Adult Literacy Advanced Quiz: Choosing Verb Tenses
10 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Choosing Verb TensesQuestion 1 of 10

During a review of transportation grants, auditors requested records for a vendor whose invoices had appeared routine. The finance director then discovered that the vendor's repeated charges had begun six months earlier and had continued until the review.

Which verb phrase most clearly conveys the timing and ongoing nature of the vendor's conduct? The director discovered that the vendor   for services it had not provided.

was billing the agency repeatedly
had been billing the agency repeatedly
has been billing the agency repeatedly
billed the agency repeatedly
← Back to quizzes

Adult Literacy Advanced Quiz

Adult Literacy Advanced Quiz: Choosing Verb Tenses

Practice Choosing Verb Tenses in Adult Literacy Advanced with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Choosing Verb Tenses, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Adult Literacy Advanced.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

During a review of transportation grants, auditors requested records for a vendor whose invoices had appeared routine. The finance director then discovered that the vendor's repeated charges had begun six months earlier and had continued until the review.

Which verb phrase most clearly conveys the timing and ongoing nature of the vendor's conduct? The director discovered that the vendor   for services it had not provided.

  1. was billing the agency repeatedly
  2. had been billing the agency repeatedly (correct answer)
  3. has been billing the agency repeatedly
  4. billed the agency repeatedly
Explanation: When a question asks you to choose the best verb phrase for a reported discovery, you need to think about sequence and duration in past time. Ask yourself: Did the action happen at one moment, or did it stretch over a period? And is it anchored in the past or connected to the present? The passage makes two things clear: the vendor's billing started six months before the audit and continued right up until the review — a span of time entirely in the past. The discovery itself is also a past event ("the director discovered"). You need a verb form that captures both the ongoing nature (repeated billing over months) and the fact that this activity is completed and situated in the past, before another past event. That's exactly what the past perfect progressive tense does: had been billing signals an action that was ongoing over a stretch of time and concluded before a reference point in the past. Choice B is correct. Choice A, was billing, uses the past progressive, which describes an action in progress at a single moment in the past — it misses the extended, repeated duration the passage emphasizes. Choice C, has been billing, uses the present perfect progressive, which implies the billing is still connected to or continuing into the present — but the audit ended it, making this tense misleading. Choice D, billed, is simple past, suggesting a single completed action rather than a prolonged pattern of repeated charges. A useful tip: whenever you see a past-tense reporting verb like discovered or realized, check whether the reported action was ongoing before that moment — if so, reach for the past perfect progressive (had been  ing).

Question 2

Before a six-month software trial began, the operations director predicted that processing times would gradually decline. Her prediction concerned the improvement staff would achieve by the trial's final day, as viewed from that earlier point.

Which verb phrase best completes the director's prediction? She predicted that, by the end of the trial, staff   average processing times by at least 20 percent.

  1. would have reduced (correct answer)
  2. will have reduced
  3. had already reduced
  4. would be reducing
Explanation: When a sentence describes a prediction made in the past about something that would be completed by a future deadline, you're dealing with the future perfect in past context — a verb form that expresses "finished before a certain future point, as imagined from an earlier moment." Here, the director made her prediction before the trial began. She was looking forward to the trial's final day and imagining that staff would have fully accomplished a reduction by then. That combination — past perspective + completed future action — calls for would have + past participle, making A ("would have reduced") the correct choice. It captures both the past viewpoint (she predicted) and the completed nature of the achievement (fully reduced, by a deadline). Choice B, "will have reduced," uses future perfect but from a present perspective. "Will" doesn't belong in reported speech after a past-tense verb like "predicted" — it breaks the sequence of tenses rule. Choice C, "had already reduced," is past perfect, which describes something completed before another past event. It removes any forward-looking sense entirely, contradicting the passage's emphasis on a prediction about the future. Choice D, "would be reducing," uses the past conditional progressive, which describes an ongoing process rather than a completed result — but the passage specifies a concrete 20 percent achievement, implying a finished outcome, not a work-in-progress. A useful pattern to remember: whenever you see predicted/expected/hoped followed by a clause with a future deadline, reach for would have + past participle to express completed future action from a past point of view.

