Adult ESL/ELL Intermediate Quiz: Multi Step Spoken Instructions

10 questions · exam conditions

0:00

Multi Step Spoken InstructionsQuestion 1 of 10

A school office assistant leaves the following voicemail for a student: "Hi, this message is for Marco. You need to bring two things to the counselor's office by Friday at noon: your completed registration form and a copy of your most recent report card — not your current one, but the one from last semester. Once you drop those off, the counselor will call you to schedule an appointment. You do not need to wait in the office after dropping off the documents."

Marco brings his current semester's report card and his completed registration form to the counselor's office on Friday morning and waits for the counselor to call him in. Which of the following best describes what Marco did incorrectly?

Marco arrived too late on Friday, since the deadline was Friday at noon and he should have submitted his documents the day before to allow processing time.

Marco brought the wrong report card and stayed in the office unnecessarily, since he should have brought last semester's report card and left after dropping off the documents.

Marco forgot to bring his registration form, which was the most important required document, and he also waited in the wrong location for the counselor's call.

Marco submitted his documents correctly but should not have gone to the counselor's office at all, since the voicemail only asked him to call the office by Friday.

← Back to quizzes

Adult ESL/ELL Intermediate Quiz

Adult ESL/ELL Intermediate Quiz: Multi Step Spoken Instructions

Practice Multi Step Spoken Instructions in Adult ESL/ELL Intermediate with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Multi Step Spoken Instructions, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Adult ESL/ELL Intermediate.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Marco arrived too late on Friday, since the deadline was Friday at noon and he should have submitted his documents the day before to allow processing time.
Marco brought the wrong report card and stayed in the office unnecessarily, since he should have brought last semester's report card and left after dropping off the documents. (correct answer)
Marco forgot to bring his registration form, which was the most important required document, and he also waited in the wrong location for the counselor's call.
Marco submitted his documents correctly but should not have gone to the counselor's office at all, since the voicemail only asked him to call the office by Friday.

Explanation: When reading a voicemail or set of instructions, your job is to track every specific detail — what to bring, when to bring it, and what to do afterward. Missing even one detail means the task was not completed correctly. The voicemail gave Marco three clear instructions: bring last semester's report card (not the current one), bring his completed registration form, and leave after dropping off the documents. Marco got the registration form right, but he brought the wrong report card — his current semester's instead of last semester's — and he stayed in the office waiting, even though the voicemail specifically said he did not need to do that. Answer B correctly identifies both mistakes. Answer A is a trap based on assumptions. The voicemail says "by Friday at noon," and Marco arrived Friday morning, which is within the deadline. Nothing in the message suggests documents need early submission for processing. Answer C is the opposite of what happened — Marco did bring his registration form, which is clearly stated in the question. Saying he forgot it directly contradicts the information given. Answer D misreads the voicemail entirely. Marco was absolutely supposed to go to the counselor's office; he just wasn't supposed to wait there afterward. The voicemail never asked him to call the office. A useful strategy here: when a reading passage contains a list of instructions, mentally check off each one as you read through the question. Ask yourself, "Did the person follow every step — not just some of them?" On this type of exam, partial compliance is still an error, and correct answers often identify multiple mistakes at once.

Question 2

A supervisor gives the following spoken instructions to a new warehouse worker: "At the end of every shift, you need to complete three tasks before you clock out. First, return all equipment to the storage room and lock it. Second, fill out the daily log sheet — make sure you write the time you finished, not the time you started. Third, give the log sheet to the floor manager, not the front desk. If the floor manager is not available, leave the sheet in the red folder on the manager's desk. Do not leave it anywhere else."

At the end of his shift, a worker returns all equipment, fills out the log sheet with the time he started his shift by mistake, and leaves the sheet at the front desk because the manager is away. How many of the instructions did he follow incorrectly?

He followed one instruction incorrectly — he left the log sheet at the front desk instead of the red folder on the manager's desk, but everything else was done properly.
He followed two instructions incorrectly — he wrote the wrong time on the log sheet and left it at the front desk instead of the red folder on the manager's desk. (correct answer)
He followed all three instructions incorrectly — he did not lock the storage room, wrote the wrong time on the log sheet, and left the sheet at the wrong location.
He followed two instructions incorrectly — he wrote the wrong time on the log sheet and returned the equipment without locking the storage room afterward.

