All questions
Question 1
In 2016, a new bus route opened in the city of Mesa Verde. The route connected the public library, the soccer fields, and the main grocery store. Before the route opened, many families walked more than a mile to buy food. The city added 6 bus stops and scheduled buses every 30 minutes on weekdays.
A transit planner named Carlos Rivera studied how people traveled. "Transportation is a link to opportunity," he said at a town meeting. After three months, the city surveyed riders. According to the survey, 58% of riders used the bus to reach jobs or job training. Another 27% used it to reach school programs or the library.
The buses were not always full, but the driver noticed more riders on rainy days. Some people carried sports bags, and others carried grocery bags. The city council planned to review the route again at the end of the year.
What does the passage imply about why the city created the new bus route?
- The city created the route to make sure families kept walking more than a mile to reach food.
- The city created the route to fill empty buses so they would look busy on rainy days.
- The city created the route to help people reach important places more easily. (correct answer)
- The city created the route to move the library, fields, and store closer to each family's home.
Explanation: The passage says the route connects the library, the soccer fields, and the grocery store, and the survey shows most riders use it to reach jobs, training, and school. Putting these clues together, the city built the route to help people reach important places more easily, so that is the best answer.
The choice about keeping families walking a mile gets the purpose backward: the passage says families had to walk before, which is the problem the route was meant to solve. The choice about filling empty buses on rainy days uses a real detail (more riders on rainy days) but that was something the driver noticed, not a reason the city built the route. The choice about moving the library, fields, and store misreads the text: the route carries people to those places, but it does not move the buildings closer to homes.
Question 2
Read the passage.
Yuki Tanaka entered a school "invention fair" in Denver, Colorado, in May (2025). She wanted to solve a small problem at home: her family kept losing the TV remote. Yuki built a remote holder that attached to the side of the couch with a wide strap. The holder had a bright yellow pocket and a small bell.
First, Yuki measured the couch arm so the strap would fit tightly. Then she sewed the pocket using thick thread. Next, she tested the holder for a week and wrote notes about what went wrong. Finally, she made the pocket deeper after the remote fell out twice.
At the fair, a judge asked why she used a bell. Yuki answered, "If the remote is missing, you can shake the pocket and listen." The judge smiled and wrote on the score sheet. Yuki did not win first prize, but she kept improving the design for her family.
Based on the passage, what can you infer about Yuki's attitude toward her invention?
- She cared mostly about winning the fair, and she lost interest in the holder once she did not get first prize.
- She cared about improving it, even without winning first prize. (correct answer)
- She was proud of her first design and felt it was already finished, so she saw no reason to keep changing the pocket.
- She thought the bell mattered more than the pocket, since a sound would help her family more than a place to store it.
Explanation: The passage never states Yuki's attitude directly, so you have to gather clues. She tested the holder for a whole week, wrote notes about problems, made the pocket deeper after the remote fell out, and kept improving the design even after she did not win first prize. Put together, these clues show she cared about making the invention work well for her family—that is why caring about improving it, even without winning, is the best answer.
The choice saying she lost interest after losing is wrong because the passage clearly says she kept improving the design after the fair. The choice saying she felt the design was already finished is wrong because she changed the pocket more than once when problems came up. The choice saying she thought the bell mattered more than the pocket twists her words—she explained the bell only helps you find a missing remote, not that it replaces the pocket. Only one answer matches all the evidence about how she felt about her work.
Question 3
Read the passage.
Keisha and her uncle visited a wetland park near Houston, Texas, in April (2021). The park had a boardwalk made of wooden planks. A wetland is an area where water covers the soil for part of the year. The guide explained that wetlands can include marshes, swamps, and bogs.
Keisha saw tall grasses and clusters of cattails near the water. She also noticed tiny fish swimming in shallow pools. A turtle rested on a log, and a heron stood still, watching the water. "If you stay quiet, you will see more," the guide whispered.
Later, Keisha read a sign that said wetlands help slow floods by holding extra water. The sign also explained that wetland plants can filter dirty water as it moves through the soil. When Keisha and her uncle left, her shoes were still clean because they stayed on the boardwalk.
