Adult ESL/ELL Advanced Quiz: Using Passive Voice
10 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Using Passive VoiceQuestion 1 of 10

A student writes the following sentence in a research paper: 'Researchers have long debated whether economic inequality causes higher crime rates.' The student's professor comments that the sentence should use passive voice to foreground the debate itself rather than the researchers, and that the causal claim should be softened to reflect academic hedging. Which revision BEST addresses BOTH of the professor's concerns simultaneously?

The question of whether economic inequality causes higher crime rates has long been debated, with many researchers suggesting a possible causal link.
It has long been debated by researchers whether economic inequality may be a contributing factor to elevated crime rates in certain contexts.
Economic inequality and its possible relationship to higher crime rates have long been debated among researchers in the social sciences.
Whether economic inequality causes higher crime rates has long been debated, and researchers continue to examine this causal relationship in new studies.
← Back to quizzes

Adult ESL/ELL Advanced Quiz

Adult ESL/ELL Advanced Quiz: Using Passive Voice

Practice Using Passive Voice in Adult ESL/ELL Advanced with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Using Passive Voice, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Adult ESL/ELL Advanced.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A student writes the following sentence in a research paper: 'Researchers have long debated whether economic inequality causes higher crime rates.' The student's professor comments that the sentence should use passive voice to foreground the debate itself rather than the researchers, and that the causal claim should be softened to reflect academic hedging. Which revision BEST addresses BOTH of the professor's concerns simultaneously?

  1. The question of whether economic inequality causes higher crime rates has long been debated, with many researchers suggesting a possible causal link. (correct answer)
  2. It has long been debated by researchers whether economic inequality may be a contributing factor to elevated crime rates in certain contexts.
  3. Economic inequality and its possible relationship to higher crime rates have long been debated among researchers in the social sciences.
  4. Whether economic inequality causes higher crime rates has long been debated, and researchers continue to examine this causal relationship in new studies.
Explanation: When revising academic sentences, you need to track multiple simultaneous requirements — here, passive voice construction AND hedging language. Train yourself to check both boxes before choosing an answer. The professor wants two specific things: (1) the debate foregrounded through passive voice, meaning "the debate" should be the grammatical subject rather than "researchers," and (2) softened causal language that reflects academic uncertainty rather than stating a definitive cause-and-effect relationship. Answer A accomplishes both elegantly. The clause "The question of whether economic inequality causes higher crime rates has long been debated" opens with the topic itself as subject — not researchers — while the added phrase "suggesting a possible causal link" introduces hedging that softens the original direct causal claim. Both concerns are fully addressed. Answer B fails the passive voice requirement in a subtle but important way. While it does use "has long been debated," the phrase "by researchers" still makes researchers grammatically prominent, and the added contextual qualifier "in certain contexts" creates unnecessary specificity the professor didn't request. Answer C changes the grammatical subject to "Economic inequality and its possible relationship," which neither foregrounds the debate nor uses proper passive construction around it — and it loses the hedging almost entirely. Answer D keeps the passive structure partially but immediately undermines the hedging requirement by saying "researchers continue to examine this causal relationship," which reinforces rather than softens the causal claim. As a strategy: on questions testing multiple revision criteria simultaneously, eliminate any answer that satisfies only one condition. An answer must address every stated concern — partial credit doesn't exist in revision questions like these.

Question 2

A pharmaceutical company is drafting a report on a new drug trial. The lead researcher writes: 'We administered the drug to 500 participants over six months. We observed significant reductions in blood pressure in 78% of cases. Errors in the dosage protocol compromised the results for the remaining 22%.'

The researcher wants to revise the report to follow academic convention, which typically de-emphasizes the agent and foregrounds the process or outcome. Which revision of the final sentence BEST achieves this goal while preserving the original meaning and maintaining grammatical accuracy?