Explanation: When you read a question like this, your job is to act like a detective — compare what the worker actually did against each specific instruction in the passage, one by one. The supervisor gave three tasks: (1) return equipment and lock the storage room, (2) fill out the log sheet with the time you finished, and (3) give the sheet to the floor manager — or, if unavailable, leave it in the red folder on the manager's desk. Now trace the worker's actions. He returned the equipment — but the passage says nothing about him forgetting to lock the room, so task one was completed correctly. He filled out the log sheet — but he wrote the start time instead of the finish time, which directly breaks the instruction in task two. Finally, the manager was away, so the correct backup action was the red folder on the manager's desk; instead, he left it at the front desk, which the supervisor explicitly forbade. That means he made two mistakes, confirming that B is correct. Answer A is wrong because it only identifies the front desk error and ignores the wrong time on the log sheet — missing half the problem. Answer C is wrong because it claims the worker forgot to lock the storage room, but the passage never says he failed to do that; you cannot assume an error the passage doesn't mention. Answer D is wrong for the same reason — it invents a locking error and misses the front desk mistake entirely, combining one real error with one imagined one. The key strategy here: only count errors that are directly stated in the passage. Never assume a mistake happened if the text doesn't say so — this is a very common trap on reading comprehension questions.

Question 3

Listen to the workplace safety instructions: "Before you start your shift, you need to do three things. First, sign in at the front desk and get your visitor badge. Then, go to locker room B — not locker room A — and store your personal belongings. After that, report to your supervisor on the second floor for your daily briefing. Do not go to your workstation until you have completed all three steps."

A new employee signed in, got her badge, and then went directly to her workstation on the second floor to find her supervisor. What did she do wrong according to the instructions?

She went to the wrong locker room before storing her belongings and skipped the daily briefing with her supervisor entirely.
She skipped storing her belongings in locker room B and went to her workstation before completing all required steps. (correct answer)
She forgot to sign in at the front desk and therefore was not authorized to enter the building for her shift.
She went to the supervisor's office before getting her badge, which is the first required step in the process.

Explanation: When reading workplace instructions, pay close attention to the sequence of steps and any restrictions (like "do not" statements). These details are often where comprehension questions focus. The instructions outline three required steps in order: (1) sign in and get a badge, (2) store belongings in locker room B, and (3) report to the supervisor on the second floor. The passage also states clearly: "Do not go to your workstation until you have completed all three steps." The employee signed in and got her badge — that's step one. But she then went directly to her workstation, completely skipping step two (storing her belongings in locker room B). Even though she ended up near her supervisor, she went to her workstation, not to the supervisor for a briefing. She failed to complete steps two and three in order, making B the correct answer. A is wrong because the employee never attempted to go to a locker room at all — there's no mention of her choosing the wrong one. Saying she "skipped the briefing entirely" is also misleading, since she went to the second floor, just not correctly. C is incorrect because the passage confirms she did sign in and get her badge — that step was completed. D is a trap that reverses the facts: she got her badge first, which is exactly right, so this answer contradicts the passage. As a study strategy, when a passage gives a list of steps with a warning like "do not proceed until...," underline each step mentally and track which ones the person actually completed. This helps you spot exactly where they went wrong.

Question 4

A supervisor at a call center gives the following spoken instructions to new employees during training: "When a customer calls to report a billing error, follow these steps. First, verify the customer's account by asking for their account number and the last four digits of the phone number on the account — you need both pieces of information, not just one. Second, put the customer on a brief hold while you pull up their account. Do not discuss the billing issue before you have verified the account. Third, once you confirm the error, issue a credit only if the amount is under fifty dollars. If it is fifty dollars or more, transfer the call to a billing supervisor."

An employee verifies a customer's account using only the account number (the customer says she does not remember the last four digits of her phone number). The employee then pulls up the account, confirms a $45 billing error, and issues a credit. What did the employee do wrong?

The employee issued a credit for the wrong amount — billing errors of $45 must be transferred to a supervisor, not resolved with a credit by a regular employee.
The employee discussed the billing issue before putting the customer on hold to pull up the account, which violates the required order of steps.
The employee did not fully verify the customer's account because only the account number was used — both the account number and the last four digits of the phone number are required. (correct answer)
The employee should have asked the customer to call back after locating her phone number, since no action can be taken on an account that has not been fully verified by a supervisor.

