Adult ESL/ELL Intermediate Quiz: Describing Job Duties And Changes
10 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Describing Job Duties And ChangesQuestion 1 of 10

Marcus works as a warehouse supervisor. He is talking to his new coworker, Yolanda, about the job. He says: "Normally, I oversee the morning receiving team and check inventory reports by 10 a.m. But starting next week, my manager wants me to also run the afternoon shipping crew because our lead supervisor is on medical leave. I'll have to push my inventory checks to after lunch."

Which sentence BEST describes how Marcus's job duties are changing, using connected, accurate language?

Marcus used to supervise only the morning team and finish inventory by 10 a.m., but he will soon take on the afternoon shipping crew as well and move his inventory checks to later in the day.
Marcus is replacing his morning duties entirely with afternoon duties because his manager decided to change his permanent schedule starting next week.
Marcus will stop checking inventory reports so that he has enough time to supervise both the morning and afternoon teams without any schedule conflicts.
Marcus's manager assigned him fewer responsibilities next week because the lead supervisor went on medical leave and the afternoon crew no longer needs oversight.
← Back to quizzes

Adult ESL/ELL Intermediate Quiz

Adult ESL/ELL Intermediate Quiz: Describing Job Duties And Changes

Practice Describing Job Duties And Changes in Adult ESL/ELL Intermediate with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Describing Job Duties And Changes, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Adult ESL/ELL Intermediate.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Marcus works as a warehouse supervisor. He is talking to his new coworker, Yolanda, about the job. He says: "Normally, I oversee the morning receiving team and check inventory reports by 10 a.m. But starting next week, my manager wants me to also run the afternoon shipping crew because our lead supervisor is on medical leave. I'll have to push my inventory checks to after lunch."

Which sentence BEST describes how Marcus's job duties are changing, using connected, accurate language?

  1. Marcus used to supervise only the morning team and finish inventory by 10 a.m., but he will soon take on the afternoon shipping crew as well and move his inventory checks to later in the day. (correct answer)
  2. Marcus is replacing his morning duties entirely with afternoon duties because his manager decided to change his permanent schedule starting next week.
  3. Marcus will stop checking inventory reports so that he has enough time to supervise both the morning and afternoon teams without any schedule conflicts.
  4. Marcus's manager assigned him fewer responsibilities next week because the lead supervisor went on medical leave and the afternoon crew no longer needs oversight.
Explanation: When a reading question asks you to describe how someone's situation is changing, you need to track what was true before, what is staying the same, and what is being added or removed. Read carefully for signal words like "normally," "but," and "starting next week" — these mark the shift between old and new. Answer A is correct because it accurately captures all three key details from the passage: Marcus previously supervised only the morning team and completed inventory checks by 10 a.m., he is adding — not replacing — the afternoon shipping crew, and he is moving (not eliminating) his inventory checks to later in the day. The language is connected and precise, using "but" to show contrast between past and future duties. Answer B is wrong because Marcus is not replacing his morning duties — he is keeping them and taking on additional responsibilities. The passage also says this change is temporary (the lead supervisor is on medical leave), not a permanent schedule change. Answer C is wrong because Marcus never says he will stop checking inventory reports. He explicitly says he will push those checks to after lunch, meaning the task continues — just at a different time. Answer D is wrong in the opposite direction from B. It claims Marcus received fewer responsibilities, but the passage clearly shows he is taking on more work by adding the afternoon crew. Strategy tip: On questions about job or schedule changes, create a quick mental checklist — What's staying? What's added? What's removed? What's shifted? The correct answer must match all details, not just some.

Question 2

A warehouse worker named Diego is explaining his job to a job-shadowing student. He says: "I usually stock shelves from 6 to 9 a.m. and then pull orders until my shift ends at 2 p.m. This week only, I'm training a new hire, so I'm doing less order-pulling and spending more time walking the floor with him." Which sentence MOST accurately describes Diego's CURRENT week using appropriate language about job duties and temporary changes?

