoning by linking concavity changes in f to monotonicity shifts in f'. Concave up on (0,2) means f'' > 0, so f' is increasing there, and concave down on (2,5) means f'' < 0, so f' is decreasing there. The change at x = 2 implies a local maximum in f' at 2, consistent with increasing before and decreasing after. The condition f'(2) = 3 specifies a positive value at that point, which fits without requiring a zero. A tempting distractor like choice A fails because decreasing on (0,2) would imply f'' < 0 and concave down, opposite to the given concave up. To check sketches, align increasing segments of f' with concave up regions of f and decreasing segments with concave down, noting points of change for potential extrema in f'.
A graph of f crosses the x-axis at x=0 and has a horizontal tangent there without changing sign; which could be f?
Explanation: This question tests graph-derivative reasoning, particularly identifying function graphs with specific tangent and sign properties at a point. A horizontal tangent at x=0 means f'(0)=0, and crossing the x-axis without changing sign implies f touches zero at x=0 but remains non-negative or non-positive around it. An upward-opening parabola tangent at x=0 fits, as its vertex provides the horizontal tangent and it stays positive elsewhere without sign change. This setup ensures f(0)=0 and f'(0)=0 without crossing to negative values. A tempting distractor like choice A fails because a line with nonzero slope crosses the x-axis and changes sign, violating the no-sign-change condition. To check sketches transferably, evaluate the function's values around the point to confirm tangency and sign consistency.
A graph of f has horizontal tangents at x=−2,1; it increases on (−∞,−2), decreases on (−2,1), then increases. Which could be f′(x)?
Explanation: This problem requires translating the function's behavior into the derivative's sign pattern. Horizontal tangents at x=-2 and x=1 mean f'(-2) = 0 and f'(1) = 0. Since f increases on (-∞,-2), we have f'(x) > 0 for x < -2. Since f decreases on (-2,1), we have f'(x) < 0 for -2 < x < 1. Since f increases on (1,∞), we have f'(x) > 0 for x > 1. This creates the pattern: positive, zero at -2, negative, zero at 1, positive. Choice A incorrectly has f' negative for x < -2 and x > 1, which would make f decrease in those regions instead of increase. To verify derivative sketches, ensure the sign of f' matches whether f is increasing (positive) or decreasing (negative) in each interval.
A differentiable f is concave up on (-,0) and concave down on (0,3), with f′(1)=0; which could be f′(x)?
Explanation: This question tests graph-derivative reasoning by connecting concavity of f to the monotonicity of f'. Concave up regions in f correspond to f'' > 0, meaning f' is increasing there, while concave down regions mean f'' < 0, so f' is decreasing. For f concave up on (-1,0), f' increases on that interval, and concave down on (0,3), f' decreases there, with the change at x = 0 implying a local extremum in f' at 0. The condition f'(1) = 0 adds a zero in f' within the concave down interval, which is consistent as long as the overall monotonicity of f' aligns with the concavity. A tempting distractor like choice A fails because it has f' decreasing on (-1,0), which would imply f'' < 0 and concave down, opposite to the given concave up. To check sketches, match increasing intervals of f' with concave up regions of f and decreasing intervals of f' with concave down regions, verifying any specified values or points.
The graph of f′(x) is positive for x<0, negative for 0<x<4, and positive for x>4; which could be f?
Explanation: This question tests interpreting a derivative's sign to determine a function's behavior. When f'(x) > 0, the function f is increasing, and when f'(x) < 0, f is decreasing. Given that f' is positive for x < 0, f increases on (-∞, 0); since f' is negative for 0 < x < 4, f decreases on (0, 4); and since f' is positive for x > 4, f increases on (4, ∞). At x = 0, f changes from increasing to decreasing, creating a local maximum. At x = 4, f changes from decreasing to increasing, creating a local minimum. Choice A incorrectly reverses these extrema, suggesting a minimum at x = 0. When reading derivative signs, remember: positive derivative means increasing function, negative derivative means decreasing function, and sign changes indicate extrema.
A twice-differentiable function f satisfies f′′(x)>0 for x<0, f′′(x)<0 for x>0, and f′′(0)=0; which could be f′?
Explanation: This question requires understanding how the second derivative affects the first derivative's graph. Since f''(x) represents the derivative of f'(x), when f''(x) > 0 for x < 0, the function f' is increasing on that interval. Similarly, when f''(x) < 0 for x > 0, the function f' is decreasing on that interval. At x = 0, where f''(0) = 0 and f'' changes from positive to negative, f' has a local maximum because it transitions from increasing to decreasing. Choice B might seem plausible if you confuse the roles of f' and f'', but remember that f'' tells us about the monotonicity of f', not f itself. When sketching derivatives, always remember that the second derivative controls whether the first derivative is increasing or decreasing.
The graph of f is increasing and concave down on (0,2), then increasing and concave up on (2,5); which could be f′(x)?
Explanation: This problem connects concavity of f with the behavior of f'. When f is concave down, its derivative f' is decreasing; when f is concave up, f' is increasing. Since f is increasing throughout (0, 5), we know f' must be positive on this entire interval. On (0, 2), f is increasing and concave down, so f' is positive and decreasing. On (2, 5), f is increasing and concave up, so f' is positive and increasing. At x = 2, where concavity changes, f' has a local minimum (switching from decreasing to increasing). Choice C might seem reasonable since it shows f' positive throughout with a maximum at x = 2, but this would make f concave down on (2, 5), contradicting the given information. To sketch f' from f, remember: increasing f means positive f', and concavity determines whether f' is increasing or decreasing.