Question 3

The board approved a redevelopment contract in May. In August, it rescinded the contract after investigators uncovered a conflict of interest. An editor wants the revised sentence to make unmistakably clear that the consultant's nondisclosure occurred before the May vote.

Which verb phrase should the editor use? The board rescinded the contract after investigators learned that the consultant   a financial relationship with one bidder.

  1. did not disclose
  2. has not disclosed
  3. was not disclosing
  4. had not disclosed (correct answer)
Explanation: When a sentence describes two past events, English grammar requires you to signal which one happened first. The tool for this is the past perfect tense (had + past participle), which explicitly places one action further back in time than another simple past action. Here, the timeline has three points: (1) the consultant hid the financial relationship, (2) the board voted in May, (3) investigators discovered the problem in August. The editor needs the verb to signal that the nondisclosure happened before the May vote — the earliest point on the timeline. That calls for past perfect: had not disclosed. Choice D is correct because "had not disclosed" reaches back behind the simple past verb "learned," making the sequence unmistakable. Choice A, "did not disclose," uses simple past, which puts the nondisclosure at roughly the same time as the investigators' discovery — it blurs the timeline instead of clarifying it. Choice B, "has not disclosed," uses present perfect, which implies the concealment extends into the present; it also clashes grammatically with the past-tense narrative. Choice C, "was not disclosing," uses past progressive, which describes an action in progress at a specific moment — it suggests the consultant was actively in the middle of not disclosing something, which is logically awkward and still fails to anchor the action before the May vote. A useful rule of thumb: whenever a sentence asks you to show that one past event came before another past event, reach for had + past participle. On editing questions, watch for timeline language like "before," "after," or "already" — those are your signals to consider past perfect.

Question 4

A municipal appeals committee will meet throughout September. It cannot issue its final decision until every appeal has received a complete review. The decision is expected in early October.

Which verb phrase best completes the sentence while emphasizing that the reviews must be completed first? Once the committee   all pending appeals, it will publish its final decision.

  1. will have reviewed
  2. has reviewed (correct answer)
  3. had reviewed
  4. was reviewing
Explanation: When a sentence contains a time clause beginning with "once," "when," or "after," pay close attention to the sequence of events — specifically, which action must be completed before the other can begin. That sequencing is exactly what this question tests. Here, the committee must finish reviewing all appeals before it can publish its decision. The word "once" already signals that the reviewing comes first. The best verb to express a completed action in a time clause that leads into a future result is the present perfect — and that's exactly what B, has reviewed, gives you. It describes an action that will be complete by a certain point, perfectly capturing the "first this, then that" relationship the sentence demands. Choice A, will have reviewed, is the future perfect tense. While it technically describes a completed future action, English grammar has a firm rule: you do not use future tense (with "will") inside a time clause introduced by "once," "when," or "after." The main clause handles the future; the time clause uses present tense forms. Choice C, had reviewed, is the past perfect, which describes an action completed before another past action. Since the publishing of the decision is a future event, shifting to the past perfect creates a tense mismatch and implies the story already happened. Choice D, was reviewing, is past progressive, which describes an ongoing past action — the opposite of the completed, prerequisite action the sentence requires. Your takeaway: in conditional and time clauses with "once/when/after + future meaning," always use simple present or present perfect in the clause, and reserve "will" for the main clause.

Question 5

Tomorrow's public hearing will run from 9:00 a.m. until noon. The legal team expects several written submissions to arrive shortly before the hearing and plans to examine them during the session. The examination will not be finished until after noon.

Which verb phrase best completes the sentence? At 10:00 tomorrow morning, while the hearing is underway, the legal team   the late submissions.

  1. will have reviewed
  2. has been reviewing
  3. will be reviewing (correct answer)
  4. would have reviewed
Explanation: When a sentence pins you to a specific moment in the future and describes an action that will be in progress at that moment, you need the future progressive tense (will be + -ing). That's the central concept being tested here. The sentence places you at 10:00 tomorrow morning — a fixed future point — while a longer event (the hearing) is already underway. The legal team began examining submissions before 10:00, and that examination won't finish until after noon. So at 10:00, the reviewing is actively happening. C) will be reviewing captures exactly that: an ongoing action at a specific future time. It's the right answer. Each wrong answer represents a different tense trap. A) will have reviewed uses the future perfect, which signals that an action is completed before a future point — but the passage tells you the examination won't be done until after noon, so it cannot be finished by 10:00. This choice directly contradicts the passage. B) has been reviewing is present perfect progressive, which describes an action that started in the past and continues into now — not tomorrow. Using present tense for a future event is a clear mismatch in time frame. D) would have reviewed is a conditional perfect, used in hypothetical or contrary-to-fact situations ("If they'd had more time, they would have reviewed everything"). Nothing in the sentence is conditional or uncertain. A useful pattern to remember: when you see a sentence with a specific future clock time plus a simultaneous background action, future progressive (will be + -ing) is almost always the correct choice.

