5th Grade ELA Quiz: Read Grade Level Informational Texts
20 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Read Grade Level Informational TextsQuestion 1 of 20

A Small City, Big Water Problem
Sofia's town is near a lake, so people think water will always be plentiful. But in late summer, the lake level sometimes drops, and the water gets warmer. Warmer water can hold less oxygen. Fish need that oxygen to survive. At the same time, fertilizer from nearby lawns and farms may wash into the lake after rain.

Fertilizer has nutrients that help plants grow. In water, those nutrients can make algae grow very fast. This sudden growth is called an algal bloom. At first, a bloom may look like a green paint spill on the surface. But the real problem often comes later.

When the algae die, bacteria break them down. That process uses up oxygen. So the amount of oxygen in the water can fall. As a result, fish and other animals may struggle, especially if the lake is already warm. The town noticed that fish were staying near the surface, where the oxygen was a little higher.

Local leaders talked about several fixes. They asked people to use less fertilizer and to plant native grasses near the shore. These grasses act like a filter. They slow the runoff and trap soil. The town also tested the water more often, because good choices need good information.

By early fall, the lake got better. The leaders saw that the lake's health depended on many connected things, not one single cause. Sofia realized that protecting water is not only a science problem. It is also a job for the whole community.

Based on the passage, what caused the fish to struggle in the lake?

The lake became colder, which made the algae stop growing completely.
Too much oxygen entered the lake, which made the fish swim to the bottom.
Warm water and the oxygen being used up as algae broke down together lowered the oxygen.
The native grasses added fertilizer to the lake, which gave the fish more food.
← Back to quizzes

5th Grade ELA Quiz

5th Grade ELA Quiz: Read Grade Level Informational Texts

Practice Read Grade Level Informational Texts in 5th Grade ELA with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Read Grade Level Informational Texts, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for 5th Grade ELA.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A Small City, Big Water Problem
Sofia's town is near a lake, so people think water will always be plentiful. But in late summer, the lake level sometimes drops, and the water gets warmer. Warmer water can hold less oxygen. Fish need that oxygen to survive. At the same time, fertilizer from nearby lawns and farms may wash into the lake after rain.

Fertilizer has nutrients that help plants grow. In water, those nutrients can make algae grow very fast. This sudden growth is called an algal bloom. At first, a bloom may look like a green paint spill on the surface. But the real problem often comes later.

When the algae die, bacteria break them down. That process uses up oxygen. So the amount of oxygen in the water can fall. As a result, fish and other animals may struggle, especially if the lake is already warm. The town noticed that fish were staying near the surface, where the oxygen was a little higher.

Local leaders talked about several fixes. They asked people to use less fertilizer and to plant native grasses near the shore. These grasses act like a filter. They slow the runoff and trap soil. The town also tested the water more often, because good choices need good information.

By early fall, the lake got better. The leaders saw that the lake's health depended on many connected things, not one single cause. Sofia realized that protecting water is not only a science problem. It is also a job for the whole community.

Based on the passage, what caused the fish to struggle in the lake?

  1. The lake became colder, which made the algae stop growing completely.
  2. Too much oxygen entered the lake, which made the fish swim to the bottom.
  3. Warm water and the oxygen being used up as algae broke down together lowered the oxygen. (correct answer)
  4. The native grasses added fertilizer to the lake, which gave the fish more food.
Explanation: The passage says warm water holds less oxygen, and when algae die, bacteria use up even more oxygen, so both together lowered the oxygen the fish needed. Choice C names both causes, so it is correct. Choice A says the lake got colder, Choice B says too much oxygen entered, and Choice D says grasses added fertilizer, none of which the passage states.

Question 2

How a Bill Becomes a Law (In a Simple Way)
In a democracy, people share power. They choose leaders, and they follow laws that apply to everyone. A law does not usually appear overnight. Instead, it is made through a careful process. A rule that affects many people should be looked at from more than one angle.

A new idea for a law often begins as a proposal. A community member might notice a problem, like unsafe crosswalks. That person can ask an elected leader to help. The leader can write the idea as a bill, which is a written plan for a possible law.

Next, a group of lawmakers may talk about the bill in a committee. They might check facts, listen to experts, and change the wording. This step matters because small changes in words can have a big effect. For example, the word "may" gives a choice, but the word "must" requires action.

After that, lawmakers talk it over and vote. If the bill passes, it may be sent to another group of lawmakers to look at again. This second check can slow things down, but it also helps stop careless choices. Finally, if leaders approve the bill, it becomes a law.

Even after a law is passed, people can see whether it works well. If it causes new problems, lawmakers can suggest changes. In this way, a democracy is not only about voting. It is also about making rules better over time.

As used in paragraph 2, what does the word proposal mean?