Which sentence from the text shows that wetlands can help prevent flooding?
- "If you stay quiet, you will see more," the guide whispered.
- Later, Keisha read a sign that said wetlands help slow floods by holding extra water. (correct answer)
- Keisha saw tall grasses and clusters of cattails near the water.
- When Keisha and her uncle left, her shoes were still clean because they stayed on the boardwalk.
Explanation: This question assesses CCSS.RI.5.1: quoting accurately from a text when explaining what the text says explicitly. This is an explicit question. The passage explicitly states information about wetlands and flooding in the third paragraph. The text says: 'Later, Keisha read a sign that said wetlands help slow floods by holding extra water.' This is literal information that can be found and quoted directly from the passage. Choice C is correct because it accurately quotes what the text explicitly states: the sign said 'wetlands help slow floods by holding extra water.' This is found in the third paragraph and directly answers the question about wetlands preventing flooding. Choice A represents a quote about observation technique, not flooding. Students who select this may have chosen an interesting quote from the guide but failed to check if it answers the specific question about flooding, selecting a quote that sounds related but doesn't answer this question. To help students quote accurately: (1) Teach 'find and quote' strategy: Read question, identify key words, scan text for those key words or synonyms, read that section carefully, find exact sentence that answers question. (2) Use quotation marks when copying exact words. (3) Check: Does this quote directly answer the question? Is it exactly what the text says? (4) Practice distinguishing stated facts from inferences: Ask 'Can I point to the exact place the text says this?' If yes, it's explicit. If 'I figured it out from clues,' it's inference. (5) Model think-aloud: 'The question asks about wetlands preventing flooding. Let me scan for words like flood or flooding. Here in paragraph 3, it says wetlands help slow floods by holding extra water. That's the answer.'
Question 4
Read the passage.
In the Sonoran Desert, summer days can be extremely hot, and rain may not fall for weeks. The saguaro cactus can grow more than 40 feet tall and live for over 150 years. Its thick, pleated skin expands like an accordion after a storm. Scientists explain that a saguaro can store hundreds of gallons of water inside its stem.
Saguaros have sharp spines instead of leaves. A spine is a stiff, pointed structure that grows from the cactus. The spines shade the cactus and help protect it from animals. Saguaros also have shallow roots that spread out in a wide circle. After a short rain, the roots can soak up water quickly.
At night, many desert animals rest near saguaros. Birds sometimes build nests in holes called "cavities" in the cactus. In spring, the cactus grows white flowers at the top. Bats and insects drink nectar from the flowers and carry pollen from plant to plant.
Based on the passage, what can you infer is one reason saguaros have pleated skin?
- It makes the cactus smell sweet so bats can find it.
- It helps the cactus expand to hold more water after rain. (correct answer)
- It allows the cactus to move its roots deeper into the ground.
- It keeps the cactus from growing taller than 40 feet.
Explanation: This question assesses CCSS.RI.5.1: drawing inferences from the text. This is an inference question. The passage does not directly state why saguaros have pleated skin, but the evidence supports this conclusion. The text says the thick, pleated skin 'expands like an accordion after a storm.' It also states that 'a saguaro can store hundreds of gallons of water inside its stem.' The connection between expandable skin and water storage is not explicit but can be inferred. Together, these clues allow readers to infer that pleated skin helps the cactus expand to hold water. Choice A is correct because it is a logical inference supported by multiple pieces of evidence: the skin expands like an accordion after storms, and the cactus stores hundreds of gallons of water. While not stated directly, the expandable pleated skin logically allows the cactus to increase its capacity for water storage. Choice B represents an unsupported inference about smell. Students who select this may have confused the flower's function (attracting bats) with the skin's function, making an inference without checking for supporting evidence about pleated skin specifically. To help students draw inferences: (1) Teach inference equation: Text clues + What I know = Inference. (2) Use 'evidence scavenger hunt': Identify 2-3 pieces of evidence from text that point toward conclusion. (3) Check inference is not explicitly stated: If you can point to exact sentence stating conclusion, it's not inference. (4) Ensure evidence supports inference: Test each answer against passage details—does evidence actually lead to this conclusion? (5) Model think-aloud: 'The text doesn't say why the skin is pleated, but I notice it expands like an accordion after storms and the cactus stores hundreds of gallons of water. These clues together suggest the pleats allow expansion for water storage.'