Question 6

The regional clinic introduced an online referral portal in 2022. The portal remains in use, and staff members continue to process new referrals through it.

Which verb phrase best completes the sentence? Since the portal was introduced, clinic staff   more than 18,000 referral requests.

  1. processed approximately
  2. had processed approximately
  3. have processed approximately (correct answer)
  4. process approximately
Explanation: When a sentence contains the phrase "since [a past event]," it's signaling that an action began in the past and continues to affect the present. This is the hallmark of the present perfect tense, which is formed with have/has + past participle. The sentence tells you the portal was introduced in 2022 and is still in use today. The 18,000 referrals have accumulated from that past starting point right up to the present moment — exactly what present perfect captures. That makes C) "have processed approximately" the correct choice. It connects the past (2022) to the present in one seamless tense. Here's why the other options fall short. A) "processed approximately" uses simple past, which implies the action is completely finished with no connection to now — but the passage explicitly tells you the portal is still active and referrals are still coming in. B) "had processed approximately" uses past perfect, which describes an action completed before another past event — it looks backward in time, not forward to the present. There's no second past event here to anchor it. D) "process approximately" uses simple present, which describes habits or general truths (e.g., "staff process referrals daily"), but it can't account for the accumulated total of 18,000 that has built up since 2022. A reliable tip: on verb tense questions, scan the sentence for time-signal words. Phrases like since, for the past X years, over the last decade, or so far almost always call for present perfect. Train yourself to spot those triggers first.

Question 7

Technicians began transferring archived files at 6:00 p.m. The server failed at 7:15 p.m., while the transfer was still incomplete. Work resumed the following morning.

Which verb phrase best describes the action in progress when the server failed? At 7:15 p.m., the technicians   the archived files to the replacement system.

  1. had transferred
  2. were transferring (correct answer)
  3. have been transferring
  4. transferred
Explanation: When a question asks you to identify an action that was in progress at a specific moment in the past, you're being tested on your knowledge of the past progressive tense. The key signal is that something interrupted or coincided with an ongoing action — here, the server failure at 7:15 p.m. interrupted a transfer that had already been underway since 6:00 p.m. The past progressive is formed with was/were + the -ing form of the verb. Choice B, were transferring, fits perfectly: it captures an action that was actively unfolding at 7:15 p.m. when the failure occurred. The technicians didn't finish — they were mid-transfer. That ongoing, interrupted quality is exactly what the past progressive expresses. Choice A, had transferred, uses the past perfect, which describes an action completed before another past event. This implies the transfer was already done — the opposite of what the passage tells you. Choice C, have been transferring, is the present perfect progressive, which connects a past action to the present moment. Since the sentence is firmly anchored in the past (7:15 p.m. that evening), a present-tense form doesn't fit the timeline. Choice D, transferred, is simple past, which describes a completed action with no indication of duration or interruption — again, contradicted by the passage's explicit statement that the transfer was "still incomplete." A useful pattern to remember: whenever a sentence describes two past events where one interrupts the other, the interrupted action almost always calls for the past progressive (was/were + -ing), while the interrupting event uses simple past.

Question 8

An internal safety review concluded that a supervisor received a gas-leak warning at 8:10 a.m. but did not respond until 8:25 a.m. The review also concluded that an immediate response could have started the evacuation before employees entered the affected area.

Which verb phrase correctly completes the counterfactual statement? If the supervisor had acted on the warning immediately, the evacuation   before the morning shift entered the building.