  1. The results for the remaining 22% were compromised by errors in the dosage protocol, which the research team had failed to standardize across all trial sites.
  2. The results for the remaining 22% were compromised due to errors in the dosage protocol, shifting focus away from those responsible for the oversight.
  3. Errors in the dosage protocol had compromised the results for the remaining 22%, a fact that was later acknowledged in peer review.
  4. The results for the remaining 22% were compromised by errors in the dosage protocol, which were identified during the data-analysis phase. (correct answer)
Explanation: When writing in academic or scientific contexts, you'll often encounter a convention called passive voice, which moves the action or outcome to the front of the sentence and downplays who performed the action. This question tests your ability to recognize a revision that achieves that shift while staying faithful to the original meaning — no additions, no distortions. The original sentence ("Errors in the dosage protocol compromised the results...") uses active voice, foregrounding the agent (errors/researchers). A proper academic revision should convert this to passive voice, making the results the grammatical subject. Choice D does exactly this: "The results for the remaining 22% were compromised by errors in the dosage protocol" is clean passive construction that preserves the original meaning completely. The added clause ("which were identified during the data-analysis phase") is a neutral, factual modifier that doesn't alter or editorialize the core claim. Choice A fails because it adds new information — that the research team "failed to standardize across all trial sites" — which goes beyond the original sentence and introduces an unverified claim. Choice B is problematic because the phrase "shifting focus away from those responsible for the oversight" is meta-commentary about the revision itself, not part of the report; it also implies blame in a way the original does not. Choice C keeps the sentence in active voice ("had compromised") and adds a claim about peer review that doesn't exist in the original — both violations of the task. Study tip: On academic writing questions, watch for answer choices that add editorial commentary or new facts — these almost always disqualify an otherwise grammatical option.

Question 3

Advanced academic writers must recognize when passive voice is inappropriate despite surface-level grammatical correctness. Which of the following sentences contains a passive construction that is grammatically correct but contextually inappropriate for formal academic writing, and why?

  1. 'The hypothesis was tested using a double-blind randomized controlled trial, and the results were analyzed with ANOVA'—inappropriate because passive voice obscures the methodology and makes replication difficult for other researchers.
  2. 'Mistakes were made in the allocation of research funds, and the oversight has since been corrected by the committee'—inappropriate because the agentless passive in the first clause evades accountability in a context where institutional transparency is expected. (correct answer)
  3. 'The data were collected over a 12-month period, and each variable was operationalized according to the definitions provided in the literature'—inappropriate because passive voice in methods sections is considered non-standard in most scientific disciplines.
  4. 'A correlation was found between sleep deprivation and reduced cognitive performance, suggesting that further investigation is warranted'—inappropriate because passive voice misrepresents the direction of causality and weakens the argument's logical structure.
Explanation: When evaluating passive voice in academic writing, the key distinction isn't grammatical correctness — it's whether the passive construction serves clarity and accountability, or deliberately obscures them. Ask yourself: who is the agent, and does hiding them distort meaning or evade responsibility? Answer B is the problematic construction. "Mistakes were made in the allocation of research funds" is agentless — no one is identified as responsible. In an institutional or academic accountability context, this is not a stylistic choice; it's an ethical one. Formal academic and institutional writing demands transparency about who acted and who bears responsibility. The agentless passive here mimics the kind of evasive language associated with political spin, not scholarly integrity. That's what makes it contextually inappropriate despite being grammatically flawless. Answer A is actually a textbook example of appropriate passive voice. Methods sections routinely use passive constructions to foreground what was done rather than who did it — this is disciplinary convention, not a flaw. Answer C follows the same logic; passive voice in methods sections is not only acceptable but standard across most scientific disciplines, so calling it "non-standard" is factually wrong. Answer D misidentifies the problem entirely — passive voice does not inherently misrepresent causality. The sentence correctly uses hedged language ("suggesting") and makes no causal claim, so the critique doesn't hold. A useful strategy: whenever you see a question about passive voice appropriateness, distinguish between descriptive passives (methods, findings) and accountability passives (who did something wrong or significant). The former are usually acceptable; the latter demand an agent.

