5th Grade ELA Quiz: Analyze Multiple Accounts Of Same Event
14 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Analyze Multiple Accounts Of Same EventQuestion 1 of 14

Source 1: City Council Statement, April 12
The city will fix up Maple Street Park starting May 1. The plan adds safer walkways, new playground gear, and more lights. The budget is 85,000 dollars. The work should take eight weeks. The council thinks the changes will help families.

Source 2: Jamal, Neighborhood Resident, April 13
I have visited Maple Street Park since I was little, so I feel protective of it. I like the idea of safer paths, but I worry about losing the shady trees. During the work, my little sister will have nowhere close to play. I hope the city listens to neighbors.

What is an important difference between Source 1's perspective and Source 2's perspective on the park renovation?

Source 1 focuses on the budget and planned improvements, while Source 2 focuses on personal feelings and worries.
Source 1 shares one family's private memories, while Source 2 lists the official plan and its total cost.
Source 1 warns that the changes will harm families, while Source 2 promises the park will be much safer soon.
Source 1 explains the schedule of the work, while Source 2 lists the same budget and timeline in different words.
← Back to quizzes

5th Grade ELA Quiz

5th Grade ELA Quiz: Analyze Multiple Accounts Of Same Event

Practice Analyze Multiple Accounts Of Same Event in 5th Grade ELA with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Analyze Multiple Accounts Of Same Event, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for 5th Grade ELA.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Source 1: City Council Statement, April 12
The city will fix up Maple Street Park starting May 1. The plan adds safer walkways, new playground gear, and more lights. The budget is 85,000 dollars. The work should take eight weeks. The council thinks the changes will help families.

Source 2: Jamal, Neighborhood Resident, April 13
I have visited Maple Street Park since I was little, so I feel protective of it. I like the idea of safer paths, but I worry about losing the shady trees. During the work, my little sister will have nowhere close to play. I hope the city listens to neighbors.

What is an important difference between Source 1's perspective and Source 2's perspective on the park renovation?

  1. Source 1 focuses on the budget and planned improvements, while Source 2 focuses on personal feelings and worries. (correct answer)
  2. Source 1 shares one family's private memories, while Source 2 lists the official plan and its total cost.
  3. Source 1 warns that the changes will harm families, while Source 2 promises the park will be much safer soon.
  4. Source 1 explains the schedule of the work, while Source 2 lists the same budget and timeline in different words.
Explanation: The council statement gives facts about the plan: the budget, the new walkways and lights, and how long the work will take. Jamal, a resident, shares his feelings—his love for the park, his worry about the shady trees, and his sister having nowhere to play. So the best answer names that the first source focuses on the budget and improvements while the second focuses on personal feelings and worries. The choice saying Source 1 shares private memories flips the sources—those memories belong to Jamal, not the council. The choice saying Source 1 warns of harm and Source 2 promises safety reverses both views; the council supports the plan and Jamal is the worried one. The choice claiming Source 2 repeats the budget and timeline is wrong because Jamal never lists costs or a schedule—only the council does that.

Question 2

Read the three sources about the same invention: a new water bottle that tracks how much you drink.

Source 1: [Product Designer Interview, Jan. 15, Tech Magazine]
We built the bottle with a sensor that measures the water level after each sip. A small light reminds users to drink if they have been inactive. Our team tested the bottle for leaks and battery life. We wanted a simple tool that helps people build healthy habits.

Source 2: [News Report, Jan. 16, Local Newspaper]
A new "smart bottle" arrived in stores this week and quickly sold out online. Some customers say reminders help them drink more water at school and sports practice. Others worry the bottle costs too much compared to a regular one. The company says it plans to lower the price later.

Source 3: [Health Researcher Summary, Feb. 1, School Website]
Drinking enough water can support focus and energy during the day. Reminder tools may help some people, but they do not work for everyone. Researchers suggest paying attention to thirst and choosing water over sugary drinks. A smart bottle can be helpful when used with other healthy choices.

