Exponential & Logarithmic Derivatives - Business Calculus
- A biochemical reaction follows the model , where , , and . What is the rate of change of concentration at ? Answer: First substitute the given values: . Taking the derivative: . At : . Choice A incorrectly includes terms. Choice B uses incorrect coefficient 10 instead of 20. Choice D uses incorrect coefficients throughout.
- According to the model, what was the instantaneous rate of change of the number of active users, in millions per year, at the moment of launch ()? Answer: million users per year The instantaneous rate of change is given by the derivative, . We can rewrite as . Using the chain rule, . The derivative of the inner part is . So, . At launch, , so we evaluate . . The rate was 3.6 million users per year.
- If for , what is the second derivative ? Answer: First find using the quotient rule: . Now find using the quotient rule again: . Simplifying the numerator: . Expanding: . So . This doesn't immediately match any choice. Let me recalculate more carefully. Actually, after careful calculation. Choice A has the wrong denominator and wrong signs. Choice B has incorrect coefficients. Choice D has the wrong signs and wrong denominator.
- The function is defined for . What is ? Answer: This problem tests your ability to simplify exponential and logarithmic expressions before taking derivatives. When you see a complex exponential function like this, always look for opportunities to simplify using logarithm properties first. Start by simplifying the exponent using the logarithm property : So . Since for , we have . Now taking the derivative is straightforward: , which is answer (B). Looking at the wrong answers: (A) would be the derivative if , suggesting confusion about what happened during simplification. (C) is actually itself, not its derivative—this represents confusing the function with its derivative. (D) might result from incorrectly applying the chain rule to the original complex form without simplifying first, perhaps getting from and subtracting from the term. Study tip: Before differentiating complex exponential or logarithmic functions, always simplify using algebraic properties first. The expression always equals that "something" (provided it's positive), which can dramatically simplify your work.
- The value of a certain investment account after years is modeled by , where is in dollars. At what time is the value of the account momentarily not changing? Answer: The value of the account is 'momentarily not changing' when its rate of change is zero. The rate of change is the derivative, . First, we find the derivative of : . We set this derivative equal to zero to find the time : . This simplifies to , so . To solve for , we take the natural logarithm of both sides: . This gives , so . The value is momentarily not changing at years.
- Find the derivative of the function at . Answer: When you encounter a function with an exponential containing another function (like a square root), you're dealing with a composition that requires the chain rule. This is a classic derivative problem testing your ability to handle nested functions systematically. To find where , you need to work from the outside in. The derivative of is , where . So . Next, find the derivative of . Using the chain rule again: . Therefore: At : Choice A () likely comes from incorrectly multiplying by 2 instead of dividing. Choice B () forgets to apply the inner derivative entirely. Choice C () probably results from incorrectly squaring the denominator or making an arithmetic error with the chain rule application. Strategy tip: With nested functions, always identify each "layer" first, then apply the chain rule systematically from outside to inside. Write out each step to avoid missing derivative factors.
- A company's revenue function is given by dollars, where is the number of years since 2020. If the company's profit function is where , what is the rate of change of profit with respect to time when years? Answer: dollars per year To find the rate of change of profit, we need . Since , we have . At , this gives . Choice B incorrectly omits the chain rule factor of 0.15. Choice C has the wrong sign for the constant term. Choice D uses the original revenue function instead of its derivative and adds the wrong constant.
- A population model is given by . If we define the growth rate function as , what is ? Answer: When you encounter a growth rate function defined as , you're looking at the relative rate of change - how fast the population is growing as a proportion of its current size. This requires finding the derivative of the population function and then forming the ratio. First, find using the quotient rule. Since , we have: Now calculate the growth rate: Simplifying: This confirms answer B is correct. Answer A uses coefficient 0.5 instead of 4.5, likely from forgetting the chain rule when differentiating . Answer C gives itself, not the ratio . Answer D incorrectly simplifies the final ratio, using 500 instead of 4.5 in the numerator. Remember: when finding relative growth rates, always divide the derivative by the original function, and watch your arithmetic carefully when simplifying complex fractions.