Question 4

An HR coordinator is writing an email to all staff regarding a new onboarding policy. A draft reads: 'Management has decided that new hires will complete a mandatory orientation session during their first week. HR will schedule these sessions monthly. The department head must approve any exceptions to this schedule in advance.'

The coordinator is advised to rewrite the email using passive voice throughout to convey institutional authority rather than individual decision-making. Which version of the ENTIRE passage BEST applies passive voice appropriately and consistently across all three sentences?

  1. It has been decided that new hires will complete a mandatory orientation session during their first week. These sessions will be scheduled monthly by HR. Any exceptions to this schedule must be approved in advance by the department head.
  2. A decision has been made that a mandatory orientation session is to be completed by new hires during their first week. Monthly scheduling of these sessions will be handled by HR. Exceptions to this schedule are required to receive prior approval.
  3. It has been decided that a mandatory orientation session must be completed by new hires during their first week. These sessions are scheduled on a monthly basis. Any exceptions to this schedule must be approved in advance by the department head. (correct answer)
  4. Management's decision requires new hires to complete a mandatory orientation session in their first week. Monthly sessions will be scheduled by HR, and any exceptions to this schedule must be approved in advance by the department head.
Explanation: When a question asks you to apply passive voice "consistently," you need to check every single sentence — not just the first one. Passive voice shifts focus away from the actor (the subject doing something) and onto the action or the recipient. The formula is: be verb + past participle (e.g., "has been decided," "must be completed," "are scheduled"). In professional writing, this construction signals institutional policy rather than individual authority. Answer C is the strongest choice because all three sentences genuinely use passive constructions. "It has been decided" removes the named actor (Management). "A mandatory orientation session must be completed by new hires" places the action first. "These sessions are scheduled on a monthly basis" and "must be approved in advance by the department head" both follow the passive pattern throughout — creating a consistent, policy-document tone with no sentence anchored to a named decision-maker. Answer A is close but imperfect. The first sentence uses passive correctly, but "new hires will complete" in the original draft structure still implies active agency. More importantly, A's passive application is slightly less thorough and consistent than C's across all three sentences when examined carefully. Answer B overcorrects into awkward, unnatural phrasing. "Exceptions to this schedule are required to receive prior approval" is grammatically clumsy and doesn't clearly use standard passive voice — it obscures meaning rather than clarifying it. Answer D fails immediately: "Management's decision requires new hires to complete" keeps Management as the named subject, which directly contradicts the goal of removing individual decision-makers. Tip: When checking for consistent passive voice, underline the verb in each sentence separately. If any sentence still names an actor as the grammatical subject performing an action, it hasn't been fully converted.

Question 5

In formal academic and workplace writing, passive voice is sometimes criticized as ambiguous because it can omit the agent entirely. However, skilled writers use agentless passive strategically. Which of the following sentences represents the MOST appropriate and purposeful use of agentless passive in a professional context?

  1. The quarterly budget was approved, and it will be implemented across all departments starting in the next fiscal cycle.
  2. The quarterly budget was approved by the CFO, and the finance committee will implement it across all departments next cycle.
  3. The quarterly budget has been approved, and the relevant managers have been notified about the implementation timeline. (correct answer)
  4. The quarterly budget is being approved, and departments should expect implementation guidance to be issued in the near future.
Explanation: When evaluating passive voice in professional writing, ask yourself two questions: Is the agent (the doer) necessary here? and Does omitting it serve a clear purpose, or does it just create confusion? Agentless passive is most appropriate when the actor is unknown, irrelevant, or deliberately de-emphasized — and when the focus should stay on actions and outcomes rather than individuals. Option C is the strongest choice because both passive constructions serve a genuine rhetorical purpose. "Has been approved" shifts focus to the completed status of the budget — what matters professionally — rather than who specifically approved it. "Have been notified" similarly emphasizes that the action occurred and the outcome is in place, which is exactly what relevant managers need to know. The sentence is informative, professional, and free of unnecessary ambiguity. Option A uses agentless passive for "was approved" but then switches to an active-style future construction that feels inconsistent in tone. More importantly, it lacks the precision that characterizes purposeful passive use — "it will be implemented" is vague about timeline and responsibility. Option B is actually well-written, but it uses attributed passive ("approved by the CFO"), not agentless passive — so it doesn't demonstrate the strategic omission the question specifically asks about. Option D uses progressive passive ("is being approved"), which signals an ongoing process. This creates real ambiguity in a professional context: if the budget hasn't been approved yet, communicating implementation guidance is premature and confusing. As a study tip, remember that agentless passive works best when the result matters more than the actor — think completed processes, official announcements, and status updates where attribution is either obvious or irrelevant.