  1. An argument that two lawmakers cannot easily settle.
  2. A finished rule that people are required to follow.
  3. A sum of money the government asks people to pay.
  4. An idea offered so that others can think it over. (correct answer)
Explanation: In paragraph 2, a proposal is what a person suggests after noticing a problem, such as unsafe crosswalks. It is an early idea shared so others can consider it, which matches the choice about an idea offered for others to think over. The choice about an argument two lawmakers cannot settle describes a disagreement, but a proposal is a plan, not a fight. The choice about a finished rule people must follow describes a law, which comes at the very end of the process, not the beginning where a proposal starts. The choice about money the government asks people to pay describes a payment or tax, which has nothing to do with suggesting a plan. Only one choice fits the meaning of an idea put forward for others to weigh.

Question 3

From Ore to Object: The Journey of Aluminum
Aluminum is used in many products, from bikes to food cans. It is light, does not rust easily, and can be shaped in many ways. But aluminum does not start out as shiny metal. It begins as a rock called bauxite. The rock must go through several steps.

First, miners take bauxite out of the ground. Then factories crush it and treat it with chemicals. This pulls out a white powder called alumina. Next, workers use electricity to turn the powder into aluminum metal. This step needs a lot of energy. So plants are often built where power is cheap.

Making new aluminum takes so much power that recycling really helps. When aluminum is recycled, it can be melted and used again. It does not have to go through every early step. So recycling can save energy. It can also lower the need for new mining. And it cuts the trash sent to dumps.

Still, recycling only works when people take part. Towns need bins and pickup programs. People must sort their trash with care. A greasy can, for example, might ruin a whole batch.

The full story of aluminum shows how small choices connect to big systems. When a student drops a can in the right bin, that small act helps save resources.

What is the author's main purpose in writing this passage?

  1. To explain how aluminum is made and why recycling it can save energy and resources. (correct answer)
  2. To describe the steps of making aluminum and warn that recycling wastes more energy than it saves.
  3. To explain how bauxite becomes metal and argue that mining new aluminum is always the better choice.
  4. To tell the story of one young miner who discovers bauxite and learns how to recycle old cans.
Explanation: The passage first walks through how aluminum is made from bauxite, then explains that recycling saves energy and resources because it skips many early steps. The best choice names both of those ideas, which matches the whole passage. One choice describes the steps correctly but then says recycling wastes energy, which is the opposite of what the text says. Another choice starts right but claims mining new aluminum is always better, even though the passage says recycling really helps and saves power. The last choice turns the passage into a story about a young miner and his adventure, but this is an informational text with facts, not a made-up tale. So only the choice that covers both making aluminum and saving resources through recycling fits the author's real purpose.

Question 4

[Paragraph 1] In a democracy, citizens have a voice in how their community is run. They can use that voice in a few ways. They can vote, speak at meetings, and contact leaders.

[Paragraph 2] Voting is one of the most familiar tools. When citizens vote, they choose leaders or decide on issues. But voting alone does not solve every problem, because leaders still need to know what people need.

[Paragraph 3] Another tool is public discussion. A town council may hold a meeting. People there share ideas about parks and roads. One speech may not change a decision. But many voices together can show what matters.

[Paragraph 4] Citizens can also write to their leaders. A clear message with reasons works well. It beats a complaint with no details.

[Paragraph 5] Taking part takes time, and not everyone agrees. Still, these tools are connected. They help leaders make choices, and they help citizens hold leaders responsible.

Which detail from the passage best supports the idea that voting is important but not enough by itself?

  1. Casting a vote matters, but by itself it cannot show leaders everything the people actually need. (correct answer)
  2. Taking part in a democracy takes time, and citizens do not always agree with one another.
  3. When citizens vote, they get to choose their leaders or decide important community issues.
  4. In a democracy, every citizen has a real voice in how their whole community is run.
Explanation: The best answer says voting matters but by itself cannot show leaders everything people need. That is exactly the idea in the stem: voting is important, yet it is not enough on its own. The choice about taking time and people disagreeing is true from the passage, but it is about the effort of participating, not about voting being incomplete. The choice about choosing leaders and deciding issues only tells what voting does; it never says voting falls short. The choice about every citizen having a voice is a broad opening idea about democracy in general, not a detail about the limits of voting. Only the first choice supports both parts of the stem's idea, so it is correct.

Question 5

Read the passage, then answer the question.

Turning Sunlight into Sugar: Photosynthesis

Plants cannot walk to find food, so they make their own. The process is called photosynthesis (using sunlight to make sugar). Although it sounds like magic, it is a set of chemical steps that happen mostly in leaves.

First, a plant takes in carbon dioxide from the air through tiny openings. It also pulls water up from the soil through its roots. Inside the leaf, a green substance called chlorophyll captures light energy. This energy helps the plant combine carbon dioxide and water into sugar.

Sugar is important because it stores energy. The plant can use that energy to grow new leaves, build roots, or produce flowers. Some of the sugar may be stored for later, like saving money in a bank. In addition, oxygen is released during photosynthesis, which is one reason animals can breathe.

However, photosynthesis does not happen equally fast all the time. If a plant does not get enough light or water, the process slows. Temperature also matters, because chemical reactions often work best within a certain range. When conditions improve, photosynthesis can increase again.