How does the author's role affect the perspective in Source 1 compared with Source 3?

  1. Source 1 focuses on how the sensor works, while Source 3 focuses on health advice and what research suggests. (correct answer)
  2. Source 1 focuses on how much the bottle costs, while Source 3 focuses on how quickly it sold out in stores.
  3. Source 1 focuses on customer reviews and complaints, while Source 3 focuses on how the light reminder was built.
  4. Source 1 focuses on the price dropping later, while Source 3 focuses on which stores carry the smart bottle.
Explanation: Source 1 comes from the designer, so it explains how the sensor works and what the team tested. Source 3 comes from a health researcher, so it gives advice about drinking water and shares what research suggests. The correct choice names exactly that difference in focus. One choice says Source 1 is about cost and Source 3 is about selling out, but those topics come from the news report, not these two sources. Another swaps the roles, claiming Source 1 has customer reviews and Source 3 explains how the light was built, when it is really the opposite. The last choice says Source 1 is about the price dropping and Source 3 lists stores, but neither idea appears in these two sources. Only one choice matches how each author's role shapes their perspective.

Question 3

Read the two sources about the same change: fewer bees seen near a neighborhood.

Source 1: Community Scientist Group, May 20, Observation Report
Volunteers counted bees in three gardens for four weeks. They saw fewer visits to flowers. The group lists a few possible causes. One is less flowering space. Another is the use of bug spray. They suggest planting more native flowers. They also say not to spray during bloom time. The report asks neighbors to share what they see to help the data.

Source 2: Local Garden Store Owner, May 22, Short Interview
Customers keep asking why their plants have fewer bees this spring. I think the weather has been strange, with cool mornings that keep insects quiet. People also want quick fixes, but gardens change slowly. I tell shoppers to pick bee-friendly plants and to be patient.

Which statement best describes how the perspectives differ between Source 1 and Source 2?

  1. Both sources report gathered bee counts, but Source 1 shares them to prove a cause and Source 2 shares them to sell more plants.
  2. Source 1 focuses on collected observations and suggestions, while Source 2 focuses on customer questions and personal ideas. (correct answer)
  3. Both sources agree on the main cause, but Source 1 blames cool weather and Source 2 blames the loss of flowering space.
  4. Both sources give the same advice, but Source 1 tells neighbors to spray flowers and Source 2 tells shoppers to plant fewer bees.
Explanation: The best answer notices that Source 1 comes from volunteers who counted bees and offered suggestions like planting native flowers, while Source 2 is a store owner sharing what customers ask and his own guess about the weather. That difference in how each source knows and shares information is the real contrast. One wrong choice claims both sources report gathered counts, but only Source 1 counted bees, and neither is trying to prove a single cause or sell plants that way. Another wrong choice says the sources agree on one cause and then flips who blames what; the sources do not agree, and it mixes up their ideas. The last wrong choice claims both give the same advice, but their advice differs, and 'plant fewer bees' is not something anyone can do. Only the answer about observations versus questions and personal ideas matches both sources.

Question 4

Source 1: City Council Statement, April 2025
The City Council approved a plan to fix up Maple Street Park this summer. The project will add new swings, safer paths, and brighter lights. The council says the changes will help families. They will also cut down on accidents at night. The city will pay with a mix of grant money and local taxes.

Source 2: Neighborhood Resident Interview, April 2025
"I grew up playing under the old oak tree at Maple Street Park," Maya said. She feels excited about the new equipment. But she worries the park may lose its quiet feeling. Maya hopes the workers will protect the tree and keep some grassy space. She also wonders if the noise will last all summer.

Source 3: Landscape Architect Notes, April 2025
The designer says the new paths will use a material that is less slippery in the rain. The plan includes native plants. These plants attract butterflies and use less water. The architect focuses on making corners easier to see. The memo lists each design choice and its reason.