  1. Diego's permanent job duties changed this week because he was promoted to trainer, so he no longer pulls orders or stocks shelves during his regular shift hours.
  2. Diego is temporarily spending more time on training and doing less order-pulling this week, while his shelf-stocking routine in the early morning remains part of his schedule. (correct answer)
  3. Diego changed his schedule this week because the warehouse manager decided to permanently reassign all order-pulling tasks to the new hire starting immediately.
  4. Diego is doing the same amount of order-pulling and shelf-stocking this week, but he added a full extra shift in the afternoon to accommodate the new hire's training needs.
Explanation: When reading workplace scenarios like this one, your job is to match what the text actually says with the answer that represents it accurately — paying close attention to words like "permanent," "temporary," "same," and "added." Diego tells us two things clearly: his regular routine includes shelf-stocking from 6–9 a.m. and order-pulling until 2 p.m., and this week only, he's training a new hire, which means less order-pulling and more floor-walking. Answer B captures this perfectly — it uses the word "temporarily," correctly notes the reduced order-pulling, and acknowledges that the early morning shelf-stocking is still part of his schedule. Nothing in the passage suggests that part of his routine changed. Answer A is wrong because Diego was never described as being promoted. The training is a one-week assignment, not a permanent role change. Using the word "permanent" here directly contradicts "this week only." Answer C makes a similar mistake — it invents a warehouse manager's decision and calls the reassignment permanent, neither of which Diego mentions. Don't let answers introduce new details that the passage never provides. Answer D is wrong because Diego explicitly says he's doing less order-pulling, not the same amount. It also invents an extra afternoon shift, which Diego never mentions. A useful strategy: when a passage contains time-limiting phrases like "this week only" or "for now," the correct answer almost always uses language like "temporarily" or "for the time being." Any answer that says "permanently" or contradicts those time markers is likely a trap — eliminate it quickly.

Question 3

Leon works as a hotel housekeeper. His normal schedule is: clean rooms on floors 3–5 from 8 a.m. to noon, then restock supply carts from noon to 1 p.m., then help with laundry until 4 p.m. His supervisor leaves him this note: "Leon — Big conference group checking in today. Skip laundry today. Floors 3–7 all need to be cleaned before 2 p.m. The supply cart restock still needs to happen at noon as usual. Thanks."

Based on the supervisor's note, which statement MOST accurately describes Leon's schedule change for today only?

  1. Leon will clean only floors 6 and 7 today instead of floors 3–5, since those are the new floors added by the supervisor's note for the conference group arrival.
  2. Leon will skip both laundry and the supply cart restock today so he has enough time to clean the additional floors before the 2 p.m. deadline set by his supervisor.
  3. Leon's entire schedule is the same as usual today because cleaning floors is already his main duty, and adding two more floors does not represent a meaningful change to his workload.
  4. Leon will clean more floors than usual and skip laundry today, but he will still restock supply carts at noon, making his morning and early afternoon busier than normal. (correct answer)
Explanation: When reading a workplace note or memo, your job is to compare what was scheduled against what the supervisor is changing — and notice which parts stay the same. Don't just react to what sounds new; track each task individually. The supervisor's note makes three things clear: (1) Leon must clean floors 3–7 — that's two extra floors beyond his usual 3–5. (2) The supply cart restock at noon stays exactly as scheduled. (3) Laundry is canceled for today only. Putting those together, Leon has a heavier morning cleaning load, keeps his noon restock, and loses his afternoon laundry shift. That matches answer D perfectly — more floors, no laundry, but the restock remains. Answer A is a misreading trap. The note doesn't say replace floors 3–5 with floors 6–7; it says clean all of floors 3–7. Leon still cleans his original floors plus the new ones. Answer B correctly identifies that laundry is skipped, but it wrongly claims the supply cart restock is also canceled — the note explicitly says "the supply cart restock still needs to happen at noon as usual." That word still is your signal. Answer C ignores the note almost entirely. Adding two floors under a tighter deadline (2 p.m. instead of 4 p.m.) is absolutely a meaningful change, so claiming the schedule is the same shows a failure to read carefully. A useful strategy: when a passage lists multiple tasks, mentally check each one — changed, unchanged, or removed? Supervisors often keep some routines intact while shifting others, and exam questions are designed to see whether you noticed the difference.

Question 4

Fatima is a school cafeteria worker. She normally works the serving line Monday through Friday from 10:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Her email to a substitute reads: "Hi — I'll be out Thursday and Friday this week for a family emergency. On those days, my duties include setting up the hot food station by 10:15, serving the main entrée on the line, and doing a full wipe-down of all counters after service ends. On Fridays specifically, I also restock the condiment area before leaving. Please make sure that does not get missed."

The substitute reads the email and wants to confirm her Friday responsibilities. Which sentence MOST accurately and completely summarizes what the substitute must do on Friday?