Scientists measure photosynthesis to understand ecosystems, which are communities of living things and their environment. When plants make more sugar, they can support more insects and animals. Consequently, a change in sunlight or rainfall can affect many living things, not just the plants.

Which detail best supports the idea that photosynthesis affects more than just plants?

  1. Temperature matters because the chemical reactions inside animals often work best within a certain range.
  2. Plants cannot walk to find food, so they and nearby animals must make their own sugar.
  3. Oxygen is released during photosynthesis, which is one reason animals can breathe. (correct answer)
  4. A plant takes in carbon dioxide that animals breathe out through tiny openings in its leaves.
Explanation: The claim you must support is that photosynthesis affects more than just plants. The best answer explains that oxygen is released during photosynthesis, and that this oxygen is one reason animals can breathe. That directly connects the process to living things beyond the plant itself. The temperature choice sounds broad, but the passage says temperature affects the chemical reactions of photosynthesis in the plant, not reactions inside animals, so it misstates the text. The choice about plants not walking talks only about how a plant feeds itself; it does not show any effect on other living things, and the passage never says nearby animals make their own sugar. The carbon dioxide choice describes something the plant takes IN to run photosynthesis; even though it mentions animals breathing out, it explains an ingredient the plant uses, not an effect the process has on others. Only the oxygen detail shows photosynthesis reaching beyond the plant, so it is the single best answer.

Question 6

In the 1800s, many settlers in the United States moved west. Some hoped to find farmland. Others wanted to start new businesses. This movement of people is called migration.

The land itself shaped where settlers could go. Rivers helped in some places. But mountains and deserts slowed the wagons. So some routes, like passes through the mountains, became very important.

New tools also changed the trip. The telegraph let messages travel fast between faraway towns. Later, railroads joined regions and made shipping goods faster than a wagon.

But moving west was not only about speed. Settlers had to work together to get through hard weather and low supplies. For example, wagon groups shared tools, fixed wheels together, and took turns watching the animals.

Today, historians study this move west. They look at journals, maps, and photos. These show the hopes people had and the problems they faced.

What is the main idea of the passage?

  1. New tools like the telegraph and railroads were the single most important reason that settlers chose to travel west during the 1800s.
  2. Historians today study old journals, maps, and photos to learn about the hopes and problems that settlers faced along the way.
  3. Rivers, mountains, and desert passes were the only things that decided where settlers could safely build farms and new businesses.
  4. Westward migration happened for different reasons and was shaped by geography, technology, and the need to cooperate. (correct answer)
Explanation: The passage covers several parts of the move west: settlers had different reasons for going, the land shaped their routes, new tools changed the trip, and people had to cooperate. The correct answer pulls all of these together, so it names the true main idea. The choice about new tools being the single most important reason takes one detail and overstates it—the passage says settlers moved for farmland and business, not because of tools. The choice about historians studying journals, maps, and photos is true, but it only describes the last paragraph, not the whole passage. The choice about rivers, mountains, and passes being the 'only' things that decided where settlers went is too extreme; geography was one factor, not the only one. Only the answer that combines reasons, geography, technology, and cooperation captures the whole passage.

Question 7

Night Lights and Migrating Birds
Each spring and fall, many birds migrate. They travel long distances to find food and safer nesting places. Migration is more than a single flight. It is a pattern that happens year after year. Some birds travel at night. They use the stars, the moon, and Earth's magnetic field to help them stay on course.

In recent years, scientists have studied how city lights affect these night travelers. Bright lights can confuse birds, especially when clouds hide the stars. Instead of flying in a steady direction, some birds circle around tall buildings. This extra flying uses energy they need for the rest of their trip.

The problem gets worse during storms. Wind and rain already make flying hard, and lights can add another challenge. As a result, tired birds may land in unsafe places, such as busy streets or areas with few trees. Many birds survive, but the risk goes up when thousands migrate at once.

Some communities have tried a plan called "lights out." During the busiest migration weeks, certain buildings turn off lights they do not need at night. This does not stop migration, but it can lower confusion and help birds save energy. It also saves electricity, which is good for people and the environment.

Researchers keep studying which kinds of lights cause the most trouble and which changes help the most. The goal is not to make cities dark. The goal is to balance human needs with the needs of wildlife.

What is the relationship between storms and city lights in the passage?

  1. Storms and city lights are two separate problems, so birds face them only during different seasons of the year.
  2. Storms are the only real danger, and city lights actually help tired birds see safe places to land during bad weather.
  3. Storms cause city lights to turn off automatically, which is why birds migrate more easily and quickly when weather is bad.
  4. Storms already make flying hard, and city lights can add confusion that raises the risk for migrating birds. (correct answer)
Explanation: The passage says the problem "gets worse during storms" because wind and rain already make flying hard, and then lights add another challenge on top of that. The best answer shows both troubles piling up and raising the danger for birds. The choice that calls them two separate problems for different seasons is wrong because the passage describes them happening at the same time, making things worse together. The choice that says lights help birds land safely is wrong because the passage says lights confuse birds and lead them to unsafe places like busy streets. The choice that says storms turn lights off is wrong because it is people in the "lights out" plan who turn lights off, not storms, and the passage never says storms make migration easier.