Question 5
Read the passage.
Maya Okafor is a 12-year-old who plays the violin in her school orchestra in Atlanta, Georgia. She practiced for 20 minutes each day in September (2024). In October, she increased her practice time to 35 minutes each day. Maya kept a calendar on her wall and wrote one goal on each Monday.
First, she worked on holding the bow straight. Then she practiced a difficult song section with slow, steady notes. Next, she recorded herself on a tablet and listened for squeaks. Finally, she played the same section again, trying to improve one small part at a time.
Maya's teacher, Mr. Alvarez, noticed the change. "Your sound is clearer, and your rhythm is steadier," he said after a rehearsal. At the fall concert, Maya felt nervous, but she still volunteered to play a short solo.
The text suggests that Maya is determined. Which detail from the passage best supports this inference?
- She practiced for 20 minutes each day in September (2024).
- She recorded herself and tried to improve one small part at a time. (correct answer)
- At the fall concert, Maya felt nervous.
- Maya plays the violin in her school orchestra in Atlanta, Georgia.
Explanation: This question assesses CCSS.RI.5.1: drawing inferences from the text. This is an inference question about determination. The passage does not directly state that Maya is determined, but the evidence supports this conclusion. She increased practice time from 20 to 35 minutes daily, kept a calendar with weekly goals, worked systematically on specific skills, and recorded herself to identify problems. She played the same section repeatedly to improve small parts. Together, these clues allow readers to infer determination. Choice C is correct because it is the best evidence of determination: recording herself and trying to improve one small part at a time shows persistent, focused effort to get better. While not stating 'she is determined,' this methodical self-improvement demonstrates determination. Choice B represents a fact about practice time but doesn't show the quality of determination as clearly. Students who select this may have chosen a detail about practice without recognizing that the recording and targeted improvement better demonstrates determination through self-directed effort. To help students draw inferences: (1) Teach inference equation: Text clues + What I know = Inference. (2) Use 'evidence scavenger hunt': Identify 2-3 pieces of evidence from text that point toward conclusion. (3) Check inference is not explicitly stated: If you can point to exact sentence stating conclusion, it's not inference. (4) Ensure evidence supports inference: Test each answer against passage details—does evidence actually lead to this conclusion? (5) Model think-aloud: 'The text doesn't say Maya is determined directly, but I notice she recorded herself, listened for problems, and worked on improving small parts. This systematic self-improvement suggests determination.'
Question 6
Jamal Chen lives in a small town in Oregon where winter nights are long. In January 2023, he decided to build a "book porch" outside the community center. A book porch is a weatherproof box where people can take a book and leave a book. Jamal measured a wooden crate that was 24 inches wide and 18 inches tall. He added a clear plastic door and a simple latch.
First, Jamal sanded the wood until it felt smooth. Then he painted it bright blue so drivers could see it. Next, he asked the center's director for permission to place it near the front steps. Finally, he labeled it with a sign that read, "Free Books for Everyone."
During the first week, Jamal checked the box every morning before school. He noticed that books disappeared quickly, and new ones appeared by afternoon. "I didn't think adults would use it, too," Jamal said. The director later said that 63 books were borrowed or traded in one month.
Which sentence from the text best supports the idea that Jamal planned carefully before building the book porch?
- The director later reported that 63 books were borrowed or traded in one month.
- He added a clear plastic door and a simple latch.
- Jamal measured a wooden crate that was 24 inches wide and 18 inches tall. (correct answer)
- "I didn't think adults would use it, too," Jamal said.
Explanation: Measuring the crate before building shows Jamal planned carefully ahead of time. Choice C gives that evidence, so it is correct. Choice A is about results after building, Choice B is one building step, and Choice D is a surprised comment, so none best shows careful planning before he built it.