Which statement best describes how the perspectives in the sources differ?

  1. Source 1 focuses on the old oak tree, Source 2 focuses on saving grant money, and Source 3 focuses on families feeling safe at night.
  2. Source 1 focuses on funding and public benefits, Source 2 focuses on personal memories and worries, and Source 3 focuses on design details. (correct answer)
  3. Source 1 focuses on butterflies and native plants, Source 2 focuses on brighter lights, and Source 3 focuses on how the city will pay for the work.
  4. Source 1 focuses on quiet grassy space, Source 2 focuses on less slippery paths, and Source 3 focuses on a resident's happy childhood memories.
Explanation: To answer this, match each source to what it really cares about. The council statement is about money (grants and taxes) and public benefits like safety and helping families. Maya's interview is personal: her memories of the oak tree and her worries about noise and quiet. The architect's notes are all about design choices, like non-slip paths and native plants. The correct choice names all three focuses correctly. One wrong choice mixes them up: it gives the tree to the council, the money to Maya, and safety to the designer. Another swaps the plants and lights into the wrong sources and puts funding with the architect. The last one hands quiet grassy space to the council, paths to Maya, and childhood memories to the designer. Each of these matches a real detail from the passage to the wrong speaker, so they only sound right until you check who actually said what.

Question 5

Source 1: [Cafeteria Manager Memo, October 2025, staff memo]
Next week we will replace foam trays with washable trays. Staff will teach students how to return trays to the correct rack. The change should reduce trash bags each day and save money over time. We will also need extra time to wash trays during the first month.

Source 2: [Parent Letter to the Principal, October 2025, concerned viewpoint]
I support reducing waste, and I'm glad the school is trying. Still, I worry about whether trays will be cleaned well between lunches. Some students have food allergies, and families need clear information. Please share the washing steps and how the school will check for cleanliness.

What is an important difference between the perspectives in Source 1 and Source 2?

  1. Source 1 focuses on how the change will work day to day, while Source 2 focuses on health and telling families. (correct answer)
  2. Source 1 is against reusable trays, while Source 2 mainly wants the school to stop trying to save any money.
  3. Source 1 explains the daily steps, while Source 2 asks the school to speed up washing to save extra time.
  4. Both sources share the same viewpoint, since each one lists the exact same reasons for the change.
Explanation: The correct answer notices that the manager's memo explains how the switch will work each day—returning trays, cutting trash, saving money, and needing extra wash time—while the parent's letter is about student health, food allergies, and sharing clear washing steps with families. That is the real difference in what each writer cares about. The choice saying Source 1 is against reusable trays is wrong: the memo plans the change, and the parent supports reducing waste rather than only opposing savings. The choice about speeding up washing misreads Source 2, which asks for cleaning to be checked, not rushed. The choice saying both sources agree is wrong because the memo and letter raise different concerns, not the same reasons. Only the first choice correctly compares each writer's true focus.

Question 6

Source 1: Principal's Email to Families, September 2025
Starting Monday, students will sort paper, plastic, and trash after lunch. Teachers will go over the rules. Student helpers will stand by the bins. Our goal is to cut lunchroom trash in half by winter break. The school will share updates in the morning news.

Source 2: Student Newspaper Article by Jamal, September 2025
At lunch today, I watched students try the new recycling bins. Some kids did it quickly. Others felt confused about wrappers. I think the signs need clearer pictures. Younger students especially need them. Still, it felt good to see less trash on the tables.

What is an important difference between Source 1's perspective and Source 2's perspective on the recycling program?