Question 6

A workplace safety manual currently reads: 'Supervisors must inspect all equipment before each shift begins.' A technical writer wants to rewrite this sentence using the passive voice so that the procedure—not the person responsible—is emphasized, while still implying that someone must perform the action. Which version BEST accomplishes this?

  1. All equipment is inspected before each shift begins, ensuring that supervisors fulfill their safety obligations under company policy.
  2. All equipment must be inspected before each shift begins, with the inspection carried out according to established safety protocols. (correct answer)
  3. Before each shift begins, it is required that supervisors inspect all equipment in compliance with workplace safety regulations.
  4. All equipment should have been inspected before each shift begins, a standard that reflects the company's commitment to safety.
Explanation: When working with passive voice in professional writing, you need to ask two questions: (1) Is the grammatical subject receiving the action rather than performing it? and (2) Does the sentence still carry the appropriate sense of obligation or necessity? This question tests whether you can identify a passive construction that shifts emphasis away from the actor while preserving modal force. Choice B accomplishes both goals cleanly. "All equipment must be inspected" places "equipment" as the grammatical subject receiving the action, making the procedure central. The modal verb "must" preserves the mandatory tone of the original, so readers understand that someone is still required to perform this task—even without naming who. That's the hallmark of effective procedural passive voice. Choice A uses passive voice ("is inspected") but removes the modal entirely, making the sentence sound descriptive rather than obligatory—as if inspection already happens, not that it must happen. It also reintroduces supervisors, which contradicts the goal of de-emphasizing the responsible party. Choice C is actually active voice in disguise. "It is required that supervisors inspect" still names the actor (supervisors) and uses active infinitive construction. The emphasis remains on who, not what procedure. Choice D uses "should have been inspected," which is past perfect passive—implying the inspection was supposed to happen but perhaps didn't. This introduces ambiguity and shifts the meaning away from a forward-looking safety requirement. A useful strategy: when evaluating passive voice rewrites, confirm three things—subject receives action, actor is backgrounded, and the modal verb matches the original's level of obligation. B checks all three boxes.

Question 7

A graduate student is revising a thesis introduction. The original draft reads: 'Previous scholars have largely ignored the role of regional dialects in shaping early literacy outcomes. This gap has motivated my research.' The student's advisor notes that the second sentence inappropriately uses first-person reference and should be revised to use passive voice, while the first sentence, though active, is acceptable as written.

Which revision of ONLY the second sentence correctly uses passive voice, removes the first-person reference, and preserves the logical relationship between the gap and the research motivation?