Question 8

The Branches of Government: Sharing Power

Many countries use systems that divide power. Putting all the power in one place can be risky. In the United States, the Constitution created three branches of government. Each branch has different jobs. Each one can also limit the others. People call this a set of checks and balances.

The legislative branch makes laws. It includes elected leaders who debate ideas and vote. The executive branch carries out the laws. That means it puts decisions into action. The judicial branch explains laws. It decides what they mean when people disagree.

These jobs are connected. For example, lawmakers may pass a law, but it might be challenged in court. If judges decide the law goes against the Constitution, it may not be used. The executive branch must follow court decisions, even if leaders disagree.

The system can feel slow, and that is partly the point. When several groups must agree, they are more likely to think a decision through. But the system also needs teamwork. If the branches refuse to work together, big problems may take longer to solve.

Understanding the branches helps people follow the news and take part in their communities. When people know who is in charge of what, they can ask better questions and make better choices.

How is the information in this passage organized?

  1. It describes each of the three branches by explaining its role and how the branches work together. (correct answer)
  2. It lists the steps for passing a single new law, one action after another in order.
  3. It follows one leader through time, from an early childhood up to becoming the president.
  4. It builds a case that one branch should hold far more power than the other two branches.
Explanation: The passage takes the branches one at a time, tells what each one does, and then explains how they limit and depend on each other. That is a describe-and-connect structure, which is exactly what the correct choice names. The choice about listing steps in order for passing one law is wrong because the text never gives a start-to-finish set of directions; it explains ongoing jobs, not a single procedure. The choice about following one leader through time is wrong because there is no person's life story here—no childhood, no single person's timeline. The choice about building a case for one branch is wrong because the passage never argues that any branch should have more power; it shows the branches balancing and sharing power. Only the first choice matches how the text is actually built.

Question 9

A New Home, A New Community: Settlers and Adaptation

When settlers moved into new regions, they did not only travel across land. They also entered new climates and landscapes. Some arrived expecting to farm the same way they had before. But the soil, rain, and growing seasons were often different. So their old methods did not always work.

In one coastal area, newcomers planted crops that needed dry fields. But frequent rain flooded the rows. After several hard seasons, they watched how local Indigenous communities grew food. These communities used raised planting mounds. They also chose crops that grew well in wet ground. The settlers began to adapt. They combined their own tools with the new methods.

Adapting took more than copying. Settlers had to figure out which changes mattered most and why. For example, a raised mound did more than keep plants above water. It also warmed the soil and let water drain. When settlers understood the reasons, they could adjust the method for different fields.

Over time, the community's food changed too. People learned to use local plants and fish. They traded with neighbors for things they could not grow. This trade built friendships, but it also made them depend on certain routes and seasons.

The story shows that moving to a new place often makes people solve problems step by step. The settlers brought knowledge with them. But they did best when they stayed curious and learned from the land and from others.

Based on the passage, what can you infer about the settlers' early farming attempts?

  1. They quickly gave up on farming and chose to survive mostly by catching fish in the coastal waters.
  2. They copied the raised mounds right away because they already knew those methods worked in wet soil.
  3. They struggled at first because they used farming methods that did not fit the rainy, coastal land. (correct answer)
  4. They had good harvests from the start because the climate closely matched the land they left behind.
Explanation: The passage says the newcomers planted crops that needed dry fields, but heavy rain flooded the rows for several hard seasons. From this you can infer their first methods did not fit the wet, coastal land, which is the correct answer. The choice about surviving mostly by fishing is wrong because the passage shows they kept farming and later learned to grow food in new ways. The choice about copying raised mounds right away is wrong because they only learned that method after watching local communities through several hard seasons. The choice about good harvests from the start is wrong because the passage says the soil, rain, and seasons were different, so their old methods did not work well.

Question 10

Soil may look like plain dirt, but it is a mix of minerals, air, water, and tiny pieces of once-living things. Healthy soil supports gardens, farms, and forests.

Soil forms slowly. First, rocks break into smaller pieces through weathering. Water can freeze in cracks and push them apart, and plant roots can split rocks too. Over time, these pieces mix with rotted leaves and other bits of once-living matter.

The top layer is called topsoil. It is usually dark because it has many nutrients. Below it, subsoil has fewer nutrients and often more clay. Subsoil can hold water, but many plant roots grow best in topsoil.

Soil can be lost faster than it forms. When heavy rain hits bare ground, runoff can carry topsoil away. Wind can also move dry soil, especially in places with few plants.

Farmers and gardeners use ways to slow erosion. They may plant cover crops, leave some plant material on the ground, or build steps called terraces on slopes. These methods slow water and wind, which helps soil stay in place.

How does the last paragraph relate to the rest of the passage?

