If near , what is ?
Opening subject page...
Loading your content
AP Calculus BC Quiz
Practice Determining Limits Using The Squeeze Theorem in AP Calculus BC with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.
Question 1 / 20
0 of 20 answered
If xsinx≤p(x)≤xsinx+x2 near 0, what is limx→0p(x)?
This quiz focuses on Determining Limits Using The Squeeze Theorem, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for AP Calculus BC.
Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.
If xsinx≤p(x)≤xsinx+x2 near 0, what is limx→0p(x)?
Explanation: This problem utilizes the squeeze theorem to find the limit of p(x) as x approaches 0. The function is bounded below by (sin x)/x and above by (sin x)/x + x² near 0. As x approaches 0, both bounds approach 1. Therefore, by the squeeze theorem, p(x) must also approach 1. A tempting distractor is A, 0, perhaps if one confuses it with lim x² alone. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to identify bounds that both converge to the same value, forcing the sandwiched term to do the same.
If xarctanx≤S(x)≤1 near 0, what is limx→0S(x)?
Explanation: This problem utilizes the squeeze theorem to find the limit of S(x) as x approaches 0. The function is bounded below by xarctanx and above by 1 near 0. As x approaches 0, xarctanx approaches 1 and 1 approaches 1. Therefore, by the squeeze theorem, S(x) must also approach 1. A tempting distractor is A, 0, perhaps if one confuses the limit with that of arctanx itself. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to identify bounds that both converge to the same value, forcing the sandwiched term to do the same.
Suppose x1−x23≤j(x)≤x1+x23 for large x; find limx→∞xj(x).
Explanation: This problem utilizes the squeeze theorem to find the limit of x j(x) as x approaches infinity. The function j(x) is bounded below by 1/x - 3/x² and above by 1/x + 3/x² for large x, so x j(x) is bounded by 1 - 3/x and 1 + 3/x. As x approaches infinity, both 1 - 3/x and 1 + 3/x approach 1. Therefore, by the squeeze theorem, x j(x) must also approach 1. A tempting distractor is C, 3, perhaps if one focuses on the coefficient 3 without multiplying by x. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to identify bounds that both converge to the same value, forcing the sandwiched term to do the same.
Given −10(x+2)3≤H(x)≤10(x+2)3 near x=−2, find limx→−2H(x).
Explanation: This problem requires the squeeze theorem to determine the limit of H(x) as x approaches -2. The function H(x) is bounded below by -(x+2)^3/10 and above by (x+2)^3/10, both approaching 0 as x approaches -2. Since lim_{x→-2} -(x+2)^3/10 = 0 and lim_{x→-2} (x+2)^3/10 = 0, the squeeze theorem implies lim_{x→-2} H(x) = 0. The cubic terms vanish at the point. A tempting distractor is choice E, does not exist, perhaps due to the odd power's sign change. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to check if higher-odd-power bounds still converge to zero.
For x=0, suppose −1+∣x∣∣x∣≤h(x)≤1+∣x∣∣x∣. Find limx→0h(x).
Explanation: This problem applies the squeeze theorem with the bounds -|x|/(1+|x|) ≤ h(x) ≤ |x|/(1+|x|) for x ≠ 0. To find lim(x→0) h(x), we need to evaluate the limits of both bounds as x → 0. As x → 0, we have |x| → 0, so |x|/(1+|x|) → 0/(1+0) = 0. Similarly, -|x|/(1+|x|) → -0/(1+0) = 0. Since both the upper and lower bounds approach 0, the squeeze theorem tells us that lim(x→0) h(x) = 0. Choice A (1/2) might tempt students who incorrectly think the fraction approaches a non-zero value, but careful evaluation shows both numerator and denominator approach definite values with the numerator going to 0. Remember that in squeeze theorem problems, you must verify that both bounds approach the same limit before concluding the squeezed function has that limit.
If cosx≤p(x)≤1 for all x, what is limx→0p(x)?
Explanation: This problem uses the squeeze theorem with the inequality cos x ≤ p(x) ≤ 1 for all x. To find lim(x→0) p(x), we evaluate the limits of both bounds as x → 0. The upper bound is the constant function 1, so its limit is 1. The lower bound cos x has limit cos(0) = 1 as x → 0. Since both bounds approach 1, the squeeze theorem guarantees that lim(x→0) p(x) = 1. Choice C (-1) might attract students who confuse cos(0) with cos(π), but cos(0) = 1 is a fundamental value to memorize. When applying the squeeze theorem, always evaluate the limits of both bounds carefully—here, both bounds converge to the same value 1, forcing p(x) to have limit 1 as well.