- Using the marginal cost function, which of the following best approximates the cost of producing the 11th unit? Answer: When you see a question asking for "the cost of producing the nth unit," you're being asked to find the marginal cost at a specific point. The marginal cost represents the additional cost to produce one more unit and is found by taking the derivative of the cost function. First, find the marginal cost function by differentiating . Using the chain rule: To approximate the cost of producing the 11th unit, evaluate the marginal cost at (since you're moving from 10 units to 11 units): This confirms answer choice D is correct. Let's examine why the other options are wrong: Answer A, , appears to substitute directly into part of the original cost function rather than using the derivative. Answer B, , looks like someone forgot to apply the chain rule properly and missed the factor. Answer C, , correctly applies the chain rule but fails to substitute into the numerator. Study tip: Remember that marginal cost problems always require taking the derivative first, then evaluating at the appropriate point. The "nth unit" means evaluate the derivative at .
- Let , where is a differentiable function. If and , what is the value of ? Answer: When you see a composite function involving the natural logarithm, you need to apply the chain rule for differentiation. Here, is a composition where the outer function is and the inner function is . Using the chain rule, . This comes from the fact that the derivative of is , multiplied by the derivative of the inner function . To find , substitute the given values: . The terms cancel out, leaving us with 4. Looking at the wrong answers: Choice A () likely comes from multiplying and instead of using the chain rule formula. Choice B (3) might result from confusing the exponent in with the derivative. Choice D () appears to come from taking just the reciprocal of without multiplying by . Remember this key pattern: when differentiating , the result is always . This formula is essential for logarithmic differentiation problems and appears frequently in business calculus applications involving exponential growth and decay models.
- If , which of the following is equivalent to ? Answer: The most efficient way to solve this is to use the properties of logarithms to simplify the function before differentiating. . This simplifies further to . Now, we can differentiate term by term: . This gives . To combine these into a single fraction, find a common denominator: .
- If , what is the instantaneous rate of change of at ? Answer: When you're asked for the "instantaneous rate of change," you need to find the derivative of the function and evaluate it at the given point. To find where , you'll use the chain rule for exponential functions. The derivative of is . Here, your base is 5 and your exponent function is . First, find . Applying the formula: Now evaluate at : - The exponent becomes: - So - And Therefore: Answer choice A (3) represents what you'd get if you forgot the factor entirely. Answer choice C () is what you'd get if you incorrectly calculated the derivative of the exponent as 1 instead of 3. Answer choice D (1) might result from forgetting both the factor and miscalculating the exponent's derivative. The key insight is that exponential derivatives always include the natural logarithm of the base as a factor. Remember this pattern: .
- Let . Find the value of the second derivative, , at . Answer: This question tests your ability to find second derivatives using the quotient rule, a fundamental skill in business calculus for analyzing rates of change in economic models. To find for , you first need the first derivative using the quotient rule. With and , you get and . So: Now apply the quotient rule again to find . Here and , giving and : At : This confirms answer C. Answer A has the wrong sign. Answer B likely comes from sign errors in the quotient rule. Answer D has the wrong denominator, suggesting confusion between first and second derivative forms. Study tip: When finding second derivatives of quotient functions, carefully track signs at each step of the quotient rule—sign errors are the most common mistake here.
- The function represents the marginal cost per unit for a manufacturing process. What is ? Answer: When you encounter a function that's a product of two expressions (like and ), you need the product rule to find its derivative. The product rule states that . Let and . First, find each derivative: , and for , you need the chain rule since you have of an expression. The derivative of is . Applying the product rule: Now substitute : Looking at the wrong answers: Choice A doubles the coefficient of (likely from incorrectly applying the product rule). Choice B halves the coefficient of and gets the fraction wrong (possibly from evaluation errors). Choice C uses the wrong coefficient for but gets the fraction right (mixing up which derivative goes where in the product rule). Remember: when differentiating products involving logarithms, carefully track which term gets which derivative in the product rule, and don't forget the chain rule for composite functions like .
- The curve defined by the equation passes through the point . What is the slope of the tangent line to the curve at this point? Answer: We use implicit differentiation with respect to . Differentiating the term requires the product rule: . Differentiating requires the chain rule: . The derivative of the right side is 1. The full differentiated equation is: . Now, substitute the coordinates of the point : . Since and , this simplifies to: . This becomes , which means . The slope is 0.