  1. Source 1 shares a student's day-to-day observations, while Source 2 focuses on setting official rules and long-term goals for the program.
  2. Source 1 argues the program will probably fail, while Source 2 argues that the program has already helped and is completely finished.
  3. Source 1 mainly reports what confused kids at lunch, while Source 2 mainly explains the plan the whole school will follow.
  4. Source 1 gives a leader's viewpoint and focuses on goals, while Source 2 gives a student's viewpoint and focuses on daily challenges. (correct answer)
Explanation: The principal's email speaks as a leader, laying out the plan: how sorting will work, who will help, and the goal of cutting trash in half by winter break. Jamal's article speaks as a student watching lunch happen, noticing who did well, who felt confused, and how the signs could improve. So the true difference is a leader's goal-focused view versus a student's view of daily challenges. The choice that swaps these—saying the principal shares day-to-day observations and the student sets official goals—reverses who wrote each source. The choice claiming the principal reports confused kids and the student explains the school's plan also switches their roles. The choice saying Source 1 predicts failure and Source 2 says the program is 'completely finished' invents claims neither source makes; the email states a hopeful goal, and Jamal says the program is just starting.

Question 7

Source 1: Principal Rivera, Sept. 3, School Announcement
Our school will start a recycling program on Monday to reduce the amount of trash. Each classroom will get a blue bin for paper and clean plastic. We will weigh the recycled items every Friday and share the results in morning announcements. I hope everyone will help so we can reach our goal.

Source 2: Maya, 5th grader, Sept. 6, Student Newspaper
On Monday, our class got a new blue bin, and it filled up fast. Some students were not sure what counts as clean plastic, so I saw that we needed a clear sign near the bin to help people decide. Still, it felt good to see less trash in our classroom can.

Source 3: Mr. Chen, Custodian, Sept. 7, Staff Interview
I collect the bins after school and check them for food or wet paper. When trash gets mixed in, the whole bag may be thrown away, so I want students to rinse their bottles and keep lunch leftovers out. If we sort the items correctly, the program will run smoothly.

Which statement best describes how the perspectives in the three sources differ?

  1. Source 1 focuses on the school's goals and rules, while Sources 2 and 3 focus on the daily challenges of sorting. (correct answer)
  2. All three sources focus on the schedule for weighing recycling, while none of them mention any problems with sorting items.
  3. Source 1 describes actual sorting problems, while Sources 2 and 3 mostly explain the school's overall goals for the program.
  4. All three sources focus on how the recycling program reminds students to keep the school hallways clean and quiet.
Explanation: The principal's announcement sets out the program's goals and rules, like the Friday weigh-ins and the blue bins. Maya and Mr. Chen instead describe the everyday problems of sorting, such as unclear signs and trash mixed in with recycling. That difference in viewpoint makes the first answer correct. The choice saying everyone only discusses the weighing schedule is wrong because Maya and Mr. Chen clearly point out sorting problems. The choice that flips the roles is wrong because it is the principal, not the student and custodian, who states the goals; those two describe the challenges. The choice about keeping hallways clean and quiet is wrong because the sources are about recycling and trash, not hallway behavior.

Question 8

Read the two sources about the same weather event: a strong thunderstorm in one town.

Source 1: [Meteorologist Report, June 18, Weather Update]
A line of thunderstorms moved through the county between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. Winds reached about 45 miles per hour, and heavy rain reduced visibility. The storm was caused by warm, humid air meeting a cooler front. Residents should watch for flooded streets and downed branches.

Source 2: [Carlos, Local Resident, June 18, Text Message to a Cousin]
The sky turned greenish, and the wind pushed our trash cans across the driveway. My mom and I unplugged the TV when the lightning got close. Water rushed down the street like a small river, and our dog hid under the table. After it passed, we heard sirens and saw leaves everywhere.

Why might the authors describe the same storm differently?

  1. They disagree about whether a storm happened in the town at all that day.
  2. One author is a weather expert who explains causes and safety, while the other is a resident who shares what he saw. (correct answer)
  3. One author uses longer sentences, which somehow makes the storm stronger.
  4. They are writing about two completely different storms in two different countries.
Explanation: Source 1 is a meteorologist giving measurements, causes, and safety advice, while Source 2 is a resident describing what he saw and felt, so their purposes and viewpoints differ. Choice B explains that, so it is correct. Choice A says they disagree a storm happened, Choice C says sentence length changes the storm, and Choice D says different countries, none of which is supported.

