Adult ESL/ELL Beginner Quiz: Revising Messages For Clarity
10 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Revising Messages For ClarityQuestion 1 of 10

Fatima wrote this message to a classmate: "Yesterday I go to the library but it was close, so I don't find the book I need it."

Which revision corrects the verb tense errors and removes the extra pronoun so the message is clear?

"Yesterday I went to the library, but it was closed, so I don't find the book I need it."
"Yesterday I went to the library, but it was close, so I didn't find the book I needed."
"Yesterday I go to the library, but it was closed, so I didn't find the book I needed."
"Yesterday I went to the library, but it was closed, so I didn't find the book I needed."
← Back to quizzes

Adult ESL/ELL Beginner Quiz

Adult ESL/ELL Beginner Quiz: Revising Messages For Clarity

Practice Revising Messages For Clarity in Adult ESL/ELL Beginner with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Revising Messages For Clarity, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Adult ESL/ELL Beginner.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Fatima wrote this message to a classmate: "Yesterday I go to the library but it was close, so I don't find the book I need it."

Which revision corrects the verb tense errors and removes the extra pronoun so the message is clear?

  1. "Yesterday I went to the library, but it was closed, so I don't find the book I need it."
  2. "Yesterday I went to the library, but it was close, so I didn't find the book I needed."
  3. "Yesterday I go to the library, but it was closed, so I didn't find the book I needed."
  4. "Yesterday I went to the library, but it was closed, so I didn't find the book I needed." (correct answer)
Explanation: When a sentence describes something that happened in the past, all the verbs in that sentence need to match — they should all use past tense. You also need to watch for "extra pronouns," which happen when a pronoun repeats a noun that's already doing its job in the sentence. In Fatima's message, three things need fixing. First, "I go" should be "I went" because the action happened yesterday. Second, "I don't find" should be "I didn't find" — same reason, past tense is required. Third, "the book I need it" contains an extra pronoun: "it" is unnecessary because "the book" is already the object of the verb "needed." The correct sentence is: "Yesterday I went to the library, but it was closed, so I didn't find the book I needed." That's answer D. Looking at the wrong choices, A fixes "I go" → "I went" but leaves "I don't find" in present tense and keeps the extra "it" — so it only partially corrects the sentence. B correctly fixes the verbs and removes "it," but it leaves "it was close" instead of "it was closed" — "close" is a verb, but here you need the adjective "closed" to describe the library's state. C never fixes "I go" at all, leaving the very first verb error untouched, even though the rest improves. A helpful strategy: when you see the word "yesterday" (or any past-time signal), circle every verb in the sentence and ask yourself, "Is this in past tense?" That habit alone will help you catch most verb-tense errors quickly.

Question 2

Lin wrote this note to leave for her roommate: "Please don't eat my foods in the refrigerator. I buyed it for my dinner tonight."

Which revision corrects the noun usage and verb form errors without changing the intended meaning?

  1. "Please don't eat my food in the refrigerator. I buyed it for my dinner tonight."
  2. "Please don't eat my foods in the refrigerator. I bought it for my dinner tonight."
  3. "Please don't eat my food in the refrigerator. I bought it for my dinner tonight." (correct answer)
  4. "Please don't eat my food in the refrigerator. I have bought it for my dinner tonight."
Explanation: When editing a sentence, you need to check each type of error separately — here, you're looking for two things: an incorrect noun form and an irregular verb form. First, the noun: "foods" sounds wrong in this context. In English, food is typically an uncountable noun when referring to food in general or as a whole quantity — you say "my food," not "my foods." Lin is talking about one collection of items she bought for dinner, so the singular uncountable form food is correct. Second, the verb: "buyed" is not a real English word. The verb buy is irregular, meaning it doesn't follow the normal "-ed" rule for past tense. The correct simple past form is bought. This is a very common mistake for learners who apply the regular past tense rule to irregular verbs. Answer C — "Please don't eat my food in the refrigerator. I bought it for my dinner tonight." — fixes both errors correctly, making it the right choice. Answer A fixes only the noun ("food") but keeps the incorrect verb "buyed," so one error remains. Answer B fixes only the verb ("bought") but keeps the incorrect noun "foods," leaving the other error in place. Answer D fixes both errors but changes the verb tense to present perfect ("have bought"), which slightly shifts the meaning and feel of the note — the simple past "bought" is more natural here. A good study habit: keep a list of common irregular verbs like buy/bought, go/went, and eat/ate, and practice them regularly — they appear frequently on this exam.

