Compute describing a slow-growth comparison.
Opening subject page...
Loading your content
AP Calculus BC Quiz
Practice Lhospitals Rule in AP Calculus BC with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.
Question 1 / 20
0 of 20 answered
Compute x→∞limxlnx describing a slow-growth comparison.
This quiz focuses on Lhospitals Rule, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for AP Calculus BC.
Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.
Compute x→∞limxlnx describing a slow-growth comparison.
Explanation: This problem applies L'Hôpital's Rule to the limit as x approaches infinity of ln(x)/√x. As x goes to infinity, it's ∞/∞, allowing the rule. Derivatives are (1/x)/(1/(2√x)) = 2/√x, which approaches 0. Logarithmic growth is slower than any positive power root. A tempting distractor is ∞, mistakenly thinking ln x grows faster than √x. To recognize indeterminate forms at infinity, assess if both numerator and denominator tend to infinity or zero in a way that creates ambiguity.
Compute x→0limx1+9x−1 for a linearized measurement formula.
Explanation: This problem applies L'Hôpital's Rule to the limit as x approaches 0 of x1+9x−1. It results in 01−1=00, justifying the rule. Derivative is 21+9x9/1, evaluating to 29 at x=0. Rationalizing by multiplying conjugate also yields 29. A tempting distractor is 9, from forgetting the 1/2 in the square root derivative. To identify 0/0 forms, plug in the limit value and ensure it's indeterminate before differentiating.
Evaluate x→0limx3x−sinx appearing in an error estimate for small x.
Explanation: This problem uses L'Hôpital's Rule to find the limit as x approaches 0 of (x - sin x)/x^3. Substituting gives 0/0, an indeterminate form for the rule. First derivatives (1 - cos x)/(3x^2) are 0/0; second (sin x)/(6x) are 0/0; third (cos x)/6 = 1/6 at x=0. This aligns with sin x ≈ x - x^3/6 from Taylor series. A tempting distractor is -1/6, possibly from sign error in series. Recognize persistent indeterminate forms by applying the rule multiple times until resolved.
Evaluate x→0limx3tanx−x for a higher-order small-angle correction.
Explanation: L'Hôpital's Rule evaluates the limit of x3tanx−x as x approaches 0. It's 00, first derivatives sec2x−3x21, still 00. Second: 6x2sec2xtanx, 00. Third: complex but evaluates to 31. Repeated indeterminates justify the process. The distractor 0 might come from premature stopping. Spot indeterminate forms by checking limits of numerator and denominator independently.
Compute x→0limx3sin(2x)−2sinx for a third-order comparison near zero.
Explanation: This limit problem requires L'Hôpital's Rule to evaluate an indeterminate form. As x approaches 0, sin(2x) - 2 sin(x) approaches 0 - 0 = 0 and x^3 approaches 0, yielding 0/0. Derivatives: 2 cos(2x) - 2 cos(x) over 3x^2, still 0/0 (21 - 21=0); again: -4 sin(2x) + 2 sin(x) over 6x, still 0/0; again: -8 cos(2x) + 2 cos(x) over 6 = (-81 + 21)/6 = -6/6 = -1. Repeated application is needed due to persistent indeterminacy. A tempting distractor is 0, from direct substitution without accounting for higher derivatives. To recognize indeterminate forms like 0/0, always plug in the limit value to check if both numerator and denominator approach 0 or infinity.
Find x→0limx3sinx−x, which arises in truncation error analysis.
Explanation: L'Hôpital's Rule is essential for the limit of (sin x - x)/x^3 as x approaches 0. Substitution yields 0/0, leading to derivatives cos x - 1 over 3x^2, still 0/0. A second application gives -sin x / (6x), again 0/0, and a third gives -cos x / 6 = -1/6. The persistent indeterminate form justifies repeated use of the rule. The distractor 0 might arise from stopping after the first differentiation. To spot indeterminate forms, evaluate step-by-step after each rule application.
Evaluate x→0limxtan(2x) for a small-angle approximation in radians.
Explanation: L'Hôpital's Rule helps evaluate the limit of tan(2x)/x as x approaches 0. Substitution gives 0/0, so we differentiate to 2 sec^2(2x) over 1, which is 2 at x=0. The indeterminate form justifies applying the rule to find this finite limit. No additional applications are required here. The distractor 1 might tempt if one forgets the factor of 2 from the chain rule. A strategy for spotting indeterminate forms is to compute numerator and denominator separately at the limit value.