Explanation: When workplace instructions include a list of required steps, your job is to track every requirement carefully — not just the big ones. A process question like this is really asking: did the employee follow all the rules, or did they skip one? Look closely at Step 1. The supervisor explicitly says both the account number and the last four digits of the phone number are required — and even adds the warning "not just one." The employee in this scenario used only the account number because the customer couldn't provide the second piece. That means the account was never fully verified, regardless of what happened next. Answer C correctly identifies this violation: the verification step was incomplete before the employee moved forward. Answer A is a trap based on misreading the credit rule. The instruction says to issue a credit if the amount is under $50. Since $45 is under $50, a credit is actually the correct action here — no supervisor transfer was needed. Answer B describes a real rule (don't discuss the billing issue before pulling up the account), but there's no evidence in the scenario that the employee broke this rule. The employee put the customer on hold and pulled up the account before confirming the error, which follows the correct order. Answer D sounds logical but invents a rule that was never stated. The supervisor never said to ask customers to call back or that only a supervisor can act on unverified accounts. Study tip: On process-following questions, read every instruction for absolute requirements — words like "both," "only," and "must" signal conditions that cannot be skipped or substituted.

Question 5

A community center staff member announces: "To register for our free English classes, you need to do the following. Step one: pick up a registration form at the front desk — these are only available Monday through Friday between 9 AM and 4 PM. Step two: complete the form and return it with a photo ID. Step three: attend the placement test, which is held every other Saturday. You cannot sign up for a class until after you complete the placement test. Classes begin the Monday following your placement test."

Fatima picks up a form on Thursday, returns it with her ID the same day, and attends the placement test the following Saturday. If she passes, when is the earliest she can begin attending classes?

The Monday immediately after she submits her registration form and ID, since those are the two required steps before classes begin.
Two Mondays after she submits her form, because registration processing takes one week before a placement test can be scheduled for a new student.
The following Saturday after her placement test, since she must wait one full week before the center processes her results and assigns her to a class.
The Monday that follows the Saturday she takes the placement test, since classes begin the Monday after the placement test is completed. (correct answer)

Explanation: When a passage gives you a numbered list of steps, your job is to follow them in order — and only in order. Don't add steps that aren't there, and don't skip ones that are. The passage lays out three clear requirements: (1) pick up and return the form with a photo ID, (2) attend the placement test, and (3) begin class the Monday following the placement test. Fatima picks up her form Thursday, returns it the same day, and attends the placement test the very next Saturday. The passage explicitly states, "Classes begin the Monday following your placement test." That makes D the correct answer — the Monday right after her Saturday placement test is the earliest she can start. Choice A is tempting because submitting the form and ID are required steps, but the passage never says classes start after step two. It clearly states the placement test must come first, and classes follow that. A misreads the sequence by stopping one step too early. Choice B invents a "one-week processing period" before a placement test can be scheduled — this detail appears nowhere in the passage. Don't add information the passage doesn't give you. Choice C confuses two different events: the Saturday of the placement test and a later Saturday. The passage says classes start the Monday after the placement test, not a week after results are processed. A useful strategy: when a passage gives a step-by-step process, briefly jot down each step as you read. Then match the question to exactly what the final step says — not what sounds reasonable, only what the passage states.

Question 6

A librarian gives the following spoken instructions during a library orientation: "To borrow materials, you must have a valid library card. If your card expired more than 30 days ago, you will need to renew it in person — you cannot renew it online. If it expired within the last 30 days, you can renew it online or in person. Once your card is active, you may check out up to five items at a time. DVDs count as two items each. So if you want to borrow two DVDs, that uses four of your five item slots, leaving room for only one more item."

A library member's card expired 35 days ago. She renews it online and then tries to check out three DVDs and one book. Which of the following correctly identifies all the problems with her checkout attempt?

She has two problems: her card expired more than 30 days ago so she cannot renew online, and three DVDs plus one book totals seven item slots, which exceeds the five-item limit. (correct answer)
She has only one problem: she exceeded the item limit, since three DVDs count as six items and one book counts as one, totaling seven items against a five-item limit.
She has only one problem: she renewed her card online, which is not allowed when a card has been expired for more than 30 days — her item count does not exceed the limit.
She has no problems with her renewal, but checking out three DVDs and one book totals seven item slots, which exceeds the five-item limit by two.

Explanation: When a passage contains multiple rules, your job is to check each rule against every detail of the scenario — missing even one creates a wrong answer. Here, the librarian states two separate policies: (1) if your card expired more than 30 days ago, you must renew in person — online renewal is not allowed; and (2) each DVD counts as two item slots, with a five-slot maximum. The member's card expired 35 days ago, which is more than 30 days, so online renewal is off the table. That's problem one. Then, three DVDs × 2 slots each = 6 slots, plus 1 book = 7 slots total — well above the five-slot limit. That's problem two. Answer A correctly identifies both violations. Answer B fails because it ignores the renewal problem entirely, treating the card as if it were valid. Finding one error doesn't mean you stop checking. Answer C makes the opposite mistake — it catches the renewal issue but then wrongly concludes the item count is fine. Three DVDs alone consume six slots, which already exceeds the limit before the book is even counted. Answer D is the trickiest distractor: it claims there's "no problem" with the renewal, which directly contradicts the passage. If you missed the 35-day detail or confused it with 30 days, you'd fall into this trap. A useful strategy: when a passage lists multiple rules, create a quick mental checklist and test the scenario against every rule — not just the most obvious one. Multi-part violations are a favorite on reading comprehension questions like this.