  1. It describes how topsoil and subsoil form, adding detail to the earlier explanation of soil layers.
  2. It explains the weathering steps that break rocks apart, continuing the earlier account of how soil is made.
  3. It lists ways wind and rain carry soil away, giving more examples of the erosion problem described earlier.
  4. It offers ways to fix a problem explained earlier, since soil can be lost through erosion. (correct answer)
Explanation: An earlier paragraph explains a problem: heavy rain and wind can carry topsoil away, so soil is lost through erosion. The last paragraph answers that problem with fixes like cover crops, leaving plant material on the ground, and terraces. That is why the choice about offering ways to fix the erosion problem is correct. The choice about how topsoil and subsoil form describes the layers paragraph, not the last one. The choice about the weathering steps that break rocks apart describes the paragraph on how soil is made, not the ending. The choice about listing ways wind and rain carry soil away describes the problem paragraph itself, but the last paragraph presents solutions, not more examples of the problem. Only one choice names what the final paragraph actually does: it responds to the erosion problem with methods to slow it.

Question 11

A river can look calm from a bridge, but it is always doing work. As water moves, it carries tiny pieces of rock and soil. Over time, this movement can shape the land in ways that are easy to see, like sandbars, curved banks, and wide floodplains.

The process is called erosion. Erosion means wearing away and moving bits of earth. Erosion happens faster when water flows quickly, especially after heavy rain. When a river bends, the current often hits the outside bank harder, so that side may crumble. At the same time, the inside of the bend can collect sediment and build new land.

These changes can bring both good and bad news for people. Farmers may like floodplains because the soil is often rich. But homes built too close to a shifting bank can be at risk. A river that wears away one side may also drop mud in another place, which can make boats harder to steer.

Towns have tried different fixes. Some build walls or plant trees to hold the soil in place. In other places, people move buildings farther from the river, even though it takes planning and money. Each choice has trade-offs. A wall may protect one spot but speed up erosion downstream.

Scientists and local leaders often study maps and measure how fast the water moves before they decide what to do. No plan can stop a river completely, but careful study can show where the biggest risks are. In the end, understanding erosion helps towns live with the river's slow, powerful work.

Based on the passage, why might a town decide to move buildings farther from the river instead of building a wall?

  1. Because moving buildings can avoid causing faster erosion in other places downstream. (correct answer)
  2. Because moving buildings costs less money and needs less planning than a wall does.
  3. Because moving buildings works better on rich floodplain soil where farms grow well.
  4. Because moving buildings can slow the river down until it stops flowing completely.
Explanation: The passage explains a trade-off: a wall may protect one spot but speed up erosion downstream. Moving buildings avoids causing that faster erosion somewhere else, so the choice about protecting other places downstream is correct. The choice about costing less money is wrong because the passage says moving buildings takes planning and money, not less of it. The choice about floodplain soil is wrong because rich soil helps farmers grow crops, not decide where to put buildings. The choice about slowing the river until it stops is wrong because the passage clearly states no plan can stop a river completely. Only the first choice matches the real reason the passage gives for moving buildings instead of building a wall.

Question 12

[Paragraph 1] If you have ever watched a puddle disappear after a sunny day, you have seen evaporation. That water is not gone. It is moving through the water cycle. The water cycle is a system that recycles Earth's water again and again.

[Paragraph 2] The cycle often begins when the Sun warms oceans, lakes, and damp soil. Liquid water then changes into water vapor, which is a gas. The vapor rises into the air. This change is called evaporation. Plants also release water vapor through tiny openings in their leaves. This is called transpiration.

[Paragraph 3] Higher in the sky, the air is cooler. When water vapor cools, it turns back into tiny drops. This is called condensation. The drops gather around bits of dust in the air and form clouds. Each drop is so small that it can float.

[Paragraph 4] In time, the drops bump into each other and join. When they get big enough, gravity pulls them down as precipitation. This can be rain, snow, sleet, or hail. Some water soaks into the ground. The rest flows over the land as runoff.

[Paragraph 5] Runoff can travel into streams and rivers and carry soil with it. Fast-moving water can cause erosion, which wears away rock and soil. When water slows down, it can drop the soil and form new land.

[Paragraph 6] The water cycle shows how Earth's systems are connected. Water does not follow just one path. It always keeps moving, powered by the Sun and pulled by gravity.

Which statement best summarizes the passage?

  1. Water vapor rises into the cooler air, gathers around dust to form clouds, and later falls back to Earth as different kinds of precipitation.
  2. The water cycle moves water through evaporation, condensation, and precipitation, and the runoff can also change the land. (correct answer)
  3. The Sun warms water into vapor, plants release vapor through their leaves, and this transpiration keeps the whole cycle going.
  4. Fast-moving runoff wears away soil and rock, and when the water slows down it drops that soil and forms brand-new land.
Explanation: A summary has to name the main steps of the whole cycle, not just one part of it. The best answer tells how water evaporates, condenses, and falls as precipitation, and adds that runoff can reshape the land — that covers the passage from start to finish. The choice about vapor rising, gathering on dust, and falling as precipitation is true, but it only describes the middle steps and skips evaporation and how water changes the land. The choice about the Sun, plants, and transpiration picks a couple of real details but makes transpiration sound like the reason the whole cycle keeps going, which the passage never says. The choice about fast runoff wearing away soil and forming new land is accurate, but it only summarizes the last part of the passage, not the entire cycle. Only one answer captures the big picture instead of a single piece.

