Adult Literacy Advanced Quiz: Integrating Information

10 questions · exam conditions

0:00

Integrating InformationQuestion 1 of 10

Internal Review: Flexible Scheduling Trial

For six months, the accounting division allowed employees to begin work anytime between 7:00 and 10:00 a.m., provided that they attended core meetings and worked their full scheduled hours. At the end of the trial, 78 percent of participating employees said the arrangement reduced commuting stress. Unscheduled absences declined by 12 percent compared with the same six-month period in the previous year.

Managers also reported that the division processed invoices 8 percent faster during the trial. However, a software upgrade introduced in the trial's second month automated several steps in invoice review. In addition, the division did not compare its results with a similar division that retained fixed schedules.

The review committee recommends continuing flexible scheduling for another year while separately measuring the effects of the software upgrade and the scheduling policy.

Which conclusion is best supported by the review as a whole?

Flexible scheduling clearly caused both the decline in absences and the faster processing of invoices

The software upgrade caused the decline in absences, while flexible scheduling caused the faster invoice processing

Flexible scheduling showed promising results, but the trial does not isolate its effect on every measured outcome

Employee satisfaction increased, but the available evidence shows no meaningful operational changes during the trial

← Back to quizzes

Adult Literacy Advanced Quiz

Adult Literacy Advanced Quiz: Integrating Information

Practice Integrating Information in Adult Literacy Advanced with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Integrating Information, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Adult Literacy Advanced.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Internal Review: Flexible Scheduling Trial

The review committee recommends continuing flexible scheduling for another year while separately measuring the effects of the software upgrade and the scheduling policy.

Which conclusion is best supported by the review as a whole?

Flexible scheduling clearly caused both the decline in absences and the faster processing of invoices
The software upgrade caused the decline in absences, while flexible scheduling caused the faster invoice processing
Flexible scheduling showed promising results, but the trial does not isolate its effect on every measured outcome (correct answer)
Employee satisfaction increased, but the available evidence shows no meaningful operational changes during the trial

Explanation: When a passage reports multiple outcomes from a trial that had more than one variable change at the same time, your job is to assess what the evidence can and cannot prove. That distinction between "promising results" and "proven cause" is exactly what this question tests. The review shows genuine positive signals: most employees reported less commuting stress, unscheduled absences dropped 12 percent, and invoice processing improved 8 percent. But the passage immediately flags two problems — a software upgrade launched mid-trial, and there was no control group (a comparable division that kept fixed schedules). Because these confounding factors exist, the trial cannot cleanly attribute every outcome to flexible scheduling alone. The review committee's own recommendation — to continue the trial while separately measuring each factor — reflects this uncertainty. That reasoning makes C the best conclusion: flexible scheduling showed promise, but the trial doesn't isolate its effect on every measured outcome. A is too strong. Saying flexible scheduling "clearly caused" both outcomes ignores the software upgrade, which is an obvious alternative explanation for faster invoice processing. The word "clearly" should always raise a red flag when a passage explicitly identifies unresolved variables. B invents a relationship the passage never suggests. Nothing in the review links the software upgrade to the decline in absences — that connection is simply fabricated. D goes too far in the opposite direction. Saying there were "no meaningful operational changes" contradicts the data directly: absences did decline and processing did speed up. The problem is attribution, not whether changes occurred. Your strategy tip: watch for passages that report positive results and name complicating factors. If both are present, the correct conclusion almost always acknowledges both — neither dismissing the results nor overstating what caused them.

Question 2

Understanding Food-Date Labels

A "best if used by" date generally identifies when a manufacturer expects a product to have its best flavor or texture; it is not usually a safety deadline. A "sell by" date helps stores manage inventory and is not an instruction to consumers to discard the food. Infant formula is an important exception: federal regulations require a "use by" date because the formula's nutrient content and quality must remain reliable through that date.

Food safety still depends on storage and condition. Perishable foods left unrefrigerated for extended periods can become unsafe before any printed date. Conversely, some properly stored products may remain usable after a quality-based date, provided they show no signs of spoilage and official storage guidance supports continued use.

The county's waste-reduction campaign advises consumers to understand the type of date shown, store food correctly, and evaluate products according to safety guidance rather than discarding every item solely because a date has passed.