Suppose x2sin2x≤Y(x)≤1 for x near 0, find limx→0Y(x).
Explanation: This problem utilizes the squeeze theorem to find the limit of Y(x) as x approaches 0. The function is bounded below by sin²x / x² and above by 1 near 0. As x approaches 0, sin²x / x² approaches 1 and 1 approaches 1. Therefore, by the squeeze theorem, Y(x) must also approach 1. A tempting distractor is A, 0, perhaps if one confuses it with lim sin x / x without squaring. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to identify bounds that both converge to the same value, forcing the sandwiched term to do the same.
If −2∣x−1∣≤z(x)≤2∣x−1∣ near x=1, find limx→1z(x).
Explanation: This problem requires the squeeze theorem to determine the limit of z(x) as x approaches 1. The function z(x) is bounded below by -|x-1|/2 and above by |x-1|/2, both approaching 0 as x approaches 1. Since lim_{x→1} -|x-1|/2 = 0 and lim_{x→1} |x-1|/2 = 0, the squeeze theorem guarantees lim_{x→1} z(x) = 0. The absolute value creates linear convergence to zero. A tempting distractor is choice E, does not exist, maybe due to the absolute value's kink. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to employ absolute value bounds for limits at non-zero points.
Given −7∣x∣3≤g(x)≤7∣x∣3 near 0, find limx→0g(x).
Explanation: This problem utilizes the squeeze theorem to find the limit of g(x) as x approaches 0. The function is bounded below by −7∣x∣3 and above by 7∣x∣3 near 0. As x approaches 0, both bounds approach 0. Therefore, by the squeeze theorem, g(x) must also approach 0. A tempting distractor is A, 71, perhaps if one ignores the ∣x∣3 term. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to identify bounds that both converge to the same value, forcing the sandwiched term to do the same.
Given 2x2≤V(x)≤5x2 near 0, what is limx→0V(x)?
Explanation: This problem utilizes the squeeze theorem to find the limit of V(x) as x approaches 0. The function is bounded below by 2x² and above by 5x² near 0. As x approaches 0, both 2x² and 5x² approach 0. Therefore, by the squeeze theorem, V(x) must also approach 0. A tempting distractor is B, 5, perhaps if one mistakenly takes the coefficient of the upper bound as the limit. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to identify bounds that both converge to the same value, forcing the sandwiched term to do the same.
If x+11−x21≤U(x)≤x+11+x21 for large x, find limx→∞U(x).
Explanation: This problem utilizes the squeeze theorem to find the limit of U(x) as x→∞. The function is bounded below by x+11−x21 and above by x+11+x21 for large x. As x→∞, both bounds approach 0. Therefore, by the squeeze theorem, U(x) must also approach 0. A tempting distractor is A, 1, perhaps if one ignores the added terms and focuses only on x+11. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to identify bounds that both converge to the same value, forcing the sandwiched term to do the same.
Suppose −∣x∣≤T(x)≤∣x∣ near 0; find limx→0T(x).
Explanation: This problem utilizes the squeeze theorem to find the limit of T(x) as x approaches 0. The function is bounded below by -√|x| and above by √|x| near 0. As x approaches 0, both -√|x| and √|x| approach 0. Therefore, by the squeeze theorem, T(x) must also approach 0. A tempting distractor is E, 'Does not exist,' perhaps if one thinks the absolute value causes oscillation, but the bounds converge. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to identify bounds that both converge to the same value, forcing the sandwiched term to do the same.
If −x≤g(x)≤x for x≥0, what is limx→0+g(x)?
Explanation: This problem uses the squeeze theorem to find the right-hand limit of g(x) as x approaches 0 from the positive side. We have -√x ≤ g(x) ≤ √x for x ≥ 0. As x → 0⁺, both bounds approach the same value: -√x → 0 and √x → 0. Since g(x) is squeezed between two functions that both approach 0, the squeeze theorem guarantees that lim(x→0⁺) g(x) = 0. Choice A (DNE) might appeal to students who worry about the square root being undefined at x = 0, but we're taking a limit as x approaches 0, not evaluating at 0. The key insight for squeeze theorem problems is to check whether both bounding functions approach the same limit—if they do, the squeezed function must approach that same value.