Question 3

Hana wrote this message to her supervisor: "I finish the report yesterday. Please checking it when you have time."

Hana needs to revise her message so that both sentences use correct verb forms. Which revision is correct?

  1. "I finished the report yesterday. Please checking it when you have time."
  2. "I finished the report yesterday. Please check it when you have time." (correct answer)
  3. "I finish the report yesterday. Please check it when you have time."
  4. "I finished the report yesterday. Please to check it when you have time."
Explanation: When revising a message for correct verb forms, you need to check each sentence separately — look at the time clues and the sentence type to determine what verb form belongs there. The first sentence contains the word "yesterday," which tells you the action happened in the past. That means you need the simple past tense. The verb "finish" must become "finished." The second sentence is a polite request or command, which uses the base form of the verb — called the imperative. For imperatives, you write the verb in its simplest form: "check," not "checking" or "to check." Applying both rules together, the correct revision is B: "I finished the report yesterday. Please check it when you have time." Both verb forms are now correct. Here's why the other choices fall short. A fixes the first sentence ("finished" is correct) but leaves "checking" in the second sentence, which is still wrong — you cannot use an "-ing" form as an imperative command. C fixes the second sentence ("check" is correct) but leaves "finish" in the first sentence unchanged, ignoring the "yesterday" clue that demands past tense. D fixes the first sentence correctly but adds "to" before "check," which creates an incorrect structure — polite requests with "please" use the base verb directly, not an infinitive with "to." A handy tip: whenever you see a time word like "yesterday," "last week," or "ago," that's your signal to use simple past tense. And whenever you see "please" starting a request, the verb that follows should be the plain base form.

Question 4

Reza wrote this message to a neighbor: "My car is park in front of your house since this morning. Sorry for the inconvenience. I will move it in the afternoon."

Which revision of the first sentence most correctly describes the ongoing situation Reza wants to communicate?

  1. "My car is parked in front of your house since this morning."
  2. "My car has been parked in front of your house since this morning." (correct answer)
  3. "My car has been parking in front of your house since this morning."
  4. "My car was parked in front of your house since this morning."
Explanation: When you want to describe an action or state that started in the past and is still continuing right now, English uses the present perfect tense — specifically "has/have been + past participle." This is the key concept being tested here. Reza's car is still parked in front of the neighbor's house at the moment he's writing. The action began "since this morning" and continues into the present. That's exactly the job of the present perfect: to connect the past to now. So B — "My car has been parked in front of your house since this morning" — is correct. "Has been parked" is the present perfect passive, which perfectly captures an ongoing state that started at a specific past moment. A is close, but "is parked since this morning" is incorrect grammar. You cannot combine simple present ("is parked") with a time expression like "since," which requires perfect tense. This is a common error for learners — it feels right because it sounds present, but the structure is wrong. C uses "has been parking," which is present perfect progressive with an active verb. Cars don't park themselves actively over time — parking is not an ongoing action here, it's a state. "Parked" (passive) is the right form. D uses "was parked," which is simple past. This suggests the car is no longer there — it would mean the situation is finished, which is the opposite of what Reza wants to say. Study tip: When you see "since" + a past time, look for present perfect ("has/have been") — those two almost always go together in English.

Question 5

Aisha wrote a note to her landlord: "The sink in my bathroom it is broken since two weeks. Please someone fix it soon."

Which revision most improves the clarity and correctness of Aisha's note?

  1. "The sink in my bathroom has been broken for two weeks. Please have someone fix it soon." (correct answer)
  2. "The sink in my bathroom it is broken for two weeks. Please have someone fix it soon."
  3. "The sink in my bathroom has been broken since two weeks. Please have someone fix it soon."
  4. "The sink in my bathroom has been broken for two weeks. Please someone to fix it soon."
Explanation: When you see a question like this, look for two things at once: grammar errors and word choice errors. Fixing just one problem while leaving another makes the sentence still incorrect. Aisha's original note has three mistakes: (1) the double subject "the sink...it is," (2) the wrong verb tense "is broken" instead of "has been broken" (because the situation started in the past and continues now), and (3) the wrong preposition — we say "broken for two weeks" to describe a length of time, but "broken since Monday" to name a starting point. Choice A fixes all three problems: it removes the extra "it," uses the present perfect tense "has been broken," and uses "for" correctly. It also improves "Please someone fix it" to the natural English request "Please have someone fix it." Choice B keeps the double subject "it is broken," so even though it fixes the preposition to "for," the sentence is still grammatically wrong. Choice C uses the correct tense and removes the double subject, but keeps the wrong preposition "since two weeks" — remember, "since" needs a specific point in time, like "since Monday," not a duration. Choice D fixes the tense and uses "for" correctly, but ends with "Please someone to fix it," which is not natural English phrasing — the correct structure is "have someone fix it." A helpful tip: when editing sentences, check every part of the sentence, not just the most obvious error. On ESL tests, wrong answers are often designed to fix one mistake while hiding another.