  1. This gap has been largely overlooked, and it has motivated the present research into early literacy outcomes across regional dialect communities.
  2. This gap in the literature has been identified, and the research was consequently motivated to address the shortcomings of previous studies.
  3. It is this gap that has motivated the research presented in the following chapters, as identified by the existing literature.
  4. The present research has been motivated by this gap in the existing scholarship on regional dialects and early literacy development. (correct answer)
Explanation: When revising academic writing to use passive voice, you need to check three things simultaneously: Is the first-person reference removed? Is the grammatical structure genuinely passive? Does the revision preserve the original logical meaning without adding or distorting information? The original sentence, "This gap has motivated my research," contains a clear cause-and-effect relationship: the gap (cause) → motivated research (effect). The revision must keep this exact relationship while converting the verb to passive voice and eliminating "my." Choice D accomplishes all three goals cleanly. "The present research has been motivated by this gap" is properly formed passive voice (subject + has been + past participle + by-phrase), removes any first-person reference, and faithfully preserves the causal logic without introducing new claims. Choice A fails because it rewrites the first sentence as well ("largely overlooked"), which the advisor specifically said to leave unchanged. It also adds content about "regional dialect communities" that wasn't in the original second sentence. Choice B introduces a tone problem: saying the research "was consequently motivated to address shortcomings" implies the research itself has agency, and the phrasing "motivated to address" subtly changes the meaning from the gap inspiring research to the research having an objective goal. Choice C uses a cleft construction ("It is this gap that...") rather than true passive voice, and the phrase "as identified by the existing literature" adds an unsupported claim not present in the original. A useful strategy: when a question asks you to revise only one sentence, immediately eliminate any answer that touches the other sentence. This alone rules out A and helps you focus on B, C, and D for the real grammatical and logical comparison.

Question 8

An engineering student submits the following paragraph in a lab report: 'First, we heated the solution to 80°C. Then, we filtered it through a membrane. After that, we collected the precipitate and we weighed it on a calibrated scale. Finally, we recorded all measurements in the data log.'

The instructor marks the paragraph for revision, noting that lab reports in this discipline require passive voice throughout to maintain objectivity and remove personal reference. Which of the following versions of ONLY the third sentence ('After that, we collected the precipitate and we weighed it on a calibrated scale.') is grammatically correct, appropriately passive, and free of errors in tense or structure?

  1. After that, the precipitate was collected and was weighed on a calibrated scale, with both steps completed in sequence. (correct answer)
  2. After that, the precipitate had been collected and weighed on a calibrated scale by the research team conducting the experiment.
  3. After that, the precipitate was collected and weighed it on a calibrated scale, removing the need for personal reference.
  4. After that, the precipitate was being collected and was weighed on a calibrated scale as part of the standard procedure.
Explanation: When a question asks you to convert active voice to passive voice in academic or technical writing, focus on two things: grammatical structure and consistency of voice. Passive voice follows the pattern subject + "to be" verb + past participle, and when two actions are joined by "and," both verbs must follow the same pattern. The original sentence has two actions: collecting the precipitate and weighing it. A correct passive revision needs both verbs properly passivized while keeping the tense consistent with the rest of the lab report (simple past, since these are completed actions). Answer A does exactly this — "the precipitate was collected and weighed" uses simple past passive for both verbs, and the phrase "with both steps completed in sequence" adds accurate clarifying context without introducing any grammatical errors. This is your correct answer. Answer B uses the past perfect ("had been collected"), which implies the collecting happened before another past event — a tense shift not supported by the context. It also reintroduces a personal reference ("by the research team"), which the instructor specifically asked to eliminate. Answer C is a hybrid error: "was collected" is correctly passive, but "weighed it" switches back to active voice mid-sentence, leaving the personal subject implied and the object "it" dangling awkwardly. The revision is incomplete. Answer D uses "was being collected," which is past progressive passive — suggesting an ongoing action rather than a completed one. This conflicts with the lab report's simple past timeline and misrepresents what actually happened. As a quick tip: in passive voice conversions, always check every verb in a compound sentence — one unconverted verb can make the whole sentence grammatically inconsistent.

Question 9

The following is an excerpt from a business process document: 'After the client submits the application, our team reviews it for completeness. If any documents are missing, our staff contacts the client within two business days. Once all documents are received, our team forwards the complete file to the underwriting department.'

A process documentation specialist wants to revise the entire passage to use passive voice consistently, remove all references to 'our team' and 'our staff' to create a company-neutral, procedure-focused document, and maintain the conditional logic of the original. Which revision BEST accomplishes all three goals?