Compute x→0limxe4x−1, an indeterminate form arising in a growth-rate calculation.
Explanation: L'Hôpital's Rule is the key skill for computing the limit of (e4x−1)/x as x approaches 0. Substituting x=0 produces 0/0, an indeterminate form that allows us to apply the rule by differentiating numerator and denominator. The derivative of the numerator is 4e4x and of the denominator is 1, yielding 4e0=4. This direct application resolves the limit without further steps. The distractor e4 might arise from incorrectly exponentiating instead of differentiating properly. Always check for 0/0 or ∞/∞ by plugging in the limit value to confirm if L'Hôpital's Rule applies.
Evaluate x→0lim1+x−1sinx, a ratio comparing two small changes.
Explanation: This limit problem requires L'Hôpital's Rule to evaluate an indeterminate form. As x approaches 0, both the numerator sin(x) and the denominator √(1+x) - 1 approach 0, creating a 0/0 indeterminate form that justifies differentiating the numerator and denominator. The derivative of the numerator is cos(x), and the derivative of the denominator is 1/(2√(1+x)), so the limit becomes lim_{x→0} cos(x) / (1/(2√(1+x))) = 1 / (1/2) = 2. Applying L'Hôpital's Rule resolves the indeterminacy because the derivatives exist and the limit of the ratio exists. A tempting distractor might be 1/2, which could arise from mistakenly rationalizing the denominator without applying L'Hôpital correctly. To recognize indeterminate forms like 0/0, always plug in the limit value to check if both numerator and denominator approach 0 or infinity.
Compute x→0lim1+x−1ln(1+x) for comparing two linearizations.
Explanation: This limit problem requires L'Hôpital's Rule to evaluate an indeterminate form. As x approaches 0, ln(1+x) approaches 0 and √(1+x) - 1 approaches 0, resulting in a 0/0 form that allows us to apply the rule. Differentiating gives 1/(1+x) in the numerator and 1/(2√(1+x)) in the denominator, so the limit is lim_{x→0} [1/(1+x)] / [1/(2√(1+x))] = 1 / (1/2) = 2. The rule is justified here because the original limit is indeterminate, but the derivatives lead to a determinate value. One tempting distractor is 1/2, possibly from inverting the derivative ratio incorrectly. To recognize indeterminate forms like 0/0, always plug in the limit value to check if both numerator and denominator approach 0 or infinity.
Find x→0limx2sin2x for a normalized energy term near zero.
Explanation: This limit problem requires L'Hôpital's Rule to evaluate an indeterminate form, though actually it's not needed here since it's (sin x / x)^2 →1^2=1. As x→0, sin^2 x →0, x^2→0, 0/0, but L'Hôpital: 2 sin x cos x / 2x = sin x cos x / x, still 0/0; again: (cos x cos x + sin x (-sin x)) /1 = cos^2 x - sin^2 x →1. But directly known as 1. The form justifies, but simpler ways exist. A tempting distractor is 0, from substitution. To recognize indeterminate forms like 0/0, always plug in the limit value to check if both numerator and denominator approach 0 or infinity.
Evaluate x→0limx9+x−3 for the instantaneous rate of change of a root function.
Explanation: L'Hôpital's Rule handles the limit of x9+x−3 as x approaches 0. 0/0, derivatives 29+x1/1=61. Form justifies use. Direct. The distractor 31 doubles incorrectly. Identify indeterminate forms through plug-in.
Compute x→∞lim6x2+2x−73x2−5x+1 using an appropriate method.
Explanation: This limit involves L'Hôpital's Rule for the ∞/∞ indeterminate form. As x approaches infinity, both numerator and denominator approach infinity. Applying L'Hôpital's Rule once gives (6x - 5)/(12x + 2), still ∞/∞. Applying again yields 6/12 = 1/2. Alternatively, divide numerator and denominator by x² to get (3 - 5/x + 1/x²)/(6 + 2/x - 7/x²), which approaches 3/6 = 1/2 as x → ∞. The answer 1/3 might tempt those who incorrectly simplify or make arithmetic errors. For rational functions where degrees match, the limit at infinity equals the ratio of leading coefficients.
To compare rates, compute x→∞limlnxx using an appropriate indeterminate-form method.