Which statement would be most accurate for the county to include in its waste-reduction campaign?

Any food may be kept after its printed date as long as its appearance and odor remain unchanged
Printed dates concern product quality only, so storage conditions do not affect whether food is safe
Most date labels are not automatic discard deadlines, but storage, spoilage, guidance, and stated exceptions still matter (correct answer)
Consumers should treat "sell by" dates as safety deadlines but may disregard "use by" dates on infant formula

Explanation: When a passage gives you a nuanced topic with multiple conditions and exceptions, watch out for answer choices that oversimplify. The best campaign message here must accurately reflect everything the passage says — not just part of it. The passage makes three connected points: most date labels are about quality, not safety; storage conditions independently affect safety; and infant formula is a stated exception requiring stricter treatment. Choice C captures all of this. It acknowledges that most dates aren't automatic discard deadlines while preserving the importance of storage, signs of spoilage, official guidance, and exceptions like infant formula. That balance makes it both accurate and genuinely useful public messaging. Choice A goes too far by suggesting any food is safe after its date as long as it looks and smells fine. The passage explicitly warns that perishables can become unsafe before a printed date if improperly stored — appearance alone isn't a reliable safety check for every food. Choice B contradicts itself and the passage. It correctly notes dates are quality-based but then claims storage doesn't matter for safety — directly opposite to what the passage states in paragraph two. Choice D reverses the actual guidance. The passage says "sell by" dates are inventory tools for stores, not consumer safety deadlines, and that infant formula's "use by" date is the regulated exception that must be followed — not something to disregard. A useful strategy: when answer choices all reference the same passage content, eliminate any option that ignores a key detail or overgeneralizes. The correct answer on comprehension questions usually reflects the full message of the passage, including its qualifications.

Question 3

Volunteer Notice: Riverside Plant Removal

Volunteers will remove silverleaf vine from the eastern river trail on Saturday. Participants should meet at the visitor center at 8:30 a.m. for identification and tool-safety training. Removal begins at 9:00 a.m. Anyone arriving after the training has started must wait for a crew leader before joining a work group.

Silverleaf vine can regrow from stem fragments. Cut vines must therefore be placed in the marked collection bags, not in ordinary compost piles. Plants with seed pods should be handled only by crew leaders, who will place them in sealed containers.

Light rain will not cancel the event, but lightning will. If lightning is detected before the event, cancellation will be posted on the park website by 7:45 a.m. If it begins after work is underway, crew leaders will direct volunteers to the visitor center.

A volunteer arrives at 8:50 a.m. during light rain and finds a vine bearing seed pods. What should the volunteer do?

Begin cutting the vine immediately, then place the seed pods in an ordinary compost container
Leave because any rain cancels the event and dispose of the vine with household yard waste
Join the nearest group without approval but place the entire vine in a marked collection bag
Wait for a crew leader before joining work and allow a leader to handle the seed-bearing vine (correct answer)

Explanation: Questions like this test your ability to follow multi-condition instructions — notices that have several rules applying at once. Your job is to identify which rules apply to this specific situation and combine them correctly. Here, the volunteer arrives at 8:50 a.m. — after training began at 8:30 — during light rain, and encounters a vine with seed pods. The passage gives clear guidance for each condition: latecomers must wait for a crew leader before joining a group, light rain does not cancel the event, and seed-bearing plants must be handled only by crew leaders. Choice D satisfies all three requirements simultaneously — the volunteer waits for leader approval before joining and lets the leader manage the seed pods. That's the only response consistent with every applicable rule. Choice A fails on multiple counts: the volunteer skips the mandatory crew-leader check-in and places seed pods in compost rather than sealed containers. Choice B contains a false premise — the passage explicitly states light rain does not cancel the event, so leaving is both unnecessary and wrong. The vine disposal method described (household yard waste) also violates the bagging rule. Choice C partially applies one rule correctly (marked collection bags) but ignores two others: the volunteer joins without crew-leader approval and handles seed pods independently, which the passage forbids. A useful strategy for multi-rule passages: before selecting an answer, mentally list every rule that applies to the scenario, then check each answer choice against your full list. Wrong answers on these questions almost always follow one rule while violating another, making them easy to miss if you stop checking after the first match.