Question 9

Source 1: [Transportation Department, Aug. 10, Official Update]
The city added a protected bike lane on Oak Avenue to improve safety for cyclists. Crews painted new lines, added flexible posts, and adjusted traffic signals at two intersections. The department expects the lane to reduce crashes and encourage more people to bike. Drivers should watch for new signs and follow the posted speed limit.

Source 2: [Ms. Emma Diaz, Cafe Owner on Oak Avenue, Aug. 12, Comment to Reporter]
I want people to be safe, and I'm glad cyclists have their own space now. But some customers say parking feels harder during the morning rush. Delivery drivers also need a clear place to stop for a few minutes. I hope the city will add short-term loading spots so businesses can still run smoothly.

How does Source 2's viewpoint differ from Source 1's viewpoint on the new bike lane?

  1. Source 2 focuses on how the lane affects businesses, like parking and deliveries, while Source 1 focuses on the city's safety plans. (correct answer)
  2. Source 2 argues the lane should be removed completely, while Source 1 mostly describes how it hopes to prevent car crashes downtown.
  3. Source 2 warns that the new lane is dangerous for cyclists, while Source 1 gives no real reason for building the lane at all.
  4. Source 2 explains the steps crews took to build the lane, while Source 1 shares how local shop owners feel about the change.
Explanation: Source 1 is the Transportation Department explaining its safety goals for the lane, while Source 2 is a cafe owner focused on how the change affects businesses, like parking and deliveries. The correct answer names that difference exactly. The choice saying Source 2 wants the lane removed is wrong because she actually says she is glad cyclists have their own space. The choice saying Source 2 calls the lane dangerous for cyclists is wrong because she never says that, and Source 1 clearly gives a reason: to improve safety. The choice that swaps the sources is wrong because it is Source 1 that lists the building steps and Source 2 that shares a shop owner's feelings, not the other way around.

Question 10

Source 1: Teacher Handout by Ms. Chen, January 2026
Students will pick a testable question. They will record results in a data table. Judges will score projects on clear thinking, careful steps, and neat displays. All students must show their sources and explain what they learned. Projects should be student-made, with adult help only for safety.

Source 2: Student Journal by Sofia, January 2026
I felt nervous setting up my project about plant growth under different lights. When the judges came by, my hands shook. But I remembered to explain my steps. I was proud that my results surprised me, even though one plant died early. I learned that mistakes can still teach you something.

Source 3: Parent Blog Post by Amir's Dad, January 2026
The gym looked like a mini museum, with posters and models everywhere. I noticed students practicing their speeches. They cheered each other on. Some families took lots of photos. The crowd got loud near the awards table. The fair seemed to bring the school together.

How does the author's role affect the perspective in each source?

  1. The teacher focuses on her own nervous feelings, the student focuses on the rules for scoring, and the parent focuses on what she learned from a mistake.
  2. The teacher focuses on the scoring rules, the student focuses on how the gym looked, and the parent focuses on the steps for setting up a project.
  3. The teacher focuses on rules and judging, the student focuses on feelings and learning, and the parent focuses on how the event looked and felt. (correct answer)
  4. The teacher focuses on the busy crowd, the student focuses on judging steps, and the parent focuses on choosing a testable question.
Explanation: Each author writes about what matters to their role. The teacher's handout lays out the rules and how judges will score projects. The student's journal shares her nervous feelings and what she learned. The parent's blog post describes how the fair looked and felt from the crowd. The choice matching all three roles to those focuses is correct. The choice that gives the teacher nervous feelings, the student the scoring rules, and the parent a lesson learned swaps the roles around. The choice that says the student watched the gym and the parent explained project steps also mixes up who noticed what. The choice about the teacher watching the crowd and the parent choosing a question again matches the wrong role to each focus. Only one choice lines up each author with the ideas their role would actually notice.