Question 7

A pharmacy technician gives the following instructions over the phone: "To refill your prescription, you have two options. Option one: call our automated system at least 48 hours before you run out of medication, and your prescription will be ready for pickup the following business day. Option two: bring the empty bottle to the store, and we can fill it while you wait, but only if the prescription was originally filled at our location. If it was filled at a different pharmacy, you will need to have your doctor send us a new prescription before we can help you."

A customer originally filled her prescription at a different pharmacy. She brings her empty bottle to the store on Monday and asks for it to be filled while she waits. The pharmacist says they cannot fill it right away. What is the most accurate reason why, based on the instructions?

The customer should have called the automated system at least 48 hours in advance instead of coming to the store in person with her empty bottle.
The customer brought an empty bottle, which is not an accepted form of refill request at this pharmacy location under any circumstances.
Because the prescription was originally filled at a different pharmacy, the store requires a new prescription from her doctor before they can fill it at this location. (correct answer)
The pharmacy cannot process walk-in refill requests on Mondays, so the customer must return later in the week when same-day service is available.

Explanation: When a passage gives you multiple conditions or rules, your job is to match the customer's specific situation to the correct rule — not just find any rule that sounds related. In this passage, the pharmacy technician explains two options. Option two allows same-day in-store filling only if the prescription was originally filled at that location. The customer in this question originally filled her prescription at a different pharmacy, which triggers a specific condition stated at the end: she would need her doctor to send a new prescription before the store can help her. That is exactly why the pharmacist cannot fill it right away — and that makes C the correct answer. A is a tempting distractor because it sounds logical — calling ahead is mentioned in the passage. However, Option one (the automated system) is a separate pathway, not a requirement for walk-in customers. The passage never says coming in person is wrong. A misapplies one rule to a situation it was never meant to cover. B is simply false. The passage clearly states that bringing an empty bottle is an accepted method — just under specific conditions. This choice uses an absolute phrase ("under any circumstances") that directly contradicts the passage. D introduces information that does not exist anywhere in the passage. No mention of Monday restrictions or limited service days appears. When an answer includes details the passage never provides, it is almost always wrong. A good strategy: on reading comprehension questions, underline conditions and exceptions as you read. Phrases like "only if" and "if it was filled elsewhere" signal important limits that test questions are built around.

Question 8

A hotel front desk employee gives the following instructions to a guest checking in: "Your room is on the fourth floor. Take the elevator — the stairs are for emergencies only. When you get out of the elevator, turn left, and your room will be the third door on the right. Your key card works for the room and also for the fitness center on the second floor, but not for the pool on the third floor. To access the pool, you'll need to stop back here at the front desk and show your ID to get a separate pool wristband."

A guest uses her key card to enter the fitness center without any problems. Later, she tries to use the same key card to enter the pool and it does not work. She is frustrated and says the key card must be broken. What is the most accurate explanation for what happened?

The key card is working correctly — it provides access to the fitness center but not the pool, which requires a separate wristband obtained at the front desk with a photo ID. (correct answer)
The key card is broken and needs to be replaced at the front desk, since it should grant access to all guest amenities including the pool on the third floor.
The key card is working correctly for the pool, but the guest must first visit the fitness center and then the pool in sequence to activate full pool access on the card.
The key card grants pool access only during certain hours, so the guest should return to the pool later in the day when the card's pool access feature is active.

Explanation: When reading a passage that gives specific instructions or rules, your job is to track exactly what each rule says — and resist filling in details that aren't there. The front desk employee clearly states that the key card works for the fitness center and for the room, but not for the pool. To access the pool, the guest must return to the front desk, show a photo ID, and receive a separate wristband. This is spelled out directly in the passage. So when the guest successfully enters the fitness center but cannot enter the pool, the card is doing exactly what it was designed to do. Answer A is correct because it accurately reflects both facts: the card works as intended, and the pool requires a separate process entirely. Answer B is wrong because it assumes the key card should open everything, but the passage explicitly says the pool is an exception. This is the trap the question is designed for — the guest's frustration leads her to blame the card, but frustration isn't evidence of a malfunction. C is a distractor that invents a fictional rule (visiting the fitness center "activates" pool access) that appears nowhere in the passage. Never add information that isn't stated. D similarly invents a time-based restriction that the passage never mentions — don't confuse what could be a rule with what is a rule. A useful strategy: when a question asks you to explain a situation, go back to the passage and find the exact sentence that addresses it. If the passage already answers the question directly, the correct choice will match that text closely — not add to it or contradict it.