Question 13

In the 1500s, ships crossed the Atlantic Ocean more often than ever before. People usually remember this time for exploration. But another kind of travel was just as important. Plants moved too. When a crop moved to a new place, it could change what people ate, how they worked, and even where they lived.

One crop that traveled far was maize. Many people today call it corn. Long before Europeans came to the Americas, Indigenous farmers had studied which seeds made the strongest plants. Over many years, they picked seeds from the best harvests. This careful work is sometimes called selective breeding. It means choosing traits on purpose. It made maize easier to grow.

After contact between continents grew, maize seeds were carried on ships to Europe. Later they reached parts of Africa and Asia. Maize spread partly because it could grow in different climates and soils. Some European grains needed cooler weather or special fields. So farmers in new areas could plant maize where other crops struggled.

But the new crop did not solve every problem. In some places, leaders pushed farmers to grow maize because it made a lot of food per acre. Yet when a community leaned on one crop too much, it was less ready for droughts, pests, or plant diseases. This risk is called dependence. It means needing something so much that it is hard to replace.

Maize also changed trade. When harvests grew, some towns had extra food to sell. Markets got bigger. As a result, more people could live in cities. There they worked at crafts and services instead of farming. Still, the benefits were not equal everywhere. Geography, weather, and local choices shaped what happened next.

Which statement best summarizes the passage?

  1. Maize spread to new continents mainly because leaders forced farmers to plant it, and everywhere it went it made communities richer and safer from droughts and diseases.
  2. Maize traveled to new continents, and it changed farming and trade, but it also created risks when people depended on it too much. (correct answer)
  3. Maize came from Indigenous farmers who used selective breeding, and it grew well in many climates, so it fully replaced the older European grains that people once relied on.
  4. Maize helped some towns sell extra food and let more people live in cities, which proves that moving crops between continents always makes life better for everyone.
Explanation: The best summary covers the whole passage: maize moved to new continents, changed how people farmed and traded, and also brought danger when a community leaned on it too much. The choice that says this captures every main idea, so it is correct. The choice claiming leaders forced maize everywhere and that it always made places richer and safer is wrong, because the passage says leaders pushed maize only in some places and that depending on one crop made communities LESS ready for droughts and diseases. The choice saying maize fully replaced European grains goes too far. The passage only says maize could grow where other crops struggled, not that it wiped them out. It also focuses on one detail instead of the whole passage. The choice about cities and selling food uses true details but then claims moving crops "always" makes life better for everyone. The passage ends by saying the benefits were not equal everywhere, so that word makes this choice wrong. A good summary must match the whole text, not just one part or an idea the text never states.

Question 14

[Paragraph 1] Long before airplanes, people traveled and traded using rivers. Rivers were like natural roads. Boats could carry heavy goods more easily than wagons on rough land.

[Paragraph 2] But rivers were not always easy to use. Some had waterfalls or shallow spots that blocked travel. In the 1800s, builders made canals to connect rivers and lakes. Canals are human-made waterways.

[Paragraph 3] Canals often had locks. A lock is a space with gates. The gates can raise or lower a boat by changing the water level. First, a boat enters and the gate closes behind it. Next, water is added or drained until the boat reaches the new height. Finally, the front gate opens and the boat moves on.

[Paragraph 4] Canals changed where people settled. Towns grew near canal routes because workers, shops, and storehouses were needed. Farmers could send crops to faraway cities. City factories could ship tools back to farm areas.

[Paragraph 5] In time, railroads became faster in many places. Even so, canals show how good building can solve land problems. They also shaped where people move and trade.

How is the information in the passage mainly organized?

  1. Compare and contrast, weighing the good and bad points of canals against rivers as ways to travel and trade.
  2. Sequence and cause-effect, showing how canals work and how they changed settlements and trade. (correct answer)
  3. Problem and solution, focused only on why faster railroads replaced canals in the end.
  4. Description, listing the different parts of a lock without any order or reason for the changes.
Explanation: The best answer is sequence and cause-effect. The passage uses time-order words like "First," "Next," and "Finally" to explain how a lock works, and it also shows causes and effects, such as towns growing because canals brought jobs, shops, and trade. The choice about compare and contrast between canals and rivers is wrong because the passage does not weigh their good and bad points side by side; it mostly explains and traces effects. The choice about problem and solution focused only on railroads is wrong because railroads are just one small point at the end, not the whole passage's plan. The choice calling it description of a lock's parts with no order is wrong because the passage clearly uses step-by-step order and gives reasons for what happens, which plain description does not do.

Question 15

Measuring Earth's Shaking: The Richter Scale and Beyond
When the ground shakes during an earthquake, the movement can be gentle or strong. To describe earthquakes, scientists use measurements, not guesses. One early tool was the Richter scale. It compared the size of earthquake waves. A machine called a seismograph recorded the waves.