Question 11

Source 1: [Amir, Garden Organizer, May 5, Flyer]
Come to the opening of the Riverbend Community Garden this Saturday. We will show helpers how to water, pull weeds, and compost. Each family can sign up for a small plot to grow food. Our goal is to share fresh food and make new friends.

Source 2: [Yuki, New Gardener, May 8, Personal Reflection]
I planted my first lettuce seeds and learned how to space them out. I liked talking with neighbors I had never met before. I also learned that gardening takes patience. Plants do not grow overnight. I cannot wait to taste something I grew myself.

Source 3: [City Planner Note, May 9, Planning Newsletter]
The Riverbend Community Garden helps make a greener block and better rain control. More plants can soak up rain and cut down runoff on nearby streets. The garden also turns an empty lot into a useful space. City staff will check the site to keep it safe and clean.

Source 3 focuses on city planning, while Source 2 focuses on personal experience. What does this reveal about their different viewpoints?

  1. Source 3 focuses on how much fresh food the garden can grow, while Source 2 focuses on the wider rain control benefits for the block.
  2. Source 3 sees the garden as a community project with city benefits, while Source 2 sees it as a personal learning experience. (correct answer)
  3. Source 3 focuses on making new friends at the garden, while Source 2 focuses on keeping the empty lot safe and clean for the city.
  4. Source 3 focuses on one gardener's feelings about her plants, while Source 2 focuses on the block getting greener across the whole city.
Explanation: Source 3 is written by a city planner who looks at wider benefits, like a greener block, better rain control, and turning an empty lot into a useful space. Source 2 is a gardener sharing her own experience of planting seeds, meeting neighbors, and learning patience. The best answer says Source 3 sees the garden as a community project with city benefits, while Source 2 sees it as a personal learning experience, which matches each viewpoint. Another choice swaps their focuses, giving Source 3 the food-growing detail and Source 2 the rain-control benefit, when the sources say the opposite. One choice mixes in friend-making, which belongs to the flyer in Source 1, not to Source 3, and hands the city's safety job to the gardener. The last choice flips the two writers completely, putting personal feelings in the planner's note and city-wide greening in the gardener's reflection. Only the correct answer keeps each source's real viewpoint in place.

Question 12

Source 1: Local News Story, April 2025 (reporter summary)
More than 200 volunteers met at the river trail for Clean-Up Day. The reporter notes that teams collected bags of litter and sorted recyclables. The story highlights a scout troop that found an old tire near the bridge. City workers thanked volunteers and promised to pick up the filled bags.

Source 2: Volunteer Diary Entry by Emma, April 2025 (eyewitness account)
I arrived early, and the river smelled fresh after last night's rain. My group picked up tiny bits of plastic that were hard to see. I felt proud, but also frustrated that so much trash was stuck in the grass. When we finished, my arms were tired, and I wished more people would stop littering.

Which statement best explains how the perspectives in Source 1 and Source 2 differ?

  1. Source 1 focuses on Emma's private feelings, while Source 2 gives the reporter's wide overview of how the whole cleanup event went.
  2. Source 1 reports the event in a broad, factual way, while Source 2 shares personal feelings from someone who took part. (correct answer)
  3. Source 1 lists exact numbers for every bag collected, while Source 2 proves those totals are wrong by counting the trash again.
  4. Source 1 and Source 2 tell the very same story in the same way, so there is really no difference in their perspectives at all.
Explanation: The news story gives a broad, factual summary of the whole Clean-Up Day, while Emma's diary shares one volunteer's personal feelings and what she saw and smelled. The correct choice names exactly that difference in perspective. One choice mixes up the two sources, saying the news story shares Emma's private feelings and the diary is the reporter's overview, but the labels and details show the opposite. Another choice claims the news story lists exact numbers and the diary proves those totals wrong, yet neither source counts bags or corrects any total. The last choice says both sources tell the same story the same way, but one is a wide reporter summary and the other is a personal eyewitness account, so they clearly differ.