Question 4

Energy Retrofit Review

The Franklin Office Center is considering two lighting proposals. BrightLine would replace every fixture at once. Its proposal has the lower installation cost and estimates a 24 percent reduction in electricity use. BrightLine's warranty covers parts for three years but excludes labor.

EcoWorks proposes replacing fixtures floor by floor over six months. Its installation cost is 15 percent higher, and it estimates a 27 percent reduction in electricity use. Its five-year warranty covers both parts and labor. Because one floor could remain vacant during each phase, the building manager expects the gradual installation to cause less disruption to tenants.

The finance director has said that the initial budget can accommodate either proposal, but the final recommendation should emphasize reliable long-term savings and minimal interruption rather than the lowest initial price.

Based on the stated priorities, which recommendation is best supported?

Select BrightLine because its lower installation price best reflects the finance director's definition of long-term value and reliable savings
Select BrightLine because replacing all fixtures at once produces greater projected savings and less disruption to tenants than a phased approach
Select EcoWorks because its higher projected savings, broader warranty coverage, and phased installation align with the stated priorities (correct answer)
Reject both proposals because the difference in installation cost makes a meaningful comparison of projected energy savings unreliable

Explanation: When a question asks you to match a recommendation to stated priorities, your job is to treat those priorities like a checklist — not to impose your own judgment about what "best" means. Here, the finance director explicitly named two criteria: reliable long-term savings and minimal disruption. Hold every answer choice up against those two standards. EcoWorks satisfies both criteria more completely than BrightLine. It projects higher energy savings (27% vs. 24%), offers a five-year warranty covering both parts and labor (compared to BrightLine's three-year, parts-only coverage), and its phased installation keeps disruption low by allowing one floor to remain vacant at a time. That alignment with all three relevant factors — savings, warranty protection, and disruption — makes C the strongest recommendation. Answer A fails immediately because it misrepresents the finance director's position. The director explicitly said the decision should not prioritize the lowest initial price, so framing BrightLine's lower cost as a reflection of "long-term value" directly contradicts the stated guidance. Answer B contains a factual error: BrightLine's all-at-once installation would likely cause more disruption to tenants, not less. The passage specifically says the phased approach reduces disruption. Choosing B requires you to ignore evidence the passage provides. Answer D invents a problem that doesn't exist in the passage. Nothing suggests the cost difference makes the savings projections unreliable — this is a distractor designed to sound analytical but has no support in the text. Strategy tip: On inference and recommendation questions, let the passage define the criteria — never substitute your own assumptions. The "best" answer is the one that addresses all stated priorities, not just one.

Question 5

Excerpt from Facilities Meeting Minutes — May 3

The committee agreed that replacing the building's aging ventilation controls should be the first priority for the summer maintenance period. Roof repairs were ranked second because the recent leaks were confined to an unused stairwell. To avoid disrupting the training conference scheduled for July 15–19, noisy work was to be completed before July 12 or delayed until after the conference.

Facilities Director's Update — June 20

Inspection revealed that water had spread from the stairwell into an electrical closet. The director therefore authorized immediate roof repairs beginning July 8. The ventilation contractor could not begin before July 15, so that project was rescheduled for July 22. The director noted that roof demolition should be finished by July 12, although quieter sealing work may continue during the conference.

How did the June update modify the committee's original plan?

It kept ventilation work first but moved all roof repairs until after the July conference
It canceled the conference so both maintenance projects could proceed at the same time
It preserved the original priority order while allowing noisy ventilation work during the conference
It moved roof repairs ahead of ventilation after the leak became more serious and limited noisy work before the conference (correct answer)

Explanation: When a question asks how a plan was modified, your job is to compare the original version point-by-point with the updated version, tracking what changed and why. Don't just confirm what stayed the same — look for shifts in priority, timing, or reasoning. Here, the committee's original plan ranked ventilation first and roof repairs second, and required all noisy work to finish before July 12. The June update flipped the execution order: the worsening leak (water spreading into an electrical closet) made roof repairs urgent, so they were authorized to begin July 8. Ventilation, unable to start before July 15, was pushed to July 22. Critically, the director still respected the conference noise restriction by targeting roof demolition completion by July 12, even though quieter sealing work could continue during the event. This makes D the correct answer — roof repairs jumped ahead of ventilation due to the escalating damage, and noisy work was still bounded before the conference. Choice A is wrong because the update didn't delay all roof work until after the conference — repairs actually began July 8, well before it. Choice B is entirely fabricated; the conference was never canceled, and the documents show deliberate scheduling around it. Choice C gets the priority reversal exactly backward — ventilation was originally first but ended up second under the new plan, and it was roof work (not ventilation) that was managed around the conference. When comparing two documents, create a quick mental table: original priority, new priority, original timing, new timing. Changes in any column are your answer.