Question 6

Carlos sent this text to a coworker: "Can you tell me where is the meeting? I need know the room."

Carlos wants to revise his message so it is grammatically correct and easy to understand. Which version should he send?

  1. "Can you tell me where the meeting is? I need to know the room." (correct answer)
  2. "Can you tell me where is the meeting? I need to know the room."
  3. "Can you tell me where the meeting is? I need know the room number."
  4. "Can you tell me where is the meeting room? I need to know the place."
Explanation: When checking a message for grammar, focus on two common trouble spots: indirect questions and infinitive verbs. These are frequent error types for English learners, and this question tests both at once. In English, when a question is embedded inside a longer sentence (called an indirect question), the word order changes. You do NOT use question word order. Instead of "where is the meeting," you write "where the meeting is" — subject before verb, just like a regular statement. Think of it this way: the sentence already has its question word ("Can you tell me...?"), so the embedded part should calm down and use normal order. The second error in Carlos's original message is "I need know." In English, when two verbs appear together, the second verb usually needs "to" in front of it. So it must be "I need to know." Answer A fixes both problems correctly — "where the meeting is" (proper indirect question order) and "I need to know" (correct infinitive form). That makes A the right choice. Answer B corrects the infinitive ("to know") but keeps the wrong word order ("where is the meeting"), so it's only half-fixed. Answer C fixes the indirect question word order but still includes "I need know," leaving out the essential "to." Answer D changes the meaning of the message and still keeps the incorrect "where is the meeting" structure. A helpful tip: whenever you see "Can you tell me where..." or "Do you know when/why/how...", always follow it with subject + verb order, not question order. That pattern will serve you well on this exam.

Question 7

Yemi wrote this message to a doctor's office: "I want make appointment for next week. What days you have open?"

Yemi wants to revise the message to make both sentences grammatically correct. Which version should she send?

  1. "I would like to make an appointment for next week. What days you have open?"
  2. "I would like make an appointment for next week. What days do you have open?"
  3. "I would like to make an appointment for next week. What days do you have open?" (correct answer)
  4. "I want make an appointment for next week. What days do you have open?"
Explanation: When revising sentences for grammar, it helps to check each sentence separately for two common errors: verb form after modal verbs, and question word order. First, look at "I want make an appointment." In English, modal-like expressions such as would like must be followed by to + base verb. So the correct form is "I would like to make" — you need that "to" between the expression and the verb. This fixes the first sentence. Second, look at "What days you have open?" This is a question, so it needs a helping verb (auxiliary) before the subject. In English, most questions require do/does/did when there's no other auxiliary verb. The correct form is "What days do you have open?" — the auxiliary "do" must come before "you." Only answer C fixes both errors: "I would like to make an appointment for next week. What days do you have open?" That makes C the correct answer. Answer A fixes the first sentence correctly but leaves the second sentence broken — "What days you have open?" still has no auxiliary verb. Answer B keeps the first sentence broken by dropping the "to" — "I would like make" is still incorrect — while fixing the second sentence. Answer D fixes neither error in the first sentence, keeping "I want make" without "to." A useful strategy: when a question asks you to correct both sentences, eliminate any answer that only fixes one. Always check every sentence before choosing — partial corrections are a common trap on grammar revision questions.

Question 8

Paulo wrote this message to his teacher: "I very confuse about the homework. Can you explain me what we must to do?"

Paulo wants to revise his message so that every sentence is grammatically correct. Which revision achieves this?