Question 13

Source 1: News Report, July 20, 1969
Millions watched as the spacecraft landed on the Moon. The astronauts got ready to step outside. The announcer called the moment "a giant leap." He said there was steady contact with mission control. Engineers cheered when the landing was confirmed. The report told what was happening minute by minute.

Source 2: Astronaut Memoir, Published 1995
I remember the quiet inside the spacecraft. We did careful checks before we opened the hatch. I felt both excited and nervous as I looked at the Moon's surface. Training helped, but the moment still felt unreal. Later, I understood how many people helped the mission work.

Source 3: Modern Textbook, 2023
The Moon landing showed big progress in science and engineering. It also inspired students to study math and science. Historians note that the mission cost a lot. But it led to new inventions. The event is still an important symbol of exploring.

What do all the sources agree on about the Moon landing, and what do they show differently?

  1. All agree it happened in 1969, but they differ in focus: live reporting, personal memory, and long-term meaning. (correct answer)
  2. All agree the landing failed, but they differ on which astronaut caused the problem.
  3. All agree it happened in 1995, but they differ on what the Moon looks like.
  4. All the sources focus only on the cost of the mission and ignore what happened.
Explanation: All three sources treat the 1969 Moon landing as real and important, but each has a different focus: the news report covers it live, the memoir shares a personal memory, and the textbook explains its long-term meaning. Choice A names the agreement and the difference, so it is correct. Choice B says it failed, Choice C gives the wrong year, and Choice D says they only discuss cost, so none fits.

Question 14

Read these three sources about the same event: a new bike lane added on Oak Avenue.

Source 1: City Transportation Department Notice, March 2025, official notice

The city will paint a protected bike lane on Oak Avenue next month. Officials say the lane will help prevent crashes and make commuting safer. The notice lists the schedule and explains that parking will change on one side of the street. The department asks drivers to watch for new signs.

Source 2: Local Shop Owner Statement, March 2025, interview

Carlos, who owns a small bakery on Oak Avenue, supports safer streets. However, he worries fewer parking spots may hurt quick customer stops. He hopes the city will add short-term parking nearby. "I want cyclists safe, but I also need customers to reach my door," he said.

Source 3: Middle School Student Post for a Class Blog, March 2025, student viewpoint

I ride my bike to school, and Oak Avenue has always felt scary. I'm glad there will be a space just for bikes. I think more kids will ride if parents feel safer. I also hope the lane stays clear of trash and delivery trucks.

Which detail best shows that Source 2 and Source 3 have different perspectives on the bike lane?

  1. Source 2 wants the lane finished quickly, while Source 3 wants the city to delay the project until later.
  2. Source 2 hopes the lane keeps trash away, while Source 3 hopes the city will add more customer parking spots.
  3. Source 2 worries about losing customer parking, while Source 3 focuses on feeling safer while biking to school. (correct answer)
  4. Source 2 thinks the lane is dangerous, while Source 3 thinks the lane will not help anyone ride more often.
Explanation: The question asks which detail shows a real difference in perspective between the two sources. Carlos, the bakery owner, worries that fewer parking spots will make it harder for customers to reach his shop, while the student writer feels glad about having a safe space to bike to school. Because they care about different things—business and personal safety—this answer captures their true difference. The choice saying one wants the lane rushed and the other wants a delay is wrong because neither source mentions timing at all. The choice about trash and customer parking mixes up the sources: keeping the lane clear of trash is actually the student's hope, and adding parking is Carlos's hope, so the details are swapped. The choice claiming the shop owner thinks the lane is dangerous and the student thinks it won't help anyone misreads both: Carlos supports safer streets, and the student believes more kids will ride if parents feel safer. Only the correct answer matches what each source truly emphasizes.