Question 6

Background on the Harbor Warehouse

Built in 1912, the Harbor Warehouse stored imported goods during the city's expansion as a regional shipping center. Its heavy timber frame and unusually broad loading bays remain largely intact. Historians argue that these features provide rare evidence of early twentieth-century waterfront commerce.

The building has been vacant for 18 years. An engineering assessment found that its foundation can be stabilized, but the work would be costly. The assessment also found extensive interior water damage; many nonstructural interior partitions would need replacement.

A developer proposes converting the warehouse into apartments while preserving the timber frame and exterior loading bays. Preservation advocates support reuse in principle but oppose replacing the original loading doors with standard residential windows. Housing officials note that the project would create 46 apartments near public transportation.

Which statement best summarizes the central issue presented across the passage?

The building has no remaining historical value because most of its interior partitions must be replaced
The proposal could provide housing and preserve major features, but its treatment of other historic elements remains disputed (correct answer)
Preservation advocates oppose every form of residential reuse because the foundation cannot be stabilized
Housing officials favor demolition because new construction would retain the original loading doors more effectively

Explanation: When a passage presents multiple perspectives on a single topic, summary questions ask you to identify the central tension — the core conflict or issue that ties everything together. Avoid answers that fixate on one detail or misrepresent what the passage actually says. The passage describes a warehouse with real historical value (intact timber frame, loading bays), a feasible but costly renovation plan, and a specific disagreement: preservation advocates accept residential reuse but object to replacing the original loading doors with standard windows. Meanwhile, housing officials highlight the benefit of 46 new apartments. The proposal offers genuine gains on both fronts — housing and preservation of major features — but a specific historic element remains contested. Answer B captures this precisely: the project balances housing and preservation benefits, yet the treatment of the loading doors is still disputed. Answer A is wrong because it claims the building has "no remaining historical value," which directly contradicts the passage. Historians explicitly praise the timber frame and loading bays as rare evidence of early commerce — one damaged area doesn't erase the whole. Answer C contains two false claims: preservation advocates don't oppose all residential reuse (they support it in principle), and the engineering report says the foundation can be stabilized, not that it cannot. Answer D is a fabrication — housing officials never mention demolition, and the passage never suggests new construction would better preserve the loading doors. A useful strategy: on summary questions, eliminate any answer that contradicts a stated fact or overgeneralizes one character's position. The best summary reflects all major viewpoints, including where they agree and where they differ.

Question 7

County Emergency Notice

Residents in low-lying areas may receive three types of flood messages. A flood watch means conditions are favorable for flooding, so residents should review evacuation routes and prepare essential supplies. A flood warning means flooding is occurring or imminent, and residents should follow any evacuation instructions immediately. An all-clear announces that the immediate danger has passed, although some roads may remain closed.

Messages are distributed through text alerts, local radio, and the county website. Text alerts are intended to provide rapid notice, but cellular service may be interrupted during severe weather. The county therefore advises residents not to rely on a single communication method.

During an evacuation, residents should use officially announced routes rather than navigation applications, which may direct drivers onto flooded or barricaded roads. Residents should not return home until an all-clear has been issued for their specific area.

A resident receives a flood watch by text, later loses cellular service, and hears a radio announcement ordering evacuation of the resident's area. What action is most consistent with the entire notice?