Question 7
Read the passage.
In a coastal town in Maine, the city council wanted to reduce electricity use in public buildings. In February (2022), they began a project at Harborview Library. An energy audit is a careful check of how a building uses energy. The audit team measured how much power the lights, computers, and heaters used each day.
First, workers replaced 48 old light bulbs with LED bulbs. Then they installed motion sensors in the meeting rooms, so lights turned off when no one was inside. Next, the librarian, Ms. Patel, placed signs near the doors that said, "Please close the door to keep warm air in." Finally, the council set the thermostat two degrees lower after closing time.
After six weeks, the library's electric bill dropped from $1,120 to $860. Ms. Patel said, "We didn't buy new computers, but we still saved money." Visitors also reported that the building felt just as comfortable as before.
Based on the passage, what can you conclude about the project's results?
- The project increased electricity use because LEDs use more power.
- The project worked only because the library bought new computers.
- The project saved money without making the library uncomfortable. (correct answer)
- The project failed because the building became too cold for visitors.
Explanation: This question assesses CCSS.RI.5.1: drawing inferences from the text. This is an inference question. The passage does not directly state the project's overall success, but the evidence supports this conclusion. The electric bill dropped from $1,120 to $860 (saving money). Ms. Patel confirmed they saved money without buying new computers. Visitors reported the building felt just as comfortable as before. Together, these clues allow readers to infer the project saved money without making the library uncomfortable. Choice B is correct because it is a logical inference supported by multiple pieces of evidence: the electric bill decreased by $260, Ms. Patel confirmed savings, and visitors said comfort levels remained the same. While not stated directly, this conclusion about successful cost savings without comfort loss is well-supported by the text. Choice A represents an inference that contradicts the text. Students who select this may have assumed lower thermostat settings made the building cold, but missed that visitors reported it felt 'just as comfortable as before,' contradicting this inference. To help students draw inferences: (1) Teach inference equation: Text clues + What I know = Inference. (2) Use 'evidence scavenger hunt': Identify 2-3 pieces of evidence from text that point toward conclusion. (3) Check inference is not explicitly stated: If you can point to exact sentence stating conclusion, it's not inference. (4) Ensure evidence supports inference: Test each answer against passage details—does evidence actually lead to this conclusion? (5) Model think-aloud: 'The text doesn't say the project was successful directly, but I notice the bill dropped $260, they saved money, and visitors said it was still comfortable. These clues together suggest they saved money without sacrificing comfort.'
Question 8
In 1903, the Wright brothers tested a flying machine at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. Orville Wright lay on the lower wing and steered using a system of levers. Wilbur Wright ran beside the machine to help it start. The first flight lasted 12 seconds and traveled 120 feet. That same day, the brothers completed three more flights.
The brothers did not begin as famous inventors. They owned a bicycle shop in Dayton, Ohio, and they studied how air moved over wings. A glider is an aircraft that can fly without an engine. Before using an engine, the Wright brothers tested many gliders and wrote notes about what worked.
A local witness, John Daniels, later said, "It rose from the sand like it meant to be there." News traveled slowly, but the brothers continued improving their design. By 1905, their airplane could stay in the air for more than 30 minutes.
According to the passage, what is a glider?
- It is a system of levers that a pilot uses to steer a machine through the air.
- It is a long flight that stays in the air for more than thirty minutes at a time.
- It is a kind of aircraft that is able to fly through the air without any engine. (correct answer)
- It is a special bicycle part that helps a rider steer safely down a sandy road.
Explanation: The passage tells you directly what a glider is: an aircraft that can fly without an engine. It even says the Wright brothers tested many gliders before they added an engine to their machine. So the choice about an aircraft that flies without any engine matches what the text says. The choice about a system of levers describes how Orville steered the flying machine, not what a glider is. The choice about a flight lasting more than thirty minutes uses a real detail from the passage, but that describes how long the 1905 airplane could stay up, not a glider. The choice about a bicycle part connects to the brothers' bicycle shop, but the passage never says a glider is a bicycle part. To answer, scan the passage for the word 'glider' and read the sentence around it carefully.