Explanation: This rate comparison limit requires L'Hôpital's Rule for the indeterminate form ∞/∞. As x → ∞, both x and ln(x) approach infinity, giving ∞/∞. Applying L'Hôpital's Rule: lim[x→∞] 1/(1/x) = lim[x→∞] x = ∞. Students might incorrectly think the limit is 0 by confusing which function grows faster. The key insight is that x grows faster than ln(x), so x/ln(x) → ∞ while ln(x)/x → 0, demonstrating the importance of correctly identifying which function dominates.
As t→0, the average power factor is modeled by tsin(5t). What is the limit?
Explanation: This problem requires the use of L'Hôpital's Rule to evaluate the limit. As t approaches 0, both sin(5t) and t approach 0, creating the indeterminate form 0/0, which allows us to apply L'Hôpital's Rule by differentiating the numerator and denominator. The derivative of the numerator is 5 cos(5t), and the derivative of the denominator is 1, so the limit becomes 5 cos(5t) as t approaches 0. This evaluates to 5 cos(0) = 5 * 1 = 5. A tempting distractor is 1/5, which might result from mistakenly inverting the coefficient in the standard sin(u)/u limit without proper adjustment. To recognize indeterminate forms transferably, always substitute the limiting value into the numerator and denominator separately to check for 0/0 or ∞/∞.
As t→0, a model uses te5t−1; what is the limit?
Explanation: This problem involves applying L'Hôpital's Rule to evaluate the limit as t→0 of te5t−1. As t approaches 0, the numerator e5t−1 approaches 0 and the denominator t approaches 0, creating the indeterminate form 00 that justifies using L'Hôpital's Rule. Differentiating the numerator gives 5e5t and the denominator gives 1, so the limit simplifies to 5e5t evaluated at t=0, which is 5. This result aligns with the derivative of e5t at t=0, providing a conceptual check. A tempting distractor is e5, which might arise from mistakenly evaluating the numerator at t=5 instead of applying the rule properly. To recognize indeterminate forms like 00 or ∞∞ in limits, substitute the limiting value and verify if the expression is undefined.
A damping ratio is modeled by x21−cos(6x); find x→0lim of this expression.
Explanation: This problem applies L'Hôpital's Rule to evaluate the limit as x approaches 0 of x21−cos(6x). Substituting x=0 gives 01−1=00, an indeterminate form that permits the rule. First derivatives are 2x6sin(6x), still 00, so apply again to get 236cos(6x)=18cos(0)=18. Multiple applications are needed due to the persistent indeterminate form. A tempting distractor is 36, which might come from forgetting to divide by 2 after the second differentiation. Recognize indeterminate forms by substituting the limit value and repeatedly checking after each differentiation if needed.
Find x→0limxsin(7x) for a small-angle approximation in a sensor.
Explanation: This problem requires L'Hôpital's Rule to find the limit as x approaches 0 of sin(7x)/x. Substituting x=0 yields sin(0)/0=0/0, an indeterminate form that allows L'Hôpital's Rule to be applied. The derivatives are 7cos(7x) for the numerator and 1 for the denominator, so the limit is 7cos(0)=7. This is equivalent to 7 times the standard limit of sin(u)/u as u approaches 0, where u=7x. A tempting distractor is 1, which ignores the coefficient 7 and treats it as the basic sine limit. Always check for indeterminate forms by plugging in the limit value and seeing if it results in 0/0 or ∞/∞ before proceeding with differentiation.
A rate model uses xe2x as x→∞; evaluate x→∞limxe2x
Explanation: This problem involves L'Hôpital's Rule for the limit as x approaches infinity of xe2x. It presents as ∞/∞, justifying application. Derivative is 12e2x, still ∞/∞, and repeated applications show exponential dominance, yielding ∞. Exponentials grow faster than polynomials. A tempting distractor is 0, from incorrectly assuming the denominator overtakes. Spot indeterminate ∞/∞ forms by evaluating asymptotic behavior and confirming unbounded growth in both parts.
Evaluate x→0limxarctan(3x) for a small-angle inverse tangent model.
Explanation: This limit problem requires L'Hôpital's Rule to evaluate an indeterminate form. As x approaches 0, arctan(3x) approaches 0 and x approaches 0, forming 0/0. Derivatives: 3/(1+(3x)^2) over 1, limit 3/1=3. The indeterminate form justifies the rule's application. A tempting distractor is 1, assuming the coefficient doesn't affect the limit. To recognize indeterminate forms like 0/0, always plug in the limit value to check if both numerator and denominator approach 0 or infinity.