The Richter scale is special. Each whole number up stands for a much bigger change than it seems. For example, a magnitude 6 earthquake makes waves about ten times larger than a magnitude 5 earthquake. The energy also rises fast. So the difference in damage can be considerable.

But scientists do not use one number alone. They also look at where the earthquake happened and how deep it was. They check what kind of ground is nearby. Soft soil can shake more than solid rock. That can cause more damage in some neighborhoods. So two earthquakes with the same magnitude can have different effects.

Today, scientists use several scales and maps to share the risk. These tools help engineers design safer buildings. They also help towns plan emergency drills. People cannot stop earthquakes. But they can lower the harm by understanding measurements and getting ready.

As used in paragraph 2, what does the word considerable most nearly mean?

  1. Simple to compare against something else.
  2. Slight and barely worth noticing.
  3. Possible to argue or debate about.
  4. Large enough to matter a lot. (correct answer)
Explanation: The passage says a magnitude 6 earthquake makes waves ten times larger than a magnitude 5, and that the energy rises fast, so the difference in damage is big. That matches "large enough to matter a lot." "Slight and barely worth noticing" is the opposite of a big difference, so it does not fit. "Simple to compare against something else" mixes up "considerable" with the idea of comparing, but the word describes size, not ease of comparing. "Possible to argue or debate about" confuses "considerable" with the different word "debatable"; nothing in paragraph 2 is being argued about. Only "large enough to matter a lot" describes how big and important the difference really is.

Question 16

[Paragraph 1] When engineers design a bridge, they do not start by picking paint colors. First, they name the problem. The bridge must safely carry people and cars over something in the way, like a river.

[Paragraph 2] Next, engineers list criteria and constraints. Criteria are goals the design should meet, like holding a certain weight. Constraints are limits, such as a budget or the materials they can use.

[Paragraph 3] Then they build and test models. A model might be a small shape made of wood. It might also be a computer model. If a model bends too much, engineers study why it failed. Then they change the design.

[Paragraph 4] Testing happens more than once. In fact, a good bridge is usually the result of many small fixes, not one perfect idea. Engineers must also think about the weather. Wind, water, and heat can weaken parts over time.

[Paragraph 5] Finally, builders follow the plan to make the bridge. Even while it is being built, workers measure and check it. They make sure the bridge matches the design and stays safe.

As used in paragraph 2, what does the word constraints mean?

  1. Boundaries that hold back what the design is allowed to do. (correct answer)
  2. Goals that the finished design is expected to reach or achieve.
  3. Problems that appear after the model has already been tested.
  4. Choices about how the finished bridge should look to people.
Explanation: In paragraph 2, constraints are described as "limits, such as a budget or the materials they can use." That means constraints are boundaries that hold back what the design is allowed to do, so the answer about boundaries is correct. The choice about goals the design should reach describes criteria, which the passage lists as a separate idea, not constraints. The choice about problems that appear after testing mixes in the model step from paragraph 3, but constraints are set earlier and are not test failures. The choice about how the bridge should look points back to picking paint colors, which the passage says engineers do NOT start with, so it is not a constraint. Only the boundaries choice matches the meaning of limits on what can be done.

Question 17

[Paragraph 1] When people talk about "going to space," they often imagine rockets and astronauts. But the motion of objects in space follows rules that scientists can measure and predict.

[Paragraph 2] An orbit is the curved path an object follows as it moves around another object in space. For example, the Moon orbits Earth. Earth, in turn, orbits the Sun.

[Paragraph 3] Gravity is the force that pulls objects toward one another. Without gravity, the Moon would travel in a straight line and drift away. But Earth's gravity pulls on the Moon. So the Moon keeps curving as it moves forward.

[Paragraph 4] Speed matters too. If an object moves too slowly, gravity will pull it down. If it moves fast enough, it can keep "falling around" a planet instead of crashing into it. This helps explain why satellites stay in orbit.

[Paragraph 5] Scientists use careful math to plan satellite launches. Computers do much of the work today. But the goal is the same: to show how gravity and speed work together to shape motion in space.

What conclusion can be drawn from the passage about why satellites stay in orbit?

  1. Satellites stay in orbit because gravity slowly pulls them down until they gently stop moving.
  2. Satellites stay in orbit because their speed balances the pull of gravity on them. (correct answer)
  3. Satellites stay in orbit because they travel in a straight line far away from Earth.
  4. Satellites stay in orbit because they move too slowly for gravity to pull them down.
Explanation: The passage says that when an object moves fast enough, it keeps "falling around" a planet instead of crashing into it. That means a satellite's speed works together with gravity to keep it curving in orbit, which is why the answer about speed balancing gravity is correct. The choice saying gravity pulls a satellite down until it stops is wrong because the passage explains that gravity pulling too hard would make an object fall, not stay in orbit. The choice about traveling in a straight line far from Earth is wrong because the passage says an object without gravity's pull would drift away in a straight line, not stay in orbit. The choice saying satellites move too slowly is wrong because the passage states that moving too slowly lets gravity pull an object down; satellites must move fast enough to keep orbiting.