  1. would begin safely
  2. would have begun safely (correct answer)
  3. had begun safely
  4. will have begun safely
Explanation: When a sentence describes something that didn't happen in the past and imagines a different outcome, you're dealing with a third conditional (counterfactual) construction. The standard pattern is: if + past perfect in the condition clause, and would have + past participle in the result clause. Spotting this pattern is your key to unlocking this question. The passage tells you the supervisor did not act immediately — so the sentence imagines an alternate past. The condition clause already gives you the signal: "If the supervisor had acted..." That past perfect sets up the requirement for would have + past participle in the result clause. The evacuation would have begun safely is the grammatically correct completion, making B the right answer. Looking at the distractors: A (would begin) uses the simple base form instead of the past participle, which fits present or future conditionals ("If she acts now, the evacuation would begin") — not a past counterfactual. C (had begun) repeats the past perfect structure from the if-clause, but the result clause requires would have, not another past perfect — using had begun alone creates a grammatical mismatch and loses the conditional meaning. D (will have begun) uses the future perfect, which signals something completed before a future point in time — it has no place in a statement about an alternate past. Your study tip: memorize the third conditional as a paired formula — had + past participle / would have + past participle — and check that both halves match. If the if-clause uses past perfect, the result clause must use would have.

Question 9

A licensing ordinance took effect last January. The city is evaluating the ordinance after its first two years, and the next renewal period will open in January of the coming year.

Which verb phrase best completes the sentence? By the time the next renewal period opens, local businesses   under the ordinance for two full years.

  1. will have been operating (correct answer)
  2. have already been operating
  3. had previously been operating
  4. will still be operating
Explanation: When a sentence pairs a future time clause ("by the time X happens") with an action that will be completed before that future moment, you need the future perfect or future perfect progressive tense. Ask yourself: is the action ongoing up until that future point, or simply finished? If it's ongoing over a duration, the future perfect progressive is your tool. Here, the businesses started operating under the ordinance in January of year one. By the time the next renewal period opens — a future event — they will have been continuously operating for two full years. Choice A, will have been operating, captures exactly this: an action in progress over a span of time that concludes at a specified future point. It's the right answer. Choice B, have already been operating, uses the present perfect progressive, which describes something still relevant right now, not at a future point. The phrase "by the time the renewal period opens" signals a future deadline, so present tense fails here. Choice C, had previously been operating, uses the past perfect progressive, which would only make sense if both reference points were already in the past — but the renewal period hasn't opened yet. Choice D, will still be operating, uses simple future progressive, which suggests the action is merely ongoing at that future moment without emphasizing the accumulated two-year duration that the sentence is specifically highlighting. A reliable tip: whenever you see "by the time" paired with a future event, look for a will have (been)  ing construction. "By the time" signals a deadline, and future perfect tenses exist precisely to show completion or duration up to that deadline.

Question 10

In January, a nonprofit organization began updating its emergency-response manual. The work remains unfinished because new state requirements were issued in April, and the team is still revising the final sections.

Which verb phrase best completes the sentence? Since January, the policy team   the manual to incorporate new legal and operational requirements.

  1. revised the manual
  2. had been revising the manual
  3. has revised the manual
  4. has been revising the manual (correct answer)
Explanation: When a sentence includes a time marker like "since January" and describes an action that started in the past and is still happening now, you need a verb tense that captures both duration and ongoing action. That combination points to the present perfect progressive tense, formed with has/have been + [verb]-ing. The correct choice is D, has been revising. The phrase "since January" signals a starting point in the past, and the passage confirms the work is still unfinished. The present perfect progressive ("has been revising") communicates exactly that: the team started revising in January and the revising is still in progress. It also highlights the continuous, effortful nature of the work — they haven't just revised it once; they've been actively working on it. A (revised the manual) uses simple past tense, which implies the action is completely finished. That contradicts the passage, which tells us the work is ongoing. B (had been revising) uses the past perfect progressive, which describes an action that was ongoing up to a certain point in the past — typically before some other past event. There's no such "cutoff" past event here, so this tense is out of place. C (has revised) uses the present perfect, which works for completed actions with a connection to the present. It would suggest the manual is done — but the passage explicitly says sections are still being revised. The action isn't complete, so the progressive form is required. Your strategy tip: whenever you see "since [time]" paired with an action still in progress, the present perfect progressive (has/have been doing) is almost always your answer.