  1. On Friday, the substitute needs to serve the main entrée and wipe down the counters, but she does not need to set up the hot food station because Fatima handles that before leaving on Thursday.
  2. On Friday, the substitute only needs to restock the condiment area because that is the one duty Fatima specifically highlighted as important and easy to forget in her email.
  3. On Friday, the substitute needs to set up the hot food station, serve the main entrée, wipe down the counters after service, and restock the condiment area before leaving, since all of these are Fatima's Friday duties. (correct answer)
  4. On Friday, the substitute needs to set up the hot food station and serve the main entrée, but the condiment restock and counter wipe-down are optional tasks that Fatima does only when she has extra time.
Explanation: When a reading question asks you to summarize someone's responsibilities based on a written message, your job is to account for all the information in the passage — not just the parts that stand out most. Read carefully for both general duties and any day-specific additions. In Fatima's email, she lists three duties that apply to both Thursday and Friday: setting up the hot food station by 10:15, serving the main entrée, and wiping down the counters after service. Then she adds a fourth duty that applies only on Fridays: restocking the condiment area. That means Friday has four total responsibilities. Answer C captures all four accurately and completely, making it the strongest summary of what the substitute must do on Friday. Answer A is wrong because it incorrectly claims that Fatima sets up the hot food station before leaving Thursday, which the email never says. Each workday requires its own setup, so the substitute must handle it on Friday herself. Answer B makes a dangerous mistake: it treats the condiment restock as the only Friday duty just because Fatima emphasized it. Emphasis means "don't forget this one" — not "this is the only one." The other three duties still apply. Answer D is wrong because it labels the counter wipe-down and condiment restock as "optional," but the email gives no indication that any task is optional. Fatima even stresses the condiment restock should "not get missed." A useful strategy: when a passage lists duties and then adds a day-specific task, treat it as addition, not replacement. The full list always carries forward unless the passage explicitly says otherwise.

Question 5

An intermediate ESL student is asked to fill in the blank to complete this sentence about a job duty change: "I   responsible for ordering supplies, but since our office manager retired last month, I have taken over that task as well." Which option correctly completes the sentence AND reflects the intended meaning that ordering supplies was NOT previously the speaker's job?

  1. am not currently
  2. will not be
  3. have not been
  4. was not previously (correct answer)
Explanation: When completing a sentence like this one, you need to focus on two things: verb tense and meaning. The sentence is describing a past situation that has now changed — the speaker didn't used to handle ordering supplies, but now they do. That shift in responsibility is the key to picking the right answer. The word "previously" in option D is doing important work here. "Was not previously responsible" uses simple past tense to describe a condition that existed before a specific change — the office manager's retirement last month. This matches perfectly with the second half of the sentence, which explains that the speaker has since taken over the task. Option D is correct because it places the negative condition clearly in the past and signals that things are different now. Option A ("am not currently") is present tense, which actually contradicts the sentence — it would mean the speaker still isn't responsible, which clashes with "I have taken over that task." Option B ("will not be") is future tense, which makes no logical sense here since the change already happened last month. Option C ("have not been") uses present perfect tense, which describes a condition continuing up to the present — but that would mean the speaker still hasn't been responsible, again contradicting the second half of the sentence. A helpful tip: whenever a sentence describes a completed past change, look for simple past tense in the blank. Words like "since," "after," or "when" in the sentence often signal that you need past tense to describe what was true before the change occurred.

Question 6

A job interviewer asks a candidate: "Can you walk me through your main duties at your last job and describe any major changes to your role while you were there?" The candidate wants to give a well-organized, intermediate-level response. Which answer BEST demonstrates the ability to describe job duties and changes using connected sentences?

  1. I stocked shelves and helped customers every day. After a while, things changed and my duties were different. I started doing other tasks too, and my schedule was not always the same from one week to the next.
  2. At my last job, I primarily stocked shelves and assisted customers on the floor. After six months, my manager expanded my duties to include training new employees and opening the store, so my shifts also moved from afternoons to mornings. (correct answer)
  3. My last job had many duties, and things changed over time. I worked with customers and also trained people at different points. My schedule varied depending on what the store needed on any given day.
  4. I had a job before this one where I did many different things over the years. The role changed as time went on and I had to take on more work. It was a busy environment and I feel I gained a lot of valuable experience.
Explanation: When answering interview questions about job history, strong responses share three qualities: specific details, clear transitions, and organized structure. Think of it as telling a short story with a beginning (your original duties) and a turning point (how the role changed). Answer B does this best. It names exact duties ("stocked shelves," "assisted customers"), uses a time marker ("after six months") to signal change, explains what changed and why ("manager expanded my duties to include training"), and shows the consequence ("shifts moved from afternoons to mornings"). Every sentence connects logically to the next — this is the hallmark of intermediate-level English communication. Answer A has specific duties mentioned, but the follow-up sentences are vague and repetitive ("things changed," "other tasks," "not always the same"). A listener still wouldn't know what changed or how. Answer C is similar — it lists general ideas without concrete details or a clear timeline, making it hard to follow. Answer D is the weakest: it never actually describes any specific duties or changes. Phrases like "many different things" and "more work" are too general to be useful in a real interview, and the response ends with a feeling rather than a fact. A good strategy to remember: in professional English, vague words are red flags. Words like "things," "stuff," "many tasks," and "over time" without explanation signal an unclear answer. Practice replacing them with specific nouns, numbers, and time markers to immediately strengthen any response.