Question 18

[Paragraph 1] Many animals migrate. This means they move from one area to another during the year. Migration can seem strange. But it often helps animals find food, safer weather, or places to raise their young.

[Paragraph 2] One example is the monarch butterfly. In late summer and fall, monarchs in parts of North America travel very far. Some travel thousands of miles. They fly to warmer forests in Mexico and along the California coast.

[Paragraph 3] Scientists have studied how monarchs find their way. They learned that monarchs use the place of the Sun in the sky. They also use a kind of clock inside their bodies. This clock helps them adjust as the Sun moves during the day.

[Paragraph 4] Migration also has risks. Storms can blow the insects off course. Homes along the route may be lost if forests are cut down. As a result, fewer resting spots can make the trip harder.

[Paragraph 5] Migration depends on many homes that are linked together. So saving only one place is not enough. Some groups work with people in different areas. This helps monarchs finish their long trip.

According to the passage, what made migration more difficult for some monarch butterflies?

  1. Monarchs began migrating in the spring instead of in the fall.
  2. Scientists stopped the monarchs from traveling by studying them too closely.
  3. Forests and other habitats along the route were reduced, leaving fewer places to rest. (correct answer)
  4. Monarchs stopped using the Sun to help them find their way.
Explanation: The passage says homes along the route may be lost when forests are cut down, which leaves fewer resting spots and makes the trip harder. Choice C matches that, so it is correct. Choice A changes the season, Choice B blames scientists, and Choice D says monarchs stopped using the Sun, none of which the passage states.

Question 19

[Paragraph 1] In the early 1900s, many U.S. cities grew fast because factories offered jobs. But crowded areas created new problems. Streets often filled with trash and dirty water.

[Paragraph 2] City leaders began to study how germs spread. Scientists had shown that some illnesses could travel through dirty water. So several cities built water plants. There, the water was filtered and cleaned before it reached homes.

[Paragraph 3] Clean water helped, but it was not the only problem. In many places, garbage was dumped in open piles. Rats and flies came to the waste. They could carry disease. So cities set up regular trash pickup. They also made rules about where waste could be stored.

[Paragraph 4] These changes took planning and money. Some people complained about new taxes. Others said that public health was a shared job. Over time, the changes proved important. Fewer people got sick during outbreaks.

[Paragraph 5] Today, most people turn on a faucet without thinking. Still, clean water and trash systems were not an accident. They were built after towns studied problems and chose solutions.

Based on the passage, why did some residents likely accept higher taxes even if they did not like them?

  1. They believed paying more could help prevent disease and protect the whole community. (correct answer)
  2. They believed the taxes could force the factories to leave and stop the crowded cities from growing.
  3. They believed the money could pay to remove the water plants and go back to the older ways.
  4. They believed the trash rules could apply mostly to factories rather than to their own homes.
Explanation: The passage says some people argued that public health was a shared job, and that after the changes fewer people got sick during outbreaks. This supports the idea that residents accepted higher taxes because paying more could help prevent disease and protect the whole community. The choice about taxes forcing factories to leave is wrong because the passage says factories offered jobs and never says people wanted them gone or that taxes could remove them. The choice about paying to remove the water plants reverses the passage, which explains that cities built water plants to clean water, not that people wanted them taken away. The choice about trash rules applying mostly to factories misreads paragraph 3, which says the rules were about where waste could be stored for everyone, not only factories. Only the first choice matches the reason the passage gives.

Question 20

[Paragraph 1] An ecosystem is a group of living things, like plants and animals, that live together with their surroundings. Even a small pond can be an ecosystem. Many living things there depend on one another.

[Paragraph 2] In a pond, algae and water plants catch sunlight and make food. This is called photosynthesis. These plants are called producers, and they form the base of a food web. Small insects and snails eat the plants. Then fish may eat the insects.

[Paragraph 3] Not every living thing gets energy by hunting or grazing. Decomposers, like tiny bacteria and fungi, break down dead plants and animals. This returns nutrients to the water and mud. That helps the plants grow again.

[Paragraph 4] A change in one part of the pond can affect many others. For example, if dirt blocks the sunlight, plants may grow more slowly. Then there is less food for the insects. The number of fish may drop too.

[Paragraph 5] Scientists often study a pond by looking for how things are linked. When they watch a pond over time, they can see which changes last only a little while. They can also see which ones last a long time.

As used in paragraph 3, what does the word returns most nearly mean?

  1. Earns a reward.
  2. Goes back or gives back. (correct answer)
  3. Refuses to share.
  4. Turns around quickly.
Explanation: In "This returns nutrients to the water and mud," decomposers give the nutrients back to the pond so plants can use them again, so "returns" means gives back. Choice B matches that, so it is correct. Choice A is about a reward, Choice C is about refusing, and Choice D is about spinning, none of which fits giving nutrients back.