Question 9

An instructor gives the following instructions at the beginning of a community college orientation session: "When you walk in, pick up a name tag from the table near the door and write your first name only. Find a seat anywhere in the first three rows. Once everyone is seated, I'll ask you to introduce yourself to the person on your left. If you are in the first seat of a row — meaning no one is to your left — introduce yourself to the person in front of you instead. We will start in about ten minutes."

A student sits down in the leftmost seat of the second row. According to the instructions, who should this student introduce herself to when the time comes?

The person sitting to her left, because all students are instructed to introduce themselves to the person on their left regardless of seat position.
The person sitting to her right, because students in end seats are given the option to choose either neighbor for introductions.
The person sitting in front of her, because she is in the first seat of her row and therefore has no one to her left to introduce herself to. (correct answer)
The person sitting behind her, because she is in the second row and the instruction about front-of-row seats only applies to students in the third row.

Explanation: When instructions include special cases or exceptions, read carefully to find the condition that triggers the exception — then check whether the details in the question match that condition. The instructor gives a general rule: introduce yourself to the person on your left. But then she adds an exception: if you are in the first seat of a row (meaning no one is to your left), introduce yourself to the person in front of you instead. The student in this question sits in the leftmost seat of the second row — that is exactly the "first seat of a row" the instructor describes. Since no one is sitting to her left, the exception applies, and she should introduce herself to the person in front of her. That makes C correct. Choice A fails because it ignores the exception entirely. The instruction does not say "all students regardless of seat position" — it specifically carves out an exception for end-of-row seats. Choice B invents an option that never appears in the passage. The instructor never mentions choosing a neighbor to the right; this is a trap for students who assume there must be a flexible alternative. Choice D misreads the exception by adding a condition — "only the third row" — that the instructor never states. The rule about front-of-row seats applies to any row, including the second row. A useful strategy: when a passage gives a general rule followed by an "if" or "except" clause, underline that exception. Test questions frequently place characters in exactly that special situation to see whether you tracked the detail carefully.

Question 10

A nurse gives the following discharge instructions to a patient: "Take the white pill twice a day — once in the morning with food, and once at night. The blue pill is only once a day, and you must take it at least two hours after eating. Do not take both pills at the same time. If you miss a dose of the white pill, take it as soon as you remember, but if it is almost time for your next dose, skip the missed one. Do not double up."

It is 8:00 PM and a patient just finished eating dinner. She realizes she forgot to take her morning dose of the white pill. Her next scheduled dose of the white pill is at 9:00 PM. What should she do according to the instructions?

Take the missed morning dose right away at 8:00 PM, since there is still one hour before her next scheduled dose and that is enough time.
Skip both tonight's dose and the missed morning dose, and resume with the white pill tomorrow morning to avoid taking any extra medication.
Take both the missed morning dose and the evening dose together now to make sure she gets the full daily amount of the white pill.
Skip the missed morning dose and take only her regular evening dose at 9:00 PM, since her next dose is almost due and she should not double up. (correct answer)

Explanation: When medical instructions include a conditional rule like "if it's almost time for your next dose, skip the missed one," you need to apply that rule precisely using the specific times given — don't just estimate. Here, the patient forgot her morning white pill. The instructions say: if a dose is missed, take it as soon as you remember — unless your next dose is almost due, in which case skip the missed one and do not double up. Her next scheduled evening dose is at 9:00 PM, just one hour away. That qualifies as "almost time," so the rule kicks in: skip the missed morning dose and simply take the regular 9:00 PM dose as planned. That makes D the correct answer. A is a trap because it treats one hour as "enough time" to justify taking an extra dose, but the instructions don't define a specific window — they say "almost time," and one hour before the next dose reasonably fits that description. The instruction exists precisely to prevent doubling up in situations like this. B goes too far in the other direction. Skipping tonight's regular dose is not instructed anywhere. The patient should still take her scheduled evening dose — she's only told to skip the missed morning dose. C directly violates the clearest rule in the passage: "Do not double up." Taking both doses together is exactly what the nurse warned against. A useful strategy: when instructions contain an "if/then" rule, treat it like a checklist. Identify the condition first ("is my next dose almost due?"), then apply the correct action. Don't let emotion — like worrying about missing medication — override the explicit instructions.