Question 7

An ESL student is practicing describing job duty changes and writes this sentence: "Before, I work in the kitchen, but now I am transfer to the front counter because my manager say we need help there." Which revision BEST improves this sentence so it accurately and naturally describes a job duty change using connected sentences at an intermediate level?

  1. Before I worked in the kitchen, but now I have been transferred to the front counter because my manager said they need more help there. (correct answer)
  2. Before, I was working in the kitchen, but now I am transfer to the front counter because my manager says we need help there still.
  3. Before I work at the kitchen, but now I transferred to the front counter because my manager was said we need help there.
  4. Before, I had worked in the kitchen, but now I will be transferred to the front counter because my manager will say we need help there.
Explanation: When describing a job duty change, you need to match your verb tenses to the timeline: past tense for what happened before, and present perfect passive for a change that connects the past to now. You also want your reason clause to use simple past, since the manager's statement happened at a specific moment in the past. Answer A handles all of this correctly. "Worked" puts the kitchen job in the past, "have been transferred" uses the present perfect passive naturally to show a recent, relevant change, and "said they need more help there" gives a clear, grammatically complete reason. The sentence flows naturally and reads at an appropriate intermediate level. Answer B keeps "am transfer," which is broken passive voice — the correct form requires "am being transferred" or "have been transferred," not just "am transfer." It also adds "still" at the end awkwardly, which changes the meaning and feels unnatural. Answer C mixes tenses incorrectly throughout. "I work at the kitchen" stays in simple present when past is needed, and "my manager was said" is not a valid English construction — "was said" cannot take a human subject as the agent in this context. Answer D introduces future tense ("will be transferred," "will say") where it doesn't belong. The transfer has already happened, so using future tense contradicts the meaning of the sentence entirely. A useful strategy: when you see a sentence describing a change from a past role to a current one, ask yourself three questions — what tense describes the past situation? What form shows a completed change with present relevance? What tense fits the reason? Answer A is the only choice that answers all three correctly.

Question 8

Priya is a medical receptionist. She tells a colleague: "My main duties are scheduling patient appointments and answering phones. On Tuesdays, I also cover the billing desk from 1 to 3 p.m. when the billing clerk is at her weekly training. My supervisor just told me that starting next month, the training moves to Thursdays, so my coverage will shift too."

A coworker asks Priya, "When will you be covering the billing desk after next month?" Which response most accurately and completely reflects Priya's situation?

  1. I will cover the billing desk on Tuesdays from 1 to 3 p.m., the same as always, because my main duties haven't changed at all since I started this job.
  2. I will cover the billing desk on Thursdays from 1 to 3 p.m. starting next month, because the billing clerk's training is moving from Tuesdays to Thursdays. (correct answer)
  3. I will no longer cover the billing desk at all starting next month, because the billing clerk finished her training program and will handle everything herself.
  4. I will cover the billing desk every day from 1 to 3 p.m. starting next month, since my supervisor expanded my duties to include full-time billing support.
Explanation: When reading workplace passages like this one, focus on what changed, why it changed, and what effect that has. Priya's situation involves a chain of cause and effect: the billing clerk's training schedule is moving, which shifts when Priya provides coverage. Your job is to trace that chain accurately. The passage states clearly that the billing clerk's training currently happens on Tuesdays, and Priya covers the billing desk during that time — Tuesdays from 1 to 3 p.m. The supervisor then announces the training is moving to Thursdays starting next month. Since Priya covers the desk because of the training, her coverage simply follows the new training day. That makes B the correct answer: Thursdays from 1 to 3 p.m., starting next month, for exactly the reason stated in the passage. A is wrong because it ignores the change entirely. The passage explicitly says the schedule is shifting — claiming "nothing changed" contradicts the information given. C invents a detail not in the passage. Priya never says the billing clerk completed her training program; the training is only moving to a different day, not ending. D also adds false information — Priya's supervisor changed the day of coverage, not the amount. Nothing in the passage suggests she will now cover billing every day. A useful strategy: whenever a passage describes a change, underline or mentally note the before and after. Wrong answers on these questions often either freeze the situation in the "before" state (like A) or exaggerate the change beyond what was actually said (like C and D).