  1. "I am very confused about the homework. Can you explain to me what we must to do?"
  2. "I am very confused about the homework. Can you explain me what we must do?"
  3. "I very confused about the homework. Can you explain to me what we must do?"
  4. "I am very confused about the homework. Can you explain to me what we must do?" (correct answer)
Explanation: When revising a message for grammar, you need to check every sentence carefully — one error in any sentence means the whole revision fails. This question tests three common grammar rules for English learners: linking verbs with adjectives, the verb phrase "must do," and the phrase "explain to me." First, "I very confuse" is wrong because English requires a linking verb (a form of be) to connect a subject to a describing word. The correct structure is subject + am/is/are + adjective, so "I am very confused" is right. "Confused" is an adjective here, not a verb. Second, "must to do" is incorrect. After modal verbs like must, can, will, and should, you always use the base form of the verb with no to. So it must be "must do," not "must to do." Third, "explain me" is wrong. The verb explain requires the preposition to before an indirect object. You explain something to someone, so the correct form is "explain to me." Answer D fixes all three errors: "I am very confused" (linking verb + adjective), "explain to me" (preposition included), and "must do" (no extra to). That makes D the correct answer. Answer A fixes the first and third sentences correctly but still has "must to do" — one error remains. Answer B fixes the first sentence but drops the necessary to in "explain me." Answer C keeps "I very confused," missing the required linking verb am. A useful tip: when checking grammar revisions, go sentence by sentence and error by error — one uncorrected mistake eliminates that choice entirely.

Question 9

Maria wrote this message to her boss: "I no can come work tomorrow because my son is sick and I need take him doctor."

Which revision makes Maria's message clearest and most correct?

  1. "I cannot come to work tomorrow because my son is sick and I need to take him to the doctor." (correct answer)
  2. "I no can come to work tomorrow because my son is sick and I need to take him to the doctor."
  3. "I cannot come work tomorrow because my son is sick and I need to take him to the doctor."
  4. "I cannot come to work tomorrow because my son sick and I need take him to the doctor."
Explanation: When revising a message for clarity and correctness, focus on two common grammar patterns that English learners often struggle with: forming negatives correctly and using prepositions before nouns. In English, we never say "no can" — instead, we combine "can" with "not" to form "cannot" (or "can't"). This is how negatives work with modal verbs like can, will, and should. We also need the preposition "to" before certain nouns that indicate destinations or purposes: "come to work," "take him to the doctor." These small words are easy to forget, but they are required in standard English sentences. Answer A fixes every error in the original message: "no can" becomes "cannot," and both missing prepositions — "to work" and "to the doctor" — are added. This makes the message completely correct and professional. Answer B keeps the incorrect "no can" phrasing, even though it adds the other missing words. This would still sound wrong to Maria's boss. Answer C correctly uses "cannot" but forgets the preposition after it — "come work" should be "come to work." One fix is not enough; all errors need to be corrected. Answer D correctly uses "cannot" and adds "to work," but then introduces two new errors in the second half: "my son sick" is missing the verb "is," and "need take" is missing "to take." This revision actually makes the message worse in some places. A good study tip: whenever you revise a sentence, check it piece by piece — negatives, verbs, and prepositions each deserve their own pass.

Question 10

Dmitri wrote this email subject line and opening: "Subject: Question about my pay. Dear Mr. Smith, I think my paycheck have a mistake in it and I want you look at it please."

Dmitri wants to revise only the body sentence so it is correct and professional. Which revision is best?

  1. "I think my paycheck has a mistake in it, and I would like you to look at it, please." (correct answer)
  2. "I think my paycheck have a mistake in it, and I would like you to look at it, please."
  3. "I think my paycheck has a mistake in it and I want you look at it please."
  4. "I think my paycheck has a mistake in it, and I would like you look at it, please."
Explanation: When revising a professional email, you need to check for two things: grammar errors (subject-verb agreement, complete verb phrases) and tone (formal vs. casual language). Dmitri's original sentence has both problems — "have" is the wrong verb form, and "want you look" is missing the word "to." The best revision is A. It fixes the subject-verb agreement by changing "have" to "has" — the subject "paycheck" is singular, so it needs the singular verb "has." It also corrects "want you look" to "would like you to look," which includes the necessary word "to" and replaces the casual "want" with the more professional "would like." The commas are also placed correctly before "and" to join two independent clauses. B keeps the original error "have" instead of "has," so the subject-verb agreement is still wrong, even though the tone is improved. C fixes "have" to "has," but it keeps "want you look at it," which is missing "to" — you can't say "want you look"; you need "want you to look." It also lacks the comma before "and," and "want" remains too casual for a professional email. D fixes "have" to "has" and adds the comma, but it still says "would like you look" — missing the word "to" before "look," making it grammatically incomplete. Study tip: In professional writing questions, always check two things separately: grammar correctness first, then tone. A sentence can sound polite but still have a grammar error — you need both to be right.