Wait for a text warning because the original message arrived by text and may not have been updated
Evacuate on an officially announced route and wait for an area-specific all-clear before returning (correct answer)
Follow a navigation application to the quickest route and return when the rainfall appears to stop
Prepare supplies but remain home because a radio announcement cannot replace an official text warning

Explanation: Questions like this test your ability to synthesize information across a passage — meaning you can't just find one sentence that "matches" an answer. You need to apply several rules from the notice together. The passage establishes a clear chain of logic: a flood warning (or evacuation order) means you act immediately; you use officially announced routes, not navigation apps; and you don't return home until an all-clear is issued for your specific area. The resident's situation triggers all three rules at once. The radio evacuation order carries full authority — the notice explicitly says messages come through multiple channels precisely because any single channel, like cellular service, can fail. Acting on the radio announcement is exactly what the county intends. That makes B correct: evacuate on an official route, then wait for an area-specific all-clear. A is wrong because it invents a hierarchy that doesn't exist in the passage — the notice never says text alerts outrank radio announcements. Waiting for a text when service is down ignores the county's own warning about not relying on one method. C violates two explicit rules simultaneously: the passage warns against navigation apps because they may route you onto flooded roads, and it says not to return until an official all-clear is issued — not merely when rain appears to stop. D misreads the passage's intent. Preparing supplies is appropriate for a watch, but an evacuation order elevates the situation to a warning, which requires immediate action, not staying home. When a passage gives you a multi-step procedure, treat every rule as active at once — correct answers on these questions usually honor all the rules, while wrong answers quietly break at least one.

Question 8

Proposal: Community Workshop Room

The West Branch Library proposes converting a little-used storage room into a workshop space equipped with sewing machines, basic hand tools, and two desktop computers. A neighborhood survey found strong interest in job-search classes and household-repair demonstrations. Interest in advanced computer programming was lower, although several respondents requested introductory digital-skills instruction.

The renovation grant may be used for equipment and one-time construction costs, but not for permanent staff positions. The library's current employees can supervise the room for six hours each week. A local trade school has offered volunteer instructors on Saturday mornings, while a workforce agency can provide a job-search instructor twice a month.

The branch manager recommends opening with a limited schedule and expanding only after attendance and operating costs have been reviewed.

Which opening plan best reflects the survey findings, funding restrictions, available partnerships, and the branch manager's recommendation?

Open daily with newly hired specialists offering advanced programming and unrestricted access to all equipment
Begin with limited repair, job-search, and basic digital-skills sessions using current staff and partner instructors (correct answer)
Use the grant to employ permanent instructors and focus primarily on the least requested programming classes
Postpone all workshops until the library can afford full-time staff and a seven-day operating schedule

Explanation: When a question asks you to choose a plan that satisfies multiple conditions at once, your job is to use the passage as a checklist. Every detail mentioned — survey results, funding rules, available partners, and the manager's recommendation — must be honored by the correct answer. If even one condition is violated, that option is wrong. Reading the passage carefully, you find four key constraints: the survey favored repair demos, job-search help, and basic digital skills (not advanced programming); the grant cannot fund permanent staff; volunteers from a trade school and a workforce agency are already available; and the manager explicitly recommends starting small and reviewing before expanding. Answer B satisfies every constraint — it launches with repair, job-search, and basic digital-skills sessions, relies on current staff and the two established partner organizations, keeps the schedule limited, and avoids any spending the grant prohibits. A fails on multiple counts: hiring specialists violates the no-permanent-staff funding restriction, "daily" operations exceed the six supervised hours per week, and advanced programming contradicts the survey's priorities. C directly breaks the funding rule by using grant money for permanent instructors, and it focuses on the least-requested programming content — the opposite of what respondents wanted. D ignores the fact that a workable solution already exists; volunteer instructors and current staff make an immediate, limited launch entirely feasible, so indefinite postponement is unsupported. A useful strategy: on questions with multi-part conditions like this one, mentally mark each condition in the passage, then test each answer against your list. Any answer that fails even one condition can be eliminated immediately.

Question 9

Neighborhood Transit Pilot

Beginning September 1, the city will offer discounted monthly bus passes to residents whose household income is below 200 percent of the federal poverty guideline. Applicants must provide proof of city residency and either a recent tax return or documentation of enrollment in an approved assistance program. Because processing may take up to three weeks, the Transit Office recommends applying before August 10.

Temporary-Pass Provision

Applicants who lack current income documents may receive a 30-day temporary pass if a participating social-service agency verifies that they are experiencing a financial emergency. This provision does not waive the residency requirement. A temporary pass cannot be renewed, but its cost will be credited toward a monthly pass if the applicant submits the required income documentation before the temporary pass expires.