Question 9
Read the passage.
In a science lab, students tested how quickly sugar dissolves in water. Dissolve means to mix evenly into a liquid so it seems to disappear. The class used three cups, each with 200 milliliters of water. Cup A held cold water, Cup B held room-temperature water, and Cup C held warm water.
First, the students poured 10 grams of sugar into each cup. Then they stirred each cup exactly 20 times with the same spoon. Next, they timed how long it took for the sugar grains to disappear. Finally, they wrote their results on a chart.
Their teacher, Dr. Nguyen, said, "Keep everything the same except the temperature." The students found that Cup A took 150 seconds, Cup B took 90 seconds, and Cup C took 45 seconds.
Based on the results, what can you conclude about water temperature and dissolving sugar?
- Sugar dissolves faster when the water is warmer. (correct answer)
- Sugar dissolves at the same speed in every cup because each one was stirred exactly 20 times.
- Sugar dissolves fastest in cold water, since the grains sink to the bottom more quickly.
- Sugar dissolves more slowly in warm water than it does in cold water.
Explanation: Look at how long the sugar took to disappear in each cup. Cold water took the longest at 150 seconds, room-temperature water took 90 seconds, and warm water took only 45 seconds. As the water gets warmer, the time gets shorter, so warmer water dissolves sugar faster. That is why choosing that warmer water dissolves faster is the best answer.
The choice saying every cup was the same speed is wrong because the three times are different (150, 90, and 45 seconds); stirring the same number of times did not make them equal. The choice saying cold water is fastest is wrong because cold water actually took the longest (150 seconds), and how quickly grains sink is not the same as how quickly they dissolve. The choice saying warm water is slower than cold water is backwards—warm water took only 45 seconds while cold water took 150 seconds, so warm water was faster, not slower. Only one answer matches the pattern in the results.
Question 10
Read the passage.
In 2018, 11-year-old Sofia Ramirez noticed that the storm drains near her school in San Diego, California, were often covered with plastic wrappers. Sofia started a lunchtime club called "Clean Flow." She met with 14 classmates every Tuesday. First, the club mapped three blocks around the school. Then they counted trash for 20 minutes at each corner. Next, they wrote down what they found in a notebook. Finally, they cleaned the area using gloves and grabbers.
Sofia kept careful records. "If we count it, we can change it," she told the principal. According to the club's notes, they collected 312 pieces of trash in September and 198 pieces in October. After that, Sofia asked a local store owner, Mr. Lee, to place a recycling bin outside his shop. Mr. Lee agreed and said, "I didn't realize how much litter came from quick snacks."
By November, the corners near the store had fewer wrappers. The club did not clean less often, but they filled fewer bags each week. Some students began bringing reusable water bottles, and the cafeteria started selling fruit in paper trays instead of plastic cups.
Based on information in the text, what can you conclude about why the amount of trash decreased over time?
- The trash decreased because the club worked harder and spent more time cleaning each corner every week.
- The trash decreased because more people changed their habits and had better places to recycle. (correct answer)
- The trash decreased because Sofia's careful counting scared students into dropping less litter near the school.
- The trash decreased because the store's new recycling bin was the only reason there were fewer wrappers.
Explanation: The passage never says directly why trash went down, so you have to put clues together. Mr. Lee added a recycling bin, students started bringing reusable water bottles, and the cafeteria switched from plastic cups to paper trays. These clues all point to people changing what they did and having better ways to recycle—so the answer about changed habits and better recycling places is the best conclusion.
The idea that the club worked harder is wrong: the text says the club did not clean less often, but it never says they worked harder or cleaned longer. The idea that Sofia's counting scared students into littering less is not supported; the text shows counting helped the club plan, not that it frightened anyone. The idea that the recycling bin was the only reason is too narrow—it ignores the reusable bottles and the cafeteria's paper trays, which also helped. Only the changed-habits answer fits all the evidence in the passage.