Question 9

At a team meeting, a shift supervisor named Kwame tells his team: "Starting Monday, we're going to rotate who opens the store each week. This week it's Ana, next week it's Darnell, and the week after is Minh. Opening means arriving at 7 a.m. instead of 8 a.m., unlocking, and doing the morning safety check. On weeks when you're not opening, your shift stays at 8 a.m. as usual."

It is currently Tuesday of Ana's week. A new employee asks Darnell, "What time do you usually start, and is this week different?" Which response MOST accurately describes Darnell's duties and schedule using connected sentences?

  1. I usually start at 7 a.m. because I am always the one who opens the store and does the morning safety check, and this week is no different from any other week for me.
  2. I usually start at 8 a.m., but this week I am opening the store, so I am coming in at 7 a.m. and doing the morning safety check along with my regular duties.
  3. I usually start at 8 a.m., and this week is the same as usual because my opening week does not begin until next Monday, so I am not responsible for the morning safety check yet. (correct answer)
  4. I usually start at 8 a.m., and this week is the same because the rotation means each person opens only once and I already completed my opening week before this one started.
Explanation: When a question gives you a schedule with specific timing, your first job is to map out exactly where "now" falls on that timeline before evaluating any answer. Here, Kwame announced a rotation: Ana opens this week, Darnell opens next week, and Minh opens the week after. It is currently Tuesday of Ana's week, which means Darnell's opening shift has not started yet. That makes C the strongest answer. Darnell correctly states his normal start time is 8 a.m. and confirms this week is the same as usual — because his opening week doesn't begin until next Monday. He also accurately notes he is not yet responsible for the morning safety check. Every detail matches the passage. Answer A is wrong for two reasons: it claims Darnell always opens the store, and it says 7 a.m. is his regular start time. Neither is true — the whole point of a rotation is that responsibilities shift week to week. Answer B is the trickiest distractor. It has the right start times (8 a.m. normally, 7 a.m. for opening week), but it incorrectly places Darnell in his opening week right now. Since it is still Ana's week, Darnell is not opening the store this week. Answer D is wrong because it invents a detail — that Darnell already completed his opening week before this rotation started. The passage gives no information suggesting that. Your strategy: before choosing an answer, create a quick mental timeline using the passage. Questions like this often include a distractor that has correct facts but places them in the wrong time period, just like B does here.

Question 10

Read the following workplace conversation:

Supervisor: "Rosa, I need to update you on some changes. Your top priority this week is finishing the quarterly inventory count by Friday. Your regular customer service calls will still happen, but I need you to treat them as secondary until the count is done."

Rosa: "Got it. So I should focus on inventory first and fit in calls when I can?"

Supervisor: "Exactly. And next week, everything goes back to normal."

If Rosa's coworker asks her, "What are your priorities this week compared to next week?" which answer BEST uses connected sentences to describe the duty shift accurately?

  1. This week, inventory is my top priority and customer calls are secondary, but next week my priorities will return to normal with customer service as my main focus once again. (correct answer)
  2. This week and next week are exactly the same — I am doing inventory and customer calls equally because both are always my top priorities at this company.
  3. This week I stopped doing customer service calls completely so I can focus entirely on inventory, and next week I will stop doing inventory and return to calls only.
  4. My supervisor changed my job permanently this week by making inventory my only duty, so customer service will no longer be part of my regular responsibilities going forward.
Explanation: When a question asks you to compare duties or responsibilities across different time periods, look carefully at the passage for key words like "priority," "secondary," and "return to normal." These signal a temporary shift, not a permanent change — and your answer must reflect that nuance accurately. Answer A is the strongest response because it captures all three key details from the conversation: inventory is the top priority this week, customer calls are secondary (not eliminated), and next week things return to normal. It also uses connecting words like "and" and "but" to link contrasting ideas smoothly, which is exactly what the question asks for with "connected sentences." Answer B is wrong because the supervisor clearly stated that inventory and calls are not equal this week — inventory takes priority. Saying both duties are always equal misreads the passage and ignores the temporary ranking the supervisor established. Answer C is wrong because Rosa is not stopping customer service calls completely. The supervisor said calls "will still happen" — they are just secondary. This answer exaggerates the change and creates a false either/or situation that the passage does not support. Answer D is wrong because the change is temporary, lasting only one week. The supervisor explicitly said "next week, everything goes back to normal," which means inventory is not Rosa's permanent or only duty. Answer D misrepresents a short-term adjustment as a permanent job change. As a study tip, watch for words like "still," "until," "next week," and "return to normal" — these signal temporary shifts. Always check whether a change is permanent or time-limited before choosing your answer.