If −x2+4∣x∣≤Z(x)≤x2+4∣x∣ near 0, what is limx→0Z(x)?
Explanation: This problem utilizes the squeeze theorem to find the limit of Z(x) as x approaches 0. The function is bounded below by -|x|/(x²+4) and above by |x|/(x²+4) near 0. As x approaches 0, both bounds approach 0. Therefore, by the squeeze theorem, Z(x) must also approach 0. A tempting distractor is A, 1/4, perhaps if one plugs in x=0 incorrectly into the denominator. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to identify bounds that both converge to the same value, forcing the sandwiched term to do the same.
If −x2+1∣x−5∣≤r(x)≤x2+1∣x−5∣ near x=5, what is limx→5r(x)?
Explanation: This problem utilizes the squeeze theorem to find the limit of r(x) as x approaches 5. The function is bounded below by −x2+1∣x−5∣ and above by x2+1∣x−5∣ near x=5. As x approaches 5, both bounds approach 0. Therefore, by the squeeze theorem, r(x) must also approach 0. A tempting distractor is D, 5, perhaps if one focuses on the point x=5 without the limit. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to identify bounds that both converge to the same value, forcing the sandwiched term to do the same.
Given 7−n1≤en≤7+n1, what is limn→∞en?
Explanation: This problem utilizes the squeeze theorem to find the limit of the sequence en as n approaches infinity. The sequence is bounded below by 7−n1 and above by 7+n1. As n approaches infinity, both bounds approach 7. Therefore, by the squeeze theorem, en must also approach 7. A tempting distractor is A, 0, perhaps if one ignores the constant 7. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to identify bounds that both converge to the same value, forcing the sandwiched term to do the same.
Suppose −x1≤e(x)≤x1 for x near ∞; find limx→∞e(x).
Explanation: This problem utilizes the squeeze theorem to find the limit of e(x) as x approaches infinity. The function is bounded below by -1/x and above by 1/x for large positive x. As x approaches infinity, both -1/x and 1/x approach 0. Therefore, by the squeeze theorem, e(x) must also approach 0. A tempting distractor is D, ∞, perhaps if one thinks the 1/x term diverges, but it approaches 0. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to identify bounds that both converge to the same value, forcing the sandwiched term to do the same.
If −x1≤w(x)≤x1 for x near ∞, find limx→∞w(x).
Explanation: This problem requires the squeeze theorem to determine the limit of w(x) as x approaches infinity. The function w(x) is bounded below by -1/√x and above by 1/√x, both approaching 0 as x approaches infinity. Since lim_{x→∞} -1/√x = 0 and lim_{x→∞} 1/√x = 0, the squeeze theorem guarantees lim_{x→∞} w(x) = 0. The square root in the denominator drives the terms to zero. A tempting distractor is choice A, ∞, maybe thinking square roots grow indefinitely. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to use reciprocal roots for limits at infinity converging to zero.
If 0≤k(x)≤1+(x+1)2(x+1)2 near x=−1, what is limx→−1k(x)?
Explanation: This problem utilizes the squeeze theorem to find the limit of k(x) as x approaches -1. The function is bounded below by 0 and above by (x+1)² / (1 + (x+1)²) near x=-1. As x approaches -1, both 0 and the upper bound approach 0. Therefore, by the squeeze theorem, k(x) must also approach 0. A tempting distractor is A, 1, perhaps if one thinks the denominator approaches 1 without the numerator. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to identify bounds that both converge to the same value, forcing the sandwiched term to do the same.
Given 4−n22≤cn≤4+n22 for n≥1, find limn→∞cn.
Explanation: This problem utilizes the squeeze theorem to find the limit of the sequence c_n as n approaches infinity. The sequence is bounded below by 4−n22 and above by 4+n22 for n≥1. As n approaches infinity, both bounds approach 4. Therefore, by the squeeze theorem, c_n must also approach 4. A tempting distractor is A, 2, perhaps if one focuses only on the added term. A transferable squeeze recognition strategy is to identify bounds that both converge to the same value, forcing the sandwiched term to do the same.