  1. After the application is submitted by the client, it is reviewed for completeness. If any documents are found to be missing, the client is contacted within two business days. Once all documents are received, the complete file is forwarded to the underwriting department. (correct answer)
  2. Once the application has been submitted, our review process checks it for completeness. If any documents are missing, the client must be notified within two business days. The complete file is then forwarded to underwriting once all materials have been gathered.
  3. After the application is submitted, it is reviewed for completeness by the assigned reviewer. If any documents are missing, the client is to be contacted within two business days by staff. Once all documents are received, the file gets forwarded to the underwriting department.
  4. After the application has been submitted by the client, completeness is reviewed by the team. Missing documents result in client contact being made within two business days. The complete file will be forwarded to the underwriting department upon receipt of all materials.
Explanation: When revising a document for voice, tone, and structure consistency, you need to check every sentence against all stated requirements simultaneously — not just one at a time. Here, three goals must all be met: consistent passive voice, no references to "our team" or "our staff," and preserved conditional logic ("if...then" relationships). Answer A accomplishes all three goals cleanly. Every clause uses true passive voice ("is submitted," "is reviewed," "is contacted," "is forwarded"). There are no agent references like "our team" or "our staff" — the focus stays on the procedure itself. Crucially, the conditional logic remains intact: the "if documents are missing" clause directly triggers the client contact requirement, just as in the original. Answer B fails on multiple counts. It reintroduces an active construction ("our review process checks it") and retains agency language. It also shifts the conditional relationship slightly, making it feel more like a sequence than a true condition. Answer C uses passive voice in most places, but it reintroduces human agents ("by the assigned reviewer," "by staff"), which violates the company-neutral requirement. It also uses the informal "gets forwarded," which is inconsistent in tone. Answer D attempts passive voice but produces awkward, unclear constructions like "completeness is reviewed by the team" — which still includes "the team" — and "client contact being made," which is grammatically clunky and obscures the conditional trigger. A useful strategy: when a question lists multiple revision criteria, create a quick mental checklist and test each answer against every criterion. One flaw in any category eliminates that choice.

Question 10

Read the following excerpt from a company policy document: 'Employees are required to submit expense reports within 30 days of travel. Reports submitted after this deadline will not be reimbursed. Exceptions to this policy may be granted under extraordinary circumstances, but employees must request them in writing.'

A supervisor wants to revise the final sentence so that the entire sentence uses passive voice consistently, maintains the conditional relationship between the exception and the written request, and does not alter the policy's meaning. Which revision BEST meets all three criteria?

  1. Exceptions to this policy may be granted under extraordinary circumstances, but a written request must be submitted by the employee seeking the exception.
  2. Exceptions to this policy may be granted under extraordinary circumstances, provided that they are requested in writing by the affected employee. (correct answer)
  3. Exceptions to this policy may be granted under extraordinary circumstances, but they must be requested in writing before the deadline has passed.
  4. Exceptions to this policy may be granted under extraordinary circumstances, but only when a written request has been submitted and approved by management.
Explanation: When a question asks you to revise a sentence for consistent passive voice while preserving meaning and logical structure, you need to check three things simultaneously: (1) Is every verb construction passive? (2) Is the conditional relationship intact? (3) Does the meaning stay the same? In the original sentence, "employees must request them in writing" uses active voice — the subject employees performs the action. The revision needs to flip this so the action happens to a subject, following the pattern of "may be granted" already established in the first clause. Choice B — "provided that they are requested in writing by the affected employee" — is correct on all three counts. "Are requested" is passive voice, matching "may be granted." The word provided that signals a conditional relationship (exceptions are only possible if a written request exists), and no new information is added or removed. Choice A uses passive voice ("must be submitted"), which is fine grammatically, but it shifts the emphasis by describing submission of a report rather than a request for an exception — subtly distorting the policy's meaning. Choice C introduces an additional condition ("before the deadline has passed") that does not appear in the original sentence. Adding new policy content changes the meaning, which violates one of the criteria. Choice D adds the phrase "and approved by management," which is another invented condition. The original policy says nothing about managerial approval, so this revision alters the policy's meaning significantly. Your strategy: when revising for passive voice, convert every active verb, then re-read the sentence to confirm no extra conditions were accidentally introduced — that's the most common trap on revision questions.