Existing Reduced-Fare Riders

Senior and disability passes are administered through a separate program. Riders already receiving either of those passes may continue using them, but they may not combine those discounts with the new pilot discount.

Which applicant could receive a transit discount without first submitting a tax return or proof of enrollment in an assistance program?

A city resident whose financial emergency is verified by a participating agency and who requests a temporary pass (correct answer)
A nonresident whose employer verifies a recent loss of income and who requests a temporary pass
A city resident who already has a senior pass and wants to combine that discount with the pilot discount
A city resident who reports low income independently and plans to provide agency verification after renewing the pass

Explanation: When a policy has multiple pathways, your job is to trace each one carefully and check whether every condition is met — missing even one disqualifying detail will lead you to the wrong answer. The passage describes a Temporary-Pass Provision that creates an exception to the normal income-documentation requirement. Normally, applicants must submit a tax return or proof of enrollment in an assistance program. However, if a participating social-service agency verifies a financial emergency, the applicant may receive a 30-day temporary pass instead. The residency requirement still applies — the provision explicitly says it "does not waive" it — but the income documentation requirement is bypassed. Choice A describes exactly this scenario: a city resident (residency met) whose financial emergency is verified by a participating agency (the special provision triggered), requesting a temporary pass. No tax return or assistance-program documentation is needed. A is correct. Choice B fails because the applicant is a nonresident, and the residency requirement is never waived under any provision. Employer verification also doesn't substitute for agency verification. Choice C describes someone who already has a senior pass — but the passage explicitly states that senior-pass holders cannot combine that discount with the new pilot discount, so this path is closed entirely. Choice D is tricky: the applicant plans to provide agency verification after renewing the pass, but the passage states a temporary pass cannot be renewed. The credit toward a monthly pass only applies if documentation is submitted before the temporary pass expires — not after a renewal that isn't allowed. When reading policy passages, underline every "must," "cannot," and "does not waive" — those absolute terms are exactly where wrong answers hide.

Question 10

Clinic Appointment Options

Patients may schedule routine appointments through the online portal or by telephone. The portal displays available times immediately and allows patients to upload insurance documents in advance. Patients requesting language assistance should indicate their preferred language when scheduling by either method.

Same-day appointments cannot be booked through the portal. Patients seeking same-day care must call before 10:00 a.m.; requests are considered according to medical need rather than the order in which calls are received. Calling before 10:00 a.m. does not guarantee an appointment.

Patients who cannot use the portal because of limited internet access may ask telephone staff to mail registration forms. However, mailed forms are not required before a same-day request can be evaluated.

A patient has no reliable internet access, needs language assistance, and hopes to be seen today. Which course of action follows the clinic's procedures?

Call before 10:00 a.m., request language assistance, and ask to have the same-day medical need evaluated (correct answer)
Wait for mailed registration forms, then call after they are completed to guarantee a same-day appointment
Use the portal at a later date because same-day requests and language assistance are unavailable by telephone
Call before 10:00 a.m. and insist on priority because requests are handled in the order received

Explanation: When a passage lists multiple rules about a process, your job is to match each detail in the question to the exact wording of those rules — not to assume or fill in gaps with common sense. Here, the patient has three needs: no internet access, language assistance, and a same-day appointment. The passage addresses all three. Same-day care requires calling before 10:00 a.m., and language assistance is available by telephone ("by either method"). Crucially, the passage states that mailed registration forms are not required before a same-day request can be evaluated. This means the patient can call, request language assistance, and ask to have their medical need considered — exactly what A describes, making it the correct course of action. B is wrong on two counts: waiting for mailed forms is unnecessary (the passage explicitly says forms aren't required for same-day evaluation), and no appointment is guaranteed by any method — the passage says so directly. C contradicts the passage. Language assistance is available by telephone, and same-day requests must be made by phone. Using the portal later doesn't address a same-day need at all. D misreads the passage. Requests are evaluated by medical need, not by the order calls are received. Insisting on priority based on call order would actually misunderstand the clinic's policy. A useful strategy for these procedural reading questions: when you spot words like "not required," "cannot," or "rather than," underline them mentally — they often directly contradict a wrong answer. The traps in these questions usually involve reversing or ignoring one precise condition in the passage.